User talk:Renardo la vulpo/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Apparently this image is used and misattributed by transylvania.info here. They claim the image was from September 30, 2006, and owned by transsylvania.info, when you uploaded it here at the Commons on October 2, 2005. They even left your EXIF data intact... Lupo 12:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Regen, pontoj.jpg is uncategorized since 21 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  and WP:DACIA  to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!
|
... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 |
--Codrin.B (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Ort vs Orth
Servus! Beide Schreibweisen sind möglich (zB schlossorth.com), wobei du recht hast, Ort ist deutlich üblicher ;) LG --AleXXw 19:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Danke! Na, dann lass' ma 's halt, zum Unterschied zu Schloss Orth in Niederösterreich. -- Aisano (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Recht hast, hifts nicht schadets nicht ;) LG --AleXXw 20:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Altötting, Rathaus 1.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
About File:Koh Poda 16.jpg
Hello, if possible to remove the catamaran (without problem for the picture ?) it will be beter for make this picture a very good view (postcard). You can give your vote to make it QI if you agree with me, my critics where only on details - Best regards - Siren-Com (talk) 10:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion. I uploaded the modified picture, and it displays correctly in the 1:1 scale. But for anything I tried I could not get it to display in any scaled-down size (I purged my browser cache, used Shift-F5 and Ctrl-Shift-R, added "?action=purge" to countless URLs, all to no avail).
- Maybe to-morrow will be another day, and the Wikimedia server will have purged its caches. In the meantime you can see the new version using a non-standard picture size, such as 1025 instead of 1024.
- -- Aisano (talk) 20:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 2.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wasserburg am Inn, Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 1.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Forte Marghera, rulilo.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seefeld in Tirol, Straßenlaterne 2012 1.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Un problème aux images de qualité, réponse
Bonsoir Aisano,
- Je n'arrive pas à retrouver l'incident dont tu me fais part.
- Je n'ai en aucun cas volontairement supprimé ou altéré ton commentaire sur l'image dont tu parles, je ne me le serais pas permis.
- Si j'ai un désaccord avec le jugement d'un contributeur, je le lui fais savoir par les voies normales, ce n'est pas le cas en l'occurrence.
- Il doit donc s'agir d'une erreur de ma part, ou d'une fausse manoeuvre, et je te prie en conséquence de m'en excuser.
- As-tu un moyen technique de me montrer plus précisément l'endroit où j'ai fait une bêtise ? Je cherche et ne trouve pas.
- En tous, cas, je te renouvelle mes excuses pour cet méprise probable.--Jebulon (talk) 21:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ne s'agirait-il pas plutôt d'un conflit d'édition (edit conflict) ?
- Nous avons dû intervenir en même temps, et le système aurait mélangé les deux interventions en privilégiant la mienne ? --Jebulon (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Non, ma modification n'a pas été perdue, je faisais juste l'ajout du signe
Oppose en "Consensual review", pour que ce soit plus clair pour le futurs reviewers. - Ravi de te croiser également, merci de ta gentillesse ! --Jebulon (talk) 21:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Please review it one more time now that I've photoshopped the box --Vera (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Antwort
Hallo, Ich habe dir auf User_talk:Steinsplitter geantwortet. LG -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Bonsoir, j'ai amélioré la légende du fichier plus deux autres.
+http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PR1-06-2012.jpg +http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PR2-06-2012.jpg
Sincèrement, Bourgeois.A (talk) 22:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I promise to be a good boy. (Btw I have reviewer status on the German and the Esperanto Wikipedias.). -- Aisano (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pomnik Kilińskiego 2012.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heilbronn, Postamt 2t.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Appologise
Hello Aisano, I do appologise if you thought my comments left were a bit pretentious, This was not in anyway my intention and appologise again if you thought that. When reading peoples comments i feel this helps with my learning as alot of people on wikicommons have been on the site for ages and have a wealth of knowledge to offer including your good self. I have found alot of people review pictures and add a one word comment like 'QI' or 'QI for me' etc which is good for a person having there picture reviewed but doesnt give alot away as to why it is QI, again with comments which are not QI valid reasons are something to be taken into consideration and learnt by which is how we all learn. This is also the same when comments are left in different languages which someone like me who is learning all the time cannot benifit from your comment which is well worth knowing, only to not be able to understand it, but i fully understand how hard learning other languages and how difficult it is and only wish I could have learnt other languages. As for the Union Jack on my WP page this is not meant to be a 'being proud to be' icon but to let others know where in the world I am from, thats all that is. I do hope you except my appologies as there was nothing meant by it. Kind Regards --Danesman1 (talk) 13:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Renardo la vulpo, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
|
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 11:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:Gedenktafel im Bahnhof von Kronstadt 1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
De728631 (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 08:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Straßenbahn München, Bildschirme, 1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
darkweasel94 10:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Für das Bild des Altöttinger Rathauses! Aarp65 (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC) |
Bild Schloss Schleißheim
Hallo Aisano, am reintrodus la propunerea ta categoria ştearsă. Te felicit pentru calitatea bună a fotografiilor tale. Multe salutări din Bavaria de sud !
|
Hello, Renardo la vulpo. You have new messages at User_talk:Strainu#Muzeul_de_Istorie_Na.C8.9Bional.C4.83_.C8.99i_Arheologie_din_Constan.C8.9Ba.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Copyright status: File:Plzeň, Kostel sv. Jana Nepomuckého. 3.jpeg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Plzeň, Kostel sv. Jana Nepomuckého. 3.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: Thank you for pointing out this omission; I just added a license. Until a couple of days ago the upload form used to check for the existence of a suitable license and would reject an upload without one, so I never paid too much attention to this aspect. Now this check seems to have disappeared, as well as the automatic generation of an {{information}} template. It was easier before; maybe it is on purpose to discourage newbees (why?). I will do my best to adapt to the new form. -- Aisano (talk) 17:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- I don't do anything with the upload form. You should bring your concerns to COM:VP. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps for some reason the ImprovedUploadForm gadget isn't loading for you? Such as due to disabled JavaScript or due to it being deactivated in the gadget preferences? That seems like the most likely cause of your symptoms. darkweasel94 18:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Darkweasel94: Dankon pro via konsilo! Fakte, "ImprovedUploadForm" estas markita, kaj mi ricevas la malnovan ŝablonon je la unua uzo post ensaluto, sed poste plej ofte ne. Tial mi supozas ke temas nek pri javaskripta, nek pri agorda problemo.
- Estas utile scii ke tiu ŝanĝo en la alŝuta ŝablono ne estas intenca. Do mi serĉos pri la kaŭzo; ĝis nun mi supozis, ke la aŭtomata kontrolo simple ne plu ekzistas. Ĉion bonan! -- Aisano (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Für das Bild der Margarethenkirche in Großbrannenberg! Aarp65 (talk) 21:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
- @Aarp65: Vielen Dank! -- Aisano (talk) 20:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)