User talk:Chabe01/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:App Store OS X.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:FBBP01 - Alternatif.svg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FBBP01 - Alternatif.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:FBBP01 - Alternatif.svg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:FBBP01.svg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FBBP01.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:FBBP01.svg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Pages iOS.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Mippzon (talk) 07:27, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:FBBP01.svg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:FBBP01.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 16:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:FBBP01.svg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:FBBP01.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FBBP01.svg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Palais sports Mâcon 2.jpg
- File:Palais sports Mâcon 1.jpg
- File:Halles St Pierre Mâcon 1.jpg
- File:Hôtel Dieu Mâcon 1.jpg
- File:Halles St Pierre Mâcon 2.jpg
- File:France 3 Bourgogne Mâcon 1.jpg
- File:France 3 Bourgogne Mâcon 2.jpg
- File:Cinéma Le Royal 2.jpg
- File:Archives Saône Loire 3.jpg
- File:Archives Saône Loire 4.jpg
- File:Archives Saône Loire 1.jpg
- File:Archives Saône Loire 2.jpg
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 21:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama
Please read up on, and follow the rules of, freedom of panorama. Many of your photos seem to violate this policy. Thanks, Elisfkc (talk) 18:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Plateau évolution Crottet 1.jpg
- File:Salle couverte tennis Crottet 6.jpg
- File:Salle couverte tennis Crottet 5.jpg
- File:Salle couverte tennis Crottet 4.jpg
- File:Salle couverte tennis Crottet 1.jpg
- File:Salle couverte tennis Crottet 3.jpg
- File:Salle couverte tennis Crottet 2.jpg
- File:Piste skate Crottet 4.jpg
- File:Piste skate Crottet 3.jpg
- File:Centre commercial Samiane 4.jpg
- File:Centre commercial Samiane 2.jpg
- File:Centre commercial Samiane 1.jpg
- File:Centre commercial Samiane 3.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée La Gare 5.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée La Gare 3.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée La Gare 4.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée La Gare 1.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée La Gare 2.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée Crottet 1.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée Crottet 2.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée Crottet 3.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée Crottet 4.jpg
- File:Gare Pt-de-Veyle 18.jpg
- File:Gare Pt-de-Veyle 12.jpg
- File:Gare Pt-de-Veyle 11.jpg
- File:Gare Pt-de-Veyle 09.jpg
- File:Gare Pt-de-Veyle 10.jpg
- File:Gare Pt-de-Veyle 19.jpg
- File:Bibliothèque - Annexe Pt-de-Veyle 2.jpg
- File:Bibliothèque Pt-de-Veyle 4.jpg
- File:Annexe mairie Pt-de-Veyle 2.jpg
- File:Annexe mairie Pt-de-Veyle 1.jpg
- File:Bibliothèque Pt-de-Veyle 3.jpg
- File:Bibliothèque - Annexe mairie Pt-de-Veyle 1.jpg
- File:Bibliothèque Pt-de-Veyle 2.jpg
- File:Bibliothèque Pt-de-Veyle 1.jpg
- File:Panneau village fleuri Perrex 5.jpg
- File:Panneau village fleuri Perrex 4.jpg
- File:Panneau village fleuri Perrex 2.jpg
- File:Panneau village fleuri Perrex 3.jpg
- File:Panneau village fleuri Perrex 1.jpg
- File:Panneau sortie Perrex 1.jpg
- File:Panneau sortie Perrex 2.jpg
- File:Panneau jumelage fibre Perrex.jpg
- File:Pont A40 St Genis Menthon 3.jpg
- File:Pont A40 St Genis Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Salle paroissiale St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Panneau ville fleurie St Cyr Menthon 2.jpg
- File:Panneau ville fleurie St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Mairie St Cyr Menthon 9.jpg
- File:Mairie St Cyr Menthon 8.jpg
- File:Mairie St Cyr Menthon 7.jpg
- File:Mairie St Cyr Menthon 4.jpg
- File:Mairie St Cyr Menthon 6.jpg
- File:Mairie St Cyr Menthon 5.jpg
- File:Mairie St Cyr Menthon 2.jpg
- File:Mairie St Cyr Menthon 3.jpg
- File:Mairie St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Cabinet médical St Cyr Menthon 2.jpg
- File:Cabinet médical St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Arrêt Auberge St Cyr Menthon 5.jpg
- File:Arrêt Auberge St Cyr Menthon 2.jpg
- File:Arrêt Auberge St Cyr Menthon 4.jpg
- File:Arrêt Auberge St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Bienvenue St Jean Veyle 1.jpg
- File:Bienvenue St Jean Veyle 2.jpg
- File:Bienvenue St Jean Veyle 3.jpg
- File:Scierie Corsant 2.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 10.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 9.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 8.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 7.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 5.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 6.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 4.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 2.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 3.jpg
- File:Escale St Jean Veyle 1.jpg
- File:Pont Mitterrand Saône 02.jpg
- File:Pont Mitterrand Saône 03.jpg
- File:Pont Mitterrand Saône 01.jpg
- File:Cinémarivaux 2.jpg
- File:Cinémarivaux 3.jpg
- File:Veyle Irance Mézériat.jpg
- File:Terrains polysports St Genis Menthon 6.jpg
- File:Terrains polysports St Genis Menthon 4.jpg
- File:Terrains polysports St Genis Menthon 5.jpg
- File:Terrains polysports St Genis Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Terrains polysports St Genis Menthon 3.jpg
- File:Terrain foot St Genis Menthon 2.jpg
- File:Terrain foot St Genis Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Silo St Genis Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Silo St Genis Menthon 2.jpg
- File:École St Genis Menthon 8.jpg
- File:École St Genis Menthon 7.jpg
- File:École St Genis Menthon 4.jpg
- File:École St Genis Menthon 3.jpg
- File:École St Genis Menthon 5.jpg
- File:École St Genis Menthon 1.jpg
- File:Cabine téléphone St Genis Menthon.jpg
- File:Sortie St Jean Veyle.jpg
- File:Moulin Marion 01.jpg
- File:Pont Veyle Moulin Gaillard 03.jpg
- File:Pont Veyle Moulin Gaillard 02.jpg
- File:Salle fêtes St Jean Veyle 01.jpg
- File:Stade municipal Péronnas 03.jpg
- File:Stade municipal Péronnas 01.jpg
- File:Stade municipal Péronnas 02.jpg
- File:Transcanal Palavas 02.jpg
- File:Transcanal Palavas 03.jpg
- File:Transcanal Palavas 01.jpg
- File:Salins Aigues-Mortes 21.jpg
- File:Salins Aigues-Mortes 17.jpg
- File:Salins Aigues-Mortes 02.jpg
- File:Port - Boulogne-sur-Mer.jpg
- File:Pont Renault.jpg
- File:Stade Pierre de Coubertin 2012.jpg
- File:Porte Marcel Bernard.jpg
- File:Court Philippe Chatrier 2012.jpg
- File:Stade Jesse Owens 02.jpg
- File:Stade Jesse Owens 01.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 05.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 04.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 15.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 16.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 13.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 14.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 12.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 11.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 10.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 09.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 06.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 07.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 08.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 01.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 03.jpg
- File:Stade Pavillon bleu 02.jpg
- File:Station météo Charnay-lès-Macon 07.jpg
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Tarbes Pyrénées Football.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
File:US Le Pontet.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Toulon Le Las FC.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Paris FC (avant 2002).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:OM (1935-72).svg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:SCO Angers (Avant 1994).svg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Ekinox.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
File:SM Caen (1934-1988).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Blason Dampierre-en-Bresse.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Salut,
J'ai repéré ou oubli de MAJ sur les arrondissements du Rhône, depuis la création de la métropole de Lyon ils ont été redécoupés de façon à ce que l'arrdt de Lyon corresponde à la métropole et l'arrdt de Villefranche correspond au Rhône. De même pour celle-ci. Cdlt, Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 20:56, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Le Pêcheur Palavas 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
83.204.242.96 22:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Carte langues régionales Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
Bonsoir, je me permet de t'écrire par rapport à une raison technique. J'ai crée la carte sur les langues régionales d'Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes (version d'origine : Langues régionales Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes.png) et j'ai vu que tu la reprise pour en faire un fichier vectoriel/svg, comment procèdes-tu ? Je fais beaucoup de cartes et j'aimerai faire de même. Cordialement. --Aavitus (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Le Pêcheur Palavas 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thesupermat (talk) 14:36, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Le Pêcheur Palavas 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thesupermat (talk) 14:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Remarque : il y a sans doute des exceptions sur fr.wiki pour ces statues, comme on peut en avoir par exemple pour des bâtiments récents. --Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 15:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Salut,
Sur cette carte il va falloir en effet faire des modifications pour tenir compte de la commune nouvelle de Fillière, dont une partie du territoire est visible (les * sur la liste suivante). Elle sera la fusion d’Aviernoz*, Evires, Les Ollières*, Saint-Martin-Bellevue* et Thorens-Glières. Si ça peut t'aider, une carte de la grande agglo ne tenant pas compte des communes nouvelles. --Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Maps Yosemite.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
(t) Josve05a (c) 00:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Nature in ...
Bonsoir,
Excusez-moi de poser une question peut-être idiote mais quel est l'intérêt précis de créer des catégories "Nature in ..." pour tout les villages de l'Ain ? Beaucoup de ces catégories ne contiennent qu'une autre catégorie qui aurait pu très bien rester encore dans la catégorie du village.
Cordialement.
Pmau (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Bravo
Salut,
Bravo et merci pour les catégorisations intensives que tu fais en ce moment.
Gloire à Category:Ain. L'endroit le mieux rangé de tout Wikimedia Commons.
Amitiés, --Benoît Prieur (d) 06:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- J'allais le dire, mais tu m'as devancé une fois de plus, Benoît. Je plussoie: super, Chabe01. --Classiccardinal (talk) 13:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Je dirais même plus: bravo Charly et vive Lalande.--Classiccardinal (talk) 14:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- Merci, je suis d'accord avec toi, vive Lalande ! Chabe01 (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- Merci mais c'est surtout grâce à toi que Category:Ain est comme il est aujourd'hui, c'est à dire fourni en photographies et bien classé. Chabe01 (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Chabe01: On tente de se voir pour boire un verre en cette fin décembre ? On fixe un rdv, je passe prendre le gars Classiccardinal et zou' ? Sur le principe tu es partant ? (ce serait quelque part ici).
- --Benoît Prieur (d) 17:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- Pour fin décembre, ça me tente, il n'y a aucun problème, je suis partant. Ce serait avec plaisir. Chabe01 (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- Cool. On trouve un créneau par mail. Je t'écris dans la journée. --Benoît Prieur (d) 06:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- En fait, j'ai oublié, tu as mon adresse mail parce que je n'ai rien reçu ? Chabe01 (talk) 16:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Cool. On trouve un créneau par mail. Je t'écris dans la journée. --Benoît Prieur (d) 06:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Pour fin décembre, ça me tente, il n'y a aucun problème, je suis partant. Ce serait avec plaisir. Chabe01 (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Dites donc, les gars, puisque je vous tiens... Vous qu'êtes bilingue: y'a-t-il une différence entre Category:Culs-de-lampe in Ain et Category:Corbels in Ain? A l’œil, c'est pas évident...--Classiccardinal (talk) 09:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Si je ne me trompe pas, en regardant sur la page anglaise de Wikipédia, culs-de-lampe n'existe pas en anglais. Corbels est la traduction anglaise de Culs-de-lampe, peut-être qu'il faudrait fusionner les deux. Chabe01 (talk) 11:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Il me semblait. Je te laisse faire?--Classiccardinal (talk) 11:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Finalement, je viens de trouver la différence entre les deux : Category:Culs-de-lampe est un type de Category:Corbels. J'ai ajouté Category:Culs-de-lampe in Ain en tant que sous-catégorie de Category:Corbels in Ain Chabe01 (talk) 11:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- OK, mais c'est quoi la différence?--Classiccardinal (talk) 11:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Finalement, je viens de trouver la différence entre les deux : Category:Culs-de-lampe est un type de Category:Corbels. J'ai ajouté Category:Culs-de-lampe in Ain en tant que sous-catégorie de Category:Corbels in Ain Chabe01 (talk) 11:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Il me semblait. Je te laisse faire?--Classiccardinal (talk) 11:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 10.jpg
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 11.jpg
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 3.jpg
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 4.jpg
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 5.jpg
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 52.jpg
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 6.jpg
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 7.jpg
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 8.jpg
- File:Château Loize St Cyr Menthon 9.jpg
Yours sincerely, Scoopfinder(d) 16:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Arrondissement Ambert Puy-de-Dôme 2017.svg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Arrondissement Ambert Puy-de-Dôme 2017.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Place Barre Mâcon 1.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Place Barre Mâcon 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Pérouges
Coucou Chabe01,
Tu vas bien ?
Juste pour te dire que Pérouges "Le Vieux" est assez bien mapillarisé [1]. Chaque image est envoyable en un click sur Commons (licence CC-By-SA). Peut-être que tu y trouveras des MH non illustrés.
++, --Benoît Prieur (d) 14:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Salut, je vais bien et toi ? Merci pour l'info, je vais essayer de voir ça. Pour les monuments historiques, j'ai découvert le site atlas.patrimoines.culture.fr. Je sais pas si tu connais, ça donne des infos sur les monuments historiques en complément de la base Mérimée, sa mise à jour est meilleure, les monuments historiques de 2016 y sont déjà indiqués. Ça m'a beaucoup aidé pour Pérouges. Néanmoins, il y a une erreur à Pérouges avec inversement de la Porte d'En-Haut et d'En-Bas. De plus, je ne sais pas comment faire pour certains monuments car trois sont indiqués comme Maison Thibaut, ce qui peut poser des problèmes pour les dénominations pour les bâtiments. Chabe01 (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Salut, tu as créé ce fichier et je t'en remercie puisqu'il n'y avait encore rien d'équivalent, ou alors illisible en raison du rajout des lignes de métro. Toutefois, il comporte au moins un manque, les départs pour le Parc Olympique Lyonnais (évènements occasionnels) ont lieu depuis un arrêt spécifique à quelques centaines de mètres au sud de l'arrêt Gare Part-Dieu Villette , justement nommé Gare Part-Dieu Villette Sud, comme l'indique exactement cette carte : http://carto.metro.free.fr/documents/CartoMetroTramLyon.v3.9.pdf . Pourrais-tu effectuer cet ajout ? Merci d'avance et bonne journée. Nonopoly (talk) 13:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Salut, merci de m'avoir informé de cet oubli, j'en ai profité pour corriger quelques erreurs sur le fichier et les autres lignes du tram Chabe01 (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
File:France départementale.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
90.20.77.29 09:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Inspiration Grand Palais Paris 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Court Philippe Chatrier 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:56, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Gare Suresnes Mont Valérien 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:58, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Château Loriol Confrançon 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Saint-Martin church of Bey
Do you have the .RAW file of Saint-Martin church of Bey? Email it to me at adamdaley@spin.net.au Adamdaley 00:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Façade sud Palais Bourbon Paris 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ferme Ferrand Vernoux 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument morts Cuisery 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument morts Cuisery 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Château Pt-de-Veyle 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument morts Mézériat 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Monument morts Servignat 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mhhossein talk 06:58, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Affiches élection présidentielle 2017 Villars Dombes 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
acagastya 📷 21:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Affiches élection présidentielle 2017 Villars Dombes 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
acagastya 📷 21:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Mairie Pont Ain 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
acagastya 📷 21:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Mairie Pont Ain 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
acagastya 📷 21:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Mairie Pont Ain 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
acagastya 📷 21:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Affiches élection présidentielle 2017 Villars Dombes 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
acagastya 📷 21:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Affiches élection présidentielle 2017 Villars Dombes 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
acagastya 📷 21:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Salut Chabe.
File:Monument aux morts Aranc 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Classiccardinal (talk) 05:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Affiches élection présidentielle 2017 Villars Dombes 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 13:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue Henri IV Charenton Pont 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plaque rue Morante Paris 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Repère nivellement rue Maréchal Leclerc St Maurice Val Marne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Borne colonne Brienne 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Croix Cimetière St Cyr Menthon 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vue Esparron Verdon 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sarcleuse regardant heure soleil Square Joubert Bourg Bresse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ferme Grange Clou St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 10.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 11.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 12.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 13.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 14.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 2.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 3.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 4.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 5.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 6.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 7.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 8.jpg
- File:Porteurs bennes Place Barre Mâcon 9.jpg
Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 12:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Belle photographie de panneau
Bonjour, c'est la plus belle photographie de panneau que j'ai vue (et j'en ai vu beaucoup). Peut-être vaudrait-il la peine de la proposer en image de qualité ? Cela pourrait faire sortir de l'ombre les images de panneau. Marc Mongenet (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, merci pour le compliment. Je viens de la proposer en image de qualité et elle est pour le moment acceptée? Chabe01 (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je ne comprends pas du tout le processus de décision pour les images de qualité. Marc Mongenet (talk) 00:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, pour proposer une image de qualité, il suffit de la proposer sur la page https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates. Certains approuvent ou désapprouvent, si elle est approuvée par un utilisateur et qu'aucun ne s'y oppose, elle est promue au rang d'image de qualité. Chabe01 (talk) 09:34, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panneau sortie St Martin Châtel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bravo. Et vu la masse de photos quelconque de Category:Quality images of road signs, je dirais que File:Panneau sortie St Martin Châtel 2.jpg est une photo remarquable. Cela dit, je ne connais pas les critères de Commons. Marc Mongenet (talk) 00:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panneau entrée St Romain Îles St Symphorien Ancelles 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
C109 et C110 à renommer en B54 et B55
Bonjour, selon la liste des signaux routiers français nouveaux, modifiés ou supprimés en 2008 : Les panneaux C109 et C110 sont supprimés. Ils gardent le même dessin, mais sont désormais des panneaux de prescription et sont codés B54 et B55. Il faudrait donc renommer les fichiers de Category:C109 (road sign, France) et Category:C110 (road sign, France), puis les recatégoriser dans Category:B54 (road sign, France) et Category:B55 (road sign, France). Marc Mongenet (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted content
File:Buste Berthier Louhans 1.jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 13:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour ! j'ai noté une erreur dans le nom d'une station de la future ligne T6. Il ne s'agit pas de Challement Lacour, mais Challemel Lacour. Est-ce possible de corriger ? Bonne suite ! Nonopoly (talk) 09:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, merci de l'information, l'erreur vient d'être corrigée. File:Plan tram Lyon.svg Chabe01 (talk) 18:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Croix Monastère Brou Bourg Bresse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Borne Km1 D879 Replonges 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panneau entrée Collégien 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
En passant
Bonjour Chabe01
Merci pour le travail de (re)classification que vous faites actuellement. C'est toujours un travail laborieux qui prend beaucoup de temps (cela m'arrive aussi de faire des recatégorisations sur d'anciennes catégories que j'ai crées ou sur des catégories que je croise de temps en temps).
Petite suggestion à propos de ce changement de nom de catégorie : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:School_of_Fleury-en-Bi%C3%A8re&diff=261914535&oldid=208662547
Ne pensez-vous pas que "Category:Schools in Fleury-en-Bière" serait préférable à "Category:School of Fleury-en-Bière" car je ne sais pas si l'école que j'ai photographiée est l'unique école de la commune ; il pourrait exister d'autres écoles (privées, professionnelles,...). Qu'en dites-vous ?
Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 15:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je comprends la question que vous vous posez car je me la pose souvent. J'ai pris cette initiative dans ce cas car j'avais vu qu'il n'existe qu'une école dans la commune. Cependant, je sais que rien ne dit que plus tard, la création d'une nouvelle école est possible. Cordialement, Chabe01 (talk) 17:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
category : transport in...
Bonjour Chabe01
Attention à certaines catégorisations concernant les gares. Ce n'est pas parce que le nom d'une gare est un nom composé de plusieurs noms de communes que la gare en question est située dans toutes les communes mentionnées dans le nom de la gare et, conséquemment, qu'il faille catégoriser la gare dans toutes les catégories "transport in..." (suivi du nom de la commune).
En fait, les noms des gares sont très anciens et sont issus de tractations entre les communes et les compagnies ferroviaires qui ont contribué au financement de la construction des gares. En général, une gare n'est située que sur le territoire d'une seule commune et, par conséquent, ce n'est que pour cette commune que l'on pourra ajouter la catégorie "transport in..." (je mets en gras le mot in pour sa traduction usuelle "dans" en français).
Il existe toutefois quelques rares cas où une gare est située à la limite de deux communes. C'est le cas par exemple de la gare de Gare de Lieusaint - Moissy. Auquel cas, cette gare peut en effet être catégorisée dans Category:Transport in Lieusaint (Seine-et-Marne) et dans Category:Transport in Moissy-Cramayel.
Mais cela ne sera pas le cas pour Category:Gare de Nemours - Saint-Pierre qui se situe uniquement dans le territoire de la commune de Saint-Pierre-lès-Nemours. Ainsi donc, on ne peut pas la catégoriser dans Category:Transport in Nemours.
A contrario, le cas de la gare de Moret - Veneux-les-Sablons est très intéressant.
Avant la création de la commune nouvelle de Moret-Loing-et-Orvanne, cette gare était située uniquement sur le territoire de la commune de Veneux-les-Sablons, et donc, ne pouvait pas être catégorisée dans Category:Transport in Moret-sur-Loing puisque la gare ne s'y situait pas. Mais depuis la création de la commune nouvelle (Moret-sur-Loing et Veneux-les-Sablons étant devenues des communes associées ; mais n'ayant pas disparues pour autant en tant qu'entités territoiriales), la gare peut être parfaitemement catégorisée dans Category:Transport in Moret-Loing-et-Orvanne.
Bien cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 18:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour Chabe01
- Je viens de comprendre la méprise au travers du cas de Category:Gare de Souppes - Château-Landon.
- En 2013, quelqu'un avait ajouté : Category:Château-Landon, ce qui n'est pas complètement faux puisqu'il y a un lien (même indirect) entre cette gare et le nom de la commune de Château-Landon. C'est vrai que cela reste discutable mais cela est l'usage de mentionner les nom des autres communes contenus dans le nom d'une gare.
- Je comprends alors que le remplacement de Category:Château-Landon en Category:Transport in Château-Landon pouvait faire sens. Mais cela n'était pas adéquat.
- Un exemple significatif est le cas de la gare de Villiers-le-Bel - Gonesse - Arnouville, située en grande partie sur le territoire de la commune d'Arnouville (alors que le nom de cette commune est indiquée en dernier dans le nom de la gare) et dont l'emprise au nord se situe en peu sur le territoire de Gonesse. C'est pour cela que Category:Buildings in Arnouville et Category:Buildings in Gonesse sont indiqués, et juste Category:Villiers-le-Bel et non Category:Buildings in Villiers-le-Bel car la gare en question (son bâtiment voyageurs, ses quais et ses emprises) n'est absolument située dans Villiers-le-Bel.
- Bien cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 01:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Merci. --Poudou99 (talk) 19:53, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Théâtre Bourg Bresse 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église St Antoine St Nizier Bouchoux 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Remarque à propos du Fichier:Tramway_Lyon_5_Tracé.svg
Bonjour,
Je tenais à signaler deux petites erreurs dans le nommage de deux stations de la ligne T5 du tramway de Lyon, qui du coup ont été aussi répercutées sur le plan du réseau entier de tramway (Fichier:Plan_tram_Lyon.svg).
- 1 : Hôtel de Ville - Bron, et non pas Bron - Hôtel de Ville
- 2 : Eurexpo, et non pas Euroexpo
Voilà, merci d'avoir réalisé tous ces plans pour le réseau TCL, c'est vraiment un super travail ! :-)
--Conige (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour, toutes les stations ont été corrigées (Hôtel de Ville - Bron, Croix-Luizet, Eurexpo) dans tous les fichiers. Merci de m'avoir signalé ces erreurs. Chabe01 (talk) 17:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
écrans SIEL
Bonjour Chabe01
Je viens d'annuler un certain nombres de vos catégorisations de photos vers les catégories : Category:Paris RER - SIEL Line A ou Category:Paris RER - SIEL Line B car :
- pour la gare de Chatelet-les-Halles, les photos en question montrent des écrans donnant des infos de la ligne D (voies 3, 4 ou Z) et non des infos de la ligne B ;
- pour la gare de Paris-Gare-de-Lyon, les photos en question montrent des écrans, situés dans la salle d'échange, pour les lignes D et A et non uniquement pour la ligne A.
Dans les 2 cas, il s'agit bien d'écrans SIEL de la RATP (et non d'écrans la SNCF), et dans les deux cas ces écrans sont dans des zones RATP et donc sont utilisés pour des infos des lignes A ou B de la RATP mais aussi pour des infos de la ligne D.
On ne peut pas à proprement parler d'écran "SIEL ligne D" (car la ligne D est entièrement une ligne SNCF) mais d'écran SIEL utilisés pour des infos de la ligne D.
C'est pour cela qu'à l'origine, ces photos ont été catégorisées simplement dans Category:SIEL (RER) dans précision de ligne.
Peut-être qu'une catégorie plus adéquate serait à créer.
Bien cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument morts Jullié 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Ste Marie Magdeleine St Mamert 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tour Horloge Gare Lyon Paris 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Avenue Alsace-Lorraine Bourg Bresse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame Chasselas 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grand Canyon Verdon Rougon 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lac Ste Croix Ste Croix Verdon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ferme Ferrand Vernoux 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chambre Commerce Lille 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ferme Tricot Vernoux 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Arrondissements d'Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
Bonjour, Les cartes ne sont pas à jour, a minima en raison de la modification des frontières des arrondissements du Rhône.
Pouvez-vous les corriger? Merci. --Jfblanc (talk) 08:44, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Statue Trulin Lille 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:51, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Statue Trulin Lille 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Statue Trulin Lille 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Statue Trulin Lille 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:54, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pavillon Flore Détail Palais Louvre Paris 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mairie Gournay Marne 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église St Cyr Menthon 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Pyramide Louvre Paris 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 06:15, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lavoir St Cyr Menthon 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Metro Paris 17 plan.svg
Les correspondances avec le RER D au Triangle de Gonesse et au PEX ne méritent plus d'être mentionnées, le projet de Barreau de Gonesse étant abandonné. Chris93 (talk) 20:57, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Minster Song School, Deangate, York has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue Constantin 1er York 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue Constantin 1er York 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Tour Montparnasse vue depuis Pont Iéna Paris 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
mikani (to talk) 16:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tour Clifford York 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vaches Parc Town Moor Newcastle Tyne 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oies Jardins Souvenir York 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue Constantin 1er York 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porte 7 place Baille Mâcon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Photos du métro de Lyon
Bonjour Chabe01,
Je viens de découvrir tes photos du métro de Lyon sur Wikimedia via une recherche Google Images. J'ai l'habitude de voir peu de photos récentes sur les pages Wikipédia du métro de Lyon, et là j'ai eu la surprise de découvrir un bon nombre de belles photos que tu as prises.
Mais je vois que ces photos n'ont pas été ajoutées sur des pages Wikipédia... accepterais-tu que je m'en charge et intègre ces photos sur les pages du métro de Lyon ? Je parle notamment des images de la station Bellecour, vu que la page de celle-ci est accompagnée de peu de photos et qui sont plutôt anciennes, ce alors qu'il s'agit d'une station centrale du réseau métropolitain.
Voilà, merci et bravo pour ton énorme travail photographique, et aussi tes plans des lignes TCL que je connaissais déjà ! :-)
Bonne semaine, Conige — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conige (talk • contribs) 22:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour Conige, merci du compliment, il n'y a pas de problème, tu peux te charger de mettre les photos sur les pages wikipédia ;) Chabe01 (talk) 09:01, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puits Ferme Grange Clou St Cyr Menthon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Colonnes Buren Cour Honneur Palais Royal Paris 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 21:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Colonnes Buren Cour Honneur Palais Royal Paris 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 21:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église St-Laurent-sur-Saône 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your obvious and mine are not the same
File:La Comelle, Nièvre - Cimetière 01.jpg and other requests are not obvious to all users as obvious errors. So maybe it comes to greater explanation or having the discussion with the uploader. Files should not be moved on factual errors without the evidence or the support of the uploader. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Monument Résistance Jura Lons Saunier 2.jpg
- File:Monument Résistance Jura Lons Saunier 3.jpg
- File:Monument Résistance Jura Lons Saunier 4.jpg
- File:Monument Résistance Jura Lons Saunier 5.jpg
- File:Monument Résistance Jura Lons Saunier 6.jpg
Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Modification des plans de transilien ,de métros et de rer
Je voudrais que tu améliores stp, l'affichage graphique de ces plans en mettant a jour les correspondances. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligne_C_du_RER_d%27%C3%8Ele-de-France#/media/File:Ligne_C,_sch%C3%A9ma_de_la_ligne.svg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/Ligne_L%2C_sch%C3%A9ma_de_la_ligne.png
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligne_N_du_Transilien#/media/File:Ligne_N,_sch%C3%A9ma_de_la_ligne.png
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligne_U_du_Transilien#/media/File:Ligne_U,_sch%C3%A9ma_de_la_ligne.svg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0e/RER_Paris_plan_ligne_B_2030.svg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ligne_C,_sch%C3%A9ma_de_la_ligne.svg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ligne_5_2030.svg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Metro_Paris_M5-plan.svg
AlexBurn44 (talk) 20:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame Avenas 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Espace paix St Cyr Menthon 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Route Bourg St Cyr Menthon 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tour Hermance 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panneau Clot Melly Forcalquier 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Modification des plans du T2
Je voudrais que tu améliores stp, l'affichage graphique de ce plan désastreuse de ce plan tout en mettant a jour les correspondances,stp.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tramway_Paris_T2-plan.svg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/40/Tramway_Paris_T2-planv2.svg
AlexBurn44 (talk) 00:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Bonsoir, voici enfin une nouvelle version du plan de la ligne 2 du tramway de l'Île-de-France : Plan Paris Tramway ligne 2-2006.svg. Chabe01 (talk) 20:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plaque route Bourg St Cyr Menthon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Monument morts Avallon 10.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 11.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 13.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 14.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 15.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 16.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 17.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 18.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 2.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 20.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 3.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 4.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 5.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 6.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 7.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 8.jpg
- File:Monument morts Avallon 9.jpg
Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 13:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument morts Ambronay 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Localisation EPCI Haut Bugey Agglomération dans l'Ain, 2019, France.svg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Localisation EPCI Haut Bugey Agglomération dans l'Ain, 2019, France.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Intercommunalités Ain 2019.svg
Template:File source/layout Jcb (talk) 18:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)