User talk:Theklan/2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Piarres Xarriton.webm. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 11:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Joxe Agirre.webm. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 11:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:(TUTORIALA) Zer igo daiteke Wikimedia Commonsera-.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 02:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olerkijak.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KRLS (talk) 18:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ja existia File:Olerkijak (1919).djvu.--KRLS (talk) 18:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tontorraundi (Altsasu) dermioa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Saint-Nicolas et tour de la Chaîne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I trust the warm tone, not so bad. But I don´t like the vignette. Maybee you will change it? I can imagine it will not like so antiquated--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: done!-Theklan 17:37, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Yann 13:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Theklan, he creado todas las subcategorías por tag que hay en las imágenes de esta categoría. Espero no haber roto nada. Un saludo --Discasto talk 17:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: Bueno, la mayoría estarían mejor subcategorizadas. Me pongo a ello. -Theklan (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Eguzkiaren ezaugarriak.svg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sailkatutako ondarea[edit]

Egun on Theklan, zer moduz? Aguraingo ondarea osatzen ari naiz pixka bat. Irailean sumatu nuen, baina orain susmoa baino gehiago ez ote den: badirudi zenbakiekin nahastea dagoela batzuetan (edo nik ez dakit zer irizpiderekin aukeratu dituzten eraikin batzuk). Herria ondo ezagutzen dut, itxuraz berriak eta inongo interesik ez duten eraikin sailkatuen aldamenean, beste interesgarri batzuk ez dira sailkatuta agertzen, adibidez, hau, baina bai aldamenekoa, zatarra ez, baina interes gutxiagokoa. Antzera, "Mayor 31" etxea... Bestalde, Uriarte jauregia, adibidez, ez da Uriarte jauregia EJren zerrendan agertzen eta, beraz, identifikatzeko zaila da. Hori haien kontu bat da, baina ez dakit zenbateraino ondo dagoen zerrenda hori. Iñaki LL (talk) 09:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Iñaki LL: Agian gertatzen dena da zenbakiak aldatu direla azken aldiz joan zirenetik. Argazkiak daude EJren zerrendan, agian pista bat izan daiteke. -Theklan (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Goiko akatsetan oinarrituz, ez dut segurtasun handirik zerrenden erabateko zuzentasunari buruz. Ohartu dira, itxura denez, zenbaki batzuk behintzat aldatu direla, baina beharbada ez dute lan sistematikoa egin. Uriarte jauregia ere, Aguraingo zerrendan agertzen dena, ez da EJren zerrendan agertzen, izen horrekin bederen. Iñaki LL (talk) 10:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Iñaki LL: Hemen dago-Theklan (talk) 10:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ai la ostia... Ba ez dit dena kargartu... (behin baino gehiagotan), argi dago. Orain bai, eskerrik asko! Iñaki LL (talk) 11:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Alaia Martin Miren Amurizari begira.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Alaia Martin Miren Amurizari begira.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 18:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Pio1917.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:01, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2018[edit]

Dear Theklan,

Thank you a lot for your participation to the 2018 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments.

At the occasion of the European year of cultural heritage, the WLM french team would be very glad to get your testimony about those following questions.

  1. Why did you participate in the French contest?
  2. On what occasion did you take your photographs?
  3. Did you participate in other WLM competitions for this 2018 edition?
  4. What do you think of the French WLM contest?

We would like to send your answer to journalists and put it on our social network in order to valorize your participation to the French WLM contest.
Will you accept that your text will be published on Internet and in any newspaper which will be interested?

Thank you again for your participation
For the french team of WLM 2018
ArkéoTopia (talk) 20:08, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]