User talk:PetarM/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleum of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi in Hazrat-e Turkestan, Kazakhstan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 11:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arian Baptistry (Ravenna) - Vault mosaics.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Arian Baptistry ceiling mosaic - Ravenna.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arian Baptistry ceiling mosaic - Ravenna.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Basilica San Vitale in Ravenna, cupola.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Lack geocoding. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 Info It is in Infobox. --Mile (talk) 20:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

It should be in the description of the picture. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

 InfoThat is part of description. Summary. Infobox has relevance. Its not there for nothing. --Mile (talk) 18:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railway workshop museum exhibition in Ljubljana, Slovenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 15:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fiat 500 in Emilia-Romagna.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fiat 500 in Emilia-Romagna.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

What is type of relief?

Hello! One question: what is type of relief here? Thanks! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia ceiling mosaics.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia ceiling mosaics.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Change of scope

Hi PetarM,

As you left a review on Commons:Valued image candidates/Eurostar et Thalys, Albertville (2007).JPG, I have to let you know that I have changed the scope to International trains at Albertville train station, following an advice.

My excuses if you already recieved a notification about the talk on the page, but some users don't activate them, so I prefered also write here.

Regards, --Floflo (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of Galla Placidia, The Good Shepherd mosaic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of San Vitale - Lamb of God mosaic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arian Baptistry ceiling mosaic - Ravenna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and wow. --Slaunger 14:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basilica of San Vitale - Lamb of God mosaic.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica of San Vitale - Lamb of God mosaic.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Vitale (Ravenna) - Mosaics - Apse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, but please add the geocode to the file too. --C messier (talk) 15:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC) :
 Done --Mile (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Apse mosaic - Basilica of San Vitale (Ravenna).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Apse mosaic - Basilica of San Vitale (Ravenna).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

File:River Ljubljanica in center of Ljubljana.jpg

File:River Ljubljanica in center of Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 06:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
University of Ljubljana Palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, but I find the crop a bit tight (and also needs some perspective/barrel correction, I see). --C messier (talk) 11:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Чумил

Здравствуйте Петaр! Спасибо вам большое за ваши добрые слова и для «фото дня». Мне очень нравится ваши фотографии. Я никогда не был в России и Сербии. Я хотел бы быть там. Пока! Albertus teolog (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 500 in Emilia-Romagna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fountain water droplets.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fountain water droplets.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gargoyles and Saints - Siena Cathedral.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gargoyles and Saints - Siena Cathedral.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adorazione dei Magi by Gentile da Fabriano - Predella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:08, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rathaus Schwäbisch Hall by nigth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Bots

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

• The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
• Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RedArmyEKT.JPG

And also:

• File:Yekaterinburg monument to all Russian fallen soliders.JPG

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NAMA department store window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments weak pro, because its not really sharp, but good composition and documentation --Hubertl 07:46, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Adorazione dei Magi by Gentile da Fabriano - Predella.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Adorazione dei Magi by Gentile da Fabriano - Predella.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rathaus Schwäbisch Hall by nigth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adorazione dei Magi by Gentile da Fabriano - Predella.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rathaus Schwäbisch Hall by nigth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Ljubljana in Ljubljanica.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljubljana in Ljubljanica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whisky glass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 19:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)  Comment The description should be better. It's a "whisky nosing glass". ;-) --XRay 17:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rathaus Schwäbisch Hall by nigth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Pavel Semyonovich Rybalko.JPG

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schwäbisch Hall - Rathaus.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwäbisch Hall - Rathaus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trans Sibir.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia ceiling mosaics.jpg

Hi PetarM,

Did you notice the recent uploads of new versions of this file of yours by another user? Based on the file size alone it appears to be based on or identical to the very first version without the sRGB colour profile. Have you been consulted about it? It is an FP, and I do not think it is OK to just change it like that. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sky team - 1st stage Tour of Slovenia 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sky team - 1st stage Tour of Slovenia 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Vitale (Ravenna) - Mosaic of Theodora.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Lack geocoding. --Jacek Halicki (talk)*
It doesnt, its in Infobox of Basilica. --Mile (talk) 07:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)]]) 23:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Notes

Hey Petar, you put image notes about photo mistakes at the File page, not on the nomination page. -- RTA 07:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Baptistry of Neon ceiling mosaic (Ravenna).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baptistry of Neon ceiling mosaic (Ravenna).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grilled salmon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 16:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleum of Galla Placidia mosaics.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Love padlocks at Butchers' Bridge (Ljubljana).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressiv, good work! Maybe a small crop at the bottom. I would support it as FPC. --Hubertl 07:50, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Vitale (Ravenna) - Mosaics, Sacrifice of Isaac mosaic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Geolocation should be on the side of the photo, not on Wikipedia side. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
* Question Is that official, if so, could you show me where is it written. Infoboxes are not made for nothing, they have some informal importance. --Mile (talk) 15:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Look here, point 5. If a certificate VI deals with the photo, it geocoding should be on the side of the photo. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:51, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

It's not a big problem. Between the two there is only one click, difference; but I think it would be good that geocodes are in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Love padlocks at Butchers' Bridge (Ljubljana).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Love padlocks at Butchers' Bridge (Ljubljana).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cappella della Madonna del Sudore (Ravenna Duomo).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cappella della Madonna del Sudore (Ravenna Duomo).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia mosaics.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia mosaics.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:35, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A pine cone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 09:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Blackbird (Turdus merula) feeding.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novigrad (Istria).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

HELP

Hi buddy,can you help me another time? For this Thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

To your immense happiness this too....you will have an entire chapter in the book about my life --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Crab (Pachygrapsus marmoratus).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crab (Pachygrapsus marmoratus).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fishing boat in Adriatic Sea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 17:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Crabs (Pachygrapsus marmoratus).webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crabs (Pachygrapsus marmoratus).webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Yarrow (Achillea millefolium).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yarrow (Achillea millefolium).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aphrophora alni (Alder Spittlebug) mating.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support only image in scope. Charles (talk) 10:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taraxacum officinale (Slovenia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

For VI

Good evening Petar, I'm glad to see you in VI. Our rules are a bit complicated: you have to put the binomial nomenclature in italics (International Convention), and to forward the vernacular name in English. For the term botany close up is not enough, you write; or flower, or habit, or button etc. If you allow, I can format the scope for you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:49, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey

Вітаємо!

8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Taraxacum officinale (Slovenia).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taraxacum officinale (Slovenia).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taraxacum officinale (Common Dandelion) flower, view from above.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dušan Ivković.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good image, but geocoding is possible and useful. Regards, Yann (talk ) 22:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)  Done --Mile (talk) 16:22, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good and useful. Yann (talk) 23:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroque ceiling frescoes (Ljubljana Cathedral).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spiral stairs (спирално степениште).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, interesting lighting and good quality -- Spurzem 16:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TAXI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Spiral stairs (спирално степениште).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spiral stairs (спирално степениште).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:TAXI.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TAXI.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Butterfly FP

JEE's remark is just; there is a determination error. It is a Morphinae. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Baroque ceiling frescoes (Ljubljana Cathedral).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baroque ceiling frescoes (Ljubljana Cathedral).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urania leilus (moth).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your Fish-Eye images

Hi PetarM,

I was wondernig: is this the lens you used for your image at FP? If so, it might be a good idea to put the images you took with that lens into Category:Taken with Samyang 7.5mm f/3.5 UMC. The camera didn't record the lens in the EXIF data and I always find that an interesting piece of information, especially with unusual lenses like this … Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Spiral stairs (спирално степениште).jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 15:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silphium perfoliatum (Slovenia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crab (Pachygrapsus marmoratus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of National Museum of Slovenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nemanja Bjelica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Fisheye projection

Hi PetarM, Mile,

I thank you for your message I've read very carefully, following the link and learned about the fishe eye projection.

I'm not sure I'm convinced, as I am a man and not a fish. Anyway, It was very interesting. Of course I'm not stupid (well, I believe so...), and I understand all what you mean, but at the end, it is a matter of taste. I have a very classical (blocked maybe) point of view about what I think "Commons" is, a documentary repository for descriptive pictures. Shortly: your picture of the staircase is a good document about the fisheye projection, but not about the staircase of the slovenian opera, in my opinion. And I don't understand what "you are ad-hog oppositor" means ("ad-hog" ?). Of course there is nothing personal in my oppose, I just want people in FPC to hear another voice, another "little music". I'm sure (I know) I'm not alone, but I'm alone to dare to say what I think, at the risk of beeing percepted as moron or ignorant...--Jebulon (talk) 08:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hieracium aurantiacum (orange hawkweed) "Inflorescence".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please add the common name in brackets. The scope should also be restricted to "Inflorescence", for the whole plant (habitus) is not visible --Llez (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support I have corrected the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Staircase of the National Museum of Slovenia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Staircase of the National Museum of Slovenia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar ceiling of St. George's Chapel, Ljubljana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serbian Christmas meal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Silphium perfoliatum (Slovenia).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silphium perfoliatum (Slovenia).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staircase of the National Museum of Slovenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great motif but too much jpeg artefacts, especially in the lower half of the image. Please try to reprocess this motif. --Cccefalon 18:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)@Cccefalon: Have a look to the FPC page...--Jebulon 19:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)  Support OK IMO. --C messier 20:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Miloš Teodosić.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The picture is tilted. This needs to be sorted out. Martinvl (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora caerulea (makro close-up).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition, beautiful colors, good quality -- Spurzem 15:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Passiflora caerulea (makro close-up).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passiflora caerulea (makro close-up).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Help

Hi PetarM. Thanks for the edited version of the cathedral. Could you improve this one too? If you want nominate, feel free. ;) 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Altar ceiling of St. George's Chapel, Ljubljana.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altar ceiling of St. George's Chapel, Ljubljana.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel ceiling of Brežice castle (Slovenia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar ceiling of Ljubljana Cathedral (Slovenia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you turn the highlights down to recover the burnt out windows?--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 10:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment I did put a bit lower, but I don't want to go further because it affects also other colors. Extent of overexposition is not in "burnt". --PetarM 17:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)*  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 05:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljubljana Cathedral cupola (Slovenia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you turn the highlights down to recover the burnt out windows?--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 10:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment Would say same here as on previous nom. Burnt means you can see anything, while here details are overexposed at windows but (mainly) still visible. --PetarM 17:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)*  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 05:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hall of Knights north wall (Brežice Castle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymphaea Laydekeri Purpurata (park Tivoli).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 13:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nymphaea Laydekeri Purpurata.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nymphaea Laydekeri Purpurata.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chapel ceiling of Brežice castle (Slovenia).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chapel ceiling of Brežice castle (Slovenia).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms Duchy of Carniola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 19:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sculptures at staircase Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sculptures at staircase Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Help (2)

Hi PetarM. Could you do a vertical correction here?😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks but see the note. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling and cupola of Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 12:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptures at staircase Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slovenian Railways freight train.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Wow my dear!

You're Serbian! I didn't know! Tell me about your country, please. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamarel Falls Mauritius ver II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cupola of Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cupola of Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cupola detail Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand staircase ceiling with Apotheosis of the Renaissance fresco (Kunsthistorischen Museum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archduke Leopold Wilhelm of Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Groufie.jpg

File:Groufie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

1.232.130.37 08:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Groufie.jpg

File:Groufie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

61.254.85.189 12:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Groufie.jpg

File:Groufie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takeataxi (talk) 09:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Archduke Leopold Wilhelm of Austria.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Archduke Leopold Wilhelm of Austria.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Grand staircase ceiling with Apotheosis of the Renaissance fresco (Kunsthistorischen Museum).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand staircase ceiling with Apotheosis of the Renaissance fresco (Kunsthistorischen Museum).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transept ceiling of Saint Spyridon Serbian Orthodox church (Trieste).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Il Palazzo del governo (Piazza Unità, Trieste).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture of Madonna with child and St John (Kunsthistoriches Museum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Transept ceiling of Saint Spyridon Serbian Orthodox church (Trieste).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Transept of Saint Spyridon Serbian Orthodox church (Trieste).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Ayuntamiento, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg

Hi Mile, I am a bit surprised about your upload. Where was there posterization? You just have to mention it and I can fix from the RAW file. Doing changes in a version different from the source is not sustainable and actually, I'd rather people talk to me about needed improvements. Don't get me wrong, I always appreciate feedback but I'd like then to give it a try on my own. Btw, you complained about the top crop being too tight, I fixed that and now you reverted that improvement. I hope you have no problem if I revert to the last version Poco² 21:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 500 dashboard (white).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transept of Saint Spyridon Serbian Orthodox church (Trieste).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for me --Hubertl 07:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sculpture of Madonna with child and St John (Kunsthistoriches Museum).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sculpture of Madonna with child and St John (Kunsthistoriches Museum).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Frescos_of_Orthodox_Church

Category:Frescos_of_Orthodox_Church has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 00:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling and cupola of Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling and cupola of Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballet shoes (Russian ballet school М. Исаева) bw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casio F-91W digital watch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ballet shoes (Russian ballet school М. Исаева) bw.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ballet shoes (Russian ballet school М. Исаева) bw.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casio f91w digital watch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Ezarateesteban 22:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Sigma

Hi,what you suggest? --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

• this [1]?--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flute with musicial notes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Flute with musicial notes.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flute with musicial notes.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible frog (Pelophylax esculentus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Edible frog (Pelophylax esculentus).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edible frog (Pelophylax esculentus).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

ty : ) Lauro Sirgadocontribs 15:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Sigma 2 the revenge

After what you told me I took the 17 70, which slopes? --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commuting by bicycle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Commuting by bicycle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Commuting by bicycle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lorenzo di Magnifico visits king Ferdinand of Aragon in Naples (Palazzo Vecchio, Florence).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Peulle 19:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)