User talk:Yann/archives 37

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Deletion request of my images

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Fish_fry_shop_in_Poompuhar_JEG6166.jpg Hi Thanks for this. There is one more similar image see here: File:Fish_fry_shop_in_Poompuhar_JEG6164.jpg Does this falls under the same category? If so do nominate for deletion or should I send a deletion request? --Jegan 14:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Here one could argue that the stand is the main subject. However it would be better to blurr the banner. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:52, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please verify license claims on this user uploads, if you could read Marathi? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are several other uploaders who upload old books on Marathi (see User:OgreBot/Notable uploads/2017 June 13), so please take look there too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I reviewed uploads by this account, added the authors' name in Latin script, and nominated 3 files for deletion. I will look at the other files later. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Couple of more similar uploaders: दामिनी दौंडकर (talk · contribs), राणी थिटे (talk · contribs). I think will be good idea to find out is it project in Wikisource (so copyrights rules should be explained there) or checkuser involvement is needed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I added a warning for now. I will check the details later. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please also take a look on कांबळे प्रमिला (talk · contribs). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting of file Алексей Каменский, начало 1930-х

Hi, Yann! You`ve deleted 2 files uploaded by me to Wikipedia for using them in the article https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9,_%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 I think one of them is (was) this - https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9,_1930-%D0%B5_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%8B.jpg

These photos are old, yes, but I own their originals, they are conserved in my family, they are photos of my father in youth and other my parents. They belong to me as the successor of my parents, I would like to publish them on Wiki pages. So please don`t delete them. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamenssky (talk • contribs) 16:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kamenssky: Hi,
As for any work previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tpraytor deleted pics

Yann You have categorized my pics as copyright violations when you do not have any idea what you are talking about. All of our pics we have uploaded are our and we have thousands over 20 years of covering auto racing. Please stay away from our pics because you obviously don't know who I am or anything about the pics I've uploaded. I suggest you ask questions in the future before deleting pics. I simple goggle search would have shown my association with motorsports. Tommy Praytor Tpraytor (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tpraytor,
First I advise you to get a low profile. It is quite obvious that you are not the author of the files you uploaded. In such case, the copyright owner need to send a formal written permission for a free license. Please see the instructions on COM:OTRS. Do not upload any more files without a permission or you will get blocked. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:15, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what low profile is but I do know someone who does not have a clue what they are talking about and its you! Now you have mad e a bold face accusation about my pictures and you either need to take that back and undelete my pics. tpraytorTpraytor (talk) 03:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading photos to Farshid Moussavi's wikipedia

Good afternoon,

As the studio manager of FMA, I am asked by Farshid Moussavi herself to regularly update the photo selection on her page. I did not realise this was not allowed as I am fairly new to the company but i was under the impression that the previous manager used to do so also but without any issues.

Please let me know if there is a way this can be rectified. I always get permission the photographer and email the permission letters to the relevant people.

Thank you in advance,

Jennifer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmaoffice (talk • contribs) 14:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fmaoffice: Hi,
The permission is needed if the uploader is not the personal owner of the copyright, which is your case. Please see the instructions on COM:OTRS. The files can be restored when the permission is validated. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Response to concern about copyright

Hi Yann,

Did I miss something? Your note says that I have submitted copyrighted images, which doesn't seem relevant. We own the rights to all of the photos we've uploaded and added them to the wiki with full knowledge that this makes them available under creative commons. We certainly don't want to be in violation of the wiki rules; my understanding was that we could authorize the photos we own. I will go through and edit them to note that. However, they are, in fact, free for me to publish, yes? If you have any questions, or if I need to do something more specific to individual photos, please let me know.

Thank you, Eli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonillae (talk • contribs) 15:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonillae: Hi,
The permission is confirmed, so your files are OK. I removed the warning. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photographies de copies

Bonjour Yann, dois-je faire une demande OTRS pour une statue, copie d'oeuvre du XIIIe siècle réalisée par un artiste vivant pour un chantier commandité par l'Etat français ? Bien cordialement Garitan (talk) 21:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Garitan,
Dans le doute, cela me semble une bonne idée. Il est assez difficile de savoir si l'auteur d'une copie a des droits ou pas. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
C'est assez embêtant, les rénovations actuelles faites sur les cathédrales mettent en jeu des réfections données à des sculpteurs. Par exemple, toutes photographie de la cathédrale de Reims devrait être censurée à ce titre. De nombreuses statues ont été refaites, vers 1930, puis vers 1986 et la façade actuelle, plusieurs statues sont de Leandro Berra, artiste vivant. De plus la France n'a pas progressé sur le droit de panorama. Bref, c'est le nœud gordien ? Cordialement Garitan (talk) 14:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, c'est très embêtant. Pour être certain qu'il n'y ait pas de droits sur les copies, il faudrait pouvoir comparer avec les originaux. Et dans ce cas, on n'a plus besoin d'avoir une photo des copies. Vous pouvez aussi importer les photos, et demander sur COM:VPC l'avis de contributeurs. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Status de direitos autorais: File:Castêlo da Maia rua.jpg

Não compreendo a questão. A imagem já está (e sempre esteve) classificada como Permissão {{PD-self}}. Porque quer apagá-la? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hipersyl (talk • contribs)

@Hipersyl: Hi,
OK, fine. Yann (talk) 09:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

פונטיין

זה לא נכון מה שכתבת לי. לא העליתי שוב מדיה שנמחקה אחרי שנכתב לי שאסור לעשות זאת על כן הגשתי בקשה לגבי כל אחת מהתמונות ל Commons:Undeletion requests והגשתי במקביל בקשת {{OTRS pending}} לתמיכה של OTRS עם כל המסמכים הנדרשים. מבקשת לא לאיים ולא לשלוח הודעות מסוג זה שמהוות הטרדה. תודה --פונטיין (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, all פונטיין's uploads handled in ticket:2017060610011112, so please be patient.-- Geagea (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fmaoffice

Hi, all have permissions have been sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Will the photos be restored? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmaoffice (talk • contribs) 12:40, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fmaoffice: Hi,
Do you have the ticket number? When the permission is validated, yes. As there is an important backlog, it can take some time. Please be patient. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rights

Hi Yann, Sorry I just saw your email today. I sent you an email that was not according to the template, I saw the Instructions afterwards. I will send you a full email with the required info, plase do not deleate the info.In a few hours you will get all the info. Best regards, Tamara Toma de Perez President of Foundation Perez Celis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fundacionperezcelis (talk • contribs) 13:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fundacionperezcelis: Hi,
The mail has to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, not to me. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teréz anya

jó fotó --Dencey (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Did you read [1]? I don't see any reason to doubt this research. It is precise and detailed. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ok :(--Dencey (talk) 16:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you take a look at this file's license? The word is "signalée" and I'm unsure whether it's an attribution requirement or an unacceptable notification demand. Guanaco (talk) 17:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guanaco,
This file comes from a reputed contributor, but who is now not active. I would not doubt his intention to release his picture under a free license.
This dates back when there was no freedom of panorama in Belgium. This may explain that. See Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Atomium by night Luc viatour.JPG, and it was restored in December 2016. Did you try to ask the uploader? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying. I've sent the uploader an email, and I'll give him some time to reply. Guanaco (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:АНКОР.png

Dear Yann! I tagged my file АНКОР.png as "speedy delete", because it was a mistake to put it to Wikimedia Commons. It's a logo of Russian holding ANCOR and it is not freely licensed. Best regards, Nmancor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nmaancor (talk • contribs) 09:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done OK, deleted. Since I don't understand what you wrote, I thought it better to have a proper DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate

I don't think you can take a side in a deletion request and close the request (on your side). Could you ellaborate? --Discasto talk 20:55, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, If that were the case, nobody could close a DR. It is quite often that I give an opinion in a DR and I close it. Nothing unusual. More over, and that's the most important, there is no reason to delete them. I thought we could have a constructive discussion, and that's why I nominated my own files for deletion. But it seems I was wrong. We have had an interesting discussion, which demonstrated that there is no reason to delete them. But then Jcb deleted the files without understanding what this was about. I am very deceived by people taking foolish arbitrary decision without any regards for the community, and the work of others. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, Bluefarrow here. I'm a little confused by the No Permission tag on this file. The original source clearly states that the image is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 by the author. Is cc-by-sa-3.0 not enough to satisfy wikimedia policy? Please note that a previous deletion request concluded that there was no valid reason for deletion. Bluefarrow (talk) 04:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bluefarrow,
OK, I removed the warning. I thought this was a derivative work without a proper source and permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, buddy. Bluefarrow (talk) 01:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images you deleted in June 2017

Hi Yann. I believe you deleted the images above. I emailed the declaration of consent form I received from the copyright owner. Did OTRS confirm these images? Were there problems with the confirmation process? I need to know why these images were deleted. Thanks. Versace1608 (talk) 10:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Versace1608,
Do you have the ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Votre suppression de l'image "Saïgon, 2011"

Bonjour Yann, Vous avez supprimé dans la matinée l'image "Saïgon, 2011". Je vous informe que c'est l'artiste, Cyril Phan (Kongo) lui-même qui l'a téléchargée sur Wikipedia Commons, et que par ailleurs, il vient d'adresser à "permissions-commons" le formulaire par lequel il atteste qu'il est détenteur des droits sur cette image, ainsi que sur un portrait le représentant. Je souhaite donc que vous remettiez cette image dans Commons. Merci d'avance. --Félicie (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Félicie,
Avez-vous l'adresse de l'image et le numéro du ticket ? Sinon l'image sera restaurée lorsque l'autorisation sera validée. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci de votre réponse si rapide, Yann. L'adresse de l'image était File:Saigon, 2011, acrylique et aérosol sur toile, 200x200.tif. Et je ne sais pas ce qu'est un numéro de ticket. Si ce n'est pas possible autrement, nous attendrons la validation de l'autorisation pour que l'image soit restaurée, ce n'est pas grave. Pour le moment, Cyril Phan a juste eu un message automatique accusant réception de son courriel. Cordialement. --Félicie (talk) 12:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Félicie: OK, j'ai restauré ce fichier, mais l'autorisation pour le portrait est insuffisante, car les droits appartiennent habituellement au photographe. Pour info, le numéro du ticket se trouve dans l'objet du mail automatique de réponse. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! as far as I know Chambal is large area. Any idea where this image was clicked? At least rough location, or nearby popular city/town? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:00, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmadhyaksha: Sure! Done. Thanks for taking interest in my pictures. ;) Yann (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Liri8780

hello yan

i have just now uploaded a image of my father

the photo has been taken from my family and i have the full writes for it

please update me asap if there is a probalm

liri

this is the page - https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%97%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D_%D7%9B%D7%94%D7%9F_(%D7%9B%D7%93%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%92%D7%9C%D7%9F) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liri8780 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Liri8780: Hi,
Please request undeletion on COM:UDR with full details: date of publication, author/photographer, source, etc. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

442anddeletion

Yann. Thank you for your help..I'm simply a novice,excuse my lack of protocol Timmy328 Timmy318 (talk) 11:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

copyright for photos

Hi, you say that I have been violating copyright rules by uploading new photos. But that is totally wrong. I have the explicit support from the photographer (Peter Knutson) to deliver and upload this portrait photos to Wikimedia Commons for this purpose. I don't understand why you choose to threaten to suspend my account. Please alter your tone...

Best regards, Staffan Dopping — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stadop (talk • contribs) 20:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Stadop: Hi,
You need a formal written permission from the photographer to upload images which are not your own works. And any file without proper permission is deleted as copyright violation unless proven otherwise. That's the standard procedure on Commons. If the photographer gives a permission, he has to send it following instructions on COM:OTRS, then the files can be restored once the permission is validated. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging copyvios Marcinklos2003 (talk · contribs)

Hello. The uploader was informed yesterday on his Polish user talk page. Most of his uploads are copyright violations. In spite of having been warned several times, he keeps on uploading non-free files. I gave him the final warning. Regards. Cynko (talk) 06:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks, Yann (talk) 10:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For Warning

Hi Yann, Thanks for the warning, I think I made a mistake, I just get their Photos through email and upload without checking their property. you can delete those pictures, I will try to get their picture by myself later. regards - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Liri8780 - ANSWER FOR FULL WRITES OF HAIM COHEN PICTURE

HEY YAN

I GOT YOUR MSG

THE PICTURE HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM THE FAMILY ALBUM

IS TAKEN BY MY FATHER IN THE YEAR 1965

PLACE OF THE PHOTO - BEER SHEVA , ISRAEL

AUTHOR , HAIM COHEN

PLEASE UPDATE ME ASAP

THE REQUSET HAS REGARDS TO THIS PAGE - https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%97%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D_%D7%9B%D7%94%D7%9F_(%D7%9B%D7%93%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%92%D7%9C%D7%9F) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liri8780 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Liri8780: Hi,
Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards,Yann (talk) 18:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DVargasCRI: you sent me a warning message on uploadin copywrited materials

please specify which material are you referring to. I receiv d a notification on the imag JuanCarlosRojas that I sent the proper documentation that I read was required to publish, yet I still get this warning that my account will be suspended.

Why am I receiving this message? Did you not get my document after I followed the stated procedure? Do you want me to delete the file and then upload it again?

Your message was very vague in terms of what can I do to correct the problem. Or is there nothing to do and I should just sit with my arms coprossed waitinfpg for the notice that my account is suspended.

Please explain in detail what can I do, if anything, to change this situation. I was under the impression that I was doing everything by the book. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.32.29.198 (talk) 18:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in and sign your post, so that we can know which files you are talking about. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Вільям: You told me that uploaded images without copyright

Good day. The picture I added last times contained a portrait of Vasily Stus, which seemed to require permission. I had an interview with someone who has access to this mailbox permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. If I upload this same file, but without the image of Vasily Stus everything will be ok? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.143.42.10 (talk) 07:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in and sign your post, so that we can know which files you are talking about. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm about the file that is located under this link File:«The_University_news».jpg. Unfortunately, he was removed. Вільям (talk)
Hi Вільям,
As this was published before, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. The file will be restored will the permission is validated, which can take some time, as there is always a backlog. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation warning

I am logged in now.

I received a warning from you that I have uploaded copyrighted material. The image has been deleted. I received a warning several days prior to this new one stating that I should provide proof that the image I uploaded has the release from its author which I sent by email on July 12th. Now I thought I followed the correct procedure emailing this document to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. But then I received your message stating that I have uploaded several files that are copyright violations.

I am unclear why this has happened. I do not wish for my account to be blocked if I followed (or so I thought) the instructions stated in the page. Please explain to me what exactly I am doing wrong?

Since instructions on this page are not clear to me, I wish to know how can I correct this.

I enclose the text from the document I sent by email to the address above

DVargasCRI 10 julio 2017 Por la presente declaro que soy el titular de los derechos de autor exclusivos de File:Juan Carlos Rojas.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Juan_Carlos_Rojas.jpg . Consiento que dicha obra se publique bajo la licencia libre CC-BY-SA 3.0 (Reconocimiento-Compartir Igual) [O CUALQUIERA DE LAS LICENCIAS DE AQUÍ]. Reconozco que concedo a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades. Soy consciente de que siempre retendré los derechos de autor de mi imagen, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para mi obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no me serán atribuidas. Soy consciente de que la licencia libre solo afecta a los derechos de autor, y me reservo del derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas. Reconozco que no puedo retractarme de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia. Luis Alvarado Alvarado. (Signature) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DvargasCRI (talk • contribs) 15:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DvargasCRI: Hi,
Thanks for the permission. The file will be restored when the permission is validated, which can take some time, as there is always a backlog. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS check please

Yann, I'm not an OTRS member currently, but can you check this image please -- File:Raju parulekar.jpg? There's an OTRS ticket that was added with the upload, not by an OTRS member, and I just deleted some text copyvio from the user on en.wiki. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All other remaining uploads also have to be checked as they suffer from the same problems. Some 30 other uploads have been deleted. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, Just checking again as you may have missed this, or would you like me to check elsewhere? cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 04:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Yann (talk) 09:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I provided valid proof of the permission I got from Davood Hassani, the copyright holder of the image. Why was it still removed? I sent an email with him saying it was okay to use on wikipedia, as long as I mentioned his name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Democracy (talk • contribs) 22:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr Democracy: Hi,
The file will be restored when the permission is validated. As there is an important backlog, it can take some time. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: How long time does it usually take? It has been months since it was removed, and I sent the email with proof of the permission I got. Where can I see the pending list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Democracy (talk • contribs) 16:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr Democracy: Hi, Do you have the ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Here is the Ticket:2017022510015581. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Democracy (talk • contribs) 18:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr Democracy: There is no permission in this ticket. This file is from Flickr, where it is under "All rights reserved". It was answered on 16-04-2017 to provide a permission, or better, to change the license at the source. Please note that "okay to use on wikipedia" is not sufficient. We need a permission for free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: What do you mean by "There is no permission"? I uploaded screenshots of the emails I exchanged with the copyright holder. If they are not present, where would I go to re-upload the screenshots? Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Democracy (talk • contribs) 13:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Slovenskej sporiteľne

Hello you added the PD-textlogo template on copyrighted logo File:Logo Slovenskej sporiteľne.png. It's a copyrighted typeface Erste Group and has a logo (not text) on the right side, so please delete the file. Thanks. —Kandy Talbot 12:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
This is clearly {{PD-textlogo}}. There is no reason to delete it, let alone speedy delete it. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nice! So almost all latest logos are PD-textlogo and all rendered copyrighted fonts are public domain. Good to know. :) —Kandy Talbot 13:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protéger les fichiers importants

Cher Yann !
C'est tout naturellement que je me suis tournée vers Magog the Ogre pour demander de supprimer l'ancienne version du fichier en raison des renseignements personnels. Ainsi, il va supprimer tous les quatre mes fichier. Lisez, s'il vous plaît, ici :

Je vous serais très reconnaissant si vous pouviez m'aider à protéger ces documents importants.--V2016 (talk) 15:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour V2016,
L'acte de naissance peut être héberger sur Commons, mais pour les autres fichiers, Magog a raison. Ils sont hors sujet ici, sans parler que l'auteur des lettres détient les droits d'auteur. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Postpone notice of deletion Files Author Lorenru

Hello Yann

You left a message about two files that are copyright violations, these pictures were taken with my ipad and I have them. I would really appreciate if you can postpone your notice of deletion until I find how to submite the rights on wikimedia commons. I cannot do it straight now because I am at work thus I will do it when I come back to home. I also would appreciate if you could please provide me the instructions to justify these pictures were taken with my ipad. Best Lorenru Lorenru (talk) 20:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lorenru,
You have one week to upload the original files, or send a permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Yann,
Could you please provide me the link where I can find the instructions to upload the original file? I tried to edit the file uploading the original but it semes that I have to delet it and create a new one, is it correct? Lorenru
Hi Lorenru,
You don't need to ping me on my own talk page. No, you do not need to delete the files. Please go at the bottom of each file page, there is a link "Upload a new version of this file". Regards, Yann (talk) 22:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation warning - File:Japinha-qualeadele.jpg

Hi there, the image File:Japinha-qualeadele.jpg was removed from Ricardo Di Roberto Wikipedia webpage, but it was properly sent to permissions-commons@wikipedia.org by the copywriter on July 11th,2017. Can you explain the reeason it was removed, please? Best regards.--Edi Veloso (talk) 11:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--Edi Veloso (talk) 11:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edi Veloso,
This was published before, so a formal written permission is needed. Do you have the ticket number? BTW there is no need to copy the permission here. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yann. Yes, I have the original Ticket:2017061310006776. I had sent many additional notifications to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the copywriter permission, but no answers till now. I appreciate if you or any additional volunteer can update the usage authorization of this image based on the permission the copywriter sent. Thank you in advance. --Edi Veloso (talk) 15:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edi Veloso,
No permission was received for this file. According to the information provided in the file description, the photographer is Priscila Prade, so the permission has to come from her. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My photos

Hi Yann! Some of the photos you requested to delete I own their rights and my personal portrayal. Dahomvic (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dahomvic,
Most of your uploads are not your own works, so you need a formal written permission from the copyright owner (i.e. the photographer) to publish them here. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:07, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For example File:الشيخ فهد بن ظويهر.jpg, this photo from my blog for someone famous from my family. The picture I got from the family album. Its own work.Dahomvic (talk) 21:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dahomvic, the copyright belongs to the photographer, not to you. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, But the photographer died a long time ago! And he from the family. This applies to this document I copied it myself File:وثيقة فهد بن ظويهر.jpg.Dahomvic (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dahomvic, You don't need to ping me on my own talk page. Yes, copyright can last for a very long time. Please request undeletion on COM:UDR with the following information: name of the photographer with your relation to him/her, date of publication, etc. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mantua Postcard

hi, I wrote to you because I noticed that the restored mantova postcards files, in addition to being restored, you also added an additional license, including photographs, if you are the administrator who had restored the following files then , I would kindly thank you ,,,,,,, And given that you are an administrator, I would like to take advantage of these files uploaded by this user that has been locked in the past. If you can see which files (postcards, oval thumbnails, portraits and photographs, etc.) you can try to restore

Special:DeletedContributions/Глинистый сланец --82.52.36.145 14:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Please make a request on COM:UDR with as much details as possible. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cookies1001

Well.. im new in this stuff ,sorry if I upload photos with copyright or stuff like that , So it is ok, from now on I will use images that have uploaded other users and if I want to upload an image, I do not know if it would be well to consult with you on your discussion page.

Thanks --Cookies1001 (talk) 01:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cookies1001,
Our policy is quite simple: only upload images created by yourself, with your own camera. For any other content, you need a formal written permission from the copyright owner, i.e. the author (if you have a permission, see COM:OTRS). You can ask me here anything any time. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I will ,Thank you so much :) Cookies1001 (talk) 20:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FourLoko

Hi Yann,

I see the edits and images I included for the Four Loko page were taken down due to copyright violation concerns. How can I get these images approved? This is my first time making edits so please excuse my ignorance — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1008:B05F:9679:F063:31A2:8AA8:CE63 (talk) 20:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
These files are derivative works, so a permission from the designer/producer is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests without due research

Please Yann, your 3 deletion requests here, here and here are done without due research. The European Parliament has the rights and gives them free to use. At "Permission=" I even gave the link where the EP states this. Ymnes (talk) 17:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ymnes,
It seems not, the permission is only for fair use. Nevertheless, do not remove a warning, or you might be blocked. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests for my files

Fixed all your issues, b. Evaluate.

WolvesS (talk) 17:44, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, can you make the following changes to the page Campaign: tos-rs?

{
    "enabled": true,
    "title": "Trace of Soul",
    "display": {
        "headerLabel": "{{Trace of Soul is running|sr|{{Upload campaign header tos-rs}}|before={{Upload campaign header Trace of Soul before}}|after={{Upload campaign header Trace of Soul finished}}}}",
        "thanksLabel": "{{Upload campaign use Trace of Soul}}"
    },
    "autoAdd": {
        "wikitext": "{{Trace of Soul 2017}} \n [[Category:Images from Trace of Soul 2017 in Republic of Srpska]]"
    },
    "licensing": {
        "ownWorkDefault": "own",
        "ownWork": {
            "licenses": [
                "cc-by-sa-4.0"
            ]
        }
    },
    "tutorial": {
        "skip": true
    }
}

--Ранко Николић (talk) 20:40, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, it's me again. When a campaign starts up, there is a problem, and I do not know how to fix it. Can you help me?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UploadWizard&campaign=tos-rs --Ранко Николић (talk) 21:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann, Cette photo était indiquée comme VOA à mon souvenir. Mais, je m'aperçois qu'il s'agit d'une photo AP. [2]. Peut-être l'indication AP manquait-elle initialement ? Je fais attention à cela habituellement. Désolé. Merci en tout cas de l'indication sur ma pdd. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 12:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads copyright violations

Hi Yann, I am sorry about the photo copyrights issues. I probably need to read more about the process. Could you direct me to a specific resource that I can read about images that are provided by high profile people for the press? For example for Ashish Thakkar, I went to his company's website and got an image that is provided media use. As for Teacher Mpamire, I saw on his website that picture is free to use for all (http://teachermpamire.co.ug)

Best, Innocent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innocentwalu (talk • contribs) 14:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Innocentwalu: Hi,
This website is only a blank page right now. On Wikimedia Commons, only content with a free license is allowed. So "photos for the press and media" are not free. We need images for any use, including commercial ones. If you have a permission from the copyright owner, please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Please read COM:L about the accepted free licenses. Feel free to ask if you have more questions. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changing {{Nd}} to {{O}}

You do know I'm an admin and qualified to make that decision? Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:18, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rodhullandemu,
{{Nd}} is used when closing the requests, but you didn't close them. Beside, it is best to wait for 24h before closing them. And could you please add {{User admin}} on your user page? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's there, and has been since I became an admin. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Svet Tambure Picture Removal

Hi, im contacting you about this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svet_Tambure the picture was removed, and i hold the copyright, so how do i get it back on? Thanks in advance Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertmilinski (talk • contribs) 10:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertmilinski: Hi,
As for any content previously published elsewhere, please send a permission via COM:OTRS, and do not reupload. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Yann. Because you improperly closed a DR.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhhossein (talk • contribs)

@Mhhossein: Please learn to sign your post before reporting people doing their job. Yann (talk) 13:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, I received a warning on my talk page that the two files would be deleted unless their respective sources were listed properly. The sources for the files are listed on their respective pages. Could you offer some clarification as to what is missing for these files? Many thanks! --Ivi104 (talk) 14:45, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ivi104,
Yes, right. I fixed the source in each file, and removed the warnings. Could you please add a meaningful descriptoion for each file? Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:08, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New upload

Hi yann, I was wondering if I could upload this image, because I want to make a userbox that I'm a fan of the divergent saga, but, I do not know, it made me better to ask you first ... Cookies1001 (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cookies1001,
You can't upload this on Commons without a permission 1. from the photographer, 2. from the publisher, as it is a derivative work. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh thanks Yann Cookies1001 (talk) 20:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann, il y a plusieurs erreurs dans le fichier supra : le nom du fichier est Jeannel, Julien François alors qu'il s'agit du fils de Julien-François c'est à dire Maurice. D'autre part dans description la personne représentée est WARREN (Kenneth S.). Le fichier supra est tiré de File:Maurice Jeannel 2.jpg. J'ai modifié la catégorie en Maurice Jeannel. Cordialement--Amage9 (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Amage9,
J'ai corrigé. @David Benoist (BIU Sante): D'où vient la mention de WARREN (Kenneth S.) ici ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci Yann! Cordialement--Amage9 (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Small mistake

I saw that a nom made by Famberhorst had been closed with a typo that made it "not featured" when it in fact was featured. I fixed the typo but FPCBot had already gone through the motions of removing it from the list and marked it as 'not featured'. I've added the featured assessment manually to the file and placed it at Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural. I'm just not sure if this is enough or if there is something else I should do with it since I haven't been closing FPCs for very long yet. Do you think you could take a look at this and see if everything is ok? I pinged Famberhorst to let him know what's going on and explain why he didn't get a FP notification on his talk page. Also pinging PumpkinSky who made the typo, asking him to check twice next time he's closing an FP nom. . Thanks! --cart-Talk 21:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OOPS. Sorry everyone. Thanks for fixing it Cart. Myi apologies to all. PumpkinSky talk 22:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I added the award to Famberhorst's talk page: [3]. I think it is fine now. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good evening all, Everybody thanks for the effort! Sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block me?

I'm just wondering why you blocked me, you seem to have vastly different rules than other reviewers. Lets start with you saying the Youtube CC license is a bogus license, it isn't, actually, according to reviewer who allowed File:Jake_Paul_2016.png through which didn't ask permission from Jake Paul who is a huge youtube star and also didn't throw away the fact the Youtube CC license was used (which isn't even a license, its actually a template Template:YouTube_CC-BY which has been featured in files that have been approved by different reviewers including Amitie_10g (on the image File:MadeInTYO.png), DAJF (on the image File:Lil_Uzi_Vert.png), Christian_Ferrer (on the image File:Young_Thug_screenshot.jpg) and various others. No permission was needed due to these people actually reading what was provided in the template. I have to ask you why you blocked me for doing this while you're clearly not following the standards set by other reviewers and excluding me. You also removed my image that was a mugshot taken by the state of Florida where I provided permission. Seriously dude? Can I report you somewhere? WolvesS (talk) 20:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WolvesS,
I blocked you because you uploaded files which are copyright violation, and you inserted bogus licenses. So far, you have uploaded 37 files, and among these 27 were deleted as copyvios. Not a good record, so I suggest you get mellow, read Commons rules and follow them... Regards, Yann (talk) 20:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Jean Galmiche-Henri Cochet

Bonjour Yann, puis-je utiliser cette photo Jean galmiche et henri Cochet (à gauche) de 1946, elle a été prise par Dominique Galmiche fille de Jean Galmiche et est en "domaine public". Cordialement--Amage9 (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Amage9, En quoi Béatrice Humbert, la titulaire du compte Flickr, est liée avec la photographe ? S'il n'y a pas de lien, il faut une autorisation de Dominique Galmiche. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci Yann, je ne connais pas Béatrice Humbert mais je peux demander l'autorisation de Dominique Galmiche. Cordialement--Amage9 (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dominique Galmiche a retourné le formulaire de permission le 2 août, puis-je mettre la photo sur WM ?--Amage9 (talk) 07:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Amage9 : Oui. N'oublie pas d'ajouter {{OTRS pending}} dans le champ "Permission" de la description du fichier. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci Yann, tu as bien fait de me rappeler l'OTRS je l'aurais complètement oublié. cordialement--Amage9 (talk) 15:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dmitry Moor 1920 Did you volunteer.jpg

What was the point in restoring an image only to delete it again? Chris Troutman (talk) 21:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris,
I found out: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/05#Copyright of old Russian works. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh. Thanks for letting me know. I grow weary of this trend in copyright law that protection seems to last forever minus one day. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image 2

Hello Yann, look at this image, it's for a userbox (my hobby for them), and the question here is ... can I upload it with the right permissions? Oh, sorry if you do not recognize me, but I changed the name of Cookies1001 to Lenx BC.

Plisss?? ok no xd Lenx BC (talk) 01:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Lenx BC[reply]

Hi Lenx BC, No. You can only upload images taken by you. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rahul Bott (talk) 08:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked and my uploaded files were deleted even after providing valid copyrights proof.

Dear Yann,

My account was blocked and all my uploaded work was deleted even when I had provided the genuine copyrights to Wikipedia at earlier point in time. Can you provide a valid clarification for blocking my account and deletion of my work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himanshu.engin (talk • contribs) 10:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Himanshu.engin: Hi,
You were asked in March 2016 not to upload copyright violations. After you still uploaded more copyright violations. Manav Uthhan Sewa Samiti has to send a formal written permission if you want to upload files on its behalf. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whitesachem

Hello, I wrote you some responses concerning copyright on my talk page. --Whitesachem (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Could you please elaborate on this. Map designs are copyrightable and given map design seems to come from Mapbox, which hasn't published its materials under free license. So how is this copyright status OK here? 62.65.58.165 18:55, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After looking again, it appears to be CC-BY-NC-SA only. Deleted. BTW would you creating an account or log in? Regards, Yann (talk) 19:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further questions

Yann,

I'm not a wiki user, nor do I plan on becoming a master wiki editor. I declare my ignorance in this realm freely. I am working with wikipedia in order to correctly supply the necessary information. I am in no way using photo's illegally. Please help me if I am missing something. Declaring that I am under copyright violation over and over just isn't helpful to me, as I do not understand how this is so. I understand it may be frustrating to explain this to someone who isn't familiar with Wikipedia, I'm happy to fix what is necessary I just need to guidance. I emailed 2 documents stating that I am authorized to use the Jeff Garner photos when requested. In addition to that, the documentation states that the photographer, released rights to Jeff Garner. He is the owner. I have permission to use the photos, the documentation was already sent to the links provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amberrstrach (talk • contribs) 19:22, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Amberrstrach: Hi,
You uploaded 3 files with 3 different authors or copyright owners without the needed permission. Please do not do that again. If you sent a permission to OTRS, the files will be restored once the permission is validated. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status?

Hi! I was wondering what license File:Fragment Fasti Ostienses.jpg should be under. It looks to have been taken from this website. Their main page is pretty clear about people needing to request permission to use their images, however I didn't know if this image would be different since it's a very basic picture of a very old stone tablet (or at least what remains of it). If it's copyvio it'd need to be deleted, but I wanted to get some extra input on this one. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Ok, i understand and im sorry for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adjana99 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of image File:Juan Carlos Rojas.jpg

Hi Yann.

Several weeks ago you deleted an image I uploaded Juan Carlos rojas.jpg . You stated I was incurring in copyright violations and I provided proof from the author of the image that he agreed to give his image for use in Wikipedia. I provided his release form.

I also followed the procedure to ask for undulation of this image.

But as of now, the image does not appear in Wikimedia Commons. I have not received any message from you or from Wikimedia on the matter. I saw an instruction that I should not upload this file again, but there is no news of the status of this image.

I would like to know what procedure should I follow to use this image for my article. I have the image, I have all the necessary data and a release form to prove that it is suited for use in Wikimedia Commons.

Thank you.

David. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DvargasCRI (talk • contribs) 17:32, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DvargasCRI: Hi, The description says the author is Luis Alvarado / PME Images. Did he send a permission via COM:OTRS? Do you have the ticketnumber? Regards, Yann (talk) 19:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright: Thefilter

Yann, thanks for concern, but the image recently deleted that is titled "Bum Phillips Opera" was taken by a photographer who provided an email stating that I have the rights to use the image and release it to Wikimedia Commons. The photographer emailed everything to Arthur Crombez at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefilter (talk • contribs) 13:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Thefilter: Hi,
OK, fine. The file will be restored when the permission is validated. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copy Right Violation in the context of Articel on Adam Tellmeister

Hi, thanks so much for taking care of a copy rights violation I was not aware of. but I am a little bit suprised: the author of te pictures had sent an Email to Permissions Wikimedia Commons just as it was told to do so in the instructions on Commons. I just wanted to let you know that I am very much aware of the issue and appreciate you concern, we will adress the issue, best Jenni — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenniwinterhagen (talk • contribs) 17:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jenniwinterhagen:
Thanks for your message. The files will be restored when the permission is validated. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

a sudden wave of deletion

hi Yann, can you have a look at all these deletion requests and tell me what we can do? It seems that DeuxPlusQuatre and me are under sudden scrutiny. --Nattes à chat (talk) 23:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nattes à chat: Hi, I closed some of them and warned this user. But why did you upload such small images such as File:Photo Thérèse Moreau.png? It is barely useable. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of image File:Juan Carlos Rojas.jpg, Ticket number

Hi Yann, the ticket number I have for the submission of documentation is ticket:2017071210017675.

Regards

DVargasCRI — Preceding unsigned comment added by DvargasCRI (talk • contribs) 00:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DvargasCRI: Hi, I restored the file, but a volunteer who knows the language needs to validate the permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue

Hi Yann!

A picture was given by the author for the purpose of using it in her biography. The picture was taken during a class This is the picture File:Yvonne_Denis_Rosario.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMelendez (talk • contribs) 15:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MMelendez: Hi,
We need a permission from the photographer, who most probably owns the copyright. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Active admin

Hi. Now that you're available, Category talk:Task Force Tips is an appropriate use of a talk page? A discussion has been created and, instead of participating at the CfD process, the talk page is being used for promotion, IMHO. If I'm wrong, don't delete the said TP. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 15:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

While I was trying to develop my spelling, some discussion has begun, apparently. Still I believe the TP of the cat is not used correctly. Best. --E4024 (talk) 15:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rahul Bott (talk) 07:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photos du chemin de croix à l'église Saint-Jean-Baptiste au Béguinage

Bonjours, dans la galerie de Saint Jean-Baptiste au Béguinage (Bruxelles) vous avez téléchargé des photos d'un chemin de croix pictural. Cependant celui-ci ne se trouve pas dans l'église en question, je viens d'aller vérifier sur place et le chemin de croix est en platre (comme référencé dans un livre que je possède qui fait un inventaire complet de l'église et ne comporte pas de mentions d'un chemin de croix pictural

Bref je pense que vous avez fait une erreur

Bien à vous,

Pierre — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saule1508 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Saule1508: Bonjour,
Je pense que vous voulez parler de Category:Stations of the Cross, Saint-Jean-Baptiste au Béguinage, Brussels. J'ai bien pris ces photos dans cette église. Je n'en ai jamais visité d'autres à Bruxelles. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, ce chemin de croix se trouve actuellement dans l'église Sainte Catherine qui est juste à côté. L'église Sainte Catherine a été longtemps fermée et a ré-ouvert récemment après rénovation, peut-être que ce chemin de croix avait été déplacé temporairement dans l'église Saint Jean-Baptiste au béguinage ? Quoiqu'il en soit j'ai été dans les deux églises tout à l'heure et dans Sainte Catherine j'ai pu prendre une photo d'une des stations. A part le fait que vos photos sont vraiment plus belles que la mienne, c'est bien ce même chemin de croix que j'ai pu photographier dans Sainte Catherine. Dans l'église Saint Jean Baptiste c'est un chemin de croix en platre. Je vais essayer de télécharger mes photos. Merci et cordialement.
@Saule1508: Notez que j'ai pris ces photos en 2009. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 22:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

note about uk photographs, at least pre-1923

FYI. I have found a solid reference that talks about UK photographs under the 1911 Copyright Act having copyright of 50 years post negative development, and not the 70+ years PMA as some try to apply. I am unsure how readily applicable it is to photographs published from 1923 as US copyright will have its variation. It definitely helps us with anything UK pre 1923, like with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cecil M. Hepworth 1915.jpg At some point I will try and get that work into enWS (well maybe).  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

interestingly we already have the scan at enWS and have had for ages, relevant page is s:Page:The copyright act, 1911, annotated.djvu/145  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
billinghurst: Thanks, that's useful. The issue is "does this apply also when the photographer is known?" May be, you should post on COM:VPC. Pinging @Clindberg: Opinions? Regards, Yann (talk) 13:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I now have that specific section done s:The Copyright Act, 1911, annotated/Section 21. My reading is that the photographer is irrelevant, and it is the negative that is pertinent. Then it is 50 years flat! So as we are past 50 years from those images, that the next change comes in 1956 and the transition arrangements are specific s:Copyright Act, 1956 (United Kingdom)/Schedule 7 (point 2) in that they are still 50 years from date of photograph.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Which will then carry forward to the 1988 Act, so any UK photographs taken prior to 1937 are simply out of copyright in the UK. Prior to taking it to VPC, just want to get some more ducks in order.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No. The UK enacted the EU copyright directive on January 1, 1996, which restored copyright in those photographs to a 70pma term, regardless of what the term was before. Those are termed "revived copyrights" in that law, which has certain protections for existing exploitations, but those do not help us. You are correct that the term was 50 years from creation before that date, but a massive number of photographs had their copyright restored that day. And since that coincided with the URAA, most of those same photographs were restored in the U.S. as well. The only photographs where the 50 year term still applies are Crown Copyright photographs. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also note Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2011/07#Photos_published_in_UK_before_1st_June_1957. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe there will be an upside to Brexit.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't that be nice (although we'd still have the 95-years-from-publication U.S. copyright to deal with). However... I'm guessing rage over the copyright law was not the driving force behind Brexit ;-) Usually most other laws are just left alone (and may be important to maintaining trade relations, etc.). But... yeah, would be nice to have some of their shorter terms back. (One copyright-related downside to Brexit is that the UK is more likely to keep their extremely low threshold of originality, instead of moving towards the EU "bear the imprint of the personality of the author" level, the way some EU decisions were forcing them to. But we'll see.) Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:76ers vs Hawks 2003.jpg

Greetings. I noticed that several months back you have submitted a successful deletion request for the following: Commons:Deletion requests/File:76ers vs Hawks 2003.jpg.

The uploader of the said file has contributed additional images that appear to be taken from the same source (photographs of a basketball game from 2003 featuring the 76ers and Hawks). In your request, you mentioned that the photo was taken from Facebook. Do you happen to know the source of that photo? The reason being is so that we can identify whether other images on the Commons may also be subject for deletion?

Thank you. --Amineshaker (talk) 15:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amineshaker,
No idea about the source. The EXIF data of this file shows that it comes from Facebook. AFAIK, other files uploaded by this account come from Flickr and have a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not licenced pics

Dear Yan

Ref your-

"Thanks for uploading File:Clarkson 3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you."

and

"Thanks for uploading File:James bay.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you."

What are you talking about ? These were taken in a public place and as stated in the details I took them.

Please explain your interference.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Londonpixels (talk • contribs) 22:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Londonpixels: Hi,
Both these iamges mention Alamy Live News in the EXIF data. Many agencies require exclusive rights, so a confirmation via COM:OTRS would be better. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permission received

Hi Yann, regarding the photo File:Photos piano-left.jpg that you deleted recently: Permission has been received in Template:OTRS ticket. The subject took the photo of himself using the self-timer on his camera. Would you please restore it and tag it appropriately? Anachronist (talk) 18:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anachronist,
I can't see the ticket, it seems to be in the wrong queue. Please ask on COM:UDR. This file is very small, I would ask to upload the original one. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The ticket is in the info-en queue; the permission is part of a longer thread I was handling. I'll ask the user to upload the original (he attached it to the permission email). Anachronist (talk) 16:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, Please check if I can add this photo File:Lr2.jpg instead of the pics taken down earlier. Please give me proper confirmation from whomsoever is concerned and only then I'll go ahead and add it to the wiki page. I want to avoid future explanations 1 or 2 years down the line. So to avoid such confusions, please let me know if this file can be added or permissible. I have also sent 2 messages to Commons: OTRS 7leumas 17:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 7leumas,
No. This is copied from Getty, so a permission from the copyright owner is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry its not Lr2.jpg, but another new file named File:2lr.jpg (its a completely different one). What you are referring to is the old pic. I can post the image link here to see its not the same. 7leumas 21:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The copyright owner needs to send a formal written permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two of each

I have no clue of how mutiple accounts or duplicate files work here yet, so could you please take a look at this? Best, --cart-Talk 13:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Deleted. This account has acknowledged to be the same person. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Cohen image

Hi,

Why was the image of Tony Cohen removed from commons? It was linking to a article of him relating to his work as a sound engineer. He died august 2nd this year. I have permission from the author so I do not understand why you deleted it.

I believe I followed all instructions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.136.96.57 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please log in and mention the complete file name. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

merci et au revoir

Tu ne connais pas l'histoire. J'en ai marre de voir continuellement détruites mes contributions à Commons par un seul utilizateur - policier pour des présumées et pas démontrables affaires de copyright. Quand j'ai soulevé des objections je n'ai pas reçu de réponses. Toutefois le probléme est dejà résòu car j'ai décidé de ne plus charger rien sur Commons, ansi vous pouvez faire votre encyclopédie bien protegée comme vous voulez. --Francescosaverio50 (talk) 17:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Francescosaverio50,
C'est comme vous voulez. Mais sachez que Racconish est un utilisateur expérimenté. S'il y a un désaccord, vous pouvez toujours demander des explications, mais en respectant les personnes. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:John Collier, Jr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 20:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Problème en VI

Salut Yann,

J'ai un problème avec cette nomination. En fait un ornithologue anglais nous a signalé une erreur de détermination, qui s'est avérée juste. J'ai corrigé et renommer le fichier, enlevé les images là où elle ne devaient pas être etc... mais il faudrait effacer sa promotion en VI et je ne sais pas faire. Dans un mois je représenterai l'image nouvellement renommée au concours de VI. Merci de ce que tu pourra faire Bonne soirée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus,
Je ne sais pas s'il faut vraiment supprimer cette page, ou simplement la marquer comme invalide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci à vous deux! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression stp

Bonjour,

peux-tu supprimer mon ancienne page utilistateur stp --Le ciel est par dessus le toit (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Le ciel est par dessus le toit,
On ne supprime pas les pages utilisateur, mais tu peux faire une redirection vers ta page actuelle. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archived abuse filter issues without resolution

Your edit, Special:Diff/256041099, archived a lot of issues which were unanswered. Did you look at all of them?

Specifically, the one about Special:AbuseFilter/56 seems to be unresolved and the filter could be changed to exclude this valid use case. Could you please act upon it or unarchive it? 2001:2003:54FA:2F79:0:0:0:1 13:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Frankly, I don't think most people expect an answer there. If the filter needs some changes, please ask the relevant people (who certainly follow that page, so I suppose that, if they didn't act after several months, it is because they think that a change isn't needed). Regards, Yann (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Evil IP address created the filter and doesn't seem to be active. @Rillke made the last edit and is also inactive, that leaves with @King of Hearts and AFBorchert. Advice? In future, can I unarchive issues I see as fit requiring an answer (not all of them)? 2001:2003:54FA:2F79:0:0:0:1 14:55, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) You are free to unarchive is you see the issue actually needs some answer, and leave a note on the issue about why it is so. I personally don't find many such issues (many are expected behaviours) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 20:39, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Zhuyifei1999: : There's another issue: I tried unarchiving, but was partly prevented doing so by Special:AbuseFilter/117. Now it's duplicated in both active discussions and archives. 2001:2003:54FA:2F79:0:0:0:1 07:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shame

Honestly, you totally erred in deleting the March 25 file, I was ashamed, until finally see this and this and immediately remove the deletion(by google translator). Micael D. (talk) 14:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Micael D.,
Could you please mention which file you are talking about? Also please remain civil. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I just do not have much patience for the wikimedia projects, I mean, this file: Multidao_25março, In the links that I sent you says: "Agência Brasil (who took the image) offers free content. All content of the Agency is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Brazil License, thanks(by google translator). Micael D. (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Micael D., You need to be patient. We are all volunteers here. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I do not collaborate very much in the commons, I collaborated in Wikipedia until they banished me in Undefined, I collaborate there in wikinews in Portuguese, and upete this file because I did not find any other equal, and upei only after verifying the licenses, I am not so discussed So, thank you for the reception, by google translator, Micael D. (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeannel

Bonjour

Et merci de vous être occupé des erreurs dans le fichier que nous avons uploadé :

"File:Jeannel, Julien François (1814-1896) CIPA0300.jpg Bonjour Yann, il y a plusieurs erreurs dans le fichier supra : le nom du fichier est Jeannel, Julien François alors qu'il s'agit du fils de Julien-François c'est à dire Maurice. D'autre part dans description la personne représentée est WARREN (Kenneth S.). Le fichier supra est tiré de File:Maurice Jeannel 2.jpg. J'ai modifié la catégorie en Maurice Jeannel. Cordialement--Amage9 (d) 16:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour Amage9, J'ai corrigé. @David Benoist (BIU Sante): D'où vient la mention de WARREN (Kenneth S.) ici ? Cordialement, Yann (d) 15:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)"

Nous allons en profiter pour corriger ces coquilles dans notre propre base.

Bien cordialement

David Benoist

Fregio Storico Savoia Cavalleria

dear Yann, I uploaded photo that were taken by my brother during his job activity. and there is no copyright. These are public photos. I don't understand what I have to do to use these photos. I'm NOT a copyright violator! Please write me what I have to do to avoid the delete of these photos.

thank you

Gerometta Luca — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geroluke (talk • contribs) 20:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Geroluke: Hi,
Please ask your brother to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this page:

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggimento_%22Savoia_Cavalleria%22_(3%C2%BA)

you may find the same picture you are contesting. Gerometta Luca — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geroluke (talk • contribs) 20:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Geroluke: Hi,
Could you please mention which file you talking about? Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this one

Problemi con l'immagine: File:Stemma storico di savoia cavalleria.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geroluke (talk • contribs) 17:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Geroluke: Hi,
The source link is broken, there is no date, and no evidence of a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the link is not broken: File:Stemma_storico_di_savoia_cavalleria.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geroluke (talk • contribs) 20:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Geroluke: Hi,
This is not the source, which is [4]. Anyway, Matteo Sommaruga has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann ! C'est moi qui avais signalé le manque de permission explicite des photos dans cette catégorie sur une actrice pornographique. Or, fr:Utilisateur:Sg7438 m'a signalé qu'il y avait un ticket donnant les permissions : Ticket:2017081710000903. Cela est-il suffisant pour procéder à la restauration de ces images ? Pippobuono (talk) 07:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, ça semble bon. Je restaure les fichiers et laisse @AntonierCH: ajouter les autorisations. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour ta réactivité Pippobuono (talk) 08:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Informe ataqueNIC VE-1

Until now I couldn't see the question in the undeletion discussion, sorry for any inconvenience. As far as I understand the Law of Copyright also applies to announcements since in order, for instance, for a law to have legal effect it must have public acknowledgment, which is the reason why is the reason why laws, agreements, announcements and orders are published in the Gaceta Oficial. At the moment I haven't found the original source stating this, is it needed for the file to be undeleted? Regards --Jamez42 (talk) 19:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamez42,
Could you please mention which file you talking about? Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Of course, File:Informe ataqueNIC VE-1.pdf --Jamez42 (talk) 19:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Natuur12 and EugeneZelenko: Opinions? Yann (talk) 12:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that the file wasn't properly tagged, the uploader made a false own work claim and the PD status was unclear. Which license tagg should be used according to you Jamez42? Natuur12 (talk) 12:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Natuur12: {{PD-VenezuelaGov}}, I managed to explain the reasons two days ago in the undeletion requests, but the nomination was closed before I could answer with the argument above. I understand that the request was closed and apologize once again for the inconvenience, I just wanted to give my thoughts about the question of the request. --Jamez42 (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International Federation for Interior Architects/Designers

Dear Yann,

My apologies for the delayed response. My name is Maxx Baldassare and I am an employee of IFI. My position at this international non-profit is the IFI Membership Services Coordinator and as proof, my email is staff@ifiworld.org. Feel free to contact me.

I am trying to update our Wikipedia page and the two problems that I continue to run into are • copyright infringement • using promotional language

I have put a lot of work into the page and I am not trying to do anything illegal. All my work is currently deleted and when I undo the delete and try to make it less promotional, it still ends up being deleted.

I do not want my account to be deactivated, but it is my job I to update the Wikipedia page. Is there any way you can assist me on this? I do not want to get in trouble with either Wikipedia or my employer.

How can I prove that we own the graphics and photos we used as well as not use promotional material/words?

Thank you in advance and my apologies for my mistakes.

Warm regards, Maxx — Preceding unsigned comment added by IFIstaff (talk • contribs) 17:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@IFIstaff: Hi,
You should confirm your account via COM:OTRS, so that any file you upload is automatically accepted. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:09, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion of Raphaël Granier de Cassagnac images with flag

You have a COI and bias, since you voted for keep and also support for it to be restored. A third party uninvolved admin should do such actions, not ones that have voted. Bidgee (talk) 14:48, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sorry, but no. That would mean that admins can't give their opinions. I have been doing that for more than 10 years now. Nothing new here. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What, Commons only has one Admin? You know that you should abstain from an action on something that you've been a part of. Bidgee (talk) 15:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bidgee, please be reasonable. I answer undeletion requests almost daily for years. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:32, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is that the best excuse you can come up with? I'm rather disappointed in you. Bidgee (talk) 15:36, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Yann undeleting files they voted on. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.
Bidgee (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Undeletion requests

Except for Yann, I had recently made two requests to COM:UDR Concerning some of the files of some portraits and vintage photographs, where some administrators had confirmed to me that the following files are absolutely in PD, but have not yet been restored, I would not want the request to be empty, so I can ask you to ask If you have time to restore the files and check their licenses, as you did today with the portrait of Francis Joseph, scrupulously analyzed by you please :) ??

Some of the administrator's views are very cautious about the files and the following copyright, but they seem to confirm that in the good faith of uploading the files required to be restored are all safe PD,, I hope you can find the time for the reset I also enjoy that you've been bothering me right now on the restored files eheheheheh thanks :) --87.14.89.32 16:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the warning.

--fedaro (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Over ten years of hard work and too many AN/U posts for your trouble. You deserve something nice for a change. Guanaco (talk) 21:25, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Guanaco, I appreciate it. Yann (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please verify these images.

Sir please can you verify these images from Bollywood Hungama

Please sir verify these images by passing review. Regards, YAP123456 (talk) 16:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:لواء يازجي صورة شخصية.jpg

Hi! I asked permission for this photo: File:لواء يازجي صورة شخصية.jpg - it is received (to permissions-de and permissions-commons-de) at 18:49 in Hungarian time. :o) Can you check? Fauvirt (talk) 21:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question on licensing

Hello Yann! I have a question in regards to licensing, and I want an admin's opinion before I contact the university. Western Kentucky University has a 'Media Kit' for its president, and states the following on its website:

The following information is publicly available for use by members of the press and has been provided by the WKU Office of Media Relations.

Is that releasing it in the PD or do I still need to contact them to gain permission? I have my opinions, but they may not be correct! Thanks, Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 23:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Corkythehornetfan,
No, that's not sufficient for Commons. "publicly available for use by members of the press" is not a free license. We need a permission for any use by anyone. Regards, Yann (talk) 01:18, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I figured... thanks for the response! Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 01:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]