User talk:Skjoldbro/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:55, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:M84 camouflage.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yann (talk) 14:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Colt C8.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Colt C8.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Colt C8.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

De728631 (talk) 12:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Colt C8 IUR.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Colt C8 IUR.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

De728631 (talk) 12:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


File:Petr Pavel NATO.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kacir (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loch Ness Muppet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Miniapolis 15:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viking-class submarine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 11:43, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Czech army rank insignia[edit]

Hi Skjoldbro, I think you should have uploaded the grey versions separately instead of overwriting the existing files. After all, olive-coloured dress uniforms did exist in the Czech army as you can see here: File:Petr Pavel 2012.JPG, File:Rozlouceni s vaclavem havlem vladislavsky sal 367.jpg, File:Rozlouceni s vaclavem havlem vladislavsky sal 214.jpg. So please consider reverting yourself and create new files for each of the grey insignia. De728631 (talk) 18:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russia-Army-OF-10-2010.svg[edit]

Hallo Skjoldbro,

der Marschall der Russischen Förderation ist nicht ganz korrekt. Laut Bild von Marschall der Russischen Förderation Igor Dmitriyevich Sergeyev, hat der Marschallstern die gleiche Größe wie der Stern des Armeegenerals der Russischen Förderation Sergey Shoigu. Desweiteren hat der Russische Adler auf denn Schulterstücken des Marschall der Russischen Förderation keine Umrandung in "ROT".

--Spieß 950 (talk) 08:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DANILOG logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan Marine Corps Insignia[edit]

Hi, Thanks for uploading Taiwan Marine Corps Insignia. But somethings need to be revised. Ranks of the officers OF-1a to OF-5 can be referred to here, and Generals can be referred to here. Rank OR-4 to OR-9 can be referred to here, and OR-1 to OR-3 can be referred to here. Thanks a lot.--Akira123 03:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bjørn Bisserup.jpg[edit]

Hi Skjoldbro. I and another editor have been unable to verify the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} you have chosen for this file. The relevant discussion is at User talk:Jameslwoodward#File:Bjørn Bisserup.jpg, and any clarification you can provide would be helpful. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for File:Bjørn Bisserup General 2017.jpg. De728631 (talk) 16:48, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File transfers[edit]

Hi, if you transfer files to Commons, please be aware that proper aftercare is mandatory. Make sure that authorship and source information is properly provided. Also please be aware that only OTRS agents are allowed to use the OTRS tags. Jcb (talk) 12:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Accuracy International AX50.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

31.185.214.254 08:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russia-Navy-OF-(D)-1994-everyday.svg[edit]

Hallo Skjoldbro, der Anker der Russischen Marine hat eine andere Form. Bsp.:

Beispiel Bild

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Spieß 950 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kivekäs Kaarlo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Reverts[edit]

Deine Reverts kann man schon als Vandalismus sehen. In den Dateien gibt es sämtliche leere <defs> tags. Die die Dateien unnötig Groß machen. ZellmerLP (talk) 17:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Coat of arms of South Africa.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Underlying lk (talk) 03:29, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shoulder board insignia for the ranks of Commodore, Captain and Commander in the Royal Navy, as worn on the Ceremonial Day Coat[edit]

Hi Skjoldbro, was just wondering if you would be able to create svg versions of the gold shoulderboards of the above ranks, as worn by the Prince of Wales at his wedding (Commander) and the Duke of York at the anniversery celebrations for the Falklands War (Captain)

To clarify; the insignia are:

  • Commodore:Crown, crossed baton & sword and one star.
  • Captain: Crown, one star and a foul anchor.
  • Commander: a crown and a foul anchor.

Here is Royal Navy Commodore Jerry Kyd wearing his gold shoulderboards featuring the crossed baton, sword and one star:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/britains-commodore-jerry-kyd-stands-near-britains-royal-news-photo/454508120?#britains-commodore-jerry-kyd-stands-near-britains-royal-navy-flagship-picture-id454508120

Here is the gold shoulderboards for a Captain; as worn by the Duke of York at the Falklands War 25th commeration:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/license/74690422

Here are the gold shoulderboards for a Commander; as worn again by the Duke of York, at the funeral of the Queen Mother in 2002:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/the-royal-family-gather-at-westminster-abbey-for-the-news-photo/52109003?#the-royal-family-gather-at-westminster-abbey-for-the-funeral-of-the-picture-id52109003

Also; any chance of doing the shoulderboards for Royal Navy chaplains as well?

They can be seen here:

http://badges.wyedeanstores.com/chaplain-royal-navy-epaulette-shoulder-board-rank-badge

Note that any use of the Queen's cypher (EIIR) on the shoulderboards merely reflects that person's appointment as aide-de-camp or chaplain to the Queen, and is not a normal part of the shoulderboard otherwise.

JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing; here is Royal Navy Commodore Jerry Kyd wearing his gold shoulderboards featuring the crossed baton, sword and one star:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/britains-commodore-jerry-kyd-stands-near-britains-royal-news-photo/454508120?#britains-commodore-jerry-kyd-stands-near-britains-royal-navy-flagship-picture-id454508120

Here is the gold shoulderboards for a Captain; as worn by the Duke of York at the Falklands War 25th commeration:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/license/74690422

Here are the gold shoulderboards for a Commander; as worn again by the Duke of York, at the funeral of the Queen Mother in 2002:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/the-royal-family-gather-at-westminster-abbey-for-the-news-photo/52109003?#the-royal-family-gather-at-westminster-abbey-for-the-funeral-of-the-picture-id52109003

Also; any chance of doing the shoulderboards for Royal Navy chaplains as well?

They can be seen here:

http://badges.wyedeanstores.com/chaplain-royal-navy-epaulette-shoulder-board-rank-badge

Note that any use of the Queen's cypher (EIIR) on the shoulderboards merely reflects that person's appointment as aide-de-camp or chaplain to the Queen, and is not a normal part of the shoulderboard otherwise.

Also; don't know if this remotely helps; but there is one for the Australian Navy Chaplains here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Royal_Australian_Navy_Chaplain_rank_slide.png

-The shoulderboards for the (British) Royal Navy are identical; minus the word 'AUSTRALIA'

Many, many, many thanks, JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 10:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Skjoldbro, was just wondering if you would be able to create images of the ranks within the ccf navy section, it is identical to the ranks worn by the Royal Navay Volunteer Reserve, please could you make gold shoulderboards and cuffs of the below ranks.

  • Commodore: one straight large bar and pentagon like circle
  • Captain: 4 wavy bars and pentagon like circle
  • Commander: 3 wavy bars and pentagon like circle
  • Lieutenant Commander: 2 wavy bars, with also small wavy bar in between and pentagon like circle
  • Lieutenant: 2 wavy bars and pentagon like circle
  • Sub-Lieutenant: 1 wavy bars and pentagon like circle
  • Midshipman: Purple Rectangle with Button.

These can be all seen on https://www.naval-history.net/WW2aaRN-PayTables00Ranks-Badges.htm

Many thanks SouthcottC — Preceding unsigned comment added by SouthcottC (talk • contribs) 19:10, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

-which is identical to the rank insignia worn by officers in the Sea Cadet Corps; up to Commander. Note that the RNVR doesn't exist any more, but when it did, CCF (navy section) and SCC officers wore the rank insignia of the RNVR; as they were honorary officers in it. They continue to use this insignia, but are now honorary officers in the RNR.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 08:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:MERC GD.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MERC GD.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MERC GD.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

廣九直通車 (talk) 11:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We are missing high rank pictures in the Article for Soviet Uniforms 1943 - 1955[edit]

I think they changed them soo often, 1918 - 1935, 1935 - 1940, 1940 - 1943, 1943 - 1955, 1955 - 1992... omg^^

You have most pics, just a bit other (there are always different uniforms, maybe because of this?! If someone who has more plan than me, can we use your pics?

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dienstgrade_der_sowjetischen_Streitkr%C3%A4fte_1943%E2%80%931955#Marschall_bis_Generalissimus

You can see for yourself, I tried to directly put it to Marshall ranks, below there are missing pictures too in the sleeve (Ärmel) section.

No Offense, but the only quite okay Russian non ultra low budget Movie (supported by a Putin Ministry), the 9th Company, I look for the "Hauptmann" and his Uniform which has 2 stars vertical and 2 groups each 2 horizontal, but I can't find it... and he got black, means tank & artillery or something else, logistic or so? Than I landed in 43-55, as Afghanistan of course is 1988 in the movie, the 43-55 Captain (right rank already^^) here is closest I saw so far... maybe you know the movie, its dramazited, only 1 survivor, in fact many survived, in the movie the CIA trained troops kick the ass of the hill soldiers except one who is wounded and like "K.O." Whatever, maybe we can improve the article, its not very important but....

Greetings Kilon22 (talk) 14:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vladimir Boldyrev (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not found at URL.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:59, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sauter, W. - Übergang am Oberrhein, 1940.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Becomes PD on January 1st, 2019
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sauter, W. - Westfront, 1940.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Becomes PD on January 1st, 2019
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sauter, W. - Frontsoldat,1938.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Becomes PD on January 1st, 2019
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Army-Denmark-OR-09b.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:32, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sergeant Major of the Army(Denmark) Coin.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sergeant Major of the Army(Denmark) Coin.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

photos patte d'épaule armée sénégalaise[edit]

bonjour je vois que vous avez beaucoup de photos de patte d'épaule. Pourriez vous compléter la page [[1]]? Sinon je peux me renseigner pour avoir des photos des nouvelles pattes d'épaule qui ont changé en janvier 2018. Merci--Mouha.ibs (talk) 12:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

photos patte d'épaule armée sénégalaise[edit]

Bonjour @Skjoldbro: , Vous avez apporté beaucoup de photos de pattes d'épaule pour la marine sénégalaise. Avez vous les nouvelles pattes d'épaules pour les autres grades? Sinon je peux me renseigner pour obtenir des photos. Merci --Mouha.ibs (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shoulder board insignia for the ranks of Captain and Commander in the Royal Navy, as worn on the Ceremonial Day Coat[edit]

Fantastic work as regards the Chaplain shoulder boards and the new Commodore shoulder boards for the Royal Navy; would you be able to do the same for Captain and Commander?

Many, many thanks JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 11:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Military ranks insignia of the Ivory Coast[edit]

Hello. Perhaps you will be interested in this. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 01:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:General Stephen Townsend with Major General Hans-Christian Mathiesen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: All rights reserved.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:46, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:General Stephen Townsend with Major General Hans-Christian Mathiesen (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: All rights reserved.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:General Stephen Townsend with Major General Hans-Christian Mathiesen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammad Nurul Islam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shanaya Pandey (talk) 06:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Army-Denmark-OR-09b.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cyprus Nat. Guard[edit]

Hi Skjoldbro! Thanks for creating File:Emblem of the Cypriot National Guard.svg, but there is a small mistake: an "P" is missing between Y and A. Cheers, Constantine 22:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hollidt Karl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lasch, Wächter, Frank, Fischer, Zörner.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lasch, Wächter, Frank, Fischer, Zörner.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Lasch, Wächter, Frank, Fischer, Zörner.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:07, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lasch, Wächter, Frank, Fischer, Zörner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lasch, Wächter, Frank, Fischer, Zörner (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:13, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:PostDKFlag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

大诺史 (talk) 13:37, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Esben Lunde Larsen (3) - Kim Vadskær (cropped).jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Esben Lunde Larsen (3) - Kim Vadskær (cropped).jpeg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Poland image[edit]

Do you know if this image (or this) falls under PD-Poland? If yes, how can it be uploaded? Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Esben Lunde Larsen (3) - Kim Vadskær (cropped).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:De nieuwe generaal-veldmaarschalken van de Luftwaffe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miskovic-Jovan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Ihre Bilder von Schulterklappen sind ausgezeichnet! gut gemacht MrSimh (talk) 20:58, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Karl Franken en Friedrich Alpers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedrich Alpers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Konrad Henlein (1898-1945).jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Konrad Henlein (1898-1945).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Military service mark of the United States Army.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Military service mark of the United States Army.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kesselring[edit]

How do you know [2] that the photo is by Hoffmann]? The source doesn't give a photographer. DrKay (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DrKay: Hoffmann Postcards Knight Cross Holders Series 1500. Skjoldbro (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Heinrich Himmler v Mariboru (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Space Force favor[edit]

Hey, I was wondering if I could ask a favor of you. I've got no experience with graphics, but was wondering if you would be able to make a digital version of/clean up this image File:Senior Enlisted Advisor for the United States Space Force.png? Garuda28 (talk) 02:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: https://www.spaceforce.mil/News/Article/2135959/cmsgt-towberman-sworn-in-as-the-first-senior-enlisted-advisor-for-the-us-space Also there is a description of the blues uniform, if you feel up for it. Garuda28 (talk) 02:51, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Skjoldbro: I really appreciate you doing this on such short notice. They just released a photo of the SEASF in service dress, and it seems that they still use the Air Corps star (hole in the middle). Any chance you'd be able to make a quick edit to reflect that? File:Roger A. Towberman (4).jpg Garuda28 (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SEA-SF

Hi Mate great work from a fellow Insignia Designer, is ther any chance you make the Line around the delta heaver and give the delta a little more definition, personally I dont like the design, I think they sghould have taken the CMSAF and instead of the Star and wreath in the lower rockers put the Space force Delta there hawkeyebasil (talk)

A little mistake with an argentine navy rank[edit]

Hi. You did an amazingly great job uploading the argentine naval insignias. But there is a little mistake in the rear-admiral rank insignia: the 2 stars should be placed a little more to the center, not over the edge. This picture will be useful as an example. I hope you can fix that little detail... could it be possible?. --Turkmenistan (talk) 07:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simply amazing. Thanks a lot. --Turkmenistan (talk) 09:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

East Turkestan Army/Ili National Army[edit]

Hello, I want to ask some questions in uploading rank insignias for East Turkestan Army. The source rank insignia are based on this picture. I need to know how to properly attribute you and User:MrInfo2012, since I modified some of the rank insignias to create a chart of rank insignias.

Sincerely yours,

--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 04:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyuzoaoi: In general, just use the Template:Attrib, and add file name and creator. Skjoldbro (talk) 07:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ranks of the East Turkestan Army.png
Is there any thing to change?
--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 05:03, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyuzoaoi: maybe under Source, include the original link. Skjoldbro (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is it alright now?--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 15:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:SACEUR visit Bulgaria.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SACEUR visit Bulgaria.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 02:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SACEUR visit Bulgaria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arayik Harutyunyan (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Toghrul Rahimli (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Friedrich Alpers.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Friedrich Alpers.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 08:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Walter Warzecha (1891-1956) (cropped).jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Walter Warzecha (1891-1956) (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 08:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emblem of the Republic of North Macedonia[edit]

Great job designing a vectorized version of the official emblem of the Republic of North Macedonia. I would like to just point out a small design flaw regarding the position of the rays of the sun in the middle. According to the official website of the Army, the sun's rays should be pointed perfectly vertically, horizontally, as well as diagonally. In your upload, the sun is slightly rotated to the right and does not depict the emblem as it is officially placed on the website Army of the Republic of North Macedonia

Draudak (talk) 01:46, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake about the Presidential Standard of Peru[edit]

Thanks for your design, it is rigth, but there is a mistake about the description. There are two different symbols:

The Presidential Standard: It is a flag and has FOUR intis (suns) on each corner. It is used mostly in the official presidential vehicles.

The Command badge of the Supreme Chief of the Armed Forces and the National Police: It is a badge (a big pin to use on the chest) with FIVE suns given by the Armed Forces Joint Command to the President as symbol of his recognition as Supreme Chief after he has sworn to office.

Please correct that as soon as possible.

Wikiperuvian (talk) 06:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

USSF Positional Colors[edit]

Hi, I appreciate you vectorizing the positional colors of the USSF. I just want to call to your attention, though, the proportion of the symbol on the center of the Flag of the Senior Enlisted Adviser, which, I think, is bigger than it's supposed to be. The video source actually shows that the delta does not overlap or reaches the same level as the top point of the two white stars on the flag.--AFLBulawan (talk) 13:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Skjoldbro (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Japanese Navy ranks[edit]

Hi. I have seen your great works on the Imperial Japanese Navy and you need to create the rank of the Emperor (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kaigun-Dai-gensui.png), adding the Imperial Seal (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Japanese_Imperial_Seal.svg). Greetings and thanks.

XxSuguSxX (XxSuguSxX) 23:00 13 Aug 2020 (UTC)

File:191126-D-PB383-016 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 03:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vice Marshal Kim Jong-gak.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Finnusertop (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

VCSO Positional Colors[edit]

Hi, I hope you're doing fine! Could you do also the positional colors for the Vice Chief of Space Operations, United States Space Force? --KingEdinburgh (talk) 03:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Skjoldbro (talk) 06:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse me. can make it?[edit]

Hello. I am not an English speaker. Please excuse me. But while I was walking around Wikimedia, I noticed a distorted flag, 2. "The Caliphate Ensemble of the Yacht Söttlü" and The Ensign of the Battlecruiser Hamidiye in "Naval Museum" and I think it's the exact flag that remains. Is there anyone who can make it?--고려 (talk) 10:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

USSF Lt Gen Positional Colors[edit]

Hi, if you can, could you also do the positional colors of a lieutenant general of the Space Force? It's the same as the Air Force's but on a black background instead of blue: [3]. Thanks as always! --KingEdinburgh (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Skjoldbro (talk) 06:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Danish TV 2 logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Olou (talk) 20:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Japanese Navy shoulder insignia[edit]

Hi. I have seen that you have created the shoulder badges of the IJN, which were missing. However, there is a small error and it is that the chrysanthemum flowers have to be more centered (the only one that is right is the Emperor's).

Here is the photo of how they should be (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E5%B3%B6%E6%9D%91%E4%BF%A1%E6%94%BF.jpg).

XxSuguSxX (talk) 23:14 2 Nov 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Habsburg Field Marshal's Flag.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Habsburg Field Marshal's Flag.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flemish Legion[edit]

Thanks for adding to insignia of the various collaborationist units on Commons! I was wondering if you would consider adding an equivalent shield badge for the Flemish Legion (like these) as well? Would be much appreciated for the article. Brigade Piron (talk) 18:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Brigade Piron: Hey, the link you sent doesn't work. Skjoldbro (talk) 12:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I had in mind the shield-shaped arm badge depicting a black lion on a yellow background - there are plenty of varients on Google Images but here is one example. Brigade Piron (talk) 14:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Brigade Piron: ✓ Done File:Shield of the Flemish Legion.svg Skjoldbro (talk) 14:13, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks! Brigade Piron (talk) 20:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ferenc Szombathelyi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Space Force flags[edit]

Hey, I hope you're doing well. It seems like we may get some Space Force 1 and 2 stars sooner rather than later with how quickly they're moving. Any chance you would be able to do the positional flags for 1, 2, and 4 stars? It looks like they're following the same pattern as the Army/Air Force on this. Thanks! Garuda28 (talk) 00:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Garuda28: ✓ Done File:Flag of a United States Space Force brigadier general.svg, File:Flag of a United States Space Force major general.svg, File:Flag of a United States Space Force general.svg. Added Fictitious flag/svg tag until they are actually adopted. Skjoldbro (talk) 12:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Per usual you are the best! I'll keep an eye out for when they're officially unveiled then remove the tag. Garuda28 (talk) 21:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Horthy 1943.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CAP/USAF flags[edit]

Thanks for adding the clean up version of the Civil Air Patrol flag and flag officer colors! One minor detail I saw to improve the CAP flag is that the current command emblem in the middle doesn't use the "U.S." marking in the middle. An example here (https://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/media/cms/R900_002_8A8354F4FD7C3.pdf) with a visualization of other CAP flags. I had also uploaded the flag of the USAF CMSAF but if possible it would be great if a vector version could be made to have it standardized with other military flags. Thanks. --Elergy123 (talk) 16:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Skjoldbro (talk) 13:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They look great! Thanks! --Elergy123 (talk) 19:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



File:Seal of the United States Civil Air Patrol.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: See prior discussion Commons:Deletion requests/File:Civil Air Patrol seal.png)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Bulhis899.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 03:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



File:Flag of the United States Civil Air Patrol.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Per 36 U.S.C. §40306 and CAPR 900-2 which authorizes the CAP logo only for what is essentially fair-use, which is incompatible with Commons)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Bulhis899.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


File:Seal of the United States Civil Air Patrol.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

And also:

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Royal monograms[edit]

Hi. I just noticed that you had created File:Royal Monogram of Princess Isabella of Denmark.svg a few years ago and it looks fantastic. I was just wondering if you could recreate the royal monograms of Prince Vincent 3 and Princess Josephine of Denmark 4 to be used on their articles. Cheers :) Keivan.fTalk 07:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SVG[edit]

Hey @Skjoldbro: ,


Could you make an SVG file of

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Somaliland_Police_Force_Logo.jpg

Many thanks. Siirski (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CAP Officer Ranks[edit]

Hi. Thanks for improving the design on the Civil Air Patrol officer rank epaulettes! I've always wanted to made them but don't know how to do it. One little nitpick to improve the ranks of second lieutenant, first lieutenant, and captain are that, like the Air Force, they don't use the white line underneath the insignia. I appreciate all the work you do. Thanks! --Elergy123 (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

First Sergeant diamond/Command chief star size[edit]

Hey, I just came across these images from the af site (https://www.af.mil/News/Art/igphoto/2000586410/ and https://www.af.mil/News/Art/igphoto/2000791648/) and I think that they may be a little large. You think you would be able to modify the ranks here to mirror the star/diamond size? Thanks! Garuda28 (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Garuda28: ✓ Done Skjoldbro (talk) 08:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Skjoldbro: Thank you! Also thanks for the improvements on the service dress officer rank as well! I saw you made CAP shoulder marks (looks sharp) and was wondering if you were planning to create ones for USAF shoulder marks (Class B) or mess dress shoulder boards, by chance? Garuda28 (talk) 22:58, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Garuda28: I wasn't planning to, but I did since you asked (Here). Finding consistent reference images for these wasn't that easy, so I worked with what I had. Hope they are ok. Skjoldbro (talk) 14:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I’m impressed you got those done so quickly! Thank you! Garuda28 (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Skjoldbro: Thank you again! Only thing I noticed is that the field grade insignia for the class B may be a tad to far centered. I think you got it right on the money with the File:US-Air Force-McPeak-O5.svg one you did! Thank you again! Your work is amazing. Garuda28 (talk) 23:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CCF adult Staff Sergeant rank slide request[edit]

Hi, could you please add a CCF adult Staff Sergeant rank slide to the Combined Cadet Force page? The others are good and it would be great to have them all the same.--Hooky58 (talk) 14:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SL Ranks quality[edit]

Hi @Skjoldbro: , I saw your great work creating military ranks could you make quality for en:Military ranks of Somaliland

Many Thanks --Siirski (talk) 22:50, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you make Proper SVG for others too? --Siirski (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Skjoldbro: , thank you very much for the high-quality military ranks, if you have plenty of time please fix the ranks Emblem .
Thank you so much. --Siirski (talk) 17:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Airborne Forces post-2011[edit]

Hey, I just realized that there's no post-2010 Russian Airborne Forces rank insignia. (Standard Green insides with AF blue trim). If you've got the time, do you know if you'd be willing to make it?Garuda28 (talk) 17:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Skjoldbro: Thank you! Would you be willing to make the two OF-9s and warrant officers as well? Both the RuSF and VDV seem to use the same rank and RuSF Army General Vladimir Popovkin made it up to that rank. As always, your work is amazing! Garuda28 (talk) 03:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SLD 30 Guidon[edit]

Hi. The newly redesignated Space Launch Delta 30 just released their new guidon here: https://media.defense.gov/2021/May/14/2002642174/-1/-1/0/210514-F-IN231-2003.JPG. If you can, would you be able to doing their graphics for their inclusion in the unit's article? KingEdinburgh (talk) 09:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem for the Danish Royal Life Guards.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Palnatoke (talk) 15:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Turkish navy sign[edit]

Hi, I upload File:Turkey-Navy-OF-10.svg. But when I see, I found some little object bugs. Can you fix these bugs? --Jelican9 (talk) 19:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skjoldbro, you uploaded File:Generalinspekteur der Bundeswehr, General Eberhard Zorn (cropped).jpg which is a crop of File:Generalinspekteur der Bundeswehr, General Eberhard Zorn.jpg which I nominated for deletion. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 11:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise File:161213 Zorn Quelle Christian Thiel (cropped).jpg. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lt Col General map[edit]

Hi! I noticed you have made the map File:Use of the General-Potpukovnik rank in Europe.svg including Croatia in use of the Lieutenant Colonel General rank. Since no such rank name (or translation thereof) exists in Croatian armed forces, the map is clearly erroneous. I intend to remove the references to Croatia in the en-wiki article shortly, and this is just a heads up that I intend to remove the map as erroneous for the same reasons. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stapo rank insignia[edit]

Hello, thanks for uploading the rank insignia for Stapo (en:Statspolitiet). It looks like your drawings are based on the photo in the English article of Wikipedia from Trondheim museum. However, the lighting of this photo seems to have distorted the original colors. As you can see on the other photo from the same museum (in the Norwegian version of the article), the piping of the insignia and the color of collar tags were actually green like in the German police and SD, and not black. I wonder if it would be possible to correct this? Regards, --Dmitri Lytov (talk) 00:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dmitri Lytov: hey, thanks for the heads up, I will get around to it in the near future if I have the time. Skjoldbro (talk) 11:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Space Force Delta emblems[edit]

@Skjoldbro: Hi!. Thank you for uploading the SLD 30 guidon. I changed the background though to make it look darker and closer to the actual gray in the photo, taking the color from the OCSO patch. I don't know how to work with svg, so I think I may have done something wrong with the new file because it ouputs differently than the original one. Anyway, it seems that design is the standard design for all U.S. Space Force deltas: used here [4] and here [5]. I was wondering maybe you could do the guidons for all the deltas: specifically SLD 45, DEL 2, DEL 3, DEL 4, DEL 5, DEL 6, DEL 7, DEL 8, and DEL 9. Thanks in advance. KingEdinburgh (talk) 10:10, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KingEdinburgh: Shouldn't be too much of an issue or too much work, I will see if I can get it done in the near future. Skjoldbro (talk) 11:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@KingEdinburgh: ✓ Done, at Category:Guidons of the United States Space Force. If you feel like it, en:Guidon (United States) needs to be updated with Space Force. Skjoldbro (talk) 12:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Skjoldbro: Thank you!! Will get to doing that as well. KingEdinburgh (talk) 01:25, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Missing rank insignia German Women’s Auxiliary Services[edit]

Hi Skjoldbro, I have a question. I am still missing some rank insignia from the German Women's Auxiliary Services. Would you still like to make these? I understand if you're busy or not in the mood. The ones you have already uploaded are top quality, thank you. Regards, --Maddriver371 (talk) 17:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maddriver371: I might be able to get around to making some of them, but I'm not sure that I will be able to get all. I find the ranks and their changes confusing, and not all are available in photo references. I will get around to making as many as I can in the near future. Skjoldbro (talk) 11:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Skjoldbro: these website have various pictures with ranks of German Women’s Auxiliary Services:

- Несколько моментов по униформе в классном фильме "Щит и меч". Часть 2 (half way on the website)
- Wehrmacht Auxiliary Forces
- Nachrichtenhelferinnen des Heeres (Vfg. v. 1. 10. 1940, HM 40, Nr. 1085) I hope these wil give you some idea. Thanks and regards, --Maddriver371 (talk) 12:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Space Systems Command flag[edit]

@Skjoldbro: Hi! Only if you have the spare time, would you be able to upload the Space Systems Command? It was just recently revealed during the activation of the unit. Reference here [6] but it isn't quite clear; it can be seen here [7]. Basically it is just a black field, the emblem, and what appears to be 2021 in roman numerals. Thank you! KingEdinburgh (talk) 04:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KingEdinburgh: ✓ Done File:Flag of the Space Systems Command.svg. Skjoldbro (talk) 10:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Flag of a United States Space Force major general.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veverve (talk) 10:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of a United States Space Force general.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veverve (talk) 10:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Japanese Army sleeve[edit]

Hi. You can create the sleeve insignia of the rank (show: https://www.militaryimages.net/media/japanese-army-ranks-ww2.7307/). Thanks. XxSuguSxX (discusión) 08:21, 7 Sep 2021 (UTC)

The sleeve of the Emperor is 4 lines and 4 stars XxSuguSxX (discusión) 21:17, 10 Sep 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Flag of the Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom).svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A SVG request[edit]

Hello, Skjoldbro. Can you make a SVG version of File:Donanma Komutanlığı logosu.png? --Henrymorgan92 (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11 October[edit]

Hi, i request you please create a flag of Pakistan armed forces which is showing in this picture?[1] This is the logo of Pakistan armed forces which is showing in the center of flag.

And here you can see low quality flag[2] Ytpks896 (talk) 10:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A request for SVG images (SOUTHCOM, EUCOM)[edit]

Good afternoon, fellow Wikimedianǃ SuperWIKI here with a friendly request, if time is on your side. I've just noticed that certain unified combatant commands don't have any images of their SSIs or DUIs on Commons, which as far as I know should be covered under the {PD-USGov-Military} public domain license. This came to my notice from Laura J. Richardson's Wikipedia page, upon promotion to general, not having an image for her SOUTHCOM SSI. May I ask that, if you have the time, you create a EUCOM SSI SVG and SOUTHCOM SSI SVG image? SuperWIKI (talk) 12:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rank insignia[edit]

Hi.

Did you make the rank insignia featured on the Icelandic police site? GeneralH (talk) 00:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Colonestarrice (talk) 17:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logos history[edit]

Please, when a logo changes (just in case of the coat of arms of the Argentine Navy) don't overwrite the file, per Commons:Overwriting existing files. If a new version of the logo exists, it should be uploaded separately. Fma12 (talk) 21:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine navy[edit]

Similar case for the Argentine Navy emblem; don't overrite existing files with different versions, please. Fma12 (talk) 09:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian military flags[edit]

Hello,

Can you please fix the problem with the Romanian Air Force and the Romanian Navy flags? On the current version, there is a second beak of the eagle floating near the cross. Alin2808 (talk) 19:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turkey-Navy-OF-9a-collected.svg[edit]

Hello your works are really precious but there is a mistake in this pic. The half strip must be full strip as u load in 25 February 2021. Best regards... please look this link https://www.rutbe.net/general-rutbe-isaretleri_167.htm

Thanks u edited it. The pic is correct now. But u can see the correct picture when u click on it otherwise u continue to see the wrong one with the other ranks. Halil Oran (talk) 00:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now that's OK, thank you very much. Halil Oran (talk) 18:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About Turkish ranks[edit]

Hi, I have undo operations on the following files. Because it looks like the one I uploaded on the Navy's website.

Template:Re The reason that I have undone your file changes, is that while accurate to images on their website, they are not an accurate to real-life representations of the ranks per image 1 image 2 image 3. Please do not change them again. Skjoldbro (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm okay. Jelican9 (talk) 22:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Insignia of Regiments of Indian Army[edit]

Hello Template:Ping

I request you to please create SVG vector images of insignia of Indian Army's regiments. If you wish to do so here is the list of insignia -

Thanks and hope you will respond.

Regards Soap Boy 1 (talk) 20:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

STARCOM flag[edit]

Hey! Saw you did the Space Systems Command flag - Looks like STARCOM has its own as well. It also looks like the frill and lettering is actually based on the command's color as well! https://www.dvidshub.net/image/6799297/starcom-activation-ceremony Garuda28 (talk) 23:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AutotranslateDiannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Embroidering Removal[edit]

Hello, I was wondering if you could assit in removing the embroidering on these Public Health Service rear admiral and deputy surgeon general flags? Thanks. Neovu79 ([[User talk:Neovu79|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gallery

Template:Re Template:Done, at Category:Flags of the United States Public Health Service Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SF/DS emblem[edit]

Template:Ping Hi! Would you be able to digitize the emblem for the Director of Staff of the United States Space Force (here). It's based off of the Space Force's heraldic shape for squadrons (samples here). Thank you! KingEdinburgh ([[User talk:KingEdinburgh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Deletion Notification Bot/SDEL/headingless

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate DrKay ([[User talk:DrKay|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rank[edit]

Good Morning

I am french, I must inform you that the rank File:France-Navy-OF-10 Sleeve (WWI).svg never existed.

Kind regards Template:UnsignedIP2

Please read:
The sources clearly states what the Admiral of France look like at the time. Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statuszeichen_HptFw_WMacht,_NVA_und_Stascha_SS.svg[edit]

Title and description of following file are erroneous: Statuszeichen_HptFw_WMacht,_NVA_und_Stascha_SS.svg . The file shows the insignia of a Company Sergeant Major of German Wehrmacht and SS correctly. But the double row of trim was never used by the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA) of the German Democratic Republik (GDR). They had a single row of trim only. Would you alter the title of that graphic file, please? Maybe in File:Statuszeichen_HptFw_WMacht_und_Stascha_SS.svg ? Many thanks,--Wasserläufer ([[User talk:Wasserläufer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

For Naval Ensign of IndiaVector File. Swapnil1101 ([[User talk:Swapnil1101|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for IJN ranks[edit]

Hello. I updated the table for officers' ranks in Wikipedia:Ranks of the Imperial Japanese Navy#Commissioned officer ranks to properly account for special duty officers. However, now the three shoulder insignia pictures specific to special duty officers (i.e, for LT, LTjg and ENS) are still missing, so I had to leave footnotes (see footnotes [d] in the table). Perhaps if you have some time, could you please create and insert them? I guess you would just need to take the warrant officer shoulder insignia with the thinner middle stripe and put cherry blossoms on it. Thank you. Path-x21 ([[User talk:Path-x21|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

USSF Shoulderboards[edit]

Hi! Would you be able to do the new shoulderboards for USSF officers? Thank you. KingEdinburgh ([[User talk:KingEdinburgh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:03, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Re Hey, I am planning to make them as soon as the new uniform is introduced, which it doesn't seem to be right now. The Class A have been changed to fit the current interim ranks. Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking maybe the new uniforms that General John W. Raymond is now currently using here, here and here. I was thinking of changing the O-10 shoulderboard on his Wiki bio given he's now wearing the new uniform all the time. Would you be able to do that, or will you be waiting until it's widely used? Thanks. KingEdinburgh ([[User talk:KingEdinburgh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:05, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Template:ReThe USSF is using an interim uniform, which will be used until 2025. Hence why I'm hesitant to go around making all the ranks. I have however made the O-10 rank. Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pi.1415926535 ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:17, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unit's from Danish Army[edit]

Nice works about Badges/coat of arms for unit's and regiments from Danish Army. I hobe you will continue to transform (clean up) thinks to the right format, if the files I upload I upload is out of format (but it's coat of arms and and bagdes I upload). user: Johnbp2

Request[edit]

Hy Bro I Request You Please Make The Flag Of Pakistan Armed Forces. Template:UnsignedIP2

How did you make the SADF rank insignia?[edit]

I want to learn how to make things like that so I can make my own for a project I'm working on. Can you teach me how? -BillyBobBoeBoe

New Ethiopian Rank Insignia[edit]

Now the Ethiopian Military now has new rank insignia https://www.facebook.com/fdredefense.official/posts/1305322729986466

ottoman military rank insignia[edit]

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmanl%C4%B1_%C4%B0mparatorlu%C4%9Fu%27nun_asker%C3%AE_r%C3%BCtbeleri Template:Unsigned2

Hello, there is a mistake about the insignia of ottoman military ranks, in generals section. Because u used the same insignia with the senior officers (colonol, lt. col. and major) for example col. rank insignia has 3 stripes but general rank insignia must be 5 stripes i mean general ranks must be wider, thicker and bigger.

u can use this link and picture for your work:

https://tr.pinterest.com/pin/760826930780157805/

Template:Unsigned2

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 13:06, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

USSF GO shoulderboards rotated[edit]

Hi! It seems the Space Force is slowly transitioning GO uniforms to the new uniform: Gen Thompson is now using it and I think I saw Lt Gen Armagno using it during Saltzman's change of responsibility ceremony. Would you be able to do shoulderboards for the rest of GO ranks and, if so, have a version that is rotated like this for GOs' promotion dates in their bios. Thank you! KingEdinburgh ([[User talk:KingEdinburgh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:47, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1953 Danish Landsting election.svg[edit]

Hej, da du lagde en ny version af File:1953 Danish Landsting election.svg, huskede du så at opdatere signaturforklaringerne på de wikier, der brugte filen? Palnatoke ([[User talk:Palnatoke|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:12, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Provisional Russian Navy[edit]

You make mistake in admirals rank insignia. In your drawing, all three stripes are the same width. In reality, the admirals have the lower braid width of 1, and the upper 3/4. (https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/lot1959/78260734/1121146/1121146_original.jpg) In addition, it would be good if you added insignia that do not have naval ranks. ViTverd ([[User talk:ViTverd|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Fma12 ([[User talk:Fma12|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chilean Army[edit]

Dear Skoljdbro, If you allow me, I have rotated the image that you have reverted to me because it is the position in which the original image is (which you can see here). I would appreciate it if you did not reverse my edition since I consider that the vectorized image should be the same as the original. FalconKight ([[User talk:FalconKight|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Re The reason that I have uploaded it this way, is to follow the official source. The orientation of PNG images have no effect on this. If you want to use upright images use this or upload a new one with that orientation. Stop rotating these images. Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The correct order of shoulders of generals of Chilean Army is that I reverted, the other order is wrong. Is curious this that you told me about the official source, because exist many files of shoulders of many armies, and not have the rotation in the articles that you told me that is according of the official source, and this source don't exist more in the official site of Chilean Army.--Patodonald1818 ([[User talk:Patodonald1818|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Re Are you saying the official website is wrong? Because you are right it is curious that people keep insisting to rotate the images in the wrong direction or simply refusing to use the other images with the upright placement. Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, because the order of shoulders not is the correct, and this "official source" don't exist more, in fact is a version that was archived.
For example, in this picture you can see the correct order of shoulders of generals of Chilean Army:
https://cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/infobae/NJU44JQSDRAWLOFMHVCIMBX4C4.jpg Patodonald1818 ([[User talk:Patodonald1818|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know, this is same orientation as the official website and the one that the images currently have. What is your argument? Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The argument is that check you the pictures of uniforms of Chileans generals of Army and Carabineros, and see you that not have this rotation. The confusion come, because in the past the official site of Chilean Army wanted put the shoulders of generals with this representation for distinguish of the rest of images of ranks, but was something simply aesthetic, don't meaning that this is the correct order of shoulders, and I understand that is confuse, because the old version of website archived created this confusion.
Other picture of Chilean Generals of Chilean Army with the real order of shoulders:
https://dialogo-americas.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/CHL-Army-Commander.png Patodonald1818 ([[User talk:Patodonald1818|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:58, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not understanding how you can say this. The image you just showed me has the same orientation as the ones I uploaded, and the official website. If you are making the argument that the ranks should be oriented as, seen from the front, then ALL rank images on wiki are uploaded wrong. Additionally, if you are arguing that my images have the wrong orientation, then these images also have wrong orientation. Because as you just noted, and per official website, the orientation of the General insignia and the insignia of other officers are not the same. As seen here. It is 100% clear for everyone, that the two images have two different orientations, and if Brigadier have upright orientation, then it is only logical that generals are horizontal. There is no argument to be made otherwise. Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And for rotate the shoulders of generals of Carabineros what your argument?
The official source not have the shoulders of generals with the rotation that you uploaded:
https://www.carabineros.cl/secciones/gradosInstitucionales/phone/index.html Patodonald1818 ([[User talk:Patodonald1818|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Re Can't access your link, but it is clearly the same. No one can argue that general insignia and other officer have the same orientation. As such the generals for army and Carabineros both have horizontal rank insignia, while other officers have upright insignia. Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot 2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Deletion Notification Bot/SDEL/headingless

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot 2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Military Intelligence Corps emblem[edit]

I created a Military Intelligence Corps emblem via ray-tracing a PNG. Can I request your assistance to improve this, as I was told ray-tracing is discouraged for SVGs? SuperWIKI ([[User talk:SuperWIKI|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Re Template:Done. Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

您好!有些台灣軍隊肩章的事想請您幫忙[edit]

感謝您在維基共享資源上,對於台灣軍隊肩章的貢獻。我發現過去一兩年,有國外使用者使用了我製作的早期憲兵旗上的憲兵徽章,上傳了兵科標誌和底色都不正確的憲兵肩章,不知可否請您協助更正?謝謝您。 Akira123 talk 03:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Space Force officer rank[edit]

I saw that you converted all of the General Officer ranks to the Space Force black/blue. Was wondering if you'd be willing to do the same with the FGO and CGO ranks? Garuda28 ([[User talk:Garuda28|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Re Still waiting for the uniform to be approved on FGO and CGO level, and wont be available until 2025. I would rather not break en:WP:FUTURE. Skjoldbro ([[User talk:Skjoldbro#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Re A fair point. I'll be sure to ping you when I see news that they are. Garuda28 ([[User talk:Garuda28|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Secretary of the Navy Japan SVG version[edit]

Hello Skjoldbro, can you please make a SVG version of this flag? I don't know how to do SVG. Artanisen ([[User talk:Artanisen|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PLA Rocket Force ranks[edit]

Sorry to bug you again, but looks like the PLA Rocket Force adopted their own uniform a while back and that includes their unique darker green colored ranks instead of green. Is this something you'd be interested in doing? https://defence-blog.com/pla-rocket-force-issues-new-dress-and-service-uniform/ Garuda28 ([[User talk:Garuda28|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Polarlys ([[User talk:Polarlys|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Well-Informed Optimist ([[User talk:Well-Informed Optimist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your flag[edit]

Hello, you have a mistake on your file: File:Flag of the General Staff (Czech Republic).svg. Correct inscription is: ARMÁDY ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY not armáda. Thank you. ThecentreCZ ([[User talk:ThecentreCZ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Rosenzweig τ 13:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Space Force officer rank color correction[edit]

So it looks like the Space Force service dress is actually a midnight blue instead of a pure black. Right now it looks like the Space Force rank insignia for officers here is pure black, but the enlisted rank is actually a midnight blue. Would you be able to perform this color correction for the officers?

Also looks like we got our first picture of a non-general officer (lieutenant colonel?) in the new uniform! https://www.gettyimages.ae/detail/news-photo/military-aide-carries-a-briefcase-known-as-the-nuclear-news-photo/1255704639 Garuda28 ([[User talk:Garuda28|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YUNUSA[edit]

Abba Template:UnsignedIP2

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 15:26, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate CzarJobKhaya ([[User talk:CzarJobKhaya|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey-air-force-OF-10.svg[edit]

Hello, can you create Turkey-air-force-OF-10.svg like your other works Turkey-army-OF-10.svg and Turkey-air-force-OF-1a.svg. I would be very pleased. --Temp.fb.1907 ([[User talk:Temp.fb.1907|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:09, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Belarusian rank insignia by Belarusian Government-in-Exile[edit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbLYQTdxI4Q

Could you make some rank insignia and uniforms for this? Kyuzoaoi ([[User talk:Kyuzoaoi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the letter A[edit]

As an IP user pointed out at en:Talk:Czech Air Force#Misspelling in the flag, there's a letter ‘A’ too many in File:Flag of the Czech Air Force.svg. I tried to correct it, and encountered several layers of difficulty, mostly because the text is not text but some strange mix of paths (involving path7377. The SVG file also does contain the text, but changing that has no effect.) If there is a way how to fix that that doesn't take too much of your time, i would like to learn it. Otherwise, could you please fix it? ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 20:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

USSF GO shoulderboards[edit]

Hi! Would you be able to make the rest of the Space Force's officer shoulderboards (including rotated versions)? It seems that they've been using the new uniform now for all ranks. Thank you! KingEdinburgh ([[User talk:KingEdinburgh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 192.38.90.21 09:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]