User talk:Remontees

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Remontees!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bâtiment voyageurs de la gare de Marne-la-Vallée - Chessy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'esplanade de la défense.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poudou99 (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Défense gratte ciels.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poudou99 (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatroller[edit]

Hi, Remontees. So far your edits were marked as needing patrolling from more experienced users. But you have made a lot of good work and your edits do not need patrolling anymore, so I just made you autopatroller. Thank you for your work!

Google traduction. Salut, Remontees. Jusqu'à présent, vos modifications ont été marquées comme nécessitant des patrouilles d'utilisateurs plus expérimentés. Mais vous avez fait beaucoup de bon travail et vos modifications n'ont plus besoin de patrouilles, alors je viens de vous faire un autopatroller. Merci pour votre travail! Taivo (talk) 13:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[]==Nomination de masse== Bonjour, je viens de supprimer une grande quantité de fichiers que tu avais proposés, tous pour la même raison. Dans le cas d'un groupe aussi homogène, il est plus simple pour tout le monde de faire une seule nomination. Un très bon outil pour ce faire - et qui a bien d'autres usages - est VisualFileChange. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 12:46, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Merci pour ton message. À vrai dire, j'ai découvert après coup. Il y a un outil pour nominer en masse sans avoir à tout faire à la main (de la même manière qu'il en existe un pour nominer individuellement) ? Cordialement Remontees (talk) 13:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celui que je t'ai indiqué. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 14:16, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trop fatigué, effectivement, merci beaucoup. Cordialement. Remontees (talk) 14:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Renommage photo gare Ste-Hélène-du-Lac[edit]

Bonjour Remontées,

Soit je n'ai pas compris la raison du renommage, soit je ne suis pas d'accord avec le fait que la gare était de l'autre côté du passage à niveau, c'est-à-dire au nord. On voit notamment encore l'abri voyageurs sur une photographie aérienne de 2000-2005 ici. De plus il semble probable que le bout de "route" à droite de la ligne conduisait à la gare, alors qu'au nord il y a des habitations. J'annule la demande de renommage en attendant. --Floflo (talk) 15:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S : en fait je me demande si le PN ne coupait pas carrément la gare quand je vois ces photos 2 et 8 de Rail-Savoie. --Floflo (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Floflo,
Exactement, j'ai l'impression que le PN coupait la gare, ce qui m'a totalement induit en erreur. Ça serait peut-être intéressant de le préciser dans l'article Wikipédia d'ailleurs.
C'est amusant, je suis également allé là-bas hier prendre des photos (que je viens d'uploader sur Commons) : les grands esprits se rencontrent !
Toutes mes excuses en tout cas : je me suis effectivement trompé ! Remontees (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, merci pour ton retour. J'avoue que je n'avais pas fait attention au fait que le quai se prolongeait au nord du PN jusqu'à maintenant. Sinon si tu es passé à cet endroit hier aussi alors c'est étonnant ! Je viens de voir les photos, pour toi c'était le soir du coup. Dommage qu'il n'y ait plus rien à montrer de la gare sinon on aurait pu créer une galerie dans l'article. Par contre, je me dis que celle avec le panneau "baisser panto" pourrait avoir sa place sur l'article de la ligne. J'avais aussi pris une photo côté nord mais en la voyant je me suis dit qu'elle n'apportait rien de plus pour la ligne mais la tienne si du coup. À bientôt, --Floflo (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
De rien, c'est vraiment de ma faute pour le coup. J'ai vraiment eu du mal à localiser la gare !
Oui, c'est étonnant et ça m'a fait sourire de voir que tu avais créé la page de la gare le jour où j'y suis allé ! Exactement, j'y suis allé le soir en rentrant. Dommage effectivement qu'il y ait si peu de photos de l'ancienne gare, et en tout cas aucune sous licence libre compatible avec Wikipédia à ma connaissance.
Tu dois mieux connaître la ligne que moi : après ce panneau "baisser panto", il n'y a pas un autre panneau qui annonce la transition 25 kV/1500 V ? Il me semblait en avoir vu un depuis un train une fois.
À bientôt Remontees (talk) 15:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regio2n-voie-1bis-gare-st-cyr1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voies-dir-paris-montparnasse-gare-de-saint-cyr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The left-hand signal post is out of focus, can you crop that? --Mike Peel 21:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Peel : done! --Remontees 22:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 08:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avant-regio2n-voie-1bis-gare-st-cyr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The verticals should be corrected and an English description would be very helpful --Ermell 19:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ermell : done! --Remontees 22:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --多多123 22:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic-saint-michel-depuis-col-de-l-arc2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic-saint-michel-depuis-sentier-col-de-l-arc-versant-st-paul-de-varces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bv-gare-st-egreve-st-robert-depuis-quai-voie-b-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I like it, but verticals should be fixed. --Plozessor 03:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree with you. I think it's better with this new version. --Remontees 22:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare-st-egreve-neron-depuis-passerelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice but slightly tilted --Plozessor 03:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course I agree (and thanks for your comment!). What do you think about the new version I have just uploaded? --Remontees 22:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]