User talk:Xenophon/Archive 6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello. An editor of a Russian article (ru:Индонезия) says the kris should be vertical, but the Orientation tag caused counter-clockwise rotation of the image. I removed the tag, so the image is not rotated anymore. Could you please check if it’s orientated correctly now? Thanks. --AVRS (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi AVRS, the effort you did is really not necessary: the compression optimization did gain 20 KB at maximum and the wrong EXIF Orientation tag removal would also be done by a simple Rotatebot request (e.g. using RotateLink). :-)
We are aware that Xenophon's software produces wrong EXIF tags (see above). It is correct now. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Fehlende Lizenz

Hallo Xenophon, kannst Du dort bitte noch eine Lizenzvorlage ergänzen? --:bdk: 23:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Drehen

Hallo Xenophon, ich sehe, dass du gerade fleißig deine Bilder drehst - super - aber, falls du dir auch andere Arbeit vorstellen kannst, dann kannst du auch noch ein wenig warten bis sich andere Leute hier auch um deine Bilder kümmern. Nur als Hinweis. Wenn du eh mal wieder alle deine Bilder ansehen willst, dann mache nur weiter - dann haben andere weniger zu tun. Allerdings würden andere es vielleicht mit weniger Zeitaufwand pro Bild als du schaffen (noch mehr Scriptunterstützung). Viele Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende! --Saibo (Δ) 18:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

die geretteten götter

Hallo xenophon, warum hast denn bei der kategorie Category:Die Geretteten Götter aus dem Palast vom Tell Halaf , die ausstellungs-kategorien entfernt? das war eine sonderstellung im vergangenen jahr im pergamon-museum in berlin, die gezeigten objekten werden nicht ständig gezeigt. liebe grüße und ein schönes osterfest --Z thomas 09:58, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

jaja, man sollte mal die versionsgeschichte richtig lesen udn die difflinks richtig deuten :-) hab nix zu meckern... viele grüße --Z thomas 12:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Using one of your pictures in a textbook

I will be including your picture of the tumulus model at the German National Museum, Nuremberg (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GNM_-_Hallstatt_Grab.jpg), in a textbook. It will be credited in the legend immediately below, initially to 'Wolfgang Sauber' --let me know if, this being printed text (no hyperlinks, that is), I should add any location, URL, or any other personal or contact information. I can also be contacted at thechabon a a t hot mail d o o t com.

Also, I have been using this great picture for teaching purposes for quite a while already. Thanks for taking it and uploading it.

Iiiiaaaa (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Römische Funde

Hallo Xenophon, ich bin begeistert von Deinen Aufnahmen aus den römischen Museen. Leider sind einige Bilder so spärlich beschriftet, daß sie sich leider nicht zuordnen lassen. So können sie uns bei unserem "Projekt römischer Limes" in der deutschen Wikipedia teilweise nicht zur Ilustration von Artikeln weiterhelfen. Sollte es möglich sein, wenigsten den Fundort (falls möglich) einiger Deiner Fotos (jetzt nicht so klare Sachen wie der Weißenburger Tempelschatz) anzugeben, kann das sehr helfen, Deine Bilder auch an den jeweiligen Fundorten in Artikeln zu präsentieren. Eine Fibel ohne Fundortangabe beispielsweise, kann nur extrem schwer zugeordnet werden. Danke. Mediatus (talk) 13:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Kategorisierung von Denkmälern

Hallo Xenophon, du hast einige Denkmalkategorien in der Hierarchie nach oben verschoben, so etwa bei den Kirchen von Enns. Zufällig sind alle Kirchen in Enns derzeit denkmalgeschützt, aber das muss nicht so bleiben. Es kann eine neue Kirche gebaut werden, oder einer der existierenden Kirchen der Denkmalschutz aberkannt werden. Der Denkmalschutz ist immer eine Eigenschaft der Kirche, des Brücke, des Hauses am Hauptplatz, nicht aber einer Kategorie die Kirchen sammelt oder die Häuser am Hauptplatz vereinigt. An einer Straße oder einem Platz wird das besonders deutlich: auf dem Platz könnten (mit Recht) politische Veranstaltungen, Rohrbrüche, Verkehrsunfälle oder Glatteis fotografiert und kategorisiert werden, die sind aber mitnichten denkmalgeschützt. liebe Grüße aus Wien, --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Moin! Ist das von einer Infotafel abfotografiert und einfach nur ein Foto einer Karte? Viele Grüße, NNW (talk) 11:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Ich habe den Hinweis auf die Infotafel und {{FOP}} hinzugefügt, damit die Datei nicht als Urheberrechtsverletzung gelöscht wird. NNW (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Eleassar (t/p) 12:25, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA English and WP:DACIA română to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 20:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Xenophon,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederwaldkirchen Blasiuskapelle - Fenster 1a Betender.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Not done --Mattbuck 06:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)I made a crop and a perspective correction. Is it ok now ? --Vassil 17:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 17:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Frage zu einem deiner Nepomuks

Hallo Xenophon, magst du dort schauen, ob du helfen kannst. Danke & lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Xenophon. You have new messages at Codrinb's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Codrin.B (talk) 03:54, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Rondel painting

Hello Xenophon. I have two question. Are you an author of this painting? http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soubor:Museum_Quintana_-_Unternberg_1.jpg If You are authour, please contact me (johndensmore@azet.sk). I am muscian and I want to add this painting to my solo album. Lucas --178.41.14.157 17:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Dobrovo - Gradnik-Denkmal.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 19:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Koordinatenwunsch

Hallo Wolfgang, findest du zu deinem Bild 14606 noch die Objektkoordinaten heraus? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

feedback

Hallo Wolfgang, ich sehe ganz viele Bilder im Rahmen der Denkmallisten, von WLM oder Ähnlichem. Auch von dir. Deine Bilder überraschen mich immer positiv, gute Bilder, bewusst ausgewählt, guter Blick fürs Detail, gute weil auch individuelle Beschreibungen, sehr gute Kategorisierung und Strukturierung der Kategorien. Da kann ich ungeschaut das check-Häkchen drunter machen. danke und liebe Grüße --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Šmartno - Festungsmauer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 08:15, 13 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Xenophon,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Xenophon,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Your photograph in Heiligenkreuz Abbey, Austria

Dear Mr. Sauber,

Your photograph of the Temptation in the choir stalls of the Heiligenkreuz Abbey has been included in the app Jesus Art available on Google Play and Amazon Appstore for Android. Within the app, it is under the category Temptation. Thank you for your contribution!

--MrFrosty2 (talk) 22:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Heiliger in La Orotava

Hallo Xenophon! Das [1] ist Petrus oder auch San Pedro.--Koppchen (talk) 09:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC) Der Heilige auf der gegenüber liegenden Seite des Altars ist Santo Domingo.--Koppchen (talk) 10:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Fenster

Hallo Xenophon, mal eine kritische Anmerkung zu Category:Waidhofen an der Thaya - Windows (und bevor du weitere Cats dieser Art anlegst): Je kleinteiliger die Kategoriestruktur angelegt wird, desto schwieriger ist ein Bild zu finden und desto schwieriger wird es, mit Tools wie CatScan sinnvolle Ergebnisse zu bekommen. Meine Gedanken: Die Fenster von z.B. einer Kirche haben einen starken inneren objektbezogenen Zusammenhang. Da kann eine eigene Unterkat zur Kirche sinnvoll sein. Genauso wie bei Altären, Kanzeln, usw. wie du das sehr schön machst. Aber die Fenster einer Gemeinde? Die sind doch eher lose gekoppelt und mir wäre nicht klar, wo ich nach Bildern suchen sollte, suchte ich ein Fenster in NÖ. Ich halte schon die Aufteilung nach Staaten für fragwürdig und die nach Bundesländern jedenfalls. Dass alle Kategorien immer wieder nach geografischen Gesichtspunkten hinunterzerspragelt werden, ist eine Folge der ungünstigen Schnittmengenkategorien, die vorgesehen sind, aber man muss sie ja nicht machen. Nehmen wir an, wir suchen ein schönes Fensterbild mit Steingewände aus dem 17. Jahrhundert. Da hilft die Gliederung der Fenster nach Geographie wenig. Suche ich ein Fenster ausgerechnet in Waidhofen, dann finde ich dieses doch eh in einer der Unterkategorien von Waidhofen, z.B. bei den Gebäuden. Suche ich ein Fenster bei einem bestimmten Gebäude, dann gehe ich nicht über Fenster, sondern über die Kategorie für das Gebäude (die Kirche von oben). Der Unterschied ist nun, dass ich auf einer Seite mit 200 Bildern sehr rasch passende Fensterkandidaten optisch identifizieren kann, während das in einem zerspragelten Kategoriebaum einfach nicht geht. Ich bin ein Sammler, ich fülle (meist existierende) Kategorien mit Bildern. Kaum hat die Kategorie eine nennenswerte Anzahl an Bildern, wird sie weiter geografisch zerteilt. Dabei wäre eine parallele Kategorisierung nach Stil, Alter, Zustand der Fenster vielleicht eine nutzbringendere Variante. In der Regel denke ich, sollten tiefere Kategorieebenen (pro Gemeinde) erst begonnen werden, wenn zwei Ebenen drüber (Staat) alles auf die direkte Ebene drüber (Bundesland) verteilt ist. Kannst du meine Argumentation verstehen? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)