User talk:Tonyjeff

This user started a journey seeking for illumination.

Bandeira do Brasil

Caro Tonyjeff,

Você anulou minha edição do verbete Bandeira do Brasil baseado apenas em sua opinião pessoal sobre o que o verbete deve incluir ou não. Com essa atitude, quem está fazendo guerra de edições e vandalismo é você e não eu. Não se esqueça que Você não é dono do verbete !

Seu comentário sobre minhas alterações mostra que você nem sequer leu as legendas das imagens que lá coloquei. Não coloquei nenhuma bandeira de uma suposta "Cia. das Índias (que usava a mesma em todos os territórios ocupados)." Inclusive, se tivesse lido o verbete Você iria reparar que todas as bandeiras que coloquei aparecem referidas no texto (são ilustrações do texto, com o objetivo de enriquecer o verbete).

Ao contrário de sua opinião meramente pessoal, todas as bandeiras que coloquei estão diretamente ligadas à história da Bandeira do Brasil, algumas delas estando na origem de elementos que formam a atual Bandeira Brasileira. Esse grupo de bandeiras não é apenas mera uma evolução da bandeira portuguesa, incluindo também outras bandeiras históricas do Brasil como as usadas pelos holandeses ou a usada na revolução pernambucana. Assim, está perfeitamente justificada a sua inclusão na seção História do verbete Bandeira do Brasil.

Agradeço, portanto, que não volte a anular minhas edições bem intencionadas e justificadas e que não continue tendo uma atitude contrária à do espírito da Wikipedia. 13h21min de 7 de março de 2012 (UTC)

Caro, como está bem claro na introdução do verbete, aquele artigo refere-se às bandeiras do Brasil propriamente ditas, não às bandeiras dos reis portugueses, nem à bandeira marítima de Portugal, nem à bandeira da Cia. das Índias (que usava a mesma em todos os territórios ocupados). Você colocou em terceiro plano aquilo que é o objeto de estudo desse artigo: a evolução da bandeira do Brasil. Preferiu entupir o verbete com todo e qualquer estandarte por lá tremulado em seus 500 anos de história.

Afirmo que já há verbete adequado para a bandeira portuguesa e toda sua evolução, incluindo suas bandeiras navais, obviamente todas elas estendidas sobre os territórios ocupados pelo império português. Nada disso interessa ao verbete em questão, havendo, porém, as devidas indicações para quem quiser saber mais a respeito.

Suas alterações, unilaterais, afetam a proposta do artigo e, ante resistência, devem ser discutidas na aba de discussão. A guerra de edições é considerada vandalismo e, se persistir, serei obrigado a pedir a interveniência de um administrador. tony :: jeff ¿ 21h18min de 6 de março de 2012 (UTC)

Hello

I see that you had to eliminate the images, but they have been approved for use in otrs, whats the motive for this? ---- @lestaty ^discuţie 03:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Answered here [1] ---- @lestaty ^discuţie 04:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

bandeira do Império está errada,coroa não é daquele jeito e fita que une os ramos é verde e amrelo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.1.125.73 (talk • contribs) Tonyjeff (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC) (UTC)

Por acaso já viu o projeto original de Debret? Se por acaso se refere à bandeira utilizada atualmente nos sites de monarquistas, com coroa de rei com almofada verde e laço auriverde, deveria ler um pouco mais os livros. Veja também a bandeira que está no Museu de História Nacional, no Rio de Janeiro. A coroa é de imperador, com almofada vermelha, e laço vermelho. Tonyjeff (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

"de minimis"

Hi Tonyjeff;

I'm sorry to have been so slow responding that the thread at COM:AN has been archived. To answer your question, "de minimis" is frequently mentioned in deletion discussions. Please invoke Google with the following search string: site:commons.wikimedia.org "deletion requests" "de minimis" [2] Walter Siegmund (talk) 00:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Farc

You dont know to read?. As say in the descriprtion I made the image, the first image of Farc-ep ever seen. I can't violate the copyright of muy own work. Or perhaps you can confuse the people for move my copyright rights in favor to the authentic violators?. This image was first published in 1998 in a catalan magazime and in Internet about 2000; later images take from my work are the violations that you seems now to protect against the true author. I stoped many time ago to load images in commons because here there's a lot of people like you that want to made merits destroying the good and original images, and even sometimes imposing bad images generally violations of copyrights. Now I only load images that I licensed before, or some image that i need specially for my articles; and my phographic database of about 450.000 photos (i.e. 16.000 photos I take in India; 12.000 in Ceiland and Maldives; 8.0000 in Gambia, etc...) that I was planing to give to Commons, was stored and never will be licensed due to evil people that usurped the direction and administration of commons. If you need contact me you can find me in catalan wikipedia user:jolle. --jolle (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

You are wrong:

• 1) Farc is now a terrorist organization ¿Where they have registered their flag, logo or my drawing?
• 2) Logo of the Farc, according its own documentation, can be reproduced freely worldwide (in fact this is that they want). Some countries can persecute the artist under accusation to cooperate with terrorist organizations, but no one for violation of an innexistent copyright.
• 3) According international law the flags are no object of copyright neither its elements when interpreted by artists. Can be discussed that happen if the logo is used by other organizations, but seems that being a terrorist organization, even this can be made.

4) All papers ands magazimes in Colombia are fill of the logo. The flag photo is reproduced many times.

• 4) I have registered my image in the corresponding departament of the Generalitat de Catalunya. Also the image is stored in the regional archive. No similar image was obtained in the basa data of international registered images, and if exist is later that the mine and never should be copyrighted without my permission.

Seems that you are trying to find any justification to your unmeditated action, but that the logo is copyrighted is not a good option: is too many evident that it is not. Your insults and menaces are tipical; I can't forbidden you to use this tactics, as they are the common in commons. Your work in commons seems to be poor, specially confronting wit your menaces as if you was the great boss; please moderation.--83.33.217.11 17:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

caravelas

Prezado, a imagem de Caravelas foi carregada daquele modo para uso em pt:período regencial; ao carregar uma "nova" versão, simplesmente quebrou o uso ao qual estava destinado. Em muitos casos, fiz novos carregamentos com a imagem completa, que se presta para outros usos. Talvez possa fazer o mesmo... Por favor, olhe o verbete indicado - qualquer alteração aqui tem efeito lá.

Abraços, André Koehne ^{TALK TO ME} 09:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Presidential. flag of Brazil

I'm sorry, but you are wrong. I have an actual photo of the flag, and the colours are based directly off of it.Therefore I am changing it back. HERE is the photo. Fry1989 (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Can you please show me these laws and official files? Fry1989 (talk) 23:29, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

You need to give me some proof, such as a link to the official files, otherwise it's only your word, where-as I have an actual photo of the flag. Please give me proof. Fry1989 (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes, you do need to give some proof. When the appearance of a file is in question, and one person has evidence of it being one way, you can't just claim that person is wrong, you have to prove them wrong. I'm willing to wait until you can find official documents, and I wish you the best of luck if you choose to(as I tried and couldn't find any), but you can't just say I'm wrong and expect me to accept that. Fry1989 (talk) 00:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

You don't seem to understand something very clear. I have a photo of the flag. My changes are not "personal tastes", they are directly derived from the photo. I searched a very long time for official documents regarding the flag and arms, on embassy websites, government portals, and to no avail. Unless my changes can be proven wrong, there is no reason for you to revert them. Did you know that even the Government of Brazil isn't exact with their Arms? Compare this to this to this. Two show it darker blue, and one with light blue, and other noticable differences. I have no lack of faith in th eoriginal uploader getting it from a Government website, but since that source no longer exists, we have no way of reviewing the Arms. You simply can't just accuse me of making preferential changes when I actually use sources. This isn't about preference, this is about reality, and a photo is reality. Fry1989 (talk) 01:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

For the record, I've checked the blazon, and it does not mention such things as the strokes that you are insistant upon. It only mentions the elements of the Arms. Here is the text.

""The National Arms were instituted by Decree No. 4 of 19 November 1889, with alteration made by Law No. 5443 of 28 May 1968 (Annex No. 8) The making of the National Arms should conform to the proportions of 15 units of height by 14 of width and take into account the following provisions: I - The round shield will be composed of a sky-blue [azul-celeste] field containing five silver [prata] stars arranged in the form of the Southern Cross, with the bordure [bordura] of the field outlined in gold and charged with silver stars equal to the stars existing in the National Flag (Modification made by Law No. 8421 of 11 May 1972). II - The shield will be placed on a star parted gyronny of ten pieces, green [sinopla] and gold, bordered by two strips, the inner red [goles] and the outer gold. III - All placed on a sword in pale, pommelled gold, hilted blue [blau], except for the center part, which is red [goles] and contains a silver star, all upon a crown formed by a branch of coffee fruited on the dexter side and another of flowering tobacco on the sinister side, both in proper colors, tied blue [blau], the whole assembled on a splendor of gold, the contours of which form a star of 20 points. IV - On a blue [blau] scroll, placed over the pommel of the sword, inscribed in gold the legend República Federativa do Brasil in the center, and also the phrases 15 de Novembro on the dexter end and de 1889 on the sinister end."" Fry1989 (talk) 02:19, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Brazil flag

Ever thought about asking http://www.inmetro.gov.br/consumidor/produtos/bandeira.asp for color specifications. I believe we got them before from an old government website, but it seemed to have disappeared. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 19:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

I made a new comment in the discussion at File_talk:Flag_of_Brazil.svg#Upload_of_new_version, and as you are involved in it I'm notifying you in case you don't watch that page. TigerTjäder (talk) 13:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Flag of Brazil (dimensions).svg IS WRONG

The Flag of Brazil (dimensions).svg is wrong. The size of the star Alfa Sírio (in Cão Maior) is: Sírio (1), and the SVG flag is: Sírio (2). The correct size is Sírio (1). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chafis (talk • contribs)

making these flags

could you redo the flags of holy britannian empire and helgan empire in high quality-svg files,and post them in fictional flags? please thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.239.11.239 (talk • contribs) Tonyjeff (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC) (UTC)

Hi, I was not able to understand you very well; could you please show me the files? Cheers. Tonyjeff (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

http://codegeass.wikia.com/wiki/File:Britannian_flag.svg could you remake one of these flags and post them in fictional flags section? http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/fic%5Egeas.html here are two links to the same flag only in different proportions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.239.11.239 (talk • contribs) Tonyjeff (talk) 13:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC) (UTC)

I see – sorry, I do not think I will be able to dedicate some time to this project; if things change I post a message at the discussion tag of the file. Cheers. Tonyjeff (talk) 13:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Coat of arms of Belgium

Dear Tonyjeff, could you please check the concerns related to this file File:Coats of arms of Belgium Government.svg which were provided on the FARC process with respect to Belgium. Thank you very much. Vb 89.0.164.177 12:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

the flag

hi! its me again and about that flag request,are you available for making it yet? if not can you direct me to anyone on wikipedia who can? thanks

flag

hello! its me again,are you able to make the HBE flag i requested earlier more specifically this one http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080523024136/uncyclopedia/images/archive/2/22/20080706023254!Flag_of_The_Holy_Empire_of_Britannia.gif77.239.11.239 18:27, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

CMYK for the Acores flag

Hello would it be possible or would you even know what the C__ M__ Y__ K__ settings would be for the blue section of the Acores flag. You can email me at fernando_demenezes@rogers.com.

Libyan Coat of Arms Font

Greetings,

You're credited as the author of File:Coat of arms of Libya-1970.svg. I'm wondering if you remember the name of the font used for the Arabic inscription. I know I've seen it before and was sure I had it on my computer, but I'll be darned if I can find it. I'm hoping you may be able to assist me.

Thanks! Mnmazur (talk)

No worries. Thanks for getting back to me! Mnmazur (talk)

Imagens do Museu Imperial

Onde você verificou o status como copyvio? A obra foi publicada pelo Limongi na Wikipedia anglófona e trazida por mim ao Commons. Você avisou o editor que a publicou originalmente? Pode também apresentar o link que indica copyvio? A sua justificativa é até o momento inválida, o fato das obras pertencerem ao Museu Imperial não significa que reproduções das peças sejam copyvio. Dornicke (talk) 18:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Como você não forneceu uma justificativa válida, reverti suas marcações. Dornicke (talk) 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Independência ou Morte.jpg

File:Independência ou Morte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lecen (talk) 02:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Visconde de Inhaúma

Me pergunto se você poderia criar o brasão do Visconde de Inhaúma. Seria possível? Um abraço, --Lecen (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Program used

Hello, I want to know wich software do you use to make this awesomes coat of arms?

thanks in advance!

Brasão Saxe-Coburgo-Bragança e Tasso de Bordonha e Valnigra

Prezado, notei que você produziu o brasão dos Saxe-Coburgo e Bragança que ilustra a Wikipédia. Gostaria de saber se você seria capaz de fazer também um brasão dos Tasso de Bordonha e Valnigra, com base nesta fonte (p. 32) e nesta também.

Obrigado!

Esfera do Brasil

Faça a alteração em sua imagem de vetor então. Kevinposed (talk)

coats of arms

Hello, I am interested in hiring an artist who knows heraldry. If you are interested, please contact me at coadb@mail.com.

Emblem of Comoros

Hello, Tonyjeff. You realized the design of the emblem of Comoros in 2007. Since that year, in 2016, the Union of Comoros adopted a new symbol changing the name of the country (in french and arabic) as well as the motto. Could you realize the new symbol for Wikimedia ? Thanks. --Cyril-83 (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Dúvida sobre o verde e o amarelo da bandeira imperial do Brasil

Caro Tonyjeff, na revisão de 2010 da bandeira atual do Brasil, o verde e o amarelo são os mesmos do vetor da bandeira imperial que você fez, porém, o Zscout370 alterou as cores de acordo com uma aproximação de pantone em 2011. Qual a certeza de que as cores estão precisas?

Prezado @Bobina da Wiki: , o arquivo por mim criado da bandeira imperial tem como base uma percepção das cores comumente encontradas nas reproduções dela. Já no caso da bandeira nacional atual do Brasil, o decreto que a oficializa não diz nada sobre as porcentagens de cada cor. Contudo, costuma-se usar como referência o que é disponibilizado no site do Governo. Não creio que essas porcentagens tenham qualquer caráter oficial; porém acho equivocado usar as cores por mim escolhidas para a bandeira imperial, pois esta costuma ter verde e amarelo mais escuros. Seria prudente perguntar ao citado usuário @Zscout370: quais as referências para ele ter procedido com tal alteração. At.te. Tonyjeff (talk) 17:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Lusignan coat of arms

Hi Tonyjeff I noticed that the Lusignan family have coat of arms that are not of excellent quality and certainly less beautiful than those you are capable of doing. could you make them more beautiful, as they usually come to you?

Of this you should, if you can of course, also make a version with the cardinal insignia for Hugues and Lancelot de Lusignan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.20.244 (talk) 14:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC) thank you

when you read this message could you let me know? I just need to write to me below that you have read it. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.20.244 (talk) 15:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.20.244 (talk)  

You are AAL

your gas Inn nnnn (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

about middle coat of arms of Belgium

Good afternoon Since you are the author of the image, I decided to write to you. The drawing is good, but it does not reflect reality. Below are links to the actually used image of the small coat of arms of Belgium. As you can see, it is different from what is posted. The image of the lion is different, the motto ribbon contains inscriptions in French and Dutch. The general view is different. If you have the opportunity to supplement or correct the image, I would be grateful. Sincerely! https://www.belgium.be/en/about_belgium/country/belgium_in_nutshell/symbols/coats_of_arms https://www.neversuchinnocence.com/embassy-of-belgium https://diplomatie.belgium.be/sites/default/files/styles/fluid_image/public/2022-05/shutterstock_1479185807_0.jpg?itok=8Wsst4C4 http://en.people.cn/90777/8335106.html Returntoedenblr (talk) 10:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)