User talk:Xenophon/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sibylle...

Hallo Wolfgang, Du schreibst bei diesem von Dir eingestellten Bild in der Beschreibung, das es ein Fresko von Johann Carlone in Pfarrkirchen i. M. (Mühlkreis?) zeigen würde. Verwendet wird das Bild wohl u.a. hier mit der Beschreibung: Sibylla Samienna, G. Carlone (1584- 1631), Genua, Basilica di Santa Maria Assunta. Den G. Carlone habe ich angesichts des ungefähr passenden Lebenszeitraums mit Giovanni Carlone übersetzt, die Kirche wird aber als in Genua befindlich bezeichnet (kann auch zum Maler gehören) und verlinkt. Da diese Kirche realiter im Lebenszeitraum des Malers in Genua entstanden ist, würde das ungefähr passen, widerspricht aber leider deiner Angabe von Pfarrkirchen. Wenn es sich denn um Pfarrkirchen im Mühlkreis handeln sollte, wird in dem Artikel noch nicht mal eine Kirche erwähnt (kann natürlich am unvollständigen Artikel liegen..., Ort ist aber auch relativ klein, für 'ne Kirche aber nicht zu klein :-))). Darüberhinaus gibst Du den Lebenszeitraum von einem Johann (Giovanni) Carlone aus Rovio hier mit 1636-1713 an. Daraus ergeben sich für mich ein paar Fragen und Vermutungen. Es gibt mindestens zwei Freskomaler Giovanni Carlone, den aus Genua von 1590-1630 und den von Dir genannten aus Rovio von 1636-1713, der bisher in der DE-WP nirgends erwähnt wurde (der Makel würde aber noch einigen mehr aus diesem Familienverbund anhaften...). Das wäre für mich erklärlich und lösbar. Aber wo gehört das Bild hin? Nach Genua in Italien oder nach Pfarrkirchen in Österreich? Dann müsste und sollte möglicherweise die Bildunterschrift im Artikel zur Samischen Sibylle korrigiert oder präzisiert werden. Daher an dieser Stelle meine Bitte an Dich, das Rätsel zu lösen (und mich vllt. auch auf meiner DE-Disk kurz zu informieren). Danke, --Pflastertreter (talk) 19:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Giovanni Nr. 1 gibts jetzt hier, Giovanni Nr.2 gibt's jetzt da. Du mußt Dir jetzt nur den richtigen für die Sibylle aussuchen, nach der angegebenen Jahreszahl und der in der Bildbeschreibung angegebenen Kirche (die aber falsch sein kann) wär's die Nr. 1 (Genua), nach deiner Beschreibung auf Commons die Nr. 2. --Pflastertreter (talk) 22:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Wolfgang,
hast du das Bild in deinem Foto selbst gemalt/gemacht oder ist das "Original" von jemand anders? Falls letzteres zutrifft, von wem ist das Original? In Island gibt es nämlich keine Panoramafreiheit. Das gilt analog für die anderen beiden "Geisterbilder". --Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Hallo, Xenophon.

Schau mal bitte Dein oben genanntes Bild. Ich habe dier Perspektive korrigiert und versucht die Reflektion des Blitzes zu entfernen. Falls Dir die Änderung mißfällt kannst Du sie gerne auch zurücksetzen. Ich bin nur gerade bei den neuen Bilder darüber gestolpert. Gruß --chris 19:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Xenophon!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


Pay attention to copyright
File:Georgiupolis_-_Ortskirche.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Iconoclast (talk) 14:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Inquiry

Dear Xenophon, I am e-mailing from a production company in England and we are making a documentary series for National Geographic. We would love to use the image you have uploaded, Isis-Persephone, within our documentary. Before we can do so, we need to double check this image is in the public domain. It would be great to discuss this further over e-mail. Please e-mail me at Ellie.davis@parthenonentertainment.com.

Many Thanks,

Ellie

We're trying to clear out Category:Old hospitals as too vague & subjective (per CFD discussion). Do you know for File:Erlangen - Frauenklinik.jpg: would it be appropriate to put it in Category:Former hospitals (that is, does the building still exist but no longer function as a hospital)? Any other thoughts on categorizing it would be welcome. - Jmabel ! talk 18:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Same question for File:Nürnberg - Krankenhaus.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 18:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm still awaiting a response from you on this. - Jmabel ! talk 23:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Ship model blueprints

Hello,

I am looking to make a 3D model of a Roman trading ship. I came upon your photo of this model: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marciana_Alta_-_Modell_r%C3%B6misches_Transportschiff_1.jpg

I saw some blueprints of the model visible in the photo.

Is there a place where I could download the model blueprints that are visible in the photo?

Thanks! --Agamemnus (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


Inquiry

Hi Xenophon,

I am interested in using one of your photos as an illustration in a book that I am writing. Could you please contact me: compton@uchicago.edu

Thank you very much! Steve Compton

Hallo Xenophon/Archive 3,

ich habe das Bild Image:Skaftafell - Gelbe Blüten.jpg zu Saxifraga hirculus gestellt, da gemäß Pflanzenliste (vgl. http://www.floraislands.is/plantlist.htm ) bzw. gemäß zugehöriger Galerie http://www.floraislands.is/vascmynd.htm#Sagina m. E. keine andere Möglichkeit besteht. Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Arnreit Kirche - St.Elisabeth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--sугсго 07:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Arnreit Kirche - St.Norbert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--sугсго 07:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Please use the correct date format

Hi Xenophon,

Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you mentioned a date on File:Bordei - Häuser 5.jpg. Please know that in order for dates to be automatically detected and translated into other languages it needs to be in the YYYY-MM-DD format (ie. 2024-01 for January 2024 or 2024-05-09 for 9 May 2024). Also, for other (less specific) dates use {{Other date}} for centuries, ranges, 'circa' etc. like this: {{other date|between|1899|1903}} for "between 1899 and 1903

date QS:P,+1500-00-00T00:00:00Z/6,P1319,+1899-00-00T00:00:00Z/9,P1326,+1903-00-00T00:00:00Z/9

". This way the dates will be translated internally into the user's language preference. I've fixed it for you here. See for example the result in German: here. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 21:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. –Krinkletalk 21:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Category discussion notification Category:Stained_glass_windows_in_Morbach has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Category discussion notification Category:Generals_of_the_Federal_Republic_of_Germany has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

KuK (talk) 14:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Category discussion notification Category:Generals_of_the_Federal_Republic_of_Germany has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

KuK (talk) 14:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Chainmail

Hello, why are you removing images from the chainmail category? samuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Can you show me were in wiki commons the limit is set for the amount of images in a category? Many of the images in the category are not historical chainmail. Almost one half of the images are drawings, fantasy , statuues, or recreations and have nothing to do with historical chainmail. I suggest putting the modern chainmail in a different category if anything as there is no lack of images of modern chainmail but historical images are much harder to find. samuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 12:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
    • I took your suggestion and made categories that matched the images better. As someone who studies historical chainmail I just felt that due to the small amount of real historical armor images available that all the historical images should be kept in at least one place together for easy reference, at least until more images are available. I did not mean any insult by changing your edits I can assure you I know how much time that takes. I think your suggestion was the best course to take. If you do not agree with my changes let me know.samuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Datum postkaart

Ik heb mijn twijfels of File:Antwerpen - Schelde.jpg in 1917 gemaakt is. Mijn vermoeden is dat de postkaart op die datum gepost is, maar dat de foto van eerder is. In 1917 was België bezet door Duitsers en was er weinig tijd om toeristische uitstapjes en fotos te maken. Waarschijnlijk gebruikten de mensen postkaarten vanuit de voorraad van voor de oorlog. Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, now in English,

I have my doubts that File:Antwerpen - Schelde.jpg was the picture was taken in 1917. I suspect that the card was posted in 1917 but made before the war. Antwerp was occupied during the war and I dont think they had a lot of time for tourist excursions en fotos. The people probably used the old postcards supply from before the war to send messages.Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)