User talk:Mahagaja

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Angr)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Nevada Prostitution by county.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 15:05, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Emirr

[edit]

Sorry, some (so) late but which map did you mean?  The Emirr Disscussion 12:55, 29 July 2012 (UTC+3)

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Mahagaja. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of your inactivity in the past six months.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at the current inactivity run page within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, OdderBot (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan Episcopal diocesan maps

[edit]

en:Episcopal Diocese of Michigan includes the southern half of en:Clinton County, Michigan, which does not show up on the map currently. I don't know how easy it is for you to change that. I wouldn't have the slightest idea of how to go about doing that, so you are my only hope...--Bhuck (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I updated it, but it seems to be taking a while before it'll show the new thumbnail. —Angr 20:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Awesome map! [1] Thanks for creating it. :) USchick (talk) 19:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What to do with this file

[edit]

Hello.

By browsing uncategorized files, I saw this one from flcker, and I thought first to put a copyvio, but I’m unsure if it’s the convenient procedure. It’s clearly a reproduction of the Los Angeles Times, and I suspect that it isn’t possible to appose a CC BY License on such a reproduction. At the same time, I’m not sure about the rules for the use of a copyvio model on wikimedia, if it is the right procedure in such a case. Also the User page of the uploader don’t encourage me to contact him directly... Katastrov (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted it. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. —Angr 08:46, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Brandenburg Gate 1961-08-13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Map Issue - Episcopal Dioceses of Virginia and Southern Virginia

[edit]

I just noticed slight issues in your maps for the Episcopal Dioceses of Virginia and Southern Virginia. The current maps show the two counties of the Virginia Eastern Shore split across the two dioceses, with Northampton County (the southern one) in the Diocese of Southern Virginia and with Accomack County (the northern one) shown in the Diocese of Virginia. Both counties of the Virginia Eastern Shore are in the Diocese of Southern Virginia--the Southern VA map should have both of those counties in brown, and the VA map should have both of those counties in yellow.

Reference:

http://www.episcopalchurch.org/diocese/virginia

http://www.episcopalchurch.org/diocese/southern-virginia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tegularius (talk • contribs) 01:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tegularius: Fixed, thanks for bringing this to my attention. —Angr 14:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning (Aug 2019)

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Mahagaja. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2019 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

update

[edit]

Dear Mahagaja..Template {{PD-US-no notice}} need a 2020 update.--Maher27777 (talk) 18:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


NY Map

[edit]

What program did you use to add the data from the ny base map onto File:New York blank.svg ? Thanks 420Traveler (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@420Traveler: That was over 13 years ago, so I don't remember for sure, but it might have been Inkscape. —Mahāgaja · talk 13:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mahagaja: Ok thanks, ill check into it. By any chance are you still making maps like that? 420Traveler (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@420Traveler: No, I'm not. I simply don't have the skills required for making maps up to the currently expected quality. Few of the maps I made back in the early to mid 2000's are still in use. —Mahāgaja · talk 13:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

[edit]

@Mahagaja: Please delete it https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kantor_Bupati_Labura.png#, https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SALAH.jpg and https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Goa_Kaca.jpg--Cek Indra (talk) 03:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

[edit]

Dear Mahagaja

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

[edit]

Hello Mahagaja,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please block the page

[edit]

Hello! Please block the vandalism-target photo of Christian Ericsen. That user creates new accounts. Voltmetro 18:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else already has. —Mahāgaja · talk 18:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users

[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File:Philip D. Murphy.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Duplicate of File:Philip D.Murphy.jpg)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : IagoQnsi.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 00:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Malayalam vowel chart

[edit]

Can you make a Malayalam vowel chart too from [2]? AleksiB 1945 (talk) 15:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you can just upload [3] here, as I doubt it reaches the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. —Mahāgaja · talk 18:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

[edit]

Dear Mahagaja, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your admin rights on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2024 before 13th March (UTC), and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months, if you fail to do so you will automatically lose your rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you! -- CptViraj (talk) 20:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack-in-the-box.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 08:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jasper Carrott.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G. It appears the Flickr user likely changed the licenses after the fact, as it ws reviewed after upload to be the license it is on Wikimedia Commons. As per Commons:Flickr, Flickr users may change their licenses after the fact but they are legally not able to revoke a license once it has been re-used to begin with. (btw I'm not sure why I've got Mahagaja's page on my watchlist XD.) Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 21:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]