User talk:Rosa Mauro

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rosa Mauro!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quartieri di Genova.png

[edit]

Ciao, bel lavoro, però ti faccio notare che manca San Quirico. Tra le altre cose, allora San Gottardo faceva parte di Staglieno e non di Molassana, Sturla, a ponente del torrente omonimo, era frazione di San Martino, che quindi arrivava fino al mare e il territorio della Foce era molto più piccolo di quanto indicato.--Bbruno 16:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

File:La Domenica del Corriere Viadotto Genova 1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Holapaco77 (talk) 10:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tate murders victims.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tate murders victims.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tate murders.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trio Lescano - Tulipan.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civitas13 (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civitas13 (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salve,

hai proposto di cambiare il nome San-Marino, Scuola Secondaria Superiore, 1.jpeg a „Scuola Secondaria Superiore di San Marino.jpg“, indicando la ragione

  • 2: To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image particularly displays

Devo ammettere che non capisco questa ragione.

  • „meaningless“ vuol dire più o menu „senza significato“. Credo che il significato del tuo nome sia essatamente lo stesso che quello del mio.
  • „ambiguous“ vuol dire „ambiguo“ o „polisenso“. Non lo vedo affatto.

Così credo che la tua proposta sia un' affare di gosto personale, e in questo caso prevale il gosto mio come autore della foto. In Wikimedia Commons, nei miei nomi di media preferisco di mettere l'elemento più generale (San Marino) nel primo luogo.

Chiedo scusa per la qualità del mio italiano ma di solito mi capiscono.

Con stima, Renardo