User talk:Sailko/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Cappella Colleoni, foto[edit]

... se non è urgente cercherò di farle io, per altro non saprei chi suggerirti. Ciao --Giorces (talk) 12:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lorenzo Lotto[edit]

Seeing you are uploading lots of Lottos (Lotti? :-)), do you happen to have another, maybe better, version of this painting? Thank you very much! --Edelseider (talk) 14:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have this on my book, sorry --Sailko (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is it genuine? The painting, I mean. Some historians say, it is an authentic Lotto, others seem to doubt it. I'm not very well informed. It is attributed to Lotto in Strasbourg, that's for sure. Cheers, --Edelseider (talk) 17:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have now a book at home listing all known lotto's paintings... will tell you soon. --Sailko (talk) 18:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thank you very much! --Edelseider (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it's listed! It is dated 1545-1546, 141,5x219 cm :) --Sailko (talk) 22:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ottimo! I've added the date to the file. --Edelseider (talk) 08:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photos de l'Église San Agostino de Pérouse[edit]

Quelque contributeur aura-il il une photo à télécharger pour illustrer l'articlr sur wiki:fr? Merci d'avance Adri08 (talk) 09:17, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Web Gallery of Art[edit]

Hello, I noticed you are very active lately uploading images from Web Gallery of Art. I am working on uploading all the PD images from that website as I mentioned in Commons:Batch uploading/Web Gallery of Art. I am in the process of downloading 22k of their images and matching them with the ones we already have at commons so I know what needs to be uploaded. I will also be adding {{Artwork}}, {{Creator}}, {{Institution}} and {{WGA link}} images from www.wga.hu that we already have. Could you halt your uploads from www.wga.hu for a few months until I am done with the process? It would help with my task. Also If you would like I would be grateful if you would like to help with Commons:Batch uploading/Web Gallery of Art tasks.--Jarekt (talk) 15:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vasi canosini[edit]

Ciao Sailko. Come va? Tutto bene? E' da un po' che non ci si sente. Ascolta, c'è un certo cortocircuito nelle informazioni (e dunque nel nome del file) che tu hai dato ai quattro vasi figurati provenienti da Canosa che hai caricato. Potresti per favore ricontrollare la fonte da cui hai attinto le informazioni e i dati archeologici? Di modo che poi correggiamo le didascalie e chiediamo il rename dei files. Perché così come stanno ora è veramente impossibile. Grazie e un caro abbraccio, --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC) PS: ci si vede a Roma il prox 11 giugno?[reply]

Avevo cercato in internet per verificare i dati direttamente sul sito del BM, ma non sono riuscito a trovare niente. Hai un link da consigliarmi? Il fatto è che mancano anche i nr. di inventario che spesso sono determinanti per risalire al pezzo. Certo le informazioni sono stucchevoli. Il dato "etrusco" mi sembra da intuire deriva dalla sezione museale in cui questi vasi sono esposti al BM; ma questa è una bestialità grande quanto una casa, perché come tu ben sai gli etruschi sono uno dei pochissimi popoli dell'Italia antica che NON sono italici, quindi mettere vasi dauni o lucani o sanniti o di altri popoli italici nella sezione etrusca è semplicemente scandaloso. E mi meraviglio del BM ! Meglio allora creare una sezione tipo "Italic peoples". Cuma e Cales anche mi lasciano estremamente perplesso. Io ho lavorato nei depositi archeologici di Calvi Risorta e non ho mai trovato nulla di dauno: la qual cosa è anche logica, perché da un lato Cales è lontana dalle direttive con la Puglia, dall'altro aveva una produzione smisurata di ceramiche che esportava ovunque, dunque non aveva assolutamente bisogno di importarne. Cuma pure: mai sentito di vasi dauni trovati a Cuma (e noi al Museo Archeologico di Napoli) abbiamo l' 80-90% dei corredi tombali scavati a Cuma. Possibile che l'unico vaso dauno trovato a Cuma si trova al BM? Un bel numero di vasi dauni provenienti dalla Campania si sono trovati nell'antica Suessula (Acerra), trovandosi essa allo sbocco delle vallate che ancora oggi sono la via più diretta per giungere in Puglia (oggi vi passa l'autostrada A16). Sai cosa penso? Che queste provenienze assurde provengono dal mercato antiquario, dal quale questi vasi sono stati acquistati; provenienze "prestigiose" che servivano ad aumentare il prezzo dell'oggetto, o a stornare le indagini dal luogo dove avvenivano gli scavi clandestini. L'estate scorsa ho avuto una discussione con Jastrow per un busto di Settimio Severo conservato al Louvre: provenienza ufficiale Ercolano! Figurati! Nel frattempo grazie alle nostre discussioni il Louvre ha corretto la relativa scheda su internet. Sarei felice se mi puoi indicare un link dove fare ulteriori ricerche sui vasi incriminati. Ciao! --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Un piccolo tassello di verità si aggiunge... almeno per un paio di quei vasi. Il luogo di rinvenimento dovrebbe essere Calvi (in prov. di Benevento) e non Calvi (in prov. di Caserta), dove è vero che hanno prodotto numerosissime ceramiche a vernice nera e terrecotte votive e artistiche come questi esemplari, ma non certo nello stile e con l'argilla chiara della Daunia. Calvi (BN) si trova anche essa allo sbocco di vie interne che portano in Puglia, e per altro vi passa la via Appia antica. Allora, anche se non ho rintracciato notizie di ritrovamenti archeologici in quella zona, comunque potrebbe essere verosimile... Chissà. Ho creato la categoria del comune e ci ho messo i due vasi del BM. Resta il mistero di Cuma, che ho visto dal link da te indicatomi, è una provenienza che viene data anche ad almeno un altro vaso canosino... Màh...?! Salutoni, --DenghiùComm 16:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attenzione doppia votazione[edit]

Ti volevo segnalare che hai fatto il mio stesso errore. Infatti ho visto il tuo voto in due immagini a cui avevo dato anche il mio voto ma in questa fase è possibile votare per una sola immagine. ciao Assianir (talk) 11:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Medici treasure in Moscow[edit]

Hi, dear Sailko. I would like to have your opinion. I remember you had here problems with photos from Italian museums, and a lot of sculpture photos were deleted. It is because of museum's copyright claims, isn't it? Now we have a nice exhibition from Florence, here, in Moscow, and I've made some pictures. The shooting was permitted at vernisage. Do you think will be some threat for such files? (By the way, there is an interesting exhibition of Russian treasures in Pitti palace, you can visit it). Shakko (talk) 09:14, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

oh, great, so I will upload it! And prey not to have problems. Surely, I'll be VERY happy to meet you here in Moscow and show everything interesting in the city you wants to see.Shakko (talk) 12:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I meant this one exhibition in Pitti that will be opened today. No Kandinsky, only ancient jewellery. Maybe it will be interesting for you. Shakko (talk) 07:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

answer[edit]

Hi! I've send you e-mail, check wiki-mail, please. --Shakko (talk) 17:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sant'Antonio o San Benedetto?[edit]

Ciao, l'immagine File:Convento di sant'antonio2.JPG ha nel nome Sant'Antonio e nella descrizione San Benedetto... qual è la verità? - Laurentius (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allora metto un po' di {{rename}} nelle immagini di Category:San Benedetto (Pisa). - Laurentius (talk) 15:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ocio alle categorie![edit]

Ciao Sailko! Ti ringrazio per questo, ma stai attento quando fai 'sto genere di cose, perché meglio una categoria più generica che una sbagliata: ad esempio questo l'ho corretto così. Perdonami, ma sono puntiglioso come molti di quelli che passano da ingegneria, e sto con una storica dell'arte ;) -- Massic80 Contattami 12:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, te la sei presa? Guarda che scherzavo! ;) No, già la mia morosa mi fucila per il tempo che perdo su Commons e Wikipedia... non oso chiederle ciò che suggerisci tu ;)
Per quanto riguarda la en:Madonna della seggiola, visto che su Wikipedia inglese si chiama così pensavo che la categoria fosse ancora da creare, e in italiano... per esempio, la Category:Aldobrandini Madonna non c'era ancora, e l'ho chiamata come la rispettiva voce su Wikipedia inglese: en:Aldobrandini Madonna. 'notte e buon lavoro! -- Massic80 Contattami 23:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May I use your rabbit in the moon photo in my children's book?[edit]

Dear Sailko, I am self-publishing a children's book about different countries of the world called "Australia to Zimbabwe: a Rhyming Romp Around the World to 24 Countries". I would like to use your image on the "C is for China" page. It would be fairly small as there are about 25 photos on the two page spread. But, it is the perfect illustration of how to see the rabbit in the moon! There is a verse from the China poem about their discoveries and inventions: "Matches, china, tea and fireworks going boom/ And don't forget they first found the rabbit in the moon." May sound silly but it works in the wider poem.

My book will be published in August 2012 in the United States and the intent is to help American kids learn more about other countries. I will print about 2000 copies, but if it is miraculously successful, I would of course print more. I will be selling it, not giving it away, though at this point I'm just hoping to make back the printing costs.

If you are willing to let me use your image, please let me know how you would like to be credited.

Thank you for considering my request.

Rubirubiru

Will not be using CC-SA license- may I still use your image?[edit]

Dear Sailko,

Perhaps I do not fully understand the CC-SA license, but it seems to say that any derivative work (i.e. my book) would have to also use the CC-SA license. However, after years of work, I do not plan on giving my book away, I want to maintain the copyright. I will of course credit the photo to you and say I got it from Wikimedia commons, so that anyone using the book can also find the image for themselves. I will not be selling the image, but I will be selling the book. My understanding from CC-SA is that will be o.k. only if I have your explicit permission.

So do I have your permission to use the image in my book beyond the restrictions of the license? Again, I will only be using it in my book, not for any other commercial purpose.

Sorry if I am just confused about how this works.

Thanks for your help!

Rubirubiru

Category:Pyramid in Catherine park of Tsarskoe Selo[edit]

By the way, it is the grave of Catherine II's favorite Italian Greyhound Zemire who was quite famous in art and poetry. --Shakko (talk) 16:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I'm watching that you are uploading those days and I'm glad to have so many new Russian photos here. It's a real treasure! Yes, with Hermitage the situation isn't quite good - that is because I'm not living in Petersburg :) About Catherine - we had counted her men for choosen list - you know, only 21 name is known, including 2 husbands - no more than common woman may have. Other is black PR, as historians says. Shakko (talk) 15:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SMN_Cappella_dei_Papi,_Pontormo,_Veronica3.JPG[edit]

File:SMN_Cappella_dei_Papi,_Pontormo,_Veronica3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jarekt (talk) 18:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hi, I would like to use one of your photos (File:Andrea_di_bonaiuto,_cappellone_degli_spagnoli_09.jpg) for an article in Studi Ispanici (the article is about a chapter in a 15th-cent literary work, but in the work a character meets Music and sees painting on her walls). I believe it is permitted to use the photo under Public Domain, but would feel better (and I believe the editors would too) if I had your permission. Many thanks, mh

You can use it, you just have to follow the instructions of the licence and do not change it. Sailko (talk) 13:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Italian Museum question[edit]

Hi, During bot upload of WGA images, my bot created many Institution template stubs and added images to many not-yet-created categories. See for example any stub in Category:Institution template stubs without home category‎. I occasionally try to connect those templates and categories to existing category structure, however I often and up looking up institutions about which all the info is in some language I do not know. There is especially large number of Italian institutions needing to be merged into commons structure, (see User:Jarekt/Institution Stubs and sort by the city). I thought may be you can help me with some more confusing ones. For example: is Institution:Museo Nazionale di Palazzo Mansi, Lucca and Institution:Museo e Pinacoteca Nazionale di Palazzo Mansi, Lucca related to Category:Villa Mansi or some existing category in Category:Museums in Lucca? --Jarekt (talk) 16:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per conoscenza[edit]

Ti lascio questo link esterno che parla della chiesa in questione. IMHO non è corretto infilare il nome di una frazione solo per assonanza, semmai la pala descritta da te dovrebbe essere categorizzata in una Category:Santa Cristina (Santa Cristina, Quinto di Treviso)‎ - Interior e cat correlate sperando che ci sia chi carica foto della chiesa attuale e, chissà, anche di quella demolita. Se non hai pazienza di farlo tu vedo di pensarci io.--Threecharlie (talk) 19:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Il problema nasce perché molte località italiane, frazioni e comuni, portano il nome della parrocchiale che ne è stato nel tempo motivo di aggregazione abitativa. Ad esempio, nel caso di Category:Sant'Apollinare (Rovigo), frazione della città dove abito, il toponimo del paese è cambiato nel tempo ed ha assunto quel nome (se non ricordo male) solo nel primo ottocento, così per distinguere la chiesa dal paese ho adottato lo schema di Dell'Orto affinato da Denghiù: se si legge nel nomefile e nella categoria una doppia indicazione del santo patrono si è sicuri di trovarsi di fronte ad una chiesa, bypassando il problema di sapere se è chiesa, chiesa parrocchiale, oratorio, cappella gentilizia, duomo, cattedrale, chiesa madre e chi più ne ha più ne metta. Se poi, come recentemente abbiamo discusso su quello di Ferrara, l'edificio religioso è un complesso allora meglio definirlo come monastero o abbazia e, naturalmente, la chiesa che ne fa parte viene nominata di conseguenza. Tuttavia vi sono spesso casi, soprattutto in edificazioni recenti che il titolo (o se preferisci santo patrono) rimanga alla sola chiesa e non a tutto il complesso monastico, così che il Category:Convento dei Frati Minori Cappuccini (Rovigo) include anche Category:San Lorenzo da Brindisi Superiore (Rovigo). Spero di non averti fatto perdere la pazienza :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 19:53, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statua_contrada_della_torre.JPG[edit]

File:Statua_contrada_della_torre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Elitre (talk) 08:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Main building of Moscow State University, night light show.JPG[edit]

It is St. Basil, definitely. --Shakko (talk) 21:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Sailko,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Though the collection of images for the contest has been completed (as we informed you previously), the organizers of the contest "Wikipedia loves Petersburg" are glad to update you on the current course of events.

Our jury is working hard; on November, 1 it will declare the winners and the recipients of special prizes. We ask those of you who have not yet set up an e-mail address to do it at user preferences page so that the jury could contact the participants of the contest and to hand out the awards. The winners of the European-wide Wiki Loves Monuments competition will be announced later, in mid-November.

Already on November 2 in St. Petersburg, the Art-hotel "Rachmaninov", located on 5, Kazanskaya St., will open an exhibition of works by the participants of the contest. We inform you about the opening time via the website http://wikilovesmonuments.ru/

If you have any questions or need help with Wikimedia Commons, you can contact user kaganer. You can ask any questions about the contest by sending an e-mail to info@wikimedia.ru

Thank you again for your participation!.

Размещено автоматически; РобоСтася (talk) 13:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Rotate[edit]

Hi Sailko! Please have a look here - you requested rotation but the image was alrady right. There is also a text advising to purge if the image is correctly displayed in the added rotation request. It should also have been correct in the pop-up with 0° (no rotation), wasn't it? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 23:59, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assure last night it looked turned. This problem with the exif infos is really a mess! --Sailko (talk) 06:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. :-) Yes, it looked turned until I hit the purge link in the rotation template. This was happening because the image was an old upload which would have needed rotation. With the new EXIF-based rotation it doesn't - but the thumbnails in the server caches were old ones→ purge needed. The English and German version (not more translated) of the rotate template (which is added by the rotate script) also contain this text:
"If the thumbnail on the right side is in the correct orientation please just purge this image (maybe refresh your browser cache) and remove this template."
Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 10:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

difficoltà per il copyright[edit]

ciao Sailko, mi rivolgo a te perché vedo che sei l'autore delle foto in commons sulla chiesa di Sant'Alessandro a Lucca. Anch'io vorrei caricare foto e disegni relativi alla chiesa, ma al primo tentativo fatto rischio di far cancellare ogni cosa. Potresti suggerirmi un metodo semplice per far accettare le foto che propongo in commons? Si tratta di foto scattate da me in passato (di cui ho sia le stampe che i negativi) e che in parte sono state da me pubblicate in un libro citato nella bibliografia della scheda sulla chiesa (Tradizione tardoantica...). Ti sarei grato se tu potessi darmi qualche suggerimento per superare queste difficoltà. Grazie.--Triktrak 16:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermitage, cancello, aquila imperiale.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine. --Vassil 16:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia loves Petersburg" contest results are summed up[edit]

On November, 1 the winners of the contest "Wiki Loves Monuments" were announced.

It was difficult to select the winners. More than 450 users participated in the contest, having uploaded more than 4400 photographs. The Organizing Committee thanks everybody who took part, tried their hands, and agreed to make their work available to the whole world. There is fascinating work ahead of Wikipedia users: To employ the images to illustrate the articles in Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia which is available in 270 languages.

Do not get upset if you have not won. Look into Wikipedia articles - you may soon find your work there, to help people to visualise the buildings you have taken photographs of. Besides, we will contact you to hand you in a souvenir to recognize your particiation. We hope you will accept this sign of our gratitude.

If you have a chance, you can visit the exhibition of photographs, which has been organized in Saint Petersburg and shows some of the photographs submitted to the contest.

We hope you will participate in the future competitions planned by Wikimedia RU and thank you for your contribution.

You can ask any questions about the contest by sending an e-mail to info@wikimedia.ru.

Sincerely,
In the name of the Organizing Committee,
Lvova Anastasia.

Размещено автоматически ботом РобоСтася (talk) 08:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Italian term[edit]

Hello my dear Sailko! Can you help as to understand one Italian art term? In this text about Lady with the Ermine is written about some spolvere. What exactly technic it is? We are trying to translate it to Russian right. --Shakko (talk) 18:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much.--Shakko (talk) 17:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Sant'Alessandro Lucca[edit]

ciao Sailko, prima di tutto grazie per avermi risposto e per i suggerimenti. Alla fine sono riuscito a caricare un primo lotto di immagini della chiesa di Sant'Alessandro su Commons. La mia intenzione sarebbe di trasferirle poi in modo organico in una galleria fotografica sulla pagina di wikipedia dedicata alla chiesa. Se vuoi dare un'occhiate mi farebbe piacere ricevere un tuo parere. Da ultimo vorrei ampliare anche la pagina su wikipedia con due paragrafi sulla simbologia dei materiali impiegati e sul problema storico artistico rappresentato dal Sant'Alessandro, che essendo un unicum per il suo classicismo fuori del tempo non ha ancora una chiara collocazione ed è un'architettura enigmatica da diversi punti di vista. Colgo l'occasione per chiederti se posso modificare le didascalie che hai apposto alle foto inserite da te, in modo da avere una pagina più unitaria e più completa dal punto di vista informativo. A presto allora, ciao Triktrak/Gpcarrai --Triktrak (talk)

Uffizii Room 1o-14/ Category:Ingesuati Sacred Conversation" + Judith Holofernes[edit]

Ingesuati Sacred Conversation:The first 4 pictures are not in this room/Judith Holofernes: here are 2 pictures not in this room http://www.googleartproject.com/museums/uffizi Please can you fix it

File:Piero del Pollaiolo - Charity - WGA18051.jpg[edit]

The sides must be changed

Again Uffizii Room 1o-14/ Category:Ingesuati Sacred Conversation"[edit]

Hi Saiko,

if you go to the page of Ingesuati sacred Conversation http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ingesuati_Sacred_Conversation, the first 4 pictures are wrong, please check, thank youOursana (talk) 20:09, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again Uffizii Room 1o-14/ Category:Judith and Holofernes (Botticelli)[edit]

Now I saw it thank you, but there is still 3 times a wrong picture from Rijksmuseum Judith Leaving the Tent of Holofernes. The Problem seems to be the linked categories. Thanks for your help.Oursana (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Category:Paintings in the Uffizi Gallery - Room 9, Pollaiolo's"[edit]

I deleted already some categories of wrong pictures, there are still some wrong pictures of Jacopo Sellaio and the first charity still must be change, flame must be on the left sideOursana (talk) 20:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ru:Файл:Ugolino della Gherardesca by Francesco Mallegni forenistic.JPG[edit]

Hello, my dear. Listen, I have an idea I want to share and get help from you. Last year I find the Russian scientist who did Forensic facial reconstruction of Russian tsarinas, etc. - basing on the skulls. And he wrote the OTRS for wiki. And there is another one in Italy, he did Ugolino (see subject of topic - I've uploaded it as fairuse), Dante and other sweet persons. His name is Francesco Mallegni, there is an article about him[1], and other publications in Google. It seems he is not opposite of PR. I think it will be great to write him e-mail to ask him same permission. I found empty page of facebook[2] and page on the University site[3]. Can you try to write? (I think, your Italian will be better for understanding than my Russian-English). My method for asking not PD pictures from living people is like this: "Hello, there is an article we did about you, dear sir, in Italian Wikipedia - it:Francesco Mallegni. Can you check the facts? By the way, can you give us permission for photos? Your Russian colleges already did it". (I believe he is сosa mettere? And Russians scientist simply in this subject are famous, it can help psychological). So, what you think? --Shakko (talk) 11:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sant'Alessandro Lucca (2)[edit]

Ciao Sailko, dato che nel tuo ultimo messaggio sembravi interessato all'argomento, ti volevo avvertire che ho finito di sistemare la voce sulla chiesa di Sant'Alessandro (anche se ho ancora dei problemi nel trasferirvi foto da Commons), e ho scritto le didascalie delle tue foto. Se vuoi dare un'occhiata sarei felice di avere una tua opinione. A risentirci Triktrak/Gpcarrai --Triktrak (talk)

Affreschi pompeiani[edit]

Ciao Sailko. Prima di tutto auguroni per questo 2011 ! Senti, tu hai caricato tre immagini di affreschi vesuviani nel Miho Museum, tra cui File:Pannello di pittura parietale da area vesuviana, miho museum, shiga 02.jpg. Ti ricordi se questi affreschi appartengono al Miho Museum o erano lì solo per una mostra temporanea, quindi un prestito italiano? Ti sarei grato se mi potessi dare questa informazione, di modo che le categorie loro assegnate siano poi veramente corrette. Io ho cambiato loro una categoria, ma ora mi sorge un dubbio se ho fatto bene... Grazie infinite! Ciao. --DenghiùComm (talk) 00:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie. Allora la cat che avevo cambiato è quella corretta. Ciao. --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Judith and Holofernes (Botticelli)[edit]

subcategory of "Category:Paintings in the Uffizi Gallery - Room 9, Pollaiolo's" Ciao Sailko. I'd like to ask you not to use the "Rijksmuseum" as subcategory any longer, better in my opinion is to use it as a link. Thank you --Oursana (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arnold böcklin, orlando furioso, 1901, 02.JPG etc.[edit]

Hi Sailko, I noticed that you have licensed three of these photographs with a Creative Commons license. However, these do only show the original artwork by Böcklin which is in the public domain. There's an official position by the Wikimedia Foundation that photographs of two-dimensional artwork are automatically in the public domain where the copyright term of the object itself has expired, regardless of the photographer (Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag). So I'd like to ask you to relicense those files where you don't show the frame or the wall around the paintings with {{PD-old-100}}. Regards, De728631 (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie, Sailko. I'm going to adjust the licenses. De728631 (talk) 21:09, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tiepolos in Strasbourg[edit]

Hello Sailko. I would like to upload reproductions of the two Tiepolos (father and son) of the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Strasbourg, both of them quite pretty. Unfortunately, the only versions that can be found on the net are unbelievably small (http://www.musees.strasbourg.eu/index.php?page=XVIIIe-siecle). If you have some book in which larger photos can be found, it would be very nice and gentile to scan them for us. Mille grazie! --Edelseider (talk) 09:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one already: File:Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo, La Vierge en gloire avec saint Laurent et saint François de Paule.jpg. Ciao, --Edelseider (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And here is another one: File:Giovanni Battista Tiepolo, Zéphyr et Flore.jpg. Ciao, --Edelseider (talk) 20:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Category:Frari triptych by Bartolomeo Vivarini"[edit]

Hi Sailko, please check this category. The two trittico di Vivarini e Bellini are mixed together in one category. Please can you check this. Thank you23:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Oursana meanwhile i fixed it (talk)00:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Oursana (talk)[reply]

"category:Adoration of the Magi (c. 1500–1510) by Andrea della Robbia"[edit]

Hi Sailko, I do not see, what church of of Saint Andrew has to do with this category?? Perhaps you can explain this. Thank you.Oursana (talk) 15:05, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Jewellery" (or jewelery)[edit]

Hi Sailko - Please note that in English, unlike French & maybe other languages, "jewellery" only means stuff you carry on your body or clothes for adornment. Large metal plates, chalices, forks etc etc are "metalwork" or "silverware" if silver, and so on. The categories should be "metalwork" for most stuff. Thanks - hope you are well. I am trying to clean these categories up, slowly. Johnbod (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Being English, I go for "jewellery", but some cats use the American. I've just done Category:Metalwork in the Cabinet des médailles, Paris, with the Jewellery as a sub-cat, & so on. Johnbod (talk) 16:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Monza and Brianza[edit]

Ciao posso chiederti gentilmente una cosa. Per caso conosci l'user Idéfix perchè devo chiedergli se riesce a modificare una mappa creata da lui! Nel caso contrario, riusciresti a modificare una cartina? Grazie mille .--Simonemb (talk) 16:59, 30 April 2012 (CEST)

File:Guido reni, san giuseppe col bambin gesù.JPG - question about frame[edit]

Hi Sailko, is your photo of this painting taken in Hermitage?

I'm very impressed of this painting and I'd like to order print on canvas in Hermitage. I forgot how looks the frame, but I'd like to suit similar, so this is cause of my question :) Krzysiek9228 (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domenico ghirlandaio, chiamata degli apostoli 03.jpg[edit]

Hi Sailko, this Detail from WGA had been uploaded before, you used the better template. Could you arrange the deletion of one??Oursana (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using several of your pictures in a textbook[edit]

I would like to include 13 of your pictures in a textbook (they show each at about 5 cm high, in a rather large illustrations appendix, with some comment and the credits in the legend immediately below). This being text, would you still want them to be credited to 'Wikimedia:Sailko'? I could also/alternatively add a real name, location, etc. I can also be contacted at thechabon a a a t hot mail d o o t com.

Thanks very much for uploading those great pictures.

[I thought I had written to you some time ago, but can't find any record. Sorry if I screwed up somewhere and this is a repeat message.]

Iiiiaaaa (talk) 14:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So they are actually twelve.

Category:Oratorio di San Giorgio (Padua)[edit]

Hi Sailko, I removed the link to Category:Bonifacio Lupi as it was commissioned by Raimondino de Lupi, a relative of Bonifacio, http://www.padovanet.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=9210. SalutiOursana (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Musei & divieti[edit]

Ti segnalo Commons:Bar_italiano#Impossibile_pubblicare_opere_dei_musei_civici_di_Verona.3F.--Trixt (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosso fiorentino, ritratto di giovane seduto con tappetoi.jpg/permission tag[edit]

Hi Sailko, why don't you use this tag: PD-Art|PD-old-100 ?? Oursana (talk) 09:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC) I was still editing "100", which includes public domain in the USA. Please check History of above mentioned file with my edit. You can see the difference there.Oursana (talk) 09:34, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chiostro dei voti, franciabigio, natività della vergine.jpg[edit]

Please check. I think you named the wrong file.Oursana (talk) 09:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC) O.K. It is not only the wrong filename. File Chiostro dei voti, franciabigio, natività della vergine.jpg is missing and "Betrothal" is uploaded 2 times with wrong and correct name, so the file with the wrong name should be deleted as duplicate. Oursana (talk) 10:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why?[edit]

Hello Sailko,

why did you create a duplicate by uploading File:Neckarsulm StDionysius Carlo Ceresa.JPG? If there is something wrong with the image description, please correct it, and if there is something wrong with the file name, please use the File renaming process, but please DO NOT simply upload a duplicate! Also if there is something wrong with either image name or description, please comment on it when editing so other will know why you did it.

So, once again the question: Why did you upload a duplicate? Regards --Rosenzweig τ 16:47, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

copied from User talk:Rosenzweig

The filemane was wrong, so I renamed it and reuploaded. This is the way I know to do it, sorry!! There was an article in an italian newspaper about the mistake of this picture, we were quite embarassed in it.wikipedia, so we had to correct it quickly! Here and here. You should be a little more careful before spreading your image in something like 10 wikipedia, saying it is by a painting by an artist that was actually 8 years old in 1581. So I think the most important thing was correcting the mistake quickly, I am sorry if I somehow ruined your stats, but if you want, for revenge, you can re-upload one of my 30k pictures, so we will be ok? Sorry again. --Sailko (talk) 20:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

end of copy

Thank you for your answer. You did this the wrong way. It's like I wrote: If there is something wrong with the image description, please correct it (by editing it), and if there is something wrong with the file name, please use the File renaming process, but please DO NOT upload a duplicate. If it is urgent, find an admin at the administrators' noticeboard, a filemover (List of filemovers), ask for help at the Village pump, at it.wp or elsewhere, but still do not upload a duplicate and then try to have the original file deleted as a "duplicate", that's the wrong way to do it. This is not about "somehow ruining my stats" (I did not upload that file), but simply about preserving the proper file history and all versions. Your duplicate omitted the first, original and unedited version of the photograph, for example. I have now deleted your duplicate and moved the original file to the new filename proposed by you, and I have also corrected the description citing that newspaper article, so everything should be in order now.
As I said, I did not upload that image, nor did I write the wikipedia article about the church it is in. I had a look at the guide book for the Neckarsulm churches, however, and in there the image is indeed stated to be from 1581 and by Crespi, who is said there to be born in 1557. That birth year seems to be wrong, but when you look at the way it is presented there, a 1581 painting from a painter born in 1557 seems not to be too outlandish. At least it sounds better than a 1581 painting from a painter born in 1609, which is what is now stated in several articles after your edits. It seems a more solid source than that newspaper article is needed. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 21:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked further, and in the official book about the history of Neckarsulm (Neckarsulm. Die Geschichte einer Stadt, 1992), that painting is also stated to be by Crespi, twice, but without mentioning a year. So the people who uploaded the image and wrote the article are hardly to blame, they merely wrote what is printed in the books. I'd be rather interested in how the author of that newspaper article determined the painting to be by someone else. He does not say how, merely states it as fact. --Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reupload[edit]

Ciao Sailko. Ti sei accorto di questo ? Saluti, --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Giardino dei Semplici[edit]

Greetings Sailko Do you have any photos of the green-houses like this [4] but containing cycads (an important collection at Giardino dei Semplici )? .I lost my own.Notafly (talk) 20:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is very kind of you.I will do that. All I know is that on my visit to this very famous garden three years ago an American lady interested in botany told me that the cycad collection in Florence is very important. I will try and find out why.Best regards from Ireland Notafly (talk) 20:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is because many of the cycads and palms were collected by Odoardo Beccari [5].I will now try and get a listNotafly (talk) 07:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Fiora[edit]

Alors on se promène à Santa-Fiora (nous y serons cette année plus tard : entre le 1er et le 15 août !) ? --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 10:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For Il Barilotto : We're not there yet gone since 2008! Is it expensive and do we eat well?

File:Pietro lorenzetti, crocifisso di cortona.jpg[edit]

Im not sure if this even worth tagging as {{Non-free frame}} or directly as a copyright violation. Im realy not sure why you claim that this is an 2D object. --Martin H. (talk) 19:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With your upload you accertain that "This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art". Is it?? No, it is not. So dont say such wrong things. We have a clear policy, COM:PD-Art, scans or photos of e.g. coins are not allowed, and this is not so much different. In fact you claim that this is covered by Bridgeman vs Corel which it is clearly not. --Martin H. (talk) 20:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
P.s.: and "the frame is deminimia" is nonsense. We not talk about the copyright on the frame design. We talk about the photographers copyright. And for copyright in a photographic work it is very unimportant how large or how significant the object is, only the act of making a photo (of an 3D object) matters. You abuse COM:ART, stop this. --Martin H. (talk) 20:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Its not that I can crop it... we must crop it because the claim "this is 2D" is simply the untruth and the policy COM:ART not covers it, although it is claimed by you that the policy covers it. I think you not see the problem, right? I fear you not see how problematic it is having an expirienced user on Commons whos uploads contain very little information, and the description they contain is not even true and legaly problematic. --Martin H. (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously you not care. Thats a lazy excuse for you but problem for the project. 3D is 3D, there is nothing to discuss. Claiming that 3D is 2D is factually wrong. 3D not falls under Bridgeman v. Corel, you cant claim that it does. Especially not from your Italian perspective. In Italy this photographic reproduction is 100% protected for twenty years no matter the object is 2D or 3D, see Commons:Reuse_of_PD-Art_photographs#Italy. In the US this 100% is protected because it is 3D and the exemption of Brdgeman v. Corel not applies according to the General Counsel. So I dont see how you can speak of problems that not exist. --Martin H. (talk) 20:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Boltraffio[edit]

Salve, Sailko, please see [6] and [7], this is very interesting. Of course, I moved the files you uploaded accordingly. Cheers, --Edelseider (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, they never ever moved from Strasbourg since Bode bought them, but I may be wrong. Usually, when a work is on loan abroad, the museum's website mentions it. --Edelseider (talk) 13:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great news[edit]

And it is me again. Please have a look at Category:Italian paintings in the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Strasbourg. As you can see, it has expanded a lot in the last few months - isn't that wonderful? Cheers, --Edelseider (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

G'Day![edit]

Torre Chigi, San Gimignano

Here's two of your pics, Photoshopped into one!

Amandajm (talk) 09:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Glad to catch you online! I'm just working on the San Gimignano articles and tracking down pics. Just finished writing the article on the Collegiate Church of San Gimignano [8]. Now, you wouldn't have managed to sneak a nice picture of that wonderful interior, with all the black and white stripy aches and blazing blue starry vault, would you?

Amandajm (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No shooting! Well, I know that! But it doesn't necessarily mean that you didn't, does it?
Amandajm (talk) 14:05, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grassimuseum, Leipzig[edit]

Dear Sailko, I would like to use one of your photos (Grassimuseum in Leipzig) in a printed Image Book. What should I exactly write next to the photo? Thanks a lot. With kind regards, Mrs Uthe

The licence and my nick and/or name, Francesco Bini. Can I please know which image? Thank you! --Sailko (talk) 12:41, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! The image I want to use is http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grassimuseum,_03.JPG?uselang=de

Cigoli Progetto di facciata dell'accademia del disegno[edit]

Dear Sailko

I am a graduate student in London and am currently writing a paper about Cigoli. I have tried to do some research about this facade which you kindly uploaded an image of, but have struggled to find anything about it. Do you remember which museum the object is held in? I assume that it was never built? There is no mention of it on the website for the Accademia Del Disegno Florence.

It's only a very small issue in my paper but I would love to know more if you could help in any way.

Very best Sarah

Dear Sarah, if look at the categories of the image you can spot where the work is kept, in the Museo dell'Opera del Duomo in Florence ;) The project was never built and it came with others by more Florentine artist of the time, during a contest. Can you read some Italian? I wrote about the contest in this page in it.wikipedia: it:Facciata_di_Santa_Maria_del_Fiore#Demolizione_e_nuovi_progetti. For further reading I sugget the book "AA.VV., Il museo dell'Opera del Duomo a Firenze, Mandragora, Firenze 2000. ISBN 88-85957-58-7", after that you can get more bibliography. You can also get in touch with the museum, I am sure they will help you too. Let me know, ciao!
Francesco --Sailko (talk) 08:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great thank you very much. Very kind. Sarah

File:Antonio lombardo, filocrate sull'isola di lemno.jpg[edit]

Hi Sailko, you uploaded the above file a while ago with a {{PermissionOTRS}} template, but didn't specify a ticket number (the one later specified is invalid) or a license. I don't suppose you remember or could find the ticket number (it would be 16 digits, starting with a date in ISO format, like 2012100200000001)? If not, can you remember any details about the ticket, like the email address of the sender (feel free to email me if you don't want to post it publicly)? I need to be able to find the ticket so I can find out which license the copyright holder wants to use. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:04, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Giardino_dei_Semplici_di_Firenze_-_Dynosaurs_exhibiton_(2012)[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Giardino_dei_Semplici_di_Firenze_-_Dynosaurs_exhibiton_(2012) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 20:49, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

Hello! This is Enrique Marín, From México, i work as a editorial coordinator form gallery Terreno Baldio Arte (www.terrenobaldio.com) We are the official representatives of artist Javier Marin, do you know him? (www.javiermarin.com.mx) hope yes. Ok i write you because we are making a new book about his work, and there are many people writing about it, one of the most importan is the Dr. Braunstein, form UNAM , National University in Mexico. He is using some images in his text, there is one (as attachment) that i found in internet that you own, is that true?

So i ask you if you are the owner of this picture, I wonder if you give us permission to use it in the new book, of course with your credit, and of course let me know how much that will be cost. Hope you like Javier Marín work, and hope you like to be part of this. Waiting for reply, regards. Enrique Marín The picture is: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e1/Donatello%2C_maria_maddalena_02.JPG Thank you answer me at: enrique@terrenobaldio.com

Giardino dei semplici Reminder[edit]

Hello again Sailko Are you now able to take photos inside the cycad house at Giardino dei semplici and maybe a few of the other houses including a few exterior shots? Very best regards from Ireland and many thanks for the offer Notafly (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC) Ps. I put a note here [9] Lack of fop in Italy has led to my photos of EUR (Roma) being deleted an I am expecting similar problems for other Italy pics . My own view is that no action should be taken unless an institution or city authority insists. I think this would be a rare event.[reply]

Thankyou for your prompt reply and kindness. You took this picture [10] Near are other plant houses containing cycads [11]. I would like a photograph of the interior of this cycad plant house and any others nearby. If I remember correctly the cycad house is in this building [12] Also I would like a replacement for this photo [13] I hope to use all on the English language page [14] which I will base on the Italian page which uses your other pics. Very best regards again Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problem[edit]

If you look here at Funkmonks comment [15] you may decide not to go ahead. He is right about the law I think. I am less sure that it really has to be interpreted in this way.In one instance I had permission from the artist and in another from the architect but the pics were still deleted.May be worth a try though.

File:64.2 impresa.jpg[edit]

Hi Sailko!

The section title image has something in the center above the pedestal that is somewhat unclear. The object appears somewhat tubular and may be a horn or musical instrument. Can you obtain a clearer image from the source book? Or, maybe just a higher magnification, sharper image of this object. The object appears to be pointed toward the face-like circle on its right.

Thank you in advance for any effort you can make. Marshallsumter (talk) 03:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

Hi, please see there: Commons:Forum#Bildrechte_und_Italien. By the way - You're categorization is very bad. There are for example a lot of ceramics labeled as "etruscan" - but they are not "etruscan", but attic and maybe korinthian. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover[edit]

Hi Sailko. I've given you the filemover right after seeing several valid rename requests and in consideration of your extensive contributions and experience. You're free to continue using rename requests if you'd like; I just wanted to give you the option of moving files on your own. INeverCry 01:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Provenienze geografiche[edit]

Ciao, volevo chiederti a proposito dei due file: File:Arte etrusca di canosa, testa femminile in terracotta imitante ion parte un lekythos, da calvi, 300-275 ac..jpg e File:Arte etrusca di canosa, testa femminile in terracotta imitante un lekythos, da calvi, 325-300 ac..jpg, cosa volevi dire con "da Calvi"? Non credo che significhi che provengono da Calvi in provincia di Benevento, anche se sono state inserite in quella categoria... Fammi sapere! --Decan (talk) 09:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Penso di aver risolto il mistero: uno dei due vasi è descritto qui, e scopro adesso che un sito archeologico etrusco di rilievo è Category:Cales, che sorgeva nei pressi dell'attuale Calvi Risorta, in provincia di Caserta. Cosa c'entri Canosa non mi è del tutto chiaro! In realtà lo stesso sito del British Museum mette questo reperto fra quelli etruschi, ma nella descrizione non dice che è etrusco. --Decan (talk) 08:39, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
For all the photos you've uploaded to Commons. They are all much-beautiful! Barnstar for having given artistic value to other places and buildings that a person would never dream were artistic. MIBAC should give you a prize for showing and why your pictures show much of the Italian artistic heritage. Today I don't want to give you bad news, but the lack of Freedom of Panorama in Italy would make delete many. Hoping I'm wrong, again thanks from me. Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:35, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Però su Commons non siamo in Italia. É solo questo il punto. Per il resto la no-FOP policy di Commons ha portato ad ingenti cancellazioni finora e non sono preoccupato, ma sono preoccupatissimo. Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sicuro che lo vuoi sapere proprio oggi? Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Te l'avevo detto che non dovevi vedere oggi. Ti rovina la vita, lo so. Il fatto che il no-fop si applica anche a interni poiché per le creazione tridimensionali si applica il diritto d'autore italiano 70+1 che coincide con la mancanza di libertà di panorama. Tranquillo comunque che quell'elenco deve essere ancora essere vagliato da altri 5 amministratori. Già ho chiesto ad altri cinque amministratori di vedere un po' che si poteva togliere e infatti qualcosa è stato tolto. Avevo intenzione per vari motivi di redigere questo elenco. Non vorrei cancellarli perché sono foto bellissime, e come già detto ad altri mi viene da piangere a pensarci. Ci stanno anche mie foto, ma legge dice questo. Tra l'altro ho solo applica il caso 1 di 3. Infatti come dici tu anche foto del Colosseo non potrebbero stare. Ho intenzione di presentare la lista alla Wikimedia Foundation per avere un parere, idem da Wikimedia Italia. Questa questione della libertà di panorama si deve risolvere al più presto. O si rispetta o non si rispetta. Infatti non è giusto che alcuni file sono stati cancellati e altri ancora no. O si tengono tutti o non si tengono o si mette per iscritto quali si e quali no. Lo scopo ultimo è fare in modo che si faccia pressione affinché questa legge medioevale vada in soffitta e per questo sono pronto a protestare. Vedi a tal proposito l'immagine a inizio pagina che (in caso di cancellazione) verrebbe applicata ai file cancellati. Detto ciò continuo in questo lavoro sperando in un futuro migliore. :) Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Si hai ragione, ma è pur vero che vale il diritto d'autore per gli oggetti di design quindi mancando libertà di panorama si ragiona con il solo diritto d'autore e quindi sarebbero sempre da cancellare (certo non per il no-fop, ma diritto d'autore), ma visto che la categoria era quella ho messo le immagini insieme indicando il dubbio di chi fosse l'immagine. La fondazione può anche dir di si, ma la legge italiana lo vieta indiscutibilmente. Dal parere di un avvocato di Roma anche con l'autorizzazione l'immagine va contro la legge. Per questi motivi dico che sono preoccupatissimo e che non ci dormo la notte da quando ho scoperto la cosa. Finora gli amministratori italiani non hanno fatto nulla per elencarli, ma è giunto il tempo di dire basta a queste stupide leggi. Spero proprio di passare dalle parole ai fatti. Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
E comunque la fondazione può autorizzarci poiché è quella che eventualmente detiene i diritti, un po' come quando qualche pittore decide di regalarci le foto dei suoi dipinti per wikipedia e un po' come avviene analogamente per i testi. --Sailko (talk) 23:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Finalmente una buona notizia. :) Grazie che me lo hai detto. Ora aggiungo alle eccezioni. Comunque ti andrebbe di darmi una piccola mano a cercarne altri no-FoP da elencare? Te la senti? Ora cancello i file affetti da questa eccezione. Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, immaginavo, proseguo da solo allora. :) Ciao Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the frame from one of your photos[edit]

Regarding this photo of yours,

I have removed the frame and reuploaded it with a PD-Art license here: File:Willem_Claeszoon_Heda,_Natura_morta_con_brocca_d'argento_e_torta,_1645.jpg

If you would not like me to do this to any more of your pictures, please let me know. Thankyou for taking the photo! --Moogsi (talk) 11:54, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's the change of license I was concerned about. Removing the frame makes the image public domain. I was asking if it's ok for me to do this --Moogsi (talk) 12:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vincitore Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2012[edit]

Complimenti :-) --94.38.225.49 16:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,[edit]

Hello,

I wanted to keep you informed of the modifications I made on many photos of Art you imported.

In order to document the pictures, I put your name mention in the "Source" field, like here for instance, and the {{Creator}} template of the Artist in the "Author" field.

I also tried to make a description from the title and moved your License frame in the "license" part of the page, with the convenient {{PD-Art}} license for the painting (for paintings).

I hope you agree with these changes, that are intended to clarify who is the artist, and who made the photo

If you disagree with this, or have suggestions, you can contact me on my discussion page - I don't want to "break" your work, I try to make it even more valuable with easy identification of artworks.

Thank you for your beautiful pictures ! --Hsarrazin (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coins of Louis XI of France[edit]

Hi,

I have renamed "Category:Coins of Louis XI of France" to Category:Louis XI of France on coins since it is more in accordance with the usual naming convention.

Thank you,

Elfix (talk) 13:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't true. The naming convention is X on coins (when X designates a very particular thing). It isn't normal that whole category doesn't respect the usual naming conventions. I've noticed that most of these subcategories you have showed me have been created by the same people: they are therefore not representative of the usual naming conventions for coins on commons. See for example Category:Coins of the Kingdom of Italy‎, Category:Persons on coins‎, Category:Gods on coins‎, Category:Coins of the United Kingdom‎, etc.
I believe all the subcategories should follow that convention since it seems to be more widely applied than Coins of X and is more convenient in practice.
However, I do not understand your first remark about Louis [not being] on every single coin relased during his regn: I only changed the category name, did I do anything else wrong? Elfix (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I now understand the nuance. Sorry for the inconvenience. Elfix (talk) 09:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sailko/Archive_2&oldid=638230137"