User talk:Trade/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Are video game mobs copyright violation

I uploaded 2 minecraft files Peyton Dodson 4 (talk) 00:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Mr. Sparkle (203943066).jpg

File:Mr. Sparkle (203943066).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lord Belbury (talk) 11:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Cosplayers with caps

I see that you removed the "Cosplayers with caps" category from Cosplay of Hatsune Miku with caps. Look at this diff. What's wrong with the category I created?--Kai3952 (talk) 11:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

I just think Category:Cosplay clothing seems to be more fitting than 'Cosplayers with objects. @Kai3952: --Trade (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
I think the biggest problem at hand is that there seems to be overlap in the functions of "Category:Cosplay clothing" and "Category:Cosplayers with objects" such as Category:Caps in cosplay and Category:Cosplayers with caps, but I don't know how to resolve it.--Kai3952 (talk) 08:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Should we rename to "XX in cosplay" from all subcategories of the category Cosplayers with objects?--Kai3952 (talk) 09:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
No, the category name is fine as it is. @Kai3952: --Trade (talk) 14:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Why?--Kai3952 (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
@Trade: Could you tell me why you think we don't need to rename to "XX in cosplay"?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I offended you or made you significantly angry. If I did then I apologize. I just want to figure out the difference between "XX in cosplay" and "Cosplayers with XX". If the answer is no difference, then it is time to think long and hard about move to "XX in cosplay" or move to "Cosplayers with XX".--Kai3952 (talk) 11:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
"XX in cosplay" is for clothing while "Cosplayers with XX" is for objects and accessories unless said accessories are considered part of the character's costume. Makes sense? It have been like this before i started to ctegorize cosplay images so it's not really my idea. @Kai3952: --Trade (talk) 14:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

free PNG — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 105.154.162.42 (talk) 01:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Cooper playing with Montague (11219812964).jpg

File:Cooper playing with Montague (11219812964).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

P 1 9 9  ✉ 01:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dronebogus (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Warning

Hi again Trade. I noticed that you've made many malformed deletion requests. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. You did it again in this edit after my reminder in December. One more time, and I will be forced to report your actions.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Men of Algeria in 2008

Category:Men of Algeria in 2008 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

URLs

Hi Trade, thanks for your work! Just a hint: Blacklisted URLs can be entered between <nowiki>...</nowiki> tags: https://www.tradingview.com/u/IRANIBOURSE/. Cheers, Achim55 (talk) 18:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks but i can't seem to get it working @Achim55: --Trade (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Hm, I added it, look at the source text of File:Alexander Hatala, digital marketer & co-founder of Custom Design Partners.jpg. The tagged links are no longer clickable, but that's not a problem. --Achim55 (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Got it@Achim55: --Trade (talk) 20:10, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Andrea Dara XVIII.jpg

Hi Trade, the sites of Italian Chamber and Senate are under cc-by-4.0 license and all contents are free. For this reasons in 2014 it was created the template {{Dati.camera.it}} and {{Senato.it}}--Caulfield (talk) 07:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:ESRB_classification_by_age

Category discussion warning

ESRB classification by age has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 11:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:ModelHub logo.svg

File:ModelHub logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 07:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Relation?

Please could you explain my mentioning here: User_talk:Ankitbhm Estopedist1 (talk) 14:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

A mistake on my part. Sry @Estopedist1: --Trade (talk) 14:55, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Fotos articulo sobre Gia Skova

Buenos dias.

Una consulta.

Tengo unas foto de Gia Skova cedidas por un fotografo.

¿ Que clase de licencia coloco? GEORGEB1989 (talk) 17:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Please see the message i left on your talk page @GEORGEB1989: --Trade (talk) 18:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Out of scope photos

Thanks for opening DR's for out of scope photos. In future you can tag them for speedy deletion as F10 - {{SD|F10}} Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Re:File tagging File:THE BIG BOSS.jpg

@Trade: The source of the File:THE BIG BOSS.jpg is File:Penang Malaysia Street-art-21.jpg not File:The Big Boss poster.JPG (en.wikipedia) --Totino9791 (talk) 11:52, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

People of the United Kingdom by year

Just an FYI but you need to create them like this to get to sort in Europe under "United Kingdom, the" rather than "the United Kingdom." Ricky81682 (talk) 21:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Lipstick

Applying lipstick is a much more specific act than simply wearing lipstick. Perhaps you wish to discuss how best to designate this at Category talk:Lipstick in application. Thanks for your attention. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Top ordering

Hi Trade, I hope you don't mind my changes in this temple, I did it because I personally believe top is visually better than before (100%-wide international & national first, 80%-wide metacat second, plus spacing between "see also" is removed). For example, compare Women of Russia by century (now) and Young women of Germany by year (before). But that's just my personal opinion, and since I tend to keep both technical and visual unification, please tell me do you agree that we make such changes in other related templates? --Orijentolog (talk) 05:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

You have my support Trade (talk) 15:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Previously kept at DR

Please note that File:Ndifreke.jpg and File:Ndifreke Ukpong pix.jpg have been previously kept at DR, and therefore are ineligible for speedy deletion as deleting them would be controversial by definition. You may renominate them for DR if you have fresh arguments to add. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure those two photos were taken from another website. Trade (talk) 16:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Category:AI-generation_related_deletion_requests/pending

Category discussion warning

AI-generation related deletion requests/pending has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Brianjd (talk) 12:10, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Identified

I feel it strange, and misleading, if not inappropriate, for you to move files from Category "Cosplay of films" to "Unidentified cosplay of films" when the films are very specifically identified. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Dumping everything into "Cosplay of films" is inappropriate as it only makes it harder for others to fid what they need.
None of the pictures were in the rightful places within the appropriate category structure. Hence they were moved. If you look at Category:Unidentified cosplay of Star Trek, that is specifically what the template asks people to do before moving them out --Trade (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Fedayeen Saddam helmet.JPG

I'm not sure that cosplay is the correct term for what was an official part of the uniform for a paramilitary force.Geni (talk) 03:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Why is an official part of the uniform for a paramilitary force in a Star Wars subcategory? @Geni: — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Trade (talk • contribs)
Presumably helmet shape was the inspiration for that of Darth Vader's. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Trade/Archive_4&oldid=731131682"