User:Mizunoryu/II
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Re:Pedido
Eu não usei fonte alguma, as letras tb são imagens.--Econt (talk) 10:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Umas coisinhas
Estive a olhar as tuas contribuições eliminadas e vi que tens muitas marcações de imagens para eliminação, mas raramente usas o sumário de edição nesses casos. É mais fácil para quem dá uma olhada nessas contribuições ver porque razão tens tantos links vermelhos :P.
Há uns scripts que ajudam muito nas marcações de imagens, não sei se usas algum. O Quick Delete e o User Messages são dois gadgets úteis.
Já pensaste em fazer Flickr reviewing?
Não sei se estás a perceber onde estou a querer chegar... rs. Patrícia msg 22:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Eu sei de tudo. -- Mateus Hidalgo 22:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Com exceção da minha (que veio a ptwp inteira votar a favor; hoje eu não teria mais da metade dos votos, briguei com meio mundo desde então xD), as votações para lusófonos terem acesso a algo costumam ser meio escondidas... inclusive a de uma certa ter acesso de burocrata. Mesmo se vierem os amigos da pt.wp, tem a {{!vote}}... Lugusto • ※ 22:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Eu sei o que vocês fazem em praça pública. Não escaparão. -- Mateus Hidalgo 22:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Estamos de olho. -- Mateus Hidalgo 23:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Boiando? Veja esse nome de página: Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Mizunoryu xP Lugusto • ※ 23:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- (conflito)
- hehe, fica tranquilo. Não há nenhum peixe e nem nada com o que se preocupar xD. Só estávamos filosofando sobre certas possibilidades.
Lugusto prometeu desenharcaso você demore demais a sacar =).
Em tempo, ele acaba de desenhar rs. -- Mateus Hidalgo 23:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Mas pra ser administrador você não precisa ser o gênio do wikimarkup... as ferramentas adicionais são reverter com um clique, apagar coisas, proteger outras e bloquear usuários e pra elas basta saber o porque de as usar em certos momentos e em outros momentos não. A formação teórica do que um administrador não deve ser vc tem pelo belos exemplos que vê na pt.wp, o conhecimento de copyright/copyleft vc tem...
- A ferramenta que vem no pacote de ser admin, que é editar certas MediaWiki: meio ninjas (que bloqueiam URLs de serem adicionadas em páginas, por exemplo) é usada por poucos, pouquíssimos... E ninguém se constrange com isso. Lugusto • ※ 02:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Mizu, poderia perguntar na Commons:Help desk#Logos and PD-textlogo pra mim se há consenso que essa imagem possua direitos autorais? A princípio julgaria o símbolo do globo como sendo simples, mas ele tá sob FU na EN então queria tirar a dúvida. Essa área não é muito meu forte e não consigo discernir ainda o limiar entre o que pode ser considerado geometria simples ou não, para efeito de copyright, fora que pra eu perguntar qualquer coisa lá em inglês vou ter que recorrer ao google translator xD. -- Mateus Hidalgo 21:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- É que já falei com outro usuário e este me disse parecer complexo demais (e se bem lembro essa logo já foi carregada aqui e apagada), mas valia perguntar na discussão da página de licenciamento. Pedi pra você pois vi a seção já aberta sobre o mesmo tópico rs. -- Mateus Hidalgo 20:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
PD-Text Logos
Hi, I noticed some of the logos you imported here, and I am a bit skeptical whether the fall under {{PD-textlogo}}. To me something like File:MGS PO.jpg is perfectly ok ; but the likes of File:Resident evil outbreak 2 logo.jpg are creative works. To let you know, I asked for some advice on Commons:Help desk#Logos and PD-textlogo. Sincerly, Jean-Frédéric (talk) 13:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hotter Boy Bartender Assistant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Multichill (talk) 23:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
The Settlers
Hello, I am not sure if Ubisoft really gives an autorisation for all and every product they made. But if this is the case, then you need to paste a template with Ubisoft autorisation to each page. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:11, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- I retored the deleted images. Please note that the autorisation is for "user created screenshots" only. Yann (talk) 13:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Valeu
Valeu Mizu! Bom, mas como vossa majestade disse, acho que vou fazer os prints --' HotWiki (talk) 13:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
TV Senado
Dá uma olhada no que escrevi na Esplanada sobre imagens da TV Senado. Patrícia msg 21:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Foto Sarney
É Agência Brasil, pois todas as fotos oficiais de presidentes são feitas pela Radiobrás... está lá Senado porque acho que esta era a fonte à época do carregamento. Dantadd✉ 15:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
RE: Pizza
Já anotei o recarregamento do arquivo. Gostaria de mais alguma coisa? XD HotWiki (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/PlayStation_Portable.svg/350px-PlayStation_Portable.svg.png)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/PlayStation_Portable_White.svg/350px-PlayStation_Portable_White.svg.png)
Infoboxes Pictograms
Hi, I just saw you can do great pictograms and would like to know if you are able to do some. I want to use them in some infoboxes. I'm needing one for book, a microphone with a music note for singers, a cd with a music note for albuns, factory, ficional character (this one would be great), sports and martial arts and a mix of book, cinema, music and video game for media franchise infobox. If you can not do them, there is no problem. Sorry for bother and thanks for your attention. Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 05:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry but I am not an expert into pictograms making. I almost do maps, and use always the same icons. Sémhur (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.- Image:Ajuda copy.jpg is uncategorized since 29 March 2009.
BotMultichillT 06:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Fui bloqueado pelo Yanguas
Oi, vi que vc comentou na esplanada da wiki-pt. Por favor , me ajude, o Yanguas me bloqueou, só porque eu escrevi na esplanada aquilo que estava na pagina do adm Tilgon. O adm pode escrever o que quiser na pg dele e se eu reproduzo, sou bloqueado? O Yanguas está me perseguindo, ele não pode me bloquear! Por favor me ajuda, obrigado, Um IP (talk) 16:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Obrigado! Um IP (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Microsoft Game Studios logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Yann (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sega logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Yann (talk) 19:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Arc_system_works_logo.png
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Arc_system_works_logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
shizhao (talk) 07:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Deprecated License
It has been found that Image:Picto infobox rocket.png has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Filbot.--Filnik 14:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Ué...
Aqui nem apareceu que ficou transparente nem nos fundos nem na imagem... Poderia ajustar pra mim? ⇨HotWikiⓓ/ⓒ 12:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Eu_odeio_mexer_com_imagens.png e ainda mato um. Sou mais .svg =D. E... eu também vou usar óculos viu, precisa tirar onda não. =P ⇨HotWikiⓓ/ⓒ 18:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Valeu! Hehe... agora tô de boa que meu Firefox ressucitou. Ele tinha morrido e fiquei usando Flock e Netscape... triste. E também to usando óculos =O Bom, muito obrigado pelos ajustes! Deixou as imagens em melhores formatos. ⇨HotWikiⓓ/ⓒ 14:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Olá. Alterei a imagem por causa da cor. Acontece que essa não é a verdadeira cor do símbolo. Positivo (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
About Political logos
I did not exactly delete all of Nature007s' logo uploads. [:File:Partdetrabsoc.jpg] was kept. I checked the logo again, maybe there could be 3 of them that could be kept, now I ain't sure they are worth. (I am going to undelete them temporarily so you can decide for yourself.)
- File:Psdb23.jpg
- File:Proparty.jpg
- File:Fgthyf.png
- File:Fnlap.gif (the other file with flna seems a duplicate of this one.)
The other logos were more like this one present on this page [1] which was imported as File:Corahhh.JPG... Esby (talk) 01:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Licences are fixed for those files, now I have doubts on the description of File:Psdb23.jpg. Seems like a bit of long text, not sure who wrote it... Anyway, 4:22 AM here, gonna sleep... Esby (talk) 02:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing to this page on MetaWiki. It is good reading and I think this page should be widely advertised in Wikimedia projects. Sv1xv (talk) 07:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Dúvidas sobre licenças de imagens
Imagens que eu vou scannear (scanner, escâner), eu coloco que licenças? Se possível, você pode me ajudar? Eu sou novato. Eduardo Pazos (talk) 00:40, 10 May 2009 (UTC) E imagens da internet que eu "salvar imagem como"? Eu coloco que licenças? Eduardo Pazos (talk) 00:40, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Imagem errada
Salve, Mizu, tudo bem? Cara, acho que você está bem mais por dentro do que eu dos meandros aqui do Commons, deve saber me ajudar. Dá uma olhada nesta imagem: File:Isabel Fillardis.jpg, apesar de ter o nome da Isabel Fillardis, tá na cara que não é ela, é uma atriz bem mais jovem (não conheço o seu nome). Tem como isto ser corrigido, ou o artigo deve ser eliminado? Ainda bem que reparei a dica que um IP deu num artigo sobre a Malhação lá na 'pédia, senão teria passado batido (como já estava passando há meses...). Obrigado e um abraço, RafaAzevedo (talk) 21:26, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Solucionando: a atriz chama-se Sharon Menezes. Robertogilnei (talk) 14:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
CPLP
Pois, apagaram de novo, e o problema está que o formato daquele objeto, o "cata-vento", é muito parecido, ainda que não idêntico, ao logotipo da CPLP. Como o logotipo da CPLP não tem seus direitos liberados, e como o objeto é muito parecido, caracteriza-se uma infração autoral, independentemente de eu ter criado a animação. Acho que o mais fácil será pensar numa nova animação, que não incorra no mesmo erro. Muito obrigado pela ajuda!!! =) --Tonyjeff (talk) 14:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Can you please update the Português translation of this template at Template:Noticket/pt? Thanks. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Would you mind doing Template:No OTRS permission since/pt as well? - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
The English text has been changed. Could you have a look at the translation again please? Many thanks. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Black Gameboy Advance icon.png may be deleted
![]() |
Black Gameboy Advance icon.png which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Black Gameboy Advance icon.png") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.
|
HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 15:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Black Nintendo 64 icon.png may be deleted
![]() |
Black Nintendo 64 icon.png which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Black Nintendo 64 icon.png") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.
|
HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 15:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Purple Gameboy Advance icon.png may be deleted
![]() |
Purple Gameboy Advance icon.png which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Purple Gameboy Advance icon.png") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.
|
HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 15:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Silver Playstation 3 icon.png may be deleted
![]() |
Silver Playstation 3 icon.png which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Silver Playstation 3 icon.png") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.
|
HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 15:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Standing Black Playstation 3 icon.png may be deleted
![]() |
Standing Black Playstation 3 icon.png which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Standing Black Playstation 3 icon.png") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.
|
HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 15:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Standing Silver Playstation 3 icon.png may be deleted
![]() |
Standing Silver Playstation 3 icon.png which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Standing Silver Playstation 3 icon.png") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.
|
HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 15:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Super Nintendo icon.png may be deleted
![]() |
Super Nintendo icon.png which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Super Nintendo icon.png") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.
|
HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 15:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Logo infraestructuras
Hi Mizunoryu. Are you sure that this logo is too simply to not delete it? I believed that the copyright cannot apply when includes letters or basic forms, but the present file has a complex figure. Where is the limmit? In addition the logo has been copy-pasted from the official web page, this is allowed? Obrigado, --Montgomery (talk) 01:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Watermelon_icon.png
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Watermelon_icon.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Watermelon_icon.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kam Solusar (talk) 03:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
VP thread
What happened here? You removed my comment when adding yours. Was it a section edit? A full edit? Did you get an edit conflict? Platonides (talk) 20:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
|
File:China Taiwan Pandas.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tectoy_logo_2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 06:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nintendo_Gamecube_logo_2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Huib talk 16:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sonic Team logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-mattbuck (Talk) 16:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Guitar_hero_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 16:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sony_Computer_Entertainment_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 16:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:SNK_NeoGeo_CD_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 16:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:SNK_NeoGeo_Pocket_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 16:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nintendo_64_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 16:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Koei_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:GD-ROM_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Silent_Hill_series_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:02, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Resident_evil_series_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:02, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Resident_evil_3_nemesis_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:03, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Resident_Evil_Code_Veronica_X_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:03, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:KMRB_for_over_18_tag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ignition_entertainment_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Zeebo_sphere_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:SNK_early_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Picasa
Oi, Mizu. Tô navegando pelo Picasa, mas ainda não consegui perceber como entrar em contato com usuários para poder pedir a autorização. Você pode me ajudar? Filipe Ribeiro Msg 01:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ops, foi mal, importei a assinatura da pt-wiki e esqueci de corrigir esse detalhe... Valeu pela ajuda, comecei a tentar entrar em contato com os usuários. Abraço. Filipe Ribeiro Msg 12:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:DVD-ROM_logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 02:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Your recently created page
Hi. You recently created Usuário Discussão:FilRB. Did you mean to add a note to User talk:FilRB? If so, you should move the note from the first page to the second page and add a {{speedy}} tag to the first one. Killiondude (talk) 06:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Vicious cycle software logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--AJCham2097 (talk) 02:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Products' logos
Oh, thanks for info :D. I've thought that it's copyrighted material (because of signs ® and ™) and cannot be used on Commons on free license. Cheers, Sir Lothar (talk) 09:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
PhotoPlus
Olá Mizunoryu. Lembra-se de que há uns 2 meses e meio atrás lá na Wikipédia, você havia me indicado um programa que retira o fundo branco de uma imagem? Pois é, eu baixei esse programa recentemente, porém, não consigo encontrar a tal ferramenta dele que faz isso. Você poderia me ajudar? Transfer (talk) 15:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Favor
Mizu, não estou podendo escrever na minha pagina da discussão, na verdade aquela confraria lá se pela de medo do que eu escrevo. Não estou bloqueado pelos meus termos, mas pelo que eles contém e sabem disso, que a cafajestada deles esta sendo esfregada na cara. Estou lendo grande cinismo da dupla Indech e Marcelo na discussão do meu bloqueio e anotando o que ali é do na car-dura para ajudar na argumentação do pedido de desnomeação do Indech, o segundo, quando for liberado do bloqueio. (E só não o fui por covardia dos outros adms)
Mas por enquanto peço um favor: me chamarem de pulha está tudo certo se eu puder devolver na mesma moeda quando ler, mas estou bloqueado de me expressar. Pode colocar por mim um pedido de bloqueio do tal ts42 lá no Papai me Ajuda por esta frase, na discussão do meu pedido de bloqueio?
E a pergunta que não quer calar: quando eu fui bloqueado, não apareceu ninguém para me defender, mas quando esse pulha é bloqueado, aparecem tantos defensores dos frascos e comprimidos? ts42
O ts 42 é o Tummus, covarde como é, não usa mais o nick. E repare que nenhum dos dois cinicos, Indech e Marelo, deu um pio sobre isso hehehe.
Acho que ali tem dois problemas: certos administradores tratam a comunidade como imbecis, achando que as pessoas não percebem seu cinismo e arbitrariedade nas 'argumentações' que fazem para defender ou criticar isso ou aquilo. Acham que enganam alguém posando de justos e imparciais, mas infelizmente poucos tem boa e firme argumentação ou culhão ali para lhes esfregar na cara suas posiçoes parciais e cínicas - quando comprads com suas atitudes em outros casos - eu sou um dos poucos que faz isso e por isso mesmo me odeiam hehe. A resposta do Marcelo à sua pergunta clara é um poço de cinismo e cafajestada, o cara realmente não tem a menor vergonha na cara de agir aquele jeito. Mas enfim, podes fazer o pedido pra mim? Sds MachoCarioca (talk) 21:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
PS Pra se divertir com a pouca vergonha existente na Wiki, vamos ver esse pedido não ser atendido? :-)
PS A frase mais divertida pelo cinismo do Marcelo foi que alguém precisava internvir numa situação quente fora de controle. VC conhece alguma situação quente e fora de controle de alguém falando sozinho consigo mesmo? hahaha Será que eles acham que na wikipedia só tem retardado?
Esse é um dos problemas de ter relações com outros editores em outros mecanismo de conversa como esses negocios de MSN e chats. Cria laços que depois impedem julgamentos imparciais sobre situações. Como eu por exemplo, não vou a esses nerd-encontros, não trato nem tenho relação com qualquer editor fora do univrso virtual estritamemnte dentro do universo Wiimedia, sou um 'outsider' e não me interessa qum assina o que. Non-grata. hehe E poucos são assim. MachoCarioca (talk) 01:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Valeu, mas não precisava esrever nada sobre imparcialidade lá não. bobeira, os que estão sempre lá, podem errar, mas não são cafajestes. O proprio FIRB, que vivia lá, fazia suas cagadas mas nunca foi um editor mal intencionado nem de curriola. Isso só atiça, e a questão do meu bloqueio não tem nada a ver com 'pressa', é com má fé e vingança obviamente, está claro pra todos lá, até pra turma do Indech, que é capaz de dar os argumentos mais indecente e cinicos do mundo pra justificar aquilo. Tem um lá que é 'mestre' nisso desde a epoca dos pedidos de desnomeação do Warp, preciso dizer quem é? . :-). MachoCarioca (talk) 01:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
O meu pedido do bloqueio não foi do Marcelo, ele apenas atiçou o cumplice contra mim (eu discutia sozinho, claro :-) ) - veja que o outros o ignoraram pois viram a coisa toda e conhecem muito bem Fred Xavier - que ocorreu a atende-lo. Podes retirar a frase?
Também peço imparcialidade para lidar com o caso. Já que o do Marcelo foi atendido bem antes que os outros e tem o do Nuno ali em aberto até hoje, esse tb deve ser prioridade que nem o pedido feito pelo FX.
Deixa só pedido pra gente ver. :-) MachoCarioca (talk) 02:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
PS Posso te ser sincero? Estou torcendo pra que não atendam, pois se assim for na volta vou poder chamar o Tummus de tudo e quero ver quem vai me bloquear. Jurisprudencia, certo? :-)
A questão não é essa Mizu, é pior. A cara de pau e a pouca vergonha foi muito maior, não foi apenas atender a nada, foi, numa discussao, bloquear apenas o desafeto ! Só entrou ali pra isso, eu fiz uma lista das edições dele ali, esse cara nunca bloqueou qualquer editor registrado conhecido da Wikipedia, foi ali só pra me pegar. rs MachoCarioca (talk) 02:43, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Mizu:Mas o tipo de amizade que constroem ali na Wiki é prejudicial, põem a amizade acima do projeto
Pois o problema todo está ai, não serve. E nem é amizade, basta alguem puxar o saco do outro ali, concordar sempre com as mesmas sposições ou eleger os mesmos desafetos, que passa a ter 'salvo conduto ' para suas ações de determinados adms sem carater. MachoCarioca (talk) 02:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Mais favor a um preso condenado hehe
Mizu, estou lendo lá na discussão do URC, bem no fim, uma afirmação com a costumeira empáfia do Nuno:
'o que tem tudo a ver com o atestado de incompetência que passei ao redactor da actual proposta'
Pode perguntar lá na discussão onde esta este 'atestado de incompetencia' que ele me passou ou escreveu que não li? Pra que eu possa responder. (pq na verdade tenho me abstido de discutir ali, a coisa volta sempre pro mesmo lugar, é uma lenga lenga infindavel), o que interessa é a contagem de votos, o resto é opinião. MachoCarioca (talk) 02:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Mizu, não poe link pra cá, senão começa aquela chacrinha de novo, de todo mundo vir aqui me ler. Pode colocar apenas que é um pedido meu a vc, colocado ali? Ele responde lá mesmo. MachoCarioca (talk) 02:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Mas isso é exceção, e veja que FIRb e Gustavo são editores novo ali, eu falo é desse cancer do circulo de imunidade e coleguismo conjunto dos atigos. O que mais dá nojo é ver o comportamento dos caras quando a coisa é com um ou com outro. As justificativas imundas que dão pra livrar a cara dos cumpadres, cagando pra isenção do projeto, preocupados apenas com o circulo de amigos. É repugnante ler o Marcelo reclamando das justificativas dadas por alguns que apoiaram oa desnoemação, com a cara de pau de omitir as justificativas absurdas e nada a ver com o assunto de varios que votaram contra. Eu acho o seguinte, numa situação dessas a gente fica calado. O cara ainda faz questão te tratar os outros como imbecis, como se ninguem tivesse vendo o que acontece.
Péra ai que tenho mais uma coisa pra vc postar por mim. MachoCarioca (talk) 03:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Post
Pode postar isso aí embaixo aqui [2]?
Caro Bonás, me permita contrapor meu raciocínio ao seu. A primeira coisa que tem chamado à atenção de um tempos pra cá, é o empenho de administradores da Wikipedia em tentar invalidar propostas de votação em que por alguma razão se acreditem ameaçados ou a seus pontos de vista. Estes admnistradores e seus mais conhecidos puxa-sacos (futuros administradores, pois apenas esses alinhados ao espírito de corpo se elegem) não apenas se conformam em argumentar, apresentar idéias ou mesmo a votar contra as propostas, mas tem sempre a pretensão de evitá-las, impedi-las de serem apreciadas pela comunidade, alinhavando os mais diversos argumentos para isso. Estranho isso. Ou nada estranho.
Mas a questão aqui, é contrapor seu raciocínio com outro. Diz vc ser esta proposta (que há muito vem sendo discutida nesta comunidade, nunca havendo consenso e nunca tendo sido efetivamente levada a uma votação, para se definir a questão (o que é mais do que legitimo) apenas uma ‘retaliação’ ao ‘bloqueio do MC’. Bom, subentendo o seguinte: a frase pressupõe um certo receio de que, de alguma maneira, o meu bloqueio não tenha sido ‘engolido’ pela comunidade, podendo assim esta votação, significar alguma ameaça a administradores como Indech, Mschlindwein e caterva, certo? Pois, se não há nenhuma dúvida de que a comunidade aprova tudo que o adm Indech e Mschlindwein tem feito, não sei porque esta votação seria alguma ameaça ao cargo tão prezado por eles, concorda?
Também quanto ao fato desta votação ser considerada algum tipo de retaliação a algo, eu poderia contra argumentar que a votação sobre a mudança dos requisitos para direito ao voto também seja uma retaliação contra a votação da comunidade na proposta do URC. Afinal, ela surgiu também assim ‘de repente’. E. obviamente, naquela votação, não apareceu nem aparecerá qualquer adm pedindo pra arquivá-la e negarão qualquer ligação de uma coisa com outra, mesmo sendo ela a mais óbvia sobre isso - essa tem prova - pois provém de um inconformismo do adm Rei Artur, explicito em seu blog pessoal, pelo resultado da votação majoritária a favor do URC. Faz sentido o meu raciocínio?
PS Ou seja, opiniões individuais não querem dizer nada, estas coisas sempre tem que ser resolvidas mesmo é pela comunidade, no voto. E afinal, as coisas sempre surgem provocadas por algum fato, não?
Assina vc, por mim.
O Mizu, vc colocou minha assinatura lá, vão achar que furei o bloqueio. MachoCarioca (talk) 03:30, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Quero deixar claro o seguinte, não furei bloqueio nenhum e não furo bloqueio da Wikipedia. Pedi ao Mizu para postar por mim - como muito qdo estão bloqueados pedem a outros por e-mail para postarem por eles, são atendido, fica explicito que é a pedido, todo mundo vê e não tem problema. No meu caso, não uso e-mail, por isso pedi a ele por aqui. Eu não sei porque ele colocou minha assinatura, disse que era um link, pode ser visto no historico da pagina em questão que eu não entrei ali. Inclusive perguntei a ele aaqui em cima porque ele colocou minha assinatura. Qualquer aumento do meu bloqueio por isso, que o Nuno ameaça fazer, é ilegal, foge às regras e é questão pessoal. Sds MachoCarioca (talk) 03:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Ele voltou atrás, foi avisado do engano pelo Fabiano. Esse cara sempre foi assim atabalhoado e truculento com o botão. Não analisa nada. Mas de bom tem o fato de que se acha que pode ter feito uma cagada, volta atrás. MachoCarioca (talk) 04:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Com relação ao que postou da Nice lá na minha discussão, na verdade eu nem votei ali, deixei a coisa correr e fiquei lendo. Eu nunca vi a Nice exatamente como administradora, sempre a vi como editora. As funções são diferentes, ser bom num, não significa ser bom noutro. Na verdade ela, a exceção de usar ferramentas para bloqueios de pagina, nunca teve muito a ver com administração, o barato dela sempre foi editar, sempre foi dedicada a isso. Acho que ela é muito mais feliz lá só editando, é o que gosta de fazer. Não devia ter sido adm mesmo. E ela sumiu, depois de passar a zanga volta. Vc já notou que todo esse pessoal que perde o botão some? Parece que ser da Wikipedia sem ser adm não interessa, ja notou? A unica exceção que notei, de adms desnomeados ou desprestigiados foi o FIRB, outro que sempre tbém curtiu e curte mais es edições, está sempre trabalhando nos esportes. Palmas pra ele, não se importou com a coisa e continua lá trabalhando e participando normalmente. Tbém acho que não dava pra adm, mas esse tem realmente espirito wikipedista. MachoCarioca (talk) 15:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
PS Eu tenho uma opinião muito particular sobre administraodres da Wikipedia: todo adm que faça muita questão de se-lo e tenha ataques e mova ceus e terra pra não ser desnomeado ou coisa que o valha, não devia se-lo. Não serve pro projeto.
Bloqueio
O Fabiano bloqueou o Tummus (12 horas?? Só??). Esse é um cara que acho que tem agido ali como adm de, goste-se dele ou não, simpatize-se com ele ou não. Ele tbém nem está aí pra isso, o que é otimo. Sabia que o Nuno estava on line o tempo todo e ignorou? hahahaha MachoCarioca (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Fabiano, se vc me ler aqui, solicito que fale com o Nuno pra desbloquear tbém o ID do bloqueio do Mizu, senão não adianta. Sempre se esquecem disso qdo desbloqueaim antes do prazo. MachoCarioca (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Descompactação
Mizu, podes descompactar essa minha conversa neste tópico [3] desta discussão, covardemente compactada por um editor que se aproveita do fato de eu estar impedido de editar ali no momento e depois de ter sido avisado que não compactasse minhas intervenções? Grato. MachoCarioca (talk) 08:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Mais um favor, pode retirar a ultima msg do Darwin no fim da minha pagina de discussão? Não quero nada dele lá, o cara não tem mesmo vergonha do que diz e faz. MachoCarioca (talk) 12:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Mizu, podes retirar de novo que o Darwn voltou a colocar? Eu não quero esconder ou mostrar nada, eu não quero é msg do Darwin na minha pagina e quem resolve o que fica nela sou eu e não ele, ele vá escrever na Esplanada ou na pagina dele. Pode retirar e pedir ao Lech pra bloquea-la? MachoCarioca (talk) 14:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Pode recolocar o que o Darwin mais uma vez entrou ali pra tirar? (aquilo foi escrito por mim) Na minha pagina edito eu e o Darwin não dá ordens a ninguém, o cara tá se achando o dono da Wikipedia de tanta asinha que deram, vai cair do cavalo já já. Eu estou justamente sem poder escrever ali por causa do que eu escrevi, já estou sendo punido com o fechamento do canal. Retire apenas o 'puta que pariu' que está feio e não é meu estilo, eu estava de cabeça quente com o absurdo feito na cara de todo mundo. (tu esqueceu do meu primeiro pedido lá em cima :-)
E deixe todo o resto. Aí sim, peça ao Lech pra bloquear minha página, pode ser? MachoCarioca (talk) 14:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Mizu faz um favor, em vez de deixar msg ali que sabe-se lá quando e quem vai atender aquilo, pede direto ao Daimore na pagina dele, que ele está on line? MachoCarioca (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Bem-vindo ao clube! hahaha O Clube dos Bloqueados! haha Sabe o que é mais engraçado? O pessoal entra ali no teu bloqueio e no meu e fala que é injusto, que foi retaliação comigo, má fe´com vc e comigo, que eu não podia ser bloqueado sozinho e coisa e tal, falam e falam . E fazem o que? Nada. Continuamos bloqueados hahaaha
Welcome to the Club! MachoCarioca (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Realmente é um pé no saco, deixo essa burocracia medonha pra esses cara-craxá que adoram isso, meu negocio é criar. Eu conheço o Helper, mas por algum motivo ele não funciona direito comigo. Tem um que transporta direto da Wiki-en pro Commons mas não aceita o navegador Explorer, é brincadeira? Assim não dá, tenho sempre que fazer do modo mais dificil. MachoCarioca (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Olá Mizu, poderia ver o que pode fazer por esta imagem estão querendo apagar, a primeira edição fui eu que carreguei, agora estão exigindo uma autorização para uso comercial que porcaria é essa. O site onde está a foto no final da página diz que as fotos são livres para qualquer tipo de uso, só precisa citar o site. O rapaz que carregou a segunda edição melhorada me escreveu pedindo ajuda, ver minha discussão, mas não sei como ajudar. Um abraço Jurema Oliveira (talk) 08:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Obrigado Mizu, não posso te responder lá na WP porque fui bloqueada 2 dias. Estão dizendo que xinguei a mãe do Rafa. haha Jurema Oliveira (talk) 18:12, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Mizu, já posso entrar para o clube dos bloqueados? Jurema Oliveira (talk) 18:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Mas eu não xinguei de fdp e nem mandei pra pqp eu só disse que não era a mãe dele pra dizer mentiras deslavadas isso é xingar? hehe Jurema Oliveira (talk) 19:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Obrigado Mizu. Um abraço Jurema Oliveira (talk) 20:57, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Rocco_Siffredi_2.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Rocco_Siffredi_2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rocco_Siffredi_2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
GeorgHH • talk 18:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Ubisoft permission
Regarding File:Sam-fisher-conviction-1.jpg. Firstly, I did not notice you were the one who put {{Attribution-Ubisoft}} before I tagged for Copyvio ; otherwise I would have discussed it with you before.
About your statement « Ubisoft lets us use any screenshot from their games. It didn't say we must create our own screenshots. I took of the permission tag and put the right license », you may want to read Commons:Deletion requests/File:El Guerrero.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PoP2008 Environment Bright.jpg. Jean-Fred (talk) 11:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Mizu, fiz um pedido aqui dá uma olhada lá. Um abraço
![]() |
File:Tickle me elmo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Kungfuman (talk) 12:10, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:PEGI white violence tag.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jappalang (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:PEGI white fear tag.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jappalang (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:PEGI white discrimination tag.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jappalang (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:PEGIgambling.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jappalang (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:PEGIdrogas.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jappalang (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:PEGI white drugs tag.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jappalang (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:PEGI white gambling tag.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|