User talk:Zerohund~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Moin Zerohund, schön, dass Du auch hier gelandet bist. Ein guter Tipp für den Überblick ist das Commons:Gemeinschaftsportal, dort insbesondere Commons:Babel de (für die blauen Sprachinfos auf den Nutzerseiten zur reibungslosen Kommunikation). Grüße einstweilen von :Bdk: 23:37, 12 Dez 2004 (UTC)

Image deletion warning The image Image:Ditim Einladung Juli 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 12:53, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCommons do not allow offical logos. I found this logo at the band's offical webpage. What is your part in the creative process of the band? Thuresson 01:43, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete image. I had been drawing the logo after a similar one on a ticket for a dEUS concert, then scanning it in the opinion, this process would add sufficient artistic contribution to be put under GFDL. Obviously I was misled here, I'm sorry for that. Zerohund 14:40, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Radierungen 19. Jahrhundert[edit]

ciao z.h.: wo hast du denn die prima zeichnung von cézanne her? gibts da noch mehr aus der quelle - die kannte ich gar nicht. gruß wiki-user m.sack 20:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Hallo M. Sack, ich habe aus einer Erbschaft eine Mappe mit mehreren Dutzend Radierungen und Stichen, Aquatintas etc. aus dem 19. Jh., von Cézanne ist allerdings nur diese eine dabei. Sind alle auch nicht übermäßig viel wert, da nicht signiert und vermutlich Nachdrucke von den Original-Platten. Habe vor einigen Tagen begonnen, die kleineren Formate zu scannen und hochzuladen, falls es dich interessiert siehe linke Spalte: User contributions... Gruß, Zerohund 15:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Das Foto von der Kirche in Ifenthal[edit]

Hallo. Ich habe gerade das wunderschöne Foto von der Kirche in Ifenthal gesehen und frage mich, wie Du diesen Effekt erzeugt hast, dass das Bild an den Rändern wie ein Gemälde wirkt. Zuerst dachte ich an eine Traumlinse, aber ich glaube, Du hast es mit digitalen Mitteln nachbearbeitet. Verrätst Du mir, wie? :) Sehr schönes Foto. 217.228.72.149 18:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:India_Goa_Stranded_Ship.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. le Korrigan bla 10:57, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder Großmarkthalle München[edit]

Hallo Zerohund. Die zwei Bilder :

im Artikel [1] werden bei mir nicht korrekt angezeigt, auch zeigt kein Link auf das Bild. Bei beiden Bildern ist ein Komma im Dateinamen, vermutlich ist dass das Problem. Kannst du die Bilder bitte ohne Komma im Dateinamen neu hochladen ? -- Ilion 10:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Gruß, -- Zerohund 18:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
Dieses Medium könnte gelöscht werden.

Vielen Dank, dass du Image:MUC Ruhmeshalle 14 Leonhard v. Eck.jpg hochgeladen hast. Leider gibt die Beschreibungsseite nicht an, wer den Inhalt erstellt hat, daher ist der Urheberrechts-Status unklar. Falls du den Inhalt selbst erstellt hast, vermerke dies bitte auf der Beschreibungsseite (siehe Lizenzbausteine weiter unten). Falls der Inhalt nicht von dir selbst stammt, musst du begründen, warum er auf den Commons verwendet werden darf, und angeben, woher die Datei stammt, z. B. mit einem Link zur Ursprungsseite und zu den Nutzungsbedingungen dort. Falls es sich um eine Bearbeitung handelt, musst du die Namen und eine Lizenz der ursprünglichen Autoren mit angeben.

Falls das Medium nicht mit einem Lizenzbaustein ausgezeichnet ist, musst du unbedingt einen hinzufügen. Wenn du das Bild, die Audiodatei oder das Video selbst erstellt hast, kannst du den Baustein {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} für die Creative Commons Lizenz oder {{PD-self}} für Gemeinfreiheit setzen. Siehe Commons:Lizenzvorlagen für die komplette Liste der nutzbaren Lizenzen und den dazugehörigen Lizenzbausteinen.

Bitte beachte, dass alle Bilder ohne Quellen- und/oder Lizenzangaben eine Woche nach dem Hochladen gelöscht werden. Dies kannst du auf der Seite Richtlinien zum Löschen nachlesen. Falls du noch andere Dateien hochgeladen hast, überprüfe bitte auch, ob dort Quellen- und Urheberinformationen angegeben sind. Du kannst alle von dir hochgeladenen Bilder mit dem Galerie-Tool ansehen. Vielen Dank.

PS: Vielleicht möchtest du deinen Babelbaustein "gute Deutschkenntnisse" in "Deutsch als Muttersprache" umwandeln. Ist wohl korrekter!? ← Körnerbrötchen - @ 16:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Janosch-Rosenheim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--89.56.212.12 21:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot it in this case. Done meanwhile. --Dominik Hundhammer 13:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bild "Isar bei Hochwasser 24.08.2005"[edit]

Servus,

das Bild, das die Isar bei Hochwasser am 25.08.2005 zeigt, ist, so toll es auch ist, defintiiv nicht von der Wittelsbacherbrücke aus aufgenommen, sondern von der Reichenbachbrücke aus! Die Wittelsbacherbrücke ist die nächst südlichere Brücke! --MaxM 15:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Auch Servus, da hast Du natürlich vollkommen recht, da war ich unachtsam beim Benennen der Files und habe den Fehler dann unbesehen in die Beschreibung übernommen ... betriebsblind, ich hab bei dem Hochwasser Dutzende Fotos von verschiedenen Brücken aus gemacht ... ich habe es jetzt in der Bilderklärung korrigiert, bin aber momentan zu faul, das Ding unter anderem Namen neu hochzuladen, LA zu stellen, Links in Artikel entsprechend zu ändern etc. ... ich hoffe ich denke noch daran, das nachzuholen, sonst kannst das natürlich gerne auch Du machen, falls es Dich stört ... Gruß, --85.181.63.221 21:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dominik, das kann natürlich schon mal passieren, wenn man gleich eine Menge Bilder zu benennen hat. :D Übrigens, wenn du gleich eine ganze Serie von Bildern vom Isarhochwasser 2005 hast, bist Du vielleicht interessiert, sie anderen Leuten zu zeigen. Das könntest Du unter http://wettercommunity.foren-city.de machen. Das ist ein sehr gutes Forum für wetterinteressierte Leute und solche, die ihre Wetterfotos und Fotos von Wetterfolgen gerne zeigen und drüber diskutieren wollen. Auch dort ist mein Nick MaxM. Dein Foto hier in der Wikimedia ist jedenfalls super! --MaxM 12:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für das Lob! Aber tut mir leid, für die Wettercommunity habe ich momentan keine Zeit, ich schaff gerade noch so mein Pensum an Wikipedia ... --Dominik Hundhammer 21:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Zerohund, ich habe habe mal eine Frage zu dem obigen Bild. Ist das dein eigenes Foto? Dann wäre es nett, wenn Du es nachlizenzieren könntest mit {{PD-self}}, denn {{PD-art}} ist etwas arg fragwürdig, da 1. das Bild selbst m. W. schon nicht zweidimensional ist, sondern eine Kuppel und 2. auch kräftig Stuckskulptur zu sehen ist. --AndreasPraefcke 21:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Andreas, dann lieber löschen, sorry für die Arbeit. Ich hab das Bild wohl vor längerem, in meiner Wikipedia/-media Anfangszeit eingestellt und weiß auch nicht mehr, woher ich es hatte, selbstfotografiert ist es jedenfalls leider nicht. Damals fand ich es eine Weile lang interessant, Wikipedia Artikel mit vermeintlich gemeinfreien Bildern aus dem Web zu illustrieren. Man müsste meine Bilder vielleicht noch mal auf lizenzrechtlich Fragwürdiges abklopfen, wobei ich hoffentlich nicht allzuviele Fehler gemacht habe und seit langem nur noch, wenn überhaupt, eigene Fotos einstelle. Schönen Sonntag noch, Dominik --Dominik Hundhammer 11:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAZ -- 172.173.184.206 18:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for caring to tell me, it's always a little pleasure to find one of my pictures in press ... --Dominik Hundhammer (talk) 22:45, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Munich Sendling Großmarkthalle-interior.jpg[edit]

I have included this image in article "mayorista" (Wholesale) of Wikipedia in Spanish. If I did wrong, please let me know or remove it. Thanks in advance. Madalberta--80.31.188.240 00:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, the image was uploaded by me under GFDL for which to do I was granted permission by Frederic Weihberg, then Marketing Director of Munich Wholesale Market, rights-owner of the image. Have a nice day! Saludos, --Dominik Hundhammer (talk) 10:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Am Auermühlbach Quellenstr ca 1910.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rama (talk) 07:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kraemersche_Kunstmühle_altsw.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kraemersche_Kunstmühle_altsw.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ChristianBier (talk) 23:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Zerohund~commonswiki!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:München-Sendling_Schmied-von-Kochel-Denkmal_Lindwurmstrasse_20051028.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

h-stt !? 20:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Munich Sendling Gotzinger Platz with mosque - draft Höfler.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

77.184.138.109 08:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:D ERASM' ROTERODAM'.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:D ERASM' ROTERODAM'.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:D ERASM' ROTERODAM'.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spekulatius[edit]

Wenn ich es richtige zurückverfolgt habe, stammt das Spekulatius-Foto (das mit den vier Plätzchen) von Dir. Welches Produkt (Marke, Zeit) ist das? Nur interssehalbe (ich kenne die, habe die aber schon ewig nicht mehr gesehen). 91.43.26.107 13:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demeter-knospe Switzerland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 03:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

00:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

06:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Osterseen Karte.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HerrAdams (talk) 10:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Osterseen Karte.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HerrAdams (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerrhard Richter Plakat Lenbachhaus 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish 14:41, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Munich Sendling Mosque Winner Drawing Höfler.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Munich Sendling Mosque Winner Drawing Höfler.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

HerrAdams (talk) 14:56, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung ins WikiMUC und zum Münchner Wikipedia Stammtisch[edit]

Das WikiMUC in der Angertorstraße 3

Hallo, wir schreiben Dich an, weil Du laut Deiner Benutzerseite in oder in der Umgebung von München wohnst. Vielleicht hast Du schon gehört, dass sich in München Wikipedianer auch außerhalb des Internets treffen? Es gibt einen monatlichen Stammtisch und es gibt mit dem WikiMUC einen Treffpunkt und Veranstaltungsraum für Wikipedianer.

Das WikiMUC in der Angertorstraße 3 (am Sendlinger Tor) ist auch Dein Ort! Dort kannst Du andere Wikipedianer treffen, Erfahrungen austauschen, Projekte planen, Probleme besprechen, Tee oder Kaffee trinken und Veranstaltungen besuchen oder organisieren. Es gibt diverse PCs, ein offenes WLAN, eine Fotoausrüstung – die man auch ausleihen kann – und einen schnellen DIN-A3-Buchscanner. Darüber hinaus unternehmen wir regelmäßig Exkursionen und Wanderungen. Schau einfach mal unverbindlich vorbei. Kostet nix. Verpflichtet zu nix. Wir freuen uns auf Dich!

Du triffst uns beim offenen Abend, mittwochs ab 18 Uhr und bei der Sprechstunde am Freitag von 16 bis 19 Uhr. Veranstaltungen und sonstige Treffen stehen im Kalender. Wenn Du etwa einmal im Monat über unsere Veranstalltungen informiert werden willst, trag Dich auf unserem E-Mail-Verteiler ein. -- Michael F. Schönitzer 12:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC) für das WikiMUC-Team[reply]