User talk:Russavia/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Просьба

Привет ! Не смог бы Ты зделать чтоб эти фотографии [1] [2] я мог исползовать в польской версии "Wikipedia" в новoй стати ? Morus kot (talk) [3] 20:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Church_of_All_Russian_Saints_Croydon.jpg

A present for my Australian admin-promotion twin. --99of9 (talk) 13:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

And another: File:Russian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand office.jpg. --99of9 (talk) 14:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Фотографии с Фликра

Здравствуйте! Не могли бы Вы помечать загружаемые с Фликра фотографии особенной меткой. Вместе с некоторыми другими участниками ВП мы обычно ставим метку "commons.wikimedia.org". Если не ставить метку, возникают дубли. Например, я только что собирался загрузить фотографию русской церкви в Самарканде, которая, как оказалось, на склад уже была загружена. И. Максим (talk) 12:35, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Renaming file

Can you do me a favor? I just realized this image of the Lothrop Mansion is labeled incorrectly. I tagged it for renaming, but it seems there's over 800 other images waiting for the same thing. If you get a chance to move it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Друже ти мабуть білини об`ївся? Розумію;)

Очередняя Просьба

Здравствуй! Зделай пожалуйста чтоб я мог исползовать в польской версии "Wikipedia" это изображерие [4] --Morus kot (talk) 12:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


Фотографии президента РФ с иностранными послами

Большое спасибо, коллега! Очень помогли Ваши подборки, так как других фотографий было просто не найти для бывших послов! ru:Бланшмэзон, Клод, ru:Каде, Жан, ru:Лёфевр де Лабулэ, Станислас Jirnov (talk) 10:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Farc

Thanks for spent a little time with the Farc flag. There are more two copies (here and here). Thanks! --Tonyjeff (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm jolle, and I was the author of the image, that was already published first time in a catalan publication TEN years ago. I have the original vector file. The work is not a derivative artwork, but a original artwork. I draw the image from a photo provided by the direction of FARC-EP before their official visit to Valencia in Catalan Countries. My image is original, but the ones quoted by you are derivations of my work and violations of copyright. As I have registered my right in the Generalitat de Catalunya (autonomous government) I can take legal action if necessary. I have a discussion with Tonyjeff and as he know that WAS WRONG, he used you for delete the images. Firts he say that I violated the copyright; when I give probe that I'ma the author, he say that FARC's flag is owned by a private organization; and when this was refutated, he give you this adresses showing derivative artwork. All for dom't recognize that was wrong. The classical american superb. --88.7.189.220 10:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC).

Очередняя Просьба

Здравствуй! Зделай пожалуйста чтоб я мог исползовать в польской версии "Wikipedia" это изображерие [5]--Morus kot (talk) 18:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

✓[OK] File:Pam Kursk.JPG. --russavia (talk) 04:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Kirill_Fandeev_.JPG

Не нужно в следующий раз удалять этот файл, так как я являюсь правообладателем и получил разрешение OTRS на публикацию. Номер разрешения 2010072910039007 Пожалуйста, проверяйте, прежде, чем удалять. --Spaniel (talk) 17:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Admin inactivity

Hello Russavia, you might be interested in this discussion: Commons_talk:Administrators/De-adminship#Activity -- A9 (talk) 05:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:The_White_House.jpg

File:The_White_House.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 22:08, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Lenin's_mausoleum_2.jpg

File:Lenin's_mausoleum_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 22:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Moscow_-_Lenin's_Mausoleum.jpg

File:Moscow_-_Lenin's_Mausoleum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 22:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedral_of_Christ_the_Saviour_3.jpg

File:Cathedral_of_Christ_the_Saviour_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Cezarika1 (talk) 08:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 11:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 22:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Moscow_State_University_fireworks.jpg

File:Moscow_State_University_fireworks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.62.192.237 19:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sultan_of_Brunei_with_King_of_Malaysia.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sultan_of_Brunei_with_King_of_Malaysia.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sultan_of_Brunei_with_King_of_Malaysia.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 13:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:20, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Leo Mechelin - Albert Edelfelt 1901.jpg

Ouuups! Did not intend to make this full size :-)

Could you please restore File:Leo Mechelin - Albert Edelfelt 1901.jpg. This is {{PD-old-100}} as the artist Albert Edelfelt died in 1905. A photograph of PD work does not constitute copyright. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 15:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi Petri, based upon the information you have given, and after having checked the date of death of the author, this is indeed a PD image, and I have undeleted it, and it is available at File:Leo Mechelin - Albert Edelfelt 1901.jpg. Cheers, --russavia (talk) 15:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 01:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

The Commons Barnstar for Leningradartist

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Russian Embassy, Havana.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

VI

Hi. Something went wrong with your most recent VI nomination. Can you fix or renominate? Lycaon (talk) 23:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Laziness

Hello, Mr. Administrator! I have an admin task for you to perform. If you could kindly gaze in the direction of this image, please? That image is currently not used anywhere, but it was used as an illustration of en:Laziness, and it seems to have been uploaded with the sole purpose of embarrassing the depicted individual. Whoever the poor soul is, his image is (was) being used without an explicit permission and, I am sure, is in violation of multiple defamation guidelines on both the Commons and en.wiki. I have no idea how to go about the deletion (or much else for that matter) on the Commons, so I'm going to "hump" (that's Australian, innit?) this bundle of joy on your responsible shoulders. Cheers and salutations,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?);

Hello Mr Ezhiki, imagine bumping into you in my neck of the woods :) I agree with your reasoning 110% - as there is little to no encyclopaedic purpose to the photo, as is evident in that it is not being used on any projects, the photo IMO serves the purpose of embarrassing the subject. Hence, I have deleted it based upon that reason. If another administrator holds contrary opinion they are welcome to undelete the file, in which case it can then go to discussion. But first and foremost privacy of the person has to be considered. Anything else Ezhiki, let me know. Cheers, --russavia (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks much!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonov An-38.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:Rub5a.jpg

File:Rub5a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Serjio-pt (talk) 11:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Rub5b.jpg

File:Rub5b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Serjio-pt (talk) 11:28, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Nikitskaya.jpg

There is a source problem with File:Nikitskaya.jpg. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 17:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Extra 300.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scarlet Sails.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sukhoi Su-35.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 18:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Russia10rubles04back.jpg

File:Russia10rubles04back.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Serjio-pt (talk) 15:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Russia10rubles04front.jpg

File:Russia10rubles04front.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Serjio-pt (talk) 15:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg

Have you had enough time to copy this to local projects yet? I want to close it as delete. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

government.ru & premier.gov.ru

Приветствую! А вы не могли бы попробовать получить такие же разрешения на government.ru и premier.gov.ru как на {{Kremlin.ru}}? -- TarzanASG +1  12:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

{{Belarus.mid.ru}}

I was working on cleaning up Category:OTRS pending - No timestamp given and found three images that have this tag. The template contains {{OTRS Pending}}. I could not locate any tickets in the OTRS permission queue that contain the text belarus.mid.ru. Has an email been sent to OTRS relative to these three images, or is OTRS Pending in there by mistake?? I looked at the web site to see if it was licensed using CC-BY-3.0 but could not see anything. I don't understand Russian so I'm not surprised. Thanks --Captain-tucker (talk) 08:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

{{PavelAdzhigildaev}}

I have the same question regarding that above template. There are 12 photos that have this template that includes an {{OTRS Pending}}, I could not locate any OTRS ticket in the permissions queue that mentions Pavel Adzhigildaev. Do you have any information on OTRS ticket or email? I did add the OTRS Permission tag to {{YuriyIlyin}} as I did locate a successfully closed OTRS ticket for those images. Thanks--Captain-tucker (talk) 11:29, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Tupolev_TU-160.jpg

File:Tupolev_TU-160.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Knock knock

How's the sunshine? I ran into Category:Embassies in Moscow during my annual maintenance spree (3.500 8.000+ photos for upload, most of them barely legal models in suggestive outfits) and now I'm sort of confused. There are two options:

  • Category:Embassy is included in foreign-rel categories and geographic categories (street or district). Photos in Category:Embassy are included there and only there (geo categorization through Category:Embassy)
  • Category:Embassy is included only in foreign-rel categories. Each photo in Category:Embassy has its own geo categories (street or district).

I'd say don't link embassies to streets (there may be more than one location, or they can change it etc.) - what was your plan?

Another concern: take a look if you would at Category:Ambassador residences in Moscow - what are embassies doing there (sorry, I'm not tracking whereabouts of Messrs. Ambassadors, but I suspect that if the embassy is also the residence, it doesn't need a cat of its own).

All the best and then more, NVO (talk) 21:20, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

File:The_Aeroflot_Building._D._Chechulin._1934.jpg

File:The_Aeroflot_Building._D._Chechulin._1934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 10:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Boris_Yeltsin_19_August_1991-1.jpg

File:Boris_Yeltsin_19_August_1991-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 10:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Russian_Consulate-General_in_Simferopol.jpg

File:Russian_Consulate-General_in_Simferopol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

195.110.6.202 08:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Saudi Arabian Airline HQ Fixed.jpeg

Hey, would you mind e-mailing me "File:Saudi Arabian Airline HQ Fixed.jpeg"?

I would like to see if I can upload it as a fair use file on the English Wikipedia WhisperToMe (talk) 17:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg

Я что-то пропустил? Какая причина удаления?Altoing (talk) 18:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Premier.gov.ru

The Kremlin.ru pictures are available under the CC license, but what about Premier.gov.ru? Have they given permission yet? Thank you for your extremely valuable work in getting image permissions. Offliner (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

government.ru & premier.gov.ru

Приветствую! А вы не могли бы попробовать получить такие же разрешения на government.ru и premier.gov.ru как на {{Kremlin.ru}}? -- TarzanASG +1  20:32, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Почему вы не отвечаете? -- TarzanASG +1  08:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tarzan, I have contacted both government.ru and premier.gov.ru but haven't had much luck with replies from them. I will try contacting again in the coming days, and will let you know if I have any success with them. russavia (talk) 08:45, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

User:DRBot/non-admin#00:19, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, how come your closures are marked as being done by a non-admin? Any idea? –Tryphon☂ 00:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, not too sure why that is. Must be the bot or something that needs to be updated to reflect admin status? That's only reason I can think of? russavia (talk) 08:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Karl-Christoph Kuhn.jpg

Dear Russavia,

I noticed the note of a removed photo in the German wikipedia article de:Karl-Christoph Kuhn.

  • This article had a deletion discussion. It was kept.

I would like to ask you to undelete this photo.

Thank you, Simplicius (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, in regards to this photo, I stand by the deletion as explained at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karl-Christoph Kuhn.jpg. There is no evidence that the uploader is the person in question. For the file to be kept on Commons, the simplest way is for permission to be granted as explained at Commons:OTRS. This way, there would be no reason to delete the file, and it could be used across all Wikimedia projects. Hope this helps. russavia (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Video OGG filetypes

How did you create the File:Russian national anthem at Medvedev inauguration 2008.ogg?--TonyTheTiger (talk) 04:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

I used Windows Media Player to extract the portion of the video that I needed, then I used Super link to convert the resultant .wmv file to .ogg format. Hope this helps? Cheers, russavia (talk) 08:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Russian Centre of Science and Culture in Helsinki

Back in 2009 you requested pictures of the Russian Centre of Science and Culture in Helsinki. It has taken a couple years, but now there are some: Category:Russian Centre of Science and Culture in Helsinki. MKFI (talk) 20:38, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

No OTRS permission

All of the files using Template:GlebOsokin, using Template:Belarus.mid.ru, and using Template:Burundi.mid.ru lack permission and will soon be deleted. Please resend an email and quote the file names in the email, using the instructions seen in the OTRS pending template you placed in that template. – Adrignola talk 20:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Jimbo_advertising_watches.png

File:Jimbo_advertising_watches.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:57, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Consulate-General of Russia in Arbil.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Consulate-General of Russia in Arbil.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

– Adrignola talk 15:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Maumoon-Abdul-Gayoom.jpg

File:Maumoon-Abdul-Gayoom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Armoiries Famille Middleton.png

Hello,

You nominated the file I made a day after I uploaded it, and this: File:Armoiries Famille Middleton.png went unnoticed? Sodacan (talk) 23:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Airbus A380.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:5110-0094-front.gif

File:5110-0094-front.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mmdoogie (talk) 04:16, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Kurmanbek Bakiev with Dmitry Medvedev.jpg

Hello!

Why did you remove the English description of this image? --High Contrast (talk) 17:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC) Hi, it was oversight on my part. Thanks for fixing. russavia (talk) 18:48, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chukotavia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Monarch Planes

Hello. I like the monarch photo. Could you possibly get a pic of G-OZBE, G-MONK and G-EOMA in their current liveries thanks --MKY661 (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Почта

Приветствую! Проверьте, пожалуйста, почту. Я кое-что вам написал и мне бы хотелось, чтобы вы ответили. -- TarzanASG +1  06:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Почему вы не отвечаете? Это важно. -- TarzanASG +1  00:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Putin 22 February 2000-4.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vladimir Putin 22 February 2000-4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Jappalang (talk) 08:21, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Early sketch of Mamayev Kurgan monument.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Early sketch of Mamayev Kurgan monument.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Jappalang (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Vladimir_Putin_22_February_2000-4.jpg

File:Vladimir_Putin_22_February_2000-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jappalang (talk) 13:10, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Lockheed C-5M Super Galaxy, MAKS 2011.jpg

Hello Russavia!

Thanks for this edit! Silly by me, I normally check my upload skript before I submit them. Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 15:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Singapore Airlines Airbus A380 woah!.jpg

Hi, just a note in relation to the move of File:Singapore Airlines Airbus A380 woah!.jpg to File:Singapore Airlines Airbus A380 Takoff.jpg. After reviewing Commons:FR#What_files_should_be_renamed.3F, I can't see any valid reason for the file to be renamed as per the guidelines. However, if there is a truly valid reason for the file to be moved, it doesn't make much sense to have it moved to a name where takeoff is mispelled as takoff. If a rename really is required for the file under policy, I won't object, however correct spellings, etc should be used I would think. I will leave this up to you to decide on how/if to move, etc. russavia (talk) 19:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello Russavia,
Sorry for the mispelling of "takeoff".
I imagine the renaming was requested by someone who thought that the final "woah!" was not accurate. I was agree with him: what is a woah? Is it a part of an Airbus A380 ? Is this a operation of the aircraft? Or is it because you are proud to have made this hard-to-take photograph? In my mind, "takeoff" describe more precisely what the plane is doing, so I've renamed it.
Sémhur (talk) 05:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Category:Russian FOP cases

I just removed this Cat from three of the four images you just put it on -- in all three cases, the issue was not FOP at all -- it was the copyright on the image itself.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Jim, appreciated. I hope that other admins are using the Russian FOP case category on relevant deletions, as the word on the street is that FOP will sooner or later be brought into the Russian laws. The cat will obviously be of some use if and when that happens sometime around 2052, knowing Russian bureaucracy. russavia (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
I certainly hope so, I've deleted images of some beautiful buildings.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Russavia. You have new messages at Dragfyre's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Category:7 Krasnoarmeiskaya street

Там фотографии нескольких домов улицы, поставьте категорию в конкретный дом.--AndreyA (talk) 18:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Fotos de Argentina

Automatic translation: Hello! Where are you from? Russia? To upload photos with an age of 25 years after its first publication date (or photos prior to 1986) can use the license {{PD-AR-Photo}}, always indicating the year and author.

To upload photos of historical sites, buildings, monuments, churches, etc., various licenses, certain licenses may release the copyright, while other can book some copyright. But as long as the photos are of your authorship, or are drawn from Flickr (pictures are provided free or with only some rights reserved). What types of photos you want up? He got the message? The message was translated with Google Translator. Greetings! --Gelpgim - disc 22:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Airliners.net

Hello Russavia!

I have noticed that you have purchase many permissions of airliners.net photographers and that you created a special licence tags with corresponding photographer-categories Category:Photos by XYZ. That's all very well done! My suggestion: I think it would be helpful to create a "central" airliners.net-photographers category in which all airliners-permission are collected. Something like Category:Airliners.net photographers. What do you think? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 00:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm not too sure if an Airliners.net photographers category would be of any use, as all of these photographers are individuals and aren't affiliated with the site. Having a category "Category:Photos from airliners.net" may be of some use, but even then I'm not too sure just how useful it will be. I'll leave that decision up to you. Cheers, russavia (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

airliners.net license templates, problems with OTRS

Please have a look at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#OTRS_for_two_templates --Denniss (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't think that's a photograph

You realize that this isn't a photograph, right [6]? There might be *some* PD license under which this one would fall but neither the 'old' or the 'Poland' one are it. Please find an appropriate license for the image.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Also, per the Speedy Deletion template - "If you disagree with its speedy deletion, change this tag to a regular deletion request using delete and list it on Commons:Deletion requests/Current requests so it can be discussed." - since you're the one disagreeing with the speedy, you should be the one to list it at deletion requests. Can you place it there please? thanks.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Nm, did it myself.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

I have commented there, as it is clearly PD-Poland. russavia (talk) 09:03, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


Hello, Russavia. You have new messages at Andrei Stroe's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Lokomotiv_Yaroslavl_memorial_at_Arena-2000.jpeg

File:Lokomotiv_Yaroslavl_memorial_at_Arena-2000.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:00, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: Poznan hey? Hmmm. :)

Hi Russavia,
what an incredible coincidence! I live a 10 minutes' walk away from the consulate, and I used to go past it very often — but unfortunately I haven't got a working camera at the moment :-(. Anyway, I'll try to get a photo of the consulate as soon as possible; as far as I remember, it's not that easy to photograph as the view is partially blocked by trees and a high fence, but I'll do my best. I'll let you know as soon as I upload the picture to Commons. Thanks for contacting me and have an enjoyable time at Commons! odder (talk) 13:59, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: Photos from Spain

Hello. Here you are the Russian Embassy in Madrid (including a Sputnik :)). At the moment, view is partially blocked by the trees, but I hope that in the wintertime the facade will be more visible, so I'll take more photos then. That's a big building made of marble, and the last embassy inaugurated by the USSR (in 1991).

Sincerely yours, --Zaqarbal (talk) 09:36, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Barcelona

I think Yearofthedragon is the main wikiphotographer from Barcelona. Regards, --Zaqarbal (talk) 00:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Honda HA-420 HondaJet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Про Commons Project

Это, конечно, дело. Два соображения

  • Уже есть Commons:Форум.
  • Между потенциальными участниками слишком много конфликтных пар (не буду тыкать поимённо). Если двое не терпят друг друга, то на новой площадке из них будет только один. И с этим сложно что-либо сделать. NVO (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Recent rename

Hi! I've noted you've rename image Child affected by malnutrition 1921-1923 Famine in Soviet Russia.jpg to the name which allow to use it as described in scholar source [7] Misuse of the 1921-1923 photodocuments (mostly without any captions, or references to sources) to depict the tragedy of 1932-1933 is becoming increasingly popular. Can we start a discussion first - I've provide [8] [9] but my opponents does not suggest any. Thank youJo0doe (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I have renamed the file due to ambiguity as to what it portrays. I am not getting otherwise involved in any discussion on what it portrays. Perhaps ask for outside comment at Commons:Village pump. If any editor disagrees with my move to the non-descript name, they are welcome to move it to another name. Also, if there is truly a dispute as to the accuracy of what the image displays, {{Fact disputed}} can be placed on the image page. If there is conflicting information on what the image portrays, it may be best that it not used until such time as the veracity of claims and counter claims can be established. But that is an issue for editorial discussion on individual projects. This is just some suggestions from where I see it, other than that I am not getting involved. russavia (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
However, I will say this. If the file is believed not to free, you are welcome to open a discussion on it thru the discussion/deletion process. If it is agreed that it is free, it is simply the source and depiction that is disputed, then you and others have to continue discussions on this. If it is believed that the specific copyright is wrong or it is disputed, then {{Disputed}} can be used. Due to edit warring, I have also locked the description page -- discussion needs to continue on the talk page. russavia (talk) 15:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Yak-141 photos

Hello!

I've just read your message at wikiproject Aviation in Russian wikipedia. That's a great proposal! I've checked some of the links and found some images of Yak-141 that we really need. You know it's a great bird but there's less than ten photos of it at commons. Can we use them here? Here's these images:

Also, is there any way to get these images to commons (they're not from your list):

Three of them shows Yak-141 in flight and one shows its take-off. Very rare pics.

Thanks in advance! James R. Nockson (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi James, Adzhigildaev and Ryabtsev photos are free to upload. Simply follow the instructions on my userpage, but using their individual templates. Using the templates will place the correct licencing on the image and will also place the photo in their photographer categories. The other photos you mentions, I have email Javier, I am waiting for a reply. I can contact the other two photographers if you like, and I can let you know of the results. I have an email inbox full of replies at the moment, and I am slowly working thru them all and getting their basic information up on Commons. If you need anything else from me, just ask. Cheers, russavia (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Good, I'll upload them then. About other photos - yes, it will be great if you connect other users, especially Ken Videan. Please, let me know about the results. I'm know making a big and detailed article about Yak-141 at ru-wiki and these photos will really help to illustrate it. Thanks again! James R. Nockson (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Done! Here's files:
I hope I haven't done any mistakes. James R. Nockson (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey James, all good mate. With the photos, you know that we are able to remove the black bar along the bottom of the images? If you do that, just be sure to save it with no compression to preserve the image quality. If not, someone else will surely do it in due course. Other than that, perfect! Feel free to upload any of the images from those links on my userpage, and be sure to let others know that they can use them where we can. I will let you know about the other photographers as well. Oh, and if you ever find a free photo of the Aeroflot Ilyushin Il-28, please get in touch. Yes, they did use them, they used them to fly the Pravda matrixes around the USSR. Anyway, if you have anything else you need, or whatever, let me know. Cheers russavia (talk) 18:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
I've removed them. For some reason one of photos still shows old version with that bar in preview. I'll let you know if ever find a free pic of that aircraft (now I have only photos of Il-28 from Khodynka field in Moscow). Can't wait to hear about results of other requests.
Best regards, James R. Nockson (talk) 18:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
If you CTRL+F5 this will bypass the cache, and the image should reload in the browser. It is showing without the bar hear. If you come across any images with the airliners.net watermark on them, please be sure to add them to the category as written on the talk page. Also, I have just gotten permission for http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?photographersearch=Lars+Söderström no Yak-141s in there, but a lot of history for aviation buffs. Will be in touch. russavia (talk) 18:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Uploaded some other images from your links (awesome source of material!). Sorry for bothering you, but I've got another quetion: I found three images by Sergey Ryabtsev (from your list) - they show historical photos of Yak-36. However in descriptions is said next: "Thanks to mr. Levibor for the upload permission." Can we upload them? Here's links: 1, 2 and 3. James R. Nockson (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
It has been asserted in the OTRS permission that Sergey is the copyright holder of these photos. I would go ahead and upload them, but add Gos. Levibor into the author field, and do the rest as per normal. Any problems, let me know. Cheers, russavia (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Done! I've signed them as "Gos. Levibor (uploaded to airliners.net by Sergey Ryabtsev)". Thanks for help! James R. Nockson (talk) 19:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Russavia/Archive_2&oldid=119524503"