Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 22 2023
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Paesens-Moddergat. Vissersmonument Moddergat (Fisherman Monument.) 1 of 5 parts.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Paesens-Moddergat. Vissersmonument Moddergat (Fisherman Monument.) 1 of 5 parts.
-
- Nomination Paesens-Moddergat. De Vissersvrouw / De Fiskersfrou (The Fisherwoman.)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Paesens-Moddergat. De Vissersvrouw / De Fiskersfrou (The Fisherwoman.)
-
- Nomination Buildings at 54, 56 and 58 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 04:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 52 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 04:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 13 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 04:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 34 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 04:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Missy-sur-Yonne, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 04:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 15th century German wooden statuette depicting the Madonna and Child, Musée de Cluny-Musée National du Moyen Âge, Paris --L'OrfeoGreco 03:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, composition OK, but for this kind of image the sharpness is too low. --XRay 04:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wzorowy Podchorąży Rezerwy bagde (brown) --Jacek Halicki 03:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Xiaomi temperature and humidity sensor --Jacek Halicki 03:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Butaprene glue --Jacek Halicki 03:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Butter dish --Jacek Halicki 03:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The main entrance to John F. Kennedy High School, Silver Spring, MD --Lorax 02:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Giles in Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Giles in Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apse of the Romanesque charnel house at the cemetery in Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Agnes and Saints Simon and Jude Thadeus in Faning, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the subsidiary church Saint Agnes and Saints Simon and Jude Thadeus in Faning, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination RestoBar Discotheque. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination University of Valparaiso. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination San Miguel Arcángel Parish, Marianist. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mural en Chile. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pterodactyl Ascender II. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cottonwood (Populus spp.) along Cave Creek. Saguaros (Carnegiea gigantea) on the hills. Jewel of the Creek, Arizona --Tagooty 00:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance, Abdul Nazir Sab State Institute of Rural Development & Panchayat Raj, Mysore, Karnataka --Tagooty 00:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Siddhartha Nagara Traffic Police Station, Mysore, Karnataka, India --Tagooty 00:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sign boards, Administrative Training Institute, ANSSIRD&PR, Mysore, Karnataka --Tagooty 00:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihar Marga, view to north, Mysore, Karnataka, India --Tagooty 00:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lille 124 126 128 av de bretagne (by Velvet) --Sebring12Hrs 20:29, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lille 74 rue de cassel (by Velvet) --Sebring12Hrs 20:29, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --多多123 21:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lille 40 rue turgot (by Velvet) --Sebring12Hrs 20:29, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2017 - Le palais du Luxembourg, dans le jardin du Luxembourg, Paris (by Lmbuga) --Sebring12Hrs 20:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Broadleaf Plantain Spike --sanjay_ach 18:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --多多123 18:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination B-Final Men at the 48th Hallorenpokal in diving in Halle (Saale) on 5 February 2023. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 18:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --痛 22:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination B-Final Men at the 48th Hallorenpokal in diving in Halle (Saale) on 5 February 2023. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 18:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --痛 22:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination B-Final Men at the 48th Hallorenpokal in diving in Halle (Saale) on 4 February 2023. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 18:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality and use of perspective. --多多123 18:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination WCI swag kit --Wasiul Bahar 17:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient DoF. --Tagooty 03:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination WCI swag kit --Wasiul Bahar 17:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient DoF, crop too tight. Underexposed. --Tagooty 03:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bentley Continental GTC Speed in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 14:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Washroom inside DB Premium Lounge, Berlin Hbf --MB-one 12:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former Let L-410 of CiTylinK on display at at Red Clay Studios near Tamale, Ghana --MB-one 12:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 12:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination MAN Lion’s Intercity LE in rail substitute service for Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund line RB15 --MB-one 12:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 12:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New apostolic church, a listed monument in Rendsburg --MB-one 12:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Too much uninteresting road in the foreground, but ok, I guess --Poco a poco 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-AMG C190 GT R in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 12:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lamborghini Urus S in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 12:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ineos Grenadier in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 12:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zebra sea bream (Diplodus cervinus), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 10:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sheephead bream (Diplodus puntazzo), Cablo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 10:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An Early Bumble Bee on a flower in the special protection area Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 10:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, displays natural exposure and good sense of lightness, also in accordance with the thirds. --多多123 15:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An Early Bumble Bee on a flower in the special protection area Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 10:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An Early Bumble Bee on a flower in the special protection area Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 10:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Une locomotive de la CBG à Kamsar. --Aboubacarkhoraa 09:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Crop too tight, lacking sharpness, rotated ccw. --Augustgeyler 10:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Un manifestant du FNDC en tenue du drapeau guinéen. --Aboubacarkhoraa 09:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Out of focus, bad crop.--Alexander-93 12:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Une activiste guinéenne. --Aboubacarkhoraa 09:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unnatural flash light exposure on the person's face, as well as no clear centring on the main focus of the image. --多多123 15:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vue de la façade du bâtiment du ministère de la Justice guinéen. --Aboubacarkhoraa 09:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too tight crop, intense
chromatic aberration, visible
perspective distortion and rotated cw. --Augustgeyler 10:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Citroen C15 firefighter (by Frederic.laurent39) --Kakoula10 08:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Front not sharp. Moreover it's a bad crop, but that could be fixed.--Alexander-93 12:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Beetle (1957) in front of UNESCO world heritage site Porta Nigra in Trier. --Palauenc05 08:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Very nice scene! --Augustgeyler 08:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination War memorial in Mistelbach near Bayereuth --Ermell 07:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The river Mistel at the Zeckenmühle in Mistelbach --Ermell 07:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Belvedere in the Parc Rural du Bois Leurent, in Roncq, France --Velvet 07:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Smart #1 in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 18:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --多多123 19:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Michael Archangel church. Krzyżowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 12:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz G 500 4×4² in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 11:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --多多123 17:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lamborghini Urus Performante in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 11:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --多多123 17:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Slough amberwing (Perithemis domitia) male --Charlesjsharp 10:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Great quality, FP? --多多123 17:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Une pirogue taxi sur le rio nunez à Boké.--Aboubacarkhoraa 09:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
needs more room at the bottom --Charlesjsharp 10:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Oppose
Not done needs to be uncropped at bottom. --多多123 17:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Des passager dans la pirogue taxi sur le rio nunez à Boké.--Aboubacarkhoraa 09:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --多多123 17:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Une vielle personne traversant appéreur sur un pont en boie à Taigbé dans la sous-préfecture de Kamsar .--Aboubacarkhoraa 09:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unfortunately blurred.--Alexander-93 12:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Une double vue des installations de l'usine de la Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinée (CBG) et du pont du tapis roulant du bauxite de Guinea Alumina Corporation (GAC).--Aboubacarkhoraa 09:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unfortunately blurred.--Alexander-93 12:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vue de l'usine de chauffage de séchage de bauxite de la compagnie des bauxites de Guinée.--Aboubacarkhoraa 09:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Nice composition, but
Level of detail too low.--Alexander-93 12:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sinja Valley by Chandpr --UnpetitproleX 09:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish house, Rue des Arts 1, in Roncq, France --Velvet 08:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open wing of Hypolimnas bolina (Linnaeus, 1758) – Great Eggfly. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --MaheshBaruahwildlife 07:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose head not in focus --Charlesjsharp 11:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Too dark to see clearly the body. --多多123 17:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kapitan Shitov in Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 07:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rechnoy-67 in Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 07:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rechnoy-67 in Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 07:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --多多123 17:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination TO-1004 in Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 07:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --多多123 19:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulpit of the Bartholomew Church in Glashütten --Ermell 06:15, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Could be a bit brighter. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Done Thank you for the review.--Ermell 21:13, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree in the Schellenbergmoor
--F. Riedelio 13:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC) - Decline
Oppose Sorry, but quite a strong blur in full resolution --Jakubhal 14:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Tree in the Schellenbergmoor
-
- Nomination Church Rechenberg in winter --Augustgeyler 21:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment At first glance I thought it was a night shot. But then I saw that the picture was taken shortly before 2 p.m. Isn't it very dark at this time, even in winter? -- Spurzem 10:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment The metadata say that this image was published under a CC-BY-NC-SA license. This seems to be the same in more of your images. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common basilisk (Basiliscus basiliscus) female --Charlesjsharp 08:34, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vue des chutes du Barrage de Kinkon --Aboubacarkhoraa 23:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp. --Augustgeyler 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 48 Strada Bărăției, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Good compostion but
Level of detail too low --Augustgeyler 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination F-4N Phantom at Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum --Mike Peel 20:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agricultural landscape near the wetland of the river Seret in Seretsky, Ternopil district. By User:Byrdyak --Augustgeyler 19:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Dramatic, but are those sky colors plausible for midday in June? -- Ikan Kekek 20:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I thought this could be plausible due to the weather. What do you think? --Augustgeyler 18:48, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Comment I think the clouds are very blue and the contrast may be overdone. -- Ikan Kekek 20:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you Ikan! I agree with you. This might not be a QI. --Augustgeyler 23:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Regnitz near the Wöhrmühle in Erlangen --Ermell 20:25, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Looks really blurred in the corners, is it fixable? --Vasmar1 20:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Cropped. Thanks for the review. --Ermell 21:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parade militaire à Kaloum en face de l'hôpital Ignace Deen --Aboubacarkhoraa 17:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Bad crop and out of focus. --Augustgeyler 23:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Une citene d'essence dans la ville de Mamou --Aboubacarkhoraa 23:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sancture traditionel sur l'ile de roome --Aboubacarkhoraa 23:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Défilé militaire à Conakry --Aboubacarkhoraa 23:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The front side of a Nokia XR20. By User:D-Kuru --Augustgeyler 20:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ladies to the toilet at the demonstration of May 1, 2023 in Saint-Etienne --Touam 19:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Grave of the Aviator General Gh. Negrescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Grave of the Păunescu and Rotaru Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: F-16 at Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum --Mike Peel 15:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Space Shuttle Enterprise at the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum --Mike Peel 15:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons) --Charlesjsharp 10:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review
Too many color artifacts (CA, chroma noise) --Poco a poco 14:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 3D model of a Sierpinski pyramid. (I nominate this file because version with higher iteration might be harder to view.) --PantheraLeo1359531 10:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mediterranean rainbow wrasse (Coris julis), Arrábida National Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Lutheran church. Jaworze, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 16:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry: Truncated steeple --F. Riedelio 07:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave of the Visarion Alexa Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mont Kinkili à Kindia.--Aboubacarkhoraa 17:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The image is not sharp enough and has
chromatic aberration at the trees. --Augustgeyler 23:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial panorama of Schanz, part of the municipality of Eckersdorf, district Bayreuth, Germany--J. Lunau 09:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Nice composition. But there is too much noise and too less detail. --Augustgeyler 08:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street sign of Conservatoire Street in Paris, France. --Chabe01 08:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Enercare Centre --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
The sign should be horizontal. --XRay 04:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the review, how's it now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Support Good quality. IMO OK. Thank you. --XRay 13:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality and centred correctly IMO. --多多123 16:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset from Ontario Place --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Geo location and category for the skyline missing. --XRay 04:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the review, Geo added but I'm not sure which skyline to add it as. It's one of the end parts of Toronto, but not the main part. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Support I've added a category. --XRay 13:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --多多123 16:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seattle Japanese Garden --Another Believer 14:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
This could be QI. But somthing needs to be done about the sky. There are burned out parts. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 19:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Oppose
Not done --Augustgeyler 21:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Augustgeyler, it needs some work on the sky and also there's another tree in the way of the main tree. --多多123 15:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sea slug (Doriopsilla pelseneeri), Arrábida National Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 06:59, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Can you reduce the noise a bit? Otherwise good. --MB-one 13:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Oppose
Not done, needs to be fixed. --多多123 15:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wysoka, aerial view --Cyku new 11:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
QI to me if you apply a perspective correction so that verticals of both sides are vertical --Poco a poco 16:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
but how? the sky is equally to the left and to the right --Cyku new 06:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Not sure what is the problem, you have to apply a cw tilt to get the houses in the middle straight and then apply a perspective correction so that verticals in both sides are vertical --Poco a poco 18:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately I don't know how to do that...--Cyku new 15:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Oppose Requires tilting, as per previous comments. --多多123 15:56, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Northern Blues on withered flower --FlocciNivis 20:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
too dark, not enough crop and id difficult to verify --Charlesjsharp 10:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Done I adjusted the brightness and cropped the image a bit more. But why do feel that the ID is difficult to verify? The other blue butterfly in this nature reserve is Polyommatus icarus and it is clearly not that one, if you look at the spots on the wing. --FlocciNivis 09:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
OK, P. argus is common across Germany but I guess not here --Charlesjsharp 09:48, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Support Good quality. May need further research into the species for better description (i.e. from an expert)? --多多123 15:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Black-and-purple_dancer_(Argia_oculata)_male_purple_form.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Black-and-purple dancer (Argia oculata) male purple form --Charlesjsharp 10:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Neutral
Basically a good composition, but resolution is too low.--Alexander-93 18:15, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
"Images should have at least 2 real megapixels of information". But it is above 2 MB, mea culpa. > Neutral.--Alexander-93 (talk) 12:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment Please read the image guidelines Alexander-93. You cannot decline for low resolution. Charlesjsharp 21:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Info Just as a point of order, it is perfectly within the Guidelines to decline because of what the reviewer considers a low resolution. I quote: "Images should have at least 2 real megapixels of information (with the exception of animations, videos, and SVGs), for example, 1600 × 1250. For "easy to take" images, reviewers may choose to demand more if the image would benefit from it.".--Peulle 19:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality, but I think people should be able to decline because they think the image is too small. I do that with photos of buildings and so on. -- Ikan Kekek 20:49, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Close_wing_basking_of_Rapala_pheretima_(Hewitson,_1863)_-_Copper_Flash_WLB.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Close wing basking of Rapala pheretima (Hewitson, 1863) - Copper Flash WLB --Anitava Roy 15:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose resized to 6000 x 4000 --Charlesjsharp 09:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --多多123 16:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:2022-05-21_50._Internationales_Dixieland_Festival_Dresden_1DX_1721_by_Stepro.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 50th International Dixieland Festival Dresden: Dresdner Jazzmeile, Moderator Bodo Gießner. By --Stepro 19:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Very good image. Could you please ad some information to the description about the location the man is speaking at. --Augustgeyler 19:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Dresdner Jazzmeile" is the location. There are 5 stages in a row, and this is one of them. --Stepro 21:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- As "Dresden Jazzmeile" is no permanent adress or a point anyone could find in a map, you should descripe where this stages are or just use a geocode. --Augustgeyler 00:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, but "Altstadt Dresden" is given in IPTC, and on which of the stages he is at this moment is absolutely unimportant. --Stepro 14:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Question Why do you think this is unimportant? --Augustgeyler 23:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is a portrait of a man with a microphone. I see no additional value to know, if this portrait is on stage 1, stage 2, .. or stage 5. The portrait of this man is on all those the same. --Stepro 11:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose OK. I do not agree. I think the QI guidelines are telling something different. There should be a description of the location which is precise enough to tell someone who does not know where this festival is held in Dresden, where this picture was taken. Otherwise there should be a geolocation. --Augustgeyler 18:46, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment I find the reason so pointless that I would like to put it up for discussion. --Stepro 22:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Support. Very good photo. Since nothing can be seen of the place where it was taken, the place does not have to be described. What is the point of this requirement? -- Spurzem 15:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Support. Same rationale, no specific address would be required in my opinion. -- 多多123 15:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Support The location information is totally adequate. -- Ikan Kekek 20:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Pfauenfeder_Detail-20230511-RM-163536.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Detail of a peacock feather --Ermell 08:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment crop is too tight for me --Charlesjsharp 10:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment Unfortunately, there is no more space on the left side. I have adjusted the crop. --Ermell 21:12, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Can you have another go! --Charlesjsharp 09:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Kind of too big for the focus, but the crops are perfectly OK, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Seattle_in_May_2023_-_029.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Seattle Japanese Garden --Another Believer 14:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Good composition. I am very sorry, but I have to oppose again. This image was
Overprocessed. Intense oversharpening and noise reduction led to nearly texture free surfaces on leaves and stones. At the same time most edges are unrealistically intensified. --Augustgeyler 20:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Support I can understand Augustgeyler's analysis and I see the same over-optimizations, but I still come to a different assessment, because with this image a decent print in A4 size is still possible without disturbing artifacts. --Smial 10:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality for me. -- Spurzem 10:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Support QI for me also --Halavar 12:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose The Japanese maple on the right looks bad to me. Few of the leaves have good details. -- Ikan Kekek 21:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Per Ikan --Jakubhal 04:51, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Insufficient detail in the leaves. --Tagooty 04:17, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Augustgeyler 21:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)
File:Biserica_de_lemn_„Cuvioasa_Paraschiva”_din_Sat-Șugatag_-_(2023)_-_IMG_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Wooden Church "Saint Paraskeva" of Sat-Șugatag --Chainwit. 16:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp enough and
Level of detail too low. Typical issues to smartphone pictures. --Halavar 18:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Support. I think that it is charp enough. We should not overdo. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 20:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose With Halavar. --Augustgeyler 07:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak
Support. Some detail loss in very dark areas, otherwise good enough. --Smial 10:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 06:23, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Support IMHO good enough for QI. --F. Riedelio 09:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Sky is posterized and does it have CA? -- Ikan Kekek 21:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Per Ikan --Jakubhal 17:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Per others.--Ermell 21:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 21:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Seattle_in_May_2023_-_041.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Seattle Japanese Garden --Another Believer 13:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry, but rather low level of detail and slight oversharpening. Let's discuss. --LexKurochkin 09:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Support I can't see the two ladybugs on the meadow either, but the picture is still good. We shouldn't overdo it with the requirements. -- Spurzem 08:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Support Good enough quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:20, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose The description is insufficient: "Seattle in May 2023" is way to vague. A statement about this park / garden is missing as well as about the shown sculpture. On the other hand here is also no geocode. The sculpture has some
perspective distortion. Additionally the level of detail is very low. --August Geyler (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Augustgeyler: You could say it's none of my business. Nevertheless I ask if you're not overdoing it. Or what is the reason for basically declaring the photos of a certain user unusable? Best regards -- Spurzem 13:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment I am sorry, but I do not agree on your point. I try very hard to review as detailed as possible. If supports or opposes aggregate at certain types of images or on nominators it just can happen due to reoccurring characteristics of those images in question. --Augustgeyler 15:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment @Spurzem: do you judge photo by photo, or have you decided to defend a certain user's pictures? IMO, this picture has a low level of detail. Promoting it would be unfair to others whose much technically superior photos have been rejected previously --Jakubhal 04:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment The problem is not with user, but with smartphone JPEGs. Yes, with good lighting and some luck there is a small chance to make QI-compliant photo, but 97% (my personal estimation) of smartphone JPEGs, including ones from modern sophisticated smartphones, are not in compliance with the Guidelines and the problems mostly are the same: low level of detail (due to small primitive lens and small sensor) and overprocessing (to compensate the problems of lens and sensor). It works for many purposes, many people not really focused on photography are happy with smartphone JPEGs, there is nothing wrong in uploading smartphone JPEGs to Wikimedia Commons, but QIC is a bit different, it is about technical excellence and skills in photography, so, getting QI is not impossible, but very difficult with a smartphone. And it is so for everyone. --LexKurochkin 15:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Augustgeyler: You could say it's none of my business. Nevertheless I ask if you're not overdoing it. Or what is the reason for basically declaring the photos of a certain user unusable? Best regards -- Spurzem 13:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Low level of detail --Jakubhal 04:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo LexKurochkin, Jakubhal and Augustgeyler, the technical excellence actually seems to be the only criterion for the evaluation as a quality image. If the sharpness is right and the lines of a building are absolutely vertical - even if they appear unnatural - then the picture is excellent. What else it looks like doesn't matter. Significant parts of the image may sink into shadows, the crop may be much too narrow, and what is happening in the background is completely irrelevant. In short: Good image design is irrelevant for QI, the image just has to be absolutely sharp. Did I understand that correctly? Best regards -- Spurzem 11:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Spurzem: The overprocessing is especially visible on the road and leaves. They are washed out of texture and look artificial, like a part of a bad painting. To a certain degree, almost all mobile phone pictures have this problem. However, I tend not to vote if the problem is not glaring. In the case of this picture, the problem is very visible to me, so I vote against it. I don't mind different opinions, however. If there are more votes in favor, let it be a QI. But, I don't like that you attribute ill intentions to other people, presenting it as "this user is against that user." Please don't. --Jakubhal 12:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Info @Spurzem: No, the Image guidelines are not that simple. There are many requirements for a QI, including low noise, good exposure, right white balance, absence of visible CA, etc. And we see many opposing votes on grounds of CA, overprocessing, big blown-out areas, noise. Too tight crop and other composition questions frequently create discussions. --LexKurochkin 13:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo LexKurochkin, Jakubhal and Augustgeyler, the technical excellence actually seems to be the only criterion for the evaluation as a quality image. If the sharpness is right and the lines of a building are absolutely vertical - even if they appear unnatural - then the picture is excellent. What else it looks like doesn't matter. Significant parts of the image may sink into shadows, the crop may be much too narrow, and what is happening in the background is completely irrelevant. In short: Good image design is irrelevant for QI, the image just has to be absolutely sharp. Did I understand that correctly? Best regards -- Spurzem 11:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with others. --Tagooty 04:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 21:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)