User talk:SergeWoodzing/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Filemover

Please request filemover rights: Commons:Requests_for_rights#Filemover

Thanks a lot! hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 09:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanx for the suggestion, but I don't know if I'll be needing them after this one project (see two previous sectiosn here) is finished. There are now only about 350 left out of over 2000 in my assignment. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Pau 5 20101028.JPG

File:Pau 5 20101028.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Latest changes in Category: Haelwig of Schleswig

Hi, I just want to know why did you reverted my edition. The corresponding page in Wikipedia attests specifically that she belonged to the Estridsen dynasty. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for writing, but this belongs on that page's talk page, where you wrote nothing, but reverted this without discussion the the right place.
I'm glad you did though, as I was wrong in this case and you were right. Confused her with Queen Haelwig of Sweden, who was a Schaumburg.
I apologize. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

File:File:Christina Magdalene of Sweden c.1660

I removed the English description here because the description of this portrait in the Stockholm Nationalmuseum was in Swedish only, I apologize for having done this. PancoPinco 18:30, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Gunilla Bernadotte

She (and Marianne Bernadotte) does belong to the royal family, but not the court itself. Even the Royal Court says so on their website.

http://www.kungahuset.se/royalcourt/royalfamily.4.396160511584257f21800060.html

I have reverted your edit.

Kaiketsu (talk) 12:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Belonging to the extended "Royal Family" of Sweden and belonging to the "House of Bernadotte" are not the same thing. The house is genealogical. That's why the term House of is used. You will not find these ladies listed anywhere (correctly) in Swedish as belonging to Huset Bernadotte. It is not common on Commons to play around with genealogical categories. Please do not continue doing so! --80.216.53.132 18:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please don't write to me here when the discussion belongs on the page which it concerns! This does not concern me personally. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Coat of arms

Hi. Sorry I didn't get back to you before with respect to your Coat of Arms requests. Looking at File:Arms of Prince Lennart Bernadotte SVG.svg etc. it looks as though someone else managed to help you out =) /Lokal_Profil 16:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. It worked out very well. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


Coats of arms of the Princess Sofia and Prince Oscar

Hello Serge I hope you are well.

Do you have information on the coats of arms of the Princess Sofia and Prince Oscar please because I find nothing.

Thank you in advance for your help, good day

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 02:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

The coats of arms of all the new little ones could easily be created using the formats of their siblings & cousins, just replacing the provicial arms. Let me know if you can't find them & I'll do that for you. In Sofia's case we must wait till the royal court issues her arms, as there will probably be something enirely new in the middle. There have been a few suggestions, but nothing has been released yet. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Good evening Serge,

Thank you very much for your answer

See you soon

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 18:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Arms of Prince Oscar Bernadotte SVG.svg

File:Arms of Prince Oscar Bernadotte SVG.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Elzo 90 (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Arms of Prince Lennart Bernadotte SVG.svg

File:Arms of Prince Lennart Bernadotte SVG.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Elzo 90 (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Arms of Prince Sigvard Bernadotte SVG.svg

File:Arms of Prince Sigvard Bernadotte SVG.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Elzo 90 (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Prince Bernadotte 1951 Luxembourg decree.svg

FYI, I reverted your recent upload because it seems that you uploaded a file with corrupt SVG code. There was no thumbnail and even the originally sized image could not be parsed showing plain text SVG code instead. Regards, De728631 (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! I addressed the problem here and have asked for help. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


Arms source?

Hello Serge,

My source is Dynastien Bernadottes vapen och det svenska riksvapnet, Stockholm, Svensk Litteratur, coll. « Skrifter utgivna av Riksheraldikerämbetet »,‎ 1944 of Arvid Berghman p. 117

Cordially good day--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you DQF! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)


Your opinion

Hello Serge, I hope you are well.

Could I please have your opinion, because I have a doubt ....

Here is a painting of "normally" King Albert of Sweden, Duke of Mecklenburg.

What gives me a doubt this is the necklace he wears his neck .... the medallion there is the symbol of the province of Gotland ... it was never lord or Duke of Gotland!

While his son Crown Prince Eric ... yes from 1396 to 1397

(https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_%C3%B6ver_Sveriges_hertigar_och_hertiginnor#Gotland)

Do you think this pourait be a mistake?


Thank you in advance for your response, good weekend to you

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

If I had to guess I would say Eric. Albert's supporters took over Gotland and Eric represented his father there until he died. Sorry to say all we can do is guess. The only certain contemporary portrait of King Albert is his grave monument. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:08, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
PS: This is a more legitimate portrait of King Albert from the same source, which makes me even more strongly believe the other painting is of Eric. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Good evening Serge,

And thank you for your answer is what I think also

Thank you for your help, good day to you

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

File:James of Dacia statue Tarecuato.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:James of Dacia statue Tarecuato.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 15:34, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Given what I wrote on the talkj page there, this was hardly necessary. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:10, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
These messages are automatically placed on the uploader's talk page when you tag a file for speedy deletion using the Commons toolbox. Many users don't add such links manually but rely on the built-in one-click mechanisms, so I assume LX didn't even add this message to your talk page himself. De728631 (talk) 17:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! I apologized for this one on that talk page. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
PS - I'm going for a coffee break now. Let's both try to stay out of trouble in the meantime. Wiederse'en a' bisschen später. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
And yet you didn't bother to tag it for deletion or even remove the claim that you were the copyright holder from the file description. A comment on a talk page usually won't make anything happen. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
I thought I did that - can't check it now anyway. I have apologized. What else would you like me to do? If you'd like to take some kind of action against me, go ahead! If you just came here now to pick a fight - stop it please! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
No, there was no deletion tag. If there were, I wouldn't have tagged it. It's okay though, just be more careful in the future. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
You have made your point. I didn't notice the Metadata with the copyright info until after I had uploaded the file, and it was too late, which I explained on that talk page. I also noted there that the Metadata date info obviously was false. Can we leave this now, please? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:42, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Kulla-Gulla movie poster 1956.jpg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Kulla-Gulla movie poster 1956.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

De728631: I had just uploaded that and didn't even have time to add the rest of the info. Seems there are quite a few movie posters on Commons, Swedish ones as well as many others. Are they all non-free? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The posters in Category:Movie posters of Sweden have either been published under a free licence or they are out of copyright due to old age. Your upload didn't seem to qualify for either so I deleted it. Please be sure to add the copyright info from the beginning, and please keep also in mind that uploading a copy of such posters does not make you the author as in {{Own}}. The copyright holder/author is the original designer or the film company depending on Swedish law. I'd be happy to restore the file though if you have more information about the copyright of this poster that would make it either public domain or verify a free licence. De728631 (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Will you please give me time, like a few hours, to adjust all the info of all the images I just uploaded, like I've been doing for years now? Please!!!--SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
As you might have noticed, I am uploading a batch of images alphabetically right now. and as I always do, I will provide all the necessary info about sources and authors and categories within a very short time period. That's why it says "pending" on each one of them until I do that. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:43, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Hrm, if you need a few hours to adjust vital information like copyright for a mass upload you should reconsider your method of uploading. "Description: pending" is alright for adding a description (which is not even required), but for legal reasons we need information about the copyright of an image from scratch. A simple note in the copyright section stating that you need some time to provide all necessary copyright information would already suffice to prevent your uploads from being speedily deleted. Now that I know about it I won't delete any more of your most recent uploads. But in case of this file, please let me know when you have gathered more information that would allow for its restoration. De728631 (talk) 16:57, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! I have an old computer that dies at times, so uploading is always a real thriller, and my eyesight is quite poor. Would appreciate being able to use my regular method. It has worked very well for many years. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

De728631: I think the same would apply in this case as here. That's what I would have used. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 02:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I disagree in this case. File:Kulla-Gulla movie poster 1956.jpg has a distinctive background that might have come from the film itself so it's not just a bunch of "journalistic" photographs. Instead I think the entire arrangement constitutes an artistic work. That said, I would not have kept this either. You are welcome though to list the Kulla-Gulla file at Commons:Undeletion requests. De728631 (talk) 18:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm OK with it. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Lars Jacob & Leo poster 1971

This belongs on the file's talk page, not here. I'm moving it there. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Miami

It's not a mistake; I'm adding the basic info pattern into a template {{USA location info}} which is to be put atop of every U.S. city's category. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 09:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

You removed the important info that Miami and Miami Beach are two different cities. Do you think that's helpful? I'm reinstating it again. If you keep removing helpful information I'll have to complain about you. Sorry! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Marielle Lagergren & Marianne Bernadotte 2015.jpg

File:Marielle Lagergren & Marianne Bernadotte 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ella24La (talk) 10:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Charlotte of Luxembourg statue 2015 Luxembourg.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Charlotte of Luxembourg statue 2015 Luxembourg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Berthold Werner (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SergeWoodzing/Archive_3&oldid=659212324"