User talk:Poco a poco/2017-02

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan el Real, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-08, DD 10-12 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrera de los Navarros, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Zafra, Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you delete the purple fringe on the tower (see note)? --Christian Ferrer 10:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)  Done, thanks Poco a poco 11:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)  Support still a bit at top right, but it's better, thank you --Christian Ferrer 16:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casas colgadas, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 115-117 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fonfría, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It seems to me that the left side is leaning in a bit, could you check that, please? --Basotxerri 15:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 11:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC) OK now, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Santo Sepulcro, Monforte de Moyuela, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks overexposed --Uoaei1 07:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)  Darkened Poco a poco 20:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)  weak Pro Main objekt in good focus. --Milseburg 13:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 08-12 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del silencio, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Saadi, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de los Shirvanshah, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-28, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Agha Bozorg, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1. I think it's a perfect composition to use a very high f-value (sorry, that´s the next one)--Michielverbeek 21:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Si-o-se Pol, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Teherán desde la Torre Milad, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, impressive photography. --Joschi71 20:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Labros, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pucará de Chiu Chiu, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campamento de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Loa, Chiu Chiu, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 86.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Pujsa, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:56, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New

Hello, I wanna to nominate this photo, but before I wanna know your opinion? (here) thanks and sorry if I bothering you--Alaa Najjar :)..! 10:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello Alaa Najjar, no bother, no problem but I recommend you to nominate the images to QI before to want to try FP. This images is clearly tilted (check the horizon), there is also a purple halo around the lighthouse and IMHO it has too much sky. Sharpness is not the best either, but if the technical issues I mention are fixed it could have a chance to become FP. Regards, Poco² 11:53, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your notes I'll try to fix it, do you have a f.b account or other that I can send to you in it? (to avoid uploaded several version of pictures that I asked about)--Alaa Najjar :)..! 13:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Alaa Najjar, just upload it or send it to me email if you like (see the description page of any of my images). Poco² 13:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

I'll send to Gmails address with the name pocoapocowiki--Alaa Najjar :)..! 13:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

I sent--Alaa Najjar :)..! 13:53, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

sorry but did you see my last email?--Alaa Najjar :)..! 14:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, Alaa Najjar, will have a look tonight into it Poco² 14:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Another msg :)--Alaa Najjar :)..! 19:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

I haven't got any Poco² 21:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

I nominated it for IQ now (see here), after that I'll nominate it as FP. Thanks--Alaa Najjar :)..! 21:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

My photo in IQ rejected. Thanks for you help, I appreciate it--Alaa Najjar :)..! 16:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Centro comercial City Center, Doha, Catar, 2013-08-04, DD 03.JPG

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valdemoro del Rey, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 19:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berrueco, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trascoro, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 103-105 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Ibdes, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-09, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de fuego, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Pudelek 11:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zayapa (Grapsus grapsus), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 151.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zayapa (Grapsus grapsus), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 151.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berrueco, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amayas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casas colgadas, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 121-123 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monforte de Moyuela, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 16:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piedras Rojas, salar de Aguas Calientes, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 67.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pucara de Lasaná, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán Miñiques, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon MP-E 65mm 1-5x macro f2.8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Macro Ring Lite MR-14EX 2017-02-05, DD FS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filtros ND Haida Pro II MC, 2017-02-05, DD FS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Btw: Bist du mit dem Fabrikat zufrieden? --Smial 10:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC) Ja, Smial, das bin ich. Ich kann es schon empfehlen. Poco a poco 21:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería Canon LP-E6N, 2017-02-05, DD FS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Extender EF 2x III, 2017-02-05, DD FS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Hoz de la Vieja, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Impressive. But are those CA on the edges of the sky? Please check.--Peulle 21:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)  New version, there was some really slight green CA in the trees of the horizon. Tough reviews here. Poco a poco 12:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Comment I'm still seeing something strange, for instance on top of the tower. Is that not CA?--Peulle 15:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Yes there were some slight traces of CA,  new version uploaded Poco a poco 18:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Support OK, it's only very slightly visible now.--Peulle 17:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lector externo de tarjetas Compact Hama 124022 USB 3.0, 2017-02-05, DD FS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 06:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Control remoto Canon RC-6, 2017-02-05, DD FS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Grigor Lusavorich, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, and I particularly love the half-open door with the open side showing all those candles in the dark. -- Ikan Kekek 07:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascada, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I see a very light dust spot fairly close to the upper margin a bit right of center, but otherwise, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hubertusbrunnen, Múnich, Alemania10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Bellevue, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 07-09 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 19:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Planta eólica de Fröttmaning, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Brandeburgo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bravo! --Ermell 22:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de la Victoria, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soplador de aire, 2017-02-05, DD FS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Malek, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Church of San Juan el Real in Calatayud, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Church of San Juan el Real in Calatayud has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortaleza del Monte Hacho, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 03:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC) Note:as I nominated 10 pics on Feb 8th by mistake I move 5 of them this day to balance it Poco a poco 08:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinojosa, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Note:as I nominated 10 pics on Feb 8th by mistake I move 5 of them this day to balance it Poco a poco 08:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrera de los Navarros, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Note:as I nominated 10 pics on Feb 8th by mistake I move 5 of them this day to balance it Poco a poco 08:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan el Real, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-08, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 12:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Note:as I nominated 10 pics on Feb 8th by mistake I move 5 of them this day to balance it Poco a poco 08:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loscos, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Note:as I nominated 10 pics on Feb 8th by mistake I move 5 of them this day to balance it Poco a poco 08:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Nasirolmolk, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 57-59 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some tiles on the upper part may be blown, or close to it, but I'll leave that to your judgment. Regardless, this is a lovely photo. -- Ikan Kekek 11:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 18:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Seems better. -- Ikan Kekek 09:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Mausoleo de Ruhollah Khomeini, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 08.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Ruhollah Khomeini, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Novoflex Castel-Q macro rail

German engineering

Hi, regarding your question over at QIC: I haven't used this macro rail for macro focus stacking yet (I prefer refocusing), but I did use it for a stitching panorama of my needle files shot. I have looked around a bit for macro rails and they all look either too flimsy (the Manfrotto one) or are very expensive (the RRS one). I often read on forums that the Novoflex Catel-Q is worth the money, and I can confirm that so far. I switched over to Arca swiss compatible camera L-brackets and quick release clamps so the clamp on the Novoflex is very well suited for that system. If you consider it, be aware though that Arca compatible plates do have some variety in dimensions so some plates might not fit into the Novoflex or are too thin so they can't be clamped down all the way (Novoflex improved the Castel-Q for better compatibility a few years ago so it might fit more plates if you buy a new one, but not if you buy used like I did). I use a Sirui L-bracket and a Kirk tripod ring plate and they both fit well. The Novoflex Castel-Q has a profile itself to be mounted on a tripod head, and it fits well into my Really Right Stuff (RRS) B2-Pro clamp, but as said before, some clamps might be not compatible. – Lucas^T 09:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Servus Lucas, vielen Dank fürs ausführliche Feedback. Wenn ich mir eine Schiene kaufen dann werde ich auf die Platte achten und mir wohl ein Teil von Novoflex holen. Viele Grüsse, --Poco² 21:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita del Viernes, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita Shah, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. Look at the left side - vertical lines are not straight. --Halavar 13:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 13:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 13:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita del Imam Hassan Al-Asgari, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 13:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Malek, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There's a dust spot in the upper left corner and the strange object below (plane?) could be removed, too. Otherwise good. --Code 13:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 13:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)  Support --Code 14:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Saadi, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I see 2 dust spots in the sky, both on the right side. One is above a cypress (?) and the other, a very dark one (I suppose it's a dust spot because I can't figure out what else it could be) is at the top, to the left of the big trees. Once those are fixed, it should be promoted as a photo of good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC) I still see both of them. Check on what version you uploaded, please. -- Ikan Kekek 10:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC) I didn't upload anyone, sorry,  now I did Poco a poco 17:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Thanks for taking care of that. -- Ikan Kekek 08:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palacio Real, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 07-09 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio Real, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 07-09 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortaleza de Bam, Irán, 2016-09-23, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 29-31 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de Fin, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tops of trees are soft at full size, but full size is quite big. Overall, very good quality and a possible FP nominee. -- Ikan Kekek 10:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Hafez, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita del Viernes, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Malek, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Agha Bozorg, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pucara de Lasana, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Aguas Calientes, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 74.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valle de la Luna, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 171.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molino de agua de Koushk-e-no, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 20-22 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Nur eine Frage

Hallo Poco a poco, ist Deine pauschale Kritik die Retourkutsche für einen freundlichen Hinweis? Vermutlich gibt es an dem von mir vorgestellten Foto im Hinblick auf QI nichts auszusetzen, aber mit „It lacks detail“ lässt es sich abschmettern, egal welches Detail vermisst wird oder vermisst werden könnte. Trotzdem freundliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 11:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Spurzem. Das ist keine Frage sondern eine Unterstellung, die voll daneben liegt. Würdest du mich mininmal denken, würdest du wissen, dass du mit so was hier fehl am Platz bist. Dein Kommentar im Bild aus Iran war berechtigt (ich habe es auch eben gerade korrigiert), aber mein Kommentar auch. Das Bild ist einfach nicht scharf, an keiner Stelle. Für mich ist es kein QI. Ich schlage vor, wenn du am Bild nichts weiter verbessern willst (Schärfe), dann lehne ich es ab und du kannst es Richtung CR schieben. Das ist mich nach fast 10.000 QIs weiterhin wegen Kommentare zu Bildern rechtfertigen muss ist etwas ermüdend, Gruß. Poco² 13:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Du brauchst Dich nicht zu rechtfertigen. Ich habe endgültig verstanden, dass ich bei QI unerwünscht bin und werde zumindest bis auf Weiteres keine Bilder mehr vorstellen. Das zur Diskussion stehende Foto im Nachhinein als unscharf zu bezeichnen ist lächerlich. -- Spurzem (talk) 14:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Wäre schade, Spurzem, aber wenn eins wichtig bei QI ist, das ist mit Kritik (egal welche und fundiert oder nicht) umzugehen. Wenn eine Bewertung nicht passt, dann greift der Prozess über CR ein. Poco² 15:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Ich habe keine Lust, große Diskussionen zu führen oder um Wohlwollen zu flehen. Die Sache QI ist für mich vorerst mal wieder erledigt. Ich habe ja schon öfter eine längere Pause eingelegt. Wenn Ihr aber so weitermacht wie zurzeit, wird es wie bei „Wikipedia KEB“ kommen, dass allenfalls alle paar Wochen noch jemand ein Bild vorstellt, um sich dann mit spitzfindiger und oft unsachlicher Kritik abfertigen zu lassen. -- Spurzem (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de Entrepeñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monforte de Moyuela, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olmeda de la Cuesta, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peirón, Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de Dolat-Abad, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita Seyyed, Isfahan, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molino de agua de Koushk-e-no, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 25-28 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Shah Cheragh, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThe top of the tower is too distorted.--Jacek Halicki 14:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 20:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín del Príncipe, Mahan, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Complejo Amir Chakmaq, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some very slight CAs on the windows, could you fix them, please? --Basotxerri 21:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC) It was indeed veeerrryy slight, but I've fixed it. Poco a poco 21:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC) Sorry and thank you. ¡Saludos! Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mansión Masoudieh, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Malek, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Hafez, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps a bit noise in the sky, could be improved. Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add proper description. --Halavar 13:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC) For me it is too bright. Please look to the stairs at the left. -- Spurzem 21:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment Yes, he's right - image is little bit too bright. Also, it needs perspective correction because image leaning inward --Halavar 12:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 13:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me, hope that User:Spurzem agree with me:) --Halavar 17:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campamento de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Aguas Calientes, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 57-61 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 13:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Tara, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 64-67 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 13:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Nasirolmolk, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 63-65 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita Seyyed, Isfahan, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Agha Bozorg, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Spectacular, and possibly unfeaturable only because File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 64.jpg is already featured. That said, this is a different view and deserves its own feature in a big way. So when you get through all the other photos you want featured... -- Ikan Kekek 09:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pucará de Chiu Chiu, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Grigor Lusavorich, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 21:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Zoravor, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Sevanavank, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Tatev, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 77-79 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Hnevank, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Catedral de la Dormición de la Madre de Dios, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 109-111 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de la Dormición de la Madre de Dios, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 109-111 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 77.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 77.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciudadela de Meybod, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de Dolat-Abad, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Vakil, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 42-44 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita del Imam Hassan Al-Asgari, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine --Palauenc05 21:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Mausoleo de Ruhollah Khomeini, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 06.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Ruhollah Khomeini, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mansión Masoudieh, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortaleza de Bam, Irán, 2016-09-23, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monforte de Moyuela, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de Entrepeñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita Seyyed, Isfahan, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Al Bastakiya-Dubai8878.JPG

File:Al Bastakiya-Dubai8878.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Nasirolmolk, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita del Viernes, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motocicleta con cubierta, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla en Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grullas comunes (Grus grus), Bello, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Si-o-se Pol, Isfahan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 07-15 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you change this to rectilinear (perspective) projection to get the curved horizontal lines straight? --Uoaei1 05:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC) I'd really like to keep it this way for two reasons, personal preference and due to the fact that it's an FP that way. We shouldn't apply major changes to FPs Poco a poco 16:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC) Ok, good quality anyway. --Uoaei1 07:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita Seyyed, Isfahan, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)