User talk:Terragio67/Archive/2023

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden crucifix (XVI sec) - Chiesa San Giovanni Battista - Gradara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAB and Wikimedia Marche - Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 Awards - Castle of Gradara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Category needs a fixing. --Ermell 23:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC) THX for tour review. The event is part of the 2022 contest, but It was postponed the 7th of january 2023. Do you suggest to fix the cat in "Wikimedian of Italy in 2022"? --Terragio67 06:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Wikimedians of Italy in 2023 should be in a category as well. --Ermell 09:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Understood: At the Moment I added the category father "Wikimedians of Italy per year" .... By the way, Thanks! --Terragio67 15:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Yep, but... please don't remove the Category:Wiki Loves Marche 2022 award ceremony --Galessandroni 16:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC) Yes, it's fine. --Terragio67 05:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden crucifix (details) Chiesa di San Giovanni Battista - Gradara - Marche (Italy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castello Sforzesco (Milan) - Torrione di Santo Spirito.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Ok now : look at the modifications of the scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

  I see... thanks. Terragio67 (talk) 14:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Single house on the top of the Raggiolo Village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quality is fine for me. --Radomianin 21:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello Sforzesco (Milan) - Torrione del Carmine - East tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 12:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocchetta di Piazza - sec. MCDLXVI - (Cesena).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden crucifix XVI sec - Chiesa San Giovanni Battista - Gradara Marche Italy (Image Fusion Process).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castello Sforzesco (Milan) - Torrione del Carmine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sempervivum tectorum (cultivated).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porta Fiume (Cesena).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo del Ridotto (Cesena) - Large view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiki Loves Marche 2022 - MAB and Wikimedia Marche organizers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:10, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 has started, Join us!

Hello Terragio67/Archive/2023,

Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore International Team!

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How to Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February to 31 March 2023. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading ! To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Common. Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

• 1st prize: 500 USD
• 2nd prize: 400 USD
• 3rd prize: 300 USD
• Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD Each
• Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 150 USD & 150 USD
• Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 100 USD, Second prize: 50 USD
• Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
• Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in form of gift card or voucher format only)

You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group

Warm regards,

Rockpeterson

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity scene - Sant Agata Feltria (Rimini).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Question about the current FPC of the Uffizi Gallery

Hello Terragio67, you have mentioned here that you have been to this place several times. I could find proper categories (ok, with some help sometimes :) ) to all pictures I uploaded from this awesome museum, with one exception, this image. Do you have a clue where is it exactly so that I can create a category for this (I don't think that we have other images on Commons of this ceiling)? I also looked in the internet but didn't find anything. Grazie mile! Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Diego, it is the Sala della Niobe's ceiling made in 1780 - Neoclassic architecture commissioned by Leopold II, a Holy Roman Emperor. When he was the Grand Duke of Tuscany, ha was also the patron of the arts in Florence.

Sala della Niobe can be translated in Room of the Niobids

Congratulations again for the FPC image! Terragio67 (talk) 01:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

@Diego Delso On the Uffizi.it official web site there are info about the Niobe room's authors. Probably you was looking for it... Terragio67 (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Wow, there you are, thank you so much! I will update the description and look for suitable categories (otherwise I will create one). Btw, I was thinking that the Torre Guaita picture is pretty nice and probably a good candidate for FP. Poco a poco (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

May I ask you for a real challenge? You surely know the Pitti Palace inside out, too. Could you tell me where is this awesome ceiling located? My last question, I promise :) Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

The Palazzo Pitti has over 500 rooms, some of them are well known for their ceiling showing stunning frescoes. The image you linked above, doesn't ring a bell, I am afraid I can't help you. Terragio67 (talk) 07:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria Assunta (Cervia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Guaita Tower - Città di San Marino.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It's in order; look at the changes in the syntax of your proposal. The caption of the image must contain the geocoding.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
  
•  Comment I have seen and noticed the changes in the syntax of my proposal, thank you. Then, I added the information required to the Diego Delso's image. It was an easy task, because I published a similar photo exactly from the same location. --Terragio67 (talk) 08:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guaita Tower - San Marino - view from Salita alla Cesta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 19:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain in the Garden of Liburni - San Marino (1962).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --FlocciNivis 16:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clocktower - Filarete tower (Milan).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statua di San Giovanni - Duomo di Cesena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version, 2pp, crop & white balance --Terragio67 18:09, 11 February 2023 (UTC) New version uploaded. --Terragio67 19:49, 17 February 2023 (UTC) I think you're over-sharpening, can you back off on that a bit? Also bring up the shadows a bit more. The perspective correction looks good in the latest versions, but a bit curved on the right, are you using profile corrections? --Mike Peel 21:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC) This statue is really a difficult object, it never see sun rays directly. I tried to take advantage of the rebound sunlight from a side building, but the result is barely acceptable. This is why (rightly) you ask me to bring up the shadows a bit more. Anyway, thanks for your time, this night i'll try some non destructive tweaks... --Terragio67 13:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC) New version uploaded. --Terragio67 17:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Thanks, it looks much better now! --Mike Peel 09:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portone della Chiesa del Suffragio (MDCLXXXIX) - Cesena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Pubblico - View from place in front of Galleria arte moderna e contemporanea - San Marino (2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portone del Palazzo Rubini Vesin - Gradara Marche (Italy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Very good image. But can you tell where exactly this is? --Augustgeyler 22:40, 16 March 2023 (UTC) Reply: Sure, Gradara is a well-preserved medieval town. I'v just added object and camera location. --Terragio67 04:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 10:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darsena salt storehouse - Cervia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 23:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purple tulip - Emilia Romagna, Italy (March 2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:32, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Tulipa 'Purple Dream' (Lily-Flowered Tulip), Spring flower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Darsena salt storehouse - Cervia, Emilia Romagna, Italy..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Famberhorst (talk) 17:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Categorie con nome errato

Ciao, ho visto che hai creato un paio di categorie con il nome sbagliato. Se ti capita di fare un errore simile, dopo aver creato la categoria col nome corretto e svuotato di ogni file quella sbagliata, metti per favore in quest'ultima il template {{Bad name}} compilato col nome della categoria corretta. In questo modo passerà un amministratore a cancellarla, atrimenti rimarrà lì per chissà quanto. Ti segnalo anche che "Emilia-Romagna" va scritto col trattino, anche perché altrimenti ci sono molti template che non funzionano correttamente e non la riconoscono come una regione italiana. Ciao! --Phyrexian ɸ 14:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulipa Juliette - April 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tulipa 'Juliette' - (cultivars).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulipa double late (yellow).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version uploaded from RAW, due to a previous post-process mistake. --Terragio67 12:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ducati 955 Panigale V2 (IMG 9851).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support this is so good! --Modern primat 21:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Navinsingh133 22:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ducati 955 Panigale V2 (IMG 9845).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Navinsingh133 22:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamborghini Huracan Super Trofeo Evo (IMG 9867).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Spots should be removed --Ermell 21:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)  Done : New version uploaded. Thanks to @Ermell --Terragio67 14:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamborghini Huracan Super Trofeo Evo (IMG 9866).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Spots in the sky should be removed. --Ermell 22:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC) Reply: Thanks, I'll do as soon as possible. --Terragio67 14:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Done : New version uploaded. Thanks... --Terragio67 19:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Cesenatico skyscraper seen from lungomare levante heading NW.jpg

And also:

• File:Cesenatico skyscraper seen from lungomare levante.jpg
• File:Cesenatico skyscraper seen from piazza andrea costa heading E.jpg
• File:Cesenatico skyscraper seen from piazza andrea costa heading east 2.jpg
• File:Cesenatico skyscraper seen from the beach.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The lighthouse - Cervia (Ravenna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (another tower of pisa, wow) --Grunpfnul 17:52, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

-

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darsena warehouse - Cervia (Ravenna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana del Masini - Cesena (04-06-2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana Masini (2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Uploaded a new version. White balance corrected, faithful img (less sharpened). --Terragio67 05:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 96 - Delahaye 135 CS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 22:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cervia lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
  Indeed...
  I added object and camera locations in summary. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Piazza del Popolo di notte (dettagli) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 19:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Piazza del Popolo di notte (dettagli).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 167 - Fiat 500 (1949).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Cool. --Stepro 20:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 271 - Jaguar XK120 OTS Roadster (1952).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 105 - Fiat 1100 (508 C) Sport Speciale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harley Davidson FAT BOY 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 265 - MG TF 1250 (1953).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023- Car number 224 - Fiat 500 C Belvedere (1952).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version: Corrections on an underexposed image. --Terragio67 12:32, 25 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 96 - Delahaye 135 CS (right side).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 16:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harley Davidson - Fat Boy 114 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Large stainless steel sphere in water - Megalò shopping center at Chieti (Italy).jpg

File:Large stainless steel sphere in water - Megalò shopping center at Chieti (Italy).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 85 - Aston Martin Le Mans (1934).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version: Corrections on an underexposed image. --Terragio67 12:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC) New ver. recovered from RAW file. --Terragio67 13:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)  Comment I'd support this image with a narrower crop (see my proposal in the file). This would concentrate the view on that beautiful vintage car, rather than on the more or less useless surroundings. --Palauenc05 07:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC) @Palauenc05:  Done & thanks, seems to be better now... --Gio Terra 13:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, is it you?

here? In that case, could you please log in and sign again, thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

@Poco a poco

Yes,

I'm going to fix the signature.

Terragio67 is Gio Terra... Terragio67 (talk) 03:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 158 - OSFA Faccioli FIAT 750 S (1948).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 237 - SIATA DAINA GRAN SPORT Stabilimenti Farina (1952).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --CherryX 18:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline di Cervia (june 2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wonderful mood, but sensor dust is visible --Grunpfnul 18:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC) Reply:  Done Thanks to @Grunpfnul ... I removed several spots...(caused by rain). --Terragio67 21:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 07:08, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car 265 - MG TF 1250 (1953).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Harley Davidson FAT BOY 114.jpg

Ciao, Gio, ho visto i tuoi immagini and in this image I see you used quite a fast shutter speed 1/250th of a second when the object was still and used a small aperture of f/4.5, what's the reason for this choice? Grazie, 多多123 19:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Harley Davidson FAT BOY 114

It was an experiment, the wall behind was quite close to the Harley Davidson (8 metres) and I desired to have background and foreground blurred in order to give attention and importance to the bike. I was 16 metres from the wall and the Harley Davidson was in the middle. I forced the aperture to f/4.5 in order to reduce DOF and according to the ambience and relative light reflected from the metallic chrome (bracketed / focused), the automatic calculation from my DSLR camera was 1/250th.

Kind regards. Terragio67 (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upper view of the Masini fountain - Cesena - Italy (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 17:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 220 - ASTON MARTIN DB 2 slash 4 DROPHEAD COUPÉ (1952).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 102 - BMW 328 (1937).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 224 (2) - Aston Martin 2 Litre Speed (1937).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pier Luigi Bersani - Cesena - 23 luglio 2023 (IMG 2720).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - Car number 227 - LANCIA APPIA (1952).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version uploaded --Terragio67 06:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC) Good quality. Please add a CAT for the car model. --Tagooty 00:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)  Done I added two categories. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2023 - car 255 - Ferrari 250 mm Berlinetta Pinin Farina (1953).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yesterday, something went wrong with my signature. I confirm this nomination. --Terragio67 17:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)  Support May be the lights are a little bit blurred, but the picture is overall ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 06:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

English caption in Cesenatico - Porto Canale (2023)

Cesenatico - Porto Canale (2023)

Hello Terragio67:

This image is very good, especially the subtle lighting colors.

However, your current English caption, while informative, seems too wordy to work as a caption.

Suggest all of it be moved down into the image description for future reference.

A shorter “Porto Canale Leonardesco, Italy with bragozzo fishing vessels” might work better as a caption. GRDN711 (talk) 15:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello Gordon and thanks for your advice. Obviously I'm inexperienced and I didn't understand the importance of being concise when writing in the captions, which have just been changed. Terragio67 (talk) 17:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pier Luigi Bersani – Italian politician and pundit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bragozzo - Cesenatico (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right moment to make a beautiful photo, unfortunately the reflection is just not quite complete --Michielverbeek 18:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesenatico - Porto Canale (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality; and beautiful. --Tsui 20:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Thanks, I would just let you know that I enlightened the image a little bit. --Terragio67 21:58, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Marino - Concattedrale (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not 100% sure about the perspective correction (the street lamp) and the light (missing on the portal), but overall a very good composition and good quality. --Tsui 20:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cesenatico - Porto Canale (2023).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cesenatico - Porto Canale (2023).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arco di Papa Clemente 14. (Santarcangelo di Romagna).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 è iniziato: partecipa anche tu!

Buongiorno Terragio67,

ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Anche quest’anno torna Wiki Loves Monuments: da oggi al 30 settembre puoi partecipare caricando le tue foto per contribuire a illustrare il patrimonio culturale italiano: vai sul sito wikilovesmonuments.it e scopri come fare!

Oltre ai 20.000 monumenti già in concorso, quest’anno si aggiungono più di 60.000 edifici religiosi, tema centrale di quest’edizione. Prendi la tua macchina fotografica, o il tuo smartphone, e individua i monumenti in concorso tramite la nuova web-app – disponibile sia da mobile che desktop – app.wikilovesmonuments.it, da cui potrai anche caricare direttamente i tuoi scatti. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite.

A livello nazionale verranno premiate le dieci migliori fotografie: cinque per gli edifici religiosi e cinque per le altre categorie di monumenti; queste immagini parteciperanno anche alla fase internazionale del concorso. Non sono ammesse immagini con watermark o cornici, né fotografie eccessivamente elaborate in postproduzione. Qui puoi consultare Il regolamento completo e per qualsiasi dubbio puoi scrivere a contatti@wikilovesmonuments.it.

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento! --Ysogo(talk) 05:0, 1 September 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porto Canale Leonardesco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorizia - Duomo di Gorizia - 2023-09-03 21-21-16 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorizia - Duomo di Gorizia - 2023-09-03 21-16-12 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Interno - 2023-09-05 01-23-50 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesenatico - Chiesa di San Giacomo Apostolo - (Porto Canale Leonardesco) 2023-09-06 17-57-26 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - Palazzo Apostolico - Colonnato (Donato Bramante) 2023-09-06 22-41-35 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - 2023-09-06 22-38-04 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:25, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - Piazza della Madonna - 2023-09-06 23-18-37 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - Bassorilievo XV secolo - 2023-09-06 23-10-19 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gradara - Chiesa di San Giovanni Battista - Altare - Soffitto - 2023-09-06 23-37-18 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - Francesco di Bernardone a cavallo 2023-09-08 15-15-49 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 22:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - 2023-09-06 00-04-25 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Giacomo Apostolo and historic boats in the Porto Leonardesco..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope The more precise the scope, the less dispute there is.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - Cappella Tedesca - 2023-09-10 13-30-57 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fara Filiorum Petri - Comune di Fara Filiorum Petri - Vicolo del centro storico - 2023-09-09 21-00-10 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - Esterno - 2023-09-09 21-10-40 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Facciata - 2023-09-09 21-11-53 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - 2023-09-09 21-13-50 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbey of Saint Peter (Assisi) - 14th-century wooden crucifix..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiusi della Verna - Santuario della Verna - dettagli - 2023-09-11 07-24-47 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiusi della Verna - Santuario della Verna - dettagli - 2023-09-11 07-22-18 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiusi della Verna - Santuario della Verna - Campanile - 2023-09-11 07-20-34 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 14:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - 2023-09-08 15-12-22 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiusi della Verna - Santuario della Verna - 2023-09-10 22-07-39 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Liridon 19:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - Rosone - 2023-09-13 21-43-51 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milano - Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II - dettaglio - 2023-09-13 21-36-46 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesenatico - Museo della Marineria di Cesenatico - Imbarcazioni storiche - (2) - 2023-09-13 21-25-34 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 20:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - (2) - 2023-09-13 21-21-45 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 23:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiusi della Verna - Santuario della Verna - Campanile - 2023-09-11 07-18-18 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiusi della Verna - Santuario della Verna - 2023-09-10 22-09-04 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiusi della Verna - Santuario della Verna - 2023-09-10 22-05-39 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - 2023-09-15 05-56-28 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - Francesco di Bernardone statue - 2023-09-15 05-47-53 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - 2023-09-15 05-39-47 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tintagel Castle - Shop and facilities.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Tintagel Castle - Cornwall - England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Palazzo del Ridotto - Campanile - 2023-09-14 06-41-57 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Palazzo del Ridotto - 2023-09-14 06-40-50 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Palazzo del Ridotto - Statua di Pio VI (2) - 2023-09-14 06-38-27 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Palazzo del Ridotto - Statua di Pio VI - 2023-09-14 06-36-37 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Campanile del Duomo visto da via Fantaguzzi - 2023-09-14 06-33-14 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milano - Duomo di Milano - Monumento a Vittorio Emanuele II - Museo del Novecento - 2023-09-12 18-18-40 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesenatico - Comune di Cesenatico - Trabucco sul porto canale - 2023-09-16 06-14-23 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - Sisto V - 2023-09-16 06-23-08 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milano - Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II - 2023-09-16 21-58-09 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Iketsi 04:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - 2023-09-08 15-15-02 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Cesenatico - Porto Canale (2023).jpg

Ma porca la pupazza!

Immagini così belle le devi caricarle per Wiki Loves Marche, ormai dovresti saperlo!

E poi hai una pagina di discussione da far schiattare d'invidia chiunque, non ci si comporta così, uffa.

Adesso carico su Instagram il tuo Loreto in bianco e nero.

E niente, questo è il mio modo cretino per dirti bravo. A presto,
Giacomo Alessandroni ^{What's up!} 14:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Mi ha fatto davvero molto piacere risentirti...

Sono in un momento di 'grazia fotografica' credo che anche Wikimedia Umbria ne abbia beneficiatoː

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

Comunque, Loreto resta la mia palestra fotografica e il mio posto del cuore, per questo motivo presento tante foto di questo santo luogo dove sono cresciuti i miei figli, ma... (nemo propheta in patria est.)

a presto,

Gio Terra (Terragio67) Terragio67 (talk) 16:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ravenna - Museo dantesco - Antico chiostro Francescano - 2023-09-17 22-38-15 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ravenna - Museo dantesco - Dante presenta Giotto a Guido da Polenta - 2023-09-17 22-40-51 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 04:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Visto dalla Rocchetta di Piazza (N) - 2023-09-17 22-46-41 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - Dettagli (parte superiore) - 2023-09-08 15-17-31 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments noisy sky and very dark madonna, fixable? --Virtual-Pano 10:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC) Maybe... I'll try ASAP --Terragio67 20:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC) @Virtual-Pano Done, new version uploaded. Clear the cache, please... and by the way thanks. --Terragio67 20:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - San Cristoforo, San Rocco e San Sebastiano - Lorenzo Lotto (1532 - 1534 ) - 2023-09-18 12-42-48 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Vista dalla Rocchetta di Piazza (NE) - 2023-09-17 22-48-30 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laquearius 15:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - 2023-09-16 16-21-38 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 14:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Centro storico, dettagli - 2023-09-19 21-50-44 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Centro storico, dettagli - 2023-09-19 21-52-14 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Centro storico, dettagli - 2023-09-19 21-53-38 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - Ingresso del Museo Pontificio Santa Casa - 2023-09-17 22-43-11 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 10:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiusi della Verna - Santuario della Verna - 2023-09-10 22-06-45 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiusi della Verna - Santuario della Verna - 2023-09-10 22-01-51 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Giovanni Mochi - Dante introducing Giotto to Guido da Polenta..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Christopher with Saint Roch and Saint Sabastian by Lorenzo Lotto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo del Ridotto (Cesena) - Pio VI Statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
• Done, thanks... --Terragio67 (talk) 12:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Comune di Assisi - Piazza inferiore di San Francesco - 2023-09-22 23-21-26 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Rocchetta di Piazza e Loggetta Veneziana - (Golden hours) - 2023-09-22 22-23-44 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Interno - 2023-09-22 19-30-49 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Centro Storico (1) - 2023-09-21 22-58-02 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Piazzale Pio VII - Piccolo Chiostro - 2023-09-21 23-02-12 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pescara - Comune di Pescara - Porto canale - 2023-09-23 08-17-22 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - Chiesa di San Giacomo - 2023-09-22 20-29-32 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 11:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Religious paintings by Francesco Francia Presentation of Jesus in the temple and purification of the Virgin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Should "purification of the Virgin" be in the title of the painting? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Replyː
Hi ̊@Charlesjsharp, in this particular case it is normally not wrong to shorten the title, but from a formal point of view you are right. I also asked to change the title for a second reason: the date of execution of the painting in the title was wrong. Since I don't have File/Mover rights, I'm currently waiting for the fix. Thanks as always. Terragio67 (talk) 11:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Support OK Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milano - Torre del Filarete - 2023-09-23 21-06-02 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Larryasou 18:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castello Sforzesco (Milan) - Filarete Tower - external view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Centro storico, dettagli - 2023-09-19 21-54-51 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 06:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assisi - Basilica di San Francesco - - Rosone centrale - 2023-09-24 23-11-06 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please use proper categorization before nominating for QI --MB-one 13:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC) ReplyːDone, thanks. --Terragio67 00:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milano - Castello Sforzesco - Plaque Rocchetta - 2023-09-24 23-09-08 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Pinacoteca comunale di Cesena - Presentazione di Gesù al tempio e purificazione della Vergine (1510-13) - Francesco Francia - 2023-09-20 14-43-40 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (can you add also a category about the theme of the painting?). --C messier 18:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Centro storico, dettagli - 2023-09-19 21-48-18 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Quality images shall be properly categorized. --F. Riedelio 11:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC) @F. Riedelio - Thx 4 your review. Removing the generic category Cesena, I added the following category Ex Monastero delle Clarisse (Cesena) --Terragio67 00:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)  Answered @Terragio67 - If it is a cultural monument, it should be classified under the category "Cultural heritage monuments in Cesena" @F. Riedelio - Thx again, I added the Cat Palaces in Cesena as the Cultural Heritage Monuments Cat is in the hidden category.--Terragio67 00:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreto - Basilica della Santa Casa di Loreto - Veduta della piazza - 2023-09-27 15-43-48 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Grazie per aver partecipato a WikiLovesMonuments 2023 - Italia

_{(English version available here)}

Ciao Terragio67, grazie per aver partecipato all’edizione italiana di Wiki Loves Monuments 2023!

È stato un anno da record, con oltre 52.000 immagini caricate su Wikimedia Commons, di cui già 2.800 utilizzate sui progetti Wikimedia (numero destinato ad aumentare). Stiamo davvero documentando il patrimonio culturale italiano insieme!

In attesa del risultato dei lavori di selezione delle fotografie da parte delle giurie, ti chiediamo di dedicarci pochi minuti del tuo tempo per rispondere a un breve questionario (anonimo), che ci aiuterà a fare ancora meglio il prossimo anno: link al sondaggio sul limesurvey di Wikimedia Italia

Grazie ancora. --Ysogo(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Centro Storico (3) - 2023-09-21 23-00-51 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is OK but can you provide more info about the tower and more specific categories? --C messier 18:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Replyː Added caption, description and geo-location. Thx 4 the review. --Terragio67 17:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Support Good quality. --C messier 17:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Comune di Cesena - Centro Storico (2) - 2023-09-21 22-59-57 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality images shall be properly categorized (Cultural heritage monuments in Cesena‎). --F. Riedelio 13:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC) There are a lot of CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 14:27, 1 October 2023 (UTC) Replyː Added CATs , descriptions and notes, reduced CAs. Thx 4 yours review. --Terragio67 17:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)  Good Quality now. --F. Riedelio 10:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pescara - Cattedrale di San Cetteo - 2023-09-27 15-11-27 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duomo di Cesena - Crocifisso ligneo - HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 21:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Duomo di Cesena - Crocifisso - 2023-10-12 21-00-00 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barras Nose and Merlin's Cave, Tintagel, England - view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Duomo di Cesena - Crocifisso - 2023-10-01 07-30-14 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Copenhagen Central Post building and Railways station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cesena - Duomo di Cesena - Crocifisso - 2023-10-12 21-00-00 002.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cesena - Duomo di Cesena - Crocifisso - 2023-10-01 07-30-14 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piazza Inferiore di San Francesco - (Assisi, Italy) view from north..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and very used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nova Gorica train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic floating boats (Cesenatico)ː Bragozzo and Trabaccolo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cesenatico - Canal port - Fishing house (Trabucco) 2023-08-15.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cesenatico - Canal port - Fishing house (Trabucco) 20230815.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesena - Duomo di Cesena - Crocifisso - (dettagli).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbazia di Santa Maria del Monte - Interno - Cesena (Italy) HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama - Colle Garampo - Cesena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingresso della Rocca di Bertinoro, Emilia-Romagna, Italy (nov 2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbazia di Santa Maria del Monte - Abbey church - Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Interior is too broad a scope. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbazia di Santa Maria del Monte - Abbey church - Dome - Details.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guaita Fortress and San Marino (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guaita fortress and the City of San Marino (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guaita Fortress - San Marino, 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 20:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Merry Christmas to you tooǃǃǃ I take advantage of this conversation to thank you for your precious support on commons, not just for me... Terragio67 (talk) 08:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2024! -- Radomianin (talk) 11:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortress of Guaita on Titan mount - San Marino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays and best wishes!

Happy holidays! Merry christmas! Best wishes for 2024! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too! Your wishes are particularly welcome and somehow prescient because I will be in Geneva to celebrate the New Year. Terragio67 (talk) 08:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!

✴ Happy Holidays, Terragio67 ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 20:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

… And please let me repeat what I wrote on your last FP candidate, File:Fortress of Guaita on Titan mount - San Marino.jpg: There are things regarding quality which can be discussed …, but overall the quality seems decent and the view is spectacular. Maybe take a second look at some details, e.g. at the sharpening/contrast/clarity of the castle (IMHO a bit too strong), but we should give this great photo another chance. I would nominate it, if you allow me, however I have no time in the next days, so this would have to wait until the holidays are over. What do you think? In any case, please continue your good work and all the best, --Aristeas (talk) 20:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Good morning Aristeas, it is always a great pleasure to receive messages from you. In this period I go through a moment of pause and reflection in which I prefer to be with my loved ones, especially my children, who I don't always see for work reasons. Consequently, I tend to put the right amount of effort into my work now and the least amount of effort into my hobbies. I won't hide from you that I would be proud to receive help and advice from you because you have experience to spare... Regarding the "Fortress Guaita on Titan mount" I think it will be necessary to rework the first file uploaded (a little bit bluish, with haze), because I definitely overdid it with post-production tools. I strongly believe I will return to San Marino again in spring to take new photos, the advantage will be to take, for sure, a good and healthy breath of fresh air. I wish you happy holidays from the bottom of my heart. Terragio67 (talk) 08:08, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Toscana

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana L'edizione 2023 di Wiki Loves Monuments si è conclusa. Lo scorso anno non avevamo segnalato l'inizio del concorso perché abbiamo avuto delle metriche di adesione più alte rispetto agli ultimi anni, quindi incentivare il caricamento sarebbe stato controproducente per i partecipanti più occasionali. Anche quest'anno l'adesione è stata alta (anzi nettamente più alta), probabilmente perché c'erano molte foto di chiese (la novità di quest'anno) negli archivi dei partecipanti storici e per questo non è stato inviato un messaggio durante settembre, mantenendo la strategia di massimizzare la promozione durante gli anni di minore partecipazione. I finalisti son stati nel frattempo selezionati e annunciati. Qui troverete il riepiligo con i vincitori. Continuate a seguire i nostri canali social per ulteriori informazioni riguardanti la cerimonia di premiazione, che avrà luogo a Piombino nei prossimi mesi. Tutti i semifinalisti sono cordialmente invitati a partecipare. per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista Per informazioni: toscanawikimedia.it WikiToscana Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki toscanawiki Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2023 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2023 #WLM2023

Inviato da Alexmar983 usando MediaWiki message delivery