User talk:Sven Volkens

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sven Volkens!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chelydra-serpentina3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osterprozession4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Percussionshammer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I would expect from a studio shot to keep all the item in focus, but IMHO, it works as it is. Others may think differently. --C messier 09:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leopold-SMS-2018-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Red link needs fixing. --Ermell 06:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC) done --Sven Volkens 10:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chase and Status-SMS-2018-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO nearly good enough for QI. Noise is always a problem, but noise reduction could be a little bit better. The user category should have the User Category template and should be hidden. EXIF data would be nice. --XRay 05:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC) thanks for the hint, way better now & fixed & fixed. --Sven Volkens 10:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Acceptable. There is still noise, but at a concert it is still a problem. --XRay 15:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camo and Krooked-SMS-2018-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Noisy, but that's to be expected for a concert image with high ISO. Otherwise, I think it looks good. --Clpo13 16:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hino ACME Buses in Barbados.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Question Hi, thanks for the feedback. Would you please explain? How is "Buses on Barbados" to broad? "Yellow Buses" or "Bus in Motion" seems much to narrow to me? --Sven Volkens (talk) 09:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment For vehicles it is strongly recommended to give the exact type and orientation of the shot.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
• ----

Scope changed from Buses in Barbados to Hino ACME, manufacturer and model as suggested, thanks! --Sven Volkens (talk) 20:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Question I can support this. Considering this is a locally produced bus built usually on a unknown chassis (unknown to me) and asking for that level of detail is simply unnecessary, I'd consider this right. My only question is isn't ACME the builder and in that case Hino is the model and therefor shouldn't it be ACME Hino? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
• Hi, I wasn't sure either, but the CommonsCat for Hino Buses did it. --Sven Volkens (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I support what they say. Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sven Volkens - Verdun 03.JPG

And also:

• File:Sven Volkens - Verdun 07.JPG

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 21:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)