User talk:PantheraLeo1359531/Archive 2020

Deutsch: Archiv 2020. Hier werden abgeschlossene Diskussionen vom Jahre 2020 angezeigt.
English: Archive 2020. Here you can find older discussions of 2020.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerüst Postfiliale Hof 20191212 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quite soft, but IMHO good enough quality. --Domob 18:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bismarckturm am Sonnenaufgang Hof 20191230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 19:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Front FFW Hof 20191212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abschnitt alter Bahnhof Hof 20191212 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment In general good quality, but I don't like the asymmetric crop. Can you try to crop more on the left? --Domob 18:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)  Done Of course, here you go :) --PantheraLeo1359531 11:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)  Support Thanks! --Domob 13:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogenfenster Jakobuskirche Oberkotzau 20200105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen Hof 20200102 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted to the right --Poco a poco 15:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, tilted --PantheraLeo1359531 20:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fußgängerpassage Innenstadt Hof 20200104 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltestelle "Rathaus" Hof 20200104 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Visit of the Sierpiński octahedron 20191124 5K.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:NASA's Fermi Links Cosmic Neutrino to Monster Black Hole.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Notes on my photo

Hi there. During QI voting process 22 Dec you added notes saying that my Sambar photo had dust spots and I explained that they were flies. I've just noticed you didn't delete your notes - I've done it now. Charles (talk) 21:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

No problem, it is your photo :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tür Jakobuskirche Oberkotzau 20200113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kein Meme ist illegal-Meme.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kein Meme ist illegal-Meme.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kein Meme ist illegal-Meme.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Folge 13 - Heimweh und Erleichterung (Meine Wende - Unsere Einheit).webm

Copyright status: File:Folge 13 - Heimweh und Erleichterung (Meine Wende - Unsere Einheit).webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Folge 13 - Heimweh und Erleichterung (Meine Wende - Unsere Einheit).webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

 Info License info fixed, deletion info removed. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 07:35, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunte Nudeln 20200117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 18:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telekom-Telefon in der Altstadt Hof 20200104 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 18:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, done --PantheraLeo1359531 09:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC) Better, but not yet there... --Poco a poco 14:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)  New version Better now? --PantheraLeo1359531 09:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)  Support Indeed --Poco a poco 20:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

FV Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:Moon Phase and Libration, 2020 South Up 4K UHD.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Moon Phase and Libration North, 2020 4K UHD.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 04:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreieinigkeitskirche Hof bei Sonnenaufgang 20200115 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --MB-one 12:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

FV Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:Exoplanet Size Comparison (Ft. The Exoplanets Channel) - YouTube.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Exoplanet Size Comparison (Ft. The Exoplanets Channel) - YouTube.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 06:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flair im Seebachtal 20190820 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tor Fußweg Seebachtal am Stappitzer See 20190820 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hütten am Stappitzer See 20190820 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. I'm guessing the reason the cabin on the right is so much less sharp than the one on the left is because of mist that we don't see? Also, you might want to work on the caption. :-) Ikan Kekek 13:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)  Caption added Thanks for the review, I added a bigger description :). The lack of sharpness is a pity, to be honest, but I hope that this tolerable. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)  Comment The caption per se just says "Fotografie." I'm interested to know the reason why one shack is sharp and the other is not. If it's due to unseen mist, I think it's tolerable, but if it's a lens issue or something, maybe it should be sharpened. -- Ikan Kekek 16:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)  DoneNow I understand, what "caption" means :). New caption and sharpened image added. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:33, 28 January 2020 (UTC)  Support - The right side is still mysteriously less sharp than the rest, but it's better. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 11:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stappitzer See in HDR 20190820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Essentially the same question and remark as for the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek 13:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)  Caption added Thanks for the review, I added a bigger description :). --PantheraLeo1359531 14:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreieinigkeitskirche Hof 20191030 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A good file that taken with Samsung Galaxy S10. --Lexy iris 21:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterliche Bäume im Bismarckturmpark Hof 20200129 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spielplatz im Bismarckturmpark Hof 20200129 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, and I remember as a kid how sad a scene like this was for me. -- Ikan Kekek 13:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Schauspielerin Julia Jentsch auf der Blauen Couch.webm

File:Schauspielerin Julia Jentsch auf der Blauen Couch.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eatcha (talk) 14:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:ΙΧΘΥΣ DreiE Hof 20200203.png

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ΙΧΘΥΣ DreiE Hof 20200203.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Stoffwerk am Altar DreiE Hof 20200203 002 RAW.png

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoffwerk am Altar DreiE Hof 20200203 002 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 17:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Ornamentiertes Altarkruzifix DreiE Hof 20200203 002 RAW.png

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ornamentiertes Altarkruzifix DreiE Hof 20200203 002 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Podzemnik 17:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC) Thank you :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Altar DreiE Hof 20200203 001.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar DreiE Hof 20200203 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 17:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Altergemälde Flammen DreiE Hof 20200203 002 RAW.png

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altergemälde Flammen DreiE Hof 20200203 002 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzel ICH DreiE Hof 20200203 005 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitzbankreihen DreiE Hof 20200203 011 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Altergemälde ΙΧΘΥΣ DreiE Hof 20200203 002 RAW.png

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altergemälde ΙΧΘΥΣ DreiE Hof 20200203 002 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The cross (?) at the bottom left is spoling the image, can you clone it or crop it out? --Poco a poco 18:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC) I'll give it a try :) --PantheraLeo1359531 18:51, 4 February 2020 (UTC)  New version Cross-free version added --PantheraLeo1359531 19:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liedertafel DreiE Hof 20200203 003 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mengerbulb 003 20200206 8K HQ Fulldome.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infoschild Hospitalkirche Hof 20200208 RAW 02.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mengerbulb 002 20200206 8K HQ.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 13:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Erweiterter Bereich DreiE Hof 20200203 008.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erweiterter Bereich DreiE Hof 20200203 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support There's some CA on the far left, but the main part of the image is good enough quality for me --Domob 15:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grasende Kuh am Wegesrand im Seebachtal 20190820 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Would have preferred a shallower DoF. But good enough. --MB-one 12:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gebäude Ludwigstraße 1 Hof 20200208 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Altargemälde Auge Gottes DreiE Hof 20200203 001 RAW.png

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altargemälde Auge Gottes DreiE Hof 20200203 001 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DiFS square grid 20200202 8K klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grasende Kühe am Wegesrand im Seebachtal 20190820 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relaxende Kühe am Wegesrand Seebachtal 20190820 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mengerbulb 20200206 8K HQ.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Infotext DreiE Hof 20200203 003 RAW.png

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotext DreiE Hof 20200203 003 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

St. Michaelis (Hof)

Hallo PantheraLeo, ich kann mir vorstellen, dass Dein Foto Türbildnis der Michaeliskirche Hof 20200214 RAW 02.png nicht irgendeinen Mann darstellt, sondern die Bibelstelle, in der es heißt: „Nachdem er dann ein wenig weitergegangen war, warf er sich auf sein Angesicht nieder und betete mit den Worten: »Mein Vater, wenn es möglich ist, so laß diesen Kelch an mir vorübergehen! Doch nicht wie ich will, sondern wie du willst!«“ (Mt 26,39) Im Bild wirft er sich zwar nicht „auf sein Angesicht“, aber das könnte unmittelbar danach geschehen sein, nachdem ihm der Kelch, das heißt der Leidenskelch dargeboten wurde. Vielleicht wäre es interessant, bei der Kirchengemeinde nachzufragen. Viele Grüße und schönen Sonntag -- Spurzem (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
In Lk 22/43 heißt es dann weiter: „Da erschien ihm ein Engel vom Himmel und gab ihm Kraft.“ -- Spurzem (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Danke für die Infos, da kennst Du Dich viel besser aus als ich :). Ich muss zugeben, dass ich mit den Bibelgeschichten überhaupt nichts am Hut habe, was sich in der Beschreibung niederschlägt, aber ich kann das gerne mal recherchieren. Grüße und guten Start in die Woche --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Türknauf Michaeliskirche Hof 20200214 02.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 20:41, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fenster über Unterführung Michaeliskirche Hof 20200214.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holztür am Aufstieg Michaeliskirche Hof 20200214.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:57, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter mood-MEME 20200213.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Tor Hidden Service of Duck uck Go 24072019.png

File:Tor Hidden Service of Duck uck Go 24072019.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This screenshot contains the DuckDuckGo logo, whose copies were deleted per ticket:201812311000463 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

George Ho (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

@George Ho: Didn't know that this was copyrighted. Sorry :( --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

It's all right. BTW, I don't feel like giving you the template next time. George Ho (talk) 08:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

@George Ho: No problem, that file is a copyvio, so you did everything right. Back these days when I upload this file, I didn't get used to copyright in detail :). --09:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Michaeliskirche Hof 20200214 cropped RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portaloberseite der Michaeliskirche Hof 20200214 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal der Michaeliskirche Hof 20200214 Detail 02 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relaxende Kühe am Wegesrand Seebachtal 20190820 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me --Dira0101 15:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Klaus Adelt beim SPD-Jahresempfang 20200219.png

---

Hello PantheraLeo1359531, it appears that the version of File:Klaus Adelt beim SPD-Jahresempfang 20200219.png which you uploaded 2020-02-19T20:33:10Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 20:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figuren auf Brunnen vor Rathaus Hof 20200214 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:50, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schriftzug "Hofer Anzeiger" 20200214 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holzlager bei Mühldorf 20190821 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandunterbrechungen Hospitalkirche Hof 20200207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality in spite of the very tight crop at the left and right -- Spurzem 11:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beschnittener Baumstamm im Seebachtal 20190820 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 10:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saalradweg an Hospitalkirche Hof, Hof (Saale) 20200208 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments WB looks off to me --Poco a poco 16:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)  Done Little amplification, is it better? --PantheraLeo1359531 09:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Looks more realistic although you retouched the curves, not the WB --Poco a poco 20:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofer Geschichtswege 1 20200214 RAW.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitzbänke DreiE 20200203 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterführung an der Barabarossaschlucht 20190821 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterführung an der Barabarossaschlucht 20190821 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbarossaschlucht 20190821 Infoschild 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fluss in der Barbarossaschlucht Detail 20190821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 18:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fluss in der Barbarossaschlucht 20190821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 18:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weg über Wasserregulationsmaßnahme 20190821 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierpinski-Pyramide Spitze 8K OpenCL HQ 20200221 002.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liegende graue Katze 20200219 135657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleiner Wasserfall in der Barbarossaschlucht 20190821 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laufweg in der Barbarossaschlucht 20190821 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Oswald-Schild (Mallnitz) 20190821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbarossaschlucht-Logo 20190821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Verwaistes Bahnhofgebäude Hof 20200223 001.jpg

Hallo, warum hast Du die Datei Verwaistes Bahnhofgebäude Hof 20200223 001.jpg mit verschiedenen Bildern überschrieben? Das ist so nicht in Ordnung, vergleiche COM:OVERWRITE. Am besten beantragst Du selbst in COM:HMS den Split (siehe dort Abschnitt 4). Wenn ich das richtig sehe, müssten das 4 verschiedene Bilder sein. Du kannst selbst Namen vorschlagen. Ich kann den Antrag auch für dich übernehmen, aber dann wäre die Namensgebung nicht in deiner Hand (ich würde nur den Zahlenindex erhöhen, aber evtl. würdest Du eine andere Zählung bevorzugen). Zu Deiner anscheinenden Verwunderung in der Bildbeschreibung: Es handelt sich offensichtlich um ein ehemaliges Bahnhofsgebäude, wo einst Gleise hineinführten (ein Postbahnhof vielleicht?). Für die Züge musste eine Öffnung vorhanden sein, also dürfte die eine seite immmer offen gewesen sein. — Speravir – 23:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Okay, danke, ich werde mich darum kümmern. Mir war die Regelung nicht bekannt.
Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 07:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserfall von der Linde-Kanzel 20190821 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleiner Wasserfall in der Barbarossaschlucht 20190821 C.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathausgebäude Hof 20200214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:59, 16 February 2020 (UTC) IMHO is here the perspective overcorrected, both sideas are leaning out and the tower looks deformed --Poco a poco 12:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, overcorrection removed --PantheraLeo1359531 11:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC) Better, but now there's some ccw tilt --Poco a poco 20:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)  Done Thx, slight rotated --PantheraLeo1359531 21:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Just ok --Poco a poco 21:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegel von Gmünd 20190821 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tor des Schlosses Lodron in Gmünd 20190822 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality although a tighter crop would probably be even better --MB-one 10:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbarossaschlucht 20190821 Parkplatz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 12:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

FV Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:NEFFEX - Make It (Official Video) Fight Back The Collection OUT NOW! - YouTube.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:NEFFEX - Make It (Official Video) Fight Back The Collection OUT NOW! - YouTube.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue "Mater Salvatoris" (Kirche St. Martin) Bamberg 20200227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Categories need some completing. --Ermell 19:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Cats added --PantheraLeo1359531 19:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zugang zur Alten Burg Gmünd 20190822 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zugang zur Alten Burg Gmünd 20190822 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Exoplanet Size Comparison (Ft. The Exoplanets Channel) - YouTube.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pflastersteine in Gmünd 20190822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von der Alten Burg Gmünd 20190822 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Lodron-Schild 20190822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Categorization need to be improved --MB-one 11:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Cats improved --PantheraLeo1359531 18:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)  Support QI for me. --Yerpo 14:08, 2 March 2020 (UTC)  Support QI now --MB-one 13:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Außenfassade Pfarrkirche Gmünd 20190822 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Außenfassade Pfarrkirche Gmünd 20190822 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --T.Bednarz 15:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Außenfassade Pfarrkirche Gmünd 20190822 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halteverbot an Pfarrkirche Gmünd 20190822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mengerzug (Normalenform) 20200203 8K CPU.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolpersteine in Bamberg 20200227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IM3847 11:33, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkettierung am JCRG Hof 20200307 134847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:18, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bayerische Staatsbank in Bamberg 20200227 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:40, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Messerschmitt in Bamberg 20200227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DIFS Multi V1 10K 20200309 OpenCL 02.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image. -- Ikan Kekek 08:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koch V3 85 Grad 20200311 8K HQ OpenCL.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good. --Till.niermann 20:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psalmstein Bismarckturmpark Hof 20200305 162249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm thinking about usability of 108 MPX picture if to get sharp results, you have to downscale by about 90 % --Podzemnik 06:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)  Smaller image added --PantheraLeo1359531 08:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)  Support The stone doesn't have much details but still QI to me --Podzemnik 21:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tür Pfarrkirche Gmünd 20190822 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolpersteine in Bamberg 20200227 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Doesn't it need a 90 degrees tilt? --Poco a poco 14:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, rotation command added --PantheraLeo1359531 15:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Goethe (Stieler 1828)-Meme.jpg

File:Goethe (Stieler 1828)-Meme.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BlinxTheKitty (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Verspäteter Ping

Hattest Du das eigentlich mitbekommen? Schon archiviert: Commons:History merging and splitting/Requests/Archive 4#File:Verwaistes Bahnhofgebäude Hof 20200223 001.jpg → File:Verwaistes Bahnhofgebäude Hof 20200223 002.jpg. — Speravir – 20:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Ah super, vielen Dank, habe ich tatsächlich nicht mitbekommen :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Theresienstein 20200314 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Theresienstein 20200314 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Extra-radio Hof 20200314 152340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inskription Kirche St. Martin Bamberg 20200227 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 18:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokusse Theresienstein 20200314 142156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Crocuses are minority here:) White ones seem C. thracicus or C. mysius, if they are collection in a botanical garden. --Zcebeci 15:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)  Comment I think the most plants are so-called daffodils. -- Spurzem 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turm Haus Theresienstein 20200314 135704 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turm des Hauses Theresienstein 20200314 135655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitze des Hauses Theresienstein 20200314 135554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KochV2 20200317 OpenCL 10K HQ klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichtsignalanlagen an der Poststraße Hof 20200315 144320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ampelmännchen Mainzelmännchen Mainz grün 20200301 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Türen am Schiller-Gymnasium Hof 20200315 141747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 18:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infoschild Theresienstein, Botanischer Garten 20200314 134528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Simple, but good enough. --Tournasol7 09:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichtsignalanlage in Hof 20200315 144459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Simple, but good. --Tournasol7 09:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ZDF-Hochhaus 20200229 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bis bald - Central Kino Hof 20200319 161727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Informationszeichen zu § 28 IfSG Hof 20200323 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein 20200323 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein während Ausgangsbeschränkungen 20200323 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein während Ausgangsbeschränkungen 20200323 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein während COVID-19-Pandemie 20200323 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --17jiangz1 19:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein während COVID-19-Pandemie 20200323 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein während Ausgangsbeschränkungen 20200323 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and stay at home. --Tournasol7 14:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the advice, I wasn't longer outside as needed ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 11:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterne Steinerne Brücke Hof 20200323 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leere Straßen in Hof 20200323 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grüne Ampel in Hof 20200323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Adámoz 12:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein während COVID-19-Pandemie 20200323 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But is it empty really due to COVID pandemics? It seems to be quiet suburban street, what is empty 23 hours a day and 364 hours a year. (just from photo). --Grtek 11:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Informationszeichen zu § 28 IfSG Hof 20200323 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verbotszeichen Vögel füttern Untreusee 20200324 110130 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but it's it needs slight rotation to the left and I also think it"s a bit dark --Podzemnik 05:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, tweaks added --PantheraLeo1359531 10:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)  Support ok --Podzemnik 00:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verwaiste Tore in Hof 20200323 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Trostloser Anblick, aber gutes Foto – good quality -- Spurzem 18:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein während Ausgangsbeschränkungen 20200323 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein während Ausgangsbeschränkungen 20200323 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gesperrte Stühle in Hof 20200323 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is no category about what we see here --Poco a poco 21:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Cats added --PantheraLeo1359531 17:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infozeichen §28 IfSG Hof 20200323 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein 20200323 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much uninteresting foreground --Poco a poco 17:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)  Done much uninteresting foreground removed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 11:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality but unnecessarily inflated file size --Poco a poco 18:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein 20200323 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please improve the left crop (getting rid of the bench) and apply a vertical perspective correction (trees on both sides leaning in)? --Poco a poco 17:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the rev, tweaks added --PantheraLeo1359531 12:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality but unnecessarily inflated file size --Poco a poco 18:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein 20200323 131556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Titled (see tower in the back) and I'd crop some foreground --Poco a poco 17:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, tweaks added --PantheraLeo1359531 11:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality but unnecessarily inflated file size --Poco a poco 18:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Das Mandelbulb-Tal 8K HQ OpenCL 20200403.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, something very special --Michielverbeek 18:02, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:Corona_in_Bayern

Category:Corona_in_Bayern has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Riquix (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infozeichen §28 IfSG Hof 20200323 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schild §28 IfSG Hof 20200323 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:56, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leere am Untreusee 20200324 104934 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schuttberg Hof 20200406 130050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the most interesting composition and a bit oversharpened, but quality for me high enough for QI --Michielverbeek 08:33, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szenerie am Untreusee 20200324 08b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szenerie am Untreusee 20200324 06b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szenerie am Untreusee 20200324 05b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leere Wege am Untreusee 20200324 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leere Wege am Untreusee 20200324 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and good composition -- Spurzem 14:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leerer Steg am Untreusee 20200324 111414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but it needs a small perspective correction --Michielverbeek 07:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, I hope it is better now --PantheraLeo1359531 15:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)  Support For me it is good now. -- Spurzem 21:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leere am Untreusee 20200324 104934 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schild §28 IfSG Hof 20200323 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schild §28 IfSG Hof 20200323 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szenerie am Untreusee 20200324 11c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infoschild Stadtverwaltung Hof 20200405 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leere am Untreusee 20200324 104934 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antenne auf Hochhaus Hof 20200405 124719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 21:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menger-Schwamm 8K HQ OpenCL 20200413.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bagger in Hof 20200324 18d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality after adding a necesary cat for you --Poco a poco 16:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC) Thank you --PantheraLeo1359531 14:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szenerie am Untreusee 20200324 03b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schilder am Untreusee 20200324 02d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szenerie am Untreusee während COVID-19 20200324 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szenerie am Untreusee während COVID-19 20200324 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katzenstatue im Theresienstein 20200406 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Künstler-Gedenkstein in Park Theresienstein 20200406 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - I don't love the background, but there's no doubt in my mind that this is a very good picture of the memorial and a solid QI. -- Ikan Kekek 02:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katze mit Katzenaugen Theresienstein 20200406 112143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ich habe den Eindruck, das Bild sei ein bisschen überschärft. -- Spurzem 14:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Danke für den Hinweis, weichgezeichnet --PantheraLeo1359531 14:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC) Jetzt ist es ein schönes Bild; gefällt mir. -- Spurzem 16:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spielplatz am Untreusee 20200324 102522 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp, but can you pull the shadows a bit. The contrast is too high atm. --MB-one 11:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the rev, tweaks added --PantheraLeo1359531 14:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Much better --MB-one 15:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katzenaugengedenktafelstein Theresienstein Hof 20200406 112243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting the Sustainability Initiative!

Danke, dass du die Nachhaltigkeitsinitiative unterstützst!

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531, danke, dass du dich bei der Nachhaltigkeitsinitiative als Unterstützer eingetragen hast. So können wir zeigen, dass die Community dieses Projekt unterstützt. Wenn du noch andere Wiki-Freunde auf die Aktion aufmerksam machen ~könntest, wäre das super! Viele Grüße, --Gnom (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofer Geschichtswege 79 20200406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Labyrinthturm Theresienstein 20200406 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would remove (not crop) the branches at the right --Michielverbeek 17:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umgefallener Baum Pfaffenteich Hof 20200405 122236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small white area at the right front, perspective correction required (look at the very left and very right edge of the photo (see image notes). --Tuxyso 19:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, tweaks added --PantheraLeo1359531 14:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC) Better and imho QI now. --Tuxyso 17:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochspannungshäusl Hof 20200405 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please, get rid of the shadow on the left? --Poco a poco 16:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)  Shadow removed Thanks for the review --PantheraLeo1359531 14:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Labyrinthgebäude am Untreusee 20200324 04d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strohfeld in Hof 20200405 125022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwei Gänse am Pfaffenteich 20200405 121303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Labyrinthkomplex am Theresienstein 20200406 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit disturbing shadows but very good technical quality -- Spurzem 14:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Ludwig von Bayern 20200406 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick auf Hof 20200406 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weisheitstempel Theresienstein 20200406 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weg am Pfaffenteich 20200405 121508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szenerie am Untreusee 20200324 01d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szenerie in Krötenbruck 20200324 12d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 17:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomashöhe mit Pavillon 20200406 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feld am Pfaffenteich Hof 20200405 121615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandtext am Roten Ross 20200406 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schuttberg in Hof 20200406 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The 'Kasse aller Kassen' is leaning out a bit, but overall good quality. --PtrQs 00:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen Karolinenstraße in Hof 20200406 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlauchaufroller im Botanischen Garten Hof 20200406 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but can you please remove the shadow in the bottom right corner? --Poco a poco 18:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC) And the wheel of the hose reel should be not so bright. It is probably correctable. -- Spurzem 18:47, 20 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the reviews, tweaks added --PantheraLeo1359531 16:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Looks better --Poco a poco 16:06, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psalm 66,5-Stein 20200406 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please correct the perspective? --Poco a poco 18:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, perspective corrected --PantheraLeo1359531 16:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC)  Support I'd have gone further, but looks good enough --Poco a poco 16:06, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrsschild "Fußweg zum Labyrinth" 20200406 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schienen in Hof 20200406 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DHL-Packstation am Hofer Hauptbahnhof 20200406 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would crop the Parkschein sign --Michielverbeek 17:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal Haus 63 20200406 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and exact instruction signs -- Spurzem 16:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infoschild am Pfaffenteich 20200405 123837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Copyvio? --Kallerna 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)  Info No, take a look at Template:FoP-Germany. I was asked several times about copyvios at information boards, so I asked twice at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. They said there, that is has no problems. Also, I saw this board 2 years ago, so this board is quite sure permanently there (what is typical for them) --PantheraLeo1359531 08:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC) Copyright isn't an issue due to FoP. But the WB seems a bit off. I assume the base color of the board is white, not blue. --MB-one 12:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)  DoneThanks for the review, I hope it is better now --PantheraLeo1359531 18:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:09, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weg in Park Theresienstein 20200406 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Landschaft in Österreich

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531/Archive 2020, einige deiner Bilder sind etwas unpräzise kategorisiert. Es würde mich freuen, wenn du nacharbeiten könntest. Aufgefallen ist's mir bei [1]. Sonst gibt es noch die Möglichkeit, die Bilder nach Category:Unidentified locations in Austria zu verschieben. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, ich werde mich demnächst drum kümmern, Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 07:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scherdel-Logo 20200407 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofer Geschichtswege 62 20200407 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrsschild "Zum Panoramaweg" 20200406 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 17:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

QIC

Hello PantheraLeo1359531, please take a look at the images at Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#April_14,_2020 and let me know if you think the changes I applied are sufficient enough. --D-Kuru (talk) 18:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for me letting me know, I was a bit engaged the last time and didn't see the changes :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinweis Abstrichstelle Hof 20200407 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infoschild Hotel Central Hof 20200407 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanalschachtdeckel in Hof 20200407 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weg in Park Theresienstein 20200406 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Häuslein im Luitpoldhain am Thomasweiher 20200406 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straßenschild Absolviagasse 20200406 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luftbrücke Hof 20200406 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not an excellent photo, but the quality is good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 07:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KIFS OpenCL 8K HQ 20200503 13m 8,3s.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very nice --Michielverbeek 18:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen an Freiheitshalle 20200407 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen an Luftsteg Hof 20200407 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:59, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gesperrter Spielplatz am Untreusee 20200408 B 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 20:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkplatz an der Freiheitshalle Hof 20200407 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schiller-Gymnasium Hof, south facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for the hint, view orientation info added --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment He meant to add it to the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
• Thanks, scope changed --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 11:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandelbulb Vertiefung HQ 8K OpenCL 20200510.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infoschild zu Hans Rosenthal 20200407 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The upper third is somewhat distracting. Would crop a bit tighter. --MB-one 13:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, cropped --PantheraLeo1359531 11:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

FV Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:FractalSpirograph2880p60 20200409.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:FractalSpirograph2880p60 20200409.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:KIFS OpenCL 8K HQ 20200503 13m 8,3s.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:KIFS OpenCL 8K HQ 20200503 13m 8,3s.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menger 4D OpenCL HQ 8K 20200518.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menger 4D + Fractal Params 8K OpenCL HQ 20200516.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow....FP? --Sonya7iv 00:03, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Do you think this image has a chance? :D --PantheraLeo1359531 18:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC) My  Support is sure!--Sonya7iv 23:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newton Root-finding 25K 20200512.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triangle Vault 360 DEG HQ 10K OpenCL 20200522.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morning in the world of portals OpenCL 8K HQ 20200603.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 23:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Logo Metzgerei Leupold am Münster 20200414 102050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 20:39, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postkasten am Krötenhof 20200325 095216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO ----PJDespa 15:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vliestapete 20200608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Although the rubber-like touch of such wallpapers give me the creeps, this is a quality image! --PtrQs 22:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehem. Frauenklinik Bahnhofstraße Hof 20200414 085701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 13:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:FractalSpirograph2880p60 20200409.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KIFS HQ OpenCL 8K 20200608.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mengerschwamm leuchtend OpenCL HQ 10K 20200604.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:40, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tapetentextur 20190822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lampe mit gewobener Haube 20190822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halteverbotszeichen August-Mohl-Straße 20200414 102412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 18:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BLM-Demo Hof 20200620 DSC2262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graffito Why so serious Hof 20200428 124144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 21:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BLM-Demo Hof 20200620 DSC2194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Facebook Titelbild "Wichtige Jobs 1".png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Facebook Titelbild "Wichtige Jobs 1".png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

A1Cafel (talk) 16:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BLM-Demo Hof 20200620 DSC2260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 13:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BLM-Demo Hof 20200620 DSC2254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 13:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BLM-Demo Hof 20200620 DSC2242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 13:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingang Longoliusplatz 1 DSC2470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 21:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BLM-Demo Hof 20200620 DSC2232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 01:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BLM-Demo Hof 20200620 DSC2196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 01:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Benjamin Scholz (jungsfragen).png

File:Benjamin Scholz (jungsfragen).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quakewoody (talk) 11:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienkirche Hof 20200626 DSC2571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 09:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Rathaus Hof 20200626 DSC2508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 08:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofer Geschichtswege 9 20200626 DSC2488.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 17:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegweiser an der Lessingstraße 20200626 DSC2483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 22:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:VirtualBox Windows XP Bootscreen 23 01 2020 15 47 34.png

File:VirtualBox Windows XP Bootscreen 23 01 2020 15 47 34.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted software/logo Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

17jiangz1 (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Es war kein absichtlicher Verstoß. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiller-Gymnasium Zweigstelle Altstädter Schule 20200626 DSC2558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 14:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiller-Gymnasium Zweigstelle Altstädter Schule 20200626 DSC2552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum Bayrisches Vogtland Eingang DSC2034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Quite soft (although IMHO good enough). Do you think you can do something about the overexposed sky? It is not a deal breaker for me, but would be cool if you could. In general the picture looks quite bright to me. --Domob 10:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)  Done Tried to darken the image, thanks for the hint --PantheraLeo1359531 15:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Much better, thanks! Good quality for me now. --Domob 17:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigstraße 35 Hof 20200626 DSC2514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 19:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BLM-Demo Hof 20200620 DSC2235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals --Ermell 17:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks, perspective corrected --PantheraLeo1359531 08:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Videos by Terra X

Hi there, when you upload the next three videos, could you add them to "Category:Videos by Terra X without subtitle file so that I know to add a German subs track? Thank you JimKillock (talk) 09:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I will recognize that. Thank you :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Frontansicht JCRG Hof mit Werbebanner 07052019.jpg

File:Frontansicht JCRG Hof mit Werbebanner 07052019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcornelius (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Goethekeks auf Tisch 15052019.jpg

File:Goethekeks auf Tisch 15052019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcornelius (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:JCRG Hof Blick von Vorplatz auf Poster 20190915 255.jpg

File:JCRG Hof Blick von Vorplatz auf Poster 20190915 255.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcornelius (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schild Bernhard-Lichtenberg-Platz Hof 20200626 DSC2569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Saaleradweg

Hallo PantheraLeo, du hattest o.g. Cat. angelegt. Das ist etwas unglücklich, da es ja schon die Category:Saale-Radwanderweg gibt, die ich gerade etwas nach Ländern strukturiert habe. Deine Bilder sind jetzt direkt unter Category:Saale-Radwanderweg in Bavaria. In deinem Falle müsste deine Cat. "Saaleradweg in Hof" heißen, dann passt sie als Unter-Cat. unter die Bavaria-Cat. Nun ist sie erstmal leer, evtl. wird sie irgendwann gelöscht.... Nur, damit du dich nicht wunderst... Schöne Grüße --Catatine (talk) 09:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Alles klar, vielen Dank für den Hinweis, Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

PS: Bei der Wucht an Kategorien übersieht man manchmal bestehende :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! COVID-19-Hinweisschild Hof 20200626 DSC2465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sehr ungünstiger Blickwinkel, niedriger wäre deutlich besser gewesen. Macht eine Perspektivkorrektur hier Sinn? So oder so sollten die störenden, abgeschnittenen Bereiche links und rechts entfernt werden. --Carschten 14:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)  Done Würde ich nicht sagen, der Aufsteller ist relativ niedrig, diese Perspektive spiegelt gut die Ansicht des Betrachters (der Mensch) wider --PantheraLeo1359531 13:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)  Support okay for me now --Carschten 13:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tür Marienkirche Hof 20200626 DSC2527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you not remove the plate for a few minutes? -- Spurzem 16:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 17:28, 1 July 2020 (UTC) @Spurzem: Good idea, but the concerning people would be angry otherwise :D --PantheraLeo1359531 16:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhombenwelt 10K HQ OpenCL 20200703.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tote Taube am Bismarckturm Hof 20200620 DSC2439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Thank you for the wonderful motif. Btw what is a dead cadaver? --Palauenc05 15:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)  Info Good question, it is just a dead pigeon :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Videos by Terra X

Hi there, I uploaded a couple of missing files today but accidentally duplicated one, I have tagged mine for deletion. I am adding each file to both category:Videos by Terra X and category:Videos by Terra X without subtitle file so it's clear what is uploaded. Also, the Videos by Terra X category gives a number which should correspond to the number of files at ZDF, if they are all tagged that way. Hope that's helpful.

OK, I understand, and if one file gets at leat one subtitle, it leaves the category:Videos by Terra X without subtitle file? --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

yes exactly - and the first subtitle file is almost certainly German, so would go to category:Videos by Terra X with German subtitle file it is very hard to translate without the German text first. JimKillock (talk) 16:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Holzbau GSK Hof 20200704 DSC2631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments composition is not spectacular, nevertheless QI for me --EV Raudtee 14:06, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abschnitt GSK Hof 20200704 DSC2619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 03:19, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abschnitt GSK Hof 20200704 DSC2608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --EV Raudtee 14:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tote Taube am Bismarckturm Hof 20200620 DSC2435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The resolution is good enough for the scattered remnants to be photographed in this way with their reations to each other seen, but still also be examined closer on the full-size image. --Blood Red Sandman 12:29, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klostertor 2 20200626 DSC2492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quite soft and the area in the sun seems overexposed, but overall it shows the subject good enough for QI in my opinion. --Domob 11:47, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Textur einer Ziegelwand 20200704 DSC2676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostfassade Altbau GSK Hof 20200704 DSC2674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Externe Treppe GSK Hof 20200704 DSC2665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 01:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Externe Treppe GSK Hof 20200704 DSC2659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 01:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen Ausfahrt freihalten 20200704 DSC2640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 11:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Holzbau GSK Hof 20200704 DSC2630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuckarbeiten Altstadt 29 20200626 DSC2576.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 16:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks, more cats added --PantheraLeo1359531 16:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC) Is that a pharmacy? then please add "Pharmacy signs in Germany‎" --Poco a poco 09:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC) It is not, it is a building of "Commerzbank", so I added some other ctas :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Wärschtlamo 20200626 DSC2539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhombische Schnittstelle HQ OpenCL 10K 20200705.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Schild JGAW Hof 20200414 102743.jpg

Hi PantheraLeo1359531, rein urheberrechtlich ist das keine Notwendigkeit zur Lösung. Entscheidend ist die ursprüngliche Intention es dauerhaft aufzustellen. Hab die Löschung trotzdem ausgeführt, da Foto ungenutzt.

Schade um all die Fotos von der Dreieinigkeitskirche (Hof). Hast du mal versucht, zumindest für die Kunstwerke eine Genehmigung der Künstler zu bekommen; manchmal klappt das. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Danke für die Arbeit, ja, ich dachte, da das Gebäude ein öffentliches ist, dass das kein Problem sei. Aber ich lerne aus meinen Fehlern :). Ich kann es mal versuchen, Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bäckerei weist auf COVID-19-Maßnahmen hin Hof 20200620 DSC2381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 01:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Holzbau GSK Hof 20200704 DSC2622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straße am Pfaffenteich Hof 20200710 DSC2693.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infoschild am Krematorium Hof 20200712 DSC2712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 13:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tür Krematorium Hof 20200712 DSC2710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 13:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talsperre Pirk Seitenansicht 20200712 DSC2727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK imo. --ArildV 06:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stausee an Talsperre Pirk 20200712 DSC2741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 13:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen Teilung Deutschlands 20200712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talsperre Pirk von Weitem 20200712 DSC2723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 19:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weg zur Talsperre Pirk 20200712 DSC2717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 19:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bäume am Stausee Talsperre Pirk 20200712 DSC2747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 18:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weg auf Talsperre Pirk 20200712 DSC2739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 18:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talsperre Pirk Seitenansicht 20200712 DSC2724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 18:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talsperre Pirk Brücke 20200712 DSC2754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talsperre Pirk Staumauer 20200712 DSC2749.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talsperre Pirk Kubikmeter 20200712 DSC2761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treppe bei Talsperre Pirk 20200712 DSC2788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 23:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anlage an Staumauer Pirk 20200712 DSC2770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 13:08, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abschnitt Staumauer Talsperre Pirk 20200712 DSC2785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abschnitt Staumauer Talsperre Pirk 20200712 DSC2784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Fotoserie Breslau 20190721 009.jpg

File:Fotoserie Breslau 20190721 009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrei (talk) 11:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bürgerhaus Trogen 20201002 DSC4218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evangelisches Gemeindehaus Trogen 20201002 DSC4211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A branch covers the name of the building, but it's not so critical to me. --Lion-hearted85 14:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tür Pfarrkirche Trogen 20201002 DSC4206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. If you have some room on the left, a wider crop would be beneficial. --Lion-hearted85 14:30, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleiner Brunnen Trogen 20201002 DSC4257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwache Trogen Wandbild DSC4249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaukas Imbiss Trogen 20201002 DSC4193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a slight perspective correction (verticals). Aperture could be smaller (not enough depth for the whole building to be sharp) but most of it is good --Trougnouf 20:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks, perspective corrected --PantheraLeo1359531 11:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC) It's much better, now just needs a -0.48 degrees rotation --Trougnouf 19:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, rotated --PantheraLeo1359531 18:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you ! --Trougnouf 19:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turm in Trogen 20201002 DSC4166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but I would make it a big brighter. --Aristeas 09:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks, subject brightened --PantheraLeo1359531 11:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. I assume that the lamp post at the left is leaning in reality. --Aristeas 09:24, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwache Trogen Gesamtansicht 20201002 DSC4235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you reduce the cropp on the right, to show a bit more room next to the lamp post? --Augustgeyler 07:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks, I found another image perspective, this should fit better (although without lamp) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good idea! --Augustgeyler 21:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tor zum Friedhof Trogen 20201002 DSC4346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IntelTesla 15:56, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windpark Trogen I + II 20201002 DSC4344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IntelTesla 15:56, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kriegsgefallenendenkmal Trogen 20201002 DSC4342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IntelTesla 15:56, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausgestellte Glocke Trogen 20201002 DSC4333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IntelTesla 15:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kriegsgefallenendenkmal Trogen 20201002 DSC4327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IntelTesla 15:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Löwenmähne HQ OpenCL 8K AA 20201010 Standard.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Isn't there a category for fractal images that should be added, though? -- Ikan Kekek 02:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Trogen 20201011 DSC4924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tesla 17:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evangelisches Gemeindehaus Trogen 20201002 DSC4208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volunteer fire department in Trogen (Upper Franconia), front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An der Zech, Trogen 20201011 DSC4957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwache Trogen Infoschild DSC4252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The door is leaning in --Poco a poco 19:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC) {info} Almost, the information board is crooked. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Sorry, I didn't get it, what do you mean? --Poco a poco 20:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC) No problem, the board is not vertical to the ground --PantheraLeo1359531 15:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC) Maybe, but the door should be straight --Poco a poco 19:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Image adjusted --PantheraLeo1359531 16:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandmalerei Bäckerei Peetz Trogen 20201002 DSC4225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Füttern verboten-Schild Trogen 20201011 DSC4954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartehäusle in Trogen An der Zech 20201002 DSC4168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church in Trogen, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorsicht Schulkinder Hof 20200920 141630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:20, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleum Trogen 20201002 DSC4359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straße Am Gäßlein Trogen 20201011 DSC4942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:28, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tor Mausoleum Trogen 20201002 DSC4374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:10, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weg auf Friedhof Trogen 20201002 DSC4349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrschaftliches Anwesen Trogen 20201011 DSC4943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:10, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Säulenkapitell Mausoleum Trogen 20201002 DSC4384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tor Mausoleum Trogen 20201002 DSC4376.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This picture would benefit from a crop to show the door and the stone frame only (same for it's right hand sibling) --Virtual-Pano 08:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks, image cropped --PantheraLeo1359531 11:54, 23 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality - new crop complements the title --Virtual-Pano 23:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denkschrift an Vermisste und Gefallenen der K.gemeinde Trogen 20201002 DSC4393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would raise the shadows a bit --MB-one 18:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, shadows raised --PantheraLeo1359531 11:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good now --MB-one 11:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infoschild Bürgerpark Trogen 20201021 DSC4426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitzende graue Mieze 20201026 DSC5103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus Hof 20201027 DSC5191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! COA Trogen Feuerwehr 20201002 164456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rathaus Hof (Saale), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please no offense. But can't the building also be photographed on a bright day? I am amazed that the photo was rated as a quality image. -- Spurzem ( talk) 13:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

The reactions surprise me, to be honest :D. Thank you for the suggestion, but there are several problems IMO. 1. Hof is a city where bright days are very rare. It is very usual to get a cloudy or dizzy day. 2. A really bright day could make handling over- and underexposed areas very hard, especially when the light source is behind the building. This image is good for me, because every part of the image is well visible (no blown or dark parts) and the exposure is homogene --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

I think you should try to lighten the building and the sky separately and make them "friendlier". But let's see what others say about it. -- Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment This image is underexposed and the argument is not convincing. It could be withdrawn from the competition and wait for better conditions to be redone. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, it's underexposed, but quite sharp. So please try to brighten it, and a crop at the bottom and top would be nice, too. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for the review, brightened and crop at the bottom --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:50, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
• Still underexposed, but as long as no better one is available, this is the  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 23:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klosterstraße 30 (Sex-Shop) Hof 20201027 DSC5220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regenbogenfahne bei Mödlareuth - Grenzenlos bunt 20201003 DSC4699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 19:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mödlareuth-Schild 20201003 DSC4662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mödlareuth-Schild 20201003 DSC4661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mödlareuth-Schild 20201003 DSC4660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mödlareuth-Schild 20201003 DSC4659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 17:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandelbrot-Menge mit OrbitTrap 20201028 100It.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 03:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tic-Tac-Toe Mödlareuth 20201003 DSC4494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:43, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ansicht der Mandelbox 16K OpenCL 20201026.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1080p - Eva Braun-Reel 8 of 8Eb-yFC8ixyc.webm

Copyright status: File:1080p - Eva Braun-Reel 8 of 8Eb-yFC8ixyc.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:1080p - Eva Braun-Reel 8 of 8Eb-yFC8ixyc.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done License tag corrected --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rhombische Schnittstelle HQ OpenCL 10K 20200705.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rhombische Schnittstelle HQ OpenCL 10K 20200705.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstein Verdienste Helmut Kohl 20201003 DSC4710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Mödlareuth 20201003 DSC4720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Mödlareuth 20201003 DSC4717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstein 1989 Mödlareuth 20201003 DSC4747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:47, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstein 1989 Mödlareuth 20201003 DSC4743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windräder nahe Mödlareuth 20201003 DSC4782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle OC 24G, 24576 MiB GDDR6X Front 20201114 DSC5880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:16, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel Mödlareuth 20201003 DSC4722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The "Description English:" is in German, please translate. --Tagooty 08:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle am Rosenbühl 20201018 DSC4981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofer Straße und Schild nach Mödlareuth 20201003 DSC4816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Empfangszeichen Töpen 20201003 DSC4824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windräder nebst grüner Wiese 20201003 DSC4772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bigger one looks tilted --Poco a poco 17:58, 15 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks, image adjusted --PantheraLeo1359531 16:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Not perfect as the one on the left and right could be more straight, but close enough I guess --Poco a poco 16:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natur um Mödlareuth 20201003 DSC4779.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Max-Reger-Straße Hof 20201018 DSC5002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle am Rosenbühl 20201018 DSC4997.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochspannungsturm Töpen DSC4802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Text "MAN KANN NICHT ALLES BAGGERN" 20201003 DSC4727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitzbank in Gemeinde Töpen 20201003 DSC4822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PUTZFRAU auf Straße 20201003 DSC4806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JCRG-Logo an der Max-Reger-Straße 20201018 DSC5008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is fine but I'd expect a cat about the subject --Poco a poco 18:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Thank you, cat added --PantheraLeo1359531 11:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle am Rosenbühl 20201018 DSC4989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Where is the construction site, I see mainly grass. I would cut it out a bit otherwise the title makes no sense. --Ermell 17:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Thank you, image cropped --PantheraLeo1359531 11:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verlassener Bahnhof 20201121 DSC6246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 21:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:Autotranslate

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Creative Commons-Clips zur freien Nutzung – einfach erklärt (Terra X, ZDF).webm

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 19:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Template:Done Lizenztemplate wurde korrigiert, Lizenz nun korrekt angegeben. License template corrected, now the license is correctly given --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 ([[User talk:PantheraLeo1359531#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, BASEPAGENAME! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Template:VICpromoted --VICBot2 ([[User talk:VICBot2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)