User talk:Yasminkaa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Yasminkaa!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:JLS WIKI.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JLS WIKI.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Gyrostat (talk) 10:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how i can prove that I bought the rights of this pic to the photographer? I bought the pic and the pic is on my computer. I wrote the name of the photographer, Noëlla Barras — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yasminkaa (talk • contribs) 18:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour, la photographe Noëlla Barras a fait un mail en suivant les indications données pour donner la permission d'utiliser ce visuel. Elle m'avait mis en copie de ce mail et de la réponse automatique avec une référence de suivi:[Ticket#2021040710006471] Le voici, merci Yasminkaa (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)yasminkaa[reply]



Forwarded message ---------

De : Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Date: mer. 7 avr. 2021 à 12:40 Subject: [Ticket#2021040710006471] Confirmation of receipt (Re: No Subject) To: Noëlla Barras <noellabarras88@gmail.com>


Dear Noëlla Barras,

Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2021040710006471].

Yours sincerely,

The Volunteer Response Team

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 12:42, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Yasminkaa, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Constuction en bois.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Christian, Je vais modifier la photo Construction en bois par une image que j'ai réalisé moi-même de l'ouvrage que j'ai dans ma bibliothèque. C'était d'ailleurs la première photo que j'avais téléchargée mais la qualité n'est pas top.

Concernant, la capture d'écran, j'ai moi-même fait la photo du schéma à partir d'un powerpoint. Comment pourrais-je le montrer autrement? J'ai d'autres visuels de ce schéma pris en conférence ou en visio. Serait-ce acceptable?

Concernant le logo, Je Vois la Vie en Vosges, j'ai créé cette marque en 2009 dans le cadre de mes activités de promotion du territoire des Vosges. Voici le guide de la marque où mon nom est écrit. Je ne sais pas comment le prouver autrement.

Merci de vos avis sur ces contributions de fond iconographqiue, pour lequel je fais pourtant très attention.

Yasminkaa (talk) 08:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)yasminkaa[reply]

Bonjour Christian Ferrer, concernant le photo du livre sur la construction bois qui est dans ma bibliothèque, puis je en faire une photo pour la publier, je n'ai pas trouver la réponse à cette question précise dans les divers lectures de licence. Par avance, merci Yasminkaa (talk) 22:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)yasminkaa[reply]

  • Bonjour Yasminkaa, le téléchargement d'images sur Wikimedia Commons implique l'utolisation de licenses qui autorisent notamment la réutilisation commerciale, voir com:Scope et com:Licensing. Seul le détenteur des droits d'auteur peut donner son accord pour de telles licences. Donc pour la photo du livre qui est dans votre bibliothèque, la réponse est non, vous ne pouvez pas en publier la photo, à moins que le détenteur des droits d'auteur envoi une permission à notre système de permission. Pour les photos qui ont déjà été publié quelque part c'est pareil, il faut soit que la page web d'origine possède la licence adéquate, soit qu'une permission soit envoyée. Même chose pour le logo, le détenteur des droits d'auteur, même si c'est vous, doit envoyer une permission à notre système de permission. Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour votre patience Christian Ferrer, Dans l'entre temps, j'ai relu les conditions de licences et mis en place les demandes de permissions pour chacune des pièces qui posaient soucis. Concernant la photo de la couverture du livre que j'ai prise, l'auteur du livre a envoyé un mail donnant la permission de l'utiliser. Dans ce même mail, il avait évoqué les deux images et je vois qu'une sur les deux a été régularisée dans l'intervalle (celle de son schéma vert) mais pas celle du livre. Voici le ticket [Ticket#2021041410005805]. Est-ce bien de l'auteur du livre dont vous parlez? si oui, alors la permission est accordée et je ne sais pas comment faire pour restaurer cette image ? Concernant les autres images dans Marketing territorial, je continue mon enquête pour trouver le bon photographe et lui demander sa permission. Ca devrait suivre. Merci encore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yasminkaa (talk • contribs) 09:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Capture d’écran 2021-04-14 à 02.07.02.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Shev123 (talk) 07:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, la permission est en cours d'être formalisée au standard de wikimédia commons. Merci Yasminkaa (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)yasminkaa[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Boutique-vosges-bougie-vegetale-brimbelles-et-mures.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Moumou82.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour voici le numero de Ticket#2021041510011225 de la part du Photograohe de ce visuel, Wilfried Hubert, merci --Yasminkaa (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Moumou82 Bonjour, avais tu pu vérifier le ticket avec la permission de l'auteur ? Je vois maintenant que le visuel a été supprimé. Est-ce possible de le restaurer ou pas? Merci Yasminkaa (talk) 07:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, je ne suis pas un agent VRT donc je n'ai pas accès aux tickets. La discussion se fait mais tu sembles déjà au courant. Moumou82 (talk) 08:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Anne-Claire Goulon.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Anne-Claire Goulon.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

IndrajitDas 08:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, voici le numéro de ticket de la permission de l'auteur [Ticket#2021042310008732], le photographe Michel Laurent m'a envoyé directement cette photo par mail et vous la aussi mise en copie. Voici son mail m.laurent@wanadoo.fr pour la tracabilité. Meci et bonne journée, --Yasminkaa (talk) 09:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Julius Natterer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Voici le mail de permission de l'auteur envoyé le 22/04/2021 à 20h39

Le 22.04.21 20:39, « jonas@nvbcom.fr » <jonas@nvbcom.fr> a écrit :

   Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et 
   exclusif de l'œuvre Julius Natterer.jpg
   Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence: CC 
   BY-SA 4.0
   
   Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon 
   œuvre dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des 
   exigences imposées par la licence.
   
   Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur 
   mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes 
   de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne 
   me seront pas attribuées.
   
   Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits 
   patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers 
   quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans 
   la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque 
   déposée, etc.
   
   Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image 
   est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe 
   quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia.
   
   
   22 avril 2021, Jonas Tophoven
   
   <DATE, NOM CIVIL DE L'AYANT-DROIT ET COORDONNÉES>
   22 avril 2021, Jonas Tophoven, 55 rue St Jacques, 75005 Paris, 
   jonas@nvbcom.fr

Merci et bonne réception --Yasminkaa (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC) Bonjour, voici le numéro de Ticket#2021042210010651 --Yasminkaa (talk) 11:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Lina Ghotmeh.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Lina Ghotmeh.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lina Ghotmeh.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 18:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marie Schweitzer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

jdx Re: 13:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello jdx , this second ticket number or the photograph [Ticket#2021081110013331] with his complete data and permission. Is it okay now? --Yasminkaa (talk) 20:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Christophe Piochon.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Christophe Piochon.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 19:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, Jan Krissler sent you directly a message with permission on your talk page. Yasminkaa (talk) 20:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Authorization must come from the photographer, not from the person we see on the picture. Moumou82 (talk) 10:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Moumou82 Oui mais je crois qu'il explique le tout dans son mail sur une réponse à @Yann que c'est sa caméra de son événement qui a filmé et que lui m'a fait une capture d'écran. Yasminkaa (talk) 12:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Voici le [Ticket#2022050110001795] avec la permission de Jan Krissler qui est le détenteur des droits. Comment faire pour restaurer l'image? Yasminkaa (talk) 09:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Le Peuple du Bois.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann Hello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:FBC 2022 LM-D5L 3565.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YannHello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Christophe Piochon officiel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Christophe Piochon officiel.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann Bonjour et voici le ticket avec la permission du détenteur des droits de la photo officielle, Christophe Piochon, président de Bugatti, lui -même sur la photo. [Ticket#2022050210004923]. Merci de me dire si cela vous convient. Bonne journée Yasminkaa (talk) 14:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emmanuel Macron au Forum Bois Construction 2021.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YannJe joins ici le [Ticket#2022050110001553] avec la permission de Nicole Valkyser-Bergmann. Yasminkaa (talk) 07:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Si la photo est de Nicole Valkyser-Bergmann, alors il ne faut pas la lister comme un travail personnel de ta part. Moumou82 (talk) 10:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Moumou82 Oui c'est bien une photo prise par moi de Nicole Valkyser-Bergmann pendant son échange avec le président Macron. Elle donne son autorisation en plus du fait que j'ai déjà tout renseigner quand j'ai téléviser. Que dois-je faire de plus? Yasminkaa (talk) 12:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Avec toi as-tu pris cette photo ? Il n'y a aucune métadonnée comme ici, or n'importe quel téléphone ou appareil photo numérique en fournit. Moumou82 (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Moumou82Non, je ne suis pas sur la photo c'est Nicole Valkyser-Bergmann et une de ses collègues. Mais Nicole est déjà en discussion avec une personne, je pense qu'elle va bien lui expliquer. Yasminkaa (talk) 14:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Moumou82@YannVoici, c'est réglé pour celle-ci. Ce we, j'aurais passé plus de temps à justifier qu'à contribuer. Pour celle-ci, pour en revenir au point de départ.
Pour les autres visuels, je ne connaissais pas le "derivative work" donc je ferais plus attention dorénavant. Pour les cas suivants pointés par Yann, j'attends les retours des architectes, une a déjà répondu, j'ai mis le ticket en dessous, j'en ferais de même pour les suivantes. Yasminkaa (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Marie Schweitzer Bois Luxe.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, I confirme this is my own work to illustrate the topic. Yasminkaa (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann Bonjour, voici le [Ticket#2022050110002811] avec l'autorisation de l'architecte Marie Schweitzer pour l'utilisation de ce visuel dans sa page. Yasminkaa (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Steven Ware Auditorium Ephémère.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, this is my own work to illustrate the topic. Yasminkaa (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YannHello, voici le ticket de Steven Ware pour cette photo avec le plan. Est-ce ok ainsi? Merci de votre confirmation. Yasminkaa (talk) 16:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[Ticket#2022050210005655] Yasminkaa (talk) 18:28, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:FBC 2022 LM-D5L 3642.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YannHello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello , Please refer to the ticket [Ticket#2022043010001876] from Michel Laurent, photographer, who gave me permission to upload the referenced images to wikicommons. Thank you Yasminkaa (talk) 07:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Please read the information about copyright and licencing on Commons before you proceed uploading images. Kind regards, Ellywa (talk) 08:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Hello @Ellywa@Jeff G. Please check with User:Quaenuncabibis in charge of the EPFL WIKI PROJECT because he explained to me that if I need some pictures to illustrate some articles in this project, I could use the open media source from EPFL, only the pic of Alain Herzog or Jamani Caillet. I did some translation of EPFL wiki article and create some pages about the Campus.
Concerning the pic of File:Lorraine Pierrat.jpg, please check the [Ticket#2022012310002198] because the photographer sent an email with permission to wikicommons.
Thanks you for checking.
Please User:Quaenuncabibis, could you confirm it? Thanks Yasminkaa (talk) 19:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And I confirm again that this one is my own work File:Batiment Vortex vue de l'intérieur.jpg. Yasminkaa (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright status[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. --Yann (talk) 08:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dear Yann, don't worry, I take copyright and image rights very seriously. I have checked and made sure for each of the files I put in that I had the permission or I put in that I didn't know.
Some of the images are my own work, others already have the ticket as a reference and I will try to give you the proof for each of the inserted documents.
Thank you for your understanding. Yasminkaa (talk) 20:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour @Yann, j'ai désormais apposé tous les numéros de tickets avec les permissions sous les photos dans cette page. Pourrais-tu s'il te plait vérifier que tout est en ordre? J'ai vu que certains ont déjà été pris en compte, d'autres pas encore. Et surtout la photo de Jan Krissler a été supprimée malgré sa permission donnée (alors je pense qu'elle n'est arrivée que ce matin donc ça s'est sans doute croisé).
Concernant les photos de la médiathèque EPFL @Flor WMCHa lancé une démarche pour que soit clarifiée la procédure de l'usage de ses photos, notamment en pinguant @Quaenuncabibis. Yasminkaa (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Auvernier Hier et Aujourd'hui.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Auvernier Hier et Aujourd'hui verso.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 15:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Le Peuple du Bois.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madame de Charrière à Colombier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @1Veertje, même argument que le livre de Colombier. merci Yasminkaa (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please add that to the discussion page. Vera (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Baignoire d'Elisabeth d'Autriche peinte par Philippe Visson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, j'ai fait cette photo dans le cadre du GLAM TOUR DE MONTREUX avec WMCH et WMDE dans le but de récupérer des données et étoffer les connaissances. Cette photo en fait partie. --Yasminkaa (talk) 16:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the DR in its discussion page. Vera (talk) 18:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Live from Montreux Vol 1.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 15:43, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @1Veertje, ce visuel a été créé par les organisateurs du Festival de Montreux Jazz Festival qui ont co-organisé le GLAM TOUR DE MONtreux avec WMCH et WMDE pour étoffer l'information sur Montreux. Que faire pour le prouver? leur demande une permission officielle? Yasminkaa (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The cover of the book is protected by copyright. You can't publish other's work under a free license, this is derivative work Vera (talk) 18:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Madame Visson présente une oeuvre de son défunt mari.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Madame Visson présente une oeuvre de son défunt mari.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Oeuvre présentée à l'occasion d'une soirée hommage au peintre.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Oeuvre présentée à l'occasion d'une soirée hommage au peintre.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Oeuvre présentée à l'occasion d'une soirée hommage au peintre à Prilly.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]