User talk:CLI/Archiwum 2012

pomoc przy odszyfrowaniu napisu na tablicy

Witaj, dopiero dziś zajrzałam po przeerwie na Wiki. Zdjecie jest mało czytelne. Ale na dole na współczesny rosyjski (zapis jest jeszcze starą pisownią sprzed refromy Вѣчная ему память - (typowa zapisana w jezyku cerkiewno-słowiańskim formuła nagrobna Вѣчная память / покой (кому)) to by było: Вечная ему память; nazwisko najprawdopodobniej: Нержило. Nie ma zdjęcia zrobionego nie pod kątem? Pozdrawiam. Krokus 164.127.56.247 10:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Na początku tablicy najprawdopodobniej jest: Тутъ спочиваетъ; imię może być Григорій. Krokus 164.127.56.247 10:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KhanAcademyLogo.png

File:KhanAcademyLogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GrapedApe (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa, Pałac Prezydencki, protest ACTA 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:08, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bachórz

A tak się trochę pobawiłem: File:Bachórz, kościół 01 cropped.jpg. Abstrahując od kolorów i panoramy - zdjęcie mniej żywe, ale nie bije po oczach - wystarczy nieco zmniejszyć poziomy wyjściowe. Powrzucaj co nieco jeszcze na QI. Przykuta → [edit] 15:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - w czym obrabiasz zdjęcia? Tu próbowałem odplamkować, File:Krasice, cerkiew-mod.jpg, ale z oryginału chyba dałoby się więcej wyciągnąć - nieco zbyt mocno podostrzyłeś, albo nasyciłeś. Przykuta → [edit] 16:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tu sam zobacz. Przykuta → [edit] 16:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A to na zdjęciu z cerkwi chyba to samo - zobacz na drzwi i spodnią część dachu po prawej - myślałem, że to efekt obróbki. Przykuta → [edit] 19:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Przemyśl

Nieco z innej beczki. Robiliście zdjęcia jakichś zabytków w Przemyślu? pl:Wikiprojekt:Wiki Lubi Zabytki/wykazy/województwo podkarpackie/Przemyśl. Przykuta → [edit] 21:22, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa, Wypożyczalnia 139, Jacek Hugo-Bader 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments great --Carschten 14:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wykorzystanie fotografii

Wykorzystałem zdjęcie Jacka Hugo-Badera w tekście "Co za człowiek, co za energia!". Dziękuję! [

Dzięki za informację. :) -- CLI (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arizona, Glen Canyon Bridge, highway 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice composition, but a bit soft. Did u still have the raw-file, maybe you can do some sharpening?--ArildV 20:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for feedback ArildV. ;) Does it look any better now after sharpening? --CLI 16:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC) Good now IMO.-ArildV 17:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco, Dodge Viper SRT-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Cayambe 07:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco, Harbour Queen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Iifar 20:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warsaw, Hublot Boutique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Powązki/Powązki Wojskowe

Witaj! Mam taką propozycję. Widzę że podobnie jak ja lubisz robić zdjęcia. Może warto byłoby się zając zrobieniem zdjęć z listy tej listy. Ja sam nie dam sobie z tym rady, nawet 2 osoby to za mało. Każda pomoc przy robieniu pomników na tych olbrzymich cmentarzach jest po prostu cenna. Ja obecnie od dana do 16 mam czas na robienie zdjęć jakby co.Lukasz2 (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nie dam rady się dopisać bo mam zablokowaną możliwość edycji haseł, a raczej nikt mnie nie odblokuje.Lukasz2 (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ostatnio ludzie dyskutowali na ten temat i nikt się nie ujął za mną ale jakbyś napisał do mnie na fb lub gg 5139946 to chętnie opisze co i jak.Lukasz2 (talk) 20:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dopiero wróciłem z pracy tak więc zrobię kolejne wersje 3-4 fotek z mniejszym ISO poza tym uzupełnię listę o nowe groby m in Józefa Cyrankiewicza. Ale już powoli schodzą te groby z listy Mastiego. jak tak dalej pójdzie to niedługo będziemy mieli 1 cmentarz z głowy. Lukasz2 (talk) 20:51, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jarosławiec kutry rybackie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good! --Keymeulen 15:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PZPNow

Wstaw ten plik do hasła Polski Związek Pięcioboju Nowoczesnego [[Plik:Siedziba Polskiego Związku Pięcioboju Nowoczesnego.JPG|thumb|Dodaj tutaj opis]] Lukasz2 (talk) 06:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bryce Canyon, Sunset Point 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seria 40

Właśnie dziś zrobiłem duża serię zdjęć jeśli masz trochę czasu to powstawiaj je do artykułów jest trochę z tym roboty ale dzięki temu lista mastiego zostanie zredukowana.Lukasz2 (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Przy okazji udobruchaj Bukaja by nie kasował fotek grobów z artykułów.Lukasz2 (talk) 13:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Germania - Bismarck Memorial in Berlin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuermelder - Berlin, Schloss Bellevue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Powązki

I dodałem kolejne zrobione przeze mnie fotki 4 może 5 jeśli dasz radę to powstawiaj je do artów.Lukasz2 (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Czersk (powiat mazowiecki), kościół zewnątrz 01.jpg

Nie wiem, jak się to stało, ale jest w kat. wikiekspedycja 2011 :) Przykuta → [edit] 22:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I jeszcze to wyłapałem File:WOŚP 2012 ArtBem, Camilia 02.jpg ;) Przykuta → [edit] 23:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco Farnsworth plaque photo

Pinned your photo of the Philo Farnsworth plaque on Green Street in San Francisco on Pinterest June 28, 2012. On view on my Board, "Events," @ September 7, 1927 -- Blue Gryphon

Thanks for the information. :) -- CLI (talk) 06:21, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

photo

Hi, I used your photo in PanOptyka, the newsletter of the Panoptykon Foundation, to illustrate the information about the changes in the law on gatherings. Here is the link: https://www.globmail.pl/pl/event/25313597/xabV6CWmAYGaPCrFJaYQ/4c222b83b4c5d67883322eee519c26776111af09 Best regards, Anna Obem Panoptykon

Dzięki za info. / Thanks for your information. :) -- CLI (talk) 19:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

W sprawie zdjęcia telewizora Lazuryt

Witaj,
Widziałam że udostępniasz zdjęcia na licencji CC włącznie z komercyjnym użyciem. Zależało by mi na kupieniu praw do zdjecia Lazurytu, do komercyjnego spotu, w cenie porównywalnej do kosztu shutterstocka. Czy jest taka możliwość? Pozdrawiam, Marta

Copyright status: File:Wikiekspedycja 2011, kamper.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wikiekspedycja 2011, kamper.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Daniel Message 12:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autor

[1] - Autor to Damian Swacińki, uploaded by CLI - nie powinno tam gdzieś być "ś"? USER:PMG 11:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Photo

Hello, I work as a curriculum developer in Seoul, South Korea. If it's alright, we'd like to use one of your photos of a flash mob in one of our textbooks. We hope to hear back soon!

Best, Kristin

Hi Kristin. Thanks for you information. Feel free to use any of my photos, just credit me as: Adam Kliczek / Wikipedia and mark the license CC BY-SA 3.0. Could you please send me a link to the page with the photo when it's done? I'd like to add it to my gallery. :) -- CLI (talk) 08:01, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image used....

outside Wikipedia in a freshman physics class. Ben Newling University of New Brunswick.

Thank you.

Copyright status: File:Stanisław Bareja tablica nagrobkowa.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stanisław Bareja tablica nagrobkowa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 14:35, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dziekuje --Jarekt (talk) 15:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category name

Hi CLI, I moved the categories from "Sony SAL-1118" to "Sony DT 11-18mm F4.5-5.6", "Sony SAL-70300G" to "Sony 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM" to standardize the category name of lenses as those in Category:Zoom lenses. I hope there will be no inconvenience. Regards, Prenn ⁞ Talk 04:06, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Towarzystwo Zaliczkowe w Brzozowie

Cześć. Publikowałeś na commons m.in. zdjęcia budynków z Brzozowa - tu podkategoria: . Czy masz może w swoich zasobach zdjęcie budynku w którym mieściło się Towarzystwo Zaliczkowe? Znalazłem w sieci zdjęcie z dawnych czasów dla orientacji: zdjęcie. O ile dobrze kojarzę, jest to obiekt przy głównym skrzyżowaniu, naprzeciw wjazdu na dworzec autobusowy. Jeśli masz wykonane jego zdjęcie to proszę opublikuj na commons.Pozdrawiam. --Lowdown (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ursynalia 2012, Ametria, Jakub Łuczak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Write English descriptions in your QIC pictures and nominations. --Kadellar 17:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Górowo Iławeckie, Muzeum Gazownictwa wnętrze 01.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:42, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nerwiki, pałac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krosno (pow. lidzbarski), zespół pielgrzymkowy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice -- Felix Koenig 14:29, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ursynalia 2012, Noko, Michał Zybert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 18:46, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arizona, Highway 64 East Rim Drive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy, but still good, and impressive. - A.Savin 14:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dudki, Wikiekspedycja 2012, Jagro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty good. --Mattbuck 17:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ursynalia 2012, Luxtorpeda, publiczność 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very unusual. Shame about the gum shield. --Mattbuck 17:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ursynalia 2012, Luxtorpeda, publiczność 01.jpg

Hej. Zdjęcie podoba mi się na tyle, że nominowałem do FP. Brakuje moim zdaniem czegoś takiego na commons. --sfu (talk) 17:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reusing image

The salsa-flash-mob image was used at Hurraki. An Easy-To-Read-Wiki.

Flashmob

Thanks a lot!

Thanks for information. :) -- CLI (talk) 16:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larus canus 2004 K ubt.jpeg

Hej. Dzięki za zainteresowanie! Niestety, jak widać po historii pliku, to już jest wyższa rozdzielczość (pierwsza załadowana wersja miała 750 × 322). Maksymalna rozdzielczość tego aparatu (Canon A60) wynosiła 1600 × 1200. W przypadku tego zdjęcia obciąłem górę i dół, mam jeszcze wersję pierwotną, ale rozdzielczości to nie zwiększy. Pozdrawiam, tsca (talk) 11:21, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WLZ powiaty koordynaty 2012.08.10.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:23, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beatty (Nevada), Main Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA removed : QI now imo. --JLPC 21:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grzegorz Proksa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bryce Canyon, Rim Trail 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow. --A.Savin 18:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glen Canyon Dam, Carl Hayden Visitor Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Marek Ząbczyk - Boruta.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - Boruta.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Marek Ząbczyk - Czarownica.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - Czarownica.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martiany, bunkier wnętrze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Mattbuck 15:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:CLI/Archiwum 2012

pomoc przy odszyfrowaniu napisu na tablicy

File:KhanAcademyLogo.png

Quality Image Promotion

Bachórz

Przemyśl

Quality Image Promotion

Wykorzystanie fotografii

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Powązki/Powązki Wojskowe

Quality Image Promotion

PZPNow

Quality Image Promotion

Seria 40

Quality Image Promotion

Powązki

File:Czersk (powiat mazowiecki), kościół zewnątrz 01.jpg

San Francisco Farnsworth plaque photo

photo

W sprawie zdjęcia telewizora Lazuryt

Copyright status: File:Wikiekspedycja 2011, kamper.JPG

Autor

Wikimedia Photo

Image used....

Copyright status: File:Stanisław Bareja tablica nagrobkowa.jpg

Category name

Towarzystwo Zaliczkowe w Brzozowie

Quality Image Promotion

File:Górowo Iławeckie, Muzeum Gazownictwa wnętrze 01.JPG

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

File:Ursynalia 2012, Luxtorpeda, publiczność 01.jpg

reusing image

File:Larus canus 2004 K ubt.jpeg

File:WLZ powiaty koordynaty 2012.08.10.png

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Copyright status: File:Marek Ząbczyk - Boruta.jpg

Copyright status: File:Marek Ząbczyk - Czarownica.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Navigation menu

Search