Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tanja Vienonen on cover of Eeva 1998 (JOKASEK5I09A-1).tif

File:Tanja Vienonen on cover of Eeva 1998 (JOKASEK5I09A-1).tif, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 10:07:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tanja Vienonen on cover of Eeva 1998 (JOKASEK5I09A-1).tif Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tanja Vienonen on cover of Eeva 1998 (JOKASEK5I09A-1).tif

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
•  Info Finnish model and politician Tanja Karpela in 1998 - created by Seppo Konstig - uploaded by FinnaUploadBot - nominated by Thi

* Support -- Thi (talk) 10:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 12:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support tiff is more for raw(or scans) and not for web. Please transform it in JPG using RGB --Wilfredor (talk) 18:44, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Converting master images (i.e., versions of what Wikimedia Commons uses as source images when scaling) from lossless images to lossy compression is a bad idea as it degrades the image quality. Also, Wikimedia Commons does a good enough transparent conversion from TIFF to JPEG on the fly that there is no need for manual conversions for general use just to get a JPEG version of the file. --Zache (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak support A JPG version is a standard format that has the advantage of a low weigh. It is also easy to download, and to display in many softwares and browsers. You can choose the best conversion rate with minimum loss, almost insignificant. And the original TIFF remains available with a link in the image page -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose JPEG version is better for FP. Yann (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Support Normaly i dont touch film photos, i support both, here i added some light and remove red capilars in eye. --Mile (talk) 12:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good execution. Thanks for the edit, Mile. I think the inversion of the vignetting as an improvised solution for the retouch is very successful in this case and fits harmoniously into the image. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support withdrawn Without doing a research before, I did not know that this is a historically important photograph with a bio. Therefore I withdraw my vote, although I believe a plain derivative would be permissible. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support --Yann (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support withdrawn --Thi (talk) 21:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)  Comment The edited version is a good addition and I would like to support it, but it is too bright when compared to original. --Thi (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Original photo is here. It is a famous photograph, part of the "Finnish Heritage Agency". You can't change the appearance of a widespread cover of magazine Eeva, and pretend the author is the photographer Seppo Konstig with such a fancy effect as this white gradient all around. Many photographers don't like this nebulous, cloudy style, and it would be misleading to believe that the photographer chose this appearance for that portrait. You can modify the photos that belong to you as much as you want, but for the significant photos that are anchored in history, it seems essential to me to respect the original source, even if it is not to the taste of all the participants from Wikimedia in 2024. Imagine Che Guevara, or Louis Armstrong with a similar white cloud outline, it would be ridiculous to promote such a version. Okay for the original (unedited) in JPG only -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Alternative 2

•  Support This is unedited JPG picture with the 1990s-style color saturation. [1] --Thi (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Conversion was fine in my opinion. No difference between both versions (TIF and JPG) in a sRGB environment. Excellent portrait -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Here in Browser WB is completely off. --August (talk) 10:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I have uploaded better version. --Thi (talk) 11:21, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

• Thanks for the edit. Funnily enough, I just created an improved version too, with an embedded sRGB profile :) But your version has more vivid colors. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support --Yann (talk) 17:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support El Golli Mohamed 20:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support. --Gnosis (talk) 18:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

The chosen alternative is: File:Tanja Vienonen on cover of Eeva 1998 (JOKASEK5I09A-1).jpg