User talk:Riozujar

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Riozujar!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Salon actos Ateneo de Madrid.jpg

File:Salon actos Ateneo de Madrid.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Discasto _talk 11:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. Elisfkc (talk) 15:14, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Dibujo / painting

Hola, Riozujar. He deshecho esto. Las obras de Pradilla en La Ilustración Española y Americana y La Ilustración de Madrid no son cuadros suyos grabados por terceros, sino dibujos grabados por terceros. Pradilla además de pintor fue ilustrador de revistas en sus años mozos. Un saludo. strakhov (talk) 12:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Pier Maria Baldi Aranjuez.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Categorías

Hola, Riozujar. Vi que creaste "Flora and fauna of Casa de Campo". En mi opinión las categorías con construcciones del tipo "esto y lo otro" deberían evitarse.

En primer lugar porque son ambiguas y se pueden entender tanto como «esto o lo otro» ("flora o fauna de la Casa de Campo", ambas cosas valen... el que tú le quisiste dar) como «esto y a la vez lo otro» (fotos de la Casa de Campo con imágenes con al menos una planta y un animal, simultáneamente).

Por otro lado se introduce una pérdida de transitividad al categorizarlas. Por ejemplo Flora and fauna of Casa de Campo colgaba tanto de "Flora of Madrid" como de "Animals of Madrid", por lo que un pavo real estaba categorizado en Flora of Madrid. Si bien naturalmente el sistema de categorías de Commons dista de ser transitivo, creo que si se puede evitar esta situación creando "Flora of Casa de Campo" y "Animals/Fauna of Casa de Campo" por separado tanto mejor, la categoría "suma" no es tan importante y quizás sea mejor llamarla "Nature of Casa de Campo" o algo así, donde se pueden colgar estas subcategorías y alguna otra más relacionada con 'cosas naturales' inertes ("Life in Casa de Campo" para distinguir cosas vivas de no vivas sonaría un poco...). Perdona la chapa, un cordial saludo y gracias por tu trabajo con las fotos de Madrid. strakhov (talk) 16:35, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Hola! Te deshice en "Views of Sierra de Guadarrama". Un poco por lo mismo de arriba: intransitividad. En "views de Castilla y León" terminarían subcategorizadas en la práctica un montón de fotos de la laguna de Peñalara, La Pedriza y La Maliciosa (que son cosas madrileñas!). ¡Confusión pues! Si crees que es importante relacionar las fotos de la sierra de Guadarrama con que estén en una u otra comunidad autónoma, creo que es mejor, en lugar de colgar a las vistas de la sierra de ambas comunidades... crear las intersecciones Category:Views of Sierra de Guadarrama in the Community of Madrid y Category:Views of Sierra de Guadarrama in Castile and León o algo así. A la primera la categorizas en "Views of Sierra de Guadarrama" y "Views of the Comunity of Madrid". Y así.

Ahora bien, esto es más mi opinión personal, a mí me suele gustar llevar los "árboles" de geografía política y geografía física por separado, sin mezclar. A mí me interesaría más subcategorizar las views de la sierra de Guadarrama en si son views de La Pedriza o de Siete Picos y menos si son views of the province of Segovia o of Ávila. Y, por el otro lado del "árbol", las "views de la Community of Madrid" creo que es más valioso subcategorizarlas por el municipio (cuando se pueda/sepa, claro) que por la-porción-de-tal-accidente-físico-que-cae-dentro-de-la-comunidad. Es decir, parte física por un lado, parte política por el otro. Al fin y al cabo se pueden hacer intersecciones con herramientas externas como PetScan. Pero bueno, es lo que tiene la dinámica de la categorización aquí: puede llevarse —y se lleva— al infinito, así que como veas.

Por cierto, he estado meditando si a la categoría de "Views of Sierra de Guadarrama" llamarla "Remote views of Sierra de Guadarrama" o "Views of Sierra de Guadarrama from afar" o alguna historia así, para acotar su contenido a fotos de la sierra "desde lejos" (es decir, excluir fotos de la Bola del Mundo desde Valdemartín, del Risco del Pájaro desde Peñalara, etc). Un saludo y perdona la chapa! strakhov (talk) 02:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Cambio de nombre de categorías

Hola! Cuando quieras cambiar el nombre de una determinada categoría, es mejor trasladarla ("More -> Move", como si fuera un artículo de Wikipedia) en lugar de crear una nueva a palo seco. Al trasladarla, se cambia automáticamente el enlace en Wikidata en segundos/minutos (al menos el sitelink), sin que tengas que hacer nada. Si no... es más dudoso. Un cordial saludo. strakhov (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Cat-a-lot

¡Hola! ¿Conoces Cat-a-lot? Si no, te puede ser muy útil. Si sí, no dije nada. Un saludo y gracias por las categorizaciones (y por corregir alguna cagad* de este servidor). strakhov (talk) 22:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Drawings of the Community of Madrid by Pier Maria Baldi

Hola Riozujar:

Has creado la categoría "Category:Drawings of the Community of Madrid by Pier Maria Baldi", pero tiene un problema: Aunque Baldi pintó con acuarela esas imágenes de la Comunidad de Madrid, luego se transformaron en grabados para poder publicarlos (Sánchez Rivero A, Mariutti de Sánchez Rivero A. Viaje de Cosme de Médicis por España y Portugal (1668-1669). Madrid: Sucesores de Rivadeneyra; 1933.) por lo que deberías trasladar la denominación de esta categoría de "Drawings" a "Engravings". Un cordial saludo:Raimundo Pastor (talk) 19:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

No soy un experto en arte; siempre es lioso etiquetar una técnica artística pero, además, se complica cuando esa etiqueta la tenemos que poner en inglés. Entiendo que pintura (painting) serían cuadros únicos, generalmente al óleo o al fresco o acuarela, poli o monocromáticos. Dibujo (drawings) serían cuadros únicos, pintados con lápiz, carboncillo o tinta china. Sin embargo, los grabados (engravings) son "estampas obtenidas por medio de la impresión de planchas preparadas al efecto", es decir, hay un proceso industrial que permite la reproducción de una pintura o un dibujo obteniendo múltiples copias todas similares. Sin duda Baldi, en sus viajes, tomaría apuntes al natural mediante dibujos o acuarela, pero las imágenes que disponemos son de grabados presentados en un libro (Sánchez Rivero A, Mariutti de Sánchez Rivero A. Viaje de Cosme de Médicis por España y Portugal 1668-1669. Madrid: Sucesores de Rivadeneyra; 1933. http://purl.pt/12926/4/ea-326-a_PDF/ea-326-a_PDF_24-C-R0150/ea-326-a_0000_capa-capa_t24-C-R0150.pdf ) por lo que esas imágenes son grabados y no dibujos o pinturas. Un cordial saludo: Raimundo Pastor (talk) 19:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Ponlo como te parezca más correcto. Un cordial saludo:Raimundo Pastor (talk) 20:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

In / of

¡Hola! En relación a Category:Streets of Aranjuez in art (y 'hermanas') decir que al parecer existen Category:Streets in London in art y Category:Streets of Paris in art (ambas versiones preposicionales). A mí me parece mucho más práctico que categorías embebidas unas dentro de otras compartan la misma raíz, suene más cacofónico o menos repetir preposición (esto me resulta muy secundario). Así cuando alguien etiquete con HotCat una calle de Madrid (o Aranjuez o...) y empiece a teclear Streets in Madrid se le devolverá la opción extra de añadir el matiz in art, cosa que no pasará si a una le ponemos of y a otra in.

Dicho esto, supongo que hasta cierto punto influirá cuál es la norma predominante en Commons respecto al uso de preposiciones en el caso de calles, que, sinceramente, no lo sé. Pareciera haber de las dos. No sé cómo lo verás... strakhov (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

PD: Category:Streets in art todas las que hay aquí (España al margen) son in-in. No sé si será significativo, la verdad. strakhov (talk) 09:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Bueno, un cuadro de la Fontana de Trevi en el Museo del Prado (o en el Louvre) daría problemas también con Category:Fountains in Madrid y Category:Fountains in Paris pero me da la impresión que eso no obsta para que la mayoría de las categorías de Category:Fountains by country usen aparentemente 'in', sin tener yo tampoco un C2 de inglés ni nada que se le parezca (que no creo siquiera que sea tan importante, lo esencial es la homogeneidad ...más que una sintaxis-gramática ideal: si por lo que sea resulta que varios ingleses de pura cepa se ponen de acuerdo en que "of" es mejor, se trasladan todas las categorías de calles del mundo de "in" a "of" con un bot tras un sesudo consenso y ya está. Tanto más cómodo será ese traslado si todas categorías compartían la estructura "Streets in Lugar" antes).

Este tipo de categorización que me cuentas ("por objeto representado y por lugar donde está el cuadro") no la he visto muy desarrollada ni creo que vaya a corto/medio plazo popularizarse (echa si quieres un ojo a las subcats de Category:Paintings in Madrid). Si te parece bien homogeneizar a in-in, se puede hacer rápidamente con Cat-a-lot (mientras no se masifique el número de cats con "in-of", claro). Consiste en trasladar de nombre la categoría y después seleccionar todas las imágenes y mover a la nueva. Lo puedo hacer yo si te parece. strakhov (talk) 10:18, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Nah, no te preocupes. Molestia ninguna. Ya están trasladadas todas las de la Comunidad de Madrid (y París), ya ves tú qué trabajo. Por cierto, la de Category:Streets of Paris in art la había creado yo. xD strakhov (talk) 10:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

of-from

People of Madrid in art ¿Te parece bien usar "People from" para gente nacida en Madrid y un "People of" más genérico para gente "de/en" Madrid (que puede ser categoría madre de la primera) como solución a la remanguillé? A título personal las categorías de nacidos en me parecen poco interesantes (y me estorban los típicos caretos de algún reyezuelo o político en medio de otras más 'folclóricas' representando al poble madrileño anónimo) pero estando ya ahí... En cualquier caso me parece bien distinguir ambos usos en estas categorías. En mi contra que no parece ser algo muy estandarizado...

En París tienen Category:People of Paris y dentro de esta Category:People in Paris (solución "propia", pues no cuelga de ningún otro árbol)

En Nueva York tienen Category:People of New York City donde incluyen todo ("Esta categoría se trata de personas nacidas en, o relacionados con, New York City")

En Berlín tienen Category:People of Berlin donde también parecen incluir a toda persona relacionada.

Un saludo. strakhov (talk) 12:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Uncategorized images of Madrid

Veo que eres un as de las categorías. ¿Me ayudas a categorizar las 8 fotos que quedan? Triplecaña (talk) 20:10, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Me han ayudado ya, quedan parques que cuentan con coordenadas que ya se harán. Siempre puedes intentarlo con Category:Unidentified locations in Madrid. Gracias, cuando puedas. Triplecaña (talk) 08:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Castillo de Villaviciosa de Odón

He creado el artículo en es.wiki. Te aviso por si quieres añadir alguna imagen de las tuyas, pero que dejo a tu criterio. Triplecaña (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Riozujar,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Santa María la Real de La Almudena (24443115014).jpg

File:Santa María la Real de La Almudena (24443115014).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Santa María la Real de La Almudena (24443115014).jpg

Yours sincerely, Ww2censor (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Nicolas Lekuona 1.jpg

Hola. Para esta imagen, cual es la fecha de muerte de Nicolás de Lekuona? GMG^talk 14:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Museum Reina Sofia (4252258798).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Museum Reina Sofia (4252258798).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Mifter (talk) 03:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522973588).jpg

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522973588).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522968390).jpg

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522968390).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522390311).jpg

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522390311).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522974844).jpg

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522974844).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:En el Reina Sofía (5522972444).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:En el Reina Sofía (5522972444).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:En el Reina Sofía (5522972444).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:Museo Reina Sofía (5945137149).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522376187).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522368495).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522379915).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522960504).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522390311).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522371139).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522974844).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522366757).jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Trabajos derivados

Hola, Riozujar. Muchas de estas esculturas y otras obras de arte tienen derechos de autor. Por favor mira: Commons:Trabajos derivados. --Rrburke (talk) 13:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Hola de nuevo, Riozujar. Cuando usa la plantilla {{PD-old-70}}, también es necesario usar otra plantilla que explique por qué el trabajo también es de "dominio público" en los Estados Unidos. La razón es que los servidores de Wikimedia están domiciliados en los Estados Unidos. Para determinar si un trabajo es de dominio público en los Estados Unidos, por favor consulte estos documentos: Commons:Hirtle chart/es y Commons:Licensing/es#Material en el dominio público. Es bastante confuso, así que si le causa problemas, no dude en pedirme que se lo explique, aunque no estoy seguro de poder explicarlo en español. ¿Habla usted Inglés? Saludos. --Rrburke (talk) 13:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted content

---

Hello Riozujar, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522366757).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522368495).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522371139).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522376187).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522379915).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522390311).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522960504).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522972444).jpg
• File:En el Reina Sofía (5522974844).jpg
• File:Museo Reina Sofía (5945137149).jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ^💬 07:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Categorías

Hola, Riozujar. Desde hace un tiempo me asalta cierta incomodidad con las categorías de los engravings of. ¿En qué sentido esto es un "grabado"? (sí, parece ser una especie de fotograbado de algo previo que no creo fuera un grabado). No creo que sea mucho más grabado que esto (una "fotografía" fotograbada para aparecer en una revista). O es tan grabado como esto es una "fotografía" (que lo es, una fotografía ...de un "cuadro·). Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Bueno, yo soy partidario de categorizar al menos por la naturaleza principal de la obra de arte. Cuando es pintura fotografiada, obviamente por..."paintings". Cuando es un dibujo fotograbado para aparecer en una revista... ..."drawings", "illustrations", etc. Es decir, sería más exigente a la hora de incluir imágenes en "Engravings", centrándome en aquellas que ... sean xilografías, calcografías u otros procedimientos donde la personita graba algo con el sudor de "su frente" y de "su arte" (además, si nos ponemos finolis se puede argumentar que las litografías no serían siquiera "en pureza" una técnica de "grabado"). Después si, además, se quiere categorizar por "Photoengravings" o "Photographs of sculptures from behind" (o printmakings... o lo que toque...) adelante (aunque con estos aspectos "secundarios" no profundizaría en el árbol con muchas subcategorías, no sé si me explico). También, en el caso de los grabados... sería bueno precisar si wood engravings o qué tipo, en lugar de quedarse con "engravings" a palo seco. En los casos de fotograbados (o fotografías, o escaneos. o...) de obras-que-no-son-pinturas en los que nos asalten las dudas sobre la técnica artística "principal" de la ilustración (que puede pasar, yo disto de ser un experto)... podrían llevarse a un genérico "illustrations" (¿quizás más abarcativo que drawings?).

En la práctica las imágenes artísticas (sumo también las fotografías en la clasificación, aunque acá vayan al margen de la rama in art) han terminado como:

"Photographs" los escaneos de fotografías y los fotograbados de fotografías (¿quizás también indirectamente (vía categoría del fotógrafo) alguna xilografía a partir de fotografía?).

"Paintings" las fotografías de pinturas (quizás también algún fotograbado chusco en blanco y negro de pintura y tal, también indirectamente vía categoría del pintor).

"Sculptures" las fotografías de esculturas

"Engravings" ...todo lo demás (grabados, fotograbados de cualquier cosa que no sea una pintura al óleo o una fotografía y diría que en general.. casi cualquier tipo de técnica de impresión/printmaking).

Resumiendo, "Category:Engravings" está funcionando como cajón de sastre en el que termina todo lo que está con la coletilla «in art» y no es principalmente "pintura" ni "escultura" y creo que convendría mejorar esto. Un cordial saludo. Strakhov (talk) 23:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Siete Picos (43081487920).jpg

Copyright status: File:Siete Picos (43081487920).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Siete Picos (43081487920).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:46, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mi nuevo pueblo (39521481404).jpg

Copyright status: File:Mi nuevo pueblo (39521481404).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mi nuevo pueblo (39521481404).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:46, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Riozujar,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Azulejos of Madrid fountains vs Category:Azulejos of fountains in Madrid

Buenas, entiendo que la primera es azulejos que representen fuentes de Madrid y la segunda azulejos de fuentes en Madrid (de cualquier fuente). No obstante, ¿es necesario precisar tanto? Se producen bastantes duplicidades. Un saludo Triplecaña (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Gracias a ti, el trabajo que haces es magnífico. Triplecaña (talk) 18:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Riozujar,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Riozujar,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Riozujar,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia (20000012142).jpg

Copyright status: File:Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia (20000012142).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia (20000012142).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Alinea (talk) 11:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:En el Reina Sofía (5522359335).jpg

Copyright status: File:En el Reina Sofía (5522359335).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:En el Reina Sofía (5522359335).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Alinea (talk) 11:57, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Buitrago

Hola, Riozujar. Pues eso, que son dos iglesias distintas. :) Aprovecho para desearte a ti también felices fiestas y agradecerte tus contribuciones en Commons. Strakhov (talk) 16:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:MADRID 060317 MXALX 065 (5787039670).jpg

File:MADRID 060317 MXALX 065 (5787039670).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Museo reina sofia sonido (25894853352).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Museo reina sofia sonido (25894853352).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Museo reina sofia sonido (25894853352).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Proyecto para la prolongación del paseo de la Castellana

Las imágenes de Memoria de Madrid son cc by nc 2.5. El nc no es compatible con Commons. Me acabo de dar cuenta ahora. Tanto esta imagen como las que hayas subido de esa web deben ser borradas. Un saludo Triplecaña (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:La familia Gabaldón (2648473471).jpg

And also:

• File:Visitando las ruinas de Gascas (2903164616).jpg
• File:Mamá, la tía Amparo y papá (2624932054).jpg
• File:Visitando las ruinas de Gascas (2902322907).jpg
• File:Inés y Lola (2612893014).jpg
• File:Mamá (2595108647).jpg
• File:Mamá y papá (2619074102).jpg
• File:... y la saga continúa (3003324163).jpg
• File:Mamá y yo (2624108571).jpg
• File:Mamá, papá y yo en un convite (2570150856).jpg
• File:La prima Mari Carmen (2989707869).jpg
• File:Mamá, la tía Amparo y el tío Santos (2618249849).jpg
• File:Mamá y yo, en la Plaza de Oriente (2570149952).jpg
• File:En la boda de la tía Carmen (2821561531).jpg
• File:Yo, mamá, Miguel Ángel, el tío Domingo, la prima Montse, la tía María y el primo Carlos (2571824773).jpg
• File:Joaquín Castillo (primo de mamá) (2565320996).jpg
• File:La tía Amparo y el tío Santos (2658141517).jpg
• File:Papá (2570151996).jpg
• File:De baños (2900270130).jpg
• File:Daniel y yo (2571824331).jpg
• File:El tío Ángel (2899367555).jpg
• File:El tío Ángel (2905925440).jpg
• File:El tío Ángel (2905923344).jpg
• File:La tía María (2883078294).jpg
• File:Miguel Ángel (2571824139).jpg
• File:La prima Mari Carmen (2990563316).jpg
• File:El tío Alfonso (2569323959).jpg
• File:Boda de la prima Concha (2649303692).jpg
• File:El primo Santos (2658147019).jpg
• File:Yo, mamá y Miguel Ángel (3404680925).jpg
• File:La señora Amparo (2636855864).jpg
• File:La prima Angelines (2989721269).jpg
• File:Foto familiar (2990572556).jpg
• File:Papá y mamá (2658142445).jpg
• File:El tío Santos (2618249191).jpg
• File:Boda de la prima Concha (2649304098).jpg
• File:La prima Mari Carmen (2989711285).jpg
• File:Primera comunión del primo Ángel (2989714273).jpg
• File:La abuela Carmen Villodre (2595108811).jpg
• File:La abuela Carmen (2570150116).jpg
• File:La prima Mari Carmen y Santos (2990553454).jpg
• File:Boda de la prima Concha (2649303926).jpg
• File:El tío Alfonso (2595943084).jpg
• File:Algunos de los primos (3003313551).jpg
• File:El tío Santos (2809958244).jpg
• File:Cris, yo y Angelines (2927944260).jpg
• File:Las tías Amparo y Manuela (2927932354).jpg
• File:En las lagunas de Ruidera... (2612780025).jpg
• File:La prima Angelines (2989720137).jpg
• File:La tía Manuela a los 19 (2900213768).jpg
• File:El tío Ángel (2905077013).jpg
• File:El tío Santos (2619072774).jpg
• File:La prima Angelines (2883077290).jpg
• File:Boda del tío Domingo (2570150752).jpg
• File:Yo, Alba, mamá y Miguel Ángel (3404680933).jpg
• File:Boda del tío Ángel (2888292566).jpg
• File:Miguel Ángel en Alicante (2571825063).jpg
• File:El tío-abuelo Alfonso Alcolea (2595108899).jpg
• File:Boda de la prima Concha (2649303808).jpg
• File:Primera comunión de la prima Inés (2648473569).jpg
• File:El tío Ángel y la tía Manuela (2903262660).jpg
• File:El tío Santos, mamá y la tía Amparo (2636856924).jpg
• File:La tía María y la tía Carmen (2822399252).jpg
• File:El tío Ángel y la tía Manuela (2905920136).jpg
• File:La prima Lola y la tía Manuela (2811625180).jpg
• File:Lola (a la defensiva) y Fini (3028695254).jpg
• File:La tía Amparo y la prima Inés (2636855682).jpg
• File:Miguel Ángel y yo entregándole la carta a los Reyes Magos (2569324999).jpg
• File:Papá y yo en el parque de Socuéllamos (2571824023).jpg
• File:Yo, en el parque de Socuéllamos (2571824579).jpg
• File:Tomando café- Melquiades, papá, Josete, el tío Santos... (2569325153).jpg
• File:El tío Santos y la tía Amparo (2636029679).jpg
• File:El tío Ángel, la tía Manuela y los primos (en Villarrobledo) (2899426835).jpg

Yours sincerely, — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Julio López Hernández (15634951438).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Julio López Hernández (15634951438).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

Vera ^(talk) 12:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Gil Joseph Wolman (15200398994).jpg

File:Gil Joseph Wolman (15200398994).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera ^(talk) 12:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia, Madrid, Spain (24385892345).jpg

File:Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia, Madrid, Spain (24385892345).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Madrid07nov 062 (2052531702).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Muzeum Reina Sofia (4593039730).jpg

File:Muzeum Reina Sofia (4593039730).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

78.125.121.241 21:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

File:INSP 2014 SERRA (12769896204).jpg

File:INSP 2014 SERRA (12769896204).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Richard Serra. 'Equal-Parallel Guernica-Bengasi'. Reina Sofía. Madrid © Melanie Lazarow 2014 (14912651461).jpg

File:Richard Serra. 'Equal-Parallel Guernica-Bengasi'. Reina Sofía. Madrid © Melanie Lazarow 2014 (14912651461).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Madrid - Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía (35382009283).jpg

File:Madrid - Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía (35382009283).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522359335).jpg

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522359335).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia (20000012142).jpg

File:Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia (20000012142).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522355609).jpg

File:En el Reina Sofía (5522355609).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Madrid - Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía (36053889101).jpg

File:Madrid - Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía (36053889101).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Museum Reina Sofia (4252251234).jpg

File:Museum Reina Sofia (4252251234).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:32, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Museum Reina Sofia (4251403667).jpg

File:Museum Reina Sofia (4251403667).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Museum Reina Sofia (4251405375).jpg

File:Museum Reina Sofia (4251405375).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Heads (6303679732).jpg

File:Heads (6303679732).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Capilla Benito Menni 4 (4780122825).jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 19:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Capilla del Santísimo en la Catedral de la Almudena. Madrid, España.jpg

And also:

• File:Catedral de la Almudena, Madrid (España) 10.jpg
• File:Catedral Santa María la Real de la Almudena,Madrid,Comunidad de Madrid,España. (8543297862).jpg
• File:Madrid 0853 (19959394259).jpg
• File:P1040696 Espagne, Madrid, la Catedral Santa María La Real de La Almudena, Capilla del Santísimo, la pièce identifiée Maná (16403065863).jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 12:48, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:The_beatiful_german_woman_by_Max_Ernst

Category:The_beatiful_german_woman_by_Max_Ernst has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Equal-Parallel:_Guernica-Bengasi_by_Richard_Serra

Category:Equal-Parallel:_Guernica-Bengasi_by_Richard_Serra has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Fuentes en la Casa de Campo

Hola

Las fuentes que tú denominas de "San Roque", "Canal de la Partida", "Covas" y "Moreras", según creo, reciben otro nombre en [1]. Su autor es el más reputado en la actualidad sobre la Casa de Campo. No obstante, si me dices cuál fue tu fuente para nombrarlas así, podremos cotejar unas y otras; tal vez sean sinónimos o hayan cambiado con el tiempo.

Gracias LBM1948 (talk) 18:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Madrid - Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía (35382002843).jpg

And also:

• File:Madrid - Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía (35796312500).jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Museo nacional centro de arte reina sofia (5753987085).jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)