This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
How to contact a user that doesn't seem to have a talk page
Hello friends,
I want to contact user Jamieart Jnr. I understand that I would find the corresponding email address at the bottom left section of the talk page. But when I click on the user name, I'm taken to a page that says that this particular user doesn't have a talk page, so no email (or "email user" link) is shown. Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BerbarEl (talk • contribs) 16:48, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello BerbarEl. There is User talk:Jamieart Jnr where you can leave a message. What you saw was most likely the notice that this user does not have "user page" which is something else. User pages like User:Jamieart Jnr can be used to show your contributions to Commons and other Wikimedia projects. De728631 (talk) 17:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
(cross-posted) @BerbarEl: Having an email link and having already started a talk page are completely independent of one another.
At User talk:Jamieart Jnr (which does exist), assuming that you have provided your email address to Commons, then in the left nav there should be a link, "Email this user". Let me know if that is not there for you. - Jmabel ! talk17:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes. Once I confirmed my email address, the "Email user" link showed up. I was able to send my email. Thank you. BerbarEl (talk) 17:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
I first move the category "Praia dos Pescadores" to "Praia dos Pescadores, Ericeira" (because there are at least 2 other beaches with the same name), but, by error, because thinking that this move was not done, I duplicate the move and create the category "Praia dos Pescadores (Ericeira)". Now, is necessary to delete "Praia dos Pescadores, Ericeira", wich I appreciate someone do. Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 07:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
I've tried to upload a jpeg but the image orients incorrectly in preview
Not overly experienced with image upload but have never had this occur. Uploaded one file with zero problems tonight; next file lays on its side in preview. Three times it occurred, once after a restart of the browser. Chose NOT to upload the file for now. Looked in help but couldn't find the answer. Should I just upload it and fix the orientation afterwards? Would this conversation be better informed if I'd already performed the upload? BusterD (talk) 02:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
upload regardless the orientation of the previews. after successful uploads, if they show up wrong on the file page, use {{Rotate}}.
i dont know exactly what's behind the preview etc. all i know is that some cameras have sensors and can detect and set an orientation, which might be recognised by commons.--RZuo (talk) 09:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Can you help me please?
I have researched an ancient monument in Wales called Garn Goch for 5 years.
I have established a not for profit charity.
I have created a website and written a 150 page book.
I have the support of archaeological trusts.
I have produced a deeply researched and referenced summary specifically for Wikipedia.
Last year I amended the existing (and brief) Y Garn Goch page.
All my additions were unilaterally and totally removed.
In January I created a new page, Garn Goch, so as not to touch the existing page.
I uploaded the deeply researched and referenced summary specifically for Wikipedia.
It was unilaterally and totally removed.
This seems to me to be nothing but intellectual vandalism.
I do not know who is doing it, or why.
Nor do I know how to engage with whoever it is to discuss their issues.
@MartinP991: This would seem to be an issue about Wikipedia (specifically, the English-language Wikipedia), so you'd have to take it up there, not here on Wikimedia Commons. - Jmabel ! talk16:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
wiki commons website wont load in browser
Good Day,
I am facing a unique issue. wiki commons website won't load on any of my browsers (brave, firefox, chrome, edge).
Wikipedia , wikimedia etc open and work properly, but wiki commons won't open.
The only way I can access wiki commons is by going to wiki media and then clicking on wiki commons.
clicking on an image from Wikipedia will not open wiki commons.
the browser says connection to wiki commons is not secure. I am at a total loss here as to how to resolve this issue.
please help. STC1 (talk) 10:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Disable gadget
no idea
Hi, Anyone have any idea what the gadget in the picture is called and how I turn it off please?, Barely had any sleep today so I've probably missed something glaringly obvious which if I have I apologise!, Anyway Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk15:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
You sir are amazing thank you so much, The popup itself says "Popups" yet somehow I still managed to miss it entirely!, Anyway thanks again Magnus greatly appreciate your swift help, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk15:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have unfortunately messed up trying to upload a new image to a Wikipedia article. I followed the instructions on the uploader and it said a file already exists with that name and to replace it if I wanted. As I was trying to upload a photo of someone to replace the current one on the Wikipedia article, I assumed doing that was fine, and edited the file details to match.
However the photo, although of the same person, is a different photo to the original and so I realised I probably should have uploaded that as a separate file. So I've undone all those changes now.
I'm now (hopefully) correctly trying to upload it as a new file which I will reference on the article, however the uploader is saying:
Unknown warning: "duplicateversions"
Can anyone advise how I can properly upload this file please?
Rename request on File:Microscope, English, 1830-1850, given to Lord Lister by his Wellcome L0057966.jpg and other problems.
Hi Folks,
Is it possible to rename this image. I had real trouble finding it last night. Perhaps rename to Microscope given to Lord Lister in 1849 by his father Joseph Jackson Lister. Perhaps move the Wellcome L0057966 into descriptive text. A lot of the image associated with Lister don't seem to visible on a search for Joseph Lister or Lord Lister. That is problem because there is a many associated with him that need to go into the article. For example the image of a syringe that is used in The art of medicine Joseph Lister’s domestic science at [1] is not visible. That is probably a Welcome image and it must be on here somewhere as it was core to his discoveries. I can't find it. So I think a wholesale reordering is needed.
Thanks.
Scope creep (talk) 09:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Update. I see the syringe image is not on here, which is odd. I thought all of it would have been on. Here it is in the welcome collection: Syringe. I'll upload it. Scope creep (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
It's a scene from the movie itself. It certainly can't be on Commons (we don't allow images here on a "fair use" basis at all), but might be allowed on the English-language Wikipedia (you would upload locally to an image page there and use a non-free use rationale on the image page). Take a look at en:Wikipedia:Non-free content. It's a bit complicated, but if you want to do something like this, you'll need to understand policy in that area. - Jmabel ! talk02:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
@OPRF: Привет и добро пожаловать. File:Александр Холодов.jpg был удален в 02:40, 21 февраля 2022 г. (UTC) администратором Túrelio (talk | contribs) как имеющий «Нет разрешения с 13 февраля 2022 г.» после Oesterreicher12 заметил, что фотография не является вашей собственной работой, а администратор AntiCompositeNumber заметил, что у нее недостаточно прав. Затем вы загрузили одноимённое имя с https://www.oprf.ru/member_profile/kholodov-aleksandr-lvovich#nav_1 Сергея Миннигалина, которое имеет приемлемый CC-BY-4.0. Пожалуйста, см. Commons:Licensing/ru, чтобы узнать, почему мы не можем принять первую фотографию как есть, и в будущих таких ситуациях фотограф должен опубликовать соответствующее разрешение Commons:Licensing для такой работы на своем веб-сайте или в социальных сетях или отправить фотографию. и разрешение через VRT/ru с копией вам. Если вы не можете получить соответствующую лицензию, фотография все равно может быть загружена в английскую или русскую Википедию в соответствии с en:WP:F или ru:ВП:КДИ, потому что здесь мы не разрешаем добросовестное использование. См. также COM:SIGN/ru.
It has been more than 10 years since I uploaded a book. I need to upload The History of the Norman Conquest by Edward Augustus Freeman but cannot remember what to do. I managed to use the upload tool but can't complete it can you advise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daytrivia (talk • contribs) 00:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Yea I did but when I try to go to make the page at wikisource Index:The History of the Norman Conquest... It gives me "Unknown file:Index: The History of the Norman Conquest...." and I cannot dp anything to it. Daytrivia (talk) 07:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
I wanted to upload two files to commons that will contribute to a Wikipedia page I made, namely this one and this one. In the sidebar of both links, the following is written:
Copyright details * Please note. You may download this photo for private use. This does not mean that the copyright has expired. If you use this photo in a publication, in writing, on the Internet or otherwise, you bear the responsibility for the consequences. After all, a copyright holder may still come forward.
The thing is, according to article 37 of the Dutch Copyright act, the pictures would be public domain if no one would claim it after 70 years. So this would not be an issue right?
Then to my second problem: if I would upload them, do I have to follow additional (internal) rules? For example, do I have to specify where I got it from, do I have to name the file a certain way? And I assume I can use the {{PD-US-expired}} license since it's public domain in my country and before 1927? I don't want to upload these pictures if it would not be allowed so I want to be extra careful with that.
Thanks in advance,
--IamjustJ✉18:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ooligan: that shounds OK. please go ahead and upload, or write down the urls here so that they can be better investigated.--RZuo (talk) 17:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Kullanıcı Adı Hakkında
Merhabalar Kullanıcı adım, Eyup beyaz olarak gözükmekte, bunun Eyup Beyaz (Beyaz'ın B harfinin büyük B ile başlamasını istiyorum) olarak düzeltilmesini talep ediyorum. ilginize çok teşekkür ederim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyup beyaz (talk • contribs) 08:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello. My username, Eyup beyaz, appears as white, I would like it to be corrected as Eyup Beyaz (I want Beyaz's B letter to start with a capital B). Thank you very much for your attention.
URGENT: Shane Warne photo needs reversion to earlier image.
Australian Cricketer Shane Warne died today, and in consequence his Wikipedia biography is attracting considerable attention. Unfortunately, someone has today updated File:Shane Warne February 2015.jpg [3] in a manner which alters the image aspect ratio, and in consequence the shape of Warne's head. While I'm in no doubt the edit was well intentioned, it clearly needs reverting as a matter of urgency, before this misleading image propagates further. I'd attemplt the revert myself, but am unsure how to do this, and don't want to mess things up further. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Having attempted to revert this myself, I've now come to the conclusion that the aspect ratio was correct all along, at least with the file as shown on Commons, and restored it to Stemoc's latest version. I suspect there may have been some sort of cache issue somewhere, making it look odd on browsers. It was definitely wrong at one point on Wikipedia, as I wasn't the only person to see the problem. Hopefully we are all good now, though it would be nice to know where the problem arose. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Too wide. Didn't get a screenshot. I suspect it was a mismatch due to the cropping being changed between versions, resulting in the image from one version being stretched to fit the shape of the other. Has to be a bug somewhere. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Report
I want to know if you lost your school results for grade10 for your previous high school in years back how did you get them? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.116.3.173 (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Was that for a specific user? If so, I'd actually ask in his personal talk page. Anyway, I'm afraid even then it's not something to be discussed on Commons. This type of private discussion should really be held on a private medium, like an email. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 12:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
If I lost my school results, I would ask my mum, or try contacting the school. But in my case the school would have destroyed them decades ago, being pre-digital paper era. ;) Because of privacy reasons, they wouldn't be using Commons as a repository. Pelagic (talk) 09:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Username/account problem
For some reason lost to me now, I seem to have a different username for Wikimedia Commons (Picadder) from the one I use across all Wikipedias (mainly the English one, but have made a few edits on others), i.e. Laterthanyouthink. When I tried to sign up for the Wikipedia Library and elected to log in, it logs me in as Picadder and rejects me because of fewer than 500 edits here. I have made over 51,000 edits on Wikipedia. Are these two accounts separate? Can they be merged? Picadder (talk) 02:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Oh. Thanks for your prompt response, @Jeff G.: . But should I not be able to get access to Wikipedia Library via my WP account though? When I select "login via Wikipedia" on this page, it automatically picks up my Picadder account. Picadder (talk) 03:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Ah, thanks, Jeff G.. I have now got to the bottom of the problem, and hope it can be sorted out. It turns out that Picadder is attached to one email address, and I do in fact have an account as Laterthanyouthink on Wikimedia as well, under the email address that I use for all of my other Wikipedia stuff. I don't know how I did this, but what do you (or anyone else reading this) suggest that I do? Can I inactivate the Picadder one so that this confusion does not arise again? (My various password-storing apps must have saved Picadder at some point and I was just using whatever popped up at the time... so will have to ensure that they save the other one for future use.) The good news is, I had already created a Wikipedia Library account, just not got around to using it yet.) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi can you help me. I just uploaded a graphics file recently that I created and only after I had saved it did I note that it was the wrong version of the plot. I have created a second, correct version, but is there any way to delete the incorrect one? Thanks MichaelLockwood (talk) 15:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The advanced search on Flickr allows you to limit licenses in the search. Choose "commercial use and mods allowed" (the default there is "any license")
May sites are similar in one or another respect, but I don't think any other general-use site has a comparable number of images that are likely to be useful to Commons. Someone else might be able to suggest one.
Typically, you should be able to search on commons for the numeric id from Flickr. That won't be a 100% foolproof approach, but should work pretty well. If you upload with Flickr2Commons, that should typically be able to determine whether the image has already been uploaded and link to where it already is.
I'm afraid you need to ask English Wikipedia about English Wikipedia. If the images are free-licensed, though, they should typically end up on Commons, not en-wiki.
Can I upload a photo that I took of an ancient symbol?
The symbol was printed on a piece of paper by someone else.
Doing a google image search, the symbol looks like a kamana yantra.
Here is a link to a Wikipedia article for that symbol.
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yantra
Can I consider the picture that I took of the piece of paper to be "my own work"?
@Atom Miner: the problem is that in all likelihood any particular drawing of a symbol like that would be complex enough (and involve enough choices) to merit copyright. So copyright would belong to the person who drew it (and snapping a photo of an artwork either creates no copyright at all for you, or creates one only as a derivative work). So probably not OK for Commons. - Jmabel ! talk01:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
The person doesn't want attribution
A friend wants to give me a photo I'd like to upload on Commons but doesn't want his name be revealed. Can I say the photo is mine? --Dr Salvus (talk) 09:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ellywa ops, I've arleady made this mistake. I've uploaded a friend's photo who doesn't want his indentity be revealed and I've said the photo is mine. What should be done? Dr Salvus (talk) 09:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus: You should edit the file description to make it correct. That would at least entail changing the author (probably to {{Anonymous}}) and the source, and replacing the {{Self}} template with {{Cc-zero}} and {{subst:PP}}. Then follow the second sentence of Ellywa's recommendation above. --bjh21 (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ellywa and @Bjh21. He doesn't want to email and asked me to say the photo is mine. I'm talking about the photo of the Ariane Vector 5 I uploaded yesterday. What should I do? Dr Salvus (talk) 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi @Dr Salvus. You could assist your friend to create a one-off pseudonymous account. Email address isn't required if they never want to recover the password. Logs for IP address etc. are only retained for 30 days AFAIK. (If your friend is subject to a regime which is hostile to free media, then extra precautions would be warranted.) ⁓ Pelagic (talk) 20:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Uploading mp3
I have an mp3 file that should be on Wikipedia. It is the audio of the F5 tornado as it came through Guin, Alabama on April 3, 1974. If I send this file to someone, can they upload it where it needs to go and get it fixed on some page? I can give a description of the file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graywolf1980 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
I cannot find anywhere to report something without first clicking on the article. But there is an article named "erotic activities involving children" that I want to report and do not want to open. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1700:1A20:6020:C0C9:91AC:B884:EE8 (talk) 19:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
There are no articles on Commons, so I really don't know what this person is talking about. And I, for one, am not going to do a search on that string! - Jmabel ! talk01:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
There is Category:Erotic activities involving children. That contains mostly late C18 to early C20 book illustrations (engravings), with a couple of oriental artworks and Grecian / Graeco-Roman artefacts. There is a subcat for Japanese-style lolicon drawings. No evidence for exploitation of currently or recently living persons in the production of the images. Pelagic (talk) 19:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment changer une photo qui avait besoin d'être nettoyée
Bonjour J'essai de changer une version d'une photo qui est sale. Le photographe a nettoyé la photo pour y enlever les imperfections. Lorsque que j’essaie, on me refuse parce que le fichier est en .png et que l'originale serai en .jpg.
Merci de m'aider pour déposer une version améliorée de la photo.
I was unable to access my old account and needed to make a new one in order to upload a new image to a page. During this process the placement of the image has been placed incorrectly on the page, but due to my account being deemed 'too new' I am not able to resolve and fix this matter. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CICMarketing (talk • contribs) 15:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
@CICMarketing: New accounts should be able to upload, unless something has changed recently. Are you using the Special:UploadWizard? There could be different restrictions if you're trying to upload non-free media to Wikipedia rather than freely-licensed files here on Commons. Pelagic (talk) 20:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
There seems to be a Debian default limit of 3200px for width and height (amongst others) for the ImageMagick converter. It looks like I will have to upload a manually resized image under another filename. · · · Peter (Southwood)(talk): 06:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi! In the file description, there are a number of different colors. These colors are also present in the SVG original. However, the PNGs generated are lacking all colors except for grey-green, e.g. this one. Is this a bug in MediaWiki or one of the libraries that it is using? Cheers, --Tobias (talk) 10:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
That seems like a bug, or the SVG is in an incorrect format. I'd mention this issue in discussion page of the file. I'll investigate it and try to validate the SVG once I get back home from work. A valid SVG shouldn't produce any render bugs. If I find the SVG not valid, I'll try to fix and clean the SVG code to make it valid, and upload a new version. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 11:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
@Tobias: So I guess there is something wrong with the file itself, not directly with the MediaWiki software. It's strange that it renders okay in direct browser SVG renderer, but MediaWiki fails to render it correctly. I've investigated a little bit and the issue was first produced by User:Виталий Болбас in his revision from 30th of October 2018. This revision attempted to reduce the size of the file, which was a success, but MediaWiki renderer then failed to produce an image and instead showed a blank canvas. Later revision fixed the blank canvas, but failed to return colours back. I don't know how the page looked like in 2018, maybe it is an issue of MediaWiki afterall, but it's strange that it works with the older revisions from 2013 (larger files) just fine. It must be something within the file that triggers a bug in the MediaWiki software. I don't have another explanation. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 09:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
@MaitreyaVaruna: It's an automated bot, which means that it acts based on the information it can understand (which is slightly different to a human). Based on the reply above, it was because an unregistered editor incorrectly attempted to change the template format; you can see the edit, here. As a result, the bot couldn't detect that it was released as CC-BY-SA 4.0, even though any person could easily just see and read it, despite it displaying as plain text {{cc-by-sa-4.0|attribution=|migration=}}. — Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 01:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion requests shortcut
Hi guys, I want to speedy delete a file name that has an error name but doesn't work. I tried the one that is similar at w:en:Wikipedia but it shows a red link (for example: {{db-g1}}). Can anyone tell me the speedy deletion requests shortcut here at Commons? SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
@SeanJ 2007: According to Wikidata, this template doesn't have its direct counterpart on Commons. There are however templates for file deletion, just search. One quick sweep of Wikidata revealed {{Speedydelete}}, which is related to the Wikipedia's {{db}}. So the more specific template for speedy deletion doesn't exist on Commons as it seems. This template seems to be also for file deletion as you wish, so I'd stick with that template. Otherwise, use the search to find the template you need. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 07:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
@Supercheap auto: I guess you mean this file, right? I'm not sure how much the logo has changed and how the treshold for change is set so the new logo has to be uploaded as a separate file instead of a new revision. I guess if the change is ever so slightly subtle, you may upload the SVG of the new logo as a new revision of the existing original file. If the logo has changed so it looks completely different, I'd suggest uploading it as a new file, and give it a new name (so let's say the year in which the logo has changed), make sure the name of the file explains what's different. Also, in both cases, it should be noted that threshold of originality should be met, because I think the official original logo is copyrighted, which is not suitable for Commons. Threshhold of originality means you can upload a simplified SVG version of the file given that it doesn't resemble the original logo too much. This is a risk because naturally people have their own threshold of originality and it's very hard to assume whether the simplified logo is simplified enough to be considered below the threshold so it doesn't induce copyright infridgement, so the file might be a subject for removal as the community might come to an agreement that the file doesn't meet the threshold of originality requirements, but in all cases, you should be able to upload a lower resolution version of the original logo to English Wikipedia under Fair Use (which is not applicable on Commons). Not all Wikipedias make use of Fair Use, so bear that in mind. That's also the reason why Fair Use material cannot be uploaded to Commons, because everything uploaded here is accessible in all wikis, and Fair Use isn't applicable in many countries which have their own Wikipedia, which would make a contradiction about using all resources on Commons. The only exception to copyrighted material not being allowed on Commons are official logos of Wikimedia Foundation projects (such as Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, etc.), they are of course hosted on Commons to be accessible from all wikis. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 10:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
So I visited the websites of Supercheap Auto and it seems like the logo didn't change all that much, it was just simplified. However, I'm quite afraid that uploading the new version would induce copyright infridgement as there's no way to further simplify the new logo, so you'll have to upload it to English Wikipedia under Fair Use instead I guess. All other wikis will use the older logo, sadly. Or alternatively discuss this with your employer, they'll probably redirect you to the legal team of Supercheap Auto, and you can discuss this matter with them. In all cases make sure that you're not about to violate copyright. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 10:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Oh, you already uploaded the new file, and marked it as your own work under CC-BY-4.0 — I'm not sure if this is actually allowed considering SCA Terms and Conditions. I'm not going to address this issue in the file discussion yet, I just want to make sure you know what you are doing. The logo is a subject for copyright and while it may not be suitable for Commons, you still may upload it to English Wikipedia under Fair Use. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 10:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Ok I doing a project with my son About Caribbean Hero's
To our astonishment there was no picture online on ur wikipage about Ulric Cross himself
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ulric_Cross&action=edit
ITs the West Indies highest decorated soldier from WW2, so we see him talk here on the BBC program from 1944
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViGwxJloI70&ab_channel=BFI
So I made a still with snagit that makes him look good and uploaded here, now I get all these licensing questions but I have no idea or time to figure it out. File seems to be owned by the UK BFI archives but I cant see what license to use?
I get the message that in 7 days it will be deleted ?
But this is a huge hero and inspiration to others so pls tell me what license to use?
It would be awesome to put an image on this page.
Kind rgds,
Daigoro
@DaigoroLiam: Hello. I'm afraid the film you took this file from is still copyrighted and non-free. This British documentary was made by Paul Rotha who died in 1984, so his works are still copyrighted until 2054. You cannot upload a still pic from that film here at Commons because there is no free licence you could apply, and all uploads at Commons need to be free for anyone to use. I will, however, upload a smaller version of your image directly at the English Wikipedia where it may be kept with a fair use rationale. De728631 (talk) 19:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
How to add logo of a company?
Hello,
I am trying to add the logo of Dream Games with the logo from their website but I am not sure if it will be removed from the page again. How can I be sure that it will not be removed or what is the best way for uploading a logo for a company? — Preceding unsigned comment added by H5r2n (talk • contribs) March 9th 2022 12.59 (UTC)
Logos of companies are often subject for copyright. Legitimate reason to use it on Wikipedia might be Fair Use, but that's not applicable to Commons. You may upload the logo to English Wikipedia under Fair Use, but cannot be uploaded to Commons. One way to get a logo on Commons is meeting the Commons:Threshold of originality requirements. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 13:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
If the logo is just the word "Dream" and that little star thing, then I think that is below the threshold of originality. - Jmabel ! talk16:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
@Jmabel: To be honest, Threshold of originality is a little bit complicated matter. It all depends on where the logo is originating and/or where the uploader is originating. For example, Czech Republic, where I am from, does not have something that utilizes the Threshold of originality in our laws. I'm not sure whether as Czech Republic's citizen I am allowed to upload a logo of an abroad company originating from a country that does utilize the Threshold of originality, or I'm still obliged to not upload anything that violates laws in my country even the logo in question is for a company that originates from let's say United States where Threshold of originality does take place. I certainly cannot upload a logo of a company residing in Czech Republic if the logo in question is copyrighted. No Threshold of originality takes place there for Czech Republic, so it's a little bit tougher for Czech Wikipedians writing articles about Czech companies as Czech Wikipedia doesn't even allow Fair Use and all files that are used on these sites must come from Commons, which doesn't allow Fair Use material eighter. One prime example would be Avast Software, which is in fact originally a Czech antivirus developer company (originally called Alwil Software, which actually started out writing MS-DOS malware) I'm no lawyer, and vast majority of users on this site are in similar position, so it's always good to ask someone for legal advice. Now that Avast is owned by Norton (U.S. company), those restrictions may not apply now, and there is actually a current logo on Commons, but I don't think you'll find older logos on Commons prior to the company stocks being sold to Norton, and that's because Czech Republic doesn't have any law that would utilize the Threshold of originality. But I'm no lawyer and I'm sure vast majority of users here are in similar position, so it's always good to ask someone for a legal advice. Furthermore, if I'm mistaken in something, please, feel free to point it out, correct me if needed. I will welcome that. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 20:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
And to proof what I meant can be found right here:
The work must be "a unique outcome of the creative activity of the author".[121/2000–2006 Art.2(1)] For photographs and computer programs, it suffices if the work "is original in the sense that it is the author’s own intellectual creation".[121/2000–2006 Art.2(2)]
There are many cases for many countries around the world, so please feel free to find a country or countries you're interested in and take a time to read what you need to know. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 20:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
I am a Wikipedia editor with almost no concept of Wikimedia commons, other than as a store of items used on WMF sites. I want to incorporate source data for an existing commons image that's used on Wikipedia, so that the actual source of the image (in the Detroit Public Library Digital Collection) will be documented and verifiable. Here are the details:
1) No, as there is nothing creative in making a crop. 2) You can upload such a crop only if the source-video had been released under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 13:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
@Graptaloyia: If you uploaded it recently (within a week) and it is not in use, you can just mark it with "{{subst:My bad upload}}" and it will be deleted.
If it's older, though, and you granted a license that conforms with COM:L, typically those licenses are irrevocable, so you'd have to nominate it for deletion just like if it was anyone else's upload. - Jmabel ! talk19:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
@Jmabel: Thanks so much for your reply. If I may follow up please, what kind of period would make it "older"? And what would be acceptable grounds "to nominate it for deletion"? Graptaloyia (talk) 19:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
@Graptaloyia: "older" => "uploaded more than a week ago" (referencing the previous bullet item).
Hello. This is a help desk for questions about using and operating Wikimedia Commons and sometimes also other Wikimedia projects. Please note that we are not a general information service. De728631 (talk) 22:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Add Renee Poussaint to Wikipedia
I want to recommend adding Renee Poussaint an award-winning local Washington, DC newscaster and correspondent for ABC News who stepped away from journalism in the late 1990s to pursue endeavors to educate young people about Black history and civil rights. She died March 4, 2022, at her home in the District of Columbia from lung cancer. She was 77.
Hello KarenBettina. This help desk is not for Wikipedia but for Wikimedia Commons. We do not have any articles like Wikipedia – instead we are the free media repository for Wikipedia and other such projects. Anyhow, you may want to read Help:Your first article at the English Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 22:04, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Ten days ago, I asked a photographer to be authorised to publish some of his photos on commons but he hasn't replied yet. Can I publish the photos and put the template "permission pending"? --Dr Salvus (talk) 22:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Urheber hat Datei freigegeben. Rechtlicher Status?
Hallo allerseits
Ich bin noch sehr neu hier auf Commons und habe noch nicht den kompletten Durchblick, wie das mit den Lizenzen und der Gemeinfreit aussieht. Konkret geht es darum, dass ich kürzlich eine Datei hochgeladen habe, der dafür zuständige Bot interverniert hat, da gewisse Lizenzangaben fehlten. Ich habe daraufhin die Erlaubnis des Urhebers per E-Mail eingeholt. Wie mache ich das jetzt? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FWS AM (talk • contribs) 17:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Hallo FWS AM. Bei amtlichen Werken dieser Art aus der Schweiz kann man meiner Meinung nach sowieso den Lizenzbaustein {{PD-Switzerland-official}} verwenden. Den habe ich jetzt dort eingesetzt. Welche Freigabe hast du denn vom Urheber erhalten? De728631 (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Der Urheber antwortete mir direkt per E-Mail und meinte, ich könne diese Datei „frei weiterverwenden“. --FWS AM (talk) 06:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
@FWS AM: (Mit Hilfe von Google Translate) Leider ist das nicht genug. Wir brauchen eine bestimmte Lizenz und wir brauchen einen Nachweis dieser Lizenz. Entweder müssen sie eine Lizenz ausdrücklich auf einer Website oder Seite erteilen, die eindeutig ihrer Kontrolle unterliegt, oder sie müssen den unter Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/de beschriebenen Prozess durchlaufen. - Jmabel ! talk16:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Gut, ich kann euch schon vorweg sagen, dass die diesen abartig bürokratischen Prozess nicht durchlaufen werden und ich auch keine Lust habe, das in die Wege zu leiten. Warum sollten sie auch? Als Regierung haben sie sicher Besseres zu tun. Wenn ihr also meint, meine Beiträge stellten eine Urheberrechtsverletzung dar, löscht sie.--FWS AM (talk) 21:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Such photos need to come with a free licence stated explicitely at the website where you found them. Another possibility would be photos that are out of copyright because of their age. Please see Commons:Licensing for acceptable licenses. De728631 (talk) 21:45, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Images Uploading Time
Hello, I've just created my account few moment later. I am so proud to be a part of our community. And I want to upload some photos ... But those couldn't be uploaded : it says that it is a connexion's problem. Then I verified my connexion, but it was normal. And I uploaded again one image, but it was not been uploaded. 😭🥺😭
Please, Could you help me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ny Mario Sempervirent (talk • contribs) 11:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus: First of all, are those photos your own work? If so, what camera did you use that the image ended up with a watermark? I know some cellphone models do actually stamp the photos with a watermark of the cellphone make, I'm not quite sure where to disable that feature or if it even can be disabled (personally, I hate that). So I guess that is what you want to remove? But if you tell the cellphone model or your camera model, we could find a way to disable watermark stamp on that camera. If it's a date&time watermark stamp, most camera makes should have an option to disable it. If the photo isn't your own work and you downloaded it from somewhere on the Internet (hence the watermark probably showing copyright status), I'm afraid that Commons cannot accept that photo for legal reasons. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 21:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm trying to upload a few images. They look fine on my pc but are rotated when uploaded. Any advice on how I get them the right way up gratefully received. An example of the issue I'm facing is here, [[File:Head of a god - MARQ exhibition of Etruscan art - March 2022.jpg]]. KJP1 (talk) 10:29, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't think quality is a major reason for a file deletion if you mean that. Files could be deleted for copyright violations, etc. I don't think that these images are copyright protected. They may be eighter below the TOO or his own photos. Quality isn't necessarily a major decision criteria for file deletion or to be replaced. Everything depends on the context. If those photos may not be directly usable in articles, they still make up quite valuable addition to galleries on Commons. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 21:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
@Polda18: I mean, some of the stuff. Like the "placenta broccoli" thing, which probably doesn't have a better alternative, but stuff like the barbecue sauce image have tons of better images. QuickQuokka [talk]07:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
@QuickQuokka: Well, I didn't look up every single file he uploaded. Partly because I wasn't really that interested, and mainly because I hardly have time to look up one's entire upload history. But as I said, even if there are better images to be used in Wikipedia or Wikivoyage articles for example, lower quality images can still make for a valuable contribution to the gallery here on Commons. In fact, categories kind of work like automatic galleries. If there isn't really a serious reason to delete the file or to get it replaced by another, then let it be. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 08:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
You are probably going to have to be a lot more specific about what help you want.
If this is really about Wikipedia then you should probably ask there (this is Wikimedia Commons, not Wikipedia). - Jmabel ! talk00:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Am I allowed to use Pictures already used on Wikipedia posted by other users for the use of a new Wikipedia draft? I am making with the intention of getting it approved and posted as an official Wikipedia page for the Draft subject.
@Kai3952: I guess the first is for art from anywhere depicting ships wrought in Taiwan or used by Taiwan's navy, and the second is for art created in Taiwan that depicts any ships from anywhere. And individual files and subcats can be in both. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me12:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
You don't say "winning" what but, in any competition, obviously the higher the quality of the photo, in any sense, the better its chance of winning. - Jmabel ! talk17:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Do you think categorizing files is a "waste of wiki-resources"?
Someone thinks that everything I'm doing is a "waste of wiki-resources" because he said that I not only do meaningless things to increase my edit count but also always liked to find fault with all they have done here. Even though he never told me what he wanted me to do, I already knew where my problem was. Do you think categorizing files is a "waste of wiki-resources"?--Kai3952 (talk) 16:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
That person bullies you. Claiming that categorizing files isn't such a waste of resources will never convince that person because it's just an argument to bully you. Just keep doing what you're doing for Commons, have fun doing it because it makes a lot of sense. You help people to find images they wouldn't have found otherwise. Wouter (talk) 16:26, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
But he has a lot of people behind him supporting him and I also see a lot of people complaining to him about me so that forced me to think about why I've become a troublemaker that everyone hates.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
If there is a whole group of people and they keep bullying you, I'd consider reporting them for harrasment. Some people do really nasty stuff out of jealousy or simply hatred. They're dead convinced that categorising is a waste of time and waste of whatnot. As said, you won't convince them otherwise, linking to a relevant page won't change their behaviour, so the only thing you can do right now is do what you do and just ignore them, and if they don't stop, report them for harrasment. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 17:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes, he came to me for those who complained so he was completely not interested in my explanation. I'll just give a random example. For example, they complained that I was over-categorizing because these categories I created were so unnecessary in their eyes. To give another example, image grabed from facebook or government website, no evidence of permission for its upload under a free licence, so I nominated to deletion and then they started to get extremely unpleasant about my abusing the DR process. No matter how I explain it to him, he always find a way to convince me, that would result in the untenable situation where nobody could claim "misbehaviour" by him.--Kai3952 (talk) 20:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
I have spent so much time and energy on him/them (or, say, on things that don't matter). I don't know how to stay away from those people who take away my peace of mind.--Kai3952 (talk) 22:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
@Kai3952: Well, I have no idea on how long this is taking. But if you feel that this is going too long or too far, just report them for harrasment, I'm sure something is going to be done about that. The Universal Code of Conduct (UCOC) is of course in effect, and there are new official enforcement guidelines being voted on to be ratified. Those global enforcement guidelines are essentially to kind of unify the way the enforcement works on each project, to connect the projects even more. One of the key bullet points is of course section about threats, bullying and harrasment. So essentially they keep bullying you, disregarding your work regardless of your arguments. I know nothing about the background, but this does seem like a serious harrasment issue to me. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 22:57, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Unfortunately, my account on Chinese-language Wikipedia has been blocked by the Taiwanese admin. He thinks that it is necessary to stop my behavior, like continued arguing without accepting any responsibility for what I did myself. Not only that, he also has believed that my explanation is very threatening and intimidating to Taiwanese users. However, it is what someone believes or thinks, and is not necessarily the truth. Most of Taiwanese who have edited files are active on Chinese-language Wikipedia than Wikimedia Commons (which of course also contains the admin who blocked me) so I can understand why they misunderstand our policies and categorizing files. If I report to the UCoC, I'm afraid they will trust the admin, and then the result is "global blocked" by them. At this moment my only option is to live for them——My problem is that I don't know how to learn to work with other in ways that are benefiting a community of Taiwanese contributors.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
I am unfamiliar with the personal conflict mentioned. As to the heading question, I consider correctly categorizing files to be one of the most important and high value tasks on Wikimedia. -- 03:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
Taiwanese users do in fact think differently from the way our did, since Wikipedia Commons consists of files, we are very different from Chinese-language Wikipedia in many ways, I'm guessing that's probably the case. I am currently starting my fifth year on Wikipedia Commons where I am proud to have taken part in the most important and high value tasks. Not only can I correctly categorizing files, but also I can create new categories to help propel the categorization tasks forward. However, I'm not good at dealing with relationships between people, not to mention disputes between editors (personal conflict). Whilst what I'm doing now is good for Wikipedia, relatively speaking, my ignorance is a provocation in their eyes. If you're right, it might mean that they attempt to "overturn" our consensus for categorizing files. Because I know from their complaints what they considered to be the meaning and usage for categorizing files:
When the number of files is not enough to create categories for them. For example, it makes no sense to create categories for those extremely less number of files.
When existing categories are sufficient for current needs and enough to distinguish the difference between each file. For example, it makes no sense to create intermediate categories that hinder their convenience in use.
Please I want to upload a biography of a notable person from Nigeria. Please help as it's proving to be difficult to upload. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMK-Hassan (talk • contribs) 20:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
I am a teacher at Universidade Federal da Paraíba in Brazil and I would like to use the image bellow as part of the logo of my reaserch group: Línguas, Sistemas de Escrita, Computação e Humanidades Digitais (Languages, Writing Systems, Computation and Digital Humanities).
Public Domain
File:Azimuthal-equidistant.jpg
Created: 6 October 2006
This won't be the only image in the logo, just one and in small size, inside of the letter 'O' in 'LISCOD', the acronym of the above mentioned research group.
I didn't find mention to the author, so I wold like to know if it possible for me to legally make the use above mentioned.
Looks like someone messed up on the licensing there (and User:Mdf hasn't been active here in over a decade). I'd make a strong guess that the file is legitimately the work of a NASA employee, and is therefore public domain, but I wish this had been done more cleanly. - Jmabel ! talk01:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
YouTube clip channel has a CC license, but not the original source
Assume you're on YouTube. You take a screenshot from a "clip channel" of a podcast ([4]), which has a CC license, and upload it to Commons. Later, another editor shows up and points out that while it is true that the "clip channel" has a CC license, the original video [5] from where it is clipped from does not - and since the clip is a derivative work of the original video, the CC license is invalid. Both the clip channel and the original full-length video are presumed to belong to the same owner. Is there precedent for dealing with these cases, where the CC licenses don't match? Pilaz (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
It all depends on the file license. Is the file you've uploaded your own work? That means you are the author of the work in that file? If so, are you uploading the file with license compatible with Commons? Commons has two licenses that are compatible: Creative Commons and Public Domain. Creative Commons is the most used one as it releases the work for free, yet it still ensures some form of authorship protection. Public Domain is basically without any kind of license, you're essentially giving your authorship up. If the file isn't your own, then you have to know the license under which the file is uploaded. First of all, Commons doesn't allow uploading of a Fair Use content. That is possible only under certain language projects, such as English Wikipedia. Some countries don't utilize Fair Use, so be careful. If the license is compaible with Commons, you can upload it here or ask for importing from the project. Also note that there is something called Threshold of originality (TOO). That basically means you can upload let's say a logo that is deemed to be too simple for copyright protection. Each country has different TOO criteria, however. If I missed something, or misunderstood, then my apologize. I don't speak Greek, so I had to use an automatic translator to translate it to English. I also translated this reply from English to Greek with DeepL. It's not perfect.
Όλα εξαρτώνται από την άδεια χρήσης του αρχείου. Είναι το αρχείο που ανεβάσατε δική σας δουλειά; Αυτό σημαίνει ότι είστε ο δημιουργός του έργου σε αυτό το αρχείο; Αν ναι, ανεβάζετε το αρχείο με άδεια χρήσης συμβατή με την Commons; Το Commons έχει δύο άδειες που είναι συμβατές: Creative Commons και Public Domain. Η Creative Commons είναι η πιο συχνά χρησιμοποιούμενη, καθώς απελευθερώνει το έργο δωρεάν, αλλά εξακολουθεί να εξασφαλίζει κάποια μορφή προστασίας της πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας. Το Public Domain είναι ουσιαστικά χωρίς κανενός είδους άδεια, ουσιαστικά παραδίδετε τη συγγραφική σας ιδιότητα. Εάν το αρχείο δεν είναι δικό σας, τότε πρέπει να γνωρίζετε την άδεια με την οποία έχει αναρτηθεί το αρχείο. Πρώτα απ' όλα, τα Commons δεν επιτρέπουν τη μεταφόρτωση περιεχομένου δίκαιης χρήσης. Αυτό είναι εφικτό μόνο στο πλαίσιο ορισμένων γλωσσικών έργων, όπως η αγγλική Βικιπαίδεια. Ορισμένες χώρες δεν χρησιμοποιούν τη Δίκαιη Χρήση, οπότε να είστε προσεκτικοί. Αν η άδεια χρήσης είναι συμβατή με το Commons, μπορείτε να το ανεβάσετε εδώ ή να ζητήσετε την εισαγωγή από το έργο. Σημειώστε επίσης ότι υπάρχει κάτι που ονομάζεται Κατώφλι πρωτοτυπίας (TOO). Αυτό ουσιαστικά σημαίνει ότι μπορείτε να ανεβάσετε ας πούμε ένα λογότυπο που θεωρείται πολύ απλό για προστασία πνευματικών δικαιωμάτων. Ωστόσο, κάθε χώρα έχει διαφορετικά κριτήρια TOO. Αν μου ξέφυγε κάτι ή αν δεν κατάλαβα καλά, τότε ζητώ συγγνώμη. Δεν μιλάω ελληνικά, οπότε χρειάστηκε να χρησιμοποιήσω έναν αυτόματο μεταφραστή για να το μεταφράσω στα αγγλικά. Επίσης, μετέφρασα αυτή την απάντηση από τα αγγλικά στα ελληνικά με το DeepL. Δεν είναι τέλειο. --Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 13:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Oh, and another fair warning. Even if you took a photo of let's say an artwork, you're the author of the photo, but you still may not upload the photo to Commons if the artwork in the photo is still copyrighted. That is the case with many Andy Warhol's pictures for example, which are valuable and photos of these pictures would be great to be hosted on Commons, but they're still copyright protected. That's a fair warning to note. Copyright is sadly something that ties hands for free sharing. I'm not going to run this note through DeepL again, this is just something I wanted to add on top of that. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 13:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
For the first question, if AI generated work would subject to copyright would depend on details, same as non-AI generated. As software is copyrightable, I presume copyright could be asserted by the designers/owners of the AI program of whatever subsequent works it might produce. As to the second question, most definitely it does matter. See Commons:Derivative works. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
The US Copyright Office recently rejected a work as being AI created and thus not being subject to copyright. Most of the commentators, however, were of the opinion the fact that the user was pushing the "independently created by AI" angle was key; that if he'd been really interested in copyright and put the emphasis on his creative influence, he would have got a copyright. Something like Google Translate is pretty clearly copyright free, but if there's a human in loop, pushing the AI in directions to create the work they want, using the program as a tool, copyright seems much more probable. Basically, I think the set of copyright-free AI works is going to be pretty rare or uninteresting; most things of interest are going to be stuff like Google Translate or Photoshop filters, where they take something creative and transform it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Photograph of a Victorian Artist
I would like to upload this to Wikimedia Commons. It is of a painter who died in 1853. It is possibly from a from a magazine that no longer exists. Would this be available as Free Use? BFP1 (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
It would certainly be public domain. (Not sure what you mean by "free use". "Fair use" is a legal justification to use certain copyrighted material without explicitly licensing it, not relevant for something this old, and in any case not accepted on Commons.) This should fall under {{PD-old-assumed}}. - Jmabel ! talk16:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't see any indication of public domain at the source. These look like normal, all rights reserved, images to me. --rimshottalk22:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Wanting to upload photos of a late artist's artwork to his Wikipedia page
I have been in touch with the estate of the artist Nate Dunn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nate_Dunn and we both want to upload photos of Nate Dunn's artwork on to his Wikipedia page. The estate is willing to authorize me to do this for them in writing but we are unsure how best to do it. What is the easiest way to upload a few images of Nate Dunn's artwork which is copyrighted to his estate but they want to allow it on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eejjcc (talk • contribs) 20:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Importing files from catalog.archives.gov (US National Archives)
Hello, I noticed that there are many public domain files at catalog.archives.gov that are not on Commons (I just uploaded this one manually, but manual uploads are a pain). I know there have been mass imports from US national archives in the past, can we reactivate whatever bot did that? Or is there some other way to easily import files from that website? Thanks, Buidhe (talk) 01:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@2001:FD0:200:400:0:0:0:2: I'm afraid this is a question for Wikipedia rather than Commons. Begin your journey in this page and don't forget to be bold. Both pages have interwiki links to other language Wikipedias, so it depends on your native language or which language you understand and want to edit. Also, I'd suggest you to create an account since it will help you to keep track of your edits and get proper attribution. The account is global, so it doesn't really matter where you create your account. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 08:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Wrong borders
Hey
An editor conflated 1812 with 1912 and added Morocco as a satellite state of the First French empire in 1812 which is totally unhistocal. Morocco was made a protectorate of France in 1912. Can someone change it? The file is
[6].197.153.44.16108:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
According to the map, it seems that the green blob on Western Africa doesn't belong to Morocco, but rather Senegal and part of Mauritania. While Mauritania was claimed in late 19th century according to Wikipedia, Senegal was part of French empire since 17th century when France began to trade with slaves. It is possible that French empire was slowly spreading to north in early 19th century as well and part of Mauritania was already claimed in 1812. I don't see Morocco being part of French empire on that map.
@Polda18: I'm talking about the light green (satellite states) spot in the most northern part of africa. The map's creator conflated 1812 with 1912.197.153.44.16115:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Polda18: But the map is misleading and it's been used for 8 years now without being noticed as such. Can you tell other map specialized editors to change it? Thank you197.153.44.16119:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Approval time for a new page on Wikipedia for Tour de Tuli
Good day,
Please could you assist me?
We have created a page for the Tour de Tuli, a fundraising event that traverses three countries in Africa - and would like to ask if there is any way in which we can fast-track the publishing of this page so that we're able to include it as a reference in our communications?
Please let me know if this is viable, and if so, how?
@Bronwen Blunden: Hello. This is not the help desk for Wikipedia, but for Wikimedia Commons which is Wikipedia's free media repository. Please edit your draft article at Draft:Tour de Tuli and place a string of code on top of the page: {{subst:AfC draft|Bronwen Blunden}} . This will notify the reviewers at the English Wikipedia who will then decide on the quality of your draft. De728631 (talk) 14:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Absolutely. It's work of an employee of the U.S. Army, taken in the line of duty, so it is in the public domain. - Jmabel ! talk00:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
@Hnsjrgnweis: Make sure to contact the president of the organization and tell them about COM:OTRS. Commons cannot trust such claims that "they gave me permission". It has to be officially signed and sent to the Wikimedia Foundation, otherwise anyone could claim they've got permission, while in reality they stole it. Believe me, you don't want to get through legal obligations regarding copyright. It has to be officially approved by the organization in writing, officially signed and sent to Wikimedia Foundation for approval review. Otherwise even if your claim is true, before it is officially in writing, nobody will believe it.
Also, the logo seems to be fairly simple. Take a look at COM:TOO#Germany to learn more about Threshold of originality in Germany. I can't asses whether this logo falls below the TOO in Germany (those laws will subsequently apply in this case). I'm afraid someone else will have to look at it and decide, preferably a lawyer specialized in copyright protection. Otherwise, an OTRS letter from the organization to WMF in order for it to be used. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 14:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Hnsjrgnweis and Polda18: If an organization intends to issue a free license for their logo, often the simplest way to do that is to indicate that license on their site, which can then be cited as a source, allowing anyone to upload here. - Jmabel ! talk15:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Jmabel: Well, according to the source page (translated to English using DeepL):
§ 3 Copyrights and ancillary copyrights
The contents published on this website are subject to German copyright and ancillary copyright law. Any use not permitted by German copyright and ancillary copyright law requires the prior written consent or that of the respective copyright holder. This applies in particular to the copying, editing, translation, storage, processing or reproduction of content in databases or other electronic media and systems. Third-party content and rights are marked as such. The unauthorised reproduction or transmission of individual contents or complete pages is not permitted and is punishable by law. Only the production of copies and downloads for personal, private and non-commercial use is permitted.
The display of this website in external frames is only permitted with our written permission.
The use of the contact data in our imprint for commercial advertising is expressly not desired unless we have given our prior written consent or a business relationship already exists. We and all persons named on our website hereby object to any commercial use and disclosure of their data.
How do I edit my file upload to add consent document
Some of the files I had uploaded in ignorance of the copyright guidance has been marked for deletion. Please do I add a consent note from the original owner to make these images stay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edyreuben (talk • contribs) 18:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
It seems to me to be pretty hard to upload files "in ignorance of the copyright guidance" since the upload process is more than somewhat explicit in asking questions, however hard I try to keep assuming good faith Timtrent (talk) 23:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
I need to upload two batches of about 100 files each. The easiest approach I've seen so far is to add them 50 at a time to the upload wizard and then manually write in all of the names/captions/descriptions, but this would be pretty time consuming and error prone. It would be nice if I could use like, an excel with a list of file names, captions and descriptions. I've read https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Guide_to_batch_uploading but frankly it's not that helpful. I tried the Pattypan and ComeOn! tools but they didn't work/gave errors when I tried to run them. I also tried pywikibot but it also gave errors. What is a good, user-friendly, tool that I can use to upload my files easily? Twistar48 (talk) 04:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Is there a way to check global usage of all your files?
Is there a way where you can check which one of your files are being used on wikis? But in a way where it shows all at once, so you don't have to click through every file you've uploaded to see if it's used.Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk19:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
This just tells me how many files are used, I've uploaded files that aren't my own work but I want to see which ones that were my own work that are used individually, kind of like the flickr2commons interface with the image on the left and the details on the right Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk14:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
@Lallint: If you want to see details for individual files, turn on "Show details". If the problem is that you only want your own creations, that's a little trickier since GLAMorous doesn't have a general way to check authorship. If you can put all your pictures in a category (like mine are in Category:Photographs by Ben Harris), or in a gallery (like User:Lallint/My Work), you can have it work from that, though. --bjh21 (talk) 16:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
SVG file translated via SVG Translator has a language selector, but doesn't work on the labels inside the image
Translated SVG that should display in Czech when clicked.
So the archive bot happened to archive the unanswered question of mine, which I would like to revive and get answered, please.
I've updated an existing SVG image (shown on right) by adding 3 languages in it - Czech, German, and English, while German is also an implicit language (the original used in the picture). What's strange is that the picture shows English language instead of the implicit one (which is German), and now that I used the {{Mld}} template in te file description, it does display language selection dropdown menu box, but it doesn't change the labels inside the image. Link from a translated thumbnail doesn't display the selected language in the image, eighter (it does however collapse other languages than selected in the description). How do I get language selector on the file page work on the labels in the image as well? Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 07:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
@Polda18: By Wikipedia, multilanguage can only be recognized with the restriction that the language switch is not "too far behind". In your file, the switch is defined more than 3 MB after the code start - that is known a non-working condition.
A workaround might be to have a transparent background for the embedded raster image, and define the text advancing the image.
I made a rather cheap workaround: the languages are defined additionally before the large image, just dummylike as empty statements. This way it works -- sarang♥사랑09:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
@Sarang: Oh my god, thank you. I didn't even realize that there was a limit to where the language selector first appears in order to be working. Seems like the SVG Translator tool is fairly straightforward and doesn't check for this condition to make it working for bigger files. I guess the biggest issue is the photo used as a background, which naturally contains a lot of data. I guess the photo could be a lower resolution picture, not a full resolution 12MPx photo as it seems. Really, the photo takes up vast majority of the file size. Anyway, it's good that all it takes is an empty dummy switch with all the defined languages and the functionality is restored. Thank you :-) Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 14:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Artists of Abraham Lincoln portraits (1893) (14591328138).jpg
@Mikalagrand: According to the file license tag, it seems like Flick from where this is taken contains a note about the copyright, which says that there are no known restrictions for this artwork. One reason could be that the artwork itself isn't actually copyrighted so it would be restricted, or the copyright is restricted, but not actually actively enforced. As for the Pollock reference, are you taking this info from the link in the author field or where? The links to Flickr seem to be dead. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 07:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
@Polda18: Oh, okay. The Flickr link was still working when I posted the question. The image is categorised as "Paintings by Jackson Pollock". From the description I gather the image is a black and white photo of Moon Vessel (dated 1945). So, the image is certainly not of a portait of Abraham Lincoln. Do you know if the painting is in the public domain? Mikalagrand (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Jackson Pollock died in 1956, which is "only" 66 years ago. The picture on the linked page you sent me states a copyright notice:
Recordings that were published prior to 1923 entered the public domain on January 1, 2022. Recordings that were published from 1923 through 1946 are copyrighted for a period of 100 years after first publication. Recordings that were published from 1947 through 1956 are copyrighted for a period of 110 years after first publication. Recordings that were published after 1956 and first fixed prior to February 15, 1972 will enter the public domain on February 15, 2067. These copyright terms for pre-1972 recordings apply regardless of any formalities (copyright notice, registration with the US copyright office, or copyright renewal.)
Although, this applies specifically for music. I couldn't find any information here on Commons that would determine when paintings with copyright notice enter public domain. I would simply assume 70 years after the author's death, which will be frankly just 4 years later, which will be in 2026. If the same rules that apply for music also apply for any other work, then year of publication is 1945, so the copyright would expire in 2045.
I'm no lawyer, so I can only assume based on what I can read in online sources. I am also not a resident of United States, which also contributes to the fact I don't know about majority of U.S. laws, notably copyright laws. I know a little bit about Fair Use, but the rest of the copyright laws? Without researching anything, basically zero knowledge. So you'd better just ask someone who has greater understanding and knowledge of how copyright works in United States. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 15:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Under U.S. law, the Jackson Pollock painting should be protected for 95 years from "publication", which in this case effectively means public display, which presumably was almost immediate. See Commons:Hirtle chart. - Jmabel ! talk15:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Someone has agreed to release their work under a CCL, but they do not want their watermark cropped or removed in any way. Would it be a problem to have it remain? If so, is there a template of some sort that would let others know not to remove it? Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
I sent an email to WiKi last week in order to seek for permission for using my photography work on a public figure page. Sadly, my application was turned down and I was required to provide more information.
However, I am the original creator of the portrait and I have no idea what sort of information I am supposed to provide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LamlamFong (talk • contribs) 13:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
@Kai3952: That's been pretty broken lately. I don't have any help for you, but I've had the same problem. Does anyone know if there is a Phabricator bug report about this? - Jmabel ! talk15:37, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
BTW, interactive history browser may do the job for you, or simply go to the history summary page of said file and select range between the last vandalism and the last legitimate edit, then press "Revert", it should revert all the changes the vandal has done even between multiple edits. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 09:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Unknown parameter removal via Flickr2Commons
I used the Flickr2Commons to transfer a number of public-domain images from the U.S. Army Cadet Command Flickr account. All of them have the prefix "U.S. Army Cadet Command Change of Command Ceremony", so for those helping to fix the problem, they should be under those filenames here. During the uploads of the Army images, an unknown parameter was added to the File Information template (Notification: Error in {{Information}<ǃ---(prevent template from appearing)-->} template: unknown parameter "1".). I searched the parameter in Edit mode but couldn't find the issue.
If someone can see it, could they assist in fixing the issue or help identify it to me? I don't see it.
P.S. Upon initial upload, the aforementioned error was already present; however, the Creative Commons 1.0. preset copyright tag was not acceptable as a public domain justification. Hence I substituted it with the PD-USGov-Military-Army copyright tag, which seems equally appropriate given that in the file metadata, the images were produced by the U.S. Army Cadet Command Public Affairs Office, under the U.S. Army. Unsure if this is related to the issue above, but here it is just in case. Thank you. SuperWIKI (talk) 12:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
I thought I know English quite well to understand a written and spoken word and even communicate. Turns out not so much, because I don't know what you meant. Can anyone please translate this sentence for me? I would like to help, yet it's very hard if you don't know what it meant to say. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 16:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Michael Caruso musician photo - profile wikipedia picture
There is an editor/administrator coming after profiles that have been here for years. questioning and deleting photos etc. One of the photos on Tamara Champlin's biography may have been questionable credentials, but the photo on Michael Caruso (musicians) profile was uploaded by its photographer Luani Kologi who is the owner of "Fragments" handle.
On Danielle Nicole (musician) biography there is a problem with the Concord Records photo. Please look into this and any help you can give me I would appreciate.
Here is the reply I received: @Paulhus15: I didn't remove the photo. I only asked about it at c:COM:VPC#File:Michael Anthony Caruso.jpg. The photo was tagged for speedy deletion by another editor named c:User:Jeff G. (see c:User talk:Fragmentsforart#File:Michael Anthony Caruso.jpg) and then subsequently deleted by a Commons administrator named c:User:Túrelio. Once the file was deleted from Commons, it was removed by a bot from the Wikipedia article. If you feel an error was made, you can always post a message explaining why at c:User talk:Túrelio. For reference, though, the fact that a file has been used for a long time doesn't mean it's was uploaded under an acceptable or verifiable license; it could just as easily mean that no body bothered to check the file's licensing for a long time. The same image can essentially be seen used online as the cover art of a single by Caruso that was released at least two years prior to photo being uploaded to Commons, and almost always in such cases more formal verification is needed for such a file to be kept. So, if the photographer who took the photo had previously allowed it to be used for the cover art before they uploaded it to Commons, all they will likely need to do is follow the instructions given in c:COM:Licensing images: when do I contact VRT? and the file can be restored after VRT verification. Paulhus15 (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
can i simply go here and put this back on the profile or should i have her re upload. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael Anthony Caruso.jpg. Paulhus15 (talk) 21:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
As I answered you on my talkpage, I have temporarily undeleted the image (so it's back in the article on :en) and put it into the above linked DR. Everything should be discussed there. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The editor/administrator referred to by the OP in their first post above is me and the reply they're referring to can be found at en:User talk:Marchjuly#Michael Caruso musician photo. The other file they're referring to is a file uploaded locally to English Wikipedia as non-free content and thus has nothing to do with Commons. I'm not an administrator on English Wikipedia or Commons; so, I can't delete files. Since the OP has stated they've been editing for a long time and understand the various policies of both Commons and English Wikipedia, one would assume that understood that only administrators have the ability to delete files; if they didn't, now they do. A similar post to this was also asked at en:WP:HD#MIchael Caruso Musician photo where myself and some others responded. For the OP's future reference, issues with Commons files generally need to discussed and resolved on Commons, while issues with files uploaded locally to English WIkipedia generally need to be discussed and resolved there. There's a bit of overlapping between Commons and English Wikipedia, and lots of similarities between the two when it comes to policies related to file licensing; however, there are also some important differences which is why its best to typically discuss a file where it's been uploaded. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
And if it's from 2007, why did you give today as the date?
Вы тоже говорите на русском!!!??? Это хорошо!!! Раньше на российском и украинском телевидении была такая телепередача, называлась она «Властелин горы» (2007 год эфира), в ней принимал участие этот человек, что на моём фото с флагом Украины, это каскадёр и мастер спорта Украины международного класса по боевым искусствам Александр Литвиненко (творческий псевдоним у него «Alex Lee»), он 1979 года рождения, тогда ему на съёмках этой передачи в Монженевре, Франции было в 2007 28 лет, съёмки были в январе 2007, ему тогда ещё пока не было 28, только 27, я даже координаты в Монженевре на фото в информации добавил, когда их открываешь, в картах высвечивается этот курорт, Вы когда то посещали категорию «Alexander Litvinenko (martial artist)»? Xabib Malinka (talk) 05:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Jmabel, можете удалить мой файл, я его неправильно создал, вот он:↓
Название — Игры патриотов-3 (2006).jpg ↓
Дело в том, что я создал правильный файл под названием «Alex Lee — Игры патриотов-3 (2006)» и этот файл ненужный, который имеет название просто «Игры патриотов-3 (2006)» является его дубликатом, удалите его, пожалуйста! Я сам не могу, я уже пробовал быстрое удаление, но ничего не идёт! :(
Вот правильный файл без ошибок:↓
Название — Alex Lee — Игры патриотов-3 (2006).jpg ↓
Donald Trung tried repeatedly to convince me that there is no problem with my uploaded photos, but I told him that my photos was reported by Beeblebrox for a HOST violation at COM:AN/U. It's taken a long time to explain why did I choose not to upload. Maybe I wasn't clear enough, I explain here again:
(1) Beeblebrox has not discussed with me before reporting my photos. He seems to intend for the admin to block me in order to stop uploading. As soon as I feel it's a threat, I will to do other than stick to my gut and keep moving forward.
(2) When I'm explaining to Beeblebrox how my photos be used for any educational purpose, it's actually aggravating a conflict. I felt if I tried to argue and explain the rationale behind each photo, then things would have gotten worse. In the past four years since I've already been blocked many times for the same behavior, I suppose I cannot argue with anyone. Not to mention the admin on Chinese-language Wikipedia has indefinitely blocked me. I'm afraid that the best (and maybe only) option in this case is to give up on defending myself. For me, that means stopping to upload any photos.
(3) Beeblebrox said: "This is Commons, not Google street view." It really hurts me that he seem to think that I am like "Google's street view tool". I never thought it would happen to me. When someone else uploads a photo they took, only I am being blamed, which indicates that there is something wrong with me. I could make myself do a lot of things on Commons, but I wouldn't make myself look like Google's street view tool. If his intention was to stop me from uploading, then he did.
However, Donald Trung said: "I don't think that your uploads will get you blocked if you do some basic evaluations to keep the near-duplicates out." If you look carefully at the above (1)(2)(3), you will realize that the problem is that Beeblebrox's behaviors to show undisguised hostility to me, instead of the photo itself. I just know that it's not right to violate the policies and to argue with people who correct me. Personally, I've never heard of anyone being blocked for not uploading a photo. The 2000+ photos are in my hands, I have the right to choose whether to upload it or not. Anyone should not cross the line before being uploaded to Commons. Since Donald Trung always insisted on me to continue/finish uploading, I request a dispute resolution. See more details here.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
I'll give you a clue. File inclusion doesn't have a parameter that would take a name of a page, I think. Link to a page is made by using a parameter link=. However, I'm not sure how it works for fullurl links, I'll have to look into a documentation for it. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 06:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Fixed it:
<div style="margin:1.5em;">[[File:Red button.png|200px|link={{fullurl:{{ns:3}}:{{#titleparts:{{BASEPAGENAME}}|1|1}}|action=edit§ion=new&preloadtitle=Trouted&preload=Template%3ATroutme/preload}}|Trout user {{PAGENAME}}]]</div>
I guess this isn't related to this template, is it? Make a new section and try again. And please, tell us what exactly you need in order for us to help you. Unfortunately, my prophecy ball just malfunctioned. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 06:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I want to upload my translation into Turkish as you did in Russian. But I could not figure out how, I need some help. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AyseBkaymaz (talk • contribs) 12:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The Cognitive Bias Codex. I don't know how this entry ended up here. I have actually post it on the discussion section of Russian translation of the Cognitive Bias Codex. I have translated the codex using JavaScript and I want to publish the svg. AyseBkaymaz (talk) 15:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
U.S. Department of Transportation: Model Inventory of Roadway Elements
Hello, very inexperienced in this realm, but would it be possible to upload a document from the Department of Transportation on roadway standards in the U.S.? I am interested because I would like to use a picture on another wiki (wiki.openstreetmap for the OpenStreetMap community) to help describe how to measure roadways. There are a few pictures in here that are useful to my explanation. Since this is a federal document, I can use/upload however I would like? Thanks.(Ivangiesen (talk) 01:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC))
Edit: Link to document is here: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/rsdp/downloads/fhwasa17048.pdf, is this a document that would better be uploaded to a different wikimedia project? Wikibooks maybe?
It's a great question, because the document was actually written by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. and the University of North Carolina. I've cataloged a lot of these at work, I never considered that the documents or their images could be uploaded to Commons. Prburley (talk)
Upload of a image from a website (that is gone)
Article: SchleFaZ
I want to upload one of the cocktail cards, which were created for personal use. Those where stored and released on the site http://schlefaz.de which is now dead and redirected to https://tele5.de/mediathek/schlefaz/.
On this site are no more Coktail cards, just the recipe.
@LAZA74: You are NOT allowed to upload images from the Internet without a formal written permission from the copyright holder, or an explicit free license at the source. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Well, technically yes, since it doesn't violate copyright. But it might be against conventions of the wiki you want to use the link in. Bear in mind that the content on the wiki is still to be served under a free license, and if you link to a copyrighted material from somewhere in the text, it's actually against the stylistic code of wiki. External links should be in their own separate section on the page where only those links exist in a form of a list. Also, embedding the copyrighted image from an external link to a page is not only against the conventions of wiki, but also might be considered as copyright infridgement, because technically it is linking to a legitimate source, but the link is used in such way it creates an illusion the image is actually coming from the wiki, which is in fact copyright infridgement. So while it is possible to link copyright protected media from a wiki site, do it in External links section only please and do not embed the media directly to display on the wiki page. If you have a choice of linking the direct media or the page the media can be accessed from, prefer the page. That way the owner can be actually supported in a way the page specifies. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 13:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
I think they can. Specifically the new Enforcement Guidelines make it possible to enforce UCoC when something like that happens off-wiki, with certain limitations, and that is if it happened on a third party platform in a space that was created for a Wikimedia project (like on an IRC chat in the WMF project's channel). Unfortunately, UCoC doesn't apply to a space that is completely out of control of Wikimedia Foundation or any community that maintains one or more Wikimedia projects. It depends on who harrased you and where. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 12:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Often the harassment happens on facebook, PTT, etc off-wiki places. They're smart people, so they know how to avoid WMF sanctions. I'm a healthy person, but they keep claiming to anyone that I have Asperger's syndrome. Because they complain about I have always doing something to make them displeased. Especially, they say that my behavior is excessively follow the Commons' policies. I see that everyone here doing the same thing as me, so I don't understand what's wrong with following the Commons' policies. Why am I the only one being attacked personally? Living under the pressure of constant harassment can trigger anxiety and depression, which makes it harder to think clearly and focus on what matters every. Therefore, I had to give up several daily tasks such as: to nominate files for deletion, the file description was found to be wrong and to tell uploader about it. I contacted many people for help but no one respond (including WMF) . Did they really not care about editors who are being harassed off-wiki?--Kai3952 (talk) 16:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm afraid but that is not something we here can do anything about, nor is the WMF in a position to enforce anything completely off-wiki like random Facebook sites. However, they might at least have offered you advice how to proceed. From my point of view you may want to contact your local police because this sounds like offensive behaviour and slander. De728631 (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
My account on Chinese-language Wikipedia has been blocked by the Taiwanese admin. They told me it was a NLT violation, so now I can't contact the police. I'm really stuck and don't know how to help myself.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
@Kai3952: While there is such policy, obviously some actions are exceptioned. One of the most obvious exceptions is protection against dangerous threats and continuous harrassment. Where the enforcement of UCoC fails, legal aid may come in handy. If you feel you're really globally targetted by various global admins, contact WMF Trust & Safety Team. That is essentially equal to the legal action as T&S Team is essentially the legal team of WMF specifically for this purpose. They're going to do necessary legal steps for you. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 19:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The maximum retrospective period of Taiwan is six months, and therefore cannot to pursue legal responsibility for all previous harassment. The Taiwanese admin had the massive Taiwanese wiki-editor's support behind them. Not only did they not deal with the harassment, but also they accused me of harassing users and going against the spirit of Wikipedia. This proves that it's useless to ask them for help. Ironically, when I realized that the harassment comes from off-wiki places, the NLT policy says I can't take legal action against them, that's why I'm stuck there. As far as I know, all harassment comes from a rumor in August 2019. Reke spread rumors about I have Asperger's syndrome based on his feelings, especially he is acting as a staff member in the Wikimedia Taiwan, which means that his words represented the WMF, so those who displeased with me believed him. And that not only caused me a lot of stress, but lose the trust of the Taiwanese community. Most of Taiwanese who harassing me are different from the account name they registered on Commons, it becomes very difficult for gathering evidence against them violated Wiki rules. However, I can know from their complaints, they know a lot about what I do, so I assert that they are active on Commons. If I really did something wrong, they should to resolve issues through the normal channels, and I'm happy to accept any advice that would be beneficial to Commons, but they didn't. What should I do if you think UCoC can help me? How should I contact them?--Kai3952 (talk) 09:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
As I said. Contact Trust & Safety team, that is the highest end on UCoC that should be able to resolve these issues. Wikimedia servers are not hosted in eighter China or Taiwan, they are hosted in United States, and all Wikimedia projects are international, including local language projects, that means any issues that happen on Wiki sites hosted by WMF transcend international borders. Taiwan as far as I know isn't part of China (regardless of what Chinese government says), they're independent country and what happened here is they assaulted someone in another country. I know that China and Taiwan do not really go along very well, that sadly includes also most citizens. They essentially let politics influence their decision making, which is unacceptable on sites like Wikipedia. Ask WMF Trust & Safety Team for help and specifically ask for an independent judgement of someone who doesn't have anything that ties them to China or Taiwan (any kind of relatives, any kind of citizenship in eighter of these countries, etc. You need an independent jury that won't be influenced by one or another side, and that is best if someone from a third country comes to judge the case. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 10:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
The environment I'm in at the moment is Taiwan, not China. Actually, my question is that the Trust and Safety page gives me three options: cawikimedia.org, emergencywikimedia.org, legal-reportswikimedia.org, so I don't know which one should I choose.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I've sourced a photo of three US National Medal of Science winners together, from their medal ceremony. (It's public domain, taken from a government website.) Two of the people in the photo have Wikipedia pages that lack a picture of them, and this one photo would actually provide a great profile photo for each of them if it was cropped. In which case, I'd have to create two different cropped versions--one for one person, and one for the other. How should I go about uploading? Is it preferred to upload the original photo (featuring all 3 people) and then alter it? Or should I create two cropped versions on my computer and upload them separately as two different files? (In which case, what do I do with the original? I assume it's still valuable to include in Commons.) I just don't want to make a mess with the upload. Thanks! IbIANTiA (talk) 23:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
@IbIANTiA: I would suggest uploading the original and then also uploading each of the cropped versions, so all three versions would be on Commons, each under a different name. If you use CropTool to do the cropping then it'll automatically add templates to the various descriptions of the files indicate their relationships. --bjh21 (talk) 23:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
@IbIANTiA: Of course, you will still have to choose appropriate names for each file & do the descriptions & categories correctly. But if you start with the original, CropTool will correctly identify the derivative works as such. - Jmabel ! talk03:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
How to add a topic?
Hi, I want to add 'Hatnur Dam' so that if anyone searched images of Hatnur Dam, he can easily find all the images on one location on Wikimedia commons. How I can do this ? How to find a photo on this site ?What is categories? How to add them? What are their benifits ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Success think (talk • contribs) 07:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
@Success think: Categorization is utilized using [[Category:Name of category]] syntax on files description pages, categories may have or lack their respective page. Category that lacks a page still works as a category, the link is grey though and only shows alphabetical order of subcategories and categorized pages and files. Category with a descriptive page shows with a blue link. For searching, there is the search bar in top right corner, you can essentially write Hatnur Dam into it and press search. It will search in common namespaces (main namespace, category namespace, file namespace), if you want to find a specific category, you can press to search and then limit the search results to the category instead. If you know for sure you want to search for a category, you can skip the search results page settings and simply prepend your search phrase with Category:, so it's like this: Category:Hatnur Dam. Searching for pages and categories is rather easy. If you want to link to category, but not use it, the link syntax for category is like this: [[:Category:Name of category]] (notice the preceding colon before the category keyword, that prevents the link from functioning like categorization of the page it was included in, without it, it's not a category link, it's the category usage). Category:Hatnur Dam doesn't seem to have a dedicated page, but it is still possible that images are categorized under this specific category. In fact, there is one image. I've found some other images of Hatnur Dam that weren't categorized in Hatnur Dam category, simply by searching Hatnur Dam among image files. Try this link: Special:MediaSearch/image/Hatnur Dam. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 10:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Rights to create 20 wikimedia accounts for a workshop
Hi everyone,
I work for wikimedia france and am having à workshop on commons with around 20 newbies. Is there a way I could get a bypass to allow them to create their accounts all in the same place ? Sorry, it's been a while since I've organised à training session IRL.
Note that both require a meta:Bureaucrat to assign this user group to you.
In enwiki, we have en:Wikipedia:Event coordinator that serves those who are conducting workshops. I originally started in the Account creator group & was subsequently moved into the Event coordinator group. To my knowledge, this is unique to enwiki. Peaceray (talk) 16:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
I had uploaded a bunch of pictures to the commons but I had not gotten permission from the photographer, I have since received permission by email from him but the pictures have since been deleted and it won't let me reupload them, is there someway i can send the permission to have the undeleted and reuploaded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newbrunswick1 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello there, when browsing media, I'm frequently struggling with the following problem. Some contributors do a bit too much of a good thing when organizing their media. Example: Category:Timber framed houses in Hennef (Sieg) includes 101 other categories, with the vast majority of them including only 1 image. In order to browse those images you seem to have to click through all the folders. At least that is what I do. Is there a more efficient way to see them all at one glance? --Stilfehler (talk) 19:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
If each of these is a separately designated cultural heritage monument then it may actually be OK to have a category for each, and if so this is one of those situations where two reasonable goals may conflict. But I agree that it makes it hard to browse. Someone could create a gallery page with one picture of each. - Jmabel ! talk00:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
I see what you mean. What I was really hoping for was probably a tool that would auto-generate an ad hoc gallery, based on any specified category. Thanks, --Stilfehler (talk) 23:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:PetScan can list files in a category tree, or files that are contained in all of two or more category trees. It doesn't show the images though. I think it would be quite easy to build a tool that would also show thumbnails of the files, but I don't know about any. –LPfi (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Typically, it is easiest if that public institution indicates the license on its own site or on a page (such as it's official Flickr page) that is clearly under their control. Then Commons can give that as a source for the image and license. - Jmabel ! talk15:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes. The other option is to write an e-mail according to instructions on Commons:VRT (which may be a bit convoluted in some cases). However, first make sure the institution owns the needed copyrights (or that the files are in the public domain). A common problem is that the institution only owns the photo, not the copyright to it, another that it has negotiated only limited rights to use the photo. –LPfi (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hacked
Can someone please help me?? My wife is having an affair and modified pages I believe on here to block from from certain sites. I have never used this before and I’m having a hard time finding and identifying pages she changed!! If anyone can help me I’d really appreciate I have no idea what to do and thanks in advance!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worm1271 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Just change your password and check Special:MyContributions. You might want to register an e-mail address through which you can get a new password in case it gets changed by somebody else (or you forget it). Make sure you log out before you leave a computer somebody else may have access to. And use individual accounts also on your home computer. –LPfi (talk) 20:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't believe the OP is here in good faith. I've just blocked them on en.wp for disruptive edits, because they labeled all their content edits as "grammar" when in fact they were just breaking stuff, which is also what they are doing here. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
To be fair, if what the OP is telling is truth, it may be someone (their wife) that gained access to their account. Will they have a way to appeal after they restore their access to their account? I do understand this is quite difficult situation and it is always good measure to ban a hacked account. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 09:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes, there is a way to appeal: Blocked accounts can write on their own user talk page (unless this is also blocked) and specifically ask for unblocking and give reasons. --C.Suthorn (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
To be honest: I unblocked them, but then it went on as before. So I blocked them again to prevent further disruption. --Achim55 (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Well, one way could be to check out COM:TOO#India, and it says following:
India seems to have a similar threshold of originality as the US Courts, called Modicum of Creativity. Older cases may have similar thresholds of originality to the UK Courts called Sweat of the brow but this is no longer applied.
Robbin Singh has written an essay on the subject that may be useful.
@Maren Jackwerth Ich nehme an, es geht um das Bild File:Düsseldorfer Siegel.jpg. Das Bild existiert natürlich weiterhin. Das neue Bild hast Du ja bereits hochgeladen. Das hat keine Auswirkungen auf das alte Bild. Im Artikel in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia kannst Du das Bild einfach austauschen. Es gibt aber ein Problem: Bei allen drei von Dir hochgeladenen Bildern, gibst Du an, diese selbst erstellt zu haben. In zwei Bildern wird aber ardea-alba.de als Quelle angegeben und auf dieser Website gibt es zwar eine Christa Jackwerth, aber keine Maren Jackwerth. Ich habe die drei Bilder markiert, damit Du bei VRT eine Permission nachreichen kannst. Die Anleitung findest Du auf den Bildbeschreibungsseiten. C.Suthorn (talk) 11:54, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Care to be a bit more specific? Are you asking about a photo, a gallery, a category, a Wikipedia article...? - Jmabel ! talk22:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright help regarding [[:]]
The image was uploaded by the actress Mirnaa Menon itself in her twitter account. I have mentioned the source in the file. Licensing issue is there and I didn’t understand what that mean. I uploaded the file which is from a social media of actress itslef. Please help me out.Paavamjinn (talk) 19:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Only "free" photos are allowed to be uploaded. For contemporary photos such as this, it means we need a suitable licence from the photographer, such as CC-BY-SA. Was there any indication of a free licence at her twitter account or by the photo? Otherwise it probably needs to be deleted. –LPfi (talk) 19:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Upload images from my own collection of antique labels.
I am the founder and curator of Fabled Labels® Archives, which is a collection of circa 1872-1920 Louisiana trade labels. I am the person who discovered these labels back in 1975 at a now defunct New Orleans label printer founded in the 1870s. I made original labels available to both the Louisiana State Museum and the Historical New Orleans Collection as well as other prominent collections. The archive has been the subject of numerous publications. You may read the history here
I wished to upload one of the labels in my collection because it is relevant to a Wikipedia page I'm editing on the history of Brittany, Louisiana where I grew up and now live. It was a strawberry crate label from c. 1920. Brittany was once strawberry country. You would not permit me to upload the image even though I own the label and the photograph I took of it, and it has been in the public domain for decades.
@SharonDunnDinkinsDymond: Hi, and welcome. I am sorry to inform you that you have triggered Special:AbuseFilter/153 by trying to cross-wiki upload a smaller (<50,000 bytes or <2,000,000 pixels) jpg image as a new user. The image you tried to upload is smaller, and you indicated it's your own work. Usually when someone uploads a smaller image, it is a copyright violation taken from the web. If you made the image yourself, please upload the full-size original of it per COM:HR, including EXIF metadata. If you did not make the image, please see Commons:Licensing for why we can't accept it as-is, and have the image photographer / designer license it on their official website or social media, or send the image and permission via VRT with a carbon copy to you. If you can't get a compliant license, the image may still be uploaded to English Wikipedia in compliance with en:WP:F because we don't allow Fair Use here. If you use our Upload Wizard instead, you should be able to avoid that filter. See also COM:SIGN, COM:DW, and COM:EVID. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me20:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: "If you made the image yourself…" doesn't seem to be to the point, it looks like she is talking about a public-domain image.
Is there anything that needs to be noted when uploading images created by two individuals? Both agree to have the images on Wikimedia Commons under CC BY-SA. I did look through the list of past questions and did not see this type of situation addressed, or missed the answer. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Audiopraming (talk • contribs) 19:36, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
@Audiopraming: (1) Make sure that the authorship is correctly credited. (2) There are some possible further issues. Is the uploader one of the two individuals, or are these both other people? - Jmabel ! talk05:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
They are are co-creators. One of the individuals will be uploading the images, but they want to be sure to be inclusive regarding authorship. Audiopraming (talk) 21:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
@Audiopraming: should be fine, but I'd recommend that the other individual drop an email as described at COM:VRT to indicate that that they have approved the uploading that will be happening on their behalf. Then the team there can issue a ticket to make it clear that this is all in order. - Jmabel ! talk00:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Buenos dias, estoy queriendo subir un documento en mp3 con licencia cc-by 3.0 en el marco de la acción archivos en vigilia. Soy la directora del archivo histórico de la UNLP. Necesitaría el permiso correspondiente. saludos cordiales, Laura Casareto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lali (ArchivoUNLP) (talk • contribs) 14:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
@Lali (ArchivoUNLP): Si el archivo tiene la licencia correcta, simplemente puede cargarlo e indicar la licencia correcta. No se necesita ningún otro "permiso". Así que no estoy seguro de que lo que Vd. dice sea un problema o lo que necesita Vd.. ¿Podría por favor ser más específico? - Jmabel ! talk15:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
@Jmabel: Filter 192 does not allow certain uploads, such as her MP3 files, except for users in certain groups. I don't know what workaround is intended to be used. There is the additional problem that several of her uploads have been deleted as missing VRT permission. Seems help is needed. –LPfi (talk) 19:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
@Jmabel: The issue with the abuse filter stopping MP3 uploads remains. Should Laura Casareto be given sufficient rights explicitly? –LPfi (talk) 07:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
@LPfi: The thing is, only the VRT people can establish that she really is who she says she is. But I guess I'm willing to assume good faith and extend "autopatrol" here. To be honest, I've never done that before. - Jmabel ! talk15:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Then she should contact the VRT, but uploading can be done more or less independently from that procedure, and it may be easier to have the files uploaded, if she wants to point to them in the corespondence. –LPfi (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Error uploading file.
Good morning. I am trying to upload images of my authorship (photos) from my computer and I get an error. The photo was in color and he changes it to black and white... I received a message that the file was placed on a black list... I appreciate your help please. It is my first article that I want to upload. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viruaca2022 (talk • contribs) 10:49, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
@Viruaca2022: There are some restrictions on files that may be uploaded from the visual editor on Wikipedia (I assume that was what you tried). The upload may succeed if you instead use the file upload item in the left margin on Commons (such as at this page). However, these restrictions are in place for a reason.
It seems you tried to upload a low-resolution version of the photo. We do want as large resolution as possible. I cannot see the file you tried to upload, but is it your own portrait photograph, or is it a photograph of an existing portrait?
If there are doubts about the authorship you might have to provide more details for it not to be deleted; don't claim "own work" if you photographed a work of somebody else. I don't know what blacklist might have been involved; has somebody else maybe uploaded the same photo before?
The log entry for your try at an upload seems to suggest the file was coded in colour, but the filename suggested it was in black and white. Anyway, the image you saw may not have been the final image, as the upload was disallowed. Try again here at Commons, and then we can easier clear up any problems.
Which is the one pointed to by the upload link in the left margin. Your explicit link works equally well, but can be difficult to find or remember for future uses. –LPfi (talk) 07:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
subir imagen
Buenas noches, intento colocar una imagen que es fruto de mi trabajo pero aparece un cartel poniendo en duda la licencia. He colocado la imagen en commons pero aún así no me permite utilizarla para ilustrar un apartado en wikipedia. Segun el cartel debo ponerme en contacto con un administrador para informarle lo que ocurre, pero no sé donde encontrar dicho adminsitrador. Ayuda. Gracias! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uaph (talk • contribs) 23:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
I've been doing some galleries, lately, and found them pretty enjoyable to do. However, I'm really perplexed about some aspects of the culture, mainly what to do the wikidata infobox. So there's a Category page and a Gallery page, and from what I've found, it seems the infobox ought to have its place in both. When I started, I mainly emulated what I saw from the pages of american presidents. So I put the infobox on both pages, but Pi-bot, and some other contributors, revert those changes not only here, but on the wikidata article itself. So I'm quite confused as to how to proceed here. Furthermore, there's the question of wikidata. There's a link we can insert in a section called multilingual sites. From what I've seen of many articles there, it's the gallery page that should be linked there (if it exists), not the category page. There too, edits are being reverted, because it's quite frankly not clear what belongs where and how. So yeah, maybe someone can explain me how it all works so I don't make any more mistakes. Thanks a lot!--Danalieth (talk) 04:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
There was an argument, when Wikidata was introduced, about how to handle Commons categories. I don't know whether there was a final consensus. Could somebody point to a guideline page on this? Or is it just about individual editors following their impression on how this should be done? One issue is that there may be several galleries for one category, e.g. in different languages (this last is not common, but illustrates the problem). The main issue is that for most items, the category is more useful than any existing gallery, but I think the Wikidata folks hold that as less important. –LPfi (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
@Maksimus15945632587: Привет и добро пожаловать. С сожалением сообщаю вам, что вы вызвали Special:AbuseFilter/153, пытаясь кросс-вики загрузить меньший (<50 000 байт или <2 000 000 пикселей) jpg-логотип в качестве нового пользователя. Логотип, который вы пытались загрузить, меньше, и вы указали, что это ваша собственная работа. Обычно, когда кто-то загружает логотип меньшего размера, это нарушение авторских прав, взятое из Интернета. Пожалуйста, загрузите его полноразмерный оригинал на COM:HR/ru, включая метаданные EXIF, но как есть он может быть сочтен слишком сложным, чтобы быть под TOO/ru в стране происхождения, поэтому вам может понадобиться опубликовать соответствующее COM:L/ru разрешение на такие работы на вашем официальном веб-сайте или в социальных сетях или отправить разрешение через VRT/ru. Кроме того, любое растровое изображение будет выглядеть неровным при увеличении, поэтому вы также можете загрузить версию svg. Если вы не можете получить соответствующую лицензию, логотип все равно может быть загружен в англоязычную Википедию в соответствии с en:WP:F, потому что мы не разрешаем добросовестное использование здесь. Если вместо этого вы используете наш мастер загрузки, вы сможете обойти этот фильтр. Кроме того, я не увидел на https://tmholding.ru свободной лицензии, поэтому пометил File:Трансмашхолдинг логотип.jpg как нарушение авторских прав. См. также COM:SIGN/ru.
Hi, and welcome. I am sorry to inform you that you have triggered Special:AbuseFilter/153 by trying to cross-wiki upload a smaller (<50,000 bytes or <2,000,000 pixels) jpg logo as a new user. The logo you tried to upload is smaller, and you indicated it's your own work. Usually when someone uploads a smaller logo, it's a copyright violation taken from the web. Please upload the full-size original of it per COM:HR, including EXIF metadata, but as-is it may be judged too complex to be under TOO in the country of origin, so you may need to post COM:L compliant permission for such works on your official website or social media presence or send permission via VRT. Also, any raster image will look jaggy when scaled up, so you may want to upload an svg version, too. If you can't get a compliant license, the logo may still be uploaded to English Wikipedia in compliance with en:WP:F because we don't allow Fair Use here. If you use our Upload Wizard instead, you should be able to avoid that filter. In addition, I saw no free license on https://tmholding.ru , so I tagged File:Трансмашхолдинг логотип.jpg as a copyright violation. See also COM:SIGN. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me14:38, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Я обращаюсь ко всем тем, кто удалил мои работы — фото Александра Литвиненко и Кристины Асмус, зачем вы их удалили, это же мои собственные работы, ну и что, что они с другими авторскими правами, я их просто так для красоты и значимости добавил, я так долго старался, а вы мне сделали назло! Ну-ка быстро все это верните, иначе пожалуюсь на вас админам! Xabib Malinka (talk) 16:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Вообще-то это же не вы удалили их, а Túrelio, передайте ему от меня, что если он не восстановит мои фото, получит жалобу от админов, вот ему прямо так и скажи, не бойся, я тебя прошу, передай! Хорошо?! Xabib Malinka (talk) 06:25, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
wiki loves monuments 2022
Hola, quisiera saber como puedo hacer para hacer participar a mi país Uruguay?, gracias - Hello, I would like to know how I can do to make my country Uruguay participate?, thanks
Fabio Alvarez - imagenatural.fa@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.133.213.147 (talk) 17:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello ! I'm actually creating the page of an actor (Baptiste Anquez), and I uploaded a picture of him taken by a photographer.
I have the autorisation from the actor, and from the photographer, but I don't know where to put those and if I really need to do it.
Do I need to add anything else on the description ? Here is the link of the picture : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Baptiste_Anquez_2022_by_Jules_Vast.png
Sorry if I was not clear, thanks in advance for your response ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord HN (talk • contribs) 19:58, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Would you mind taking a look at this again when you get the chance? The situation might've changed since the OP posted here. The Flickr source provided for the file shows it has been released under a PD license, but the Flickr account is only a day old. This might possibly mean two things: (1) the copyright holder relicensed the photo after your post (2) the photo actually didn't originate with the Flickr account. If PD license is acceptable, then the file probably needs to be re-licensed accordingly. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
When reviewing Flickr files, as I have done for many years, is that new Flickr users with very few images who suddenly change the licence to one we accept after getting a warning, always appears suspect. It's probably academic because the article this was intended for fr:Baptiste_Anquez has been deleted as not meeting the frwiki eligibility, which I suspect (if I translate it correctly) is their way of saying the sources for this person are insufficient to prove notability. So in addition, if its licence is suspect and it won't be used, it may well be considered OOS. However, if the copyright holder can provide a verifiable permission then I'm happy to keep it. Ww2censor (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
flickr2commons trouble with videos
I'm trying to upload this Flickr album using F2C but it keeps telling me that 'File extension ".mov" does not match the detected MIME type of the file (image/jpeg).'--Trade (talk) 21:36, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
You will either have to recode the videos to webm (with ffmpeg for example) or you can use video2commons to recode and upload. "mov" is not a free format and not allowed at commons. --C.Suthorn (talk) 13:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
using these images in hard copy books for sale
Lots of info here on rules for posting and linking pictures, but couldn't find any info on whether you are allowed to download the images and put them into a book that will then be published in hard copy and sold. Is this allowed? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.114.128.34 (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Not that hard, I think. You probably want to restrict yourself to a manageable number of licences, so that checking what they require doesn't get too cumbersome. Being able to use the images in books is one rationale about why commercial use must be allowed for files on Commons. You need to reserve a couple of pages for attributions, licences and links, and if you process the images before printing, you may need to put those versions on the net somewhere, available at least as long as you distribute the book and some time thereafter. –LPfi (talk) 12:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
I do NOT have the technical ability to trim a sound file. I want to trim down to the first 2 seconds of File:Sydney tram 18 - 2016-02-14.ogg so there is no dead space afterwords. So in other words I just want the first 2 seconds of this file. Can someone help me to do this. I want to place this new 2 second file at the end of Legacy in the Wikipedia article Walter Hunt (inventor). Thanks for this technical help. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I want to upload a logo of the Swedish Social Democratic Party, as it is a logo I don't think I can upload it. Is there any way I can upload it so it can be used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KonstapelKatt (talk • contribs) 13:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
@KonstapelKatt: Definitely copyrighted, so unless there is a free license available it can't be on Commons. en-wiki, unlike Commons, allows non-free use in situations like this, and has a copy local to en-wiki. Any other wiki that allows non-free use can do the same. - Jmabel ! talk16:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
POTD caption on main page, "Four ladies wearing a yukata", reads as if one garment is being shared by four people. Perhaps someone would like to change "a yukata" to "yukatas", as I do not have permission to edit it. ITookSomePhotos (talk) 22:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Could you tell me if the following document, can be considered as belonging to the public domain, and can be used to copy images for Wimedia? P. BOURRELLY. "RECHERCHES SUR LES CHRYSOPHYCEEES" printed in France, in 1957: see here online. Thank you for your response. GerardGiraud (talk) 23:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Rename erroneously-named photos descriptions category and etc.
hello,
I have noticed that two wikimedia photos (not mine, but on a subject which interests me) are wrongly named, wrongly described, and wrongly categorised (with the same wrong name).
I realise that I could do this manually/slowly one line at a time, or request the author to do same, (or an administrator) but out of curiosity What is the simplest procedure that can be used to rename
the two photos
AND their descriptions
AND their wikimedia category (also wrongly labelled)
AND their related wikidata entries
AND anything else that might be needed .. .. in a minimum number of steps and without upsetting the logical relations between all these items ?
If you want to do it in a minimum of steps, open them for wikitext editing, add {{Rename | new name.ext| 3|reason}} (e.g. at the top of the page), where "new name.ext" is to be substituted by the corrected name, "3" stands for "to correct obvious errors", and "reason" should be substituted by an explanation, short if obvious, longer if less obvious. Then rewrite the description (in all languages you master, for languages you don't understand the best path is probably to remove them and hope somebody comes along retranslating). At the end of the page, change categories as needed. I don't know the best path for the structured data, you might have to just click the structured data tab and edit with its user interface. If the photos are linked from Wikidata, go to the Wikidata item and deprecate the use with a "reason for lower rank" (?) of "erroneous" (?). (I don't remember the Wikidata names, try to find them). That should be all. The Wikidata item shouldn't need to be changed, unless it is wrong for the thing it is about, which if I understand correctly isn't the subject of these photos. –LPfi (talk) 11:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thanks ! I didn't mention = ALL of the above listed items, including the wikidata, contain the erroneous description and need to be modified [in fact it is the name of a church that is needs to be corrected, but that's beside the point]. Jwikip (talk) 19:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
It would be much easier if you gave the example, preferably with links. I thought the photo was of Joe Bloggs instead of Fred Bloggs. Then you'd move the photo to the other category and fix name, description etc. If it is the church that is wrongly named, not the wrong church named, then it's another procedure of course. You'd move also the category, and if it has more files than these two photos, you need to move those also (cat-a-lot comes handy). Wikidata might adjust by itself to that, if not you need to remove the faulty category name from the item and add the correct one. Then change the item label in all affected languages (on Wikidata), and check that it doesn't remain in some property (such as "native name"). Otherwise I think everything was covered. You don't need to change the files' Wikidata coupling (in the structured data), as it is to the item, not to the name. –LPfi (talk) 20:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
can i upload an image under the following conditions?
i want to upload a screenshot of a specific part of a map already on wikipedia for reference on a talk page. Can i do this even though it is not my work? Pigeonbloodblues (talk) 12:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes, at least if it is hosted here on Commons. Check the file description page of the map to see what licence it uses. Perhaps use the crop tool there instead of using the screenshot, unless it is the screenshot that is interesting. When you upload your own version, use the template {{Extracted from}} as source, with the original file's name as parameter, and copy the author field and the licence.
If the map is uploaded locally on the Wikipedia, it may be used as "fair use", and cannot be uploaded here. In that case you should be able to use also your file as fair use, but procedures vary across Wikipedias.
Hi Pigeonbloodblues. If the file is uploaded locally to English Wikipedia as non-free content, then you can use (i.e. display) the file on any talk pages per non-free content use criterion #9 and en:Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Non-free images. You can add a link to the file's page to the discussion, but you can't display it. Moreover, any screenshot or crop you make of non-free content will almost certainly be non-free as well, which means it too can't be displayed on talk pages. Perhaps is you can give the name of the file you're asking about, it will be easier to give you a more specific answer. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
I have published a transnistria anthem sheet music on Wikimedia commons to put it in my article and i dont know the type of the copyright of that sheet music so i put its from the internet and that sheet music was from "nationalanthem.info web" and i actually use it by the fair use copyright law as you can see And it says the file will be deleted in 7 days So please help
--Ibrahim A Al-sharqawi
User:Ibrahim alsharqawi124
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibrahim alsharqawi124 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
If "fair use" is allowed on the Wikipedia where you are going to use the file, you can upload it locally there. Fair use is allowed at least on Wikipedia in English, in certain cases. You could look for "Wikipedia:EDP" on your project, it might be a redirect to the page on the matter. –LPfi (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
I have a photo I want to upload to Commons that is licensed under CC BY 2.0. It seems like a decent license. However, I can't see it listed under the CC licenses in the upload options. Is there a problem with CC BY 2.0? If not, how can I get around this issue? Thank you! --FlantasyFlan (talk) 07:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
@FlantasyFlan: It's fine. I believe it's not overtly in the options because we don't encourage it for new works. I don't use the UploadWizard myself, so I'm not sure if there is a way to set it while uploading, but at worst you can edit immediately after uploading to correct the license to {{Cc-by-2.0}}. Someone else may be able to help further. - Jmabel ! talk15:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
You have the option of something like "none of these, I'll add it later". I don't remember the wording, but it should be in the list when you choose "not my work". –LPfi (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
I found that one of the photo upload by my colleague is expired. How can I remove it from common and upload another replacement? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.78.82.159 (talk) 04:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Please point to the file in question, so that we can check by ourselves some of the details that you don't tell in your question.
Generally, photos uploaded on Commons do not expire. We keep old ones, as they may be just the ones our reusers want; e.g. a Wikipedia article may want photos from different phases of a person's life or career. We might remove a bad photo when there is an equivalent good one, but I assume that is not the case here. If there is a reason to delete the old photo, please tell that reason to get advice.
We gladly accept the new photo. Upload it as any other file, with sufficient information on the subject, the author, and the licence. If there is a category for the person, make sure to add the file there (e.g. by using the Category field in the Upload Wizard). If there is no category, you could just add the new photo on the "other versions" line of the old photo and vice versa. You could also change image in Wikipedia articles, the languages of which you understand (after having checked the caption and other context to make sure the change is appropriate), or post a request on the article talk pages when you don't understand the language.
Is there any way that I can orded a couple of the U.S Strike Command Lapel Pins. I served in The U.S.Army and was stationed. And was stationed at MacDill AFB, FL in THE U.S.STRIKE COMMAND in THE ARMY AVIATION DIVISION from November 1963 through August 1965 and would very much love to have a couple of the lapel pins to add to my collection. Any way you can help me would be very much appreciated. JERRY L. DURMIRE jldurmire@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 47.7.240.46 (talk) 16:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome. Perhaps this is beyond the scope of this desk, but you could try asking at your local U.S.Army base, recruiting station, or VA facility. Thank you for your service. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me22:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Why the file has been marked for the speedy deletion
I didn't see any mention about CC-BY-SA on the page given as source. Is there? Or where is it said that the logo is under CC-BY-SA 4.0? Did you just pick the default licence on upload? You can do that for your own works, but not for works of others. Please point out any evidence of a free licence. I don't read Russian [Cyrillic script] well enough to figure out where it might be. –LPfi (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Oops, I am sorry. However, I don't find any mention of a free licence in the English version either. –LPfi (talk) 07:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Because there ain't any. Raid Shadow Legends is a free to play game, but it's not free in essence of license, and that also includes graphics. One thing might be to look for COM:TOO of the logo, but I doubt it's below TOO as the logo is quite complex. It has a complex texture, bevel effects, a little glare effect, and fairly specific font. I don't think it's suitable for Commons. The poster may be successful uploading a lower resolution version to English Wikipedia under Fair Use if it isn't there already. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 09:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I want to upload a photo of the thesis teacher. But you don't allow it for copyright reasons. I took the photo but I don't know how to prove it. I would be very happy if you help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehmet Nasıroğlu (talk • contribs) 23:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
@Adriansols: Hi, and welcome. https://www.facebook.com/hobolfotball/photos/a.543407832374296/543407835707629 has no free license or PD rationale, so we cannot accept it here on Commons. Please read COM:L. In addition, I am sorry to inform you that you have triggered Special:AbuseFilter/153 by trying to cross-wiki upload a smaller (<50,000 bytes or <2,000,000 pixels) jpg image as a new user, and Special:AbuseFilter/156 by trying to upload a smaller (<50,000 bytes) jpg image as a new user. Each jpg image you tried to upload is smaller, and you indicated it's your own work. Usually when someone uploads a smaller image, it is a copyright violation taken from the web. If you made the images yourself, please upload the full-size originals of them per COM:HR, including EXIF metadata. If you did not make the images, please see Commons:Licensing for why we can't accept them, and have the copyright holder(s) license them on their official websites or social media or send the images and permissions via OTRS with carbon copies to you. If you can't get a compliant license, the images may still be uploaded to English in compliance with en:WP:F or because we don't allow Fair Use here. If you use our Upload Wizard instead, you should be able to avoid filter 153. Fair use is not allowed on Norwegian Wikipedia. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me12:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Just a side note, the abbreviation for Fair Use sounds quite rude if said alone without any context. That's not quite well thought of. I wouldn't use that abbreviation without any further context when replying somebody, to avoid confusion. That's not what happened here, just voiced out what I noticed. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 13:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
I cannot find any uploaded files, I cannot find any abuse logs for your username, the only protocol log is your account creation and the only edits you have on Commons are Images on Wiki page and this section, nothing else. Your only edits on said page revolve around this deleted File:Col-cleveland-war-prize-painting.jpg, which was uploaded by User:Kushmania. Is it your older account? Did you lose access to that account (forgot your password) if that is true? If so, did you lose access to your email account associated with that account as well? Because one thing user can do if they forget their password is request a recovery process. That will send a newly generated password to said email or a link to change a password (old password is deleted and no longer valid, site cannot send you your old password as passwords are stored in an encrypted hash form which is virtually irrecoverable). If you no longer can access that email, then that's unfortunate. I'm not sure if people are allowed to use a new account because they can no longer access their old account for both forgetting password to the original account and losing access to associated email account as well. Given that said uploader is inactive for 5 months now, that might as well be true. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 07:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
van wanneer zichtbaar
Ik plaatse een beeld bij een artikel ,meer bepaald van Edmond Carton de Wiart
Kreeg bevestiging van het wikipedia systeem ,maar zie het toegevoegde beeld niet bij het artikel ?
Aangezien ik nieuw ben op wikipedia weet ik niet of ik alles wel correct gedaan heb ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caesargallery (talk • contribs) 08:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Audio file needed from a native speaker for a topic, however I was unable to upload my recording
Hello!
I was casually browsing the Wiki and noticed that there is a lack of an audio file for the correct pronunciation of the word “pastala”.
I tried uploading my own recording (mp3 audio file), as a native speaker of Latvian, however, my upload was automatically rejected.
How could this situation be resolved? I would really like to contribute to this article in particular, as well as many others in the future.
Thank You for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GraveyardGraden (talk • contribs) 17:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
MP3 upload is disabled for new users, because of many copyright violations in the past. The easiest way to solve this is to upload the files in ogg audio format, if your audio recording software allows this. See Commons:Audio. --rimshottalk20:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
@GraveyardGraden: Hi, and welcome. I am sorry to inform you that you have triggered Special:AbuseFilter/192 by trying to upload an mp3 file with insufficient rights. Too many people try to upload audio files that are still copyrighted by the authors, performers, recorders, publishing companies, etc. without proper licenses from those people. Please document more fully the sources and licenses of your audio uploads, and then request Autopatrol group membership at COM:RFR when you think you are ready (once you have made more than 500 useful non-botlike edits); having that should allow you to upload mp3 files. Until then, you may reencode the audio into Vorbis or Opus and upload it with full documentation as an .ogg or .oga file (or use any other format accepted per COM:FT#Sound). See also COM:SIGN. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me21:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Alexander Borovsky, pianist (1889-1968) graduated from the Gymnasium as did his sister Elena (who was awarded Lenin prize)
I want to add Alexander Borovsky (1889-1968) to graduates of St. Petersburg Conservatory.
How to transfer images from English-language Wikipedia to Commons?
Yesterday I saw that all photos in an article on English-language Wikipedia are not uploaded to Commons. I would like to know how to transfer the images to here. See:
@Kai3952: At the top-right of each page (at least in the usual desktop skin) there's a link "Export to Wikmedia Commons". Assuming the file has a suitable licence (and the first one above does, at least), that roughly converts the file description into a Commons-compatible form. You can change the name the file will have on Commons, or edit the description, but in most cases you can just scroll to the bottom and choose "Import". That will copy the file to Commons with all its history, and then you can edit the description and add categories as appropriate. There are other ways to transfer files to Commons, but I think this is by far the best. --bjh21 (talk) 00:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I was lazy to switch to English temporarily, I have my interface in Czech language, but the button placement should be identical. It's basically at the top of the page in the right where the Edit and History links usually reside. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 12:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
@Kai3952: Where this screenshot says "Export to Test Wiki" In the standard desktop skin (called "Vector") it appears in the top-right corner of the page. If your window is narrow, it may be behind "More". It'll only appear if you're logged into English Wikipedia. I don't know where it appears in other skins, but it should be somewhere analogous. --bjh21 (talk) 13:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes. Did you see my screenshot? It's right at the top right corner of the page, next to the search bar. If you don't see it, try clicking "More", maybe it's hidden for a too narrow window. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 09:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
@Polda18: Do you need some rights for the link to appear? Normally importing requires admin rights; although I assume you don't need them for this to work, it might not be enabled for new users, and its working may require that you are logged in on Commons too (and have appropriate rights here), which you normally are, but not necessarily if you have disallowed third-party cookies or third-party javascript. –LPfi (talk) 09:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
@LPfi: I don't have admin rights on English Wikipedia and I can see the link. Never used it tho, but I guess it should be available at least to registered users to use. I guess third party cookies blocking might be a problem here, but I personally never tested this. The thing is each Wikimedia site works with a central login. It is capable of detecting your login session on another wiki and suggests you to reload the page to load the active login session. How exactly does that work? Don't know for sure, but it might be cookie sharing. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 09:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
@Kai3952: Aha! I think I've found it. Based on the FileExporter source code, I think it only activates if your account is autoconfirmed. Your account isn't autoconfirmed because while you've been on English Wikipedia for nine years, you've only made six edits there. Make four more edits and the link should appear. --bjh21 (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Huh, I never noticed that. Maybe because I've edited my userpage so many times and discussed so many times that my edits count simply surpassed that requirement a long time ago. That's interesting. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 12:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
@SeanJ 2007: You cannot overwrite an image in one format with an image in another format. If File:Love Radio logo.webp is a copyvio, it should be deleted; if there is another logo that won't have the copyright issue, then upload that as File:Love Radio logo.png.
Also, in general, it is almost never correct to overwrite an image with anything other than technical improvements. If you are uploading a distinct image (e.g. a different logo), start from scratch even if they are both in the same graphics format. - Jmabel ! talk05:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
@Jmabel: I uploaded a new version of the logo but in a different format, (PNG format). See File:Love Radio 2021 logo.png, I am suppose to change the file at w:en:Love Radio because the first was tag as no permission. But I cannot add it there because I am blocked on the enwiki site. Kindly please mind to add it there? Thank you. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
There is a policy regarding COM:TOO (Threshold of originality). If the original logo isn't released under CC-BY license, but is below TOO, or the uploaded part is below TOO, then you should use appropriate license template for this type of scenario. Just a reminder, not all countries treat TOO the same. Czech Republic for example is very vague about what can be considered an original creation. Apparently, all you have to do is to register it as intelectual property and it's basically copyrighted. As with the WEBP format image, I'm not sure what is the status of TOO. I don't know where Love Radio comes from, I don't know what TOO status is for it therefore. If there is no TOO and all it takes is just an inteletual property, then I'm afraid that even the new cut out logo might be a copyvio as companies like this rarely release new logos under a free license. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 06:09, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi ProjectHorizons. Commons doesn't accept any type of fair use (i.e. non-free) content per COM:FAIR; so, if the file needs to be converted to such a license, then it will have to be deleted from Commons and then reuploaded locally to whichever language Wikipedia project where you want to use it in accordance with whatever the local policy is for non-free content. Now, not all language Wikipedias allow fair use content, but you can find a list of those that do at meta:Non-free content. As for this file's licensing, I believe you might be right but for a slightly different reason. If the content originated with REFL/RL, then their licensing doesn't seem to allow the unrestricted commercial reuse that Commons requires; however, the photo is attributed as "Alexander Nemenov (AFP)", which is en:AFP. It's possible that REFL/RL just was using the photo in one of its stories and the real source of the photo did release it under a license acceptable for Commons. That is something, though, that would need to be demonstrated per COM:EVID by the uploader for the file to be kept. Note that a slightly different photo of the same scene (along with many other photos taken in Chechnya by Nemenov around the same time) can be seen here in a 2019 AFP story written by Nemenov himself and there's no indication that he's been releasing his work under a free license Commons accepts. Nemenov has an Instagram account here, but I can see whether the same photo can be found there under an acceptable license. There seems to be a least enough doubt about the file's licensing to start a discussion about it at COM:DR, but first it might be courteous to ask the uploader why they think the file has been released under a "cc-by-sa-4.0"license; it could just be that they aren't very familiar with Commons and thought the file was OK to upload. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Yes, I withdrew my deletion request because I simply didn't know enough about copyright to debate the issue. Thank you for taking it up yourself. ProjectHorizons (talk) 06:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
It's okay to not know enough. Once you have a hunch, start a discussion, more experienced users may help you in this regard. If you have a feeling some files shouldn't be on Commons for copyright reasons, start a DR discussion. Eighter most users will support it or deny it. Nothing bad should happen to you for starting a discussion. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 06:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Looks like the 03 and 06 are essentially the same image, the later only slightly cropped, which in my opinion is better. As for 02 and 09, that is indeed a duplicate image, the latter is simply a higher resolution version of the first one. Higher resolution is better, so I'd keep the latter. And yes, you should pay attention to cropping. Not every single image is a duplicate. There are images that are cropped versions of a source image, where the crops show different regions of the original image. One prime example may be simple group photo of several people, and several crops of índividual people in separate files. That is not a duplicate image as it actually helps distinguish between various people in a group photo. Or cropped sections of a panorama shot, showing different parts of the landscape. That is another prime example where crops are useful. As for different resolution sizes, I'd only keep the highest resolution file as it provides as much detail as it can, and MediaWiki software provides lower resolution versions of the original image automatically, which saves on data usage, so there is no need to manually provide lower resolution files. The thing is that the site is able to detect native resolution of the device screen and its pixel density, so it can provide higher resolution for the same pixel width on page where needed (mobile phones, FHD laptops with higher density screen, etc.) As for slight crops leaving a vast majority of the original picture, this is a tough one in decision of which one to keep. I guess the less lower value parts are in the picture, the better. Background typically does not provide enough useful informations about the image subject, so if you crop outer parts of the backgroud out of the image, then I think that is better. But that depends on what was in the background, because while not always, sometimes background does provide useful informations, too, which is a context to why that photo was taken or when, or where. Sometimes it's better to keep the original photo and delete the cropped one that essentially shows the same thing as vast majority of the photo was left in. User:Jmabel seems to be wrong this time. Sorry, buddy. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 06:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
@Polda18: Look again at 02 and 09, they are not only different resolution, they are a different crop. I agree that the multiple versions here are not valuable, and I would have no problem with someone nominating them for deletion, but they are not duplicates. I wasn't really passing judgement on whether or not we should delete superfluous images (I personally don't think it's worth the effort, but no big deal if someone wants to spend time on it) but if we are going to have multiple versions of the same photo, they should be linked. - Jmabel ! talk15:28, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Ok, the image is somewhat slightly cropped. Still, it displays the exact same subject from the exact same angle from the exact same focus. I simply do not see this as individual crops, I see this as duplicate images. There is a threshold which says where the crop is its own image with its own context, and where the crop is too wide so it cannot be considered as not duplicate. Don't tell me that those images don't look the same to you. Machine might be easily fooled, but human should be able to see how similar these images are. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 19:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Often the uncropped image shows a bit of context that may be useful for being able to add to the description, or to give a feeling for the context for a reader of an article where it is included. The examples you gave would make sense if there had been disagreement over which one was better, but these seem to be original simultaneous uploads. Perhaps the photographer/uploader just isn't able to decide for themselves. That would be an acceptable reason to upload both, and the probable reason in this case. –LPfi (talk) 07:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
P.S. That was on an Android device (again, using 2 different browsers). It works fine, in 2 different browsers, on a Windows 10 device. -- Gyrofrog (talk)17:36, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Free image suitable to indicate "surprise/shock/horror"?
I'm surprised and shocked!
I've just uploaded Dun dun duuun!. The most famous use is the Dramatic Chipmunk which has a great image. But that image is not free. I'd like a free replacement, I'm open to suggestions. Any image properly showing surprise/shock/horror is useful, but I'd like to keep it in the animal world if possible. There is [Surprised young cat.JPG], but it looks more bewildered than surprised. Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Well, on English Wikipedia, Fair Use is allowed, but I'm not sure if you're allowed to reuse already uploaded Fair Use material that has been uploaded for other articles. As for Commons, yes, the original screenshot of the Dramatic Chipmunk video cannot be uploaded here, it's not a free image. In an essence, the viral video already kind of violates copyright as it's a straight cut out of copyrighted material. The only reason it is allowed is that it is an original composition of various materials for the purpose of entertainment. Dramatic Chipmunk was in an essence one of the first memes that appeared online. Memes are a special type of Fair Use material where you use a copyrighted material for various jokes. There's a limit however, and that is you shouldn't exceed some amount of copyrighted material that would classify as remix and you would have to pay royalties to release it. It's obvious that you cannot sample an entire movie for a meme. That would be a parody otherwise, and believe me, people have been caught on that. Funny parody, but copyright violation in an essence. It was an entire movie with a parody voiceover. I liked it, but creators ended up in jail and with massive fines. Short snippets? They're mostly okay. But again, that could be considered Fair Use, which Commons doesn't allow. Whatever, it's not free to use, unless the original is released under a free license compatible with Commons. Anything that imposes restrictions, isn't considered as free. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 05:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
On reusing fair use files: Fair use is about the use, and every use needs to be fair. That's why we cannot have then on Commons. On Wikipedia in English, you'd need to write a fair use rationale for every new use. –LPfi (talk) 07:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
So it's not that I upload it there to English WP and stick a Fair Use template to which article I want to use it in, I need to write a rationale to use it before uploading it? And if it is already uploaded, I need to write a rationale to reuse already uploaded content before sticking it to a new article? I guess using Commons and finding a free image sounds easier in this case. I edit mainly Czech Wikipedia, we do not have such thing in our local wiki. Czech Republic doesn't utilize law similar to the Fair Use and such content therefore cannot be allowed on Czech Wikipedia. So much simpler to just reject uploads rather than having to fill out rationale to use a copyrighted material under Fair Use. I do understand why Commons doesn't allow non-free content like that. Since Commons is a global storage for every single wiki, it does make sense that it shouldn't host non-free content as it would make it available for wikis that don't allow such content. Fair enough. The only exception to this is set of artwork for Wikimedia projects, where it is actually important to provide that content globally. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 10:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
You add the rationale at upload or shortly after, or before or after adding it to a new page. On the law, though, I would think that you'd have similar provisions: aren't journalists allowed to publish pictures of an art exhibition they write about or, on radio, include some of the music of a concert they visited? The provisions may be cumbersome for our needs, and using them may not be worthwhile. Wikipedia in Swedish, which I know best, also doesn't allow free use, partly out of principle, partly to avoid the hassle of checking for copyright violations among local uploads. –LPfi (talk) 11:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
And for similar provisions. European law may have something similar to the Fair Use, but specifically Czech Republic doesn't allow Fair Use or similar content, our laws do not utilize such thing. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 11:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
It depends on what source the image is from. I am not familiar with Indian government and Army sources, so I can't tell if the said image is in public domain (which usually is if it comes from an official government source). Commons usually doesn't allow photos from news articles as those photos are usually subject for copyright protection, which means these images cannot be uploaded to Commons. They may be uploaded in a lower resolution to some language Wikipedias (not all) that allow Fair Use material, but Commons doesn't allow that. Keep in mind that some countries do not adapt a law similar to Fair Use, their language Wikimedia projects therefore may not allow Fair Use content. Read more at COM:FAIR. For more informations about Indian copyright rules, read COM:INDIA. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 08:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Painting of Louix 14th seems to be available
This painting you have... Adam_Frans_van_der_Meulen_-_Louis_XIV_at_the_taking_of_Besançon_(1674) jpeg , seems to be available. I want to write a small photo book about Appaloosa horses and i could use it as fill in. Im not even sure if i can get it published as its so expensive but thought id right to you and see. Do i have to pay for it. Cheers from Australia
David Everdell ... deverdell@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:8004:1400:5DFA:5D69:A77C:91:C165 (talk) 07:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no licence tag for use in the USA. However, I assume that the mention of "The Golitsyn Museum, Moscow, 1886" indicates it was "published" at latest that year, i.e. before now-95 years. Could somebody check and add {{PD-US-expired}}? –LPfi (talk) 09:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Crop and upload a picture already in Wikimedia Commons?
Hi! I am pretty new to Wikipedia Commons, but someone was asking at Wikipedia's Teahouse if they could upload a picture of Lil Huddy. They can't as it is not their picture, but I looked to see if I could find if he had any picture here already, and I found this one: File:Weist & Influencers.jpg. He appears there at the right of the picture. What steps must I follow to have a derived picture of just him? Thank you! --AdrianHObradors (talk) 09:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, I was going to use the croptool, but I got the impression that I would edit the original image, and that isn't what I want to do, I want to create a copy of the image. Thanks again --AdrianHObradors (talk) 11:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
You can overwrite an image with the croptool, but you can also create a new file. If you overwrite, you get a red warning message ("do you really want..."), if you create a new one you can edit the proposed filename "oldname (cropped).ext" before saveing. however you have to edit the description page, the tool only inserts links between both images, doesnt make other changes to the description C.Suthorn (talk) 12:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be a wideshot that happened to warp the corners with the lens perspective. I'm afraid the crop won't look too good, unless the lens warp is accounted for. He seems to be weirdly stretched and widened by the lens. Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 11:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes, he doesn't look that great, but it is the only image available. Hopefully he or someone with an image of him will see it and decide to upload a better one. Until then, I believe that one will have to work. --AdrianHObradors (talk) 11:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Bug in Upload Wizard
Quite a while ago I reported a bug whereby clicking "Upload more files" in the Upload Wizard and then choosing a file consistently causes a spurious error message "There was an error in your submission. You are already uploading the file filename." This still has not been fixed. While it is possible to click through the error, and the upload apparently works OK anyway, it is still a pretty glaring or blatant bug that really ought to be fixed. I wonder whether anyone here can exert any influence to get that done now. ITookSomePhotos (talk) 10:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
I cannot do anything about it, I just note that at most batches of upload, I get that error message on one or more of the files. Sometimes there might be a reason (reuploading a file on "upload more files"), but mostly not. –LPfi (talk) 11:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Replace misnamed image file
I uploaded a file named Waterman,_Portrait_of_a _Young _Girl.jpg, but the correct name should be Waterman,_Portrait_of_a _Young _Woman.jpg,
@Pontchardon: No need to delete it. Just use the "Move" item on the "More" menu to ask for it to be renamed under criterion 1. See COM:FR for more information about renaming files. --bjh21 (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Uploading files/images that are in the public domain but which are apart of an archived publication
Hi there!
I've been doing some work over on Wikipedia, and have been trying to add some historical images to certain articles. I found some really great ones already pre-uploaded to the Commons. These images inspired me to dig into their sourcing, and I found that they were posted at archive.org. The images, however, were uploaded via Flickr from a now-defunct account used by archive.org on the website. I found some other really great historical images on archive.org and am hoping to get them uploaded to the Commons. Should I simply snip them as a screenshot and then upload them? Or should I upload them to Flickr first? And what would that procedure look like in terms of labeling, sourcing, and licensing? Really appreciate any help you can provide!
@JohnHawkinsBois: There are doubtless people with more experience in this kind of thing than me, but here's what I'd do. I wouldn't try to take screenshots, since that's very dependent on precisely how your browser renders things. I similarly don't think there's any merit in going via Flickr. Instead I'd download the "single page processed jp2 zip" file and unpack it, giving a big pile of .jp2 files. Then I'd load the page I wanted into my favourite image editor, crop to the part I was interested in and save as JPEG. Then I'd upload the JPEG to Commons using the Upload Wizard. For the source, I'd specify the archive.org URL you gave, with a note along the lines of "cropped from processed JP2". In this case, the licence tag is simple: {{PD-US-expired}} ("First published in the USA before 1927" in the Upload Wizard). --bjh21 (talk) 20:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I want to upload a free image to Wikimedia Commons. It is asking for the date of the creation of file. Is mentioning date necessary? Because we can't know creation date of every file. Is it important to mention? If no, so how can I upload without mentioning date? Thank you. IconEditorMaster (talk) 15:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
@IconEditorMaster: The Upload Wizard requires you to enter something in the date field, but if you select the pencil icon next to the date you can write whatever you like in there. If you know the year, you can write that (e.g. "2022"). If you don't even know that you can use the {{Other date}} template. For instance, {{other date|?}} will generate "Unknown date", while {{other date|decade|2020}} will generate "2020s
Dates are often important; how important depends on context. If you only know an approximate date, you can put that in with a "c" (meaning circa, sometime around date), eg "c. 2009" or "c. 1930s". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes. Write something sensible, as accurate as you can. Somebody else can use {{Other date}} to get it automatically translated to other users' languages. It supports intervals, ca, before, probably etc., and if what you write cannot be made to fit its model, the text can be left as such. When using a file, I am often interested in when the photo was taken (or whatever), and the date is also often critical to determine copyright status (copyrights may expire 50, 70 or 95 years after creation or publication, for some works in some jurisdictions). –LPfi (talk) 18:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
@Logo Editor: i see that you upload mostly svg logos. my personal opinion is that you should try to put down when the logo was created or first used (by their organisations). if you dont know, then just put down the year when you created the svg (like this year 2022).--RZuo (talk) 19:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot and YouTube
There is a video on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJNpSnE-Ou8 As you can see it is published under a CC licence (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported).
The question is can we take a screenshot of the left side of the video (with a bald guy) and use it here? Or we can use only the right side (with radio hosts)? I am asking this because the hosts said that this bald guy is using Skype to communicate with them or whatever. They are not recording him directly. Thanks in advance. --RenatUK (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
@RenatUK: there were discussions on com:vpc on this problem. you can find it in archives. i remember the conclusion we had were (1) we dont know. no court case has been brought upon this problem yet. (2) it's probably ok to screenshot in this case, when the guy is voluntarily doing the video call and letting the video be published by the youtube channel, because the recording of the video call involves no creative input.--RZuo (talk) 18:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Done Alright, File:Central England Temperatures Seasonal.png is gone. De728631 (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
wikimedia.org, stating (s)he wants to licence their photo with the CC0 licence. The permission will be mentioned on the file page without a name/attribution. The email to VRT remains private. Ellywa (talk) 09:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Resolved
_(14591328138).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AShane_Warne_February_2015.jpg&type=revision&diff=634706933&oldid=598591949){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:French_Empire_on_World_1812.png){kind=link}
_(14591328138).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14591328138).jpg){kind=link}
#/media/File:Port_Arthur,_Tasmania.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_The_Earthern_Pig.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg#License){kind=link}
_(14782704624).jpg){kind=link}
