User talk:Yann/archives 41

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Marie-Renée Ucciani : peintre et sculpteur

Bonjour, Je prend contact avec vous sur le conseil de O.Taris dont le message suit ci-dessous :

"Marie-Renée Ucciani (peintre et sculpteur). Bonjour, De nombreux tableaux et sculptures de Marie-Renée Ucciani ont été supprimés de Wikipédia en raison de manques d'informations de ma part. Certains ont été retirés bien que j'ai pensé avoir donné les indications nécessaires au motif de "moins de 70 ans et pas dans le domaine public", alors que ma qualité de petit fils et seul détenteur des droits a été reconnu. Je regrette qu'aucune aquarelle de Marie-Renée n'ait été retenue telle l'église de Tougéville dans le Calvados. Que puis-je faire comme démarche qui soit simple et non conflictuelle. Cordialement. --Pierre-Dominique 10 juin 2018 à 08:41 (CEST)"

Bonjour,

Je pense que le plus simple est de contacter un administrateur de Wikimedia Commons comme Thibaut120094 (page de discussion sur Commons) ou Yann (page de discussion sur Commons) par exemple. O.Taris (discuter) 10 juin 2018 à 22:08 (CEST)

Si il est certain que j'ai certainement eu tendance à mettre trop d'oeuvres, peinture ou sculpture, j'en suis revenu à vouloir faire figurer un échantillon représentatif de son oeuvre. Les documents que j'ai apportés sur Wikipédia et Wikipedia communs ont été laissés ou détruits sans que je comprenne la raison et ceux qui persistent sur Wikipédia ne sont peut être pas les plus représentatifs de son oeuvre (aussi modeste soit-elle). Comment puis-je procéder pour rectifier et remettre certains de ceux qui ont été retirés. Cordialement. --Pierre-Dominique 05:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pierre-Do Lo Meo: Bonjour,

Pourriez-vous envoyer une autorisation pour les œuvres de Marie-Renée Ucciani via COM:OTRS/fr ? Il faudrait modifier votre signature pour qu'elle contiennent un lien vers votre page perso ou vers votre page de discussion. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:20, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann,

Je vous remercie de votre réponse par retour. Je suis sur le départ pour la Corse où je n'ai pas d'accès internet autre que mon iPhone. Je reprend contact avec vous dès mon retour fin juin. J'essaierai de comprendre et faire ce que vous m'indiquez ci-dessus (mais suis loin de maîtriser Wikipédia ni même l'informatique). Cordialement. --Pierre-Dominique 07:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Review needed

Not sure why, but a picture I uploaded was tagged for review. Will you take a look File:Venna Lee and L.F. Wilson (1970s).jpg at it, please? Atsme 📞 19:37, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Atsme, currently colleague Yann cannot reply, as there has been a problem with several admin-accounts on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my - sorry to hear that, but thank you for advising, Túrelio. Atsme 📞 23:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 10:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Translation notification: Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n

Hello Yann,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to French on Wikimedia Commons. The page Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n is available for translation. You can translate it here:

translate to French

The priority of this page is high.

This month the UNESCO Wiki Loves Earth photo contest takes place. For this photo contest we need an small update in the file marker template. Thank you!

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 09:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Why did you delete the image of Hyrule?

There are plenty of Zelda images on wikipedia, why does the image of Hyrule Kingdom breach copyright? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BotW_Champions%27_Ballad_Hyrule_Castle.png

Editorguy117 (talk) 11:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editorguy117: This is a screenshot from a video game, and therefore under a copyright, as derivative work. A permission from the copyright owner is needed to upload this on Commons. It can be uploaded under a fair use rationale on the English Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User: Boom Jayson

Please take a look at the other uploads by user Boom Jayson (talk · contribs). All of them look like copyvio and user has marked them as own work. Thank you. // sikander { talk } 14:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yann !

Hello ! In several cases it is not easy to ask all families to prove in Wikimedia they given portraits of their fathers or grand-fathers. Please delete all this portraits. Some of my maps (for example Ligne Jirecek.jpg and Valaques-Vlachs.jpg) are just french translations of my colleague Bogdan Giuşcă's english files (as mentioned) [1] and [2]. I show Sting (Eric Gaba) as source of my actualised "Mediterranean sea physical & political map.png" (with Montenegro ; .png because I can't modify an .svg map) : now it is deleted, and we have only the not actualised Eric Gaba's (Sting) map without Montenegro from 2008 here [3]. About my dinosaurs, I explained (vainly) that Genusaurus01.jpg and Lophostropheus4.jpg are my drawings of my book Miroirs de la Terre (writer Stephen Giner) [4] and the site cited by Elcobbola, MonacoMatin, is not my source but my follower : they wrote under my drawing "montage I. Chepleanu" and the photographies of C. Keilany-Priam concerned the persons showed in this article, not my dinosaurs drawings (please verify here [5]). Concretely if any other site uses an image that I downloaded on Commons, it is he who becomes the owner and I the thief, even in the cases when the image is mine (drew or photographied by me). File:Alani-map.jpg were an improved version of Abou Ben Adhem's 2006 [6] (as mentioned). Now it is deleted and we have only the Abou Ben Adhem's 2006 version (also threatened) without the Iasses. About the geophysical backgrounds (File:Br. Chilia.jpg, File:Br. Chilia.jpg and File:Musura.jpg) my sources were NASA Worldwind and NASA Earth observatory [7] and DEMIS Mapserver (as mentioned) but today this links are broken and I don't know how technically to prove my good faith. Anyway I'm sick and retired from Wiki, so do for the best, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann, je vois que vous êtes francophone. Ca va faciliter les choses. Durant ma période wiki, j'ai fait pour le mieux mais je ne suis ni un expert en informatique, ni un bon connaisseur des règles. Le fait que j'ai souvent coché ((own)) sans plus de précision, que je désapprouve ouvertement la non-liberté de panorama, l'interdiction des travaux dérivés (très nécessaires en cartographie et sciences) et, en art, qu'un créateur reste propriétaire de son oeuvre après l'avoir vendue ou mise dans un espace public (de moins en moins public à vrai dire), a certainement contribué à dresser contre moi des contributeurs-créateurs. Ainsi Elcobbola semble convaincu de ma mauvaise foi et me traite de charlatan et de voleur, malgré l'absence de tout enjeu intellectuel, financier ou d'égo dans tout ceci. Du point de vue rationnel, j'approuve l'effacement de ceux de mes téléchargements qui risquent de mettre juridiquement Commons dans l'embarras. Mais je déplore que l'on efface de simples traductions, adaptations ou montages dont j'ai précisé les sources. Du point de vue émotionnel, tout m'indiffère, un de ces jours je ne serai plus là, que mes (nos) successeurs fassent pour le mieux et se débrouillent. Bonne continuation, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spiridon Ion Cepleanu : Je sais que les règles des droits d'auteur sont tordues et compliquées. Malheureusement, il est difficile de faire autrement. J'essaie souvent de trouver un moyen de les contourner, tout en restant dans la légalité. Une bonne partie des documents supprimés pourraient être gardés si les informations complètes étaient fournies. Pour les liens cassés, c'est quelquefois possible de les prouver avec Internet Archive. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr user Seeminglee DR

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"48973657@N00"

Not sure this should be closed already, I asked the photographer what we actually wants, I think it would be nice to at least give him a few days to answer that. Even if it won't affect our decision, just out of courtesy. It took him 2-3 days to respond to my Flickrmail so he's not very fast.

On a technical note: Eugenio Hansen had inserted a new section header, as a result you only kept File:Kiss in Black and White 20091219.7D.01550.P1.L1.SQ.BW SML (4211914177).jpg but the other 1109 files still have a deletion template. So if you decide to temporarily re-open the DR to wait for a response from Seeminglee, it won't be very hard because all deletion templates except for one are still there. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 20:32, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, my intention was to close only this one. It is a bad idea to have such a big DR with different issues. I reverted my closure, and added a comment. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Eugenio Hansen did not actually create a DR for that file, he just inserted a section header into the existing DR as a comment for no obvious reason. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible that this user simply didn't understand that the file was being nominated because of what was written in other files, and as the list of files is so long maybe they simply created a new section header to edit more easily without having to scroll too much. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finish deleteting

Why deletion of these subjects has not completed:

File:Sergei Prokofiev-TIME-1945.jpg

File:Kliment Voroshilov-TIME-1934.jpg ‎

File:Joseph Stalin-TIME-1945.jpg ‎

File:Kremlin Courier-TIME-1951.jpg‎

File:Lavrenty Beria-TIME-1948.jpg‎

File:Vasily Stalin-TIME-1951.jpg

--Maher27777 (talk) 09:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maher27777: It will be taken care in due time. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photographie « Laurent Cunasc »

Bonsoir, Yann ! Jospe a reconnu que l'article Laurent Cunasc sur WP était un canular. Pourrais-tu STP supprimer l'image qui était censée illustrer le sujet, Laurent Cunasc c.1870.jpg ? (Pas la peine de faire une RfD, je pense...) Nomen ad hoc (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Il y a aussi ce blason et ce manoir imaginaires. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Une demande de suppression est préférable. C'est fait. Yann (talk) 22:11, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci ! Par ailleurs, je ne savais pas qu'on pouvait transférer les canulars en sous-page de l'espace Wikipédia... c'est une bonne idée, je tâcherai d'y penser si j'en recroise un de bonne facture

. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 01:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Salut. Maintenant que j'y repense, il y aurait peut-être un autre canular que j'avais détecté et qui était pas mal (on pourrait peut-être le récupérer en sous-page aussi) : Ibn P. Assidim. Je te laisse voir, moi je peux rien faire sans les outils... Nomen ad hoc (talk) 10:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Nomen ad hoc : Je ne suis pas admin sur Wikipédia en français. Il faut demander à Vigneron. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah désolé, j'ai cru. Cordialement. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 12:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

File:Lokalov Aleksey Vasilievich.jpg.

Hello, I have no experience of publishing on Wikipedia. The portrait of Alexei Lokalov was made in 1870, copyright does not apply to it. I found and attributed the original photo: http://velikoemuseum.ru/portrety-vladeltsev-i-direktorov-gavrilov-yamskoj-manufaktury-i-chelovek-kotoryj-eti-portrety-sohranil/ Image uploaded from my site: http://velikoemuseum.ru/kustarnaya-promyshlennost-sela-velikogo-v-xix-v-i-formirovanie-fabrichnyh-proizvodstv/ Please restore the photo. Please tell me how to publish the page in Wikipedia.

Sincerely, Yamskoykraved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamskoikraeved (talk • contribs) 07:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamskoikraeved: Hi,

I added a license. You can do it yourself next time. For Wikipedia, you have to ask there: en:Wikipedia:Help desk. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I have not violated Copyright.

Hi, we as an international organization for fair and unbiased information output, have not violated any copyright violation. We will continue to do as we have done until this is recognized. The image of Nikias was a NEWLY EDITED photograph produced by the author's group at the University of Southern California. Why are you restricting our constitutional right of freedom of speech? You are violating human rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astronomyaviation (talk • contribs) 16:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Astronomyaviation: Hi,

It seems you are not the copyright holder of the images you upload, therefore they are copyright violations. Do not upload any content without a formal written permission, or you might be blocked. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Astronomyaviation: Hi,

Further to what User:Yann wrote, the photographer himself/herself is free to upload the photo in question to Wikimedia Commons as he/she is the copyright holder (ie, the copyright has not been assigned (or sold) to some other person (or organisation)). Martinvl (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

photos

dear yann, these photos are mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josesantaclara (talk • contribs) 21:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Josesantaclara: Hi,

At least this one has a watermark "tatianaphotographos.com". And as for all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:JayyyyMLG666

JayyyyMLG666 (talk · contribs) has uploaded new copyright violations since you gave him a "last warning". World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

Hello! I downloaded the same file several times, because I'm 100% sure of the copyright of the person I'm pointing to. The reference to the article that was thrown to me is not the original source of this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlenaLya (talk • contribs) 03:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AlenaLya: Hi,

You are not allowed to upload files made by others without a formal written permission from them. A permission is also needed for all content previously published elsewhere. If you have permission, please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iris Pérez portrait.jpg

Bonjour Yann, voici le nom du fichier qu'une admin a enlevé. Néanmoins, un ticket OTRS a été envoyé par Candida Perez Romero le 2 avril. Merci d'avance pour ton aide.--Galahmm (talk) 11:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Galahmm,

Le fichier a été restauré, et l'autorisation a été ajoutée. Pour File:Iris Pérez.jpg, il faudrait soit envoyer une autorisation, ou mieux, importer l'image originale, et non une version réduite. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Yann. Tu as restauré le fichier PORTRAIT, n'est-ce pas? yupi! merci!!! Pour le fichier File:Iris Pérez.jpg j'aimerai le supprimer de wiki commons... --Galahmm (talk) 19:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Galahmm: Ce n'est pas moi qui est restauré le fichier. J'ai supprimé le deuxième, comme demandé. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

merci --Galahmm (talk) 21:52, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Licences

Bonjour Yann,

Je vous serais reconnaissant de bien vouloir ne pas modifier les licences de mes petits bonhommes de Nadar.

Le bandeau "Gallica" que vous utilisez n'indique rien sur le fait que le document est dans le DP. Le mien, si. Quant au bandeau "PD-old-100-1923", il n'est pas conforme à mon choix.

Ou alors, soyez aimable de m'expliquer où et en quoi je me trompe, car je n'ai pas l'intention de changer jusque'à présent, et vous allez avoir du boulot !

Bonne continuation.

Merci.

--Jebulon (talk) 15:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Jebulon,

J'essaie de mettre de l'ordre dans les fichiers provenant de Gallica : Category:Images from Gallica to be checked. Les modèles devraient être remplacés par {{Gallica}}, qui est celui le plus utilisé. Maintenant pour File:Arnauné, Auguste, Nadar, Gallica.jpg, il n'y a plus de licence. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 03:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+1

. Pour le fichier ci-dessus, il y a le bandeau PD-retouched-user, qui indique que l'image de base est dans le domaine public et que la retouche a été mise dans le domaine public. Ne te convient-il pas ? Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 07:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

À mon avis, ce n'est pas suffisant. Il faut indiquer pourquoi le fichier est dans le domaine public. Dans ce cas, parce que l'auteur est mort il y a plus de 100 ans (pour la France) et qu'il a été publié avant 1923 (pour États-Unis). Le statut légal ne dépend pas de l'importateur, mais du créateur. Il est le même que ce soit Jebulon, moi, ou n'importe qui d'autre qui importe le fichier sur Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, je comprends ce que tu veux dire et je suis d'accord. Il faut donc deux licences, l'une pour l'oeuvre sous-jacente, PD-old-100-1923 par exemple, et l'autre pour la retouche. Ca te va comme ça ? Incidemment, le modèle PD-retouched-user est agaçant parce qu'il force à l'emploi d'un second paramètre renvoyant à un wiki, alors qu'il serait plus simple de ne mettre que le nom d'utilisateur sur Commons. Saurais-tu arranger ça ? Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 10:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Une restauration ne crée pas de nouveaux droits, au moins en droit français et en droit américain (je ne suis pas sûr dans d'autres cas). Et vu que l'on importe des images restaurées par des tiers sans leur attribuer des droits, il me semble mal venu de le faire si le restaurateur est un contributeur de Commons. Ce qui n'empêche pas de créditer les restaurateurs, quels qu'ils soient. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:33, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour.

Je ne souhaite pas utiliser le bandeau {{Gallica}}, vraiment très pauvre, qui en effet n'indique rien au sujet du statut de l'oeuvre. Le fait qu'il soit "le plus utilisé" ne change rien à l'affaire (argument d'autorité), c'est juste regrettable. le bandeau que j'utilise {{PD-BNF}} est pour moi beaucoup plus adéquat, car justement, il indique que la BNF considère que le document en question est dans le Domaine Public, ce que je me garde bien de discuter, n'ayant pas les compétences de cette institution pour en décider. Ce statut est visible dans la fiche d'information du document. Plus d'infos vaut mieux que peu d'infos. Voilà pour l’œuvre d'origine.

Commençant à devenir un vieux de la vieille dans ces pages, et étant quelque peu juriste dans la vraie vie (quoi que "Commons" soit aussi la vraie vie, pas vrai ?), je sais très bien qu'une restauration n'engendre aucun droit nouveau pour le restaurateur. Cela va sans dire, mais cela va encore mieux en le disant. C'est pourquoi Racconish m'a convaincu de l'adéquation du modèle {{PD-retouched-user}} à ce que je souhaitais dire. La combinaison des deux me va bien. Je ne revendique aucun droit sur mes restaurations, la meilleure preuve, c'est que je les plaçais jusqu'à présent en CC0, fautivement semble-t-il.

Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 13:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jebulon, deux petites remarques. Tout d'abord, {{Gallica}} est plutôt un modèle pour indiquer la source de l'image, qui catégorise l'image comme provenant de Gallica. Par ailleurs, {{PD-BNF}} est un peu faible. Il y a eu beaucoup de cas où nous nous sommes rendus compte que les jugements de la BNF étaient, comment dire, un peu hasardeux. Il est donc préférable de faire une analyse des raisons pour lesquelles le fichier est dans le domaine public, par exemple PD-old-70-1923. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 13:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jebulon and Racconish: En fait, il y a 3 modèles pour le même usage, ce qui en fait 2 de trop. Et {{ARK-BNF}} n'indique que "Bibliothèque nationale de France". Je pense que tu veux parler de {{PD-BNF}} qui dit effectivement que la BNF considère le document dans le domaine public. Le fait de confondre les 2 modèles montre qu'il faut harmoniser la situation. Une manière de réconcilier les points de vue serait d'ajouter l'information à {{Gallica}}. Qu'en pensez-vous ? Pour moi, il est plus important d'indiquer le statut légal indépendamment de la BNF, qui se trompe quelquefois (ou préfère ignorer les droits ?). Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personnellement, je préfère {{Gallica}} à {{ARK-BNF}} : plus simple d'emploi. C'est à mon sens seulement un modèle pour les sources et il n'est pas souhaitable d'en compliquer l'usage. Je suggère de n'utiliser {{PD-BNF}} que dans la zone permission, pour donner une information supplémentaire sur l'appréciation portée par la BNF, mais sans que cet emploi du modèle se substitue à ceux usuels pour justifier la déchéance des droits. Sinon, c'est la porte ouverte aux DR de la part de tout contributeur qui ne verrait pas pourquoi la BNF a agi de la sorte. Je vous donne un seul exemple que je connais bien. La BNF considère systématiquement que tout périodique publié il y a plus de 70 ans mais dont la publication s'est terminée depuis est dans le domaine public en tant qu'oeuvre collective. C'est vrai en général mais faux pour toute oeuvre signée. Dans un cas pareil, l'oeuvre n'est pas dans le domaine public parce que la BNF la dit telle, mais parce que l'auteur est mort depuis suffisamment longtemps. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 14:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Télescopages en série dans la conversation (conflits d'édition). Yann, j'avais corrigé avant de te lire: c'est bien de {{PD-BNF}} -et des informations précieuses vers lesquelles il renvoie- que je parle. Il ne dit pas que l'oeuvre est dans le DP, il dit que la BNF considère que l'oeuvre est dans le DP. Ce qui est bien différent. Nous ne sommes pas chargés de superviser les décisions de la BNF quant au statut des oeuvres qu'elle recèle, ils disposent peut-être d'éléments particuliers ignorés par nous mais en revanche on peut lui écrire, ce que je fais souvent (et ils prennent en compte les remarques. Ma récente carte du Groenland était décrite comme étant légendée en Anglais, alors qu'elle l'est en Danois, je le leur ai dit, ils ont corrigé. J'ai aussi identifié quelques anonymes, ce qu'ils ont pris en compte, j'ai une anecdote marrante, mais trop longue)...

Mais vous êtes en train de parvenir à vos fins: me faire entrer dans une discussion que je ne veux pas avoir !

. Ma position est simple. Je ne remettrai pas en cause ce qu'indique la BNF. Je souhaite que tout mon travail soit accessible à tous, librement et sans contrainte. Je ne revendique aucun droit quelconque. Je pense faire oeuvre utile, en ayant illustré un nombre conséquent de biographies jusqu'à présent "aveugles" et j'ai bien l'intention de continuer. Je sais très bien que je ne lèse personne. Je m'adapterai à tout ce qui me permettra de poursuivre dans ce sens, avec les moins de complications possibles. J'aime bien le {{PD-retouched-user}}, sauf qu'il renvoie vers wikipédia et pas vers "Commons" et ça ne me plaît pas. Et voilà.--Jebulon (talk) 14:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, une idée pour améliorer/simplifier ce modèle afin qu'il renvoie seulement à Commons ? — Racconish ^💬 14:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Racconish: Il suffit d'utiliser comme 2^e paramètre 2=c: : [8]. Pour avoir seulement, un lien vers Commons, il suffirait de supprimer le 2^e paramètre. Le mieux serait d'avoir Commons par défaut, et un autre projet en option. C'est fait. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jebulon: Désolé de t'entraîner dans une discussion, mais ce projet étant un wiki, il faut bien discuter pour trouver une solution.

Et c'est bien ce que j'ai dit plus haut : la BNF considère les documents comme étant dans le domaine public. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

« discuter pour trouver une solution », moi je veux bien... encore faut-il qu’il y ait un problème

. Nous sommes d’accord.--Jebulon (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images from Gallica with broken source

Bonjour Yann,

J'ai vu ton échange dans la section précédente ainsi que le message laissé par Jcb sur la pdd de ton nouveau collègue. Puis-je en déduire que les fichiers du domaine public et parfaitement admissibles (comme tu sais, et comme tu sais que je sais que tu sais), contenus dans la catégorie Images from Gallica with broken source, ne seront pas supprimés dans une semaine ? Je peux retracer l'origine des enluminures de la BNF, en précisant le manuscrit, le folio, avec un lien valide et permanent vers Gallica / Mandragore / Biblissima, à condition d'en avoir le temps (i.e. pas d'ici une semaine). Je viens déjà de retracer l'origine d'une demi-douzaine d'entre eux.

Cela dit, bien contente de te recroiser (ça faisait longtemps ) BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 15:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BeatrixBelibaste: Les fichiers ne seront pas supprimés, Jeff a enlevé le bandeau d'avertissement. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vladimir Yatsina.jpg

Hi! Just wanted to give you a head's up about this image. It's very unlikely that the student was given permission to use the image - this looks like the student copied the image from the website without checking to make sure that the CC license was compatible, since they listed the website as the source. They saw the CC license info at the bottom and assumed that it was - it's something that we're trying to work on with students. I figured that by changing the license to the one on the website (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) the image would be speedied. Unfortunately we tend to have students that don't really look at the copyright information all that closely - I try to stay on top of things, but it's not always possible.

On a side note, I can't remember if company logos like File:Linda Avey company.png are OK to upload. I know that some are, if they're entirely text, but this has an image in it. The student also uploaded it as their own work, which I know is incorrect. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ozer nora.png

Szia! Nem tudom, miért kellett elsietned. Megszereztem az engedélyt. Kérlek állítsd vissza a képet. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tambo: Only the copyright holder can be given a valid license. This was published before, so a permission is needed anyway. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Néhány képet már feltöltöttem, és tisztában vagyok a szabályokkal. Kérlek tedd vissza, hogy hivatalosan be tudjam szerezni az engedélyt. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ááá, értem, Tambo, szóval azért töltöttél/töltesz fel tucatszám jogsértő képeket, mert tisztában vagy a szabályokkal. Félek belegondolni, mi lenne, ha még csak tisztában sem lennél a szabályokkal. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 20:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Micehlotti Pura

All the images are mine as I took them and supplied to magazines, the show card was made for for the car which I have owned from new. All materials are mine. But even so if you dont accept magazine articles why do you even block my own photos taken by me personally and from my own files.?? Why do you block my very own photos I took? Your system is not working properly?? The system is OTT! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelotti Pura (talk • contribs) 13:20, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Michelotti Pura: Hi,

Owning a picture or magazine doesn't give the ownership of the copyright. As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Then the files can be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann I have even tried to upload photos of my own taken personally by me and yet you block them why???? Where is the logic of blocking photos taken by myself in my garage with my camera of my car? You have to explain please why they are blocked anyway???? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelotti Pura (talk • contribs) 08:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Michelotti Pura: Please read what I wrote above. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann I wrote That I tried to post a picture I took peronaly with my own camera, of my own car in my own garage and you blocked it. Please explain how I dont own the copyright of a picture I took personally of my car with my own camera??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelotti Pura (talk • contribs) 09:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Michelotti Pura: You didn't read what I wrote. I said As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Then the files can be undeleted. That's the case even if you are the copyright holder of the works. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files with broken source

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:101RueDeGrenelle.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 04:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeff,

I am well aware that the source of these is broken. That's why there are in the category :Category:Images from Gallica with broken source. I am slowly trying to fix, but it will take time... Can you remove the template, or the pages might be deleted. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done, sorry for the inconvenience. You might want a different parent for that cat. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff: OK, what would you suggest? Regards, Yann (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: Since you deleted Category:Images with broken source and Category:Files with broken source, I thought you might have a better solution. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, these categories were empty, likely since August last year. I assumed they got and are senseless. If you have sensfull content for them, just recreate them. regards --Ju Ta 15:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: That's tough to do without the deleted revisions. Can you please restore them and tag the non-redirect {{Empty category}}? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 09:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 10:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and...

Thanks for the block just now, could you also look at LovelyGirl4ever (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user for same reasons? Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellin,

Why could you not do it yourself? Just curious... Also the reason would be different, probably "Abusing multiple accounts". Regards, Yann (talk) 18:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I could, but having asked for help, I feel it is better to put a second set of eyes and another mind to look at the situation rather than one person assuming - and perhaps wrongly. Since I brought it forward, I don't think it's ethical of me to block. There may be no rules or guideline which prevents it, I personally think it is more fair and careful. Cheers!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block Warning

I was given a last warning for copyright violations (which I never intentionally meant to do). Is this warning for after the 'Welcome to Huetter' sign violation? Howpper (talk) 10:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Howpper,

It is for the logos. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skranevatnet (Foto av Silver Song).jpg

I had already been granted permission to upload this image to wikipedia from the copyright owner when I uploaded the image. Could you please restore it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Democracy (talk • contribs) 15:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Mr Democracy: This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: Isn't there a way I can prove that I got permission? I doubt that the copyright owner would bother to fill out that form, when he's already said it's ok as long as I credit his name along with the image. - Mr Democracy (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr Democracy: Unless you have it in writing, on paper, with signature or you were given permission in a public tweet from a verified Twitter account, I don't think so. Sorry. Also, when you upload an image it must be free to use for anyone, not just Wikipedia.

You may be able to upload it to Wikipedia locally, but every language has their own rules regarding this. Consult with the policies from your Wikipedia for this. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Hi Yann,

Please could you help me out?

The images I am posting are taken from public pages on official social media accounts of political parties.

How do I upload them without infringing copyright?

How has it been done on other pages about political parties?

I'd really appreciate your help

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael N Fouad (talk • contribs) 19:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael N Fouad: Hi,

These files are under a copyright. You can upload them on the English Wikipedia under a fair use rationale, but fair use is not allowed on Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

re:Copyright status: File:Watchlist icon.png

It's a screen-cap of the Spanish Wikipedia, so I didn't know what license it had. (The caption and the editing were done by me). ¿What should I do? Thanks in advance,

--Snooze123 (talk) 17:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I tagged it with {{GPL}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Snooze123: should have actually been tagged as {{Wikimedia-screenshot}}. (I fixed it, I was corrected by Storkk a while back for basically the same thing) - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 05:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now re-reading the text of that template but starting to doubt this:

"Please note that the GPL is for software and its derivatives and the GFDL is for text documentations or other forms of text and their derivatives. This means that the interface design of Wikipedia and all other portions of the MediaWiki software are licensed under the GPL, but the actual contents of Wikipedia are licensed under the GFDL."

@Storkk: doesn't that mean File:Commons action throttled ratelimit.png should also be licensed as GPL? The error message (if that's even eligible) is part of the software, not Wikipedia or Commons content. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 05:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, GPL is the right license for this. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Problem

the photos I have uploaded are from the Foundation I work at - GoSports Foundation, Bangalore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intern tushar (talk • contribs) 17:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Intern tushar: Hi,

The copyright holder has to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:25, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am the copyright holder and to whom should i send the permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intern tushar (talk • contribs) 07:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Intern tushar: Please read COM:OTRS. The address is permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann Hi, Is this mandatory, cause we would like to explore the option of not giving away rights for public use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intern tushar (talk • contribs) 11:06, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Intern tushar: yes, this is mandatory. Yann (talk) 12:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Princes Edward, Henry, and Albert Time cover 1927.jpg

Dear Yann..can you help me in saving this file?--Maher27777 (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done I removed the warning. Yann (talk) 15:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedro Tonon Geromel.jpg

Hello, I believe you have requested deletion of this photo by mistake. It was a cut of this other file that was already in Commons under license CC-SA 3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Russia-Brazil_2018_(15).jpg

There was no Copyright violation.

TricoWiki (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TricoWiki: OK, restored. Next time, you should provide the proper license and permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann: I did not realize at that moment... in a good portuguese: "passou batido". Thank you, Yann TricoWiki (talk) 17:50, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beaufort-en-Vallée (49) Église Notre-Dame - intérieur - Baie 28-08.jpg

Yann,

merci d'avoir attiré mon attention sur ces points. J'avais encore la naïveté de penser, pauvre crédule que je suis à imaginer que la technique est infaillible, que le téléchargement de fichiers via UploadWizard duplicait systémaitquement tant la source que l'auteur des fichiers, ce qui en l'espèce n'a pas été le cas pour l'image "Beaufort-en-Vallée (49) Église Notre-Dame - intérieur - Baie 28-08.jpg" qui fait néanmoins l'objet d'un versement groupé comptant pas moins de 15 clichés. Je ne suis malheureusement pas un angliciste chevroné et quand on me parle d'auteur et de source, dans la mesure où je verse essentiellement des images de monuments historiques, je pense immédiatement au problème des droits d'auteur, aux artistes créateurs ayant réalisé l'objet de mes cliché. Double méprise donc, pour laquelle je vais devoir m'excuser auprès de Jcb pour une réaction assez épidemique. J'ai d'ores et déjà ajouté les informations faisant défaut. Bien cordialement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GO69 (talk • contribs)

@GO69: OK, c'est bon maintenant. Merci de signer vos messages. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kapoly church

Hello, Yann! When you closed this DR I thought I’d have a shot at moving the file, even though the nominator hadn’t responded. But when I looked in the Kapoly category I noticed a lower-resolution duplicate, File:Reformed church of Kapoly.jpg, that was uploaded a few days later. I suppose this one has a better name; it’s also more accurately categorized, and it’s in use—but the quality is lower. What’s the best way to proceed: overwrite this file with the higher-resolution image and delete the latter file, or delete this one without a redirect to make room for renaming the better file?—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Odysseus1479! Both photos are my own work. I uploaded the photo the first time as the Roman Catholic church, but then I realized that it is the Reformed church of Kapoly! So I uploaded it again, because I did not know how to change the name of the file from Roman Catholic to Reformed. So you can delete the older one! The new one please leave there! Thanks a lot and sorry for bothering you. - Wiki-wuki (talk) 00:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiki-wuki: the problem I see is that the older one is of better quality (more pixels, at least). We generally prefer the highest resolution that’s available. (For future reference, see COM:RENAME#How to rename a file.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 23:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done I deleted the small copy, and renamed the big one. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

re:Tagging copyvios

Thanks for your message, I have noticed the uploader in italian Wikipedia. Best regards. --Bradipo Lento (talk) 09:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Stupp

Ok--Jack Stupp (talk) 15:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hello Yann (talk). Sir(Madam), this is ridicules accusations. I provide the sources of this maps and it seems to me it is a plot against me personally to shut down my account, because some wiki-mafia bothered by my article and maps.I asked for the help how to upload them properly in the past from those individuals who try to delete all what I upload, but non ofof them respond when I asked for help ,they only respond when they what to delete!Эльбрус Казбекович (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Эльбрус Казбекович: you were blocked on ruwiki for a reason can't read, but the picture on w:ru:Википедия:Многоликость tells me exactly what the reason is. You didn't draw that map. You say you based it on w:Orthodox Encyclopedia but I see no indication that was released with a Creative Commons license. So don't base your work on that. Try openstreetmap next time. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Эльбрус Казбекович: Hi,

You have a long list of deleted files, so a warning is in order. Be aware that if you use some external map as background, this makes your file a derivative work, which retains the copyright of the source. So you can only use 1. maps which are in the public domain (old or NASA, for example), 2. OpenStreetMap as a background, without omitting the credit, 3. maps which are entirely created by yourself. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz, are you advocate for russian wiki? Do you know about fraud and falsification they administration doing constantly over certain things?

I never said I draw that map,this is a very old map from Large Soviet Encyclopedia.Эльбрус Казбекович (talk) 06:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Эльбрус Казбекович: I advocate nothing. Ask anyone! I mostly just rant. If you had properly indicated what you based your map on, why that original map is in the public domain and ideally also uploaded that original map to Commons with a valid license, it probably wouldn't have been deleted. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 07:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tilesweeper cover.jpg

Hello. Deleted file File:Tilesweeper cover.jpg used for page about game Tilesweeper. I'm author of this game (I represent IEVO), which information I must put, that this file was not deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thorbazavr (talk • contribs) 09:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)@Thorbazavr: Please put covers/screenshots you want to use here on http://www.tilesweeper.com/ and add a license to them like CC0, CC BY 4.0 or CC BY-SA 4.0. You can find nice buttons and instructions on https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/. When you have added one of these licenses to the work on your website, you can upload the covers/screenshots here. Link the page on the site that shows the covers/screenshots with license in the source field. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 08:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Media Files

All the media files I have been using have come from my boss who gave me oral permission to use them. He just took them for fun and holds no copyright on them, am I not allowed to use these? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexPeterBertha (talk • contribs) 01:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexPeterBertha: Hi,

Please ask your boss to send a permission for a free license via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock identification

Regarding this block, which other account(s) are related? Feel free to email me if you'd rather avoid revealing too much publicly. DMacks (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind...saw the tag on the user page. DMacks (talk) 15:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

deleted image

HI I do not understand the OTRS, I have permission from the copyright holder to use the image, and I have emailed proof of it to permissions@wikimedia email address but there is no reply. Please tell me where I can send it or show you to prove that I have the right. The image is crucial for an article I created for my grandfather, of his wife (a well known artist) who is recently deceased. Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:470:1F09:B37:64D6:6A93:D696:88C (talk) 21:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, There is quite a backlog, so it will take some time for the permission to be validated. Please be patient, we are all volunteers here. Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:470:1F09:B37:0:0:0:C392 (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading new versions for license reviewed files

While trying to address broken sources for files in Category:Images from the Indian government with broken source, I uploaded higher resolution images for two files that have already undergone license review: File:Prakash Javdekar taking charge as minister.jpg and File:Sanjay Mitra, IAS with Nirmala Sitharaman, Jojneswar Sharma and Lt. General M. M. Naravane.jpg. Should I remove the license review tags to trigger a new review for these cases? —Gazoth (talk) 04:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gazoth,

No, it is OK. The review applies equality to low and high resolutions. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock (vandal) upload

Hello Yann,

Apparently File:Gael Duval (officiel) 4.jpg is a legitimate upload with correct permission, as you placed the missing permission template I would actually ask you to check out this page, and since the pictured individual is notable I would also like to withdraw my deletion request on the picture. The license was correctly listed by the uploading vandal per "Official pictures of Gaël Duval ! (images licence: CC BY-SA 4.0)". Cheers, --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done OK, fixed. Yann (talk) 11:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, have a nice day.

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data on Commons IRC Office Hour, Tuesday 26 June

Greetings,

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Tuesday, 26 June from 18:00-19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find more details, as well as date and time conversion, at the IRC Office Hours page on Meta.

Thanks, I look forward to seeing you there if you can make it. -- Keegan (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations warning

Um, I think you are confused - I have never been warned and none of my uploads have ever been deleted as copyright violations.

My talk page currently features a bunch of warnings about images that I tagged for deletion, because Thescrubbythug, a new user who doesn't understand copyright (he thought all images from the National Archives of Australia were instantly public domain), pasted all his warnings (from my tagging them) to my talk page while asking me to explain what he'd done wrong.

Please remove the warning from my talk page. This was a particularly rude thing to wake up to, and a poor way to treat people who go to the trouble of coming over from enwiki to get rid of copyright violations. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These are not my warnings - or about my uploads. Check the edit history. You are absolutely out of line - and I expect an apology. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:19, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The Drover's Wife: No, I am not confused. You have a long list of warnings on your talk page, and of deleted files because of copyright violations. Never to do that again, or you will be blocked. Also do not remove warnings from your talk page. You can archive it. For that, see my message. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read what I am saying: I cannot make this any clearer.

I did not upload those files. I reported them. In this edit to my talk page, the user who did upload them, Thescrubbythug, copied and pasted all his warnings to my talk page while he was asking me to explain what he had done wrong.

This is an absolutely cooked way to treat good editors who come here to report copyright violations. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised the issue at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. I am at a loss for what to do here - this is simply the most bizarre exchange I have ever had (much less with an admin) in several years of editing on Wikimedia projects. If you won't look either look at my contributions or look at the diffs that I have provided to show that you're accusing me of something I very obviously didn't do, then another administrator needs to come in and deal with your poor behaviour. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The Drover's Wife: OK, but do you also claim that the list of deleted files is not yours? Regards, Yann (talk) 22:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)@Yann: That list of deleted files is only visible to admins. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)(bis) One would also expect to see redlinks in the user log, which is visible to non-admins, but all I see there are blue.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 23:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see my own deleted files as I'm not an administrator - but no, I have never had an upload deleted for copyright violations. Look at my talk page history - in six years of having a Commons account, it hadn't even had more than a welcome until Thescrubbythug's post yesterday. Where are these supposed warnings? It's very possible that images might have been deleted for housekeeping reasons, but that would be the only reason. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The Drover's Wife: OK, you are right. My apologies. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - although I'm not sure "my apologies" quite cuts it after how very out of line your behaviour was here. This was so unbecoming of an admin that if you were on enwiki I'd be initiating dispute resolution processes - I really hope you're more careful in future. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)@The Drover's Wife: You can go here. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker)@The Drover's Wife: Yann initially dropped the ball here, that's true, on the other hand it's very unusual for a user to copy their warnings to another talk page. It's a strange situation.

Yann, I'm very curious what filenames are listed on Special:DeletedContributions/The Drover's Wife? Since their upload log is all blue, I wouldn't expect anything there? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They are the files by Thescrubbythug, and nominated by The Drover's Wife. That's what confused me. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

apa masalah engkau deknon

Apa masalah engkau dok delete2 pic yang aku upload? Pic yang aku letak tu orang yang aku kenal tahu tak. Artis Ifa Raziah & Bienda tu pun kenal aku siapa. Please lah jangan nak semak aku nak upload pic artis aku kat wikipedia dorang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emiesyahmie (talk • contribs) 12:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Emiesyahmie: Hi,

You are not allowed to upload pictures not taken by you without a formal written permission from the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ReːFiles without a page

So how can i fix it? --Prosperity Horizons (talk) 21:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prosperity Horizons: Either you have to create the pages manually, or reupload the files. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:53, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Erreur

Salut! Je viens de voir votre message sur ma discussion.

Je crois qu'il y a un problème sur la page de Wikipedia en Espagnol, parce que j'ajoute le code aux articles de Wikipedia, mais les armoiries ne sont pas visibles. C'est un peu bizarre. Je vous donne un exemple.

Si vous allez regarder le code de cette page, vous pourrez voir le tag "Escudo" et le fichier, mais ça ne marche pas. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_(Huesca)

Par contre, il y a d'autres pages où le code marche. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torre_del_Mar

J'espère que vous puissiez m'aider! Merci d'avance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcshia (talk • contribs) 21:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcshia: Je ne pense pas que ce soit lié. C'est autre chose. Désolé. Yann (talk) 21:53, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larrk_tqf8rku-mr_m8hvqvo.jpg

Hi, I can't find any discussion on the deletion of the file Larrk_tqf8rku-mr_m8hvqvo.jpg when I search prefix:Commons:Deletion requests/. Apparently you deleted it according to CommonsDelinker (Removing "Larrk_tqf8rku-mr_m8hvqvo.jpg", it has been deleted from Commons by Yann because: Copyright violation, see c:Commons:Licensing). Aarghdvaark (talk) 00:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is COM:NETCOPYVIO. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Tagging copyvios

thanks, I'll try. The problem is that my level of English is minimal :-( --Pil56 (talk) 11:54, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What properties does Commons need?

Greetings,

Structured Commons will need properties to make statements about files. The development team is working on making the software ready to support properties; the question is, what properties does Commons need?

You can find more information and examples to help find properties in a workshop on Commons. Please participate and help fill in the list, and let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I keep finding these vandals on my watch list who need rollbacking but have to manually undo their edits, do you think that if I were to request the rollback right that I would have a realistic chance of getting it or do you think that my block on Meta will be a sign of "untrustworthiness" as I know that users who aren't welcome on other projects often don't get any rights here, or should I just report those vandals exclusively and not waste my time manually undoing their edits one-by-one, I mean even the worst vandals make good content additions every while (the upload in a prior conversation above stands testament of that), and I actually check their contributions before requesting a roll back (post-block). Anyhow I would rather know my chances first before getting a harsh reject. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trung 『徵國單』: Yes, sure. Please ask for the right. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for the advice. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

J'aimerai avoir un conseil

Bonjour, je me permet de vous contacter car je suis bloqué sur Wikipédia (pseudo : Siren) ainsi que ma page de discussion. Voir ici : fr:Wikipédia:Bulletin des administrateurs/2018/Semaine 26#Contributeur problématique. Je me sens victime d'un déni de justice et vais être jugé (!) alors que je ne peux pas me défendre. J'ai vu à plusieurs endroit : "contactez un administrateur par Email" mais comment faire, où est l'adresse de l'Email (Azurfrog ou Samyday par exemple) ? Si vous avez une procédure à m'expliquer, j'en serai très heureux. Sinon pouvez vous m'indiquer à qui m'adresser ? Merci à l'avance. - Siren-Com (talk) 14:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Siren-Com : Bonjour, Le mail est dans la colonne de gauche "Envoyer un courriel à cet utilisateur". Mais si vous êtes bloqué, vous n'y aurez peut-être pas accès.

Pour le fond, il y a des sujets auxquels je ne toucherais pas, même avec une cuillère avec un manche de 3 mètres. Et ce d'autant plus quand je vois qui sont les autres participants. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, en effet, j'avais jamais remarqué... mais j'ai même pas accès aux mails, j'espère que je vais quand même pouvoir exposer ma position à un moment sinon c'est pire que les procès de Moscou ! Sinon, il me reste "Commons" en attendant des jours meilleurs ! Bien cordialement. - Siren-Com (talk) 22:07, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revue bleue Série 4 Tome 20 - 1903.djvu.djvu

Bonjour,

Pourrais-tu svp renommer ce fichier. Il y a

.djvu

en trop

Je ne comprends trop pourquoi, ce n'est pas moi qui le met, il s'ajoute seulement quand le fichier est téléversé.

Merci

--Le ciel est par dessus le toit (talk) 12:28, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Le ciel est par dessus le toit:

Fait Yann (talk) 12:56, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci --Le ciel est par dessus le toit (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In spanish please!!

Hi my friend, No sé que me escribiste en my User talk:Cristian cda, pero por lo poco que entiendo es que, los archivos que subí están en falta, y creo que se debe a que he copiado archivos mediante capturas y luego los he subido en otra wiki... pero mi problema es que mi conexion a la web es por un filtro que no me permite ingresar a la página que se utiliza para realizar los pases de una a otra wiki, y es la única manera en que puedo hacerlo, PERDÓN AMIGO!!!

A continuación te pido que me indiques, si es que hay, una manera de poder traducer lo que me escribís... gracias.

@Cristian cda: Hi,

Sorry, I don't speak Spanish. You may find help in Spanish in the Commons:Café. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:30, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

La imagen joaquinperezprados0.jpg es titularidad de Majarova

Cuando subí la imagen Joaquinperezprados0.jpg aseguré que era mía. Ustedes aseguran que está tomada de la web http://www.joaquinperezprados.es y es cierto que es la misma imagen porque el autor de dicha página (http://www.joaquinperezprados.es) es también Majarova. Si ustedes miran el código fuente de dicha web verán: <meta name="author" content="Majarova"> <meta name="copyright" content="Majarova"> Espero que con esto quede claro que no ha habido ninguna mala praxis, en todo caso puede que por mi falta de experiencia en no haya expresado bien. Les ruego repongan la imagen borrada. --Majarova (talk) 08:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll answer in English then: When I uploaded the picture Joaquinperezprados0.jpg, I already stated it was mine. You claim it was taken from the web http://www.joaquinperezprados.es, which is true. However, I (Majarova) happen to be the author of that web as well. If you check the source code, you should read: <meta name="author" content="Majarova"> <meta name="copyright" content="Majarova">. I hope this to be proof enough that there wasn’t any bad praxis. Now I kindly beg you put the picture back. --Majarova (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Majarova: Hi,

If the website is yours, could you add a mention of a free license there? That would fix it. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann,

I updated the website following your indications.--Majarova (talk) 21:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Majarova: OK, I restored the file, and reviewed the license. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Christiane Lambert et Nicole Guedj

Bonjour Yann, je refais appel à ton expertise pour savoir si la photo en lien Flickr est éligible dans Wikimedia Commons en l'état. Merci d'avance. Cordialement--Amage9 (talk) 11:25, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amage9 : Non, cette licence n'est pas acceptée sur Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Yann, rapidité, efficacité ! --Amage9 (talk) 11:52, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of the Cayman Islands

Hello: Would it be possible to restore the original File:Coat of arms of the Cayman Islands.svg, as you did with the flag? Thank you and best regards, Echando una mano (talk) 01:46, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 10:07, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of the File

Yann

I had the permission by email on a day of upload, but till that very moment no one responded to it. File https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Superhero_Landing_Season_1.png Ticket:2018062310003598

How is this usually handled? It's been almost two weeks since I mailed my permission. Do I have to wait or upload it again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasily Levanov (talk • contribs) 18:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vasily Levanov: Hi,

First there is always a hug backlog, so it will take some time.

Second, at first glance, the permission is not valid. It is not you who must send the permission, but the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:19, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann,

I am the copyright holder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasily Levanov (talk • contribs) 18:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vasily Levanov: Hi,

First, you don't need to ping me on my own talk page.

Second, I don't think your claim will be accepted by anyone without proof. This is a small thumbnail of a poster, you will need much better convincing arguments: when was this made, for which purpose, when was it published, etc. And OTRS will certainly ask you to provide a high resolution copy. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valamis-logo-black-rgb.svg

Hi Yann. I'm wondering if you'd mind taking a look at this file. I'd tagged it with {{Speedy delete}}, but the files licensing was converted to {{PD-textlogo}} by the uploader. The uploader also posted on at en:User talk:Marchjuly#File:Valamis-logo-black-rgb.svg and seems to be claiming that they are a representative or employee of the Valamis Group. I of course have no way of verifying this, but they could be associated with the company with the company in some way either as an employee or as someone contracted by the company to create a Wikipedia article. Anyway, if the logo is really PD, then none of that matters; however, there isn't really anything mentioned about logos in COM:TOO#Finland so it's hard to tell if this would be below the Finland's TOO. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marchjuly,

Yes, for me, this is {{PD-textlogo}}. Regard, Yann (talk) 10:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look at this Yann. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

removal request

Hi. I accidentally exposed some of my personal info (the gps location actually) . so please remove all my uploaded pictures after June 1st 2018 until July 3rd 2018 and remove the history if it is needed: link. If possible give me a well-formatted file of the description so I can upload them later. Many Thanks , Leyth (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leyth,

You don't need to delete the file to remove the GPD data. Just edit the page, like this. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:30, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to see the metadata section. There are tons of data about me. Also everyone can see the location in the history. Leyth (talk) 07:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Le Dernier Kodachrome ver1.jpg

Hello, Yann,

Thank you for your message. The authorization will be sent today.

Best regards, --Joiesoudaine (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joiesoudaine (talk • contribs) 06:48, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Joiesoudaine: Il existe déjà une autre version, donc c'est bon : File:Le Dernier Kodachrome ver1.jpg. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coda

Yann, merci pour la vérification de licence de Twombly. Si tu cherches la chaîne de caractères "Licensed under CC-BY by the Coda Museum", il y en a d'autres du même intérêt qui risquent de changer de licence... Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 21:22, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Il faudrait demander une {{Licensereview}} pour tous ces fichiers. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 21:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Racconish ^💬 09:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linux Lite Simple Fast Free logo.png

Hello, please delete template {{No permission since}} from this file. I am thought the license on this file is incorrect, and I am informed author. Author said he is creator of Linux Lite. Marshmallych 09:54, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Marshmally: The author should send a permission via COM:OTRS, or show a free license online. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:12, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Les Gobelins metro station.jpg

I do not understand the problem, as this file was uploaded from Flickr, and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the license indicated on the date of upload. Can you be more specific? Thanks. Croquant (talk) 13:57, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Croquant,

Je pense que l'affiche est un peu trop proéminente, mais on pourrait la réduire. Quand penses-tu ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:19, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finalement, je l'ai réduit, ça résout le problème. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why you nominate deletion of "ꯁꯥꯖꯤꯛ"

Is it because of writing in Meetei Mayek or Copyright issue .

This photo/picture is my own work Why it is selected for deletion. Awangba Mangang (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hello Awangba Mangang, the image file is faulty. Half of it just shows a an empty area (see here). Please try to upload a new version. If that does not fix the issue, your original file really seems to be broken. De728631 (talk) 20:14, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it the photos that I uploaded in Facebook can't be used in Wikipedia?

But author or owner is only one . Awangba Mangang (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awangba Mangang: Do not upload files from Facebook. You have the choice to send a permission via COM:OTRS, but it is a long and complicated process, or to upload the original image from your camera. That's the same process for every document which was previously published elsewhere. And some of the files you have uploaded are obviously not your own works. You are not allowed to upload them without a formal written permission from the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other versions

File:JPL Visions of the Future, TRAPPIST-1e.jpg

Is this too much for "other versions"? Normally one would use the category for this, but the overview in the category is not so good anymore with all the incorrectly rendered TIFF files. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would put there only the other versions of the same poster. That's what other versions means. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:40, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you rename File:JPL Visions of the Future, HD 40307 g.jpg and File:JPL Visions of the Future, HD 40307 g.tif to change "HD 40307 g" to "HD 40307g"? The space should not be there (also according to the source) and I have to adjust this every time I copypaste something. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima, positive.jpg

I don't think this image is eligible for PD-US-GOV. While Joe Rosenthal did serve briefly in the US Maritime Service as a photographer, at the time this image was taken, he was working for the Associated Press. He died in 2006, meaning it won't be PD until 2076. GMG ^talk 18:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GreenMeansGo: Hi,

This is not the original image. Please read my message on Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:04, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima, positive.jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 20:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter - Summer 2018

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates

Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd ^webchat
Since our last newsletter, the Structured Data team has moved into designing and building prototypes for various features. The use of multilingual captions in the UploadWizard and on the file page has been researched, designed, discussed, and built out for use. Behind the scenes, back-end work on search is taking place and designs are being drawn up for the front-end. There will soon be specifications published for the use of the first Wikidata property on Commons, "Depicts," and a prototype is to be released to go along with that.

Things to do / input and feedback requests

A workshop on what Wikidata properties Commons will need. This workshop will be open for the entire month of July 2018 at minimum.

Join the community focus group!
Do you want to help out translating messages about Structured Data on Commons from English to your own language? Sign up on the translators page.
Contribute to the next newsletter.

Discussions held

In late February there was a discussion around how Commons generally sees data being modeled.

The first discussion on copyright and licensing with Commons was held in March. This was a "high level" discussion, there will be a consultation later this summer about the deeper mapping of copyright and licensing in a structured way.
In April there was an exercise for GLAM partners in metadata and ontology mapping.
A discussion about the design for Multilingual Captions on the file page took place in May. You can still review the designs and leave feedback.
There was an IRC office hour in June to discuss progress so far and future plans.

Wikimania 2018

Three sessions about Structured Commons are officially scheduled for Wikimania 2018 - Cape Town, South Africa - July 2018.
- Wikimedia Commons and GLAM needs around the world (Friday 20 July, 10:30 local time)
- Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons and knowledge equity (Friday 20 July, 14:00 local time)
- Design challenge workshop: How can multilingual structured metadata bring knowledge equity to Commons? (Friday 20 July, 14:30 local time)
Structured Data on Commons is also a focus area during the Wikimania 2018 Hackathon. We will, among other things, do 'live' modelling of Wikidata properties for Commons - an offline spin-off of the community consultation taking place on wiki.

Partners and allies

We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group (phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
Structured Data on Commons was presented to GLAM audiences during EuropeanaTech 2018 in Rotterdam (15 May 2018) and at the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek Forum in Berlin (4 June 2018).

Research

Two research projects about Wikimedia Commons are currently ongoing, or in the process of being finished:

Research:Curation workflows on Wikimedia Commons—a project that seeks to understand the current workflows of Commons contributors who curate media (categorize it, delete it, link to it from other projects, etc.).
Research:Technical needs of external re-users of Commons media—soliciting feedback from individuals and organizations that re-use Commons content outside of Wikimedia projects, in order to understand their current painpoints and unmet needs.

Development

Prototypes will be available for Depicts soon.

Stay up to date!

Follow the Structured Data on Commons project on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/34/
Subscribe to this newsletter to receive it on a talk page of your own choice.
Join the next IRC office hour and ask questions to the team! The date for next quarter will be announced soon.

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 21:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data Newsletter - Research link fix

Greetings,

The newsletter omitted two interwiki prefixes, breaking the links on non-meta wikis as you might see above. Here are the correct links:

m:Research:Curation workflows on Wikimedia Commons—a project that seeks to understand the current workflows of Commons contributors who curate media (categorize it, delete it, link to it from other projects, etc.).
m:Research:Technical needs of external re-users of Commons media—soliciting feedback from individuals and organizations that re-use Commons content outside of Wikimedia projects, in order to understand their current painpoints and unmet needs.

My apologies, I hope you find the corrected links helpful.

- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Regarding this [9], I didn't know it was possible to indef someone for a set amount of time. As it is, the block you have for him is set to expire on the 14th. Can I ask why? Personally, I think it's best he's not truly indeffed because right now he's hot under the collar and acting on emotion. Maybe with some time off a cooler head will prevail. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 01:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, please review and revert the block against Rowan Forest (not socking, but canvasing per request at w:Special:Diff/849420432). Separately from that, please consider reducing the number of block flags against Renamed user g5r8c5h8j5g2f55v5h2h5g5d2s2c5b5—perhaps back to what is was previously. —Sladen (talk) 01:46, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, your behavior in your capacity as an admin is being discussed at User_talk:Rowan Forest. An explanation on your part is requested as to why you deleted this page [10]. Please answer at User_talk Rowan Forest. EEng (talk) 02:31, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a discussion about this open at COM:AN. Guanaco (talk) 02:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

You've always been one of our most knowledgeable users, and this project is much better because you've been here. Thank you for everything you've done here, and I hope you have a good trip. Guanaco (talk) 05:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

dont delete because it is my picture

hi User:Yann, thanks for concern but you delee my picture that it is not get on google, yutaka ozaki picture is the screenshot from the video in I love you song. sorry but please, dont delete it because i didnt do any violation for uploadin files. thanksShiminUfesoj (talk)

i didnt violate copyright or plagiarism. ShiminUfesoj (talk) 10:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

let it back, dont delete, its mine ShiminUfesoj (talk) 10:43, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and this one also, , it is mine, did you watch it, there is a name in the last part ShiminUfesoj thanks, by the way the picture above ROS or rules of survival is mine, characters are mine. thanks ShiminUfesoj (talk) 10:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @ShiminUfesoj: Please read Commons:Screenshots. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 10:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks you for info - Alexis Jazz ShiminUfesoj (talk) 07:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ShiminUfesoj: Hi,

Which sources did you use to create these maps? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, those maps Are drawn in Ms paint and art application in cellphone, it doesn't mean that I copied it to the computer and edit then edit... I draw it with hard work and time, because I know that if I uploaded pictures from the computer, I violating copy right license, so please don't delete those maps.

About the ROS picture, I get permission to the owner of the screenshot, visit fb account Joseph Villanueva Ciudadano and you can saw his cover photo. Thanks you, do your best for wiki.

so please dont delete does picture, because it all of my work, you did not find it in google or any website except on my cellphone only so please regarad ShiminUfesoj (talk) 07:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ShiminUfesoj: Please ask Joseph Villanueva Ciudadano to send a permission via COM:OTRS for the screenshot. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i cant understand the COM:OTRS, but trully, those maps are mine, please retriveg it because thats is the only picture or maps are written in my language, BICOL languages and it is important to the article. thanks retrieve it :) - ShiminUfesoj (talk) 10:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

even the file is mine, well in the last video, you can saw japanese text which it can translate to my name. ShiminUfesoj (talk) 10:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hi: please retrived those photos, it is big help to the BCL wiki, please retrived it. thanks Yutaka Ozaki Sempai (talk) 10:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Yann/archives 41

Marie-Renée Ucciani : peintre et sculpteur

Review needed

Translation notification: Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n

Why did you delete the image of Hyrule?

User: Boom Jayson

Hi, Yann !

Flickr user Seeminglee DR

Finish deleteting

Photographie « Laurent Cunasc »

File:Lokalov Aleksey Vasilievich.jpg.

Hi I have not violated Copyright.

photos

Copyright infringement

Licences

Category:Images from Gallica with broken source

Micehlotti Pura

Files with broken source

Thank you and...

Block Warning

Copyright

re:Copyright status: File:Watchlist icon.png

Copyright Problem

Kapoly church

re:Tagging copyvios

Jack Stupp

Copyright violations

File:Tilesweeper cover.jpg

Media Files

Sock identification

deleted image

Uploading new versions for license reviewed files

Sock (vandal) upload

Structured Data on Commons IRC Office Hour, Tuesday 26 June

Copyright violations warning

apa masalah engkau deknon

ReːFiles without a page

Erreur

Re:Tagging copyvios

What properties does Commons need?

Rollback

J'aimerai avoir un conseil

In spanish please!!

La imagen joaquinperezprados0.jpg es titularidad de Majarova

Photo Christiane Lambert et Nicole Guedj

Coat of arms of the Cayman Islands

Deletion of the File

removal request

File tagging File:Le Dernier Kodachrome ver1.jpg

Coda

File tagging File:Les Gobelins metro station.jpg

Why you nominate deletion of "ꯁꯥꯖꯤꯛ"

Is it the photos that I uploaded in Facebook can't be used in Wikipedia?

Other versions

Notification about possible deletion

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter - Summer 2018

Structured Data Newsletter - Research link fix

Question

Some bubble tea for you!

dont delete because it is my picture

Navigation menu

Search