User talk:Patafisik/Archive 02
See also: User talk:Patafisik. 
New uploads by Isere-culture[edit]
Hi Krd, thanks for your job. For information : I think that user:Isere-culture is tryng to upload exclusively his own photos, this time, but I hope he will explain if it's really his own work or not, after massive deletion of uploads. I'm not 100% sure without his formal declaration. I suggest him ask for information, you or help service. Have a nice day,--Pạtạfisik 09:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- For the images already deleted we need COM:OTRS in any case, and reuploading is neither required nor helpful. Thank you for taking care of the issue! --Krd 09:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
File Guigues V[edit]
Hi Marcus Cyron, I'm sorry for this misunderstanding, I conserved information for the admin who had to rename the file, to improve the comprehension of the task. The file is in my watchlist, I would have changed description after rename. You do it for me, thanks. Have a nice day,--Pạtạfisik 10:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, It#s always better to correct the things first, then comes the renaming. Because the important thing is, that the discription provides the correct informations. The name is the less important thing compared to categories and mostly to a good discription. Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016[edit]
|
Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno. Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione. Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste |
Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- grazie di aver risposto dopo ben un mese, non è da tutti tale cortesia. Comunque il messaggio non è "ad personam" per evitare favoritismi, è stata una query specifica (dettagli nel link sulle liste) su utenti it-N attivi su commons a dar il tuo nome con quello di altre decine. --Alexmar983 (talk) 11:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- mi fa piacere il tuo supporto ma ti assicuro che "coraggio" ne ho q.b. In questo periodo mi sto dedicando a wikidata, wikisource, meta, wikipedia in inglese ma solo wikisource è arrivata per il tempo libero da itwikipedia, delle altre mi occupavo già. itwikipedia continuo a leggerla perché ci sono abituato come punto di partenza, mi puoi trovare su altre piattaforme con un messaggio di benvenuto a un niubbo, un link aggiunto su data, cos così. Non è detto che ci ritorni scaduto il blocco. Cioè ci posso anche ritornare di pssaggio, ma non ha fatto altro che accelerare i miei interessi che erano già un po' ovunque. Prima o poi bluificherò la tua talk su qualche altra piattaforma, se hai dei dubbi, contattami pure. Quello che so lo dico.--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Patafisik,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Lac Luitel[edit]
Bonjour, merci pour vos imports d'images de l'Isère.
À tout hasard, avez-vous l'occasion d'aller faire des photos au Lac Luitel ? Il n'y a qu'une seule photo de ce beau site : Category:Réserve naturelle nationale du lac Luitel.
Merci d'avance. Pmau (talk) 18:32, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Charbonnaux ou Charbonneaux[edit]
Bonjour Patafisik, j'ai un doute sur l'orthographe de ce prieuré. L'IGN dit Charbonnaux mais Google préfère Charbonneaux... Y a-t-il d'autres sources fiables ? Pmau (talk) 15:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Guide pittoresque du voyageur en France - tome III[edit]
Bonjour, je suis un peu ennuyé avec ces 133 imports provenant du « Guide pittoresque du voyageur en France ».
Il me semble tout d'abord que ça ne rentre pas vraiment dans le cadre de l'Été des Régions. Il s'agit de scans et non de photos de lieux ou de manifestations.
Ensuite, le format PDF n'est pas vraiment idéal pour mettre à disposition des scans. Il vaut mieux utiliser le format TIFF. Il faudrait également supprimer les marges inutiles mais le format PDF ne permet pas d'utiliser l'outil Croptool.
Enfin, certains documents ne sont pas parallèles aux bords et doivent être tournés de quelques degrés.
Bref, je n'ai pas trop envie de me lancer dans la conversion et je suis bien embarrassé. Qu'en pensez-vous ? Pmau (talk) 14:44, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- Bonsoir, je vous ai transmis par email tout à l'heure un lien sur un fichier ZIP contenant les 133 images détourées. Cordialement. Pmau (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 |
File:Eric Tasset 2005 Izeaux 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
|
File:Eric Tasset 2005 Izeaux 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Même si c'est temporaire pour une discussion sur Wikipédia, merci d'éviter d'uploader des copyvios. Vous pouvez uploader ce genre d'images vers un autre hébergeur comme Imgur. Cordialement. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
|
File:Isopentano struttura.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 21:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Grazie, ma purtroppo non è sufficiente[edit]
Ciao Patafisik. Grazie per avermi risposto. Ho seguito le tue istruzioni, ma la modifica ora sulla pagina https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Potd/2017-03-18_(it) non c'è sulla pagina principale di Commons. Come mai? Grazie di nuovo. --Antonella (talk) 13:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sì, avevo infatti svuotato la cache e anche provato a caricare la pagina su un altro browser, ma non andava lo stesso. Ora però ho visto ed è tutto a posto, grazie al tuo aiuto. Sono felice di averti conosciuto. Buon lavoro a te, su wiki e nella vita. --Antonella (talk) 14:28, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Piacere mio! Ho visto che la partecipazione muliebre ai progetti Commons è scarna, ma al di là del sesso, sono felice di aver conosciuto una persona in gamba, come mi sembri tu. Proverò a dare un'occhiata alle didascalie future, quando potrò; grazie per la fiducia accordata. Alla prossima. --Antonella (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Villard...[edit]
Ciao, le categorie fontane va bene. E' una frazione di Grenoble? Allora vanno sottocategorizzate in Grenoble. E' un comun a sé stante? Allora vanno categorizzate in Isère. Ho corretto il titolo della voce della chiesa e creato quella della fontana. Controlla le sottocategorie, quali giuste. Grazie --Sailko (talk) 06:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
RE:Ipotiroidismo[edit]
Grazie! era stato un mio errore... Ciao. --Adert (talk) 18:41, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Demande de retouche de cliché[edit]
Bonjour Patafisik,
peut-être vous souvenez-vous de l'épine du pied que vous m'aviez magistralement retiré en redressant cette image (obligée pour ne pas endommager l'ouvrage) : 
.
Vous aviez abouti à cela : 
.
Vous serait-il possible de faire la même retouche sur cette publicité (ici le journal ne permet pas une meilleure photo) : 
?
Bien sûr je reste à votre disposition pour tout renseignement si vous le souhaitez.
Bien Cordialement. 6PO 19:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Date[edit]
Hi Patafisik, do you have any idea where the date in this foto comes from? Which way were you uploading the photo? Was the date automatically added? Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 17:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Aschroet: Fixed.--Pạtạfisik 18:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, however i asked because many other photos have such a strange date. Do you have any idea where it comes from? --Arnd (talk) 18:25, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Aschroet: Certamente. Un giorno mi è caduta la macchina fotografica (la vecchia Nikon) e non so perché da allora ha perso la memorizzazione della data, ma scatta ancora le foto. Molte delle mie foto scattate con quell'apparecchio hanno gli exif con data sconosciuta per quel motivo. Le ho caricate con Commonist o con Upload Wizard, come tutti. Non so perché la foto in questione avesse la data 0002, credo si tratti di un semplice refuso di quando l'ho caricata. Quali altre foto ? Mi scuso per l'italiano al posto dell'inglese. Cordialmente,--Pạtạfisik 05:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, however i asked because many other photos have such a strange date. Do you have any idea where it comes from? --Arnd (talk) 18:25, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Castello di Pagliara[edit]
Ciao, sto creando un item Wikidata per Category:Castello di Pagliara dove ci sono delle tue foto, ma non riesco a trovare coordinate attendibili: potresti darmi una mano? Grazie, Pietro (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Grazie mille: le inserite, poi verificarle potrebbe essere la scusa per farci una camminata ... Pietro (talk) 20:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:GiuseppeMarotta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Danyele (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Files corrotti[edit]
Grazie della segnalazione. Quei files possono essere cancellati, avevo letto che era possibile caricare files in formato xcf per cui avevo utilizzato quel formato, ma vedendo che non c'era anteprima e le informazioni dell'immagine li avevo convertiti in jpg e ricaricati in quel formato. --Arcanma (talk) 12:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Saint-Martin d'Uriage acb39 Dunoyer de Segonzac.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrice Dunoyer de Segonzac (talk) 16:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Saint-Martin d'Uriage acb34 Dunoyer de Segonzac.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrice Dunoyer de Segonzac (talk) 16:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Pra Reboul - vers l'aérodrome de Saint Crépin.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Pra Reboul - vers l'aérodrome de Saint Crépin.jpg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pra Reboul - vers l'aérodrome de Saint Crépin.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 17:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:2015-06 StreetArtFest Grenoble - 4471.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:2015-06 StreetArtFest Grenoble - 4431.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove warnings[edit]
{{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details).
If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.File:Pra Reboul - vers l'aérodrome de Saint Crépin.jpg There is no text on the Flickr page to say he is donating the image -see COM:PDM and User:Ronhjones/PDMreplyRonhjones (Talk) 17:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth France 2019 a commencé ![edit]
Bonjour 
,
J'ai le plaisir de vous annoncer que la cinquième édition du concours Wiki Loves Earth en France est ouverte !
Le concours concernera 368 zones de toute la France, des parcs nationaux jusqu’aux réserves naturelles régionales englobant ainsi des paysages et biotopes variés.
Pendant le mois de mai, n'hésitez pas à mettre en ligne des photos de ces zones que vous auriez sur vos disques durs ou à vous rendre dans une zone concernée près de chez vous (à l'aide de la carte). Le règlement est disponible sur la page du concours.
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé de commonistes, d'acteurs de l'environnement et de photographes professionnels. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales. Vous pourrez retrouver toutes les informations détaillées sur le site du concours
P.S. : si vous ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
Bonne journée, Sarah Krichen WMFr (talk) 08:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso![edit]
Hi,
You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!
You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.
This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.
If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]
Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
Bonne journée,
Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]
Dear Patafisik,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]
Dear Patafisik,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Akai EWI 5000 abc5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
217.81.162.149 15:47, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Villa spada abc2 placca.jpg
- File:La Pierre 2019 abc6.jpg
- File:La Pierre 2019 abc4.jpg
- File:Saint-Nazaire-les-Eymes 2019 abc28 Manival.jpg
- File:Saint-Nazaire-les-Eymes 2019 abc26 pont du Manival.jpg
- File:Saint-Nazaire-les-Eymes 2019 abc13 maison forte et grange de Miribel.jpg
- File:Saint-Nazaire-les-Eymes 2019 abc8 place de l'église.jpg
- File:Château de Clèmes 2019 abc1.jpg
- File:Saint-Nazaire-les-Eymes 2019 abc1 mairie-école.jpg
- File:Maison curiale de l église Saint-Pierre de La Pierre 07.jpg
- File:Fontaine de la perrière abc2.jpg
- File:Town hall of La Pierre abc1.jpg
- File:Médiévale de St Antoine l'Abbaye 2019 abc13.jpg
- File:Manoir de Veaubeaunais, La Pierre 01.jpg
Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 15:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Info Fontana della Terra - Anguillara.JPG
- File:Pannello informativo vicolo Grondarella.JPG
- File:Pannello Porta maggiore Anguillara Sabazia.JPG
Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 15:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Convertire video[edit]
Cara Patafisik, vorrei caricare un video il cui formato non è supportato (.mp4). Per convertirlo in OGG non ho trovato nulla di decente in rete, a meno di perdere definizione. Per favore, che tu sappia c'è un convertitore su Commons, o istruzioni su come procedere? Grazie dell'attenzione. --Antonella (talk) 15:29, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Carissima, grazie! Ho già VLC ma non sono riuscita a capire come convertire il file dall'interno dell'applicazione. Comunque guarderò meglio e ti farò sapere. In bocca al lupo e un riconoscente e cordiale saluto! --Antonella (talk) 16:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fatto, grazie a te. Ho aggiornato VLC ed è andata (quasi) liscia come l'olio. Spero di poter ricambiare. Buon tutto! --Antonella (talk) 21:27, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Image corruption detected in File:Opera 2 San Remigio GMN 9.jpg[edit]
TheSandBot (talk) 14:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Opera 2 San Remigio GMN 9.jpg[edit]
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Opera 2 San Remigio GMN 9.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 19:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Image corruption detected in File:Mulino di Herin Antey-Saint-André 01.jpg[edit]
TheSandBot (talk) 18:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mémorial du Maquis de l'Oisans, Livet.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Mémorial du Maquis de l'Oisans, Livet.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mémorial du Maquis de l'Oisans, Livet.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Nominated for deletion by A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:11, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Mémorial du Maquis de l'Oisans, Livet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan2 (talk) 20:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Le torrent[edit]
Bonjour . Bravo pour l'énorme et excellent travail fait sur l'expo, que je n'ai pas encore visitée. Je ne la connais que par les très bonnes vidéos de Guy Tossato sur YouTube. Mais au moins puisque tu as déjà fait les pohtos, je n'aurais plus qu'à la visiter relax, sans avoir à me soucier de prendre des photos.... Concernant ta remaque sur Le Torrent, tu as très probablement raison. Ce qui permettrait de trancher c'est de connaître le numéro de reference (MG.....) de la statue présente à l'expo, et de comparer avec le numéro de reference de la statue qui est présentée dans les collections permanentes (MG1024). Si effectivement c'est different, alors oui il faut annuler mes modifs. As tu cle catalogue de l'expo pour verifier? Si non, je regarderais qu'and j'irai voir l'expo. Merci pour tout. --Zen 38 (talk) 08:51, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Par ailleurs je suis un peu perplexe sur le fait que certaines oeuvres ( Gratianopolis ou le Christ Ecce Homo de Ding) ne sont pas répertoriées dans la base Joconde. Est ce que ça veut dire que ce ne sont pas des oeuvres qui sont dans les collections du musée de Gre ? Peu probable, car en particulier GuyTossato disait que le Ecce Homo vait été exhume des collections du musée. Alors la base Joconde est incomplète? --Zen 38 (talk) 09:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- La version grand format du Torrent c'est MG 701 dixit le catalogue de l'expo
Bonjour Patafisik
Je ne suis pas vraiment convaincu par le déplacement de la catégorie Category:Buildings in Voiron sous la catégorie Category:Architecture of Voiron.
De manière communément admise dans Commons, les catégories "Buildings in xxx" (pour une commune) peuvent se traduire par "constructions ou édifices dans xxx" et cela quelle que soit la nature de la construction ou de l'édifice (bâtiments, ponts, fontaines, cimetièes,... ou toutes structures ou infrastructures notoires ou notables). Or, toutes les constructions ou édifices ne sont pas forcément des œuvres "architecturales". J'aurais tendance à dire que l'architecture est une catégorie transversale aux autres catégories d'une commune, tout comme les édifices inscrits aux MH ou les mobiliers de la base Mérimée.
C'est juste mon humble avis. A vous de me dire. Bien cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 19:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Bonjour Poudou99, je fais des sous-catégories depuis longtemps pour des villes italiennes et parfois françaises, j'ai suivi les modèles que j'ai à disposition, voir par exemple Category:Architecture in Florence, Category:Architecture of Grenoble, Category:Architecture of Lyon, Category:Architecture of New York City, etc. Buildings est toujours une sous-catégorie de Architecture, pour Lyon et New York il y a aussi la sous-catégorie intermédiaire Structures. Cordialement,--Pạtạfisik 19:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- J'ai énormément versé de photos de "buildings" dans les catégories relatives aux communes françaises et c'est la première fois que je vois ce classement : "Buildings est toujours une sous-catégorie de Architecture". C'est peut-être vrai pour les grandes villes où il y a une énorme diversité architecturale et où les types d'éléments architecturaux sont très nombreux, mais je ne suis pas convaincu pour les petites communes où la catégorie "Architecture of xxx" risque de se limiter à une catégorie : "Buildings in xxx", voire avec éventuellement une catégorie transverse pour les MHs.
- Je ne vais pas vous lister les centaines de catégories de communes où "Buildings in xxx" est directement rattachée à la catégorie principale relative à la commune (cela serait fastidieux, croyez-moi), mais je pense qu'il faudrait limiter votre choix aux seules communes où cela en vaut vraiment la peine et où les sous-catégories de ":Architecture of xxx" sont suffisamment nombreuses, pertinentes et discriminantes.
- Introduire un niveau supplémentaire dans la hiérachie des catégories d'une commune n'est pas toujours pertinent, les catégories deviennent significatives et utiles dès lors qu'il y a au moins cinq éléments bien différenciés. Cela n'est pas le cas partout et cela intriduirait un travail bien inutile à mon avis.
- Bien cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 20:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sûrement il y a déjà eu un débat par rapport à cette question, peut-être il faudrait demander à un projet spécifique ou au bistrot ? J'ai pris pas mal de photos de Voiron et je vais bientôt les télécharger, je me suis mise en avant sur le travail de catégorisation, si cela vous pose problème c'est mieux demander un troisième avis. Cordialement, Pạtạfisik 20:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Je serais intéressé pour avoir le lien vers ce débat.
- Dans Commons, en dehors des aspects techniques et des recommandations générales, il n'y a pas franchement de règles sur les catégorisations ; juste des usages et des consensus... et du bon sens bien sûr.
- Ce que je dis, c'est qu'une catégorie qui contient moins de 4 ou 5 éléments (sans compter les catégories transveres) ce n'est pas franchement utile. Cela crée de la profondeur hiérarchique en plus. Si vous mettez en place une catégorie Category:Architecture of Voiron avec plusieurs éléments bien discriminés (outre Category:Buildings in Voiron ) cela ne me posera aucun problème évidemment.
- Quand je regarde le contenu de Category:Architecture of Grenoble je constate que les catégories : Category:Monuments historiques in Grenoble, Category:Art Nouveau architecture in Grenoble et Category:Architectural elements in Grenoble (en partie) ne sont que des sous-ensembles de Category:Buildings in Grenoble. Cela ne motive vraiment pas la création d'une catégorie Category:Architecture of Grenoble au-dessus de Category:Buildings in Grenoble.
- À la rigueur, les catégories : Category:Monuments historiques in Grenoble, Category:Art Nouveau architecture in Grenoble et Category:Architectural elements in Grenoble devraient être des catégories transverses à la catégorie principales Category:Grenoble ou Category:Buildings in Grenoble (avec une clé de type "*", ou "+", ou " ").
- Mais bon, si vos apports sont suffisamment significatifs pour changer la hiérarchie des catégories au sein d'une catégorie principale existante, je n'y vois pas d'inconvénients. Ce qui compte c'est l'effort de contribution de chacun (enrichissement de Commons) et d'amélioration de la structure des catégories pour des recherches plus faciles. Je vous laisse à votre ouvrage.
- Il est préférable de toujours répondre dans la page de discussion là ou celle-ci a débuté. Cela permet une lecture séquentielle des échanges et évitant de naviguer d'une PdD à une autre). Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sûrement il y a déjà eu un débat par rapport à cette question, peut-être il faudrait demander à un projet spécifique ou au bistrot ? J'ai pris pas mal de photos de Voiron et je vais bientôt les télécharger, je me suis mise en avant sur le travail de catégorisation, si cela vous pose problème c'est mieux demander un troisième avis. Cordialement, Pạtạfisik 20:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Tableaux de Bertier[edit]
Bonjour
Il y a une erreur sur un tableau de Bertier que tu as uploadé
.
Cette image que tuas uploadé est bien un tableau de Bertier présent à l'expo sur Grenoble et ses artistes. Mais en fait son titre est de "Les Fréaux près de La Grave, Hautes Alpes". La vraie image.
L"image qui correspond à "la vallée du Vénéon à SDaibnt-Christopge en Oisans" est celle-ci
Je ne sais pas comment corriger l'erreur. En particulier comment modifier le nom d'un fichier sous Commons ?
Bon courage --Zen 38 (talk) 07:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Église Saint-Georges - Saint-Georges-de-Commiers 2020 abc3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
VIGNERON (talk) 08:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]
Dear Patafisik,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)