User talk:Spurzem/Archive 9

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hermann Lang in Mercedes-Benz W 125, Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
NSU scooters: NSU Prima III K, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Racecar drivers from the Netherlands: Dries van der Lof.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graham Hill in 1969, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:50, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tin toys: Tin Cock made by GKN.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Is this toy dated 1948? Charles (talk) 09:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I got it when I was five or six years old and that was about 70 years ago. I have no certification. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

In amazing condition. Does it still work? Charles (talk) 17:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Yes! I have tried it just now, and the cock still pecks really. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schuco Toys: Examico 4001, sideview.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tin toy vehicles: GAMA tractor (Post-war US Zone).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 20:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose This is not a well-formulated scope. Model no should be specified.
•  Comment You have asked me what is wrong Lothar Spurzem. This company made many tractors and collectors have to identify them. Yoy collectors use model numbers where they exist, or sometimes year of manufacture or specific description. Charles (talk) 09:32, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Look at the description. There you can see when the tractor was made. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

There was one like this sold on German eBay as 1930s. The seller could be wrong of ocurse. The driver is mssing from your image so does not truly represent the Gama toy tractor range which was always, I think, supplied with a driver. How can you be sure this example was made between 1950 and 1955? You must have access to specialist knowledge, so should share this with the community to make the images VI. This is particularly important as your image illustrates the Wikipedia article and states 1950s. Is it stamped? Charles (talk) 10:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I bought it when I was eight perhaps nine or ten years old and on the bottom of the tractor you can read „Made in Germany U. S. Zone“. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind, I have changed scope. Charles (talk) 17:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rumors (play): Final scene by Kolping-Theatergruppe Kärlich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This is not a well-formulated scope. Production should be specified.

My Scopes were recently criticised because they were too long and were too exact. Can one make it here sometime right to everybody? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I think this is representative enough of the play, as it is the final scene. The scope is good IMO, and it is the best. VI for me.--Jebulon (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tin toy trains: locomotive with clockwork made by Distler.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is not a well-formulated scope. Model no should be specified. Charles (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support The oppose is not signed. And the scope looks good for me. VI.--Jebulon (talk) 09:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus, Spurzem, and Jebulon: We should be precise in scope where the information is readily available. The scope here should be something like Tin toy trains Distler steam locomotive 40821 with tender 1921 Charles (talk) 12:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tin toy trains: locomotive with clock work made by HWN, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is not a well-formulated scope. Model no should be specified. Charles (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support The oppose vote is not signed, and the scope looks good for me. VI.--Jebulon (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Lothar Spurzem Jebulon The scope should be for model W.47 please Charles (talk) 12:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus: Charles (talk) 12:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jack Brabham in 1966, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joakim Bonnier, portrait 1966.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gerhard Mitter driving BMW F269, German Grand Prix, 1969.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Definitely VI if you change scope to Gerhard Mitter driving BMW F269, German Grand Prix, 1969. Charles (talk) 14:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

 Done I never know if a scope is too short or too long. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helmuth Koinigg with BMW Alpina, practice 6 h of Nürburgring 1974.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
McLaren M7C view from above (1971 Nürburgring).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jody Scheckter, face profile 1976.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Very strange angle. How would you compare its usefulness in online articles to File:Jody Scheckter during the 1979 Monaco Grand Prix.jpg, a smaller and probably poorer-quality file, but one that I think has more character? I'm leaning toward saying that's the most useful picture in scope, though I suppose it could be argued whether it's a portrait or not. -- Ikan Kekek ( talk) 04:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: As the image is used in more than 25 articles I thought it would be valuable. May be that I am wrong. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

I don't take number of articles in which a photo is used as proof of its being more useful. Please make an argument that compares the two photos themselves. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

I do not have to justify myself towards you because VI is not important enough for me. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

I wish you would take this seriously and give an argument. You probably think I'm being disrespectful to you. I'm not. I think this is indeed a useful scope, appreciate the nomination but question whether another photo might be more useful. I think you're showing disrespect for the entire project by not being willing to have a discussion other than one of statistics (how many Wikipedia articles use a photo). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

 Support For me the scope is OK. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Yes, the scope is fine, but I think the other photo, though poor-quality, is more useful as a portrait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Once more: I show here a profile picture and do not understand, why it should be useless. It seems to me as there were personally reasons to vote negative. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Why on Earth would you think I have any personal reason to vote to support or decline? I can't understand that at all. Where do you think these things up? And to say that I think another photo in scope is more useful is not to say this photo is useless. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Support, useful and unique in the nominated scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rolf Stommelen with Brabham BT30 Formula 2 in 1970.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:37, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rolf Stommelen, portrait 1972.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - Nice portrait, but you need to link to Category:Rolf Stommelen instead of Category:c, and since this is the best - and only - portrait of Rolf Strommelen on Commons, I don't think the year it was taken should be included in the scope, though I'm happy to listen to an argument for why it should be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

• I hope it's OK that I changed the status to discussed, just so that you can resolve these issues, after which I'll be happy to support, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

No! I don't understand neither the second category Rolf Stommelen within a category Rolf Stommelen nor your changing the status. But as I said: There are obviously personally reasons. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

What the hell is your problem, really? You are so damn prickly! My record is that I support some of your nominations - you never once gave me any credit for successfully arguing on FPC that multiple nominations of cars for FP are just as valid as multiple nominations of church interiors, for example, nor for ANY OTHER SUPPORT VOTE I EVER MADE FOR ANY OF YOUR PHOTOS - yet you take it personally any time I question any photo of yours in the slightest way. I've had about enough of this crap from you. DeFacto is right that technically, I'd have to oppose to make this a discussion, but I thought the idea behind not including the year was that a picture from 1972 would be hard to distinguish from one from 1971 or 1973. However, I understand DeFacto's argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment, I'm happy with the year in the scope as it leaves room for photos added of other years. (BTW, the VI instructions say to use "status=discussed" when there is at least one "Oppose" vote and one "Support" vote. So as there are only support votes I've changed it to "supported") -- DeFacto (talk). 17:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Whatever opinion one has, four-letter words should be omitted. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

• Hell, damn or crap? All are quite mild expletives, and though strictly speaking, four-letter words, so are the words "four" and "word". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

"Good", and "well".--Jebulon (talk) 17:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Problem in VI

Hi, your appointment :Braubach, Hotel Zum Weißen Schwanen, Brunnenstr. 4 (2016-04-29).JPG poses some problems; you have to mix the items. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Hallo, I see no problem. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dieter Quester, portrait 1973.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dieter Quester with BMW CSL (E9) at Nürburgring 1973.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bédélia vehicle from about 1910 in motion (side-view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Johnny Cecotto at Nürburgring, Südkehre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rolf Stommelen with Porsche 935 at Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgward Hansa 1800, side-view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glas Goggomobil, first model with rear-hinged doors, in motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinkel Kabine, Bj. 1957, innen (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW F5 Cabriolimousine, Armaturen, Bj. 1936 (Foto Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Ro 80, Bj. 76, Motor (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Enfield, Bj. 1919, 1000 ccm (2016-09-04).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TVR 3000 M, Bj. 1974 (2009-10-13) Seite (ret).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgward RS from 1954 driven by Fritz Jüttner.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rudge Ulster from 1938 in motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Ermell (talk) 21:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
FMR Tg500 in competition.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, Used and really rare. Nice Contribution. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opel P4, front right.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opel P4, front left.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opel P4, rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mercedes Grand Prix car from 1914 in motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Imperia 500 H Sport from 1929 in motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
   Oppose I would say other option on site is much more in focus. I would put that one. --Mile (talk) 11:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

@PetarM: I know no other image of this motorcycle in motion in the commons. Please let see me which one you mean. Further I thought this here is not FP but a forum for rare pictures. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Lothar Spurzem image which is under "Other versions" on this image, click image. --Mile (talk) 07:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

@PetarM: That's the same motorcycle but not in motion and seen from the left side. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Support, useful and unique in the scope of the bike being ridden. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
“Affection”, sculpture by Lucien Wercollier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Max von Schenkendorf, bronze bust from 2013 in the Rhine park Koblenz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renault 5 in competition, start on Nürburgring in 1985.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1973 1000km Nürburgring, introduction lap.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - Super! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1972 1000km Nürburgring, starting-grid.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:58, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferrari 500 F2, cockpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferrari 500 F2, engine (2,5 litre).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferrari 312 P coupé in motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferrari 250 Testa Rossa from 1958, rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferrari 250 Testa Rossa from 1958, cockpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best and only in scope, useful and used. --Basotxerri (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auto-Union Typ D from 1938/39, driven by Colin Crabbe in 1979.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Willy Mairesse driving Ferrari 250 P at Nürburgring 1963.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1963 1000km Nürburgring, unsuccessful Porsche of Phil Hill.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

-- -- DeFacto (talk). 19:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ludovico Scarfiotti driving Ferrari 275 P.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koblenz, Pegelbrunnen (2015-09-15 3841 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a small halo around the gold ball. but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean Guichet driving Ferrari 275 P2.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pegelbrunnen in Koblenz, marking the highest water level of the Rhine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

The one and only! --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kapuzinerkloster Koblenz, portal of the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

The only in scope. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organs in Landkreis Mayen-Koblenz, organ from 1994 in St. Mauritius (Mülheim-Kärlich).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, can you add geocoding please. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

 Done at 20:46 h -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support, useful and best in scope now. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organs in Landkreis Mayen-Koblenz, prospect of the organ from 1973 in St. Mauritius (Mülheim-Kärlich).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful, good quality, and best (only one) in that scope.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 05:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organs in Landkreis Mayen-Koblenz, organ in Maria Himmelfahrt (Mülheim-Kärlich).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. -- Ermell (talk) 20:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:00, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier - Dom, Portal Liebfrauenkirche, Tympanon (2017-05-30).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The circumference could have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kapuzinerkloster Koblenz, church outside from north-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reliefs of the nativity of Jesus Christ in Germany, Trierer Dom, about 1740.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romanesque tympanums in Rhineland-Palatinate, Trier, from cathedral to the Church of our Lady.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organ of Trier Cathedral, view from south-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Märklin products, sleeping-car No. 17530, gauge 32 mm ~ 1950.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment VI for sure, but questions on description. Many examples on the Internet (e.g. eBay), mostly describing this with number 17530 and saying pre-war - did they make these before and after the war? Charles (talk) 13:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: If I remember right I got this sleeping-car as a new one in the years about from 1950 to 1952. More I can not say. But why is this information important to judge whether the image is valuable or not? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

It's valuable for sure, but always good to get the scope spot on. I suspect, though I cannot be sure, that specialists/collectors would expect 17530 to be in scope. Charles (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

We could also exaggerate it. Don't you think so too? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:22, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

I have added the number now. But I don't think that it was necessary. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 22:57, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The "Cathedral Stone" at the West facade of the Trier cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I wonder if this is a valid scope. Couldn't find any related in images from Google with this particular scope -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

@Basile Morin: Please look here. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 07:48, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

• Ok thanks, Lothar.  Support, then -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Slot Zeist, entrance, about 1975.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I will support with the spelling "entrance" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support now -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Havenbuurt (Marken) about 1970.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Spurzem! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)    Thank you. Best whishes for you too. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Nostalgie

In the 80s I had a Maserati with a Nardi steering wheel. It's a very good memory, the steering wheel not the car that was very often down. We can not have on our cars this type of steering wheel. Happy Holidays...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Best wishes for you too. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:DKW F93 Cabrio Lenkrad und Armaturen (Foto Karle Horn).jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-07-22 BMW 502 - Baur-Cabriolet Cockpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentLothar, this looks a bit dark in the shadows on the dashboard. Could you try and raise the shadows a little? --Granada 19:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Perhaps I could. But it would be a bit difficult and here is not FP or KEB but QI. Thank you for your vote. -- Spurzem 21:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)