Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eva Nogales in 2023 02.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Eva Nogales in 2023 02.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2024 at 09:09:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created and uploaded by Cmichel67 - nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 09:09, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Kadellar (talk) 09:09, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The photo looks blurry except for the face. I would prefer the cropped version without the leg. --Thi (talk) 10:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- That's called portrait photography. The face is what's important in such a shot. That's why they make 1.2, 1.4 and 1.8 lenses. --Kadellar (talk) 10:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose in favor of new version. --Cart (talk) 15:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 11:12, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- In favor of the alternative version. ★ 17:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed. What happened to the bottom right corner? -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Oops. Thank you for pointing this out, Basile! There is a strange border, similar to a tear in paper, around her knee, as if somebody had combined two photos without proper stitching. @Cmichel67: Could you please have a look and remove, if possible, that patch? This photo really deserves improvements! --Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- You are right -- I've updated it here: File:Eva Nogales in 2023 06.jpg.
- And thank you Cmichel67 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Cmichel67, thank you very much for the other version! To avoid confusion, I have taken the liberty to change your link to a simple text link and to add the other version as an “alternative version” below. This helps voters (and our FPCBot) to distinguish between both versions and to make clear which vote and comment belongs to which version. Hope it helps, best, --Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- thank you. i'm not really an expert at wikipedia so grateful for all your help. Cmichel67 (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Cmichel67, thank you very much for the other version! To avoid confusion, I have taken the liberty to change your link to a simple text link and to add the other version as an “alternative version” below. This helps voters (and our FPCBot) to distinguish between both versions and to make clear which vote and comment belongs to which version. Hope it helps, best, --Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Oops. Thank you for pointing this out, Basile! There is a strange border, similar to a tear in paper, around her knee, as if somebody had combined two photos without proper stitching. @Cmichel67: Could you please have a look and remove, if possible, that patch? This photo really deserves improvements! --Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Alternative version
[edit]- Support This is the alternative version mentioned by the photographer Cmichel67 in the comment above. It fixes the problem at the knee (mentioned by Basile) and IMHO also has better/more realistic colours. We should discuss if cropping a bit at the bottom would further improve the photo, but IMHO it’s already a solid improvement. --Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support This version has natural colors. --Thi (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Moved my support to this version, thanks everyone for the effort of fixing this nomination. Normal DoF for a portrait, and I really like the "Sassy Scientist" play this photo has, upturned collar and all. It's time to dust off the old stereotype of how scientists are and should be photographed. --Cart (talk) 15:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 17:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Great contribution!! --Alu (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support We need more portraits like this! --Kritzolina (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Knees decide! JukoFF (talk) 21:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support It was striking enough to make me look her up and find out what her research is about, so I think that’s a success Cmao20 (talk) 02:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Laitche (talk) 08:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 19:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women
The chosen alternative is: File:Eva Nogales in 2023 06.jpg