User talk:Pava/Archive 1

Image:Torre velasca dal metrò.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Torre velasca dal metrò.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

-User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Torre velasca 02.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Torre velasca 02.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

-User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Torre velasca 01.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Torre velasca 01.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

-User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:49, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campionario panda 2.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Villages in Alto Adige/South Tyrol[edit]

Category:Villages in Alto Adige/South Tyrol has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 08:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Pava!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:-01 Fiat logo Ecobasic.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please use sub-categories[edit]

When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––FAEP (talk) 14:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn how to categorize files properly[edit]

Hello Pava, please take a look at Commons:Categories, especially Commons:Categories#Categorization_tips and Commons:Categories#Over-categorization.

For example the File:- 01 ITALY Fiat Grande Punto e Punto Evo in snow in Milan.JPG is sorted into the following categories: [[Category:Fiat Punto]][[Category:Fiat Grande Punto]][[Category:Fiat Punto Evo]][[Category:Automobiles in Milan]][[Category:Automobiles in snow]][[Category:Snow in Milan]][[Category:Snow]]. But hence the categories "Fiat Grande Punto" + "Fiat Punto Evo" are subcategories of "Fiat Punto" and "Snow in Milan" is a subcategory of "Snow" this show a massive and intetional overcategorization, done by you. Unfortunately this also shows that you're simply ignoring what the above inserted template should have made clear for you.

In the last few days I corrected many of the mistakes you made and solved some of the problems, thar you're way of categorization caused, but unfortunately I don't have time to explain the matter of categorization to you, so please read and understand what Commons:Categories says and act according to our rules. Thanks in advance --FAEP (talk) 13:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

in the image the subject are two models of "Fiat Punto" I therefore decided to categorize it in the general category, because it contains + models in the same image from one family car, but at the same time I specified models, I think it may be considered a case of "overcat". In addition you have been kind to show me the warning about how to categorize, but since I have shown notice to the second message is less than 24 hours, is not it a little time to warn? Also keep in mind that you're referring to images uploaded in the past--Pava (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Automobiles on holiday in Italy[edit]

Category:Automobiles on holiday in Italy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

.--FAEP (talk) 14:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Automobiles on holiday[edit]

Category:Automobiles on holiday has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

.--FAEP (talk) 14:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war in File:Ochre Porsche 997 GT3 3.8 in front of the Lamborghini São Paulo dealership.jpg[edit]

Ciao. Ho dato un'occhiata alla cronologia. Sinceramente posso capire la motivazione di alcune delle tue rimozioni (anche se non credo siano corrette, poi ti spiego), ma altre non tanto. Premesso che le note non sostituiscono mai le categorie, e che in Commons:Categories non c'e' scritto proprio tutto, vediamo le categorie attuali:

Queste mi pare non siano oggetto di edit war.

Queste sono le categorie che vorresti rimuovere; secondo te non sono opportune perche' non riguardano il soggetto principale della fotografia. Di solito pero' in Commons si categorizza non solo in base al soggetto principale, ma anche agli altri elementi della fotografia, se e' utile e se e' appropriato. In questo caso, Category:Lamborghini dealerships mi sembra azzeccato perche' in effetti si nota bene un concessionario Lamborghini sullo sfondo: per farti un esempio, se un domani volessi la foto di un concessionario Lamborghini e non la trovo, potrei tagliare questa. Quindi, anche se non e' il soggetto principale della foto e si non vede benissimo, e' utile, alla fin fine. Anche Category:Lamborghini Gallardo coupes non e' cosi' ridondante: sicuramente si intravedono solamente queste auto, ma se avessi bisogno di una foto in cui compaiono (seppur di sfuggita) una Porsche e una Lamborghini potrebbe venirmi utile questa (esistono strumenti esterni che incrociano le categorie). Category:Buildings in São Paulo City in effetti non e' cosi' appropriata, anche secondo me sarebbe da rimuovere, ma inutile fare un'edit war solo per rimuovere una categoria ridondante (non e' sbagliata, perche' effettivamente l'edificio c'e', si vede ed e' in quella citta').

Category:Automobiles facing left

Questa sinceramente non ho capito perche' la vuoi rimuovere, forse ti e' scappata (mi pare innegabile che la macchina sia fotografata da sinistra).

Ripeto, capisco le tue motivazioni perche' alcune categorie sono un po' "stiracchiate", ma mi pare inutile star li' a convincere l'utente di questa cosa; molti sono convinti che vada categorizzato quasi tutto quello che si vede nell'immagine (un po' come in en.wiki, che categorizzano moltissimo rispetto a it.wiki). Questo e' un progetto a livello mondiale, quindi alcuni utenti, magari abituati a categorizzare a manetta su en.wiki, sono portati a farlo anche qui, ed e' difficile convincerli a cambiare abitudini (e poi chissa' chi ha torto o ragione). Bisogna un po' venirsi incontro e vedere se la cosa e' cosi' dannosa da combattere per ottenerla; questa non mi pare il caso, conviene lasciar perdere.--Trixt (talk) 21:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC) Poscritto: sempre per il discorso delle abitudini di utenti di altri Paesi, molti rispondono nella loro talk anziche' sulla tua (probabilmente sono abituati coasi' e neanche ci pensano ad avvertirti)[reply]

Tra l'altro volevo raccomandarti una maggior attenzione nel categorizzare: qui hai messo a Torino un edificio che sta a Roma. Per il resto, ti ha detto tutto Trixt: non ingaggiare edit-war sulle categorie, è improduttivo e, in fondo, risponde all'uso anglosassone di categorizzare quasi tutto il categorizzabile. Tieni presente che questo è un immenso archivio di 12 milioni tra foto, video e file audio, a disposizione di tutti i progetti Wikimedia. C'è bisogno di categorie il più dettagliate possibile, altrimenti molto materiale rimarrebbe inutilizzato o inutilizzabile perché non si saprebbe come cercarlo (vedi Automobili rosse...). -- Blackcat (talk) 00:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Z Fiat Barchetta lavandino Torino Museo.jpg[edit]

File:Z Fiat Barchetta lavandino Torino Museo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

The TV screen depicts a copyright protected work. That makes this a derivative work and thus a copyright violation. Vera (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fw: Category:Salón del Automóvil de Vigo :)[edit]

Great, I've gotta do it next year. --. HombreDHojalata.^talk 17:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for for one week. The reason for the block is incivility, edit warring, abuse of multiple accounts, and vandalism (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Please take the next week to decide whether you want to be a useful member of Commons who will obey the rules or a nuisance who breaks them.

I have blocked your sockpuppets Pava and Serenato permanently. If you create any more sockpuppets, Pava will also be blocked permanently. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 38.JPG[edit]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 38.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:' 12 - ITALY - fìdaty e merchandising Esselunga.jpg[edit]

File:' 12 - ITALY - fìdaty e merchandising Esselunga.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 19:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:' 12 - ITALY - Catalogo Olivari 2012 02.jpg[edit]

File:' 12 - ITALY - Catalogo Olivari 2012 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 19:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:' 11 - ITALY - Evento Olivari - nuovo catalogo - Milano.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:' 11 - ITALY - Evento Olivari - nuovo catalogo - Milano.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:' 11 - ITALY - Evento Olivari - nuovo catalogo - Milano.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 19:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 42.JPG[edit]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 42.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 19:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Milk Granarolo Only italian Milk high quality fresh milk (whole milk) and Yogur 5 cereals HQ.JPG[edit]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:" 12 - ITALY - Milk Granarolo Only italian Milk high quality fresh milk (whole milk) and Yogur 5 cereals HQ.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 11.jpg[edit]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 11.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Dino fumaretto elia billoni.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dino fumaretto elia billoni.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dino fumaretto elia billoni.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Vera (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 29.JPG[edit]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 29.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 39.JPG[edit]

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 39.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 20:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:' 12 ITALY - TURIN - cioccolaTò 26.jpg[edit]

File:' 12 ITALY - TURIN - cioccolaTò 26.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pacco automobile.JPG[edit]

File:Pacco automobile.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:500 Topiary.jpg[edit]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:500 Topiary.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black_marbles[edit]

Category:Black_marbles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Lysippos (talk) 13:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License changes[edit]

Please refrain from changing file licenses of other users, only the creator may change a license. You'll be blocked if you don't stop it as it's a copyright violation. --Denniss (talk) 00:50, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ducati[edit]

This is your last warning. Stop your vandalism!--FAEP (talk) 01:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hight_Quality[edit]

Category:Hight_Quality has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

– Wdchk (talk) 21:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template permission[edit]

See User talk:R. Engelhardt --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automobile spoilers[edit]

I answered on my talk page, see User_talk:FAEP#Category:Automobile_spoilers_and_this_image_of_Alfa_Romeo_MiTo

File:"12 - ITALY - Dino Fumaretto al Milano Film Festival 2012 43.JPG[edit]

File:"12 - ITALY - Dino Fumaretto al Milano Film Festival 2012 43.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jonund (talk) 09:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yesssssssssssssssss-[edit]

-sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

richiesta informazioni[edit]

Ciao Pava. Hai la mia risposta al bar italiano. Saluti, --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:52, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Made_in_Italy[edit]

Made in Italy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FAEP (talk) 01:51, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sei partito con lancia in resta :)[edit]

Ma io non sono un mulino a vento. La risposta è si! :) Se guardi i miei contributi sembra che siano stati sparati a sale. Ma... Allora sto sfollando la categoria Black sedans. Se guardi bene prima di apparentemente toglierle da una categoria e non metterla in un altra (come hai pensato tu :) le ho messe nella categoria 2000s black sedans, che è una sottocategoria di Black sedans, quindi mi dispiace nessuna lacuna. La prossima volta riuscirai a beccarmi in castagna questa volta ti è andata male :) A parte gli scherzi siccome nelle auto c'è il caos sto risalendo dal basso per sistemare le categorie e per fare prima sto usando dei template di navigazione che categorizzino automaticamente vedi da category:red Audi sedans in su ed è più semplice inserirli in più categorie contemporaneamente. Per questo tutti quei link rossi. Poi li elimino a gruppi. Comunque grazie per avermelo ricordato. Anzi se mi vuoi dare una mano... :)--Pierpao.lo (listening) 02:11, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Guarda che io scherzavo. Per l'aiuto ti ringrazio, prima devo mettere giù due istruzioni decenti--Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikivoyage[edit]

Da regolamento no, però ci possono stare. Comunque perderai dei voti perché gli altri hanno già incominciato. Comunque saranno i votanti a scegliere. Per ora contatto l'organizzatore per informarlo. Penso non ci saranno problemi. grazie per averli proposti. Raoli ✉ (talk) 13:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Si non c'è problema, ma naturalmente parti svantaggiato. grazie --Raoli ✉ (talk) 14:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 11 ITALY FERRARI 458 in competition (focus on flap and headlamp).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Auditorium Parco della Musica (Rome)[edit]

Ciao Pava, data la probabile cancellazione di tutte queste immagini ci stavamo chiedendo se potessi creare per l'Auditorium Parco della Musica qualcosa di uguale a questo File:" 12 - ITALY - NO FOP Pirellone in ITALY.png. Grazie. è una battaglia che sto combattendo anche nella vita reale spiegando a molte persone questa questione. Spero di non essere il solo. :) Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:41, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per l'interessamento. Spero non richieda più di 15 minuti. Raoli ✉ (talk) 04:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oltre a leggere il consiglio qui Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Auditorium_Parco_della_Musica_(Rome) mi è venuta una grande idea. Tu hai ritagliato quell'immagine delle rovine dalla foto dell'Auditorium no? Perchè non scrivere "Dell'Auditorium è rimasto solo questo" e mostri l'immagine delle rovine sotto. Avrebbe doppio significato e la protesta verrebbe anche accentuata. In pratica se mostri le rovine fai intendere a molti che l'arte italiana è in decadenza e addirittura possono essere rappresentate solo rovine cioè edifici distrutti. Inoltre mostrando le rovine fai anche pensare al fatto quanto sia antica la legislazione italiana e in rovina lei stessa porti con se anche tutti i più bei fiori dell'ingegno italiano. Direi quindi di sfumare un po' sui bordi le rovine e creare due versioni: una senza quest'idea delle rovine come la prima versione che hai fatto solo rendendola più verticale e la seconda sempre rendendola verticale ma anche con le rovine. Dici che è folle tutto questo? --Raoli ✉ (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, tutto bene, ho letto solo ora l'intervento. Va bene hai ragione, però bisognerebbe farla più verticale per apparire in più superficie della pagine in modo che si legga il testo. no? :=) Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Questa File:" 12 - ITALY - NO FOP Parco della musica verticale.png è perfetta! Sei stato molto bravo. è venuta davvero bene. Grazie --Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:06, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Si è corretto. Basta avere delle alternative per l'immagine, ora ce le abbiamo. Tanto nella voce sull'auditorium ci sono più immagini da rimpiazzare. Vedrai che protesta che facciamo (chi vuole farla, è inteso)! Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:21, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vabbene, solo infobox. ;) Ciao Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:22, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Caricamento foto da Flickr[edit]

Non tutte le foto che sono su Flickr puoi caricarle su Commons. Puoi caricare solo quelle che nel campo licenza hanno scritto o cc-by o cc-by-sa. Le altre non le considerare se no ci rimani male. La foto della rivista non la puoi caricare poiché non ha nessuna di queste due licenze. Comunque se usi quello strumento praticissimo, se gli dai il link della foto non te la fa caricare. Se vuoi caricare tutti i file di un album non esiste uno strumento. Tocca farlo a mano. Probabilmente però ti sarà utile un software di cui non ti svelo le caratteristiche, ti dico solo che si chiama "Commonist" ma non ha nulla a che vedere con l'ideologia. Appena l'hai scoperto e utilizzato ti invito a scoprire i nuovi gadget di Commons. Molti dei quali nemmeno avresti immaginato che esistessero. Appena hai fatto, fischiami e ti dico uno strumento che roba in massa anche senza amministratore. Buone scoperte, speriamo non ti deludano! :) Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Se vuoi modificare in massa molte cose e aggiungere o sostituire del testo in più file o categorie di consiglio di copiarti il codice del punto 1 di questa discussione al Bar Commons:Bar_italiano#Traduzioni Ciao Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nel tuo common.js. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 12:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ti aggiunge un link nella casella degli "Strumenti" (nel menù di sinistra) che si chiama "Operazioni in massa". Se ci clicchi si apre una prima finestra che ti chiede quale categoria o pagina operare e poi scegli quello che ti pare. La risposta è stata tarda, ma stavolta è per una cosa di Wikidata che mi ha rubato tempo. Come sta andando la verticalizzazione di quell'immagine? :) Raoli ✉ (talk) 18:33, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dico un po' più alta non troppo. Raoli ✉ (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acquario di Genova[edit]

Per la stessa ragione penso che anche queste (forse però qui qualcuna se ne salva) debbano essere eliminate. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Acquario di Genova Caricheresti l'immagine base cosicché non ti dovrò più rompere e far perdere tempo in futuro? Per esempio ora per l'acquario di genova un bel pescetto tipo questo non è male File:Genova akwarium 16.jpg. In peschi non sono in Copyright ancora! :) Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:59, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ma porcamiseria! Ci sono anche queste foto che ho raccolto in questa pagina personale. Ti giuro sono sfinito, continuo domani. Con queste che ci facciamo? La mancata libertà di panorama vieta anche foto di interni. Quindi anche tutte quelle foto. L'assurdo comunque è che ho scelto solo quello che mi è capitato, non tutto. Se continuassi verrebbe eliminato circa il 70% delle foto sull'Italia attuale. Rimarremmo con foto del 1850 o comunque prima del 1975, tranne le chiese appunto (a meno che non siano in territorio italiano). Sono rimasto shockato e non riesco ancora a pensare come sia possibile ciò. La cosa assurda è che finchè non ti rileggi cosa comporta la mancanza della libertà di panorama pensi che puoi caricare tutte le foto che vuoi, invece puoi caricare solo quelle autorizzate dal Ministero dei beni culturali. In Italia vi sono poche eccezioni. A parte, come già detto i palazzi d'epoca in foto d'epoca poco altro. Naturalmente lo scopo di quell'elenco non è proporle tutte in botto. Mi ammazzerebbero, ma capire se rimanendo fermamente con la legge davanti si riescono a trovare delle foto che possono andare. Quelle in quella categoria sono spacciate, ma milioni e milioni di altre foto con lo stesso problema. Finora nessuno ha fatto niente. Mi domando perché? Comunque tutti i file cancellati potranno sempre essere ripristinati. Sono dispiaciutissimo di aver scoperto che tutti questi file sono da cancellare. Ci stanno anche i miei in mezzo, ma "dura lex, sed lex". Finchè ci sta bisogna rispettarla, ma ripeto che a me sembra sempre più una legge solo per farci guadagnare le lobby o i nostri cari politici. è pazzesco. Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Però le foto degli interni come degli esterni non sono consentite. Avendo la propria fisionomia radicalmente è soggetto al copyright sul diritto d'autore. Per le macchine non saprei. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Se l'intervento fosse conservativo sarebbe perfetto. A ben guardare prima e dopo non sembra essere conservativo. Non ci perdere tempo. A me non sembra conservativo però se ci credi tu ci voglio credere anch'io. L'elenco comunque non si muove da là. Vorrei raccogliere altre immagini prima di effettuare la maxi richiesta. Adesso lasciando da parte il museo dell'automobile che non è proprio un caso FoP chiarissimo mi metterei a trovarne altri più plateali. Ti andrebbe di aggiungere in quella sottopagina altri possibili casi in cui l'immagine non è in libertà di panorama? --Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ho trovato quello che serviva e fortunatamente non devi leggere un testo unico ma una voce di Wikipedia (che è pure solo in italiano): Intervento di restauro e risanamento conservativo. Leggi da "riportare l'edificio ad un preciso momento della sua epoca .... mai costruite (variazione di forma, sagoma, volume e superficie)", però se vedi questa figura noterai che in Italia il diritto di Panorama proprio non esiste, quindi Commons non accetta nè foto di interni, nè esterni prima del decesso dell'architetto o progettista di essi. C'è sempre qualcuno che l'ha progettato. Per quanto riguarda le auto Pininfarina ha disegnato e progettato molte auto. Bisogna stare attenti Pava. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, rimosse. Ora ne sto aggiungendo altre alla pagina Deletion requests/FoP Italy che non saprei dove spostare su Commons. Puoi aggiungerci anche tu quello che trovi. In caso di dubbio su altre cose confrontiamoci come ora. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:58, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La Libertà di Panorama è abbastanza semplice da verificare. Su Napoli non sono sicuro, ma non è mica detto che tutte quelle che stanno nella pagina verranno eliminate. Saranno proposte per l'eliminazione. L'arco di Torino ha anch'esso il copyright essendo stato costruito da un architetto in occasione dei giochi invernali. Le foto sull'Ara pacis (museo) non possono stare. Bada che finora mi sto concentrando solo su edifici moderni, ma sarebbero da mandare in cancellazione per la non-libertà di panorama anche Colosseo e l'Ara Pacis stesso. La semplicità del disegno non conta. Si valuta la semplicità del disegno per immagini come loghi e 2D. Vulcano buono è di Renzo Piano. Noi le segnaliamo. Altri rivedranno e correggeranno dove sbagliato. Penso di sapere il necessario sulle licenze di Commons (tranne, vabbè.. le varie norme di ogni paese) dopo tanto esperienza anche a mie spese. Però certo, se becchi l'amministratore corretto è un conto, altrimenti se ne becchi uno che non gli va, è stanco, è pure arrabbiato ed è prepotente, nulla va come avevi pensato. in linea di massima non mi metterei a fare queste cose se non mi sentissi abbastanza sicuro di quello che faccio, come te anche, credo. Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:00, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Si anche il Colosseo perchè è un bene tutelato da un Ente in questo caso il Ministero dei Beni Culturali. Per pubblicare una foto degli edifici sotto la tutela di un ente è necessario pagare una quota o andare in contro a multe. Comunque quello del Colosseo è un altro esempio dell'ampio ventaglio composto da più casi. Per ora non vorrei trattare questi casi, ma da legge anche foto del Colosseo (per fare un esempio) vanno cancellate da Commons. La soglia dell'originalità non si applica a opere 3D. L'arco di Torino è stato costruito troppo recentemente e siccome l'Italia non ha una legge che permetta di pubblicare foto sotto una licenza libera (con copyright si) di opere recenti allora andrebbero eliminate tutte le sue foto. Questo è il problema: una legge inadatta al nuovo millennio. Lo scotto lo paghiamo naturalmente noi (l'insieme dei cittadini italiani). --Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC) p.s.Dimenticavo di dirti: l'unico caso per palazzi moderni di rimanere su Commons è quello in cui l'immagine mostra l'edificio in costruzione.[reply]

Pareri giunti[edit]

Stamattina sul presto ho chiesto ad un amministratore di revisionare i file di quella pagina e ha detto che va bene eccetto per alcuni file e categorie di file che ho cassettonato o rimosso. Ti invito quindi a riguardare la pagina e leggere i consigli a lato, che sono poi i motivi principali che consentono anche in paesi senza libertà di panorama di pubblicare un'immagine senza contravvenire alla legge. Ciao :) --Raoli ✉ (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for 48 hours, along with FAEP. I'm sorry I have to do this, but this and this are simply not acceptable, regardless of who is right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LdP[edit]

Ti ho scritto su Wikipedia per chiarimenti. Raoli ✉ (talk) 16:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Si ok, ci tengo a chiarire. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 15:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hatchbacks[edit]

When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––FAEP (talk) 23:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:FAEP[edit]

It appears that you two have not learned any lesson from your blocks. Therefore I am indefinitely restricting you from edit warring with FAEP until you can demonstrate that you can work with him. To be more precise (from a technical standpoint), you are disallowed from adding or removing categories on a file description that FAEP has previously edited. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday greetings[edit]

Wishing you the happiest of holidays
and the best new year!

— Vera (talk), December 2012

categorie di marmo per colore[edit]

Ciao, dato che sto caricando delle lapidi di colore nero sono capitato nella Category:Black marbles ed ho seguito la discussione in atto ferma da giugno scorso. Per quanto ritengo sensata l'obiezione IMHO se chi carica è certo che si tratta di marmo di un determinato colore non credo sia una cosa così insana creare una cat per colore diverso (ho appena trovato una lastra di marmo rosso giapponese chiamata rosso corallo...). certo, avendo una competenza specifica si potrebbe dedurre anche che non è marmo nero ma che ne so ardesia (che poi è un marmo o una semplice pietra?) e comunque sarebbe interessante andare a fare una ricerca e scoprire quanti monumenti in pietra (se non in marmo) nera esistono. Che ne dici? Intanto carico la Category:Black stones così ci trovi le "mie" lapidi e ti fai un'idea. Attendo news :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 11:22, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tra l'altro vedo una Category:Stone plaques abbastanza sguarnita per la quantità industriale di lapidi caricate in Commons...--Threecharlie (talk) 11:29, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Palermo tram on a truck[edit]

Ciao, Pava! Why did you call this a Concept vehicle? It is not such, it is a standard unit of a of an established model and brand, the Bombardier Flexity. Unless you warn me otherwise, I'll remove that category. -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monument of Nizami Ganjavi[edit]

Buongiorno, Pava. I'm user from Azerbaijan. The last year in your city, in your beautiful city was erected a monument of a very famous Azerbaijani poet Nizami Ganjavi. This monument was erected in Villa Borghese park (in Viale Madama Letizia). Could you make a photo of this monument and upload it to the Commons? Grazie per il vostro tempo)) --Interfase (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:FAEP/Archive/2012-12-31[edit]

Ho ripristinato le vecchie discussioni nel suo archivio e gli ho lasciato un avviso in talk che le vecchie discussioni non possono essere nascoste. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:35, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Controlli immagini[edit]

Per quell'utente diciamo di seguire quello che ha detto Trixt, cioè lasciare così com'è. Io parto allora domani colla categorizzazione di queste foto [1] dal basso. L'elenco è abbastanza fattibile, mi è capito molto di peggio. ;) Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:54, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

indicami i file che lo faccio io. ;) --Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pava scusami se rispondo a singhiozzo, ma sto impicciato su pedia, Commons, voyage, wmf in maniera impressionante. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Il template PD-ITALY esiste e come su Commons ed è valido nel rispetto di queste cose: Template:PD-Italia/Commons. Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Si che lo puoi infatti. Dato che lui stesso le ha caricate puoi farlo tranquillamente scrivendo nell'oggetto del nuovo caricamento "improve resolution". Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done e ho preso contatti con l'utente. :) --Raoli ✉ (talk) 17:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guarda qui http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Micro_Design_Improvements allora. Sarebbe lo stile della barra di modifica che vedi in en.wiki in asso nei pressi del pulsante salva lo stile che è stato adottato http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WN&action=edit Raoli ✉ (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colonna tetto sansiro.jpg[edit]

File:Colonna tetto sansiro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dega180 (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Il terzo anello e il tetto di sansiro da fuori.jpg[edit]

File:Il terzo anello e il tetto di sansiro da fuori.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dega180 (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interno spogliatoio poltrone.jpg[edit]

File:Interno spogliatoio poltrone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dega180 (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interno spogliatoio.jpg[edit]

File:Interno spogliatoio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dega180 (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poltrone spogliatoio milan sansiro.jpg[edit]

File:Poltrone spogliatoio milan sansiro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dega180 (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sansiro in the sky.jpg[edit]

File:Sansiro in the sky.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dega180 (talk) 20:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sansiro rampe e scale.jpg[edit]

File:Sansiro rampe e scale.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dega180 (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadio SanSiro Gate 14.jpg[edit]

File:Stadio SanSiro Gate 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dega180 (talk) 20:37, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tavolo logo milan nel spogliatoio.jpg[edit]

File:Tavolo logo milan nel spogliatoio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dega180 (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stiamo sfiorando il ridicolo[edit]

La colonna dello stadio è uno degli elementi più originali di san siro, che si ricorda proprio per le sue colonne ad aspirale. Il tavolo del milan contiene il marchio del milan che è sotto copyright.--Dega180 (talk) 20:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non stiamo sfiorando solo il ridicolo, ci siamo dentro. La legge stessa, che va rispettata, dice queste frottole. A te risulta ridicolo, a me pare tragica la cosa anche alla luce di certe affermazioni di uno studio di architettura contattato. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Si, me lo dissi, mi ricordo[edit]

Non serve più il tuo contributo per le icone poichè su Wikipedia non vogliono che la politica si mischi con l'enciclopedia: io gli volevo rispondere a quel punto male, ma il momento era già tragico e ho lasciato perdere. Questo è il motivo per cui non se ne è fatto nulla. L'icona esiste comunque. La vedi qui User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy. Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Si, è chiaro, era questione di tempo per Simpio. Da quello che ho capito è una ragazza di 16 anni. Simpio "sono quella che non capisce..." e 96 mi fa capire che è del 96, poi se vedi su Flickr trovi conferme. Sei stato comunque molto bravo con lei con l'ate della persuasione. :) --Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Juventus Stadium 2.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Capisco l'entusiasmo[edit]

Ma, a parte la tua campagna per le foto italiane, ti sei preso cinque minuti per spiegare con calma e per bene cosa sia una licenza libera, cosa comporti e il fatto che sia irrevocabile? Perché io nella talk di Simpio96 leggo delle richieste accorate che sorvolano completamente il punto, e dalle sue risposte ho come l'impressione le sia stata forzata un po' la mano. Ti sembra normale passare come niente fosse da (C) ad una CC libera per _1600_ foto? O forse sarebbe stato il caso di lavorarci su gradualmente, insegnarle per bene come collaborare, e via dicendo? Non posso farti la morale, ma sicuramente chiederti di fare più attenzione in futuro sì. --Elitre (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sai perché non ti ho potuto aiutare? Perchè sto mandando in cancellazione le foto senza libertà di panorama. è questo il motivo per cui non ti ho contattato per le immagini di Simpio. Per una volta che una persona ha trasmigrato dalla licenza protetta a quella libera non penso che le questioni di etica debbano subentrare. La scelta tra licenza protetta o libera avviene per la maggior parte della persona senza la dovuta informazioni e di solito verso licenze che proteggono piuttosto per quelle che alienano. Per questo credo che se la gente invertirà la tendenza a favore delle licenze libere non sia un male. Sono troppi anni che le licenza protette vengono utilizzate solo per garantire guadagni minimi ai possessori a scapito della libertà delle immagini. Ora se non riusciamo a informare la diretta interessata sui dettagli delle licenze libere non penso sia quello il punto. Caso vuole che il caricante di foto non sa quale sia la differenza tra una licenza alienante (CC-BY-SA) e una proteggente(C). Si da poi il caso che quella protetta è in vita da più tempo e quindi è più conosciuta, mentre l'introduzione della licenza libera è stata abbastanza recente. Lo stesso C di copyright è in voga anche presso la maggior parte dei giovani fotografi ed è abusato, ma penso che se gli stessi fotografi sapessero la differenza tra gli usi in cui la foto va incontro, in molti casi, utilizzerebbero un interruttore per spegnere definitivamente la corrente al copyright nella loro personale produzione fotografica. La scelta di Pava di convincere Simpio a cambiare il tipo di licenza è più che giusta, perchè d'altro canto, nessuno ha spiegato a Simpio cos'è il copyright quando lei ha scelto la licenza C per le sue immagini. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:49, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion 2[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 11 - ITALY - MART Museum Art Contemporary Design Rovereto Trento.JPG

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

È qui l'errore: non sono intese dalla legge come anonime gradinate, rappresentano un'architettura. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non ho la fonte, poiché la legge non dice specificatamente cosa non è protetto dal copyright e cosa no. Inoltre pareri di avvocati non hanno fonte. L'unica cosa che ti posso dire è che forse avresti dovuto partecipare a questa discussione. Penso che avresti capito molte cose utili anche per il futuo, cmq fai sempre in tempo a leggertela w:it:Discussioni aiuto:Copyright immagini/Libertà di panorama/Archivio/2 e w:it:Discussioni aiuto:Copyright immagini/Libertà di panorama/Archivio/3. In ogni caso leggersi anche w:it:Aiuto:Copyright immagini/Libertà di panorama, w:it:Libertà di panorama e tutti e 4 i file pdf da me caricati su Commons in Category:Copyright law of Italy. Per una volta è tutto in italiano. Se invece vuoi capire quale è la direzione presa dal diritto d'autore attuale troverai utilissimo sicuramente questo testo http://www.estig.ipbeja.pt/~ac_direito/Mind_The_Gap.pdf. Ci vorrà del tempo, ma se vuoi capire come stanno le cose, questo è il massimo che posso fare per te solo. Ciao Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Una chiave di lettura importantissima che fa capire la differenza tra il diritto di autore italiano ed il copyright USA e UK è la seguente: la legge italiana, derivante dal diritto romano, protegge l'autore e regola i diritti ad esso concernenti, la legge anglosassone, basata sul common sense (lett. senso comune), protegge e regola la copia/redistribuzione. Da questa differenza sorgono i nostri problemi italiani. Il resto lo capisci dalle lettura che fortemente ti consiglio senza che così dipenda da altri per capire. Non è che le foto rappresentano solo le gradinate, ma le mettono in un contesto ben preciso per cui esse, facenti parte di un sistema/progetto/struttura più grande sono protette allo stesso modo dal diritto di autore. Se l'immagini rappresentasse solo le gradinate sarebbe un conto, ma le foto selezionate non si limitano a questo ma mostrano anche lo stadio, che per forza di cose dovrà avere delle gradinate, quindi il fatto che le possegga implica che l'opera di architettura da proteggere per il diritto d'autore italiano sia la totalità, la somma di più elementi inseparabili nel contesto. Non si può quindi prescindere dal fatto che se una struttura possegga elementi giudicati "standard" essa non sia originale. Non si può quindi affermare che siccome l'opera possiede una vetrata "standard" allora l'opera non può essere protetta dal diritto dell'autore come pure che se l'opera raffigura piloni non originali allora l'opera non è originale: l'opera va giudicata nella sua totalità e non frammentata in tante piccoli parti poichè la creatività dell'autore è data anche dall'originale accostamento di elementi "standard". Vedasi cosa significa creatività o originalità per la legge. La mia prima asserzione mancava di ragionamento, cosa che è mancata per motivi di tempo. Certamente quindi la frase "È qui l'errore: non sono intese dalla legge come anonime gradinate, rappresentano un'architettura." presupponeva questo ragionamento. Forse per questo non si capiva messa là. Le letture... Pava. Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 12 Milan Design Week (Fuorisalone) Brera district 08.JPG

And also:

File:" 12 Milan Design Week (Fuorisalone) Brera district 09.JPG

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 12 - ITALY - Milan Design Week (Fuorisalone) The Secret Garden by Paola Navone and Barovier & Toso 01.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 12 - ITALY - Milan Design Week (Fuorisalone) The Secret Garden by CITCO and Zaha Hadid 02.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 12 - ITALY - Triennale Design Museum - Milan Design Week 2012 (fuorisalone) Triennale di Milano 2.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:' 11 - ITALY - Biennale d'arte moderna di Venezia ( Venice Modern Art ).JPG

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quella sedia non è nulla di industriale. è questo che il caricante non vuole proprio capire. Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Arco_olimpico_di_Torino[edit]

Arco olimpico di Torino has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposta al movimento 5 stelle[edit]

Buonissima idea. Dato che sarebbe una norma soprattutto a favore del web ed in particolare a Wikipedia e quindi Commons tutti gli utenti, ma proprio tutti sono a favore. Anzi per la precisione anche gli utenti del web di altri paesi sono a favore. Come bacino è molto probabile che se ben informato tutto il web è a favore della LdP in Italia. Eventualmente è molto semplice applicare la libertà di panorama nel diritto di autore italiano: basta copiarsi il diritto di autore svizzero. Inoltre ti informo da subito che non esiste nessuna norma chiamata Libertà di Panorama, ma esiste il concetto di LDP per cui quello che è da fare è introdurre questo concetto nel diritto di autore italiano. Maggiori dettagli questa sera. :) --Raoli ✉ (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Women_by_eyes_color[edit]

Category:Women_by_eyes_color has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

124.170.45.136 09:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mass upload / description in Italian[edit]

Hi Pava

Thank you for your comment about adding description in Italian. OK, on my visit to Geneva Motor Show next year I will try to think about it!

Noebu (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Geneva: Lancia / Fiat[edit]

Hi Pava I have published all the photos that I have. The Geneve Motor Show is extremely large, so I didn't have the time to full cover all brands. It seems I missed Lancia + Fiat. Maybe there will be other Commonists to go and make some photos, the Motor Show is open for another 9 days from now. Noebu (talk) 05:54, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Components_of_the_International_Space_Station_made_and_assembled_in_Turin_by_Alenia[edit]

Category:Components_of_the_International_Space_Station_made_and_assembled_in_Turin_by_Alenia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FAEP (talk) 18:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cancellazioni[edit]

Ok, fatto. Ma fixa i link, non mettere i full url quando stiamo parlando di wikilink, per favore. Per quanto riguarda Raoli, purtroppo mi sono accorto tardi che era già stato bandito da un altro progetto per non avere proprio mostrato alcuna collaboratività (wikivoyage). In effetti non credo stia su Wiki a collaborare, ma solo per portare avanti la sua opinione, non importa le conseguenze. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 08:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guarda il mio diff sulla pagina di Jaqen, così ti è chiaro quello che ho detto. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 08:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sì, è che ci sto mettendo un po' di tempo :-) Ti ho detto come la penso al riguardo, secondo me voleva fare uscire il caso politico del "o tutti o nessuno", alterando così il normale flusso di operazioni che vuole che non si facciano campagne massicce ma il problema si affronti piano piano quando viene fuori e si discuta caso per caso. Proporre 10.000 foto per la cancellazione di massa non è un modo di affrontare né risolvere il problema (o almeno quello che lui ritiene un problema). -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 08:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, è un lavoraccio, ha fatto danni che neanche si immagina. Per quanto mi riguarda molti hanno ricaricato su it.wiki, dove infatti si è lamentato di essere stato osteggiato.... -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 08:30, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO la soluzione più pratica è caricarli su it.wiki e lasciare che ne "godano" gli amici di en.wiki. Poi gli altri capiranno che qui si interpreta il FOP in maniera troppo assoluta. In Italia si tende a privilegiare il proprietario del bene, non l'autore. Arriveremmo al paradosso che uno non può pubblicare su commons la foto della propria villa o del palazzo dove abita, se l'ha disegnata Piano o Piacentini. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 08:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao[edit]

Grazie del consiglio, sai essendo nuova di qui, non so ancora bene come funziona, non è molto che carico foto:)
Ci si vede... ciao--Mikystar (talk) 20:01, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie dei consigli[edit]

Grazie per l'aiuto, ho caricato un'altra foto, ho cercato di mettere le categorie, dimmi come ti sembra.--Mikystar (talk) 08:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Pava, per gli utenti maschi non ti ho mai visto così attivo. Ricordati che sono admin e ubi maior .... :D :D :D -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 09:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lettera di accompagnamento nomina Cavaliere di Malta (Fabio Amerighi).jpg[edit]

Ciao Pava, ti ringrazio per l'intervento sul file in questione. Ho aggiunto un'ulteriore considerazione. Io penso che l'user che ha proposto per ben due volte la cancellazione sia in errore e non voglia (come si usa dire recentemente) fare un passo indietro. È come se io non potessi pubblicare il mio diploma di Laurea, finché il firmatario dello stesso (rettore o capo della segreteria universitaria) non sia morto da più di 70 anni. Qui invece stiamo parlando di una modesta lettera di accompagnamento. Il mondo ha il suo fascino perché e vario. Un caro saluto e a sentirci alla prossima :). Se sono in errore, invece, chiedo scusa.--Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 14:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao[edit]

Ciao Pava, ho caricato un'altra foto, non sto caricando ultimamente qui perchè sto lavorando ad un progetto su wikipedia e non ho abbastanza tempo per fare entrambe le cose^^
Più avanti spero di portare altre belle foto!
Una buona domenica.--Mikystar (talk) 10:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bandiere[edit]

Innanzitutto la sintassi delle categorie è sbagliata. Ho visto robe tipo "Arcigay flags" invece di "Flags of Arcigay". Secondo poi, "Flags of Italy" non significa "Bandiere italiane", ma "Bandiere d'Italia", intendendo qualsiasi bandiera appartenente a fattispecie riconducibili all'Italia, non necessariamente le bandiere nazionali (per le quali c'è la categoria National flags of countries). Le bandiere di un'associazione vanno sotto la subcategoria Flags of organisations in Italy‎. La categoria "Flags IN Italy" riguarda le bandiere (qualsiasi) in Italia, per esempio quella degli Stati Uniti appesa al pennone dell'ambasciata a Roma. Non è "Flag of Italy" ma "Flag in Italy"... -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 15:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simpio[edit]

Sì, ho la possibilità di ripristinare ma non voglio mettermi a fare wheel war contro un altro amministratore. Preferisco parlare con Fastily e chiedergli di rivedere la sua decisione perché penso ci sia stato un difetto di comunicazione. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 21:28, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In attesa di risposta. Non è detto arrivi... -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 15:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:.599 "gto" - Flickr - Tom Wolf - Automotive Photography.jpg[edit]

Hi Pava. You just had the same impression as me. If you take a look at the talk page you'll see I wrote (in French) : Description is not good. This picture is taken in front of Café de Paris, quai des Passagers, 14 Honfleur (France) and is located 49.399328,0.129969 witch is 11 Rue de la Cour du Pont, 14 Villerville (France). Illogical !!! --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 00:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, translation

Done. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 13:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:3-4 ant Gobi.jpg[edit]

File:3-4 ant Gobi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 22:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Horse colours[edit]

Please trust my judgement with horse colour categorisation, as I have worked with the horse categories for quite some time and know their contents rather well. The horses I recently removed from category:White horses are not en:White (horse) but en:Grey (horse), which is a very common colour for horses, and of which we have dozens of nice photos already. The decategorised photos do not have any particular value to add to that collection. --Pitke (talk) 09:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

European shorthair cat[edit]

Hi! I classify a lot of cat pictures. The category Category:European Shorthair is for the breed European Shorthair, not for the cat you can find everywhere (Category:Domestic cats). It's a common misunderstanding ^^. So I changed all categories in your cat pictures, it's just for inform you. Regards, --Abujoy (talk) 08:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, European shorthair is a breed of cat (there is some informations about the breed here), that means it is the opposite of a stray cat. A "real" European shorthair is a cat raised by a breeder, with well-known origin.

But your remark is very instructive because I just see that the category "Stray cats" doesn't exist and would be usefull. --Abujoy (talk) 18:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:- 01 atomobile mania.jpg

And also:

File:" 12 - ITALY - Manichino carrozzeria Bertone per Alfa Romeo Giulietta Sprint - wood tecnical model.JPG[edit]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Manichino carrozzeria Bertone per Alfa Romeo Giulietta Sprint - wood tecnical model.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cancellazioni[edit]

Guarda, Pava, mi sono stufato di fare le lotte contro i mulini a vento. Si prendono leggi italiane fatte male, vaghe e proprio per questo inapplicabili e inefficaci e si pretende di interpretarle con il metro anglosassone, non sapendo neppure che qui dalle parti nostre una legge potrebbe perfino non essere applicata se mai invocata o se per prassi non vi si ricorre... e tra l'altro ci vuole una settimana solo per spiegare il concetto, sperando che l'altrui lo capisca. Quando ci stanno queste cose non mi devi contattare a giochi fatti, ma a cancellazione in corso. Dopo, è fatica sprecata andare a fare i capziosi e a spiegare i perché e i percome. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 15:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Esatto Pava, (porca miseria), ieri quando sono intervenuto avevo intenzione di scrivere proprio a Sergio per farlo intervenire nella proposta di cancellazione, poi mi sono scordato! Interessante questa cosa "leggi italiche all'anglosassone". Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate deleted content[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Your image or other content was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

.--FAEP (talk) 16:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Classico di Tizio"[edit]

Ciao, dire che è un "classico di <Tizio>" cancellare "ignorando la discussione" a me suona come un attacco personale. Suggerisco di evitare ogni generalizzazione sulle attività degli altri utenti. --Nemo 18:37, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Se l'hai dimenticato non è mia intenzione rivangare. Non è importante il passato, tienilo presente per il futuro. ;) --Nemo 20:14, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Manichino di legno[edit]

Se ti interessa ho fatto Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:.22_12_-_ITALY_-_Manichino_carrozzeria_Bertone_per_Alfa_Romeo_Giulietta_Sprint_-_wood_tecnical_model.JPG. E' incredibile come l'enciclopedia riesca a crescere nonostante il ridursi del QI.--Bramfab (talk) 10:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Io sto provando a spiegare, magari qualcuno con un barlume di comprendomio salta fuori, come vedi la discussione e' in corso. Bramfab (talk) 22:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No si riferisce alla UD successiva. Bramfab (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non sono pratico di commons e penso che non lo sarò mai, essendo in gran parte dominato da un basso profilo di QI, fenomeno col quale non sono mai riuscito, anche nella vita reale, ad entrare in empatia. Penso che la resistenza alla cancellazione stia solamente nella difesa dell'orgoglio personale, e nel non voler riconoscere esternamente che si e' sbagliato, credo che nell'intimo abbia capito l'errore di valutazione commesso. Mi sembra di capire che qui, come nella wiki inglese, gli amministratori fanno il bello e cattivo tempo e prima di rimuoverne uno ce ne vuole. Per cui se non viene rimessa trova un titolo adeguato e che non crei ambiguita', e poi carica l'immagine nella wiki italiana. D'altronde per capire certe cose occorre anche una certa cultura e conoscenza delle tecniche lavorative del passato, oppure avere l'umiltà di riconoscere la propria ignoranza sul soggetto e non ergersi a esperti ingegneria meccanica.--Bramfab (talk) 06:52, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jim è un bravo amministratore e anche una persona intellettualmente onesta, però gli anglosassoni vedono il copyright in maniera molto severa. Se Commons fosse nato in Italia molto probabilmente non avremmo COM:PRP. In Italia si fa causa per il condominio, in America per il copyright. Comunque, essendo io intervenuto in discussione con un parere, non posso essere io a ripristinare eventualmente l'immagine, essendo una delle parti in causa. Dovrebbe essere un altro amministratore che non sia io a farlo, se giudica le ragioni per ripristinare più valide di quelle per tenere la fotografia in oggetto fuori da Commons. Comunque, ribadisco, per me quello non è né un manichino né un modello in scala, ma una dima, e quindi non soggetta a copyright. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 13:33, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 13 - ITALY - monuments of Milan in art - marking pen drawings colored by children - Duomo di Milano.jpg[edit]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:" 13 - ITALY - monuments of Milan in art - marking pen drawings colored by children - Duomo di Milano.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

And also:

These images are derivative works, please read about Derivative work. Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 13:13, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ti devo chiedere un favore[edit]

Ho esaminato la foto che mi hai segnalato, secondo me si può fare poco per questi motivi: 1. "not very sharp" - dice tutto e non dice niente, il fuoco tecnicamente mi sembra accettabile, il resto è soggettivo, c'è anche chi apprezza immagini morbide (pensa all'effetto flou che i fotografi adottano in molte situazioni), insomma, è questione di gusti. 2. "quite noisy" - più che disturbo a me sembra "grana", normale in quelle condizioni di luce e comunque siamo di nuovo alle prese con gusti espressivi personali, in molti casi la grana è voluta. 3. "better composition possible" - qui invece siamo totalmente nel gusto personale! La composizione è data proprio da come il fotografo vede e intende trasmettere l'immagine. Quindi, ho applicato un filtro di aumento della nitidezza nell'area del fanale, sperando di dare un impressione di maggiore affilatura, poi ho sfocato le aree della carrozzeria per ridurre un po' la grana, sulla composizione non toccherei nulla, si potrebbe tagliare per portare il soggetto della foto (il fanale) nei classici nodi a 1/3 e 2/3 orizzontale/verticale come insegna la scuola canonica di fotografia, ma si ridurrebbe l'impatto dell'area di carrozzeria rossa che invece mi sembra importante, direi che a me piace così (mi piaceva anche prima dei miei ritocchi). Se a te piaceva di più prima, fai pure il revert senza timore! -- Fulvio ³¹⁴ 07:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:- ITALY - Z Gatto PaperCamera 1.jpg[edit]

File:- ITALY - Z Gatto PaperCamera 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:- ITALY - Z Gatto PaperCamera 2.jpg[edit]

File:- ITALY - Z Gatto PaperCamera 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 22:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:12 - ITALY - Coltello da enologo - Oenology knife tool 4.jpg[edit]

Si prega di notare che "Category:Corkscrew (tool)" ⊂ "Category:Bottle openers". -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:54, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,02 € Italia - Mole Antonelliana - Turin - Repubblica Italiana.jpg[edit]

File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,02 € Italia - Mole Antonelliana - Turin - Repubblica Italiana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pinus pinaster[edit]

Ciao e grazie per aver creato Pinus pinaster in Italy! Ti pregherei però di non moltiplicare le categorie, l'hai infatti aggiunto a foto di pini che sono Pinus pinea! Grazie --Fontema (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Victory Column at FPC[edit]

Hello Pava,

I have made some improvements in view of your points. Maybe you like the picture now. Thanks for proofing. Best regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cap San Diego-DSC 0417.jpg[edit]

Hi Pava,

could you please explain the reason of putting the license text under "permission" and the details of reusing under "License"? Regards, --P e z i (talk) 17:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried now a different version that's perhaps less confusing for other languages. Could you have a look on it and tell me your opinion? Ciao --P e z i (talk) 20:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,01 € Italia - Castel del Monte - UNESCO - Repubblica Italiana.jpg[edit]

File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,01 € Italia - Castel del Monte - UNESCO - Repubblica Italiana.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,05 € Italia - Colosseum - Colosseo - Anfiteatro Flavio in Rome.png

Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,10 € Italia - The Birth of Venus (Botticelli) - Nascita di Venere.png

Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,20 € Italia - Unique Forms of Continuity in Space - Umberto Boccioni - Forme uniche della continuità nello spazio.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,50 € Italia - Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius and Piazza del Campidoglio, Michelangelo, Roma.png

Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aircraft_engineering[edit]

Aircraft engineering has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

PeterWD (talk) 16:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:" 02 - ITALY - 1 € Italia - Vitruvian Man - Uomo vitruviano - Leonardo da Vinci - 1euro.jpg

And also:

File:1 euro Italia 2002.png

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 Giant Fiat 500 .jpg[edit]

#invoke:Autotranslate Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 04:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:500 Crash Torino Museo Automobile.jpg[edit]

File:500 Crash Torino Museo Automobile.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Template:Idw/lang

Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 04:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fiat 500 in via Monte Napoleone!.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 04:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:500 Torino Museo Automobile.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 04:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Pava[edit]

Ciao, ho ricevuto un messaggio simile a quelli che hai ricevuto tu: dice Commons:Deletion requests e poi sotto l'immagine (che è questa: File:Santuario-MLacrime-2.jpg)ci è scitto che il file non è un "FOP" dice che "There is no FOP in Italy" ... ma che cos'è questo FOP? Puoi darmi un consiglio su cosa fare? Grazie.--Mikystar (talk) 11:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pava lascia stare ho risposto da me, ho scoperto cosa era il FOP, grazie lo stesso.--Mikystar (talk) 12:36, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:" 07 - ITALY - Commemorative 2 euro coins of Italy - Trattati di Roma - 2007.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 12:50, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Torre di Vendicari[edit]

Ciao Pava ho visto che hai candidato una foto da me caricata come immagine di qualità, mi fa piacere^^ grazie e ciao.--Mikystar (talk) 12:54, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Stasera la voto... mi serve tempo per scrivere in inglese:)--Mikystar (talk) 15:22, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bene, ma qual'è la pagina per votare? Perchè non la trovo... e quindi non so dove votare:)--Mikystar (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Pava, ma com'è finita poi con la foto? La posso votare o no?--Mikystar (talk) 08:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pava anche se poi non mi hai detto come si votata l'ho intuito da sola e ho votato in una delle pagine che ho trovato sotto la foto "torre di vendicari", ho votato in quella favorevole per la vetrina, ma onestamente non penso che passerà, ho visto commenti non favorevoli, ma non fa niente se non va ci riproveremo con un'altra immagine ancor più bella^^ ciao.--Mikystar (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Alfa Romeo MiTo Red Models Mondo 11.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 11:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Colonna tetto sansiro.jpg

And also:

File:Il terzo anello e il tetto di sansiro da fuori.jpg

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 10:00, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Preparazione concerto di zucchero a san siro.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 06:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:" 04 - ITALY - United Nations World Food Program - WFP - Programma alimentare mondiale ONU 2004 Roma.png

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 16:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Alfa Romeo Giulietta White Models Motorama 09.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Alfa Romeo Giulietta White Models Motorama 07.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Alfa Romeo Giulietta White Models Motorama 10.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Alfa Romeo MiTo Red Models Mondo 14.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Alfa Romeo MiTo Red Models Mondo 07.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Alfa Romeo MiTo Red Models Mondo 08.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Parere su cancellazione[edit]

Un parere, leggendo la voce in questione, posso darlo volentieri. Solo non capisco perché tu mi abbia chiamato qui su Commons e non su Wikipedia in italiano... avrai avuto le tue ragioni. Comunque, ti prometto che appena posso controllo la voce e ti dico che ne penso sulla talk in ita. Ciao.--Mikystar (talk) 12:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lo farò. Penso che tu abbia rischiato di incorrere nella "campagna elettorale", anche se non sono molto pratico di queste cose. In ogni caso, ti basterebbe segnalare la discussione in modo neutro, senza esprimere il tuo parere. Poi, ripeto che non non sono esperto, non so se si applica alle discussioni o solo alle votazioni. -- Fulvio ³¹⁴ 14:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lasciamo stare questo episodio.[edit]

Pava ciao, rispetto a quanto accaduto ieri su Wiki.it volevo dirti ancora che mi dispiace... avrei dovuto avvisarti per tempo che ciò che ci stavi chiedendo di fare era contro le regole, ma presumendo la buona fede abbiamo risposto tutti e tre ognuno con il nostro punto di vista.

Penso che questo episodio sia servito anche a te per capire che non si finisce mai di imparare... nonostante la tua esperienza su Wiki! Quindi superiamo la discussione e andiamo avanti.

p.s.

Un consiglio: Wikipedia non è né elitaria né a senso unico... semplicemente è molto collaborativa e vanno rispettati e compresi i pareri della comunità, per il bene dell'enciclopedia stessa.

Spero che ci risentiremo presto! Ciao.--Mikystar (talk) 13:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao[edit]

Mi dispiace per quello che è successo. Tu sei un utente molto attivo e dispiace quando ci sono delle incomprensioni--Pierpao.lo (listening) 15:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

si--Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Alfa Romeo MiTo Red Models Mondo 12.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate .InfiniteHiveMind. ([[User talk:.InfiniteHiveMind.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How is that possible? since I have warned for the first time for copyright infringement when I was stuck in the past is not even an hour. It seems a little 'hasty and libertine this blocking action (which I did not know and many pictures were supervised by other directors who have not denied anything) Do not confuse with the FOP COPYVIOL. Here it is not very clear --Pava ([[User talk:Pava#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:11, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:"14 -ITALY - Mario Draghi - Banca Centrale Europea BCE - 10 Euro e 5 Euro.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola _talk 16:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 - ITALY - Crema mani - hand care cream.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Эlcobbola _talk 16:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:" 12 - ITALY - Dreamworks " Zenzy " Pan di Zenzero Peluche ( plush ) Esselunga (Shrek).JPG

And also:

File:" 12 - ITALY - Dreamworks " Zenzy " Pan di Zenzero Peluche Esselunga (Shrek) with black cat.JPG

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola _talk 16:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:" 12 - ITALY - Alfa Romeo MiTo Red Models Mondo 13.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola _talk 16:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manichino carrozzeria Alfa Romeo Giulietta Sprint.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Эlcobbola _talk 16:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:- 01 plastico sede bertone.jpg

And also:

File:Plastico sede bertone2.jpg

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola _talk 17:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Mongoloide"[edit]

Hello user:FAEP :) . Sorry for the word "mongoloide" was used in a jocular term, it was not absolutely revolt so offensive to anyone --Pava ([[User talk:Pava#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Devi inserire il link alla pagina utente in modo che venga gli venga notificato il messaggio per eempio "user:pava sorry....". Mi dispiace per quello che è successo. ciao--Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:I18n[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Block changed from indef to 3 mo. total after consulting with Sergio --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 20:11, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hedwig_in_Washington thanks for your understanding and cooperation. It all happened so fast that I did not even have time to explain and understand why they are being blocked. But users have told me and helped me in this thing, I also thank them as well as you. I am sorry that you thought that I could persevere on the violation of the rules (whit SP case of , I'm on wikimedia for 8 years and never once thought to violate the rules (voluntarily). I hope you will help me to be left in peace by those who pursued me for mistakes made at the dawn of time. (because it attacks me and discredit me for 3 years and it hurts me and my contributions, it has become harmful and unsustainable, and this story has also damaged people, time lost, and contributions lost. who have nothing to do? for what to issues of personal spite?). Where i can work (collaborate) i do it (as i always did, although i always express so turned on my motivations and then has appeared very hard) but this thing i can not do anything about it. tell me how I can act. I do not want take off consideration to anyone but i think her (FAEP) hates me.. is becoming an obsession, check out all my sentences, discredits me and goes around to discredit the other users, it does so continuously for years to old issues that you bring inside. It is not correct that personal issues will bring a user to harm another and commons for no reason in this way. I ask you to kindly help me in solving this thing, because according to it will only create a bad atmosphere. Some time ago, an administrator has blocked me and FAEP to edit wars and has prevented him from correcting my contributions and me, and me as well. I was very happy because finally left me in peace, but he tried to interfere with me in other ways (here on commons, in en.wiki, in it.wiki, everywhere) until today, and here is the result. If the interest is really that there is an improvement, collaboration, something must be done to stop this attack (which lasts for years). I do not want that will be taken sanctions, i just want him to understand that this way is useless and will only lead to other problems. user:FAEP Please read this words, is important that this thing is over, otherwise it will never happen anything good, just do not hurt me, but many other users. for what? for old resentments? this thing is not only hurts me but many users. if you appreciate it, I apologize for any past squabbles, but they are different thoughts on things, you can not see them as personal attacks or vandalism --Pava ([[User talk:Pava#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should stay away from each other as much as possible. If you encounter each other, please talk and don't edit war over nothing. -- Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 19:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I suggested him, too, Hedwig. Clearly, right or wrong, they are not done for stay together. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 07:13, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your suggestions are correct, and I agree with them. I'm two years that i avoid him. While he continues to get to me through other people, as has happened for this block --Pava ([[User talk:Pava#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ciao[edit]

Sei stato bloccato fino al 13 settembre, giorno del mio compleanno fammi il reagalo di essere molto prudente. Io sono d'accordo su tante cose che hai detto e su tanti giudizi che hai dato, ma io certi file non li avrei caricati, qui io sono molto felice e se vuoi ti aiuterò anche file per file, ma tu devi anche imparare ad essere più elastico. Quindi per favore d'ora innanzi prima carichi i file su Wikipedia poi decidiamo se spostarli su commons. Sergio ed altri hanno fatto tanto per aiutarti, non deluderci, non in impegno, che trabocca dalla tua utenza, ma in diligenza. In amicizia. Ciao--Pierpao.lo (listening) 20:44, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@ Pierpao.lo erano file caricati anni fa, quando ero inesperto, (e molto prima del caso FOP dove vige ancora molta confusione) oppure erano file caricati antecedentemente alle discussioni guida che li hanno ritenuti non idonei a commons (modelli d'auto, euro commemorativi), dubito inoltre che sia per questo che mi abbiano bloccato (la segnalazione venne fatta per altri motivi, e anche il caso che riguarda l'utente Flamarial non riguarda copyviol, ma riguardano, guarda caso, "questioni personali" che riguardano gli stessi interessi dell'utente che si diverte a danneggiare me per motivi indipendenti da commons. Non è quindi il copyviol il problema) non è normale che vengano trattati utenti in questo modo e non è normale che un utente danneggi altri utenti per questioni personali e nessuno faccia niente. Comunque se mi sto sbagliando ed è effettivamente questo il motivo (il copyviol), ovvio che farò attenzione e naturalmente mi consulterò con te sui file dove nutro dei dubbi. Se hai questa preoccupazione, hai la mia parola, non ci saranno violazioni (e volontarie non ci sono mai state, se solo mi avessero avvisato prima di bloccarmi, avrei io stesso messo in cancellazioni le immagini, ma senza avviso senza niente blocco immediato, che puzza solo di scusa). Comunque grazie del sostegno :) non ho intenzione di deludere nessuno :) ciao grazie mille di nuovo --Pava ([[User talk:Pava#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:46, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fiat 500 X at Autoshow 2014[edit]

Hello Thesupermat, have you some pics of: Fiat 500X reveled in this days at Mondial de l'automobile de Paris 2014? If yes can you upload it here on wikimedia commons? thank you very much :) --Pava ([[User talk:Pava|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, j'ai quelques photos de cette voiture, je les chargerai sur Commons dés que j'aurais le temps. Bonne journée.--Thesupermat ([[User talk:Thesupermat|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:55, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Finalement, j'ai une photo--Thesupermat ([[User talk:Thesupermat|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Torre Telecom Napoli.JPG

Yours sincerely, Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:" 11 - ITALY - Pratone.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Corridoio - Corridor, Torino Museo Nazionale dell'Automobile.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:" 11 - ITALY (Turin) Fiat Barchetta sink bathroom - Museo Nazionale dell'Automobile di Torino.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:National flag of Italy on racing cars[edit]

Ciao, ho visto che è stato creato il "Categoria:. Bandiera nazionale d'Italia in auto da corsa" Penso che si può aggiungere questa serie di fotografie. Cordiali saluti. François de Dijon ([[User talk:François de Dijon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)(Traduzione automatica)[reply]

Bonjour, j'ai vu que vous avez créé la "Category:National flag of Italy on racing cars". Je pense que cette série de photographies peut y être ajoutée. Cordialement. François de Dijon ([[User talk:François de Dijon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_Tomaso_Pantera_Tour_Auto_2014_Circuit_de_Dijon_Prenois_08.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_Tomaso_Pantera_Tour_Auto_2014_Circuit_de_Dijon_Prenois_10.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_Tomaso_Pantera_Tour_Auto_2014_Circuit_de_Dijon_Prenois_11.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_Tomaso_Pantera_Tour_Auto_2014_Circuit_de_Dijon_Prenois_12.jpg

Ho visto che avevi elencato in una categoria che non conoscevo: Categoria: Numbers on racing cars. Questo mi permetterà di classificare le mie altre immagini di auto. Grazie mille. François de Dijon ([[User talk:François de Dijon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai vu que vous les aviez classé dans une catégorie que je ne connaissais pas :Category:Numbers on racing cars. Cela va me permettre de catégoriser mes autres photos de voitures. Merci beaucoup. François de Dijon ([[User talk:François de Dijon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 12 ITALY female breast with Alfa Romeo.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Kopiersperre ([[User talk:Kopiersperre|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:37, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015[edit]

Anche a te ed a tutti i tuoi cari! -- Fulvio ³¹⁴ 15:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Straquoto, auguri sopratutto di un anno serene e privo di conflitti :)--Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BUON ANNO!![edit]

Ti ringrazio per i graditissimi auguri che ricambio di cuore per te e la tua famiglia :)--Roberto.Amerighi ([[User talk:Roberto.Amerighi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undo The Undertaker WWE Wrestlemania 29 Photo

Category:Bio[edit]

Template:Autotranslate —LX (talk, contribs) 22:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Buon anno[edit]

Ciao Pava, scusa l'immenso ritardo ma ho aperto solo adesso la mia pagina su commons^^ ricambio (anche se siamo a Marzo :D) gli auguri per un buon 2015... del resto siamo solo all'inizio di questo nuovo anno ;) ciao. --Mikystar ([[User talk:Mikystar|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 08 - Lancia Ypsilon "03 - white hatchback facing left.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate OSX (talk • contributions) 03:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Richiedi una borsa "Alessio Guidetti" per Wikimania[edit]

Ciao Pava, ti segnalo il programma borse di partecipazione "Alessio Guidetti" per Wikimania 2015, che potrebbe esserti utile per partecipare al raduno mondiale degli utenti Wikimedia. Abbiamo prorogato i termini, c'è tempo fino alle 23.59 di martedì 28 aprile per fare richiesta.

Ti scrivo perché ho visto che ti dai da fare da queste parti e non hai ancora fatto richiesta. Perdonami se la segnalazione non è di tuo interesse. Nemo 08:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 15 - ITALY - ALFA ROMEO GIULIA QV SuperSport - Arese with Bocelli official premier - 105 years of Alfa Romeo.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez ([[User talk:Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Torre Telecom Napoli.JPG

Yours sincerely, Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Special:AbuseFilter/102[edit]

Hi, Filter from 2012. Is this filter still needed? --Steinsplitter ([[User talk:Steinsplitter|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marchio Alfa Romeo[edit]

File:"15 - ITALY - New Logo Alfa Romeo on rear trunk of Alfa Romeo Giulia 2015.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate GJo ([[User talk:GJo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:"15 - ITALY - New Logo Alfa Romeo on rear trunk of Alfa Romeo Giulia 2015.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Taivo ([[User talk:Taivo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Names of your photos[edit]

Advertising and rating in names is forbidden. Such words as "Italian dream", "Italian super car" are violation of a Criterion#5 of Commons File Renaming policy. Don't do it. Wieralee ([[User talk:Wieralee|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pava: you are trying to position your files higher by using "15. But there is no such shortcut for the year => "15 is not supported by the search engine [2]. Use "2015" instead.

One of main rules of Commons is a NEUTRAL point of view. That is why files should not have such names. Wieralee ([[User talk:Wieralee|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pava: "15 is not supported by the search engine. Sooner or later someone will notice it and will rename all your files.

Try to do photos in HD: 4096 pic. You can also create your own User Category, f.e.

Category:Photographs by User:Pavo

write inside it: [[Category:User categories]] __HIDDENCAT__

Good luck! Wieralee ([[User talk:Wieralee|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:39, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Typical food[edit]

I saw that you recently created Category:Typical food and Category:Typical food of Italy. I understand what you are trying to do here, to have a category for a class of foods that are recognised as traditional specialities. Unfortunately, the word "typical" in English is not completely interchangeable with the Italian "tipico". In English it also can mean "normal", and "regular", so "typical food of Italy" would, for most people, mean something like "what is commonly regarded as Italian food" and the category will fill up with dishes such as spaghetti, pizza, and whatever else is often seen on menus of Italian-style restaurants worldwide. I would suggest to rename the category to something else. What comes to mind are "Category:Traditional food specialities", "Category:Regional food specialities", or "Category:Traditional regional foods", but perhaps someone else can come up with something better. - Takeaway ([[User talk:Takeaway|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Geographical indications and traditional specialities[edit]

Hi again Pava. The Category:Geographical indications and traditional specialities should only contain files and categories of traditional foods which are named after places. So Category:STG can be placed in there, but Category:PAT not because the foods in the last category do not necessarily contain the name of a place (province, region, city, town, village) in the name of the foodstuff itself. - Takeaway ([[User talk:Takeaway|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have now also placed "Category:Products with protected designation of origin of Italy" into "Category:Traditional food of Italy". That means that per COM:OVERCAT, all the subcategories of "Category:Products with protected designation of origin of Italy" do not have to be put into "Category:Traditional food of Italy" any longer. - Takeaway ([[User talk:Takeaway|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:11, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Production standards[edit]

What kind of Category:Production standards do you mean with this category? It could mean anything: standards for producing match sticks for instance. I removed Category:Products with protected designation of origin of Italy from it because "Category:Production standards" is much too broad for this category. I also nominated "Category:Production standards" for deletion because it is much too broadly defined. I advise you to reconsider creating categories. Your English doesn't seem good enough as is shown here above in section "Typical food" but what is more, is that you don't really seem to grasp the category system of Wikimedia. You put main categories into subcategories for instance, such as you did here, and you "forget" parent categories by putting minor categories directly into main categories such as you did here where, if a category should be put into "Category:Production standards", it should be "Category:Protected Designation of Origin". - Takeaway ([[User talk:Takeaway|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DOC[edit]

DOC can mean many things (see en:DOC). I changed it to Category:Denominazione di origine controllata. Please try using full names instead of ambiguous abbreviations. - Takeaway ([[User talk:Takeaway|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:40, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

INGIUSTIZIA[edit]

Ciao Pava, è successa una cosa veramente indegna! e vergognosa! Scusa lo sfogo però io vengo per farmi aiutare e qualcuno, non so chi di preciso ha cancellato la pagina, anziché limitarsi a fare una semplice correzione ha prevalso la cattiveria vera e propria cancellando la pagina, questo è più che razzismo, sono INCAZZATO!!! e non mi interessa del linguaggio possono bloccarmi o bannmarmi per volgarità, non è modo di aggire! Non mi fermerò a questa ingiustizia! Ciao Smitersleon ([[User talk:Smitersleon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Pava scusa il nervosismo di ieri, forse ho esagerato un pò, comunque non ho tutti i torti, alla faccia dell'altruismo, comunque per quelli che mi hanno risposto va bene, ma quelli che non si degnano nemmeno a rispondere sono...non so nemmeno definirli...a parte che non è segno di buona educazione, domandare è lecito rispondere è cortesia, a me se mi dicono di no non insisto più, però lasciare sbattere non è giusto in ogni caso. Comunque a te ti ringrazio per la tua disponibilità poiché sei stato veramente eccellante, vediamo cosa posso fare...ma a parte questo scusami non potresti chiederlo tu? Non conosci qualcuno che non potrebbe dirti di no? Non puoi trovare un tedesco che sia disposto a creare una piccolissima pagina The Game of Death su dewikiquote? simile a quella italiana o a quella inglese, o quasi simile?, tante a me non importa né la qualità né la quantità, a me interessa solo che ci sia, non puoi trovarne uno disponibile? Dai! Pava! Pensi di riuscirci? (Importante: è gradita anche una risposta negativa e non sono tipo che insiste quando mi si dice di no, quindi qualora lo pensi puoi staro tranquillo Template:Smile) ciao Smitersleon ([[User talk:Smitersleon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Pava, che succede? come mai dici che le mie intenzioni non sono proprio condivise dal pensiero di wikimedia? Dimmi cosa baglio così mi conformo alle indicazioni. Smitersleon ([[User talk:Smitersleon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ma io intendevo dire che siccome dopo le tante e tante mie richieste senza risposta su quella pagina, volevo sottolineare che non avevo grosse pretese, quella pagina prima di essere eliminata era più che completa ma doveva essere solo corretta, ma dato che è stata eliminata volevo ripristinarla quanto meno in parte, e ho pensato che se non avessi chiesto molti aiuti avrei avuto più consenso, certo a me interessava di più la presenza di quella voce ma questo non esclude enciclopedicità, autorevolezza e completezza dell'informazione (oltre che un punto di vista neutrale e condiviso dalla community) di quella voce su dewikiquote anzi! ti dirò di più a me piace occuparmene il più possibile e se solo trovassi qualcuno che possa aiutarmi nella lingua e nelle impostazioni non esiterei a occuparmene a tempo pieno, anche perché conosco benissimo tutti i particolari sull'argomento, non mi credi? mettimi alla prova! e ti farò vedere la pagina più completa di wikimedia (intendo su quell'argomento), ma se devo scegliare preferisco chiedere aiuto per una pagina con meno argomenti piuttosto che niente, questo intendevo dire. Chiedi tutte le informazioni che vuoi e io te le darò. Se mi lasciano sbattere è normale che poi io ti dico vabè a questo punto a me non interessa più né la qualità né la quantità. Ad esempio io ti ho chiesto se puoi trovarmi qualcuno e tu mi hai risposto che non è possibile, OK per me va bene, non c'è problema, il discorso per me è chiuso, ma lasciarmi sbattere, come hanno fatto altri, mentre si discute, secondo me non è modo di aggire, poi ognuno è libero di interpretare diversamente le mie parole, intanto io sono qua presente e disponibile, e ad accettare qualsiasi decisione condivisa da tutti. Ciao Smitersleon ([[User talk:Smitersleon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

richiesta di informazione[edit]

Ciao Pava, scusa nuovamente il disturbo ma vorrei chiederti una piccolissima cosa: ti ricordi quando mi hai parlato che tutti i progetti di wikimedia prevedono completezza dell'informazione? Tranquillo non ritorno su quel discorso, anzi non centra assolutamente nulla. La mia richiesta è se potresti mandarmi un link dove dice che tutti i progetti di wikimedia prevedono completezza dell'informazione, magari in maniera categorica, Ciao Smitersleon ([[User talk:Smitersleon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Fiat 20935448215 7d32c89f7b o.png

Yours sincerely, Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problematici[edit]

Pava, c'è una UP su di te su it.wiki, se non te ne fossi ancora accorto. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 15:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 15 - ITALY - empty glass with Red italian very good wine .jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Riley Huntley ([[User talk:Riley Huntley|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 15 - Red wine - Refosco DOC.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Riley Huntley ([[User talk:Riley Huntley|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

come va?[edit]

ciao--Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste

Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 13 - ITALY - italian cherry - ciliegie.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Syced ([[User talk:Syced|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 13 - made in Italy - diciture.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Syced ([[User talk:Syced|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:"13 - ITALY - Brera in the mirror.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Syced ([[User talk:Syced|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:"15 - ITALY - wine and cheese Refosco gorgonzola e noci .jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Syced ([[User talk:Syced|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BARNSTAR codice di computer File:"[edit]

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		File:" File:"

David Adam Kess ([[User talk:David Adam Kess|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) may 2016 (UTC)

File:" 14 - ITALY - Stair drawing - Scale disegno con note.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Sebastian Wallroth ([[User talk:Sebastian Wallroth|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hostess at Fiat Punto stand in India.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Taivo ([[User talk:Taivo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Pkbwcgs ([[User talk:Pkbwcgs|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 13 - ITALY - Superleggera Giò Ponti - Cassina - superlight iItalian furniture technology.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Prosfilaes ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:" 09 - ITALY - TDM - Red armchair - Serie UP (UP5 and UP6) Gaetano Pesce chairs and B&B Italia at Triennale Design Museum.jpg - Image Permission[edit]

Dear Pava,
I am a retired proffessor and currently redacting my compiled course notes into a book named "History of Interior Design and Furniture” which will be in turkish language and will be distributed in Turkey. It is a cultural and educational reference book.I would like to use the image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:"_09_-_ITALY_-_TDM_-_Red_armchair_-_Serie_UP_(UP5_and_UP6)_Gaetano_Pesce_chairs_and_B%26B_Italia_at_Triennale_Design_Museum.jpg I kindly ask for your permission and infomation about terms and conditions of using your image. Your name will be indicated at the end of the book in the photo credits part.

Yours Sincerely
Prof. Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com Template:Unsigned2