User talk:Tigerente

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Macchia.jpg[edit]

Servus Tigerente! Ich hab gerade dieses Bild von dir gefunden und hab daraus drei Bilder gemacht: Image:Lavandula stoechas Corse.jpg, Image:Cistus incanus Corse.jpg und Image:Cistus monspeliensis Corse.jpg. Zwar wirst du vielleicht mit der Qualität der zusammengeschittenen Bilder unzufrieden sein, aber wenn du siehst, was es zu den beiden Cistus-Arten sonst noch gibt, wirst du mich verstehen. Grüße --Franz Xaver 21:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Franz. Na das passt doch eh gut. Apropos Maccia, hab jetzt endlich mein "Imortallis" Blümchen identifizeren könne, eindeutig Helichrysum stocheas, hab noch ein getrocknetes Exemplar bei mir gefunden mfg --Tigerente 14:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mit "Imortallis" meinst du etwa sowas. In "Flora Europaea" umfasst die "Helichrysum stoechas group" 6 Arten mit mehreren Unterarten und die sind nicht leicht zu bestimmen. Auf Korsika soll es nur Helichrysum italicum geben. Da aber für Sardinien gleich daneben vier Arten (H. stoechas, H. rupestre, H. saxatile und H. italicum) angegeben werden, bin ich da nicht so sicher. Grüße --Franz Xaver 07:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Servus, ich denke du hast recht. Das kommt davon wenn man in seinem BLV Mittelmeer Hefterl nur eine Helichrysum spec. angeführt ist. Muss mir mal bessere Literatur für dieses Gebiet beschaffen. mfg --Tigerente 16:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DrabaAizoides.jpg[edit]

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by adding a suitable copyright tag. --68.216.187.39 20:25, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{Badname}} & license[edit]

Guten Tag, Tigerente. Could you please use the template {{Badname}} instead of using Template:Deletion requests? That page is meant for more complicated and/or urgent deletions. By tagging your wrongly named images with the template they will still be deleted. Thanks in advance for your understanding.

On another subject: maybe you would like to reconsider your licensing? The cartoon explains the benefits of multi-licensing under GFDL ánd CC-BY-SA. NielsF 21:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NielsF, ok i will considers this next time. thanks. --Tigerente 08:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(Sprachmischmasch...) Und zu badname von mir noch der Hinweis, dass du den neuen Namen direkt über die Vorlage mit angeben kannst und solltest, etwa so: {{badname|Image:Trichodes apiarius04.jpg}}. Gruß, da Pete (ばか) 07:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
ack. --Tigerente 07:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons[edit]

Hallo! Bitte setze bei Bildern, die du auf Commons übertragen hast, stets in der ursprünglichen Wikipedia ein {{NowCommons}} auf die Bildbeschreibungsseite. Das erspart anderen Leuten anschließend das große Suchen. --Gruß und Danke Crux 13:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Servus, moment ich Lösche die Bilder ja nachher gleich auf der de-WP. Bringt dann das Baustein setzen etwas? mfg --Tigerente 14:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bosruck.jpg[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Thanks for contributing the image, quality landcape photos are ever needed. --Wikimol 21:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikimol, i really didnt know that such a category exists. i will look into my gallery if i can contribute more images. so long --Tigerente 09:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flora[edit]

Hi Tigerente,

I was on holiday in the Otztal, and took some pix. However, next time I would like a really good Alpenflora. My two present ones are not complete, which makes my work arror prone. Which germen language floras would you advise me for a visit next year?

t.i.a., TeunSpaans 16:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TeunSpaans,

I hope you enjoyed your stay and the weather was fine for hiking. Usually i use

  • Xaver Finkenzeller: Alpenblumen, München 2003, ISBN 3-576-11482-3 (cheap, photos and light (Rucksack), contains 410 species, good description)
  • Thomas Muer: Alpenpflanzen, ISBN 3-800-13374-1 (photos, illustrations, heavier with 500 pages and 1.200 species, short (but sufficient) descriptions)
  • Fischer, M. A., Adler, W. & Oswald K.: Exkursionflora für Österreich, Liechtenstein und Südtirol, Linz, 2005, ISBN 3-85474-140-5 (scientific and complete flora of austria, heavy, using this one for rainy days at home)

mfg --Tigerente 18:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thx. The one I was carrying with me was Alpenpflanzen, by Oskar Angerer en Thomas Muer. I guess its identical to your Thomas Muer: Alpenpflanzen, ISBN 3-800-13374-1. Yes, it must be, the ISBN number is the same, even though listed in a different format. I'll have a look at Exkursionflora for a reference when I get home again.
And yes, we certainly enjoyed our stay even though the weather was very rainy, which limited our opportunities to walk - as a novice in the mountains I didnt want to go up when it rained, as i am not familiar with the risks. But we had two or three very nice trips.
TeunSpaans 21:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

senecio[edit]

I would welcome your opinion on my identification of Senecio incanus. While in the Otztal, I had identified it as S. incanus but looking back I wonder if it isnt S. halleri. You can find them at User:TeunSpaans/gallery#Thu Oct 19 13:59:20 CEST 2006. Height was about 2000-2400 meter.

thanks in advance,

TeunSpaans 05:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, In Austria (and South Tyrol) theres is only Senecio incanus subsp. carniolicus growing. Senecio halleri only from Graian Alps to Valais (Wallis). So it must be S. incanus. Nice photo. I also like the very good Sempervivum habitat! mfg --Tigerente 18:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore the stipe of S. halleri (German: Einköpfiges Greiskraut) ends in only one flower head. mfg --Tigerente 18:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank! TeunSpaans 07:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two more species[edit]

Hi Tigerente,

Are you able to identify two more species?

thanks in advance, Teun Spaans 05:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this are hard ones. I think User:Franz_Xaver can help you on these two plants. mfg --Tigerente 06:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Minuartia_gerardii01.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 15:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

review[edit]

Hi Franz, Tigerente,

I have started uploading the plant pix of our 1 week holiday in Switzerland. I would very much welcome a review of my identifications, and a helping hand with the identification of a few species which i was unable to identify. I will, work allowing, upload the rest in the coming weeks.

They are at my gallery, and the alpine uploads have been marked by mentioning the species in the section headers

thanks in advance,

Teun Spaans 07:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Allium_sativum_plant.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Allium_sativum_plant.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH • talk   13:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Papaver aurantiacum[edit]

Guten Tag. Ich bitte für Entschuldigung. Die Seite Papaver aurantiacum hab'ich beigefügt (und vier Bilder dazu), und erst später bemerkt es existiert schon Papaver alpinum (Papaver alpinum subsp. rhaeticum). Es scheint die gleiche Planze zu sein. Oder ?
I hope it is not too much of a mess and you are able to put it into order! Thank you. -- MHM-com 09:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, done. Moved the pictures (nice ones) and made a redirect. mfg --Tigerente 14:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. -- MHM-com 20:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:UnknownLepidoptera02.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:UnknownLepidoptera01.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Tigerente!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Hervorragende Fotos, bin begeistert! Cerana (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Tolles Foto das mit den Kreuzottern - mein Kompliment! Fichtenspargel (talk) 12:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.

(Konservenansprache) Ist ja ein Witz, Tigerente ohne autopatrol. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kempsenkopf[edit]

Ich stoße gerade über den WP-Artikel zum Kempsenkopf auf dein Bild unter [1] und habe etwas gerätselt. Stutzig macht mich vor allem, dass die beiden Gipfel deutlich weiter als 100 m voneinander entfernt stehen und die Scharte dazwischen auch deutlich tiefer als 15 m ist. Kann es sein, dass du dich bei der Beschriftung etwas vertan hast? Wenn ich den im Bild dargestellten Gratverlauf mit den mir vorliegenden Topographischen Karten vergleiche, dann zeigt das Bild nicht den Kempsenkopf, sondern die Kamera steht auf dem Kempsenkopf und schaut über die Obere Jägerscharte zum Krapfbrachkopf (oben felsig) und Rettenzink (oben grün). Kannst du das mal prüfen? --Kreuzschnabel 11:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Servus, ja ich glaub du hast recht. Ich schaus mir am Abend im Archiv noch mal genau an. Danke lg --Tigerente (talk) 06:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Servus, stimmt. Die Jägerscharte ist direkt unterhalb. Rechts unbenannte Höhe 2735, links Krapfbachkopf. Ein Bild im meinem Archiv in der Gegenrichtung unmittelbar danach zeigt den Kempsenkopf. Danke --Tigerente (talk) 19:25, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Gut, dann packe ich die Zweifel an meinem Verstand wieder ein :) Wär’s dir möglich, besagtes Bild hochzuladen, das den Kempsenkopf zeigt? Wir haben nämlich keines auf Commons, soweit ich sehe. --Kreuzschnabel 20:27, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Servus, Da gibt's leider menschlichen Vordergrund :D lg --Tigerente (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angerkogel Totes Gebirge 20100330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice image, but to my eye it feels like it needs to be rotated clockwise two or three degrees (based on cloud spread and trees). --Bobulous 20:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done by the author. --Milseburg 14:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good scene, well exposed, sufficiently sharp at full screen. --Bobulous 20:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:42, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyrsbergerreith Totes Gebirge 20200920a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steirischer Ölkürbis Feld Allhaming 20200911b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großes Tragl Gipfelkreuz Totes Gebirge 20200706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aquarium Weyregg 20210605b.jpg[edit]

Hallo Tigerente! Das Bild ist aktuell in der Wettbewerbskategorie für Gemeingüter (Category:Media from WikiDaheim 2021 in Austria/Commons) einsortiert. Würde meiner Meinung nach aber besser in Category:Media from WikiDaheim 2021 in Austria/Public art passen, wo nicht mehr nur die irgendwo aufgelisteten Kunstwerke zählen, sondern jegliche Kunst im öffentlichen Raum. Vielleicht magst Du es ja umsortieren? Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 12:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Haeferl, ja da hast du recht. Erledigt. lg --Tigerente (talk) 12:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sölden geht wieder auf wikidaheim.at[edit]

Danke fürs Feedback! Offenbar hat da das Verschieben des Artikels auf de.wikipedia zu Problemen geführt :-/ LG, Braveheart (talk) 12:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2021 - Gratulation![edit]

Hallo Tigerente,
danke für deine Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation! Du hast gleich mit mehreren Bildern eine Reihe von Platzierungen erreicht. Wir gratulieren also

Du erhältst in Kürze von uns noch eine Mail mit den genaueren Infos zu den Preisen. Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 16:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Werner, Danke es freut mich. Mit dem 2. Platz hab ich überhaupt nicht gerechnet :) lg --Tigerente (talk) 17:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Media from WikiDaheim 2022 in Austria not for prejury[edit]

leider zu klein

Hallo Tigerente! Da das Bild weniger als 2 Megapixel hat (Wettbewerbsbedingungen), verschiebe ich es in die Category:Media from WikiDaheim 2022 in Austria not for prejury. Zugleich aber auch die Bitte, Deine Bilder selbst vorzusortieren und nur die besten der Vorjury vorzulegen - dafür ist die Cat vor allem da. Das dient der Entlastung der Vorjury, die ja auch aus Freiwilligen besteht und die jedes Jahr tausende Bilder bewerten. Wenn alle Viel-Uploader das beherzigen würden, würde das allen Mitgliedern der Vorjury viel Zeit sparen. Ich habe seit zehn Jahren keine Zeit für Herbstaufnahmen, weil ich sonst mit dem Bewerten nicht fertig werde. Besonders schön wäre es natürlich, wenn Du dich auch selbst an der Vorjury beteiligst. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 13:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Servus, Erledigt. Es sind weniger als 10 Bilder übriggeblieben. Betrifft das nur WikiDaheim oder auch WLE? lg Tigerente (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weniger als zehn?! Also sooo aussortieren brauchst Du auch wieder nicht. ;-) Ich hab meine noch nie gezählt, aber ich schätze, ich gebe immer so zwischen einem und zwei Drittel meiner Bilder in die Cat, also durchschnittlich so ca. die Hälfte. Aber das soll kein Richtwert sein, kann natürlich jeder halten, wie er will. Danke jedenfalls und liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 17:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentianella aspera Hochanger 20210821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lacke Goldbachtal Totes Gebirge 20220627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seelein Kirchfeld Totes Gebirge 20220627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarzensee Totes Gebirge 20210910a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 11:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirndln Hoher Dachstein 20070716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzbergwerk Altaussee Stollen 20220924a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temlberg Totes Gebirge 20220722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carlina acaulis Totes Gebirge 20210910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:11, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim: Gratulation[edit]

Hallo Tigerente,
danke für deine Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation! Du hast damit einige Platzierungen erreicht und wir gratulieren also

Du erhältst in Kürze von uns noch eine Mail mit den genaueren Infos zu den Preisen. Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, –Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 11:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Lichtsäule Wels Holzschnitt 1873.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Lichtsäule Wels Holzschnitt 1873.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lichtsäule Wels Holzschnitt 1873.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2023 - Gratulation![edit]

Hallo Tigerente,
danke für deine Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation! Du hast damit einige Platzierungen erreicht und wir gratulieren also

Du erhältst in Kürze von uns noch eine Mail mit den genaueren Infos zu den Preisen. Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 08:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Annemarie, danke es freut mich sehr. lg --Tigerente (talk) 09:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tigerente&oldid=825496020"