User talk:William Avery

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive
Archives
  1. – February 2007

Picture of Doğu Perinçek[edit]

You requested the picture of Doğu Perinçek I uploaded to get deleted. Actually, it's a little complicated about the copyright and I would like to ask you to help me. I uploaded this picture, because my father wanted to use it in an article about Doğu Perinçek. He found the picture in the turkish Wikipedia. Picture in the turkish WIkipedia I thought the picture would have been released into the public domain. ANd it would be also okay if I upload it to Wikicommons. But actually I don't know how to put that "copyrightbox" into it and I have no idea what to do now. So what should I do now? --Lien 14:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of Scott Speed[edit]

I'm sorry, I didn't knew that photos with non-derivative licenses were forbidden. --Mark91it 16:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why copyvio?[edit]

Well, It's self-made, and there's some picture of a statue the movie floating out there... and I need something to illustrate myself, heck --No se que nick poner Visit me/Visítame 22:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I was going to upload a picture of just myself... but I see you went to Deletion requests, so, what can I do? --No se que nick poner Visit me/Visítame 23:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

Just thanks --Herby talk thyme 17:01, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musée départemental d'art ancien et contemporain d'Épinal - esplanade.jpg copyvio?[edit]

Dear William,

may I ask why you thought the image File:Musée départemental d'art ancien et contemporain d'Épinal - esplanade.jpg was a copyvio? I took the photos myself and this was about the building of the museum from Épinal... I do not see what was wrong there... Richieman 17:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, will some day upload a new one.Richieman 11:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Night shyamalan[edit]

Bonjour, j'espère que tu comprends le français ... Pourquoi les images de Night Shyamalan risque d'être supprimées ? Tu me dis qu'elles violent un copyright, or, sur la page de flickr, il est indiqué un CC BY SA, qui est, d'après commons, réutilisable sur commons, non ? Pourrais-tu m'aider car là, je ne comprend pas le problème, et j'en suis désolé ! Stef48 16:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Désolé, je saurais pour la prochaine fois ... C'est quand même super, il reste une image, sur fr, je pense bientot proposer l'article à un label ! Merci pour ton temps, Stef48 16:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Par exemple, je n'ai pas le droit d'utiliser cette image : [1] ? Stef48
Je peux la télécharger sur wikipédia ? Stef48 19:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pas sur wikipédia anglais. Peut-être sur wikipédia français. La communité francophone du Commons:Bistro sont des gens qui suaront. William Avery 19:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai posé la question sur le bistro. Quoiqu'il en soit, merci pour ton aide ! J'ai réussi à trouver une autre image, qui, j'en suis sur, n'est pas à supprimer. Mais si tu veux quand meme y faire un tour, c'est celle sur la category:Night Shyamalan. Cordialement, Stef48 19:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai pas cru que j'y arriveré ... Merci, bonne soirée, Stef48 19:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bon, c'est fort dommage, mais pourrais-tu me traduire ce que tu as marqué sur la page de suppression, pour que j'essaye d'y répondre, même si je pense que l'image sera supprimé, je ne m'y connais pas très bien en licence ! Sinon, la dernière photo téléchargée ne sera pas supprimée ? Ceci est juste une question, et non une attaque :) Cordialement Stef48 16:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About picture of Lempad-The Death of Watugunung King[edit]

Dear William,

I don't understand what you mean, the pic is on the website of Museum Rudana and the founder Mt.Nyoman Rudana, has given permission for using thi pictures for Wiki project. I can ask him permission regarding other project, but what is your suggestion ?

Why every picture is listed to be deleted ? I really don't understand

Thanks.

Mieke

You need to read Commons:Licensing. Please ask any further questions at Commons:Village pump or the relevant deletion page. William Avery 07:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have attach the new email of permission for Wikimedia commons-Lempad Watugunung[edit]

Dear William,

I have attached the permission for using pictures from his museums for wikimedia commons sent by Mr. Rudana, pls check. Tq. Mieke

Antonio Blanco has passed away[edit]

Dear William,

Either I or Mr. Rudana could not ask permission from Antonio Blanco because ha has passed away many years ago. Sorry about that. Mieke


Image:Squirrel Nutkin.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Squirrel Nutkin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lupo 14:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deprecated function in your monobook.js[edit]

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token da0efd9e07c51bd5ce4afda83edfab9c[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Banksy graffiti[edit]

Image deletion warning Banksy graffiti have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Mills dock wall and bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Mbdortmund 18:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment geocoding, please -Pudelek 19:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It put it on my talk page as I was nominator, but it's your pic. Congratulations. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:Steve_Jobs_with_the_Apple_iPad_no_logo.jpg[edit]

File:Steve_Jobs_with_the_Apple_iPad_no_logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eraserhead1 (talk) 23:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maximilian_von_Spee_uncropped.jpg[edit]

File:Maximilian_von_Spee_uncropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 16:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:TayeDiggs.jpg[edit]

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:TayeDiggs.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ italiano ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ українська ∙ svenska ∙ sicilianu ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rotatebot[edit]

Thanks for your mail, I haven't seen that the bot is not working. Hes back at work.

Greetings--Luxo 20:34, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one! William Avery (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Elephant in Monmouth Picture[edit]

I didn't put that copyright onto the picture so I'm not sure I can really help, maybe take it up with the person that did?MonmouthMuseumWales (talk) 11:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. My bad. William Avery (talk) 20:26, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of uploader credit[edit]

Hello, you are being contacted as a user who has previously [or currently] included "* Uploaded by Example" in your file uploads. A bot task has been approved to remove this specific phrase from files because it can be misleading when attempting to attribute the file creator. As an alternative, RileyBot is willing to tag your uploads with a user category instead. Please respond stating if you opt-in and if you have any specific requests (addition of user category, etc); if there is no response within two weeks, consent will be implied. Please note, this message has been left by an automated bot, however, a user will be tracking your response. RileyBot (talk) 01:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear William Avery,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 17jiangz1 (talk) 05:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Former Gardiners Warehouse image[edit]

Hi William, I am putting together an amateur youtube documentary of sorts on Bristol Byzantine. I spruced up the wikipedia page with some extra photos and got rather hooked on the topic. Anyway, I would love to use https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Former_Gardiners_Offices_Bristol.jpg to illustrate some of the unfortunate alterations made to these buildings, however I don't think it will be possible for me to license the whole video as 'sharealike' as I don't have the authority to do that for all content. I was therefore wondering if you would be willing to allow me a CC-BY licence? regards Stevekeiretsu (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to use it. I have decided to release it without restrictions into the public domain, and have updated the page accordingly. William Avery (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wow, that's fantastic. Much obliged. I will credit you anyway (unless for some reason you'd rather I didn't!) Stevekeiretsu (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Entrance of New York Marriott East Side.jpg[edit]

File:Entrance of New York Marriott East Side.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brachys tesselatus.png[edit]

File:Brachys tesselatus.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:William_Avery&oldid=865877593"