Hi Roland. Are you the same as User:Roland2? Please only use one account. Also, please provide more information on your images, including who made it and what free license it is available under. Thanks. dbenbenn | talk 21:01, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Well, it was so fine my ostrich! the snapshot was taken in south Africa on 2003, september, with an argentic camera; It was a digital version of the negative.Roland2 and Roland45 are the same and unique : IRoland4518:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:B14_50.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand07:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
you haven't well read the text on the top of the page. Except if i mwas mistaken, i had indicated the adress of this governmental site. It's written " "l'état français ne saurait revendiquer de droits au titre de la propriété intellectuelle pour l'utilisation par un tiers de ces signaux." ("French government can't demand any right about the intellectual property for the use by other people of these picture"). That is to say that there is no copyright. Thank's not to delete themRoland4518:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:B43.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand07:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Loiret-2015-canton-Chalette.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Loiret-2015-canton-Chalette.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.
What does that means? The decret is a reglementary texte and then public. The geofra is free too, look at the licenese. And the drawning has been made by myself, such as thousands others. There is no OTRS license to ask. If it is the "own work" that lackes, i add it.Roulex 45 (talk) 04:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Pont Morandi-OSM.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.
If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
The reason given by the user who added this tag is: OpenStreetMap data seems to be licensed under Open Database License (ODbL), with map tiles licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0. In particular, see Template:OpenStreetMap. A simple screenshot without additional creativity from the author/uploader (User:Roland45) claiming the work as {{self}} may not exceed the threshold of originality to be eligible for its own copyright.
Bonjour Roland45, Merci pour la création de File:31-Haute-Garonne-intercos-2019.png.
J'ai quelques correctifs à te proposer, le plus important concerne la CC à l'ouest de Toulouse Métropole qui n'a pas de nom sur la carte (Save et Touch). Je tu suggèrerais aussi d'en changer la couleur car il y a 3 CC/agglo vertes qui se touchent là. Enfin, la position des noms pour Terres du Lauragais (SE de Toulouse) et Cagire etc. (au sud du département), est perfectible. Lucio fr (talk) 11:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Roland45.Il y a plusieurs erreurs sur la carte FR-Régions.svg. Les départements de l'Aube et de la Haute-Marne sont en bleu ciel alors qu'ils devraient être en orange car ils font partie de la région Grand-Est. Les départements du Gers et des Hautes-Pyrénées sont en vert vif alors qu'ils devraient être en vert amande car ils font partie de la région Occitanie. Cordialement, Technob105 (talk) 18:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gael.simon: Bonjour. Merci du compliment. Les cartes des intercos ont élaborées avec le SIG open source (et gratuit) QGis (voir ici) avec les jeux de données suivants :
Pour chacun de ces jeux de données, il convient bien entendu de définir la bonne symbologie (couleurs, symboles, graphismes). Cordialement.Roland45 (talk) 08:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:84-Vaucluse-enclave des papes.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:12007-Ambeyrac-Hydro.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:12024-Belcastel-Hydro.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:12050-Canet-de-Salars-Hydro.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Bonjour Roland,
Je suis en train de réaliser un mémoire de géographie sur l'intercommunalité de la Vallée Dorée (CCLVD) dans l'Oise. Pour des fins d'illustration pouvez-vous me donner l'autorisation d'utiliser votre carte sur les interco de l'Oise ?
Bonjour. Peut-être voulez-vous parler du fichier ci-contre. Il n'y a aucun problème à réutiliser ce fichier. Il est publié sous la licence cc-by-sa-4.0 (voir les conditions d'utilisation), à savoir essentiellement partage à l'identique et attribution de paternité (Roland45, Wikipédia). Si vous avez besoin d'autre cartes du secteur, je peux réfléchir à la question.Roland45 (talk) 08:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]Intercommunalités de l'Oise.Roland45 (talk) 08:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Roland ! Merci pour votre fantastique travail sur les cartes des communes de l'Aveyron, elles sont magnifiques ! Je l'ai ai catégorisées dans Category:SVG maps of Aveyron municipalities et visiblement il en manque 5:
@Don-vip: Merci. Effectivement, il y a 285 communes en Aveyron et bizarrement ces 5 sont manquantes (tout au moins pour le cadastre). Il faut que je vois pourquoi et que je les charge. Cordialement.Roland45 (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:59-AAV2020-Charleroi (partie française).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:02-AAV2020-Vervins.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:80-AAV2020-Amiens.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:45145-Ferrières-en-Gâtinais-Sols.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:45306-La Selle-en-Hermoy-Sols.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:45155-Gien-Sols.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:45275-Saint-Firmin-des-Bois-Sols.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:45280-Saint-Gondon-Sols.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:45134-Épieds-en-Beauce-Sols.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
As far as I can see, none of the files called for in this gallery actually exist. It should therefore be deleted. Please add the files soon or I will delete it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jameslwoodward Hi. It's true. Such as it's too true that I have uploaded more than 20 000 files. And you can imagine than to upload so lot of files, it needs somme organisation. This page (such as some other ones) are pages with which I can see what is uploaded and what is'nt. Then if you wait for few days, this gallery will be entirely filled of files. I don't see where is the urgency to delete this page.Roland45 (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Normally I delete incorrect galleries on sight, so there was no urgency here. It would be good, however, if you did not create the gallery until at least two of its files exist. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jameslwoodward Have you seen that here we are not in the main space but on a page of a user ? I think that these pages of users have'nt the same status than the others and should haven't to be treated as the same way. But as I see that I'm being watched, I'll try to avoid red links (links without files) ... even though these pages are specially intended to verify if all files of a category are uploaded!! .Roland45 (talk) 18:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That would be an interesting question if the file name were User:Roland45/gallery-Cartes-QGIS-26-Sols -- in your own space, you have much more freedom. However the file named above (and many others) are not in your user space -- they are main space galleries and main space rules apply. I suggest that in the future you include the "User:" prefix in the file name. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir Roland,
Tu as fait un énorme boulot et le rendu est superbe pour les cartes d'occupation des sols comme pour les aires d'attraction.
Est-ce qu'il serait possible d'automatiser le remplissage des catégories pour que ce soit plus facilement trouvable ?
Par exemple pour File:42-AAV2020-Montbrison.png j'ai mis les cartes de communes en France. Et pour File:42012-Bard-Sols.png, j'ai mis les cartes de communes dans le département où elle se trouve.
Bonne soirée. Nezdek (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Je viens de voir que tu verses des cartes des sols des communes de l'Essonne dans Commons. Or elles existent déjà (dans les catégories "Maps of XXX"). Ces séries de cartes dessinées avec QGIS ont été la première que j'avais faite en novembre de l'an dernier grâce à ton tuto. Je crains qu'on se retrouve avec des doublons. --Poudou99 (talk) 09:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Poudou99: Oui. Il y a bien des doublons. J'ai en effet orthographié les suffixes Sols avec une majuscule et toi sans, du coup mes images n'ont pas été refusées par Commons et on a des doublons avec des images quasiment identiques (si elles étaient totalement identiques Commons aurait aussi refusé les miennes), mais des noms différant d'une lettre. J'avais bien pris en compte ton message pour la Seine-et-Marne et les autres départements, mais j'ai zappé sur l'Essonne. Ce n'est pas trop grave. Un peu de temps perdu, simplement. Cordialement.Roland45 (talk) 09:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Une autre petite différence entre les cartes est que j'avais systématiquement déplacé les légendes lorsque celles-ci masquaient des bouts de territoires (on en avait parlé au tout début de mon implication). J'avais fait cela pour tous les types de cartes et pour les 5 départements dont je me suis occupés. Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 15:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Poudou99: Oui. C'était une bonne initiative. Je l'ai fait aussi quelquefois, mais j'avoue avoir abandonné au bout d'un certain temps. Quand j'ajouterai le texte "Occupation des sols" aux articles des communes de l'Essonne ~et de Seine-et-Marne qui n'ont pas cette section, je prendrai tes cartes. Pour les 3 autres départements qui ont déjà été faits, j'ai déjà utilisé tes cartes (ex : fr:Aiton).Roland45 (talk) 15:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour l'importation des cartes des sols. Mais deux problèmes : ce serait bien d'ajouter systématiquement la catégorie de la commune ; et dans la ligne "description", toutes les communes de l'Eure sont décalées : ce n'est pas la bonne qui est indiquée. J'ai corrigé pour les 51 communes de la Communauté de communes Lieuvin Pays d'Auge et quelques autres, mais le problème subsiste pour la majorité des autres fichiers sols (je ne sais pas pour les autres départements, ou si le problème est spécifique à l'Eure). Baronnet (talk) 14:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Baronnet: Bonjour. Merci du signalement et ... du conseil. Mais attention aux généralisations hâtives. Pour votre information, j'ai chargé près de 20 000 cartes d'occupation des sols de communes et près de 95 % de ces cartes sont actuellement utilisées dans les articles de communes de France métropolitaine (les communes nouvelles ne sont pas utilisées). Elles peuvent être consultées sur ma ma page perso. Mes réponses :
La question des catégories est identifiée depuis longtemps. En fait j'ai commencé d'ailleurs en ajoutant la catégorie de la commune de chacune des cartes, en prenant comme libellé celui du libellé dans Wikipédia et en utilisant l'automate Pattypan. Mais il s'avère que ce libellé n'est pas toujours le même dans Commons (même si c'est vrai à 90 %). Les fautives doivent donc être reprises à la main. Ce qui est hyper-fastidieux. Ensuite il m'a semblé souhaitable d'ajouter une catégorie thématique "Maps of land use of communes of xxx", mais ne sachant alors pas ajouter deux catégories à la fois, j'ai abandonné la commune. Ce n'est que tardivement que j'ai compris comment ajouter plusieurs catégories dans Pattypan. Et c'est donc le cas de certains départements.
Concernant les communes de l'Eure, il y a eu effectivement un bug, qui court de 27001-Aclou à 27613-Saint-Vincent-du-Boulay-Sols.png. Ce n'est pas dû à l'automate, mais à une erreur de manip que j'ai faite dans la préparation des tables à charger (car tout n'est pas automatique ! et en matière de bot, il faut être hyper-vigilant car une erreur massive peut arriver vite!).
Est-ce vraiment grave ? Pour moi non car :
Comme je l'ai dit, ces cartes sont déjà utilisées dans les articles des communes concernées et, selon mon point de vue, il n'y a pas d'autres utilisations possibles. Donc tout affinement de la catégorisation serait purement cosmétique ;
comme vous, d'autres ont argué qu'il fallait catégoriser non pas à la commune, mais selon la catégorie "map of communes de xx " (car en matière de catégorisation, il n'y a en fait pas de limites!), sauf que là aussi, toutes ces catégories n'existent pas pour toutes les communes de France, ce n'est donc pas automatisable par un bot, sauf à créer par un bot spécial préalablement ces catégories manquantes ;
concernant le descriptif, les cartes sont clairement identifiables par le nom du fichier (code Insee + nom commune). Le descriptif n'est donc qu'accessoire.
Ces erreurs pourraient être corrigées par un (ou plutôt des) bot(s), dont il conviendrait d'écrire le script. Ce n'est pas infaisable, mais ce serait une perte de temps inutile (ou disons peu utile). J'ai un nombre considérable de tâches en cours (sur WP) et, comme le temps est compté, il faut hiérarchiser l'intérêt des interventions. Je ne corrige que quand l'erreur induit une erreur dans l'affichage dans Wikipédia (ce qui n'est pas le cas ici). Maintenant tout cela peut aussi être fait ... à la main!!! Cordialement.Roland45 (talk) 15:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Roland45. Je viens de m'apercevoir que tu as créé des catégories pour regrouper les cartes d'une même commune mais sans penser à les remplir quand tu crées ces cartes (exemple Category:Maps of communes in Creuse ou Category:Maps of communes in Dordogne, dont presque toutes les sous-catégories sont vides. Si tu as la possibilité de faire tourner un bot pour les remplir, ce serait top. Sinon, je remplirais petit à petit ces catégories, au fur et à mesure de mes centres d'intérêt. Père Igor (talk) 13:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour. Je consulte cet article sur Wikipedia. Belle carte du réseau hydrographique (File:64152-Buros-Routes-Hydro.png).
Dommage que le nom de la rivière principale, Luy de Béarn, n'apparaisse pas.
Comme je ne sais pas modifier cette carte, je vous écris en espérant que vous le ferez .... Meilleurs sentiments,
--ChristianeB (talk) 08:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour @ChristianeB: Oui. C'est effectivement dommage, d'autant que c'est le cours d'eau principal. Ce type de carte est produit automatiquement via un SIG et quelquefois certaines étiquettes de couches sont masquées par d'autres couches. Bon, j'admets, c'est du jargon ... mais c'est bel et bien l'explication. Je corrigerai via une retouche manuelle du fichier. Mais cela ne va pas être immédiat car je suis sur d'autres tâches. Cordialement.Roland45 (talk) 08:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Roland, dans les Hautes-Alpes, mais sans doute ailleurs aussi, la légende des cartes communales d'occupation des sols est incomplète. Il manque visiblement plusieurs types de zones alpines (bleu glacier et gris/sable). Et une bonne année puisque c'est la période ! --Birdie (talk) 13:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Birdie: Oui. C'est un choix éditorial. Ajouter toutes les couleurs aurait fait une légende très importante. Faire une légende sélective aurait nécessité de faire un travail plus conséquent et beaucoup plus de temps (ici l'édition se fait en automatique sur un département). Tout est question de temps! Je reconnais qu'il y a quand même un manque. Cordialement.Roland45 (talk) 11:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Peut-être pourrait-on envisager une légende par département ou par zones, alpages ou glaciers d'une part, landes ou marais salants d'autre part s'excluant mutuellement. Birdie (talk) 12:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Roland45, apologies for writing in English. Thank you very much for all the "cartes des sols"! I've started using them on the Dutch Wikipedia. Will keep me occupied for quite some time.;) MartinD (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Roland45. J'ai remarqué que le fichier 54100-Brin-sur-Seille-Sols.png omet l'étang situé à l'Ouest de la commune, et qui est un élément important, lieu de promenade réputé dans la région. Amicalement. - C'est moi (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai remarqué que sur le fichier 43002-Aiguilhe-Sols.png, les deux exclaves de la communes dAiguilhe ont été omises. Cordialement --Péeuh (talk) 21:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Péeuh: Bonjour. Peux-tu préciser ? Si on regarde la carte intéractive figurant dans l'article, il n'y a pas d'exclave. Comme pour les limites administratives de mes cartes, j'utilise un export d'OSM sur data.gouv.fr (ici), c'est normal que je n'en ai pas non plus. J'ai également regardé sur Géoportail et n'en ai pas vu. Peut-être veux-tu parler d'une autre commune. Cordialement.Roland45 (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Péeuh: Bon, après vérification dans le cadastre, il y a bien deux exclaves. Openstreetmap est donc fausse. Je vais produire une nouvelle carte adaptée (du cadastre, car pour les sols, je n'ai pas le bon périmètre). Clmt.Roland45 (talk) 09:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Je suis allé voir sur le cadastre et sur geoportail avant mon premier message sur WP. Je te confirme qu'il y a bien deux exclaves situés à l'ouest. Voici leurs situation sur Géoportail => lien. Sur OSM, j'ai remarqué l'erreur suite à un revert sur WP fr pour un pont qui ne se trouvait pas dans Aiguilhe sur OSM et pour avoir le cœur net, j'ai épluché le cadastre et donc découvert ces deux exclaves. Cordialement Péeuh (talk) 10:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC). Péeuh (talk) 10:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading some images!
Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!
Bonjour. Je m'intéresse à la commune en objet, or le hameau du Bosc-le-Comte au sud-est est masqué par le cartouche. Pas de chance ?
[2]
Cordialement.--Totorvdr59 (talk) 16:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Communauté de communes Marche et Combraille en Aquitaine[edit]
Bonjour, il y a erreur sur la carte de la Communauté de communes Marche et Combraille en Aquitaine (File:23-Intercos2019-200067593.png). Certaines communes apparaissent en blanc au sud du territoire alors qu'elles appartiennent à Haute-Corrèze Communauté. Est-il possible de modifier cela ? Merci. LucasD (talk) 12:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:24111-La Chapelle-Montmoreau-Routes-Hydro.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Un petit message pour te prévenir que les cartes Category:Maps of Natura 2000 in Gers ont été importées en double (premier import 20/09/2021, second 10/02/2022).
Rien de particulier à faire, mon bot les a automatiquement classées dans Category:Duplicate, c'est juste pour information.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
@Pierre cb: Les données utilisées sont diffusées par le site Propluvia et sont publiques et librement téléchargeables au format .csv. La mise en forme de graphique a été faite ensuite. Elles étaient disponibles début août, par contre l'accès à cette page est actuellement suspendu et on ne peut plus y avoir accès. [The data used comes from the Propluvia website and is public and freely downloadable in .csv format. The chart formatting was done next. However, access to this page is currently suspended and can no longer be accessed]Roland45 (talk) 13:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Père Igor: Il s'agit d'une image. Le problème est donc pour tous. C'est manifestement dû à une rupture du flux WFS lors de la création de la carte (le fonds de carte est en effet chargé en continu via le web et non stoqué en statique sur l'ordi). s'il y a une rupture de connexion ou simplement une mauvaise connexion, on peut avoir ce genre de problème. A l'occasion, je referai cette carte.Roland45 (talk) 18:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Effectivement, j'ai vu également ce problème sur d'autre cartes mais c'est la seule que j'ai repérée où la ZNIEFF est incomplète. Pour une carte décrivant les ZNIEFF, c'est embêtant. Père Igor (talk) 10:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2dk: C'est effectivement balot!! Je vais essayer de retrouver le projet das mon SIG, mais pour l'instant je suis particulièrement pris ailleurs! Cordialement.Roland45 (talk) 21:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have grantedautopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Hydrographic_maps_of_Côtes-d'Armor_by_commune has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading File:69299-Colombier-Saugnieu-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37072-Chinon-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37223-Saint-Laurent-de-Lin-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37259-Tournon-Saint-Pierre-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37269-Verneuil-sur-Indre-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37133-Loché-sur-Indrois-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37214-Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37265-Varennes-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37207-Saint-Aubin-le-Dépeint-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37043-Cangey-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37281-Vouvray-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37247-Sepmes-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37023-Beaumont-Village-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37062-Château-la-Vallière-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:37105-Faye-la-Vineuse-Hydro.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Done Merci du signalement. Noms manquants ajoutés. Couleurs modifiées. Mise en forme de certains noms améliorée.Roland45 (talk) 13:01, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
-AAV2020.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
→ Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 10:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:76641-Saint-Pierre-le-Vieux-Sols.png){kind=link}
