Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 04 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Eckersdorf_OT_Schanz.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Aerial panorama of Schanz, part of the municipality of Eckersdorf, district Bayreuth, Germany --J. Lunau 12:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too high contrast (burned out highlights and too dark shadows) combined with  Level of detail too low --Augustgeyler 12:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you for your review. According to your first review with oppose I slightly reduced the noise and for me now the photo meets all given QI creteria, especially for an arial view it shows enough details. I would like to hear other opinions. --J. Lunau 17:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment So it was declined already. --August (talk) 07:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but too grainy, lack of detail, too dark shadows, burned out sky. A valuable picture for Commons but not a QI from technical point of view. --Plozessor 14:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --August (talk) 20:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Yak_in_Khövsgöl_04.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Yak near (Bos grunniens) Khatgal in Khövsgöl Province, Mongolia --Bgag 02:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry. Image is not sharp and overexposed. --Needsmoreritalin 02:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Should be better now. --Bgag 19:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose both versions oversharpened. --Smial 12:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Smial. --Plozessor 14:55, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --August (talk) 20:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-AMG_X254_43_IMG_9851.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mercedes-AMG X254 43 in Böblingen --Alexander-93 18:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Noisy at the front - fixable? --Mike Peel 09:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient DoF and chromatic aberration at the left tire. --Augustgeyler 22:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose disturbing background, and surrounding. --Smial 13:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --August (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Virgin_Mary_Queen_of_Poland_church_in_Znin_(1).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Virgin Mary Queen of Poland church in Znin, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voiv., Poland. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 07:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not upright --2015 Michael 2015 14:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Verticals are OK, I don't see any problems with this image. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I was above not clear, correct is: For me it looks like as it is leaning to the right, i.e. a "perfect" perspective correction is sometimes the wrong attempt. --2015 Michael 2015 09:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree with 2015 Michael 2015, the image is leaning a bit to the right. --C messier 20:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose A clear and sharp image. But the intense PC applied here led to an unrealistic impression of the dimensions. --Augustgeyler 08:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support --GoldenArtists 08:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --August (talk) 20:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)