User talk:Romainbehar/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


File:London - Regent Street - Hamleys, pile of stuffed guinea pigs.jpg

File:London - Regent Street - Hamleys, pile of stuffed guinea pigs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

File:London - Kentish Town Road, Prince plaque.jpg

File:London - Kentish Town Road, Prince plaque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Lyon 8e - Grande mosquée de Lyon - Salle de prière depuis l'entrée.jpg

File:Lyon 8e - Grande mosquée de Lyon - Salle de prière depuis l'entrée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Montchat

Salut Romain,

J'ai finalement été me balader à Montchat pour compléter la carte ! Ce sont donc 127 photos et la carte est toute verte (j'ai filtré pour avoir seulement les rues, mais j'ai aussi fait quelques places, parcs et autres). Prochain objectif, le 5ème arrondissement ! Noé (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


Code issues in User:Romainbehar/common.js

Hi Romainbehar, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Romainbehar/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 2 character 88: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: mw.loader.load('https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-ImageAnnotator.js')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 19:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC).

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, RZuo (talk) 06:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Category:Montée_Pichou_(Marseille)

Category discussion warning

Montée Pichou (Marseille) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Fr.Latreille (talk) 20:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:Centre_hospitalier_de_Chaumont

Category discussion warning

Category:Centre_hospitalier_de_Chaumont has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeurbanne - Rue Richelieu - Château de la Ferrandière - Mur donnant sur la rue.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeurbanne - Avenue Aristide Briand - Depuis la rue Paul Verlaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 18:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 5e - Cimetière de Loyasse - Tombe d'Alexis Chavanne - Médaillon de Selima Ursenbach.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 5e - Cimetière de Loyasse - Tombe de la famille Million-Servier - Ange 02.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please provide geocoding and improve the file description on the file page (in French is fine). -- Ikan Kekek 00:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Done, so  Support, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 13e - Boulevard Saint-Marcel - Passage piéton menant à la rue Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guipavas - Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Paul - Calvaire - Vierge 02.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meyzieu - Place du 11 Novembre 1918 - Croix - Détail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:13, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 21:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Bâtie-Rolland - Montée du Théâtre.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sauzet - Chemin de Ronde - Portail Blanc - Plaque de cocher.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 17:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye - Cimetière - Christ en croix - Détail.JPG

Salut, Ça ressemble plus à une statue qu’à une sculpture non ? Otourly (talk) 18:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Une statue n'est pas une sculpture ? Romainbehar (talk) 19:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Une sculpture est une œuvre sculptée. Là elle m’a l’air d’avoir été fondue.;) Otourly (talk) 16:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Antoine l'Abbaye - Grande Rue - Maison seigneuriale - Relief de la façade.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Antoine l'Abbaye - Grande cour de l'Abbaye - Salon aux Gypseries - Flamme sur le toit 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Antoine l'Abbaye - Abbatiale Saint-Antoine - Statue de saint Vincent de Paul 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye - Abbatiale Saint-Antoine - Collatéral sud - Vitrail de la façade.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye - Maison de l'Abbé - Porte sortant vers l'abbatiale - Fronton - Côté nord.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye - Abbatiale Saint-Antoine - Façade est - Bénitier extérieur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Nazaire-le-Désert - Place du Clédan - Chapelle Saint-Joseph - Statues du clocher - Détail 02.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Prburley 13:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crémieu - Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-la-Salette - Statue au faîte - Buste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 1er - Hôtel de ville de Lyon - Cour haute - Fontaine d'Amphitrite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 18:11, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 1er - Hôtel de ville de Lyon - Cour haute - Fontaine d'Amphitrite 08.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Martin d'Ainay - Intérieur - Vitrail de Sainte Blandine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 5e - Place du Petit Collège - Horloge Charvet - Polichinelle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:10, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 2e - Hôtel-Dieu, cénotaphe de Marcus Panissod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 1er - Place des Terreaux - Hôtel de Ville - Statue d'Hercule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:37, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 3e - Chantier Emergence-Lafayette, vu depuis l'angle Thiers-Lafayette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality to me. I expect someone to object to the wires, because someone almost always does, but the wires are obviously quite intentionally and logically part of the composition, which is meant to show a lot of urban logistics at a crossroads. -- Ikan Kekek 08:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye - Place du Puys - Fontaine - Détail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye - Musée - Vitrail représentant saint Antoine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 07:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Île Barbe - Église Notre-Dame - Côté sud-est.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye - Grande rue - Haut de la porte du Gros Mur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalancon - Maisonnettes le long de la rue principale.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Pol-de-Léon - Parc du Champ de la Rive - Calvaire - Croix sommitale 02.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:53, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Pol-de-Léon - Place de l'Été 1944 - Monument aux déportés et fusillés de Saint-Pol-de-Léon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landerneau - Cimetière - Lanterne des morts - Côté sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye - Abbaye - Cour - Porte 1 - Sculpture de la clé de voûte.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landerneau - Allée Saint-Jean - Portail du cimetière - Relief doré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but tilted --Poco a poco 07:27, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 12e - Boulevard Diderot - Depuis le quai de la Rapée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 5e - Cimetière de Loyasse - Tombe de Gaspard Bruyas - Relief (guirlande de fruits et chouette).jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyon 3e - Église du Sacré-Cœur - Façade sud - Relief du Christ.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Romainbehar/Archive_3&oldid=682087210"