User talk:Raso mk/Archive.3
Deleted content[edit]
File:Tbilisi - TV Broadcasting Tower (9458174831).jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Denari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 20:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sv. Luka -Vinica.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sv. Luka -Vinica.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sv. Luka -Vinica.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Zoupan (talk) 04:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Sv. Luka -Vinica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zoupan (talk) 04:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Freska od Sv. Nikola Zrzeski (4).jpg[edit]
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Freska od Sv. Nikola Zrzeski (4).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Zoupan (talk) 04:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Problematic uploads[edit]
- File:Sv. Luka -Vinica.jpg − Cropped from this upload at a facebook group of the municipality of Vinica, do you have permission?
- File:Freska od Sv. Nikola Zrzeski (4).jpg, and the rest of your uploads at Category:St. Nicholas Church (Zrze) − taken from Patokazmagazin; the source explicitly states that "Не е дозволено преземање на оваа содржина или на делови од неа, што се однесува на текст, фотографија и видео, без дозвола од редакцијата на ПАТОКАЗ.", do you have permission?
Please make sure to state this at the file descriptions.--Zoupan (talk) 04:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes I have. Its PD-old-70-1923. Also no need that. Works published before 1923 are in the public domain. Faithful reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, such as paintings, frescos etc. is considered by Commons to be public domain.--Rašo 10:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Also, I noticed that you tend to upload close to identical photographs (such as 13 (!) images which could have been only 2: here). Any good reason why you do this?--Zoupan (talk) 05:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
What I do, what i upload, it has nothing to do with you.--Rašo 10:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Serbian churches in FYROM[edit]
Hello Raso mk.
It is very difficult to me to understand your abbreviations like POV or U or Pls. I am 64 years old, and do not belong to young generation which communicate like this.
PLS tell me what is the problem with church of Nemanjic dynasty, and Serbian frescoes inside? Some of them show Serbian rulers from medieval times, and belong to serbian cultural heritage in FYROM today.
94.189.187.230 17:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC) Gmihail
No image in signatures[edit]
Hi, Could you remove the image in your signature please? Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:51, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Racin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
File:PŠ Gazi Baba 2013 22 05 (79).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Brunei (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Vrbjani[edit]
Здраво. Абе, тия двете села са омешани - охридското и гостиварското в едно. [1] --Мико (talk) 18:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Абе само црквата била :) Ќе ја средам. Позз --Rašo 18:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Falsified image(s?)[edit]
Dear Raso, I happened to come across on of your uploads: File:Freska na Sv. Kiril i Metodij od Sv. Bogorodica Tepavska.jpg. An image, which you have otherwise correctly referenced from the cited publication of Nikola Mitrevski. I had to fix it by uploading a new version that represents the authentic image from the source (and from the physical location, obviously).
I do not wonder what might have been the reason for you to digitally manipulate it, in order to remove the inscription "Bulgarian".
What I wonder about, however, is:
- How many other such falsified (though presumably correctly references) images you have uploaded, and
- What may actually stop you from doing so in the future.
I expect you to kindly supply a list of any other falsified images you might have uploaded. Thank you in advance. →Spiritia 16:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Falsified? I found a image, i upload. Why its so? I have no idea. And no, i do not have a such list with Falsified images.--Rašo 20:21, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- So, you mean that you uploaded a file 1:1 as you found it in the original source? →Spiritia 21:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Off course. Sometimes i use the first source of the uploded image. I do not remember about this image, but sometimes when i found a image on the net with prime source, and i use the original sourse listed above without to control. Sorry. Shit happens. U know, about all my contribution here, I can not afford such nonsense. Its will be stupid. MfG :) --Rašo 05:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- So, you mean that you uploaded a file 1:1 as you found it in the original source? →Spiritia 21:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- You mean that there is no difference between the file which you uploaded on 15 March 2013, 16:20 UTC, and the new version which I had to upload over yours on 12 June 2016, 16:29 UTC, which is the authentic image sourced from Mitrevski's publication. Compare them carefully and tell me is there a difference, or not. →Spiritia 11:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- The slight problem with that theory is that the only place where Google Images finds this version of the image is... on Wikimedia Commons. — Luchesar • T/C/U 15:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Raso mk: I am still waiting for your explanation. →Spiritia 17:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but im on vacantion right now for a wile. I do not know what u mean? Sure are diferent. One is without bg txt inscription. But i do not remerber rihgt know. Its a long time. Regards
- Make sure you will remember not to repeat this falsification. I will not hesitate to block you for that. Happy vacation. →Spiritia 21:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Dolenci has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Ehrlich91 (talk) 18:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Racin.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Racin.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Racin.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 13:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 10:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 16:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Dear Raso! Could you please tell, are you the author of King Marco's monastery photos? And if no, what is the source? I need one photo as an illustration for my scientific article, and I would like to give a proper credit. Many thanks. Sergey, Russia Please write to baikal.s@mail.ru
File:Iran - chez des habitants de la petite ville, thé et concombres, famille iranienne, hospitalité des habitants (9258496703).jpg[edit]
File:Iran - chez des habitants de la petite ville, thé et concombres, famille iranienne, hospitalité des habitants (9258496703).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Aramgah-e Omar Khayyam (6158405597).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Shkollaneberikove.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Krste-Misirkov-portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 22:02, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Arheo Museum of Macedonia (21).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kulmalukko (talk) 20:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Ohrid 003 (28973325431).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kulmalukko (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Veles X20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kulmalukko (talk) 16:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Veles X44.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kulmalukko (talk) 16:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Category:Sts._Peter_and_Paul_Church_(Blizansko) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Ehrlich91 (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Ohrid 007 (28973302391).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kulmalukko (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Ohrid 004 (28973315351).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kulmalukko (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Mala Reka has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Ehrlich91 (talk) 09:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Sv. Ilija Dojran.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 15:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Gevgelija čaršija.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Macedonia-02787 (10905004394).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Macedonia-02787 (10905004394).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Macedonia-02787 (10905004394).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MasoodHA (talk) 12:32, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Banjani River has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Ehrlich91 (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Iran 2007 011 Tehran (1731487655).jpg
- File:Iran 2007 019 Tehran (1731502121).jpg
- File:Iran 2007 020 Tehran (1732357952).jpg
- File:Iran 2007 036 Tehran (1731531737).jpg
- File:Iran 2007 072 Tehran (1731613959).jpg
Yours sincerely, Hanooz 18:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Време е за иднина, наместо небиднина! „Наша Македонија” Илинден 2018 (43802786621).jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Време е за иднина, наместо небиднина! „Наша Македонија” Илинден 2018 (43802786621).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Време е за иднина, наместо небиднина! „Наша Македонија” Илинден 2018 (43802786621).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Carevo selo.jpg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carevo selo.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Iran - sur la route d'Ispahan - fresco about water saving and environment - Environnement et économie de l'eau, fresque murale (9258499773).jpg[edit]
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Iran - sur la route d'Ispahan - fresco about water saving and environment - Environnement et économie de l'eau, fresque murale (9258499773).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Hanooz 04:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 08:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Макро низ Скопскиот Парк (94).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rudolphous (talk) 06:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Raso mk/Archive.3,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Raso mk/Archive.3,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Raso mk/Archive.3,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Veljusa Monastery St. Pantaleon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zenwort (talk) 18:42, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Osogovska freska 03.jpg[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Iran 2007 074 Tehran Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei (1732472092).jpg[edit]
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Iran 2007 074 Tehran Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei (1732472092).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
4nn1l2 (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 13.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 15.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 16.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 17.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 18.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 19.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 20.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 21.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 22.JPG
Yours sincerely, Buidhe (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 13.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 15.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 16.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 17.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 18.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 19.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 20.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 21.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 22.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 23.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 24.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 25.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 26.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 27.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 30.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 6.JPG
- File:The Holocaust Museum in Skopje 7.JPG
Yours sincerely, Buidhe (talk) 06:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
O Wiki Loves Earth 2020 em Portugal começou![edit]
Caro Raso mk/Archive.3, temos o prazer de anunciar que já começou o Wiki Loves Earth Portugal 2020, e convidámos-lo a participar. Ajude a ilustrar os artigos da Wikipédia com imagens do nosso património natural, e ganhe prémios no valor total de 1500€!
Visite o site oficial da competição para obter mais informações: Wiki Loves Earth Portugal. Aqui pode descobrir como participar. Para qualquer outra dúvida, não hesite em nos contactar pelo seguinte endereço: info@wikimedia.pt. Obrigado, a equipa organizadora do Wiki Loves Earth Portugal 2020. 19:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC) Você recebeu esta mensagem porque já participou da competição no passado |
File:Kičevski Muzej (41).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Goce-Delčev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jingiby (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Batumi - Quay (9458310199).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Iran 2007 280 Tehran (1731996447).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hanooz 13:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Veles panoram.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
78.190.12.234 17:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Tbilisi - TV Broadcasting Tower (9460901636).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:30, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Beer billboard - Women and cool beer (8181587449).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Toše poster Skopje.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Promoting a concert (8181622244).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Election campaign St. Naum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Macedonia (5881178351).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Poster of Park Beach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Macedonia (5896976730).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
File:VMRO-DPMNE pano 2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 16:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)