User talk:Uoaei1/Archive13

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:St. Wolfgang kath. Pfarrkirche Pacher-Altar Taufe 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscher Rauer Kamm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juglans regia Herbstlaub 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtei Seckau Basilika Achteckpfeiler 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Ankogel 20200720 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitzer See Bootshaus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtei Seckau Basilika Achteckpfeiler 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Ankogel 20200720 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Freiburg Münster linkes Seitenschiff Rosettenfenster 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall A 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall C 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Wasserfall C 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20190805 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis adippe auf Centaurea jacea 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis aglaja Mariazell 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helianthemum nummularium Mitterbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horn Pfarrkirche St. Georg 20200727 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia Horn 20200727 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Göller vom Herrenboden 20200904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horn Pfarrkirche St. Georg 20200727 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia Horn 20200727 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:St. Wolfgang kath. Pfarrkirche Pacher-Altar Versuchung 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hepatica nobilis 20210226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and beautiful. --Aristeas 08:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola odorata 20210226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Very nice. --Nefronus 08:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Gampern Kirche Flügelaltar Werktagsseite 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lavant St. Peter und Paul Hochaltar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lavant St. Peter und Paul Hochaltar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Verkündigung 02.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Hallstatt kath. Kirche Knappenaltar Kreuzigung 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry

Hallo! Dein Bild ist wohl versehentlich falsch zurückgesetzt worden: Revision of 553626783. Der Grund ist die fehlende Einordnung in die Kategorie Quality images. Der Baustein {{Quality image}} fehlt. --XRay 💬 10:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Da ist der Fehler entstanden: Revision of 542643751 --XRay 💬 10:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araburg Glockenturm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araburg Glocke 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araburg Glocke 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araburg 20210504 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araburg 20210504 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markersdorf Laurenzikirche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markersdorf Laurenzikirche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bistorta officinalis (European bistort), florescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Scope changed accordingly, thanks for your advice --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
• The scope is perfect. But the caption is poor. In addition to geocoding must put the locality. A good caption ensures better distribution of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done Caption enhanced with locality information --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Geat --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bistorta officinalis (European bistort), florescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Scope changed accordingly, thanks for your advice --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
• The scope is perfect. But the caption is poor. In addition to geocoding must put the locality. A good caption ensures better distribution of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done Caption enhanced with locality information --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Geat --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Maria Schnee 20201031 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus avium Herbstlaub 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Maria Schnee 20201031 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araburg Glockenturm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araburg 20210423 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araburg 20210423 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Pölten Traisen-Au 20210504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araburg 20210423 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ficaria verna 20210410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)  Question These flowers aren't that sharp, but how big are they? -- Ikan Kekek 07:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)  Info The flower diameter is usually ca. 2 to 3 cm. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC) Thanks. In that case, I think it's sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 20:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Maria Schnee Panorama 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hainfeld Wegkreuz-Linde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hainfeld Wegkreuz-Linde 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Lilium martagon Tauerntal 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Christophorus 03.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cornus mas Blüte 20210301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 12:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucanthemopsis alpina Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saxifraga aizoides Tauerntal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saxifraga aizoides Tauerntal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Laschgbach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo Uoaei1,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Kreuzigungsgruppe 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Kreuzigungsgruppe 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Stonebeach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Seebachtal Naturlehrweg Waldpfad 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saponaria pumila Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geum montanum Ankogel verblüht 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium pratense Obervellach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saponaria pumila Ankogel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Böckstein Anlaufbach Furkationszone 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Please add to Wikipedia --Charlesjsharp 11:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soldanella pusilla Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parnassia palustris Tauerntal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 07:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Böckstein Ankogel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formica Bau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Böckstein Radeck-Alm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Böckstein Hörkarbach-Wasserfall 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Geranium pratense Obervellach 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Geranium pratense Obervellach 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Innenraum 06.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hafnerberg Wallfahrtskirche Innenraum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hafnerberg Wallfahrtskirche Innenraum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weißenkirchen in der Wachau Panorama 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. Outstanding colors and sharpness regarding the high resolution, but repair the wire rope on the far left. --Milseburg 19:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nöstach St. Pankraz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürnstein Burgruine 20211024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürnstein Burgruine 20211024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Weißenkirchen in der Wachau Panorama 20211024.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weißenkirchen in der Wachau Panorama 20211024.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dürnstein Burgruine 20211024 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dürnstein Burgruine 20211024 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hafnerberg Wallfahrtskirche Orgel 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hafnerberg Wallfahrtskirche Orgel 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Uoaei1! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, best wishes also to you, George! --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:14, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Friesach Dominikanerkirche Johannesaltar 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Anbetung 02.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Picture of the day for April 24

Dear Uoaei1, I noticed that on April 24, 2022 we have set your featured image. If that date is of not big importance for you, do you mind if we'll change date for that image to April 23 or April 25 (both are available as of moment). The thing is that April 24 is en:Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day and I wanted to set my featured image File:A girl putting flowers to Armenian Genocide memorial. View from top.jpg for that day. If you do not mind, let me know date of your choice and I'll handle moving things around. Thanks beforehand --Xelgen (talk) 22:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Dear Xelgen, I suggest that you pick this day next year, which is also available. This would be the easiest solution, and would make no difference as 2022 is no special anniversary. Regards, Uoaei1 (talk) 07:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Dear Uoaei1, thank you for consideration and suggestion. After thinking for a while, I decided to add (my) photo in question on April 23, this year instead of waiting for another year. Best --Xelgen (talk) 21:35, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Dear Xelgen, if it is so important for you, and you would do all the necessary work yourself, I would not mind if you change the both images --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpenblumen Tauerntal 20190801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aconitum tauricum Tauerntal 20190801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:09, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus cembra Nockberge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus cembra Nockberge 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muscari armeniacum im Schnee 20220403 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Muscari armeniacum im Schnee 20220403 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Muscari armeniacum im Schnee 20220403 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Pyrus communis mit geborstenem Stamm 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wachau vom Vogelberg 20220411 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muscari armeniacum im Schnee 20220403 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus persica Blüten 20220327 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus persica Blüten 20220327 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Uoaei1

Verzeihung, dass ich dir offensichtlich auf die Füße gestiegen bin: [1]. Dein Foto wie auch mein Foto sind in der Category:Assumption of Mary by Tobias Pock (St. Pölten) eingeordnet, die wiederum in die Category:Baroque altars in Lower Austria eingeordnet ist. Also habe ich die Oberkategorie sowohl bei meinem Foto als auch bei deinem entfernt: [2], [3]. Gruß -- Bwag (talk) 16:07, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Bwag, habe ich übersehen. Ich finde allerdings diese Zuordnung trotzdem nicht passend, denn der ganze Hochaltar ist mehr als das Hochaltarbild. Oder andersrum: nur das Pock-Bild ist noch kein ganzer Altar. LG. --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Hochaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Vorhalle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Kapitell 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Portal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Hochaltar der Pfarrkirche Pfarrwerfen, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Hochaltar der Pfarrkirche Pfarrwerfen has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Kapitell 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:11, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Thomas am Blasenstein Klausbach 20220412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Thomas am Blasenstein Kirche 20220412 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The top crop is too tight to me, can you do something about that? --Poco a poco 07:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)  Done --Uoaei1 08:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Thomas am Blasenstein Kirche 20220412 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Tight top crop but still ok as not in the foreground --Poco a poco 07:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Thomas am Blasenstein Bucklwehluckn und Kirche 20220412 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:11, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Thomas am Blasenstein Kirche 20220412 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Thomas am Blasenstein Kirche 20220412 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Thomas am Blasenstein Bucklwehluckn und Kirche 20220412 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Clam Ostseite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Clam Nordostseite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Picea abies Pollen 20220527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Clam Osttrakt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Clam Nordostseite 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Clam Südseite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klamschlucht 20220412 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klamschlucht 20220412 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klamschlucht 20220412 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klamschlucht 20220412 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wachau vom Gochelberg 20220519 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtei Seckau Basilika Innenraum 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtei Seckau Basilika Innenraum 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wachau vom Gochelberg 20220519 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amata phegea Kopula Lobau 20220606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Lobau Mühlwasser 20220606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Nürnberg St. Lorenz Dreikönigsaltar, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Nürnberg St. Lorenz Dreikönigsaltar has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürnstein Panorama 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wachau vom Vogelberg 20220411 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürnstein Burgruine 20220411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Anzbach Pfarrkirche Gnadenstatue 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Anzbach Pfarrkirche Gnadenstatue 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knautia dipsacifolia Mitterbach 20190714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scabiosa columbaria Mitterbach 20190714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nürnberg St. Lorenz Dreikönigsaltar Anbetung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron ferrugineum Ankogel 20190730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz Westseite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 11:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz Westseite 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a small white issue an the left edge to remove. --Milseburg 16:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC)  Done @Milseburg: thanks for your review! --Uoaei1 17:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality of course. --Milseburg 08:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graggerschlucht Wasserfall 20220808 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graggerschlucht Wasserfall 20220808 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz Nordseite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graggerschlucht Wasserfall 20220808 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graggerschlucht Wasserfall 20220808 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Längsee 20220809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georgen am Längsee Maria Wolschart 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georgen am Längsee Maria Wolschart 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal 20220825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Tauerntal Jamnigalm 20220824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Längsee Fischer 20220814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere.--Famberhorst 05:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georgen am Längsee Maria Wolschart 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georgen am Längsee Maria Wolschart 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürnstein Panorama 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georgen am Längsee Wolschart Wegkapelle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine Aggstein 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürnstein Panorama 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürnstein Panorama 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Ankogel 20220816 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Ankogel 20220816 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sorbus aucuparia Tauerntal 20220824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig 20220411 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Westseite 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig 20220411 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Westseite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent! --Ermell 07:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig 20220411 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lycaena virgaureae Tauerntal 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Grabstätte Alma Politzer 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Grabstätte Dingelstedt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Grabstätte Sidonie Grünwald-Zerkowitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Grabstätte Dingelstedt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Famberhorst 05:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Grabstätte Alma Politzer 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger Nievoll-Marterl 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger Gipfelkreuz 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyhra Herbstwald 20221023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capreolus capreolus Wien Zentralfriedhof 20221021 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capreolus capreolus Wien Zentralfriedhof 20221021 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC) background is distracting and quite dark --Charlesjsharp 11:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: do you oppose here or is this just a comment? You set the status from /Promotion back to /Nomination, which is a violation of the process. --Uoaei1 14:57, 7 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality for me.--Famberhorst 17:05, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capreolus capreolus Wien Zentralfriedhof 20221021 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Göriacher Alm 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Göriacher Alm 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger - Hohe Veitsch 20221027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger Nievoll-Marterl 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stiftskirche Nonnberg (Salzburg) – high altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- John Samuel (talk) 19:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stiftskirche Nonnberg (Salzburg) – interior viewing eastwards.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 19:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee A 20221111 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capreolus capreolus Wien Zentralfriedhof 20221021 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Göriacher Alm - Hochschwab 20221027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larix decidua Göriacher Alm 20221027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capreolus capreolus Wien Zentralfriedhof 20221021 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee B 20221021 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagus sylvatica Herbstlaub 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnau Hochanger - Hochschwab 20221027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiDaheim: Gratulation

Hallo Uoaei1,
danke für deine Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation zum 8. Platz in der Sonderkategorie Denkmale mit File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Innenraum 08.jpg!

Du erhältst in Kürze von uns noch eine Mail mit den genaueren Infos zu deinem Preis. Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, –Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 11:16, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capreolus capreolus Wien Zentralfriedhof 20221021 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:48, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee B 20221021 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:48, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Hochaltar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Hochaltar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cornus mas Herbstlaub 20221023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee A 20221111 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Uoaei1! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 00:44, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear George,
Many thanks for your Christmas greetings, and for all your contributions and support in the past year!
I also wish you merry Christmas, and a happy and peaceful new year for you and for the Ukraine!
Best Regards, --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:34, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cornus mas Herbstlaub 20221023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee A 20221111 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee A 20221021 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee A 20221111 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 10:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malus domestica Mitterbach 20221027 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!    -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:11, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear Krzysztof,
Many thanks for your Christmas greetings, and for all your contributions and support in the past year!
I also wish you merry Christmas, and a happy and peaceful new year, with lots of wonderful new images!
Best Regards, Martin --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:14, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

✴ Happy Holidays, Uoaei1 ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! --Aristeas (talk) 11:13, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear Aristeas,
Many thanks for your Christmas greetings, and for all your contributions and support in the past year!
I also wish you merry Christmas, and a happy and peaceful new year, with lots of wonderful new images like the one above!
Best Regards, Martin --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:16, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee A 20221111 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee A 20221111 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ruine Aggstein 20211024.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruine Aggstein 20211024.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)