User talk:Wagino 20100516

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wagino 20100516!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Wagino 20100516, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Trijnstel_talk 19:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

---

Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Wagino 20100516,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

Trijnstel_talk 21:03, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Kucing peliharaan (6).JPG

File:Kucing peliharaan (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 13:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Wagino 20100516, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 18:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Javanese fonts

Are you able to respond to this question I asked here COM:VPC#Javanese font images? If so please reply there. Ww2censor (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

For Javanese font, I'll trying to share with my friend who knows more about it. Please waiting some time. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the trouble to check this out. Normally fonts are not copyrightable. Just drop me a {{Talkback}} if you find out something and post your reply here. Ww2censor (talk) 10:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

COM:OVERCAT

Hi. Why are you categorizing files that are already in Category:Taken with Nikon Coolpix 2000 into Category:Photos taken with Nikon Coolpix cameras? I take it you're aware of COM:OVERCAT? darkweasel94 07:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I'm inspired from Category:Photos taken with Sony Cyber-shot, but it's look like different case. Sorry, I've made some mistake, maybe! Do I need to restore my edits? Wagino 20100516 (talk) 07:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I didn't find anything in the Sony category that was also categorized in one of the more specific ones, and if there is, that's surely a mistake as well. So, yes, please undo your edits. darkweasel94 08:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Okay! Give me some times to rollback my last edits. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:38, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your kindness and best of luck this year Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 07:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Wow! This is my first barnstar at Commons project. Again, thanks so much! Wagino 20100516 (talk) 09:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Photographs by Ramon FVelasquez

Hi Wagino, I noticed that you are categorizing every photo by Ramon FVelasquez to Category:Photographs by Ramon FVelasquez. I appreciate your efforts but don't assume that an entire category (like Category:San Fabian, Pangasinan) only has photos by Ramon FVelasquez. 2 of my photos were mislabeled (File:San Fabian Pangasinan 1.JPG‎ and File:San Fabian Pangasinan 1.JPG‎). Please carefully check before doing a mass change. Thanks. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Likewise, I've just noticed that a number of my photos have been reattributed in the categories to Ramon FVelasquez - please be more careful. Thanks, Simon Burchell (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

@P199: @Simon Burchell: I always tried to do a review of my work the next days and this morning you has fixed the error first. I would like to thank you and apology for these errors. Yes! Next time I'll be more carefully to my work. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

• I have also been involved in sorting out Ramon's pictures. So I know it's a huge task and sometimes it's easier just to select everything and sort out the exceptions later. Thanks for your work and keep it up! -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Ramon FVelasquez, we thank you Wagino for your great heart and kindness in appreciating the photos.[1] Ramon on short Wikibreak is still awaiting the consensus or voice of Commons administrator if he should retire or continue with commons because of alleged demand for his stopping and or banning due to description and category mistakes, etc. Sincerely for Ramon, Good day.--112.203.176.155 15:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Most users likely to get mistakes and I've personally saw Ramon as a great user, probably only a handful of users can donate as much as a collection of photographs like Ramon. I also keep trying to give the Ramon category at the photos that have been uploaded with summary note Author by Ramon FVelasquez in the next time. You're welcome and nice to meet you. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Wagino 20100516⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Light art

In the more than 200,000 photos using Nikon and Sony by Judge Florentino Floro, the good Judge advised that he shot about 15,000 photos of underwater at night for 2 hours, and pre-selected the best, even submitting all to Nikon office in Manila for scrutiny. You may please look at these, as stub Commons pics for further improvement in category and description including Wikipedia perhaps putting in, ::::In addition, can you please check my art workLight art if you have time, on correct categorizing. Regards--Judgefloro (talk) 15:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC) Note: that the 15,000 photos were shot within 2 hours from 11 pm to 2 am for 6 months and these 29 photos including the profile how photo of User:Judgefloro, according to the good Judge, stands as his objective best photos, the 29 there in Light art in the Philippines of the 200,000. Purely CODED, these Lights will in the future be revealed as one of the deepest secrets of the Universe even dwarfing the fate of the Colliders and Science lights this age. Best of luck and thanks.--Judgefloro (talk) 15:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

@Judgefloro: I've seen the pictures and It's very good images. Sorry! I don't have enough time for other jobs for now because very busy in the real world. You're welcome. -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Oh, good evening Wagino 20100516, thanks also for your time and that you love also the Philippines. Cheers.--Judgefloro (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Wagino 20100516,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Roasted_corns

Roasted corns has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jmabel ! talk 20:29, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Wagino 20100516. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Best of seasons to thee

Thanks for your interest and Advance Happy Seasons, sincerely, User:Judgefloro

With Judge Floro's Total editcount of 455,000 as of today, there is evidence to prove the fact that, as today, greatest number of his photographed Barangays suffered the wrath of the unknown, unseen and Finger of the Almighty, Omnipresent ... but the Wikimedia Commons photos preserves these for priceless Knowledge beyond Time.... sincerely --Judgefloro (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your great and passionate interest in the photos taken by Judge Florentino Floro; and for putting the hidden categories of photos by judgefloro and Nikon camera; as editor, I experience often, slow memory and stress due to computer and net problems, including the times, I assist Judge Floro in the photography and I spent long hours of the night until mornings to edit and upload; very few times that I put these categories and I thank you again for putting them including these hidden categories:470,000 Happy Holidays, best wishes-- --Judgefloro (talk) Judgefloro 16:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

@Judgefloro: You're welcome and many thanks for your photos donation. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks Hello, good morning, I am thanking you so much for loving the Philippines, for in my spirit, the photos are the very soul of Beautiful Philippines, which has never been photographed microscopically, that is, the unreached places, inner sanctum of Barangays, villages and sitios of Mystic Towns and Magic Provinces; --Judgefloro 08:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC) (talk)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Badut (1).JPG

And also:

• File:Badut (2).JPG
• File:Badut (6).JPG
• File:Badut (7).JPG

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Badut (4).JPG

And also:

• File:Badut (5).JPG

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 09:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Badut (3).JPG

File:Badut (3).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: © The Walt Disney Company. This picture mainly focused on Disney-copyrighted animation chracters, and the relevant content is not used de minimis. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

WQL (talk) 05:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (1).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (10).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (10).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (11).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (11).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (12).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (12).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (13).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (13).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (14).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (14).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (2).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (3).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (4).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (5).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (6).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (7).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (7).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (8).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (8).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Mainan anak-anak (9).JPG

File:Mainan anak-anak (9).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I think something went wrong...

...with your edits here. This is a satellite image, certainly not taken with a Nikon and not by whomever that is. — Huntster (t @ c) 08:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thank you for you correction. I'll more be carefully next time. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 09:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)