Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Playmates (Fred C. Fishback, 1921).webm

File:Playmates (Fred C. Fishback, 1921).webm, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2019 at 07:41:53
To visit the nomination page click here.

(File Location)

• Category: Commons:Featured videos/Fiction
•  Info created by Fred C. Fishback, edited and uploaded by M5, nominated by Yann (talk) 07:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support This is hilarious. -- Yann (talk) 07:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Too funny for words -- Eatcha (talk) 17:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Great.--Ermell (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 15:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Is there no version without a destructive watermark? I appreciate that someone has gone in to blur it, but it would be even better without a big blurry rectangle in the bottom-right. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment It seems the original is tinted. — Racconish ^💬 06:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose on technical grounds. I can easily forgive all the little blemishes that come from analog film. It's the digital representation that's bugging me, which is fairly low quality and full of digital artifacts. Pixelization along straight lines is the easiest to spot and distinguish from film grain, and it certainly doesn't help that it's been through Youtube. Even that might be forgiven, but that blurry patch in the lower right corner where the FilmoTeca logo used to be is a deal breaker for me. Finally, I don't know what kind of film was used here, but given 35mm was standard by 1921, the resolution (pixel count) this was digitized at also seems to be quite low. --El Grafo (talk) 11:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)