User talk:Lowdown

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lowdown!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Lowdown!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Adam Dutkiewicz w Dreźnie 07.06.2005.jpg was uncategorized on 22 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Szopena Street in Sanok view from Mickiewicza.jpg was uncategorized on 27 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Old catholic church Rozluch 2.jpg was uncategorized on 14 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MH Through TAOE.JPG

File:MH Through TAOE.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Motopark (talk) 20:26, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parkafoto

Hi, please tell me a reason, what the Parkafoto has to do with the polish film in zhe Category:07_zgłoś_się? Thank you in advance. --Peng (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote:Hello! The main charackter in this film wore this jacket while he was working as milician. I've gathered files, that concern this film, so as well this jacket. I hope, you don't have any opposition. --Lowdown (Diskussion) 11:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

No, I never mind. It s nice to see me as a part of a film ;-)--Peng (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lodowisko w Sosnowcu

Witaj, przykro mi, w najbliższym czasie ta prośba jest niewykonalna, ale będę pamiętał. Pozdrawiam! --Manfred Rackelhuhn (talk) 22:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zamkowa 16, Kuria Prawosławna, Sanok.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Villa "Dom Julii" in Sanok, Słowackiego Street 49.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:58, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Markowce

czy mógłbyś zaprzestać dodawania zdjęć które nie tylko ciebie kompromituję ale i okolice Sanoka, to co robisz jest bardzo przykre, np. dodanie tej rudery w Markowcach, Jurowcach itd do głównej przestrzeni, 2011.08.11

Po pierwsze - gdy się piszę do kogoś to wypada się podpisać a nie robić tego zupełnie anonimowo. Zatem nie wiem, kto odzywa się. Po drugie istnieją oficjalne oznaczenia zabytków, które dotyczą tych miejsc, więc chyba kompromituje się ten, kto nie ma o tym pojęcia. --Lowdown (talk) 12:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ty zamiast robić zdjęcia budowli znajdujących się po renowacji, wybierasz ruiny, którymi się nikt nie interesuje jak. np. w Markowcach, dlaczego nie zrobisz zdjęcia dworu, tylko jedną z wielu ruin w tej wsi, ???

A czy dwór nie jest czasem obecnie nieruchomością prywatną, gdzie nie można sobie ot tak wejść i zrobić zdjęcie? Co do ruin - proponuję przejrzeć listę obiektów uznane za zabytki, choćby na stronie Wiki Lubi Zabytki - byłe budynki gospodarcze we dworze są uznane za zabytki. Potrafisz to zrozumieć? Jeśli masz problem to aparat do ręki i wykonaj lepsze zdjęcia. --Lowdown (talk) 20:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no to mecenasie sam widzisz, że nie wszytko wolno, a to jest strona o Markowcach wsi, a nie o domniemanych zabytkach wsi, weź wywal te zdjęcia robione komórką, bo inni tak czy tak zrobią ze szkodą dla ciebie ...

Nie ośmieszaj się. Nie domniemanych tylko UZNANYCH za zabytki. I nie komórką - w metadanych sprawdź dane aparatu. Koniec dyskusji. Wszelkie dalsze przejawy bazgrołów, wulgaryzmów i szkodzenia zgłaszam jako powód do zablokowania cię. Bez odbioru. --Lowdown (talk) 20:10, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ta zrujnowana obora w Markowcach wiele o tobie mówi, rozumiesz ? ...13.08.2011

Odp: Zdjecie lodowiska w Toruniu

Prawdę mówiąc nie widzę sensu robienia zdjęć akurat temu obiektowi, ponieważ nie jest on ani wyjątkowy, ani wizualnie atrakcyjny. Pko (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WLM

Hallo Lowdown, bitte gib den Ländercode für deine Bilder in der WLM-Vorlage an, für Polen also {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2011|pl}}, sonst können sie nicht am Wettbewerb teilnehmen. Grüße --Bjs (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hej. W konkursie biorą udział pliki, które są ładowane między 1 a 30 września tego roku. Nie wszystkie, które były kiedykolwiek załadowane na Commons. Sam wrzuciłem w sierpniu ok. 200 plików zabytków. Może zamiast tego, użyj szablonu template:Zabytek. Pozdrawiam Przykuta → [edit] 19:53, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bez nerw. Po prostu nie doczytałeś, że konkurs dotyczy plików, które nie były do tej pory publikowane w regulaminie konkursu. Eh, nie ma się co złościć. Przykuta → [edit] 08:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ale przecież przygotowywanie konkursu nie polegało na ładowaniu fotek, tylko na sprawdzaniu co już mamy w Commons i robieniu list. Wszyscy urobiliśmy się po pachy. Eh, poza tym - on jest głownie kierowany dla osób z zewnątrz. Dobra, miałeś falstart (może to się da "odkręcić" - ja nie jestem tu szefem, ani nie jestem w jury). Ale po tobie po prostu jeszcze kilka osób zaczęło szablonować stare pliki... Dlatego pospieszyłem z wyjaśnieniem. Przykuta → [edit] 10:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

U, user:Kroton (m.in.) przygotowywał te listy z podkarpackiego. Przykuta → [edit] 11:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Lowdown,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 23:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pomnik Ofiar Grudnia 1970

Witaj. Tu jeszcze raz: to jest pomnik OFIAR GRUDNIA 1970 / Solidarność powstała po strajkach sierpniowych 1980 na Wybrzezu / pomnik powstal jedynie z inicjatywy Solidarnosci i NIE JEST jej jako związkowi i ruchowi poświęcony. A tu cytat Żebyś nie miał wątpliwości "... Krzyże, symbol cierpienia, upamiętniają trzech pierwszych zabitych przez MO i Ludowe Wojsko Polskie stoczniowcow. Spinające je kotwice to znak nadziei, nawiązanie do lat 1956,1970 i l976. Stoczniowcy czekali na upamiętnienie poległych kolegów dziesięć lat. Mimo obietnic złożonych na początku 1971 r. władze PRL nie zgodziły się na jakiekolwiek formy upamiętnienia." Podobnie ma się rzecz z pomnikiem w Gdyni - jest to również pomnik ofiar Grudnia 1970. Ani pomnik w Gdańsku ani ten w Gdyni nie są pomnikami Solidarności ani dla Solidarności tylko pomnikami Ofiar Grudnia - Twoja błędna kategoria przeinacza fakty historii najnowszej. Usuwam ponownie błędną kategorię. pozdr 80.171.89.199 21:56, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fotki z Krosna

Hej. Dzięki za usunięcie z moich krośnieńskich fotek niepotrzebnej kategorii Category:Independence Day 2011 in Warsaw – zapomniałem wywalić z poprzedniej sesji Commonista. ;) -- CLI (talk) 10:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KNŻ

Dzięki za pokategoryzowanie, jakoś nie mogłem się do tego zabrać... Litzę zaraz dorzucę. Aotearoa (talk) 12:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dodałem jeszcze siedem zdjęć. Aotearoa (talk) 12:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Odnowiciela Pobiedziska

Witam. Dlaczego zlikwidowałeś dwie kat. w tym pliku? Pzdr. MOs810 (talk) 15:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fotografie

plakatów, posterów, banerów etc. to dzieła pochodne tychże, dlatego nie nabywa się PA do nich, przez sam fakt reprodukowania ich fotograficznie. Masur (talk) 16:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Banery nie stanowią w nich centrum kompozycji, ani nie było zamiarem fotografa ukazanie ich (jedno skasowałem). Masur (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tworzenie kategorii dla własnych ilustracji

Cześć. Nie bardzo rozumiem - dlaczego do założenia kategorii miałem skorzystać z pomocy bota? Założyłem ją, jak dziesiątki innych, następnie dodałem ją do wszystkich swoich zdjęć - i to tyle :) Pozdrawiam, pjahr @ 21:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ręcznie, jak najbardziej. pjahr @ 21:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Błędne kategorie i lansowanie swojej wersji historii

Dzień dobry. Zgłosiłem właśnie dwa poniższe zagadnienia do polskojęzycznych adminów commons. Zauważyłem, że także Pan miał problemy z przytaczanym przeze mnie poniżej userem. Podejrzewam że to co odkryłem przez przypadek jest tylko czubkiem góry lodowej tego co "stworzył" pod swoim nickiem, pacynkami i IP zaczynającymi się od 46. Jeżeli Pan również coś podobnego znalazł to proszę o kontakt. pozdr

Category:Personifications of Poland

W tej kategorii jako 3 i 4 plik znajdują się plakat niemieckich nazistowskich władz okupacyjnych w Polsce i propagandowy plakat niemiecki z okresu plebiscytu na G. Śląsku - żaden z nich nie jest ani personifikacją ani też symbolem Polski tylko propagandystycznym narzędziem twórcy plakatu. Pliki 6,7,8,9 są znaczkami pocztowymi Generalnej Gubernii - wymowa ideologiczna tych znaczków to "Goralenvolk - Germanie" i blonwłosi Polacy to potomkowie "Germanów". Przypisujący te pliki do owej kategorii (jako użytkownik zalogowany wielonickowiec z pacynkami i IP) wielokrotnie sprawił już sporo kłopotów na wiki.pl, wiki.en i wiki.de stosując własne "prawdy" oparte na "źródłach" pseudonaukowych. Zwróciłem mu kilka razy uwagę, niestety spotkałem się z agresją i obrazą. Bardzo proszę o zwrócenie uwagi na przytoczone przeze mnie przykłady.

Category:Polish areas annexed by Soviet Union

Dotyczy tego samego użytkownika co wyżej. [1], [2] i [3] dokonał kolejnego revertu wg własnej wizji historii. Obszary te po ataku na ZSRR nigdy nie zostały zaanektowane przez III Rzeszę, zawsze miały status obszarów zajętych (po niemiecku Besetzte Gebiete). Użytkownik nie widzi różnicy pomiędzy "okupacją a aneksją", "Besetzung a Annexion", "Military occupation a Annexation" i świadomie wprowadza sfoją wersję historii opartą na fałszu. Obawiam się, że niestety jest to czubek przysłowiowej góry lodowej i pod swoimi wieloma nickami "zasiał" na commonsie więcej takich "kwiatków". 77.187.26.183 11:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję bardzo za odpowiedź. Również zauważyłem, że strasznie miesza i manipuluje. Niestety poziom mojego angielskiego nie pozwala na prowadzenie merytorycznej konwersacji z adminem angielskojęzycznym, dlatego też zwróciłem się o pomoc do adminów polskojęzycznych. Jestem na 99,9% pewny że pacynki "CategoryManager", "EinPole", "Ubuking", IP 46.174.24.10 to ten sam user ... a z pewnością to jeszcze nie wszystko. pozdr. 77.187.26.183 12:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okopisko

Silar, podałes definicję okopiska w wikipedii, ale czy widzisz że jest tam napisane, że w woj. podkarpackim ma to neutralne odniesienie?? Po co się tego czepiasz? Podalem tyle zrodel, a istnieje wiecej jeszczze a ty widzisz problem. Nazwe stosują wszyscy - naukowcy, historycy, mieszkancy, wladze i nikt nie ma z tym problemu. Stworzyles bzdurną kategorię "square at Jagiellonska" - a przeciez poza tym że to bzdura, to ten park nie jest kwadratem, ani tez nie jest jedyny w swoim rodzaju bo przy Jagiellonskiej są inne... Ty ignorujesz to co chcesz ignorowac. Dlaczego zawsze olewasz dyskusję z uzytkownikami, kasujesz ich wpisy, ale kiedy sam widzisz problem to wydaje ci sie że wszyscy maja ci odpowiadac. Tylko że twoje dzialania na projektach wiki pokazują co potrafisz i jakie są twoje edycje. Ostatecznie nie masz odwagi podpisac sie swoim jednym loginem tylko dzialasz pod wieloma. --Lowdown (talk) 15:46, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please write it down only in english, you write very good. 17:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC) xxx

Sanok Dąbrówka

Cześć...

Mógłbyś mi wyjaśnić jak to z tym Sanokiem Dąbrówką jest? Zrobiłem kategorię Sanok Dąbrówka, aby zdjęcia tego przystanku nie wisiały bezpośrednio w Train stations in Sanok. Wydaje mi się, że ta kategoria jest ok i szczerze mówiąc trochę nie rozumiem twojego opisu zmiany... --Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 17:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki. --Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring around categories

Hi Lowdown, I noticed some edit-warring going on in File:00876 Archäologischen Ausgrabungen auf dem Michaelerplatz vor der Pfarrkirche in Sanok. Zustand am 15 Mai 2012.JPG and File:Sanok 4 castle.JPG where you were involved. How justified your edits appear to you, the continuation of an edit war is never appropriate. I suggest to go to the corresponding talk pages for a discussion, possibly inviting comments from other users, too. And if this problem persists, a discussion can be opened at one of the administrative boards. In both cases, I've protected the images for a month in the most recent version without any consideration which variant could be the better one. I think that it is most important now to talk about the categorization to find a consensus, possibly with the help of others. Thanks for your understanding and kind regards, AFBorchert (talk) 12:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lodowisko

OK, wrzucę gdy będę w kraju, zdjęcia mam na stacjonarnym. Yarl ✉ 20:16, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lodowisko w Krynicy

Niestety, nie mam zdjęcia lodowiska. Byłem tam tylko turystycznie. Andrzej Otrębski (talk) 20:42, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia grobów

Cześć zauważyłem że dodajesz fotografie grobów czy mógłbyś dodać także i te? [[Plik:Zygmunt Słomiński grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Zygmunta Słomińskiegona Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Adam Pakulski grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Adama Pakulskiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Aleksander Bernatowicz grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Aleksandra Bernatowicza na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Aleksander Sobiszewski.JPG|thumb|Aleksander Sobiszewski]] [[Plik:Antoni Strzałecki grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Antoniego Strzałeckiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Bolesław Leszczyński pomnik.JPG|thumb|Pomnik Bolesława Leszczyńskiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Bolesław Leszczyński Wincenty Rapacki grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Bolesława Leszczyńskiego i Wincentego Rapackiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Cecylia Śniegocka grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Cecylii Śniegockiej na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Hanna Nałkowska grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Hanny Nałkowskie na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Jan Miklaszewski grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Jana Miklaszewskiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Kajetan Sawczuk grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Kajetana Sawczuka na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Lech Pijanowski grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Lecha Pijanowskiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Lesław Wacławik grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Lesława Wacławika na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Maria Krüger grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Marii Krüger na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Ryszard i Aleksander Sobiszewscy grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Ryszarda i Aleksandra Sobiszewskich na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Stanisław Szober grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Stanisława Szobera na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Wincenty Rapacki pomnik.JPG|thumb|Pomnik Wincentego Rapackiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[Plik:Wojciech Rutkowski grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Wojciecha Rutkowkiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [[User:Lukasz2|Lukasz2]] ([[User talk:Lukasz2|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 13:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC) Wielkie dzięki czy mógłbyś dodać to zdjęcie do artykułów Jerzy Wasowski i Józef Wasowski ponieważ w obu figuruje i9nny zły grób. Błąd powstał przy opisywaniu zaciął mi się komputer i poszło ze złym opisem [[User:Lukasz2|Lukasz2]] ([[User talk:Lukasz2|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:22, 19 July 2012 (UTC) [Plik:Jerzy Wasowski grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Jerzego Wasowskiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]] [Plik:Jerzy Wasowski grób.JPG|thumb|Grób Józefa Wasowskiego na Cmentarzu Powązkowskim]]

Pomnik Smoleński

W przyszłym tygodniu zrobię. Dziś zrobiłem fotkę Kulejowi. Tymczasem jak możesz pododawaj fotki które zrobiłem dziś do artykułów.Chciałbym mieć czystą listę na przyszły tydzień.Z samych Powązek Wojskowych niewiele zostało do zrobienia chyba że ludzie zaczną umierać. Jeśli możesz podaj do siebie jakiś kontakt poza stroną dyskusji. Lukasz2 (talk) 20:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Za chwilę opublikuję fotki ze Smoleńska.Lukasz2 (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia opublikowałem dodatkowo zrobiłem jeszcze kilka innych grobów które trzeba by wstawić do artykułów jakbyś dał rade byłoby super.Lukasz2 (talk) 11:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Renety

Mam jeszcze takie 3 fotki które znalazłem do wstawienia jak dasz radę to wstaw je. http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanda_Krahelska [[Plik:Wanda Krahelska grób.JPG]] http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrzej_Piszczatowski [[Plik:Andrzej Piszczatowski grób.JPG]] http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdon_Stryszak [[Plik:Abdon Stryszak Franciszek Maciak rób.JPG]] Lukasz2 (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Powązki

Wykonałem kolejną serię fotek. Jeśli możesz dodaj je do artykułów. Łatwiej będzie robić kolejne po oczyszczeniu listy.Lukasz2 (talk) 15:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

46.174.26.245

Nie karm trolla... :) [4] Matma Rex (talk) 16:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Okopisko

Przepraszam Cię najmocniej, ale jestem teraz na wakacjach, mam wprawdzie internet w hotelu, ale edytowanie tutaj jest mocno utrudnione. Może Masur lub inny polskojęzyczny admin będzie w stanie pomóc, sorry jeszcze raz i dzięki za zrozumienie. Powerek38 (talk) 20:10, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sprawdziłem w TERYT i na mapach topograficznych i nie widać na niej nazwy Okopisko. Nie neguję, że taka nazwa jest powszechna wśród mieszkańców być może. Ale nie znalazła potwierdzenia na mapach, a to już jest jakiś znak. Obszar między ul. Jagiellońską a ul. Schody Balowskie jest określany jako część miasta "Balowskie". Jeżeli już by powstała jakaś kategoria na pewno nie Okopisko at Jagiellońska Street in Sanok tylko Category:Okopisko (Sanok). Chciałbym zwrócić uwagę, że nazwę Okopisko ma też bliżej nieokreślony obszar (lasek, łąka) w mieście Rymanów w woj. podkarpackim. Serio trudno mi coś powiedzieć na temat tej nazwy ponieważ nie widzę literatury, ale na pewno jest nazwa bardzo potoczna. Więcej czasu trudno mi znaleźć by zająć się taką sprawą. JDavid (talk) 16:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marian Rejewski

Przeglądam spis pochowanych i wykryłem błąd. pl:Marian Rejewski nie jest Pochowany na Powązkach Starych tylko na Wojskowych czy zechciałbyś to poprawić?Lukasz2 (talk) 21:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Artur Ziętek

Hej! OK, ale najwcześniej w drugiej połowie listopada, bo w Radomiu jedynie bywam kilka-kilkanaście razy w roku. Pzdr Mzungu (talk) 18:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Lowdown,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Towarzystwo Zaliczkowe w Brzozowie

Hej. Niestety tego budynku sobie nie przypominam. Wszystkie zdjęcia z Wikiekspedycji 2011 zostały już załadowane, więc obawiam się, że nie sfotografowaliśmy go. -- CLI (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zabytki

Dzień dobry. Biorąc pod uwagę Pański wkład wnioskuję, że jest Pan z Sanoka. Czy mógłby Pan w chwili wolnego czasu sprawdzić to "[5]", w dyskusji moderatora "jarekt" [6] poruszyłem problem braku wpisu w rejestrze. Może istnieje jakiś numer rejestru dla całokształtu obiektów występujących na tych cmentarzach ? Z odwiedzin przeróżnych cmentarzy wiem że istnieją tablice z dokładną informacją dotyczącą numeru w rejestrze. Do tej pory nikt jeszcze nie wpadł na taki pomysł żeby pojedyńcze nagrobki grupować w kategorie i szablonować datą decyzji bez numeru. Dziękuję z góry za ewentualną pomoc. 80.171.88.243 14:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anfield-The Kop.JPG

File:Anfield-The Kop.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 13:54, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kategoryzowanie polityków

Dziękuję za informację. Postaram się nie powtarzać tych błędów. z poważaniem Jarosław Kruk JoRK/ Jrkruk --JoRK (talk) 15:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Category:Events in Busko-Zdrój

OK!, dziękuję :)

--Jrkruk (talk) 23:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Zdjęcia z Jarosławia

Cześć, Obecnie nie przebywam w Jarosławiu, ale jak tylko będę w mieście to porobię zdjęcia o które prosiłeś. Jak masz jeszcze jakieś propozycje, to przygotuj listę, postaram się wszystko umieścić. Pozdrawiam Mcdrwal (talk) 20:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć dodałem zdjęcia, o które prosiłeś

Pozdrawiam Mcdrwal (talk) 18:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kradzione zdjęcia z Commons

Fundacja Wikimedia oraz Stowarzyszenei Wikimedia Polska nie zajmują się reprezentowaniem autorów publikujących na Commons, ani nie pośredniczą, czy pomagają w ewentualnych roszczeniach, stąd nie ma żadnych oficjalnych mechanizmów, ani innych narzędzi do tego celu. Szablony czy coś może są podlinkowane w tych okolicach Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia, ale wątpię czy będzie coś po polsku.

Od siebie mogę powiedzieć, że ja zwykle prywatnie interweniuje (oczywiście tylko w sprawie moich fotek), pisząc po prostu mejl od siebie, i w 50% pomaga. W pozostałych macham na to ręką, ale jakby chodziło o coś grubego to nie wahałbym się wystąpić na drogę sądową - np. ostatnio odkryłem swoje zdjęcie na okładce bardzo szacownego czasopisma naukowego. Ale w tym wypadku udało mi się wytlumaczyć o co chodzi z wolnymi licencjami. A fakt, że wychodzi ono jeszcze drukiem i tam oczywiście nie mogli poprawić swojego błędu to już odpuściłem. Masur (talk) 06:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gardens_and_parks_in_in_Sanok

Category:Gardens_and_parks_in_in_Sanok has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

HaB >talk< 06:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Lowdown! Please don't add the category duplicate by hand. use the template, please. Thanks! :-))

Forgot: Category:Grave of Pulcheria Ładyżyński you added duplicate in 3 similar named categories. Which one is correct? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ludwik Ehrlich.JPG

File:Ludwik Ehrlich.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sinbad the sailor (talk) 14:24, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Memorial plaque to Anastazy Pankiewicz in Nagórzany 2013a.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Memorial plaque to Anastazy Pankiewicz in Nagórzany 2013a.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lowdown, I have just deleted a bunch of categories that you tagged with Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. This is a top-level maintenance category. It would make my job a bit easier if you'd use a tagging template like {{Speedy}} or {{Badname}} next time. Cheers! --Dschwen (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pomnik

Niestety :( Ani zbliżenia, ani wyraźniejszej fotki. Nemo5576 (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banner of franciscan in Franciscan Church in Sanok.jpg

File:Banner of franciscan in Franciscan Church in Sanok.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Kinga banner SP 2 in Sanok.jpg

File:Saint Kinga banner SP 2 in Sanok.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gimnazjum nr 2 w Sanoku banner.jpg

File:Gimnazjum nr 2 w Sanoku banner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:JRKRUK 20131110 CEZARY GMYZ BUSKO DSC01608 on.jpg

Witam,

dziękuję za pochwałę, ale chyba nie wpełni na nią zasługuję ;) - zdjęcie może jest ciekawe jako kadr, ale fatalne jeśli chodzi o światło - robiłem przy kiepściunim świetle 10 letnim cyfrzakiem... Ile umiałem tyle go udoskonaliłem - nie potrafię lepeij - jeśli wiesz jak je podrasować to proszę pomóż :)

pozdrawiam

--Jrkruk (talk) 09:50, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Budynek ul. Konopnicka 3 w Warszawie

Witaj jakiś czas temu pytałeś (łaś) o zdjęcie budynku przy ul Konopnickiej 3 w Warszawie - załadowałam dzisiaj dwie kategorie 3-5,_Konopnickiej_Street_in_Warsaw oraz drugą Office_of_Polish_Association_of_Ice_Hockey_in_Warsaw - może któreś z tych nowych zdjęć będzie przydatne w artykule o Polskim Związku Hokeja na Lodzie. Pozdrawiam serdecznie --Jolanya Dyr (talk) 14:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Lowdown⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ryszard Linscheid with horse.JPG

And also:

File:Ryszard Linscheid.JPG

Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 10:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Lowdown,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wzajemna zamiana nazw File:Władysław Skwarc.jpg i File:Władysław Kudlik.jpg

Prościej mi pisz, bo mi się nie chce analizować trzech warstw informacji w twoim wpisie. Czyli:

Plik:A zamień nazwę na B.

Ty dbasz o zmianę w hasłach. Masur (talk) 07:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Łukasz Ciepliński, Rzeszów.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Łukasz Ciepliński, Rzeszów.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edward Wania.JPG

File:Edward Wania.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 21:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zawoja-Wełcza

Niestety w Wełczy nie byłem, ale pewno będę na wiosnę, to uzupełnię zdjęcia. Selso (talk) 15:33, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arena Sanok, banner Worldwide Meet of Sanok City Dwellers 2014b.jpg

File:Arena Sanok, banner Worldwide Meet of Sanok City Dwellers 2014b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 12:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Autosan exhibition at Arena Sanok (June 2014) info.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sokołów

Cześć. Niestety, teraz bardzo rzadko bywam na Rzeszowszczyźnie. Wszystko, co w miarę nadawało się na Commons, już wrzuciłem. Panek (talk) 22:53, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Odp:Biega

Nie ma sprawy jak tylko będzie pogoda to zrobię dziś byłem ale baterie mi siadły i muszę naładować. Swoją dorgą jak mozesz to przejrzyj I powstawiaj fotki do wiki łatwiej mi będzie robić kolejne foty po wykreśleniu/zaznaczeniu tego co zrobione.Lukasz2 (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nagrobki

Witaj! Dziś zorbiłem parę zdjęć jesli masz możliwości skasuj prosze fotografię grobu premiera oleksego bo po prostu się nie ładuje w całości. Jak będe jechał przez powązki to napewno zrobię fotkę tej rodziny.Lukasz2 (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A i jeszcze jedno na mojej stronie użytkownika na commons jest lista z powązek starych. Jak chcesz bym coś zrobił to śmiało dopisuj tam propozycje Remera znalazłem gorzej z Mackiewiczem. Lukasz2 (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mam taki pomysł abyś jesli masz chwilę czasu pouzupełniał moją lub stworzył listę haseł do zilustrowania (ja za bardzo z tym nie wyrabiam). Wówczas wybiorę się na cmentarz powązkowski zrobię wszystko za jednym razem. Poza tym pojadę tam raczej w marcu lub kwietniu bo muszę kupić nowy aparat (ten mi szwankuje). Jakby co z User:Mateusz Opasiński też się tym zajmuje więc myśle ze I do niego możesz uderzyć z tym pomysłem. Lukasz2 (talk) 09:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC) Zrobiłem dziś parę zdjęć, ale na chybił- trafił szukałem Twoich propozycji ale nie miałem dokładnych adresów przez co nie natrafiłem ale jeszcze pójdę jak śniegi opadną.Lukasz2 (talk) 13:33, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Witaj! Czy możesz dodać zdjęcia nagrobków, które zrobiłem przez ostatnie 2 dmi na Powązkach. Grób rodziny Biega zrobiłem, ale pozostałe poczekają na lepszą pogodę bo groby były zaśnieżone. Lukasz2 (talk) 17:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC) Dałbyś radę na necie znaleźć jakieś zdjęcie z pogrzebu Tomaszewskiego bo jak w przyszłym miesiącu pojadę to chciałbym zlokalizować i zrobić grób.Lukasz2 (talk) 17:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Romuald Wiadrowski.

Cześć. Nie mam zbliżenia. Jak zrobię dam znać. Januszk57 (talk) 19:10, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cmentarz Rakowicki

Witaj, Z tej listy groby wielu osób mam. Brakuje tylko czasu żeby wrzucić je na commons. Zrobić zdjecia to też tylko problem czasu. Niekiedy znalezienia grobu (mimo, że Zarząd Cmentarzy Komunalnych ma dość dokładną wyszukiwarkę) jest trudne, zniszczony albo źle opisany. Obiecałem kilka zdjęć dla D'Arnise i jeszcze trzech nie znalazłem. Postaram się coś z tej listy wrzucić. Przepraszam, że dopiero teraz odpowiadam. Pozdrawiam. Z Zetpe0202 (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re. "Cmentarz Rakowicki"

Dzień dobry! Kiedy będę miał trochę czasu aby się wybrać na Rakowice i porobić parę zdjęć to niezwłocznie je umieszczczę w w.w. biogramach. Pozdrawiam! Mach240390 (talk) 18:00, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adam Koss (chemist).JPG

Czy mógłbyś wskazać, gdzie to zdjęcie zostało opublikowane przed 23 maja 1994? Szablon {{PD-Polish}} dotyczy wyłącznie zdjęć opublikowanych.
Zdjęcia zamieszczane na Commons jako PD muszą być PD nie tylko w Polsce, ale także w USA. A w USA nieopublikowane zdjęcia anonimowych fotografów stają się PD dopiero po 120 latach od ich zrobienia. Jeśli nie jesteś w stanie wskazać ani miejsca publikacji, ani daty śmierci autora, ani nie dysponujesz pisemną zgodą aktualnego posiadacza praw autorskich do tego zdjęcia na jego opublikowanie na wolnej licenji, zdjęcie zostanie usunięte. Ankry (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dotyczy to także:

i prawdopodobnie wielu innych zamieszczonych przez ciebie zdjęć. Ankry (talk) 21:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment : Ankry, en:DMCA, czyli prawo USA w temacie, wyraźnie zezwala na wykluczenie materiałów z pod praw autorskich przez zasoby umieszczone w archiwum, a ~~NEC~~ NAC [03:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)] właśnie nie tylko stanowi archiwum, ale nawet archiwum państwowe. IMHO prawo USA zezwala na traktowanie na licencji PD w tym przypadku (czyli, wszelakich nieopublikowanych mediów anonimowego autorstwa umieszczonych w archiwum i odniesionych/uźródłowionychnych tamże przez wiki[mp]edystów). --Mareklug ^talk 03:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nie wykluczam, jednak proszę cię abyś wskazał odpowiedni przepis, na który się powołujesz (że zasoby archiwów nie są chronione przez PA w USA - są w domenie publicznej) lub jego interpretację przez prawników. Jednak, jeśli nawet tak jest, użyłeś niewłaściwego szablonu licencji. Na commons wymagamy zagwarantowania przez zamieszczającego, że nikt nie jest uprawniony zgłosić zastrzeżenia odnośnie naruszenia jego PA, a nie jedynia "bycia krytym" poprzez uniknięcie odpowiedzialności w razie, gdyby ktoś takie zastrzeżenie w przyszłości zgłosił (patrz COM:PRP). Zasoby Commons są przeznaczone do ponownego wykorzystania i narażanie innych, że wykorzystanie zdjęcia z commons narazi ich na kłopoty nie jest w naszym interesie. Dlatego z zasady nie zamieszczamy na Commons zdjęć, których status prawny jest niejasny.

Na pewno w przypadku użycia {{PD-Polish}} trzeba wykazać wcześniejszą publikację tych zdjęć (materiałów niepublikowanych przed 1994 rokiem ten szablon nie dotyczy)

W kwestii przechodzenia materiałów do domeny publicznej wyznacznikiem jest obecnie COM:Hirtle chart i jeżeli mamy do czynienia z sytuacją nieobjętą przez tę tabelkę, to trzeba sprawę PA dokładnie uzasadnić. W przeciwnym razie prędzej czy później ktoś te materiały usunie w oparciu o COM:PRP

Jeżeli zdjęcia nie były publikowane przed rokiem 2000, może jeszcze wchodzić w grę kwestia prawa NAC jako tzw. prawa pierwszej publikacji (Art. 99¹ polskiego PA). Jesteś w stanie zapewnić innych użytkowników, że NAC tym prawem nie dysponuje lub nie zamierza go egzekwować?

Ankry (talk) 10:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wygląda na to, że odnośnie PD możesz mieć rację. Co do szablonu, postaram się wyjaśnić jaki byłby właściwy; być może trzeba będzie poprawić treść {{PD-Polish}}. Żednych gwałtownych ruchów w każdym razie nie robimy. Ankry (talk) 20:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Odszczekuję komentarz. ;) Po wnikliwej rozmowie z Ankrym na kanale pl:Internet Relay Chat #wikimedia-commons, wygląda na to, że o ile zasoby archiwum nie są objęte prawami autorskimi w USA, powielanie zasobów (a nie samo odniesienie do zasobów) przez osoby trzecie, owszem, jest, aczkolwiek sformuławania tekstualne samego lex są na tyle osobliwe, że ani ja ani mój rozmówca nie podejmujemy się pi-razy-oko afirmacji tak czy siak. Czyli, jest to temat to zweryfikowania przez użytkownika/Lowdowna i prawników Wikimedii lub co najmniej żmudnego pianobicia po kawiarenkach. ;) --Mareklug ^talk 03:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ankry: i @Mareklug: : Dzięki za Wasze uwagi. Wygląda to tak, że nie ja jedyny publikowałem dla przykładu ilustracje pochodzące z zasobów NAC, zatem byłoby najlepiej wyklarować tę sytuację. Albo wskazać szablon licencji, który uprawnia do publikowania tutaj, albo też uznać, że jest to niedopuszczalne. Dotychczas zostało "wrzuconych" na Commons wiele ilustracji z NAC. Lowdown (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jugosławia

Witaj,

Czy orientujesz się może jaki jest status zdjęć oficjeli byłej Jugosławii i jej republik: prezydentów, premierów. Chodzi mi o oficjalne wytwory ich urzędów, gdzie można podać, że źródłem jest np.: biuro premiera SFR Jugosławii ? Pozdrawiam. Z Zetpe0202 (talk) 11:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NAC

Wybacz ale jeszcze jedno pytanie: czy można zamieszczać w Wikipedii zdjecia z NAC, odpłatnie, bezpłatnie? Z Zetpe0202 (talk) 11:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Powązki z zamówienia

Hej! Twoje zlecenia dotyczące powązek wykonam koło maja może troche później. Wynika to z faktu że nie mam teraz odpowiedniego aparatu. Jesli w miedzyczasie coś będziesz miał dla mnie (obojętnie wojskowe czy stare) wpisz na mojej liście a chętnie sie tym zajmę jak tylko dostanę aparat.16:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

A Ty z Warszawy jesteś? pytanie z Ciekawości.

Hej! Po pogrzebie profesora Bartoszewskiego biorę sie za fotografowanie starych powązek. Jeśli możesz powstawiaj do artykułów te foty co zrobiłem dziś. Lukasz2 (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Dziś zrobiłem jeszcze kilkanaście fotografii z powązek wojskowych. Jak będziesz mógł to wstaw je do odpowiednich artykułów. Lukasz2 (talk) 13:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC) W kolejnych dniach jade na stare ale muszę zrobić sobie listę.Lukasz2 (talk) 13:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tak na marginesie to pozwolę sobie opisać Ciebie na mojej stronie użytkownika jako "Hokeista" - za arttykuły o zawodnikach tej dyscypliny sportu.Lukasz2 (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Udało się zrealizować kilka fotek z zamówienia. nagrobek Napieralskiego pomógł.Lukasz2 (talk) 11:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Cześć! Ponownie udałem się na Powązki I zrobiłem kilkanaście kolejnych fotek, jeśli mozesz to wstaw je do poszczególnych artykułów.Lukasz2 (talk) 16:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sanatorium Sejmikowe im. Stanisława Okulicza w Otwocku

Hej. Niestety nie mogę pomóc, byłem tam przejazdem. Pozdrawiam, pjahr @ 08:59, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:KH Sanok logo.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:KH Sanok logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KH Sanok logo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NAC

Dzień dobry! Chciałem zapytać, czy zna Pan jakiś sposób na "przechwytywanie" zdjęć ze stron NAC. Chodzi mi np. o tę fotografię: http://www.audiovis.nac.gov.pl/obraz/218037/c97151af9b0e31e51d3cb2edb0cc5371/ Potrafię tylko "uzyskać" taki efekt: http://img.audiovis.nac.gov.pl/SM0/SM0_22-322.jpg Dziękuję z góry (i przepraszam za dziwne pytanie). Ukłony! --Pqrs (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No tak, zrzut ekranu, nie pomyślałem... Dziękuję raz jeszcze.--Pqrs (talk) 19:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC) PS Sanok, ładne miasto[reply]

Prof. Zembala

Cześć Zrobiłem dziś fotografię ministrowi zdrowia więc jeśli możesz wstaw do artykułu. Lukasz2 (talk) 15:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zaleski

Jak tylko się tam pojawię, to spróbuję zrobić. A gdzie On dokładnie leży? Pzdr. MOs810 (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taki bardzo rozległy to nie jest, ale nagromadzenie nagrobków spore. Pzdr. MOs810 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wojskowe Powązki

Cześć! Tutaj są nowe fotki, część z nich ma już pomniki byłem tam dziś z okazji powstania.POzdrawiamLukasz2 (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aleja Gwiazd Władysławowo

Cześć! Właśnie wróciłem z Wakacji i jednym z łupów są gwiazdy z Alei Gwiazd Sportu jeśli możesz powpinaj je do odpowiednich artykułów.Lukasz2 (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Artur Goldhammer

Hi Lowdown,

I would like to exchange email addresses with you. You have written a lot about my great grandfather (Goldhammer) and I'm keen to learn more.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Motherfuzz (talk • contribs) 18:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nieuprawnione publikacje zdjęć z commons 2

Nie mogę ci nic podpowiedzieć, nie jestem prawnikiem. Z doświadczenia wiem, że w dwóch przypadkach po prostu zwróciłem uwagę na to że trzeba zastosować podaną licencję (ktoś wziął moje zdjęcie z commons) i podziałało. Jakby nie podziałało, to nie wiem co należałoby zrobić. Masur (talk) 16:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Logo of 150 Years Anniversary of Autosan factory in Sanok (1982).JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of 150 Years Anniversary of Autosan factory in Sanok (1982).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomb of Drwięga and Nagaj families at Central Cemetery in Sanok.jpg

File:Tomb of Drwięga and Nagaj families at Central Cemetery in Sanok.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cmkamensky (talk) 15:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adam Puzoń (1944-1945).JPG

File:Adam Puzoń (1944-1945).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dd1495 (talk) 08:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antoni Porębski & Stefan Wyszyński (Komańcza, 1956)a.JPG

File:Antoni Porębski & Stefan Wyszyński (Komańcza, 1956)a.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dd1495 (talk) 08:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antoni Porębski & Stefan Wyszyński (Komańcza, 1956)b.JPG

File:Antoni Porębski & Stefan Wyszyński (Komańcza, 1956)b.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dd1495 (talk) 08:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tarnów - Czyżewicz

Cześć, wszystkie zdjęcia ze Starego Cmentarza wrzuciłem już na Commons. Być może będę w styczniu w Tarnowie, postaram się w miarę możliwości sfotografować ten nagrobek i udostępnić zdjęcie tutaj. Andrzej Otrębski (talk) 10:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć, z niejakim opóźnieniem ;) ale udało mi się sfotografować grobowiec Czyżewiczów, zdjęcia są w Category:Old Cemetery in Tarnów pod nazwami Tarnow Stary Cmentarz 25 do 34. Mam nadzieję, że przydadzą się do wykorzystania. Andrzej Otrębski (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:IIHF banner, Belarus U20 - Denmark U20, 18.12.2013 in Sanok 2.jpg

File:IIHF banner, Belarus U20 - Denmark U20, 18.12.2013 in Sanok 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:22, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jerzy Grodyński (SF).jpg

Thank you for your comment. The image of Jerzy (my grandfather's cousin) I have uploaded appears to be better quality (if you look at Jerzy's jacket you can see the check of the material) but should you prefer that the original image be the default view please revert. Kind regards. --SM1 (talk) 13:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcie Dębu Pamięci

Witaj Wykorzystam Twoje zdjęcie pewnego Dębu :). A przy okazji zapytam. Czy dr praw przedwojenny daje mocną przesłankę do ency? Gruzin (talk) 17:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konrad von Parzham (drawing).jpg

Hi Lowdown, for this image you are using {{PD-Polish}} which covers photographs only. This photograph, however, is a derived work of a painting and you did add nothing regarding the copyright status of the depicted artwork. Please fix this. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Srogów Górny board.jpg

File:Srogów Górny board.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stok (talk) 07:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Zdjęcia

Hej! Przede wszystkim bardzo przepraszam za opóźnienie, ale zrobiłem sobie ostatnio dwa tygodnie wakacji - w sensie tradycyjnego urlopu w prawdziwym życiu, ale też równocześnie przerwy od edytowania. Moim zdaniem mają tu zastosowanie ogólne zasady przechodzenia utworów stworzonych w Polsce do domeny publicznej. Czyli w skrócie: jeśli znany jest autor, to dzieło przechodzi do PD od początku kolejnego roku po 70. rocznicy śmierci autora. Jeśli autor jest nieznany, 70 lat od pierwszej publikacji, za którą w tym przypadku pewnie można uznać wydanie świadectwa. Taka jest moja interpretacja, ale oczywiście nie ma gwarancji, że ktoś w społeczności Commons nie będzie miał innej, to jest wątpliwy "urok" tego projektu. Pozdrawiam! Powerek38 (talk) 14:48, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Józef Poznański (1928, Santiago de Chile).jpg

File:Józef Poznański (1928, Santiago de Chile).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiesław Wolwowicz

Dość specyficzna sytuacja, de facto jest pochowany w 2 miejscach, nie zwróciłem na to uwagi początkowo. --Lukasz2 (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC) Popatrzyłem w zbiorach i jak będę miał czas to go uzupełnię. Z pracy mam 2 minuty to się pójdzie i zrobi fotkę --Lukasz2 (talk) 21:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiesz sprawą bardziej palącą był dziś odcinek 1 z 10. Jeśli tylko będzie widno to przejdę się i zrobię fotkę jak nie to zaczekam do marca. Może będzie wiecej roboty jak tylko 40 grobów. --Lukasz2 (talk) 20:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adam Sapieha (1828-1903).jpg

File:Adam Sapieha (1828-1903).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gower (talk) 19:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adam Didur

Hej! Ja nie stworzyłem żadnej z tych kategorii. Po prostu sprzątając obszar polskich aktorów i wokalistów odkryłem przypadkiem, że są dwie kategorie o tej samej osobie, więc przeniosłem grafiki do tej kategorii, w której zastałem ich więcej, a następnie zrobiłem przekierowanie. Nie mam zdania merytorycznego, który zapis jest prawidłowy. Gdybyś chciał to zmieniać - nie mam nic przeciwko. Mnie zależało tylko na skupieniu wszystkich związanych z nim zasobów Commons w jednym miejscu. Pozdrawiam! Powerek38 (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Józef Sosnowski (-1906).jpg

@Lowdown: since you were the uploader, do you know who this is? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lychakiv_Cemetery_–_K

Lychakiv Cemetery – K has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Zuzanna Łozińska (Carewicz).jpg

Copyright status: File:Zuzanna Łozińska (Carewicz).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zuzanna Łozińska (Carewicz).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Budynek gimnazjalny przy ul. Andrzeja Potockiego 22 w Stryju (-1931).jpg

Copyright status: File:Budynek gimnazjalny przy ul. Andrzeja Potockiego 22 w Stryju (-1931).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Budynek gimnazjalny przy ul. Andrzeja Potockiego 22 w Stryju (-1931).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Plaque to Zofia Strzałkowska (Lwów 1924).jpg

Copyright status: File:Plaque to Zofia Strzałkowska (Lwów 1924).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Plaque to Zofia Strzałkowska (Lwów 1924).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:Zofia Strzałkowska (at a table).jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klara Solonenko.jpg

File:Klara Solonenko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maurycy Turkowski 2.jpg

File:Maurycy Turkowski 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zmiana nazw tradycyjnych polskich pułków ułańskich z okresu II RP

Witaj kategoryzuję od miesięcy kategorie dotyczące II RP, biografie itd. User z UKR Микола Василечко bez jakiejkolwiek dyskusji lub próby podjęcia dyskusji z innymi użytkownikami zlikwidował w projekcie multilingualnym commons tradycyjne nazwy polskie i wprowadził hybrydy angielsko-austrowęgierskie (uhlan z niemieckiego to po angielsku lancer} Category:1st Krechowce Uhlan Regiment, Category:2nd Grochow Uhlan Regiment, Category:3rd Silesian Uhlan Regiment, Category:5th Zaslaw Uhlan Regiment, Category:7th Lublin Uhlan Regiment, Category:8th Uhlan Regiment of Duke Jozef Poniatowski, Category:9th Lesser Poland Uhlan Regiment, Category:10th Lithuanian Uhlan Regiment, Category:11th Legions Uhlan Regiment, Category:12th Podolian Uhlan Regiment, Category:14th Jazlowiec Uhlan Regiment, Category:19th Volhynian Uhlan Regiment, Category:23rd Grodno Uhlan Regiment, Category:24th Uhlan Regiment, Category:25th Greater Poland Uhlan Regiment, Category:26th Greater Poland Uhlan Regiment po prostu zadecydował że tak będzie i już. Pułki te były pułkami polskimi i nie należały do żadnych formacji międzynarodowych czy wielokulturowych bądź wieloetnicznych. Jako kontrprzykład uszanowania tradycji narodowych, kultury i dowodu na projekt multilingualny podaję kategorię Category:Cavalry regiments of the Army of the German Empire gdzie nazewnictwo tradycyjnych pułków jest po niemiecku ... i logicznie nikomu nie przeszkadza. Zgłosiłem sprawę do administracji projektu i gdyby doszło do dyskusji na ten temat to proszę o wzięcie udziału w takowej. Dzięki z góry i pozdrawiam. 77.6.172.89 05:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Władysław Bandurski (DB).jpg

Copyright status: File:Władysław Bandurski (DB).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Władysław Bandurski (DB).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Adam Piasecki Lwów.JPG

Dobry wieczór. Ja w sprawie powyższej grafiki załadowanej w 2016 roku. To raczej nie ta sama osoba [7] ? Dzięki z góry za odpowiedź. pozdr. 77.6.44.247 18:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

cmentarz w Białej

Cześć. Publikowałeś już zdjęcia ze starego cmentarza w Bielsku-Białej. Może uda Ci się rzy okazji tam znaleźć nagrobek inż. Władysława Adamczyka z Sanoka - byłoby super. I dzięki za ostatnie zdjęcia Kocyłowskiego oraz Matzenauera (w tym drugi przypadku jest tam też Franciszek Peterek). Lowdown (talk) 21:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

niczego nie obiecuję, codziennie tamtędy przechodzą i widzę, że najstarsze groby są bezwzględnie usuwane z powodu zaległości opłaty na użytkowane miejsce, będę miał w pamięci 14:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

ps. czy w biografii WA pojawia się nazwisko Sobel? 17:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

grób w ewidencji cm. znajdował się pod nr P II/A/ 19, obecnie pod tym nr znajduje się grobowiec Soblów, zdjęcie w pliku z dziś.

całkiem możliwe, datę zgonu podali telefonicznie dokładnie, ostatni pochówek w tym miejscu też, zwyczajowo w metryce znajdzie się miejsce na współmałżonka, i przyczynę zgonu ets. , po ponad 100 lata łóżeczko zajął ktoś inny w tym miejscu, ale ślad w papierach pozostał [...] m.

[8] pierwotna kwatera P II/A/ 19 należała do Adamczyka [...]

re Baszak

witaj, kojarzę osobę z widzenia i lokalnych wydarzeń charytatywnych ale zdjęcia nie posiadam :( S. 2021-04-26

File tagging File:Obituary of Adam Miler in Sano (2019).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Obituary of Adam Miler in Sano (2019).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Obituary of Adam Miler in Sano (2019).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ruthven (msg) 20:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pilgrim House in Kalwaria Pacławska (2021)b.jpg

File:Pilgrim House in Kalwaria Pacławska (2021)b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wanda Tiga (talk) 18:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ORP Bałtyk (-1932).jpg

File:ORP Bałtyk (-1932).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pibwl (talk) 17:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Stanisław Duda, Sanok (as civil).jpg

Copyright status: File:Stanisław Duda, Sanok (as civil).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stanisław Duda, Sanok (as civil).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Funeral of Władysław Łoziński (1913).jpg

Copyright status: File:Funeral of Władysław Łoziński (1913).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Funeral of Władysław Łoziński (1913).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category => "Rodzina Wojskowa"

Cześć. Zwracam uwagę, że istnieje już kategoria "Stowarzyszenie „Rodzina Wojskowa”" [9], tak więc kategoria "Rodzina Wojskowa"[10], którą utworzyłeś 8 czerwca, ją dubluje. W tej sytuacji moim zdaniem musimy przenieść pliki do jednej z kategorii, a pustą zgłosić do skasowania. Pozdrawiam.Dreamcatcher25 (talk) 06:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add template

Hi! Please add to categories (example: Category:Marian Jarosz (1921–2008)) template {{Wikidata Infobox}} for contact to Wikidata. --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rynek w Rzeszowie

W sumie, domyśliłem się, że w istnieniu dwóch odrębnych kategorii może być właśnie takie zamierzenie (znaczy - rynek jako plac między pierzejami i Rynek jako punkt adresowy z ewentualnym dodatkiem "ul."), ale dość dużo siedzę w commonsach i nigdzie poza Rzeszowem takiego rozróżnienia nie zauważyłem, więc uznałem, że i tu wyrównam do tego, co zwykle. Wyjątkowo jeszcze w Wikidanych zdarza mi się rozróżniać ulicę/plac od zespołu architektonicznego mającego swój odrębny wpis w ewidencji albo rejestrze zabytków, ale to nie jest ten przypadek. (W Rzeszowie np. budynki przy Towarnickiego wchodzą w skład zespołu budowlanego ulicy Jałowego). Panek (talk) 13:50, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Za twoje jakościowe zdjęcia Sanoka i okolic ! Wyslijp16 (talk) 09:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Tomczak

Dzien dobry. You took a photo of the graves of the Tomczak and Suchaniak families. I am editing the Polish wikipedia article and want to make it english. Do you know more about the other person Grazyna on the tombstone? A sister of his? I am wonder how to find out more, and who were the Suchaniaks. Dzieki za to Nyoome (talk) Nyoome (talk) 06:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tworki

Cześć. Ja teraz jestem częściej na Śląsku, bo w przysłowiowym międzyczasie przeprowadziłam się do Katowic, ale jeżdżę do Warszawy nadal dość regularnie w celach zawodowych. Niedługo będę mieć nawet okazję, żeby wyskoczyć na ten cmentarz. Pozdrawiam, Loraine (talk) 14:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Józef Jasiński ps. "Wyrwa"

Józef Jasiński ps. "Wyrwa" to, ten siedzący po stronie prawej? --Grzes1966 (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Żródło do foto [11]. --Grzes1966 (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Na fot. kolegą Józefa Jasińskiego jest starszy sierżant z KN i KWx2, siedzący po stronie lewej. Józef Jasiński miał tylko MN. Warte potwierdzenia. Pozdrawiam. --Grzes1966 (talk) 20:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KW? Raczej nie. Jak powiększysz foto. na maxa to, zobaczysz identyczny refleks świetlny na wstążkach orderowych u obu Podoficerów. U Józefa Jasińskiego, przed rozpoznanym przez Ciebie KW (zapewne z okuciem) są co najmniej dwa inne odznaczenia. --Grzes1966 (talk) 21:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wanted poster, Jacek Jaworek (2021).jpg

File:Wanted poster, Jacek Jaworek (2021).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:PiS parlamentary election 2023 in Sanok.jpg

File:PiS parlamentary election 2023 in Sanok.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rita Gorgon and Mieczysław Ettinger (trial 1933).JPG

File:Rita Gorgon and Mieczysław Ettinger (trial 1933).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ApproachTV (talk) 18:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mieczysław Batsch

Cześć Widzę że bywasz na cmentarzu Zasanie w Przemyślu. Jest tam pochowany Mieczysław Batsch. Jeśli byłbyś tam następnym razem postaraj się zrobić zdjęcie jego grobu. Cmentarz komunalny Zasanie w Przemyślu (kw. 21-13-3). Z góry dziękuję Lukasz2 (talk) 19:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Związek Sybiraków logo (1939).jpg

File:Związek Sybiraków logo (1939).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Altenmann (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Grave of Grzegorz Chanulak at Central Cemetery in Sanok (Matejki part). ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 15:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Szopena Street in Rzeszów (2022)d.jpg

File:Szopena Street in Rzeszów (2022)d.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

159.205.179.12 18:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Commemoration of Gruszka massacre (2024-07-05), Tarnawa p.jpg

File:Commemoration of Gruszka massacre (2024-07-05), Tarnawa p.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

159.205.179.12 17:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Commemoration of Gruszka massacre (2022-07-05)a.jpg

File:Commemoration of Gruszka massacre (2022-07-05)a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

159.205.179.12 18:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billboard odrobny.jpg

File:Billboard odrobny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billboard PBS Odrobny Kościuszki.jpg

File:Billboard PBS Odrobny Kościuszki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan Ziółkowski (priest officer) 4 among soldiers.JPG

File:Jan Ziółkowski (priest officer) 4 among soldiers.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Polimerek (talk) 09:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]