User talk:Bastique/archive4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archived discussions:
1234
5678910 edit

David Chaum

[edit]

Dr. Chaum authorized me in a PM to use the photo from his homepage. I ask you to put it back, where it belongs. Could you PSE discuss such issues before acting this hasty?

From: "David Chaum" <david@chaum.com>
To: "Psycho Chicken"
Subject: Re: RQ: photo for wikipedia
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:28:21 -0700
Sender: david@chaum.com
text of the email removed, as it does not seem to be of any importance.

TY. Now, PSE go to the homepage of Dr. Chaum and ask him, if you do not believe me. Psycho Chicken

Comment on the oppose vote

[edit]

I'd just like to comment on the oppose vote if that's okay. I suppose I can understand how you want me to have more edits to the Commons namespace. However, I could rack up an "impressive" number of edits by just going through every image listed on Commons:Deletion requests for a month or so and adding {{delete}}, but that doesn't really show anything. I hoped instead that my contributions to both Wikipedia and to the library here would have carried more weight. Also, just out of curiosity, I noticed when you were nominated for adminship on January 16 that you also only had two edits to the Commons: namespace. I'm not trying to be a douche bag or anything, but I'd just like you to possibly reconsider {{oppose}}ing me simply because of the fact that I only have two edits as well. At any rate, thanks for at least voting; I didn't expect so few. :) --tomf688 (talk - email) 19:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Comments at my RfA

[edit]

Je sais que je n'ai beaucoup de modifications au Commons. That's why I don't consider my RfA that much of a deal, I just want to help where it's needed. If you think it's useful and/or necessary for me to have more edits on Commons, where would you find my edits-to-be very useful? Thanks for your reply in advance. NielsF 06:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help with license Image:FrankGambale.jpg

[edit]

Could you please help with license/copright of that image? Somebody pointed out (in my discussion) that I should use {{PermissionOTRS}}. Whats next?

  1. Should I add the tag to the picture page?
  2. Should I delete the {no license...} tag?
  3. Contact a you (as described in Template:PermissionOTRS to confirm the permission?!

Thanks --Nil dib 07:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greek translations

[edit]

Hi there! I have added the greek translations in User:Pfctdayelise/Translations following your request at the greek Wikipedia. Let me know of any other translations in greek needed. Cheers. --Dada 16:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My bad

[edit]

Thanks for the information. Raul654 21:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DHL

[edit]

I took the photo from the english wikipedia so i think it is now free, isn't it? Thanx Guanxito 12:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok now I understand, I will delete it from the spanish wikipedia (where I used it) but i do not know how to delete it from wiki commons. Adios! bye bye Guanxito 13:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bastique, some time ago I marked Category:Turkish Food with a speedydelete-tag, because it was a double of Category:Turkish food. You've deleted both and created Category:Food of Turkey. This is another possible name for the category but it doesn't really fit to most if the other labels in Category:Food by country. I think it would help to navigate, if the names follow the same rule and I would prefer to rebuild Category:Turkish food. What do you think? --Lyzzy 07:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

[edit]

Hi. This edit is right? --Slade [pics] 03:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian translation

[edit]

Removing image, this image is a suspected copyright violation and will soon be deleted from the [[Commons:]].

Slika se uklanja. Za ovu sliku se sumnja da krši autorska prava te biće uskoro uklonjena sa Commons repoziture:

If you need anything else let me know Dado


Image:BuddhisticStatuesHK.jpg

[edit]

Hey Bastique, thanks a lot for your vote for my photo on the featured pictures candidates page. There is a new version of it now. The disturbing green wastebin got removed. As i didnt know if i can just replace the old photo with the new edited version I withdrew the original version and nominated the new version. Do u want to shift your vote to the new version? :) Regards --AngMoKio 20:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Egyptian Museum

[edit]

Hello. Why did you change the Category:Egyptian Museum to Category:Museums in Egypt. The Egyptian Museum is considered to have the best collection of antiquities from Ancient Egypt and we have many photos here that justify a separate category. There are also many museums in Egypt. --JLCA 11:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make this clear: The Egyptian Museum is ONE museum. Category:Museums in Egypt held and should hold pictures connected to this museum in my point of view. --Avatar 11:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Riverbanks ZOO

[edit]

Thanks for your help in IRC! --Edgester 17:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trance

[edit]

Hi Bastique. The link is http://di.fm. There's another similar station I like as well http://puredj.com. Have fun. :-) Arnomane 09:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lepidoptera

[edit]

Hi Bastique, thanks for uploading lepidoptera images. I have seen, that many of these images are redundant, so I have some hints for you. Please don't upload the entire compact flash card or whatever your cam uses. ;-) Select only the best image from each view. Try to capture the whole animal.

You created some new cats within Nymphalidae (as far as I have seen) - thats nice! There are some rules for linking and categorizing images within a taxonomic tree. If no article exists for the species, create one, and link the file name inside this article via gallery. Don't categorize the image itself. The article should only have one taxonomic cat (Nymphalinae and not Nymphalinae and Nymphalidae)! No rule without an exception: if you have an unidentified species you can categorize it with Unidentified Images of Butterflies and (if you know it) the familiy or subfamily cat. Last but not least: Please forgive me my terrible english! Best regards, --Olei 14:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore 21:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:99px-Castlebar crest.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --bjh21 15:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons-l subscription

[edit]

Hello Bastique/archive4,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 22:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for the support and the congratulations. I've already begun deleting a few bad images. Jkelly 16:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I support the decision and the image. It is unfortunate this had to happen as well as the reaction of some uncivilized users on following the procedure strictly. Lycaon 17:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonnes vacances

[edit]

-- AM 17:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: IRC

[edit]

That's just as well, perhaps it means I'm being more productive.

Or perhaps not...  :) pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Are you kidding? B'crat is even worse than admin! (Now I'm kidding. There is nothing worse than Commons admin.) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 16:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joke

[edit]

Wanna hear a joke? 216.164.203.90 17:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

Thx! TeunSpaans 17:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you say on Commons:Deletion requests that the conclusion is delete, why don't you delete the file? --ALE! ¿…? 16:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

If put the {{PD-Deutsche Bundespost stamps}} on the description page, then you should also upload the German stamp (http://www.seemotive.de/picjpg2/pr1.jpg ) and not the Falkland stamp. --ALE! ¿…? 16:12, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop shouting! (Another reason to vote in contra.) You should read the discussion and think an instant before you do something. I was talking about a German stamp being a good replacement for the photo. Not a Falkland Stamp. Besides you did not correct the description page of the image. And no, you are not helping me to close the discussion if you produce double work cross checking yours. --ALE! ¿…? 22:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Before this is becoming a political issue, I have changed my vote to "abstention" --ALE! ¿…? 11:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archives had been reverted

[edit]

It turns out I worked for nothing. The page is collosal in size again. --Cool CatTalk|@ 23:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre Jery Sandoval IV

[edit]

Hola Bastique.

Quiero decirte que las fotos de Jery Sandoval no tienen problema alguno en cuanto a Copyrights pues ésta fue tomada por un amigo internauta mejicano en una fiesta a la cual Jery Sandoval fue; mi amigo me pidió que la subiese ya que no se la pasa mucho en el computador a diferencia mia.

Además recientemente fui atorizado a través de un e-mail por Televisa (la propietaria de todo lo relacionado con Jery Sandoval)para usar las fotos de ella exclusivamente en Wikipedia.

Gracias por tu atención y espero que no me vuelvan a borrar las fotos de ella. Todos sus fans estaríamos muy tristes.

--S.V.B.E.E.V. 21:11, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation:
I just wanted to tell you that [[Jery Sandoval] pictures have no problem regarding copyright, since they were taken by a mexican friend from internet on a party where Jery Sandoval assisted. My friend asked me to upload it since he doesn't spend much time at the PC, unlike me.
Besides I was recenly authorized by Televisa via email (who owns the material related to Jery Sandoval) to use pictures of her "exclusively" at Wikipedia:
Thanks fot your attention and I hope the pictures dont' get redeleted. All the fans would be very sad.
Well, while it would be nice to show us the email proof, the fact is that we cannot use "for wikipedia only pictures" at commons. Therefore they were deleted. Sicne as you pointed , televisa owns the copyright, televisa would have to show us proof of the release under a free license (not just "for wikipedia only")
Bueno, mientras sería bueno que nos muestres la prueba, el hecho es que no podemos usar fotos "con permiso exclusivo para wikipedia" en commons. Por lo tanto, tienen que ser borradas. Dado uqe, como señalas, televisa es la que posee lo derechos de tales materiales, necesitaríamos prueba de que televisa liberó las imagenes bajo una licencia libre. No basta con que sea "sólo para wikipedia". Drini 21:32, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eragon18

[edit]

I noticed at User talk:Eragon18 that you've deleted one image uploaded by Eragon18. I've tagged two more with nld, but they are probably copyvios too; if you happen to know anything about this, could you take a look at them? Cnyborg 21:27, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maradona

[edit]

Vi que has colocado un cartel de borrado de la imagen, cuando he pedido a Donna Hilton en forma expresa la licencia GNU y me he molestado en aclararlo en el sumario citando el mensaje de quien es propietaria de la imagen ("I give you a GNU Free Documentation Licence for the following photographs: static.flickr.com/63/155697786_0125559b4e.jpg and static.flickr.com/45/155697790_e11ba0fdd8.jpg"). Le solicito que por favor quite el cartel, y si tiene algun tipo de duda sobre la veracidad de la licencia puede preguntárselo a la dueña aquí. Muchas gracias. --Sking 01:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bureaucrat

[edit]

Does the country of origin make a difference? I think the language is more important. Maybe ask User:Anna? Some more Germans? pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why does timezone matter? Bureaucrats don't do anything so urgent. If you want Chinese speakers, try perhaps User:Fanghong or User:Shizhao (he is a steward I believe). pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, Bastique, I wrote a peculiar comment on your b'crat nomination (which, I realized after reading, didn't make any sense), but in fact it would be just as well to nominate a dozin more b'crats, like they have done on Spanish Wikipedia. / Fred Chess 21:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: IRC

[edit]

IRC

[edit]

Just wondering... do you ever get on IRC? We could use a Russian expert at #wikimedia-commons every once in a while, notably with the Template:PD-Soviet debate going on... Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 17:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. I didn't play with IRC. Main point - it's yet another distraction (I have much of them, be:Special:Recentchanges is main for my Wikipedia time). I'm definitely not a en:Julius Ceaser :-(
I could install software, but don't sure that I'll have too much time to be available.
As for expert - it's very loud word for my law knowledge :-) I think User:Lupo know subject much better then me. I agree with arguments of Template talk:PD-Soviet#Retroactivity redux (I read original Russian Supreme Court ruling), so only images with {{PD-Russia}} could be left on Commons. Main problem - to find out authors and date of their death.
EugeneZelenko 14:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin news

[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request closer

[edit]

Refresh your monobook and try it out on COM:DEL. Alphax (talk) 00:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

hi, i'm not sure i understand your request here; i contacted marshal hedin for the pictures, and he granted me permission to publish all his species pictures on the commons. as a matter of fact, there should be dozens of pictures with the same license. what did i do wrong, or miss? thx --Sarefo 19:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've finally finished uploading duplicates of the remaining 70 of his images; I've left the originals alone (for now).--Nilfanion 20:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted all but one of the images: Image:Palestine occupation32.jpg (as its on COM:DEL looking like a delete).--Nilfanion 16:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bot flag request

[edit]

Hallo,
I inserted a request for bot-flag for my PortalBot, but it seems, that nothing happens. Do you know about a problem ? Is the request Ok there ? I'm owner of a (same-named) bot-account on de:WP since nearly a year, therefore I don't think, that there shoud be a problem. Augiasstallputzer 20:32, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adminship

[edit]

Thanks for your support, Cary. I appreciate it. --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

See discussion here cheers --Sarefo 22:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confused over Image:Laracroft.JPG

[edit]

Hi Bastique, you got me confused here. A week ago another admin decided to keep the image and you've added a deletion nomination for it today. Could you please add your objections to the deletion page and/or contact Shizao on this matter? Cheers, Siebrand 22:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It could be simply stated as follows: When I saw the image the first time, I thought it was a woman dressed up as Lara Croft. That could be simply excused as a "woman in a costume". Having seen the image Image:Laracroft-neu.jpg, I realized this was a mannequin, clearly designed to be the character Lara Croft, which is very heavily copyrighted. It's a minor distinction, but one that changed my decision nevertheless. Bastique
Ah, yes, I had the same reservations and I also think the images should be deleted. Thanks for clearing this up. Siebrand 06:00, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, is it a mannequin? That changes my opinion too. No-one said this. / Fred Chess 08:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:EU flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

jed 17:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat

[edit]

To be precise, I am a admin at seven Wiki sites, including being a bureaucrat at Chinese Wikisource only. Administering Chinese Wikisource is very easy with limited active users. Since you ask me, I will be willing to accept any nomination to run for a bureaucrat. Now, I would like to clear more files with copyright problems, especially the backlog of the deletion requests. If you like, I would like to receive further messages in French to practice my French reading.--Jusjih 10:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Français n'est pas ma premiere langue! Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 14:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Even though French is not your primary language, your French is much better than mine.--Jusjih 03:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As I am male, saying "Vous etes nominée!" would be incorrect (m: nominé; f: nominée), but I am not laughing at you while your French is much better than mine. After this run for bureaucratship here, I will plan to run for adminship at English Wikipedia as well.--Jusjih 07:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seznam galaksij

[edit]

Something went wrong. Be more careful in the future. Thanks. --Eleassar my talk 00:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may use show changes before saving the page. --Eleassar my talk 12:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for undeleting this image. FYI, Erik Möller recently indicated that the policy regarding images that have been "superseded" by copies in other formats has changed: "'Obsolete' images should indeed no longer be deleted except where they're orphaned and there's clearly no opposition." In fact, when this GIF and several others were nominated for deletion, he closed listing with a "keep" result. —David Levy 18:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, can you help me and delete the PNGs in that category, where are no links on it ? All Images are superseded by SVGs. The deletion request is here. )

Just checked for links are:

  1. Image:Sinnbild_Mofa.png
  2. Image:Sinnbild_innerorts.png
  3. Image:Autohof.png
  4. Image:Sinnbild Pannenhilfe.png
  5. Image:Zeichen_1005-30.png
  6. Image:Zeichen_1005-31.png
  7. Image:Zeichen 1013-50.png
  8. Image:Zeichen 1013-51.png
  9. Most of the warning signs.
  10. Much more...

Augiasstallputzer 21:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UN Flag

[edit]

Nope - it probably can be used in commertial way. Also Logos are belong for their owners and are copyrighted as trademarks. Such causes the Wikipedias are free, but their logos not. MonteChristof 14:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THis flag is not national flag. It's a symbol of political organisation. MonteChristof 17:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not arguing. I would like to leave it on servers but I'm not sure if it's 100% legal. Request have been done. MonteChristof 17:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bastique, you wrote: "Commercial use of UN flag is impossible. Flag is internationally recognised." Please specify that. Wikipedia is "commercial". And a commercial use of the flag is prohibited by the United Nations. So why do you consider it legal to use it on Wikipedia? Henning Blatt 21:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to explain it to him on deWP but he does not understand. --Steschke 21:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He is on the way. --Steschke 06:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thailand Coup 2006 announce.jpg

[edit]

According to Copyright law of Thailand, law, governmental reports and announcements are not copyrightable. -- Lerdsuwa 02:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These are full text from relevant section of COPYRIGHT ACT B.E. 2537 (1994)
Section 7. The followings are not deemed copyright work by virtue of this Act : (1)news of the day and facts having the character of mere information which is not a work in literary, scientific or artistic domain, (2)constitution and legislations, (3)regulations, by-laws, notifications, orders, explanations and official correspondence of the Ministries, Departments or any other government or local units, (4)judicial decisions, orders, decisions and official reports, (5)translation and collection of those in (1) to (4) made by the Ministries, Departments or any other government or local units. -- Lerdsuwa 02:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
By the way only the constitution of 1997 is revoked. This copyright law still stands.
Thank you very much. -- Lerdsuwa 03:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin news

[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks. Sorry, my english is not good. I can read but I can't write good english. I hope to improve my English next months. Now, I can not talk on line. I hope my contribution as bureaucrat be useful for Commons users. Greetings --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 22:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 15:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat and IRC

[edit]

I have noticed my new privileges as a new bureaucrat, but unfortunately I have no IRC connectivity.--Jusjih 03:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English: I'm sure that the image is a copyvio. The statue is in a museum, a museum outdoors, it is not a street. In this link (you can accede to that link from here) of the site of the museum you can ask for the permission to make photographic reproductions. The commercial use without paying by the author rights is not allowed
Español: Estoy convencido de que la imagen es una violación de los derechos de autor. La estatua está en un museo, un museo al aire libre, no es una calle. En este enlace (a ese enlace se accede desde aquí) de la página web del museo, puedes solicitar el permiso para hacer reproduciones fotográficas. No se permite el uso comercial sin pagar por los derechos de autor

If you agree and you wish it, I can delete the image--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 21:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English: Images of sculptures in public places can be photographed and be published. The sculpture is in Paseo de la Castellana, a street of Madrid. The law that indicates it is here (article 35,2). Greetings
Español: Las imágenes de esculturas en lugares públicos pueden ser fotografiadas y ser publicadas. La escultura está en 'Paseo de la Castellana, una calle de Madrid. La ley que lo indica está aquí (apartado 35.2). Saludos

--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 22:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English: Sorry, I have been studying the image. The exposed data are true, but I cannot give a definitive answer and I am not able to relate in English the complication that the subject has. I can't say what I want in english, although I will try it.
Images of sculptures in public places can be photographed and be published in Spain (spanish law, article 35,2), but it's a museum outdoors: I do not know if the place of the statue is public or private, I do not know if the place belongs to the municipality of Madrid or to the museum.
In addition, in this link of the site of the museum you can ask for the permission to make photographic reproductions of the museum (the commercial use, without paying, is not allowed).
Nevertheless, seeing this image of the statue I think that the statue is in the street, but the museum locates it in its interior (number 12 of the map of this link)
Since I am not able to decide, tomorrow I am going to consult this image with people of Madrid. Perhaps they can clarify where the statue is located.
Español: Lo siento, he estado estudiando la imagen. Los datos expuestos hasta ahora son verdad, pero no puedo dar una respuesta definitiva y no puedo expresar en inglés la complicación que el tema tiene. No soy capaz de decir lo que deseo en inglés, aunque lo intentaré.
Las imágenes de esculturas en lugares públicos se pueden fotografiar y publicar en España (véase la ley, artículo 35.2), pero es un museo al aire libre: no sé si el lugar de la estatua es público o privado, yo no sé si el lugar pertenece al municipio de Madrid o al museo.
Además, en este enlace del sitio del museo se puede pedir permiso para hacer reproducciones fotográficas del museo (el uso comercial, sin pagar, no se permite).
Sin embargo, viendo esta imagen de la estatua pienso que la estatua está en la calle, pero el museo la localiza en su interior (número 12 del mapa de este enlace)
Puesto que no puedo decidir, voy mañana a consultar esta imagen con gente de Madrid. Quizás puedan clarificar donde se localiza la estatua.
Un cordial saludo --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 01:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • español: He recibido la respuesta de User:Anna sobre esta imagen. Piensa que es copyvio, pero ha decidido consultárselo a otro administrador (User:Dodo). Realmente debe de ser una imagen difícil de catalogar.

ingles:I have received the answer of User:Anna about this image. She thinks that it is copyvio, but she has decided to consult it to another administrator (User:Dodo). Really it's a difficult image.--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 00:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Random

[edit]

Hi, I finished eventually. My 100 is viewable here, I did a bit of basis analysis on the stats too...--Nilfanion 00:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete picture

[edit]

Hi, I'm Avi Kedmi, the author of the Maccabi's Pics. I've labeled the Seven Pics My Friend told you about, and I want to ask for their removal.

--Avi kedmi 17:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

80.58.205.37

[edit]

80.58.205.37 is just a IP from a cybercafé, but I am gl:User:Sobreira. Best regards

Bosnian COA

[edit]

Hey, I see that you are an admin so I am reqyesting that you delete two images:

This is because I created the .svg file: Image:Coat of Arms of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992-1998).svg

Thank you, Kseferovic 00:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There, I completed what you asked. My only question is does this have to be talked over or can any admin delete any image? Since there are for several Bosnian flags that have not been deleted after better versions have been uploaded. Thanks, Kseferovic 00:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons deletion

[edit]

Hello. I see you re an admin here (just like user above) and must ask you to delete these files:

I made a mistake in naming the files (i put image instead of media).

Best regards and thanks West Brom 4ever

CheckUser

[edit]

Hi Bastique,

Per the CheckUser Policy, I have been granted the checkuser permission. Thankyou for supporting this request. Requests for checkuser can be made at the Administrators' noticeboard. Thanks, Alphax (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 22:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Your Picture

[edit]

So, I've just searched a bit arround. And I think it should be one of the following species:

  • Scarlet Skimmer (Crocothemis servilia)
  • Pin-tailed Pondhawk (Erythemis plebeja)
  • Roseate Skimmer (Orthemis ferruginea)

But I will look for mor details tomorrow. Just remind me in the irc ;-) good night --Morray 22:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]