User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/jusqu'en Mai2017

2017

Ne me dis pas que tu es surpris ! Mes tarifs n'ont pas augmenté depuis juillet dernier...

Bonne année, vieil ami !

--Jebulon (talk) 16:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Je te remercie bien vivement. J'ai quelque chose pour toi je t’appelle ce soir... Bonne Année --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhagastis albomarginatus albomarginatus mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Polo (Venice) - St Vincent Ferreri preaches to the crowd by Giandomenico Tiepolo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Choir of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) – Tomb of the Doge Michele Morosini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhagastis albomarginatus albomarginatus mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 19:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Inside Facade and organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 19:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allegoria delle virtù mocenigo by Jacopo Guarana Gallerie dell'Accademia (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 19:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

liens wiki

bonjours, les liens des galeries vers les wiki de chaque langue se trouve dans la colonne de gauche et est accessible par tout le monde, si tu veux les changer, les liens sont gérés par wikidata

Manifestement tu n'es pas habitué à nos règles. Les discussions doivent se placer "à la suite" vers le bas donc et surtout il faut signer. Les discussions qui implique d'autre intervenant se font en anglais et sur la page ou la discussion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhagastis albomarginatus everetti mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Joalpe (talk) 23:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Santa Teresa crowned by the Savior by Gregorio Lazzarini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Here-lived plaques in Venice - Jacopo Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Quite obviously the best of the 3 photos in this Commons category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhagastis albomarginatus everetti mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Choir. The main altar..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glory of Saint Cajetan by Mattia Bortoloni Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra nessus mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 20:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Choir. Libyan Sibyl, by Giuseppe Torretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 20:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Geremia in Venice - Organ Doors by Palma il Giovane - Annunciation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please check the link to the category --Llez (talk) 18:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Done First day, first error ... The year looks good. Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 20:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra nessus mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:56, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Choir. The Glory of the Angels, ceiling of choir by Giuseppe and Domenico Valeriani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Soranzo Van Axel (Venice) - facade on Rio de Ca'Widmann.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 18:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued image not used

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, you've put the text "it would be useful that this image is used" below my last nomination for valued pictures. I'm not sure what exactly you refer to. Is there anything I can do about or what I could correct? Best regards, --Basotxerri (talk) 15:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

• @Basotxerri: It would be useful for images to be used at least in an article in a project. If they are images of values it is necessary what they serve. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes, I've thought that you could refer to that. However according to the requirements it's not necessary that the image is in use but they must have a value for a potential use. So what do you think we could do (or what could I do)? Best regards, --Basotxerri (talk) 22:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
• Hi Basotxerri . No, it is not a rule neither a requirement to use an image nominated in VIC, but I think it is better, and more in the "spirit" of Commons and of the VI project. As for me, It is my own mandatory for myself: each of my nomination is "used in" Just try it !.--Jebulon (talk) 00:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
  • This is highly recommended. The goal is that the labeled images can be widely displayed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Hi Jebulon, hi Archaeodontosaurus, OK, in general terms you're right and I must admit that a general interest in the pending nomination for the "Football field Campo de los Palacios" and perhaps the two "Olarizu Meadows" pics is quite low but some are quite useful, e. g. the also pending "Archivo del Territorio Histórico de Álava". Anyway, I'll try to follow your recomendations. Thank you for answering! --Basotxerri (talk) 14:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra gnoma moutned specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice). The Apotheosis of St. Theresa by Giambattista Tiepolo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Geremia (Venice) - Turret clocks dating from 1500.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra gnoma mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell gable of Chapel of Saint John Beaumont-de-Lomagne Tarn-et-Garonne, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Miraculous communion du Saint Teresa of Jesus by Niccolò Bambini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra incarnata mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 11:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. St. Joseph appears in Santa Teresa and free from a dangerous encounter by Niccolò Bambini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio del Gheto (Venice), seen from ponte del Gheto Vecchio to SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 20:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Venier

Salut,

Tu n'aurais pas interverti les Venier ? Ton Sebastiano a tout l'air d'un ecclésiastique, et pas l'air du doge du même nom. L'autre buste pourrait être le doge. À moins qu'il y ait eu plusieurs Sebastiano Venier...

Dis-moi.

Amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 22:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

• Toujours prompt à déceler le détail qui cloche! Dans ce cas c'est normal. Dans les grandes familles les prénom sont récurrents. Il s'agit bien d'un Sebastiano Venier ecclésiastique. J'avais signalé cette particularité dans l'article de la Madonna dell'Orto. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

• • Alors je me suis permis une petite précision encyclopédique dans la légende sur la page de l'image... Comme j'aime beaucoup ton travail, je m'y intéresse de près ! Je ne te remercierai jamais assez de m'avoir fait découvrir le monde collaboratif extraordinaire de "Commons", et tout ce que j'ai appris grâce à toi !--Jebulon (talk) 10:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

• • • Trouvé ! ici. J'adore ça !--Jebulon (talk) 10:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
      • Je te félicite surtout d'en avoir trouver un... 3e. Le doge: pas de problème il est très connu. Ta trouvaille concerne un évêque de Vincence (qui est bien de la même famille) mais qui est trop "jeune". Celui des Scalzi (de la photo) abbé et protonotaire apostolique est mort en 1662 et son buste est de Falconi qui est mort en 1697. La famille s'enrichi et l'affaire se corse. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
        • Allons bon ! --Jebulon (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
          • Ah ben oui. J'ai mis un lien dans l'article anglais de l'église sur le doge.--Jebulon (talk) 09:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra incarnata mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 10:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Choir. Persian Sibyl, by Giuseppe Torretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 10:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Glory of St. Dominic by Giambattista Tiepolo Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 10:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra polistratus mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 14:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auguste Seysses « Le soir de la vie », Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope. It looks like the bottom of the sculpture is inclined upwards from right to left, so you could consider straightening it before you nominate the photo at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
• Thank you. You can see on Auguste Seysses - La fontaine le soir de la vie Toulouse 1907.jpg the statue is "tilted" horizontally, but it is wanted by the sculptor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

• You're welcome, and thanks for taking the photo and nominating it. Note that the sculptor wanted the slant if/when you nominate the picture at QIC. It's a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Cappella Venier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Apparently the only photo on Commons that shows the whole chapel. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra polistratus mounted specimen ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior - Cappella Venier - Saint Sebastian by Bernardo Falconi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Landscape with travelers by Marco Ricci - Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra queenslandi mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior Bust of Sebastiano Venier by Bernardo Falconi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Geremia in Venice - Victory of St. Thomas Aquinas over temptation by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Shouldn't it be either St Thomas Aquinas or Tommaso d'Aquino? Charles (talk) 12:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

• You are right in English is Saint Thomas Aquinas. I corrected. Thank you --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Venice

http://theartnewspaper.com/news/conservation/exemplary-rialto-bridge-restoration-is-nearly-done-and-on-time/
http://theartnewspaper.com/news/conservation/st-mark-s-bares-all-for-a-few-months/ --Oursana (talk) 00:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra queenslandi mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior - Cappella Mora by Baldassare Longhena.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Institution of the Rosary by Giambattista Tiepolo Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful .--Pierre André (talk) 15:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanis bilineata bilineata mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Choir. Delphic Sibyl, by Giuseppe Torretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Geremia in Venice - The Expectation of the birth of the Virgin Mary by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Manduca boliviana et Category:Manduca boliviana

Salut Archaeodontosaurus, lorsque tu crées ces couples de pages galerie/catégorie, peux tu STP recopier les infos de l'espèce aussi dans la catégorie ? Par ailleurs, j'ai vu que tu utilisais le modèle "Taxonavigation", y a-t-il une différence avec le modèle "Lepidoptera" qui semble être plus souvent utilisé dans les catégories de lépidos ? Bonne journée--LamBoet (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Salut à toi. Pendant longtemps la catégorie et la gallerie avait des modèles incompatibles, ce n'est plus le cas aujourd'hui l'un et l'autre marche. Mais j'ai gardé les habitudes. Pour les catégories je ne suis pas persuadé de l'utilité de faire doublon avec les informations des galeries. Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Mettre les modèles de taxonavigation aussi dans la catégorie permet à celle-ci d'être naturellement classée dans les catégories "Species of Lepidoptera", "Species of Sphingidae", etc. qui recensent toutes les espèces déjà traitées. Par ailleurs, j'ai vu que cette page recommande de placer les informations relatives au taxon dans la catégorie plutôt que dans la galerie.--LamBoet (talk) 13:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Je ne savais pas cette particularité pour le papillons, çà ne me coûtera pas cher de la placer aussi dans la catégorie.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Merci à toi :-) --LamBoet (talk) 14:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanis bilineata bilineata mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 10:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior - Cappella Venier - Bust of Angelo Venier by Bernardo Falconi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Image looks tilted. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Good remark. The subject is the bust and especially the face; I placed myself in a way to be in front of his face which is the essential. Same remark for his brother (Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Cappella Venier - Bust of Sebastiano Venier.jpg. For a Museum I will remove the background. But in a church, as there is an architectural context, I do not do it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
  
•  Support I corrected image and looks better IMO. If you think otherwise you revert to your version. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:32, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I recognize that it is better. Thank you for your help. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio del Gheto (Venice), seen from Ponte de Gheto Novissimo from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanis bilineata bilineata mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior - Cappella Mora - John the Baptist by Melchior Barthel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 10:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna and Child with two Votaries by Paolo Veneziano Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 10:23, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanis pratti mounted specimen Male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior - Cappella Manin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
L'esaltazion della Croce by Giambattista Tiepolo Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 08:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

signature

Merci mon ami pour la promotion de mon Thomas Couture, car ce fut un travail très difficile, surtout quand on voit l'original. Mais pourrais-tu signer stp, pour la bonne forme. Merci ! --Jebulon (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

• Oops c'est fait --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanis pratti mounted specimen Male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Choir. Tiburtine Sibyl, by Giovanni Marchiori..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support ok for me Olivier LPB (talk) 06:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio Brazzo (Venice) - NE exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca clarki mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Chapel Manin. The Virgin and Child with St. Joseph in the clouds by Giuseppe Torretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venice receives the homage of Hercules and Ceres by Paolo Veronese Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:09, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca boliviana mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful Charles (talk) 07:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Romuald by Johann Karl Loth - Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Cappella Manin - Altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Pierre André (talk) 20:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca morelia mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful Charles (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior - Cappella Giovanelli - Altar by Ludovico David.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice) - The middle door :gothic portal by Giovanni Bon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Dinophasma DSC 0055.JPG

File:Dinophasma DSC 0055.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 23:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca morelia mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Choir. Sibyl of Samos, by Giovanni Marchiori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Homer by Mattia Preti - Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Strong opposition - Sorry, I prefer File:Mattia preti, omero, 1635 ca. 01.jpg, which looks more like a painting to me, whereas the nominated photo looks either unfinished or destroyed, and I mean it looks that way at full-page size, let alone full size. There's what we would call either terrible chromatic aberration or catastrophic paint loss in the painting as depicted in the nominated photo. I certainly hope the painting does look more like the other photo in real life, no offense, friend. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
• We must show the subjects as they are. With their true colors and with their flaws. We are not here to mount the subjects as we would like them to be. The image you prefer was made by amateurs who did not make the white balance: the colors are false. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - Since you're sure the painting really looks like this, I will remove my opposition, but I hope someone has a "before" picture, showing what the painting looked like whenever it was in good condition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- For the white balance is better here --Llez (talk) 19:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca wellingi mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior - Pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frari (Venice) - Coro dei Frati - Saint Louis of Toulouse by Pietro Lombardo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful --Llez (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca wellingi mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Cappella Manin - Michael archangel by Giuseppe Torretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 09:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio del Tentor (Venice) in Venice - eastern view from Ponte Storto..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Correction d'image

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus, j'utilise en ce moment ShiftN comme correction de perspective, mais je n'arrive pas à corriger cette image File:Église Saint-Austremoine - Issoire - Vie de Saint-Austremoine.jpg pourrais tu corriger ou me donner des conseils s'il te plait ?

Merci d'avance Olivier LPB (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

En fait si tu peux avoir un trépied et du recul, c'est l'idéal pour éviter les distorsions. Ton image n'était pas facile à corriger de façon automatique --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup ! En fait là on est dans le déambulatoire et comme je n'avais pas un assez grand angle c'est difficile de jouer sur le recul et l'angle sachant que le coté intérieur (séparation chœur/déambulatoire) du déambulatoire est fermé.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca boliviana mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior - Cappella Giovanelli - Statue of John of the Cross.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cahuzac (Tarn), France. Church Saint Vincent - Bell gable - S exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca andicola mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Cappella Manin - Gabriel archangel by Giuseppe Torretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venezia - Statue of St.Francis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca andicola mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 10:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Choir. Sibyl of the Hellespont, by Giovanni Marchiori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice) - Coro dei Frati - Crucifix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca prestoni mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Christ in Gethsemane by Giambattista Tiepolo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Is this a detail? Charles (talk) 18:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment No it is the work itself the chapel is very narrow. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio del Gheto (Venice), seen from Ponte de Gheto Novissimo toRio de San Girolamo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca prestoni mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Altar of Chapel Ruzzini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Apparently unique in scope on Commons and certainly useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte dei Ormesini (Venice) - South East exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All the other photos in this scope seem to have this bridge in shade, and this is the closest view, so most useful as a thumbnail in an article. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca clarki mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Ceilling by Ettore Tito.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Storto (Dorsoduro) on rio del Tentor, Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca diffissa tropicalis mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Alvise (Venice) interior - View of the nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Brazzo (Venice) - NE exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca diffissa tropicalis mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cahuzac (Tarn), France. War memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Only Commons photo in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Alvise (Venice) interior - The Barco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca sexta mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Alvise (Venice) interior - The Ceiling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa di San Polo (Venice) - Oratorio del Crocifisso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca sexta mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question What is the reason for the different colour of your specimens (grey) in comparison to other pictures (brown)? --Llez (talk) 18:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

• These are the real colors; These specimens were remarkably preserved away from light and high temperatures. Light and heat tend to "cook" all butterflies but is especially true for sphingids. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

 Support Thanks for the explanation --Llez (talk) 06:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa di San Polo (Venice) - Oratorio del Crocifisso - St. John of Nepomuk by Giandomenico Tiepolo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campo San Alvise (Venice) - NE exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 14:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca sexta mounted speciment female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 10:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand Canal in Venice - View from the Rialto to SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, a difficult decision in such a rich scope, but taking into account the informative annotations, I didn't see a better image, so best in scope and useful. DeFacto (talk). 07:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Alvise (Venice) interior - Organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte di San Girolamo (Venice) - SE exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 12:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Alvise (Venice) interior - Madonna of the Rosary by Giovanni Maria Morlaiter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx inouei mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte della Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - NE exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 07:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Alvise (Venice) interior - Altar of Saint Louis of Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pieris brassicae (caterpillar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca sexta mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Charles (talk) 11:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Tiven2240 (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx inouei mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful Charles (talk) 20:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pieris brassicae (Large white) - caterpillar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Seems like the best picture in scope, but it has more vivid colors than other pictures of this caterpillar on Commons. Are there different subspecies or simply different phenotypes that have somewhat different colors? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Cabbage (and caterpillar) were found on the market. I bought both and I went to do the photography in my studio, which explains the perfect colors. The most interesting is the color matching between the caterpillar and the cabbage. At the end I ate only the cabbage... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Thanks for the explanation and story. Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - By the way, this picture should definitely be submitted to COM:QIC, and it's a possible FP as well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you very kind but my commitment is to be useful. Only the VI label makes sense to me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

• Perhaps I'll submit it to QIC for you, as I think that when a photo is not only a VI but also a QI, it probably seems like a better photo to users. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

• Now nominated to QIC, for what that's worth. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Alvise (Venice) interior - Consecration of Saint Louis as Bishop of Toulouse by Pietro Damini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Slaunger (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think the scope is not very clear. May I suggest "Consecration as bishop of Saint Louis of Toulouse by Pietro Damani" ?--Jebulon (talk) 22:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is a translation error. Thank you for your vigilance. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
    • It was still missing an "as", which I added, and "Bishop of Toulouse" is a title that should be capitalized, especially as part of the title of an artwork. Finally, to set the title off from the author, I added italics. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Tettigonia

Hi. Thx for checking the image of GrasshopperPl.JPG. Please change the description. You can also describe the reason of changing at the image, it wiill be very interesting. I'm not the expert in this field. Have a nice day. --Adam majewski (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

• It is the black spines at the posterior part of the legs that make the difference. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx tattina mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mantis religiosa (European Mantis) male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Tough call because of the blurred head, but it just makes it for me. The FP doesn't show all abdomen and the other image with black background isn't quite as detailed. Charles (talk) 12:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx wilemani mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 12:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Vendramin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. James the Less Altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx wilemani mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support ok for me Olivier LPB (talk) 00:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Vendramin -Arcangel Raphael and Tobias by Titian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful Olivier LPB (talk) 00:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Incredulity of St Thomas with Bishop Magno by Cima da Conegliano, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope Olivier LPB (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

 Support --Tiven2240 (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca lefeburii mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte de la Malvasia (Venice) in Cannaregio - NW exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - St. Vincent between Saints Dominic Lawrence giustiniani, Elena and Pope Eugene IV by Palma il Vecchio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca lefeburii mounted specimen Male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Sagredo of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Altar in marquetry of polychrome stones, in the style of the brothers Corbarelli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Morosini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The one and only. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx naga MHNT CUT 2010 0 95 Sa Pa, Lào Cai, Viêt Nam, male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx naga MHNT CUT 2010 0 95 Sa Pa, Lào Cai, Viêt Nam, male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx shervillii MHNT CUT 2010 0 24 Taiping Perak Malaisia female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manduca lefeburii MHNT CUT 2010 0 109 Ecuador Male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 07:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius ypsilon MHNT CUT 2010 0 32 Osayacu Napo male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius ypsilon MHNT CUT 2010 0 32 Osayacu Napo male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius ypsilon MHNT CUT 2010 0 32 Yanayacu Napo female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius ypsilon MHNT CUT 2010 0 32 Yanayacu Napo female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius gannascus cubanus MHNT CUT 2010 0 88 Arroyo Bermejo La Habana Cuba - male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acherontia styx styx MHNT CUT 2010 0 36 Ban Keum Laos Female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acherontia styx styx MHNT CUT 2010 0 36 Ban Keum Laos Female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acherontia styx styx MHNT CUT 2010 0 36 Cambodge male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acherontia styx styx MHNT CUT 2010 0 36 Cambodge male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius donysa MHNT CUT 2010 0 31 La Esperanza Oaxaca Mexico male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx shervillii MHNT CUT 2010 0 24 Taiping Perak Malaisia female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca lefeburii mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful Olivier LPB (talk) 23:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Morosini - Crucifixion by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. James the Less.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Morosini - Angel carrying the censer (left) by Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Please add Category:Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Morosini to the file. After you do, this should be promoted as useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Oops, I had forgotten three pictures in the chapels thank you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you for taking and submitting the picture.  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Domenico Fetti - La meditazione Gallerie dell'Accademia Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I know you try really hard for a high level of fidelity in reproducing the colors you see, but I'm troubled by the prominent area of glare on the left side of the painting in this candidate. I find it distracting and feel that it limits the usefulness of this photo. Would you consider de-glaring the photo? Otherwise, I may feel impelled to oppose its promotion to VI, not in favor of File:Domenico fetti, la meditazione, 1618 ca. 01.jpg, which I consider too dark and not nearly as detailed as your picture, but on the basis that in its current version, I feel that it does not illustrate its subject well enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Done I had not paid attention to this point which can actually be ameliorated. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Much better. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elibia dolichus MHNT CUT 2010 0 62 Kanchanaburi Thailand male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elibia dolichus MHNT CUT 2010 0 62 Kanchanaburi Thailand male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elibia dolichus MHNT CUT 2010 0 62 Laos female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elibia dolichus MHNT CUT 2010 0 62 Laos female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erinnyis obscura obscura MHNT CUT 2010 0 48 Limbo Chapare Cochabamba Bolivia female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca lefeburii mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Tiven2240 (talk) 09:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca lefeburii bossardi mounted specimen dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 17:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Tiven2240 (talk) 07:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Left side of the nave - Mystic marriage of Saint Catherine of Alexandria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

 Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 07:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padova), monument to Giuseppe Tartini..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madoryx pseudothyreus MHNT CUT 2010 0 37 Sanibel island Florida male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madoryx pseudothyreus MHNT CUT 2010 0 37 Sanibel island Florida male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manduca andicola MHNT CUT 2010 0 106 Tingo María, Huánuco male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manduca andicola MHNT CUT 2010 0 106 Tingo María, Huánuco male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manduca boliviana MHNT CUT 2010 0 105 Santa Cruz Department (Bolivia) male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca lefeburii bossardi mounted specimen ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. Gregory the Great.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca incisa mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 15:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Contarini - Monument to Carlo di Alvise Contarini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mythological Scene by Francesco Maffei, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daphnis moorei MHNT CUT 2010 0 43 ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dllu 04:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanis undulosa MHNT CUT 2010 0 23 Pulau Assan Indonesia ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dllu 04:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanis bilineata formosana MHNT CUT 2010 0 72 Wushe Taiwan male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanis bilineata formosana MHNT CUT 2010 0 72 Wushe Taiwan male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanis pratti MHNT CUT 2010 0 104 Ambon Male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanis pratti MHNT CUT 2010 0 104 Ambon Male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanis undulosa MHNT CUT 2010 0 23 Pulau Assan Indonesia dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erinnyis obscura obscura MHNT male ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Craspedortha porphyria MHNT CUT 2010 0 99 male Thong Pha Phum National Park Thailand dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Craspedortha porphyria MHNT CUT 2010 0 99 male Thong Pha Phum National Park Thailand ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daphnis moorei MHNT CUT 2010 0 43 dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:09, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca incisa mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful and best in scope Olivier LPB (talk) 17:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Morosini - Angel carrying the censer (right) by Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Martyrdom of St. James the Less by Carlo Cagliari.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca incisa mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 10:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Contarini - Monument to Alvise Contarini (1521-1579).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of a Lady by Bernardino Licinio, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and only one in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erinnyis obscura obscura MHNT CUT 2010 0 48 Limbo Chapare Cochabamba Bolivia female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erinnyis obscura obscura MHNT male dos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha analis MHNT CUT 2010 0 8 Santa Catarina dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha analis MHNT CUT 2010 0 8 Santa Catarina ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca incisa mounted female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
David by Domenico Fetti, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and certainly best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of the Doge Orso II Participazio .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose The proposed scope for this image is inappropriate as it concentrates on the church and not the portrait. However the scope "Orso II Participazio" or "Doge Orso II Participazio" would both be excellent choices of scope for the image. If the scope is changed to one of these or something similar, I will support this nomination. May I also note that this image is used in 24 Wikipedia artciles (in different languages). Of those 24 articles, 13 relate to Orso II Participazio himself, 8 to lists of Doges of Venice and only 3 to the church. Martinvl (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment There are in the San Mauro chapel of the Madonna dell'Orto several dozens of portraits all dating from 1662 and featuring little known saints; For some it is even the only representation. This collection is very well known and very poorly exposed. I'm starting to try to make this inventory. The scope could be the one proposed to you and nothing is opposed to that this image is again represented with this scope. The current scope is perfectly defined and is in no way an obstacle. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment, @Martinvl: don't forget that a single image may be nominated several times, each time with a different scope. Are you saying this image simply does not belong in this scope, or that you think there is another scope it could be nominated under too? DeFacto (talk). 07:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Info @DeFacto: - I have already given my answer - see my statement above. Martinvl (talk) 08:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

 Support, is OK for me, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support per DeFacto. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I see no problems. Excellent work (but @DeFacto: I've never heard of the idea that "a single image may be nominated several times, each time with a different scope".) 11:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

• Hi @Charlesjsharp and Charles: The ability to promote images multiple times with different scopes is provided in our rules but for me it remains a curiosity (A dangerous curiosity probably). If the scope is clear and refers, at least to a category, there is no problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
• Charles, per Archaeodontosaurus really, but I've never seen it happen (although I've only been interested in VI for about 18 months, or so), but it's in black and white here: Commons:Valued image scope#Concurrent and overlapping scopes, 3rd sentence. DeFacto (talk). 18:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Picture and scope are fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 07:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 22:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

-- DeFacto (talk). 20:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha obliquus MHNT CUT 2010 0 55 Guadeloupe male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha obliquus MHNT CUT 2010 0 55 Guadeloupe male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha obliquus MHNT CUT 2010 0 55 Neufchâteau Sainte Marie Guadeloupe Female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 20:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha obliquus MHNT CUT 2010 0 55 Neufchâteau Sainte Marie Guadeloupe Female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 20:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha satellitia excessus MHNT CUT 2010 0 8 Rio Verde de Mato Grosso dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca ochus mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. Gregory the Great Altar in polychrome stones in the style of the Corbarelli family.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prayer in the Garden by Marco Basaiti, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha satellitia posticatus MHNT CUT 2010 0 8 Guantánamo female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha satellitia posticatus MHNT CUT 2010 0 8 Guantánamo female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha satellitia posticatus MHNT CUT 2010 0 8 La Habana male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha satellitia posticatus MHNT CUT 2010 0 8 La Habana male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eumorpha satellitia excessus MHNT CUT 2010 0 8 Rio Verde de Mato Grosso ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanis bilineata bilineata MHNT CUT 2010 0 104 Ban Van Heun Laos male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanis bilineata bilineata MHNT CUT 2010 0 104 Ban Van Heun Laos male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cechenena lineosa MHNT CUT 2010 0 22 Ban Kheun Oudomxay Province Laos female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cechenena lineosa MHNT CUT 2010 0 22 Ban Kheun Oudomxay Province Laos female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanis bilineata bilineata MHNT CUT 2010 0 104 Ban Van Heun Laos female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca ochus mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lio (Venice) - Gussoni chapel - Relief of Lamentation of Christ by Tullio Lombardo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pope Gregory I who invokes the Virgin for the end of the plague in Rome by Sebastiano Ricci.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanis bilineata mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope17:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio Madonna dell'Orto (Venice). View from ponte Madonna dell'Orto East exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope - and beautiful --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Contarini - Monument to Alvise Contarini (1597-1651).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope and useful --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca ochus mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - right side of the nave - Madonna with child by Antonio Rizzo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George, the Princess and the Dragon by Marco Basaiti, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx anceus subdentata MHNT CUT 2010 0 98, Mudumalai National Park, Tamil Nadu ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx anceus subdentata MHNT CUT 2010 0 98, Mudumalai National Park, Tamil Nadu, male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx shervillii MHNT CUT 2010 0 23 Ban Kheum Laos Male Dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx shervillii MHNT CUT 2010 0 23 Ban Kheum Laos Male Ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius donysa MHNT CUT 2010 0 31 La Esperanza Oaxaca Mexico male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca ochus mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzi Donà (Venice) - The right palace, in Campo Santa Maria Formosa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius donysa MHNT CUT 2010 0 31 San Cristóbal de Las Casas Mexico female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius donysa MHNT CUT 2010 0 31 San Cristóbal de Las Casas Mexico female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius globifer MHNT CUT 2010 0 88 Estado de México male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius globifer MHNT CUT 2010 0 88 Estado de México male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx bakeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 25 Philippines dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 16:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. Daniel of Padua.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

File File:Accademia - Madonna col Bambino tra i santi Girolamo, Benedetto, Maddalena e Giustina Cat82 Benedetto Rusconi detto Diana.jpg

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, I just want to point out, that cats like November 2016 in Venice are strange for me only for paintings. If I had a wish free I would ask you to take a photo of Saint Mark's basilica, I do not think there is one good one. Possibly Will be there in August. Regards--Oursana (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC).

Hi, The catagory date are useful as sort keys for me. They have no other interest. I will make an effort for St Mark because I do not like this church ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Merci, and I am sorry for S Marks. The facade has some interesting structures and statues. It would be great to have a good picture here.--Oursana (talk) 12:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca tucumana mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lio (Venice) - Canaletto's tomb.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Call of the Sons of Zebedee by Marco Basaiti , Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

A mislabeling in VIC nomination

Hello. You mistakenly declared Commons:Valued image candidates/Kelsey-Grammer-May-5-2010.jpg "declined", but there was one "support" vote. Would you amend the status please. --George Ho (talk) 05:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

• Ok I'll take care of it in a few hours --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Photo

Ça ne se voit peut-être pas, mais il s'agit d'un très bel individu.

Bonjour Didier ! J'espère que tout va bien pour toi. J'ai pris récemment cette photo, dans l'optique d'en faire le portrait de cette espèce : il s'agissait d'un adulte de très belle taille, en pleine forme, et particulièrement caractéristique. J'ai essayé d'en faire une photo qui montre bien toutes les particularités de l'espèce, et compte donc la proposer en VI. Cependant, c'était un peu profond pour mon appareil sans lampe, et du coup l'image est encore un peu bleu-vert... Saurais-tu m'y faire mettre un petit coup de baguette magique (toi ou quelqu'un de confiance) avant que je ne la soumette ? Merci beaucoup et bien cordialement, FredD (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Salut Fred,

Je t'ai fait deux essais mais ce n'est pas très facile, voit si çà te va. (sur ton Email) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca tucumana mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Contarini - Monument to Gasparo Contarini (1483-1542).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. Daniel of Padua - Martyrdom of Saint Daniel by Antonio Zanchi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx clavata MHNT CUT 2010 0 78 Wiang Pa Pao Chiang Rai Thailand male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Rhynchophorus ferrugineus

Hello, I sorted out that you added the Museum specimen - to the page Rhynchophorus ferrugineus - page. If the older pictures are correct, they mean, that the brush on the snout has the male, not the female. I tried to varify this, but I found no confirmation, nor refutation. But if it correct, than the museum specimen must be a male, not a female, because it has a brush. I don't know, what is correct, but either the pictures of the snouts or the Museum specimen are sorted wrong. If you know, please alter it. --Siga (talk) 16:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

• This is a male, we have corrected the error on the specimen record. Thank you for your vigilance. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euryglottis guttiventris mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportUseful --Llez (talk) 05:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Contarini - Monument to Tommaso Contarini (1488-1578) by Alessandro Vittoria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Interior - Reliquary of St. Luke the Evangelist (Rear).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx japonica angustifasciata MHNT CUT 2010 0 59 Taiwan male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx japonica japonica MHNT CUT 2010 0 59 Foping National Nature Reserve - Shaanxi Province, China male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 02:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx japonica angustifasciata MHNT CUT 2010 0 59 Taiwan male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx bakeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 25 Philippines ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx clavata MHNT CUT 2010 0 78 Ban Kheum Laos female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx clavata MHNT CUT 2010 0 78 Ban Kheum Laos female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx clavata MHNT CUT 2010 0 78 Wiang Pa Pao Chiang Rai Thailand male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euryglottis albostigmata mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Ducale (Venice) - Porta della carta - Statue of the Doge Francesco Foscari.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. Placidus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx japonica japonica MHNT CUT 2010 0 59 Foping National Nature Reserve - Shaanxi Province, China male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx jordani MHNT CUT 2010 0 10 Morobe Province dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx inouei MHNT CUT 2010 0 100 Sulawesi male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx inouei MHNT CUT 2010 0 100 Sulawesi male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euryglottis albostigmata mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of the Doge Pietro I Orseolo .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna col Bambino in trono e santi - Cima da Conegliano, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. The definitive, of course.--Jebulon (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx schauffelbergeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 87 Matsuyama, Ehime Japan - male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx schauffelbergeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 87 Matsuyama, Ehime Japan - male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx sericeipennis okurai MHNT CUT 2010 0 86 Wushe Taiwan male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx jordani MHNT CUT 2010 0 10 Morobe Province ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Selbymay 08:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx moorei MHNT CUT 2010 0 47 Dawna Range Thailand dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Selbymay 08:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx moorei MHNT CUT 2010 0 47 Dawna Range Thailand ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Selbymay 08:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adhemarius donysa mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lio (Venice), Main altar Dead Christ supported by angels and saints by Palma the Younger.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - right side of the nave - Altar of the Immaculate Conception (1593).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx sericeipennis okurai MHNT CUT 2010 0 86 Wushe Taiwan male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx staudingeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 19 Philippines female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx staudingeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 19 Philippines female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adhemarius donysa mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of St. Sernin, Toulouse, France - Bust of Saint Louis de Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Flagellation of Christ by Matteo Ponzone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx staudingeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 19 Philippines male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would feel better if the banding or whatever it is from the light were reduced, but overall this is still a QI for me. --Crisco 1492 10:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx staudingeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 19 Philippines male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would feel better if the banding or whatever it is from the light were reduced, but overall this is still a QI for me. --Crisco 1492 10:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx semifervens MHNT CUT 2010 0 25 Ambon island Indonesia dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good detail given the specimen's size --Daniel Case 02:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adhemarius gannascus cubanus mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 11:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio della Sensa (Venice) - from "Ponte de la Malvasia" to "Ponte del Forno".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx ochracea MHNT CUT 2010 0 87 Chiang Mai Thailand male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Daniel Case 20:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx schauffelbergeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 87 Matsuyama, Ehime Japan - female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, this works --Daniel Case 20:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx tattina MHNT CUT 2010 0 100 Philippines male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one works too --Daniel Case 20:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adhemarius gannascus cubanus male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pala di San Giobbe by Giovanni Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx ochracea MHNT CUT 2010 0 87 Chiang Mai Thailand male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The martyrdom of Saint Placide and his companions by Luca Giordano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 14:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Altarpiece of St John Baptist with Saints Peter, Mark, Jerome, and Paul, by Cima da Conegliano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 14:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euryglottis dognini mounted speciemen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museo del Settecento Veneziano, Ca' Rezzonico, Venice - Veiled lady (Puritas) by Antonio Corradini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please check the linked category --Llez (talk) 18:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Oops Thanks ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of Saint Maurus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx schauffelbergeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 87 Matsuyama, Ehime Japan - female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment That green tint, is it CA, or is the white balance off?--Peulle 15:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Support Definitely no CA - QI for me --Uoaei1 07:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

mounted specimens

I know it's from another place of learning, but it would be useful if these images were better categorised. I think you are better placed to discuss this with the people from Rennes. File:Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région afrotropicale, boîte 2.jpg. Charles (talk) 13:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

• Hi, Charles

This type of montage is made only for didactic purposes and does not have a great museological interest. I am not inclined to include this image for each species that are in the box. The category in which it is, seems to me sufficient. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euryglottis dognini mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - right side of the nave - Monument to Girolamo Cavazza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of Saint Julian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Asian_Pear_Blossom_gallery

I took many more photos of the Raja cultivar of Asian Pears (different scope from the one that just got supported). I picked these to upload: User_talk:PumpkinSky#Asian_Pear_Blossom_gallery. I was wondering if you could be so kind as to comment there and let me know if any are VI-worthy or if I should delete some too. Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 20:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

I've made a slightly cropped version of photo 7 and put both of them and the current VI for Pyrus pyrifolia in an MVR. It's my first one and hope I did it correctly. PumpkinSky talk 13:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euryglottis albostigmata female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Place Saintes-Scarbes (Toulouse) France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - St. Peter’s Vision of the Cross by Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:31, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachysphinx modesta mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Altarpiece of Saint Christopher, copy after Cima da Conegliano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of Saint Felicity.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euryglottis albostigmata mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Charles (talk) 17:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of Antonio Correr .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 09:04, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of Saint Luke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 21:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca muscosa mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View from the Torricelle Bridge to Bridge Gregorio Barbarigo in Padua.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Jerome, Louis of Toulouse and Andrew by Tintoretto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca muscosa mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:01, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Madonna of Constantinople - Sixteenth-century version.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Presentation of the Virgin by Jacopo Tintoretto Madonna dell'Orto (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please check category. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

promoted

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Contarini - Monument to Tommaso Contarini (1562-1614).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christ in Pieta by Cima da Conegliano, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poliana leucomelas mounted specimen male dorsal.jpg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Undo

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus. Pourquoi? Merci--Pierpao.lo (listening) 09:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

• Bonjour, tu as enlever une catégorie qui est utile, pour sur-catégoriser. Le bâtiments est bien sur les deux rues et Musée des Augustin, l'aile Darcy - Viollet-le-duc fait déjà partie de la catégorie Musée des Augustin. Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poliana leucomelas mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 12:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volto Santo chapel, called Dei Lucchesi, in Venice. SW exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Contarini - The miracle of Saint Agnes by Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca quinquemaculata mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:18, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte de la Madona (Venice) on rio del Tentor - SE exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - The beheading of St. Paul by Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca quinquemaculata mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful Charles (talk) 10:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Martyrdom of Saints Cosmas and Damian by Antonio Balestra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House of the notary Jean Dumas, in Rue Henri-de-Gorsse (Toulouse).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca muscosa mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - The Annunciation by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Corridor of the Martyrs - The old cage of St Luke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca muscosa mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 19:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Salvatore (Venice) - Theodore of Amasea.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:52, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lamentation over the Dead Christ by Giovanni Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca quinquemaculata mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 22:48, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Nicolò dei Mendicoli (Venice) - High Altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique or at least clearly best in scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meeting at the Golden Gate with Saint Louis and Liberata by Francesco Vittore Carpaccio, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca quinquemaculata mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - The Worship of the Golden Calf by Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. Is the photo grainy, or is it simply accurately representing damage in the upper and lower parts of the painting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:45, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Many paintings of this church are in a very poor state of conservation. Some have been removed and have been restored and are exhibited at the Accademia Museum. Some are damaged to the point that I do not consider them good enough to be presented in VI. This one is more than 14 m in height with many anomalies of conservation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Massacre of the Innocents by Sebastiano Galvano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

The Valued Image Barnstar!

		The Valued Image Barnstar
		For the diligent contributions to the VI scope. Bonne journée! ~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca sesquiplex mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 17:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Nicolò dei Mendicoli (Venice) bas-relief in marble of Saint Nicolas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, you might want to double-check the scope category choice. DeFacto (talk). 22:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Oops --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:06, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Sebastian between SS. Liberalis and Gregory, Francis and Roch by Giovanni Mansueti, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, stunning, useful and only one in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

VI scope question

I was lucky and had a bee pollinating while taking some photos of fruit tree flowers. Without the bee, my scope would be "Pyrus pyrifolia (Asian Pear) Shinko cultivar inflorescence"; but since a bee is pollinating the flower, what would the scope be? Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 21:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

@PumpkinSky: Ok I found your image. Here is a scope that might be suitable. ''{{c|Pyrus pyrifolia}}'' pollinated by ''Apis mellifera''. Damage the bee is blurred; f/2 is a bad choice. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. You can't change the f-stop on my smartphone, a Google Pixel. I've been looking into getting a macro lens for it or maybe coughing up money for a good macro camera. But flowering season is almost over for us this year.... Thanks again for your kind help.PumpkinSky talk 12:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

What's a good f-stop for macro photos? I've been reading to learn more about this topic. PumpkinSky talk 12:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Alas impossible to make quality macrophoto on our phones. Unless the plane of the subject is not very thick, and if it is motionless. Think to the forced flash, this is where you will have the best result. It is better to have a reflex. You will find it at a low price, second-hand. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Image

Hello, Je vais bientôt essayer de soumettre cet article en BA. L'animal n'a été observé que 3 fois dans son histoire, dont la dernière il y a 2 semaines, avec des photos domaine public haute résolution. En vois-tu une qui pourrait prétendre à un label ? Merci et bon dimanche, FredD (talk) 08:09, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Bel article. Le renvoi sur wikispecies se fait dans le vide tu pourrais faire un renvoie sur le genre. Deux images ont un logo, ce qui est interdit sur Commons. Il est facile de l’enlever. L’image de la box me parais la meilleure pour l’anatomie de la bête. Elle sera bien accueilli en VI. Reste le problème des intégristes du géocodage: ont demandera une indulgence du fait du caractère exceptionnel du sujet. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Géocoder un animal dérivant dans les abysses... C'est plutôt la coordonnée verticale qui importe ici ! Je fais la proposition, merci ! FredD (talk) 15:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca sesquiplex mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - St. Jerome and St. Augustine, by Girolamo da Santacroce.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Interior - Reliquary of St. Luke the Evangelist and transept organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca vestalis mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Nicolò dei Mendicoli (Venice) Porch of the north entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please check the catogory (must be "exterior") --Llez (talk) 13:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Done thanks--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - right side of the nave - The tomb of Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca vestalis mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 18:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of a Gentleman in his Study by Lorenzo Lotto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 09:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apatura ilia f. clytie mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment "...mounted specimen male dorsal" (as in your other nominations) would be a better scope --Llez (talk) 19:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Done You are right. Do you know why I like photography? Because my dyslexia does not see too much ... but a little in the scopes --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of Blessed Niccolò Giustinian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of Arnaldo da Limena.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx japonica japonica mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campanile of San Nicolò dei Mendicoli (Venice) on campiello de l'oratorio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Don't you think that image should be connected within this scope! ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Take advantage of your youth, becoming old is often mistaken --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
  • I hope it isn't too petty, but isn't the scope tautological now with "Campanile" and "bell tower"? I would remove the last one. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 06:42, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
    • This illustrates well what I said... Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
      • Thanks, IMHO better.  Best in Scope. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 07:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, all criteria met. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 17:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apatura ilia f. clytie Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Is the scope correct? Some websites have it as "Apatura ilia ssp. ilia f. clytie" Charles (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

• Yes it is its full name which is not very used. The name of the scope is the most common.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. feminist (talk) 16:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of church st. Daniel of Padua.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 17:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. feminist (talk) 16:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - The faith by Pietro Ricchi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. feminist (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Donald Tusk (6165309851).jpg

Hello. I changed the status to promoted as I saw it closed. --George Ho (talk) 04:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

When an image is closed the vote is vested. The robot only saves it. Changes that have been made are not permitted. We must wait until the end of the process to ask for a revision of the vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx japonica japonica mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel St Mauro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Cosmas and Damian saved by the angel by Antonio Balestra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Kindness Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Archaeodontosaurus, Ikan Kekek, El Grafo, and Charles; you have all been very kind and helpful in showing how the VI and QI processes work (I'm nowhere near the FP level yet as you know) and giving me tips on taking better pictures. I know I have a lot to learn about photos. I do truly appreciate all your help. PumpkinSky talk 21:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca huascara mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building called Maison romano-gothique in Toulouse - Gothic door.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - St Lawrence Giustiniani and saints.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Daniel of Padua - Nave and choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. But I think the scope should be the Italian name, "San Daniele (Padua)", with nave and choir then specified. Italian churches are most commonly called by their Italian names in English, with the exception of St. Peter's and maybe one or two other really world-famous ones (San Marco in Venice probably being one of them). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
• This is a question I have often asked myself. But I chose to follow the COMMONS recommendations. We speak in English for a better understanding. Even you: you introduced the name Padua in English whereas it makes say Padova in Italian in your proposal of scope. I think it's better to stay on English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

• That wasn't conscious. But the thing is, the name of the church is San Daniele. Should we make the scope of the Museo del Capodimonte the "Museum of the Top of the Mountain"? How about making the scope of Piazzale Michelangelo "Big Michael-Angel Square"? Where should we draw the line? Maybe the talk page is better for discussing this, but I'm curious to see your replies. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
• Using common sense is best so nothing wrong with "San Daniele (Padua)". There is no overall right answer here, except that Padova would be wrong. But I have corrected st. in the scope to St. Charles (talk) 11:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

• I am convinced by your arguments and I will leave the local name for the building and the text in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - St. George slaying the dragon by Matteo Ponzone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduca huascara mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 04:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Excellent image.--ÂkBY$ 15:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meganoton analis sumatranus female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building called Maison romano-gothique in Toulouse. Twin bays in rue Croix-Bragnon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - The <<à vendre>> sign is funny, but the photo is useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

As soon as it is sold and the panel is gone I will correct this image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Mark's Body Brought to Venice by Tintoretto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meganoton analis sumatranus female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 17:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Left side of the nave - God the Father in Glory by Domenico Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - It seems glary in places, or is that just damage to the fresco? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

I confirm the very bad state of this work. The building has been undergoing major renovations in recent years. It is hoped that works of art will also benefit from this dynamic. They do not belong to the state but to the clergy, which complicates matters a little.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Thanks. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Maur invoked by the sick. by Valentin Le Fèvre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Best in scope, but please point to Category:Santa Giustina (Padua) - St. Maurus the Abbot by Valentin Le Fèvre. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks. All the less forgivable, since I was the one who made the renaming. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachysphinx modesta mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna and Child, with st.Paul and st.George by Giovanni Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and only one in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Interior - Baptismal fonts.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachysphinx modesta mounted specimen femal dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Presentation of Jesus at the temple by Francesco Bissolo, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

The figures look like cutouts. Is that how they really look in the painting? Because if so, I think the painting was damaged in "restoration" (it wouldn't be the first time). However, I'll  Support this as useful, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Good observation. This point is not related to the restoration, nor to Francesco Bissolo. Many of the paintings of this period have this peculiarity. It is linked to the fact that the characters are painted by the master and the background landscaped by the assistants. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

• Really? That's interesting, but that was common practice with many great paintings, too. If the painting really looked like this and hasn't been overcleaned, it's a real artistic failure, in my opinion. But anyway, still useful. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:53, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of Titian of Oderzo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachysphinx modesta mounted specimen femal ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament - Altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - The Last Judgment by Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament - Ceiling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba sperchius mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Madonna and Child with Saint Maurus by Antonio Molinari.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 05:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx tattina MHNT CUT 2010 0 100 Philippines male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx tenimberi MHNT CUT 2010 10 Sulawesi dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx tenimberi MHNT CUT 2010 10 Sulawesi ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx wildei MHNT CUT 2010 0 25 Wau Morobe New Guinea male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

revert

Um ... why? Was that a redundant top-level cat? Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Lepidoptera is the right choice. Moth is a derelict term that must be abandoned. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:12, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

OK, I can understand since the generic name doesn't allow us to differentiate there. But you could have just moved it up into the Leipdoptera category. Daniel Case (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

That's exactly what I wanted to do; But that I missed perfectly. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

About "reason" in a VIC

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, First of all, thank you for your support to my VIC. I contact with you because I am interested in know why remove the reason Revision of 240564084 in my VIC. It is mainly a curiosity, to know if I shouldn't write again in a proposal like this. I think that it is important to know why one user propose an image to be a Valued Image.

Thanks in advance!

Regards, Ivanhercaz | Discusión 16:02, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Maybe this category (Images by Archaeodontosaurus Padua) should be a hidden cat. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

• This is too technical a point for me; Maybe you could ask an administrator I suggest you ask Christian Ferrer. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
• Hi Didier, I think Ivanhercaz want to know why you removed [1] their sentence in the field "reason". Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

I knew you were the man of the situation. Thank you, you are the best. I corrected my mistake. At 7 pm I leave my brain in the office to retrieve it the next day... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you both, Archaeodontosaurus and Christian Ferrer. Don't worry, it was a logical mistake, I understand you. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

P. S. I'm sorry, but I made a mistake when I told you my issue about your category, because I don't write : before the word "Category", so I categorize this page and it isn't showing the text, I quote here corrected:

Maybe this category (Images by Archaeodontosaurus Padua) should be a hidden cat. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 18:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

For sure, I had not seen it and corrected it. Thank you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your welcome! Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba sperchius mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of the Patriarch of Grado St.Francesco Querini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 05:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Choir and High Altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, all criteria met. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 22:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulyx wildei MHNT CUT 2010 0 25 Wau Morobe New Guinea male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail work --Daniel Case 19:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba spectabilis mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and used. The best in the scope. Ivanhercaz | Discusión 13:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Daniele (Padua)- interior - The discovery of the relics of Saint Daniel, in the basilica of Saint Justine by Sebastiano Santi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Presentation of Jesus in the Temple by Francesco Vittore Carpaccio, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba spectabilis malayana dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - High Altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St.Peter by Giovanni Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

About VISC to be promoted

Hi Archaeodontosaurus,

I am trying to improve my activity in the review of Valued Images, because I don't only want to promote photographs. I think that I can contribute in this task, for this reason I want to know if any user can give the result of the nomination, because I have seen there is some nominations that can be approved. If the answer is yes, that I can to help in this task, is there any template to proceed? Or, do I just copy the code of a result and adapt it to the nomination that I am going to promoted?

Thanks in advance.

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 01:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi,

I am very happy with your decision because there is a lot of work. You can close the contest for images as soon as the message appears. It is only necessary to pay attention to one point: the image can only be closed if the last vote took place 48 hours before. Simply copying and adapting the code is not difficult. Thanks for your help. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer! All right, I will consider the 48 hours before to not proceed wrongly. Yes, I have there is so much promotions and you are one of the main users that review that. Okay, I will copy the text to help in this task.

See you in Valued Image Candidates pages (and Commons in general)!

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 13:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

To begin I have promoted some nominations. I have stopped my work when I didn't see the text that "May be promoted if the last vote was...". When appear this text? When the image is ready to be finally review (promoted or declined)?

Thanks in advance!

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 14:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes there is an internal chronological count for each appointment. So that there is the same time for everyone. We have to wait for the message to appear. But it sometimes appears before the 48 hours that separates us from the last vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

All right. I will wait for the message and then, I will confirm that the moment when I promoted or decline the image is after the 48 hours that you have said. Thanks again. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marumba sperchius MHNT CUT 2010 0 120 Gifu Japan Male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachysphinx modesta MHNT CUT 2010 0 119 Marathon Co Wisconsin femal ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachysphinx modesta MHNT CUT 2010 0 119 Marathon Co Wisconsin femal dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba spectabilis malayan Ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of La Pieta by Filippo Parodi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Miracle of the Relic of the Holy Cross in Campo San Lio by Giovanni Mansueti, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I'm not familiar with this work, but purely on the basis of quality and ease of viewing details, this is clearly the best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba gaschkewitschii carstanjeni moutned specimen ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of saint Maximus of Padua.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, useful and used. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Virgin and Child with St. John the Baptist by Vincenzo Catena, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, useful. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba gaschkewitschii carstanjeni mounted specimen dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and used. The best in the scope. Ivanhercaz | Discusión 16:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Santamarcanda (talk) 02:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Daniele of Padua - The martyrdom of Saint Daniel by Sebastiano Santi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and used. The best in the scope. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Santamarcanda (talk) 02:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of La Pieta - Sculpture of the Piéta by Filippo Parodi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and used. The best in the scope. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose definitely not the best in that scope. Furthermore, this scope is used some nominations above, see Commons:Valued image candidates/Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of La Pieta.jpg. Maybe a detail information is missing here? --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 22:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Certainly, Carschten. I didn't notice that the scope is similar with the photo you have linked. Archaeodontosaurus, could you specify this scope? Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 00:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
    • @Carschten: The scope did not give enough information. It is the statue group called La Pieta realized by Filippo Parodi that is the subject. The elements anexes of the chapel were realized by his workshop. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
      • Problem corrected, so no longer a reason to oppose. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 07:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Santamarcanda (talk) 02:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Daniele of Padua - The martyrdom of Saint Daniel by Sebastiano Santi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and used. The best in the scope. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Santamarcanda (talk) 02:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba nympha mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Daniele of Padua - The transport of the body of St. Daniel by Sebastiano Santi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of Saint Matthias.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba nympha mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Good morning,

This photo File:Mountain drive from the parking lot at central Malga Mare to Lago Lungo 44.jpg is repeatedly approved.
Kind regards,
--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:45, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marumba nympha Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:25, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria dei Servi (Padua) and loggiato del Campolongo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I would suggest linking this to the Commons category, not the non-category page. Do you agree? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
• Why not, both can be done. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
• IMO the scope is OK, hence:  Best in Scope. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
• Yes, the scope is now fine.  Support per Palauenc05. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The mission of the Apostles by Giovanni Battista Bissoni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Santamarcanda (talk) 02:37, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morwennius decoratus Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 21:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria dei Servi (Padua) - View of the interior of the church..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Tomb of Saint Matthias - Tomb of Saint Matthias..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please check the category. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:32, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Oops Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morwennius decoratus mounted specimen, female, ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 17:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria dei Servi (Padua) - The Virgin save a condemned to breaking wheel by Matteo Ghidoni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Corridor of the Martyrs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 17:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Daphnusa ocellaris mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria dei Servi (Padua) - Interior - The baptismal font of the 17th century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:53, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Sinibald by Sebastiano del Piombo Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:53, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Daphnusa ocellaris mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 04:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Corridor of the Martyrs - The Well of the Martyrs .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria dei Servi (Padua) - Altare dell'Addolorata by Rinaldino di Francia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eupanacra radians mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and used. Ivanhercaz (talk) 19:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria dei Servi (Padua) - Interior - View of the choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 17:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Corridor of the Martyrs ceiling by Giacomo Ceruti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 17:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Wat Mae Chon ruins 2 -Sukhothai.JPG

Could you add a French translation of the description to this photo? Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 23:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you but a problem has come up. A native Thai speaker helped me put in a Thai translation but now no matter what I do after you click save it only displays the first language, even though in edit mode you can see all 4 languages. Do you know how to fix this or someone that does? Thanks. PumpkinSky talk 10:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
    • I think I figured it out. After more than 3 languages, a language select button appears and you can select one or all languages. PumpkinSky talk 11:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
      • Look at the other way of proceeding. I have modified the caption --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daphnusa ocellaris MHNT CUT 2010 0 125 Ban Kheum Laos female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daphnusa ocellaris MHNT CUT 2010 0 125 Ban Kheum Laos female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eupanacra radians mounted smpecimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piper borbonense (Voatsiperifery Pepper), Dried fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Definitely the best picture in scope. I'll also call it best in scope as a thumbnail, but that's not a slam dunk: File:Piper borbonense dried fruits.jpg has much bigger fruits as a thumbnail, but no measurement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eupanacra metallica Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria dei Servi (Padua) - The Miraculous Crucifix by Donatello.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, definitely best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)