User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 34

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrenbruennchen Ratssaal1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zewen Bildstockaufsatz 1718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer Gedenkstein 1923 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Schleidweiler Kreuzkapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer Fürstenkreuz 1651 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer Hochgerichtskreuz (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier alte Wache Cläre Prem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of crucifixion group (1927) in Zemmer-Schleidweiler, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Ezarateesteban 16:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Mannebach (Germany), Hauptstraße / Wiesenweg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Upper part of a wayside shrine (1718) depicting a crucifixion scene in Trier-Zewen, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used .--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms of councillor family Recking at St. Gangolf's church, Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms (1677) of councillor Philipp Laux at historical building Krahnenstraße 30-31 in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 21:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross, so-called "Altenhofer Galgenkreuz" (1499) near Oberweis, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:17, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of St. Peter at historical building Porta-Nigra-Platz 5, Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 21:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1608) near Eisenach (Eifel), Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zemmer Fürstenkreuz 1651 (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zemmer Fürstenkreuz 1651 (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Woche Der Tag von Potsdam cover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igel-Liersberg Wegekreuz 1810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful image and good quality -- Spurzem 18:43, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Osterfeld 150 Pfennig 1921.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Rodt Bucheckerkreuz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cover of the special edition Der Tag von Potsdam (Potsdam Day), on March 21, 1933, in in the weekly newspaper Die Woche..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:48, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Schleidweiler Sankt Martin und Thekla Grabkreuz Pfarrer Jacob Biwer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Schleidweiler Sankt Martin und Thekla Grabkreuz 1837 Pfarrer Jonas Kalbusch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Schleidweiler Sankt Martin und Thekla Grabkreuz 1948 Pfarrer Peter Gerhards.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Rodt Bucheckerkreuz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Schleidweiler Quertner Kreuzchen (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Rodt Wegekreuz (1693) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lizenzangaben fehlen! --Ermell 20:17, 11 March 2023 (UTC) Sind da, hatte es schon selbst bemerkt. --Palauenc05 22:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine in the rear wall of Saint Mary's Chapel (Igel-Liersberg), Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary's Chapel (Igel-Liersberg), Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1810) near Igel, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Beautiful image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:30, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Daufenbach Bernhardskreuz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Rodt Pferdetränke (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross, so-called Bucheckerkreuz, near Zemmer-Rodt, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1693) in Zemmer-Rodt, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Rodt Kriegergedächtniskreuz (1914) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer Daufenbach Pfeilerkreuz 1900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Schleidweiler Quertner Kreuzchen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Rodt Pferdetränke (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
So-called Quertner Kreuzchen, near Zemmer-Schleidweiler, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1900) between Zemmer-Schleidweiler and Zemmer-Daufenbach, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 13:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
So-called Kriegergedächtniskreuz (1914), near Zemmer-Rodt, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery cross for Rev. Jacob Biwer at parish church Sankt Martin in Zemmer-Schleidweiler, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross, so-called Bernhardskreuz, near Zemmer-Daufenbach, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 13:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer Hochgerichtskreuz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 02:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier alter Moselpegel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 22:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier alter Moselpegel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Brüderkrankenhaus Brunnen des Lebens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemburg Wegekreuz Givenich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Brüderkrankenhaus Wegekreuz Kaiserin Augusta (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Sankt Irminen (1740) Westflügel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, right time of the year to take this photo --Michielverbeek 23:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross at the hospital Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former stream gauge (1897) in Trier, Germany (northwest view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemburg Wegekreuz Givenich (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Brüderkrankenhaus Brunnen des Lebens (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Alter Krahnen (Süd).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the white part at the top-right side needs cropping out. --Mike Peel 21:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. --Palauenc05 21:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in the commune Rosport-Mompach, Luxembourg, near the village Givenich (southwest view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brunnen des Lebens (fountain of life) in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fragment of a wayside cross (1607) in Wallendorf (Eifel), Germany, Sauertalstraße 37 / Holunderweg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western facade of monastery St. Irminen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:54, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Brüderkrankenhaus Maria-Hilf-Kapelle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Modern primat 20:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Wegekreuz Sickingenstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good if you fix the left crop --Poco a poco 19:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC) @ Poco a poco  Done Thanks for the hint. --Palauenc05 09:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holsthum wegekreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zemmer-Rodt Bucheckerkreuz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Die Woche Der Tag von Potsdam cover.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Die Woche Der Tag von Potsdam cover.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier-Pfalzel Sankt Martin Bildstock (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Brüderkrankenhaus Brunnen des Lebens (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice subject and good photo, but, please check background verticals (windows, lamppost, etc.) --LexKurochkin 18:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)  Comment Actually I don't think its necessary here, as the background doesn't play any role. It's not an architectural image, and we shouldn't overdo those corrections. Maybe I'll straighten it anyway later, although I think it'superfluous. --Palauenc05 18:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)  Neutral Well, I respect your position, but don't agree with it. --LexKurochkin 12:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Perspektive correct now, good quality and beautiful image -- Spurzem 23:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (19^th century) in Trier, Sickingenstraße / Olewigerstraße..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier-Pfalzel Sankt Martin Bildstock (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Brüderkrankenhaus Brunnen des Lebens (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maria-Hilf-Kapelle at Brüderkrankenhaus Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)