User talk:Pa3ems

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pa3ems!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Pa3ems!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tacozijl Joodse begraafplaats-2.JPG was uncategorized on 14 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tacozijl Joodse begraafplaats.JPG was uncategorized on 14 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tacozijl Joodse begraafplaats-3.JPG was uncategorized on 14 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tacozijl Joodse begraafplaats-4.JPG was uncategorized on 14 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tacozijl Joodse begraafplaats-1.JPG was uncategorized on 14 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lochem Joodse begraafplaats-1.JPG was uncategorized on 7 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lochem Joodse begraafplaats.JPG was uncategorized on 7 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Hattem Joodse begraafplaats.JPG was uncategorized on 18 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bolsward - Broerekerk.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bolsward - Broerekerk-2.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kruis 3-10-2008 12-59-36.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Dalfsen - cemetery-34.jpg was uncategorized on 16 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Dalfsen - cemetery-36.jpg was uncategorized on 16 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Dalfsen - cemetery-38.jpg was uncategorized on 16 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Nordhorn DL Einkaufzentrum XXXLutz-4.jpg was uncategorized on 10 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Vollenhove - grote kerk-12.jpg was uncategorized on 22 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Waterloopbos-2.jpg was uncategorized on 22 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Texel - Erebegraafplaats Loladze-6.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:47, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Cemetery Epe-G.L. Fiddler.JPG was uncategorized on 15 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please categorize !!![edit]

Hi Pa3ems, please keep in mind that only well categorized images can be found. Uploading of images without a usefull categorizing doesn't make any sense! For instance your images of jewish cemeteries (depending on where you took the images) will belong to a subcategory of Category:Jewish cemeteries by country. Please also categorize at least the city where you took the photo. For further instructions please read Commons:Categories. -- Ies (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Pa3ems - Ik heb de prachtige fotos van de verschillende joodse begraafplaatsen in hun eigen foldertje ondergebracht bv Category:Jewish cemetery, Tacozijl. Moch u nog meer fotos uploaden van dit (of enig ander onderwerp), dan kunt u zelf ook deze categorieën aanmaken door simpelweg [[Category:Jewish cemetery, (plaatsnaam)]] aan uw bestand toe te voegen, en vervolgens op de rode link te klikken en een nieuwe categorie aan te maken (voeg een bovenliggende categorie toe - bv [[Category:Jewish cemeteries in Gelderland]] en klik op Opslaan). Mvg, -- Deadstar (msg) 10:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Pa3ems - nog even een opmerking - hier heb ik de door u toegevoegde categorieën weer verwijderd, aangezien het voldoende is om het in de meest specifieke categorie te zetten.

In dit geval: De specifieke categorie

Category:Jewish cemetery, Harderwijk is in z'n geheel toegevoegd aan
- Category:Jewish cemeteries in Gelderland, die deel uitmaakt van
  - Category:Jewish cemeteries in the Netherlands, die op de beurt weer deel uitmaakt van
    - Category:Jewish cemeteries by country, die valt binnen
      - Category:Jewish cemeteries.

Het is dus niet nodig om alle bovenliggende categorieën apart toe te voegen op alle afbeeldingen. Voor meer informatie rondom categoriseren, kijk op Commons:Categorieën. Alvast bedankt. (Ik heb de categorieën op de bestaande afbeeldingen aangepast). -- Deadstar (msg) 09:17, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Ossenzijl, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:04, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories moeten wel in het Engels zijn[edit]

Dag, gelieve even in Category:Rijksmonumenten en Category:Rijksmonumenten in North Brabant rond te zwerven voor de juiste Engelse categorie benamingen. Beste groet. --Foroa (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Een aantal punten[edit]

Beste Pa3ems,

Allereerst wil ik u bedanken voor de vele mooie foto's van Nederlands erfgoed, vooral de foto's van rijksmonumenten doen mij deugd in het licht van de rijksmonumentenlijsten op Wikipedia.

Ik werd echter gewezen op de categorisatie die door jou aan sommige afbeeldingen werd gegeven. Deze week af van de gebruikelijke categorisatiestructuur, waardoor soms 2 categorieën voor hetzelfde onderwerp ontstonden. Ik ben nu al jouw bestanden langs gegaan, en heb vele aanpassingen gedaan, en categorieën die buiten de gebruikelijke structuur vielen laten verwijderen. Ik zal hier even wat punten opschrijven die van toepassing zijn bij categorieën.

Voor rijksmonumenten is het het handigste om deze gewoon in de gemeentecategorie te plaatsen, elke gemeente heeft een categorie, die structuur hebben we aan het begin opgezet, de afzonderlijke plaatsen hebben vaak geen eigen categorie, zolang die afzonderlijke plaatsen niet echt veel rijksmonumenten hebben (denk aan minder dan 20 of zoiets) dan is een eigen categorie ook niet echt nodig.
Categorienamen horen in het Engels, kijk eens naar vergelijkbare categorieën hoe die genoemd zijn, en volg dat ongeveer. Dus Churches in XXXX bijvoorbeeld.
de categorieën voor de rijksmonumenten zijn in de vorm "Rijksmonumenten in XXXX" en niet in de vorm "Rijksmonumenten XXXX" (hierdoor ontstond af en toe dubbele categorisatie)
Foto's hoeven niet in categorie als de categorie waar de foto al in staat al in die categorie zit. Bijvoorbeeld: een rijksmonument in Noordoostpolder hoeft enkel in Category:Rijksmonumenten in Noordoostpolder en niet ook nog in Category:Rijksmonumenten in Flevoland en Category:Noordoostpolder. Omdat de Category:Rijksmonumenten in Noordoostpolder al in die laatste 2 categorieën staat.
Tot slot zet u na de pipe (dit: "|" teken) vaak de plaats waar de afbeelding gemaakt is bijvoorbeeld in de vorm: Hattem, dat is niet de bedoeling, de tekst na de pipe zorgt namelijk voor de sortering van de afbeeldingen in de Category:Rijksmonumenten in Hattem, die moeten dus niet allemaal bij de H gesorteerd, het beste is het om geen sortering op te geven in de categorieën voor gebouwen.

Naast de problemen met categorieën ben ik nog wat punten tegengekomen.

U plaatst watermerken op vele van uw foto's. Door uw foto's vrij te geven is het anderen echter toegestaan deze watermerken gewoon weg te halen, dit zal in veel gevallen waarschijnlijk ook gebeuren omdat men het beleid heeft deze weg te halen zie daarvoor deze pagina. Het mooiste zou zijn als u bereid bent de foto's zonder watermerk vrij te geven.

U heeft foto's onder 2 namen geüpload: Onder de naam "Pa3ems" zoals bijvoorbeeld deze foto. Via uw visitekaartje zie ik dat achter deze gebruikersnaam Rob Kreukniet schuilt.

Daarnaast heeft u foto's geïpload onder de naam "A.E. van Kooten". Zoals bijvoorbeeld deze foto.

Op beide foto's heeft u staan dat die eigen werk is, echter dat lijkt me dan niet helemaal te kloppen. Kunt u uitleggen hoe de situatie precies zit? Heeft A.E. van Kooten u toestemming gegeven om zijn werken op Wikipedia te zetten?

Er is nog een afbeelding waarbij ik nieuwsgierig ben naar de achtergrond. Namelijk deze afbeelding uit 1949, u geeft aan dat deze eigen werk is. Dat is wel bijzonder voor een 62 jaar oude afbeelding, kunt u het verhaal hierachter vertellen?

Als laatste nog deze afbeelding. Daarmee is met het uploaden iets misgegaan, u heeft 9 verschillende foto's onder dezelfde naam geüpload, er is er nu dus maar 1 bruikbaar. Misschien is het leuk om de andere versies nogmaals onder een andere naam opnieuw te uploaden.

Tot slot wil ik u nogmaals heel hartelijk bedanken voor de vele prachtige erfgoedfoto's die echt een verrijking voor Wikipedia zijn.

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 17:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Basvb,

Bedankt voor je bericht. En ik zal het een en ander uitleggen. Laat ik voorop stellen dat ik al spijt als haren op mijn hoofd heb dat ik er aan begonnen ben om foto's op wikimedia te zetten maar dat terzijde. Ik ontdekte, nadat ik behoorlijk wat foto's op wikimedia had geplaatst, dat ik fout zat met de wijze waarop ik de categorieën had aangebracht. Er bleek al een bestaande structuur te zijn die ik in eerste instantie niet kon vinden. Daarom was ik al begonnen om de door mij aangebrachte cat's weer te verwijderen, maar dat vergt even wat tijd en ik heb ondertussen bericht gekregen dat de foto's weer verwijderd moeten worden. Er mag geen watermerk in staan. Dus ga ik morgen aan de slag om ze te laten verwijderen. Of ik nieuwe foto's ga plaatsen is afhankelijk van de manier waarop ik kan voorkomen dat een ander met mijn foto's aan de haal gaat, iets was eigenlijk de aanleiding was om foto's zelf op wikimedia te plaatsen. Dat er bij sommige foto's eigen werk staat met de naam van A.E. van Kooten dat klopt. Mijn vriend is niet zodanig computervaardig dat hij ze zelf op het internet kan plaatsen dus doe ik dat en zet zijn naam erbij. Zodra hij weer een serie foto's gemaakt heeft stuurt hij ze naar mij toe en ik bewerk en zet ze op internet. Een constructie die we al vele jaren tot volle tevredenheid gebruiken. We werken allebei voor een andere wiki n.l. www.reliwiki.nl en daar leveren we foto's voor.

Groeten en nogmaals bedankt voor je bericht.

Rob erfgoedfotografie 18:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

ps. Die foto van het graf van Generaal Spoor is inderdaad eigen werk en gemaakt door mijn vader.

erfgoedfotografie 18:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Dat een en ander mis is gegaan met de categorieën is geen probleem hoor, zulk soort dingen komen altijd wel weer goed. Belangrijk is wel de vraag wat u met de foto's wilt. Vrijgeven voor gebruik op Wikipedia houdt namelijk in dat iedereen dat bestand mag hergebruiken, ook voor bijvoorbeeld commerciële doelen. Volgens mij is overigens de procedure met watermerken niet dat deze verwijderd worden, maar dat deze op een lijst komen te staan om die watermerken weg te halen. De belangrijke vraag is dus vooral wat u wilt dat er allemaal met uw afbeeldingen gedaan kan worden. Wat Gebruiker Ouddorp deed, het plaatsen van andermans foto's, is overigens iets wat gewoon een auteursrechtenschending is. Dat is dus gewoon niet toegestaan, wat er tegen dat aan de haal gaan gedaan kan worden is dus zodra dat ontdekt wordt de afbeeldingen verwijderen.

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 18:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Basvb,

Dat foto's van mij, of moet ik zeggen van ons, gebruikt worden daar hebben we geen enkele moeite mee, daar worden ze voor gemaakt, anders had ik ze niet op wikimedia geplaatst. Waar ik wel de grootste moeite mee heb dat een ander ze publiceert onder zijn naam. Ik ga eens rustig uitproberen over hoe ik in plaats van het watermerk in de exif informatie onze namen kan vermelden.

Groeten

erfgoedfotografie 19:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Volgens mij zijn er wel licenties (misschien zelfs allemaal wel) waarbij de naam van de auteur vermelden verplicht is bij hergebruik. De auteur moet bij herpublicaties in ieder geval altijd te achterhalen zijn. (op Wikipedia gaat dit door op het bestand te klikken en naar de gegevens te kijken.

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jacobiparochie-jakobi.JPG[edit]

File:Jacobiparochie-jakobi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Condor3d (talk) 17:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attend the award ceremony of the Dutch Wiki Loves Monuments 2011[edit]

English | Nederlands | +/−

Dear Pa3ems,

We've already thanked you for your contribution to the Wiki Loves monuments photo contest. But with a contest, there are prizes to win!

The award ceremony will be held in Utrecht on Saturday the 5th of November, at the end of the Dutch Wikimedia Conference at Media Plaza, held the same day. Media Plaza is located next to the Central Station in Utrecht, in the middle of the shopping mall.
Admittance is free from 3pm onwards, just in time to catch the last few presentations at the WCN. Off course you can join us for the full day conference as well and enjoy a day full of information on wiki's and cultural heritage. After the ceremony, our location sponsor generously offers a free drink to everyone!

Remember: in order to make a chance to win, you need a confirmed e-mail address added to your Commons settings.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team and the Dutch Wikimedia Conference team

Sent by Lucia Bot^talk in 23:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments NL[edit]

Beste Pa3ems,

Alle winnende foto's van Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 zijn ondertussen gedrukt als kalenders.

Wikimedia Nederland stelt er hier 100 van beschikbaar voor alle uploaders van de afbeeldingen. Geef op de bijgevoegde link je naam en adres en we sturen je kosteloos een exemplaar toe, als dank voor je deelname! Let op: op = op!! Bestel hier één kalender per adres.

Ook dit jaar zal er in september weer een Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments plaatsvinden, als onderdeel van de internationale wedstrijd. Meer informatie vind je tegen die tijd op http://www.wikilovesmonuments.nl/.
Ook zoeken wij nog vrijwilligers die het leuk vinden om mee te helpen met het organiseren van de landelijke wedstrijd of van locale evenementen (een "Wiki takes..." in je eigen woonplaats dus!). Meer informatie daarover vind je op de wiki van Wikimedia Nederland.

Sent by Lucia Bot^talk in 14:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Churches_in_Kencot,_Oxfordshire[edit]

Category:Churches_in_Kencot,_Oxfordshire has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Motacilla (talk) 20:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stolpersteine Franeker[edit]

Dag Pa3ems, ik zag zojuist je foto van de Stolpersteine in Franeker. Weet je misschien wanneer die geplaatst zijn, en of er in Franeker nog meer liggen? Ik kan ze niet vinden op de site van Gunter Demnig, en ook niet elders op het web. Ze ontbreken nog in de Lijst van Stolpersteine in Nederland (die ik bijhoud). Groet, Kattiel (talk) 20:32, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oei, ik zie dat ik een fout heb gemaakt. Ik zal het gelijk corrigeren. Het moet Harlingen zijn. Ik liep er toevallig tijdens een bezoek aan de Visserijdagen tegen aan. De coördinaten die erbij staan zijn wel juist. Over de plaatsing heb ik geen info het was een toevalstreffer.

Rob K. aka pa3ems - erfgoedfotografie 01:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Dankjewel, ik heb de foto in de lijst geplaatst. Daar staan ook gegevens over de plaatsing (20 augustus 2012~, 45 Stolpersteine op 16 adressen). Groet, Kattiel (talk) 07:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Pa3ems,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 01:47, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

WLM Barnstar[edit]

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!

Cats[edit]

Hallo, ik zag dat je de subcategorie: 'Voormalige synagoge in Borculo' onderbracht bij 'Churches of Berkelland'. Dit lijkt me niet juist. Tempels, moskeeën en synagogen ed. zijn 'Religieus buildings', geen kerken, maar misschien zie ik iets over het hoofd? Vr. groet, --JanB46 (talk) 14:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ben het met je eens, het hoort er eigenlijk niet onder thuis het is geen kerk. Wellicht is rechtstreeks onder buildings in Borculo beter. Wellicht is het nog beter overal 'Churches in ....' te vervangen door 'Religieus buildings in....' want dit komt in vrijwel iedere stad voor. Vriendelijke groeten.

Rob K. aka pa3ems - erfgoedfotografie 14:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Medicines_of_Suriname[edit]

Category:Medicines_of_Suriname has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 10:44, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Hoogerwerf[edit]

hallo Pa3ems,

Hoe ben je tot de conclusie gekomen dat dit fort in België zou liggen? nl:Fort Sint Martijn hier staat een dergelijk fort in Nederland beschreven. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 12:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hierdoor:

http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zandvliet_(plaats)

Groeten uit Emmeloord,

Rob K. aka pa3ems - erfgoedfotografie 13:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok, vlak op de grens dus. Basvb (talk) 19:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:IJsselmuiden dorpskerk-9.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:IJsselmuiden dorpskerk-9.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 20:36, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Geen idee wat je bedoelt, er staat Auteur=pa3ems en permission=CC.

Rob K. aka pa3ems - erfgoedfotografie 00:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Pa3ems,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Pa3ems,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

⧼Wikibase-terms/Pa3ems⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Pa3ems,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kloosterkapel Van De Fraters Van Tilburg[edit]

Hello Pa3ems,

You added the monument ids 521036 and 526128 to the category mentioned above. I'm not sure whether this is correct. The address of the monument is Capucijnenstraat 76 in Tilburg, but the pictures are from a building at Gasthuisring 54 (See File:Overzicht complex - Tilburg - 20351089 - RCE.jpg and the same building at Google StreetView https://www.google.de/maps/@51.5622156,5.0774548,3a,90y,68.57h,83.1t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sg7ZF6hcT2GSXLsmnv3Z0MQ!2e0). I guess the pictures shown in the category show a different monument than it is described her: http://monumentenregister.cultureelerfgoed.nl/php/main.php?cAction=search&cOffset=1&cLimit=25&oOrder=ASC&cSubmit=1&sCompMonNr=521035. Can you please take a look to it? What do you think? Kind regards Bardenoki (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bardenoki,

You're right, this rm numbers belong to the old Kloosterkapel Van De Fraters Van Tilburg. This building is demolished. Thanks for noticing.

Kind regards,

--Rob K. aka pa3ems - erfgoedfotografie 11:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Pa3ems,

thanks for clarifying this. But I guess that the building is still existing and not demolished. File:Overzicht voorgevel klooster - Tilburg - 20343593 - RCE.jpg should be a picture of the chapel. And you can find this chapel still on Google StreetView: https://www.google.de/maps/place/Capucijnenstraat+76,+5025+LH+Tilburg,+Niederlande/@51.5531396,5.0757352,3a,89.9y,184.06h,86.24t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s4iYmuUPK6OUyvm_BPkfhMA!2e0!4m2!3m1!1s0x47c6be380ee728d5:0x61e0d400b7e1a585. Kind regards, Norbert (Bardenoki (talk) 13:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Bardenoki,

Yes...thanks, I've foud it, here are the images [1] and here the description in Dutch [2] the buildings still there and in use by a soundstudio en apartments. At the adress of te wikimedia-category I've added voormalig (former). Many thanks.

--Rob K. aka pa3ems - erfgoedfotografie 14:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen![edit]

Beste Pa3ems,

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is vorige week begonnen! Aan deze fotowedstrijd nemen dit jaar 54 landen deel, waaronder bijvoorbeeld Nederland, Groot Brittannië, Thailand, Rusland, Oekraïne, maar ook de eilanden Aruba, Bonaire, Curaçao, Saba, Sint Eustatius en Sint Maarten in de Nederlandse Caribean. Je wordt dus van harte uitgenodigd om te kijken tussen de deelnemende landen of jouw vakantieland er ook bij zit dit jaar en je foto's uit die landen ook te delen!

Net als voorgaande jaren hebben we prijzen voor de mooiste foto en de meeste foto's en een keus gemaakt voor een speciale categorie. Heb jij een foto gemaakt van een monument waarvan voor 1 september 2017 nog geen afbeelding op Wikimedia Commons bestond? Dan doet de afbeelding mee in de speciale categorie! Heeft een monument nog geen foto in de monumentenlijst op Wikipedia, dan is het aannemelijk dat we er nog geen foto van hadden. Om het zoeken naar monumenten zonder afbeelding wat makkelijker te maken, kun je op Wikipedia lijsten en een kaart van Nederland vinden.

Tot slot nodigen we je nog van harte uit om volgende week met ons op pad te gaan. Op zaterdag 16 september wandelen we tijdens een Wiki Takes rond in Hoorn: op zondag 17 september doen we hetzelfde in Leiden. Onder ervaren gidsen wandelen we langs monumenten in de stad en nemen we ruimschoots de tijd om de monumenten goed op de foto te zetten. Aanmelden verplicht en plaatsen gelimiteerd!
Tot en met 30 september heb je de tijd om je foto's up te loaden: de top 10 gaat door naar de internationale wedstrijd, waar de hoofdprijs de nieuwste Canon EOS 5D camera is!

Veel succes gewenst,
het Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments team 17:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

See [3]. --VanBuren (talk) 16:48, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:O.L._Vrouw_van_Lourdeskerk_(Heerlen)[edit]

Category:O.L._Vrouw_van_Lourdeskerk_(Heerlen) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Hans Erren (talk) 14:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

dubbele categorie voorgedragen voor verwijdering[edit]

Category:O.L. Vrouw van Lourdeskerk (Heerlen)[edit]

Category:O.L. Vrouw van Lourdeskerk (Heerlen) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hans Erren (talk) 07:56, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naamswijziging bestanden Boijl / Wapserveen[edit]

Dag, Pa3ems. Zojuist heb ik voor een achttal van door u geüploade bestanden een naamswijziging gevraagd, omdat het daarbij niet om de genoemde dorpskerk in Boijl ging, maar om de kerk te Wapserveen; de categorieën zijn al aangepast. Vriendelijke groet, Eissink (talk) 18:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC).[reply]

. Bedankt, klopt helemaal. Ik zie dat de bijbehorende coördinaten ook niet kloppen, die komen in Steenwijk uit. Mogelijk een conversiefout o.i.d. Als de renaming voltooid is zal ik de coördinaten aanpassen. Gr. Rob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pa3ems (talk • contribs) 19:24, 10 November 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sint-Lucaskerk (Vlaardingen)[edit]

Category:Sint-Lucaskerk (Vlaardingen) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 17:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

H. Servatius, Rutten[edit]

Beste Pa3ems, ik lees dat u ook wel op verzoek fotografeert in Emmeloord en mijn aandacht gaat momenteel uit naar een drietal schilderingen in het nabije Rutten. In de Servatiuskerk in Rutten zijn in de jaren tachtig (als ik me niet vergis) in drie nissen, rechts van het orgel, muurschilderingen aangebracht door de schilder Gerrit Pasman. Als u eens in de gelegenheid bent, zou u dan misschien die taferelen kunnen fotograferen voor plaatsing op Commons? Overigens ontbreken alhier ook verdere afbeeldingen van zowel in- als exterieur van die kerk. Ik hoor het graag, met vriendelijke groet, Jurgen Eissink (talk) 12:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Jurgen, Bedankt voor je bericht. Ik zal mijn best doen, maar het kan even duren, vanwege corona ben ik bijna niet thuis in Emmeloord. Er staan er een paar gedeeltelijk in Reliwiki maar ze verdienen een paar betere foto's. Rob K. aka pa3ems - beheerder Reliwiki 12:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Alvast mijn dank. Mvg, Jurgen Eissink (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Pa3ems. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 07:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry wasn't intentional
Rob K. Pa3ems - beheerder Reliwiki 13:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:H.M. Java 1935-5 in Nederlands Indië.jpg[edit]

Hello! Do you have better documentation for the history of this photo? I'm assuming you didn't take it yourself in 1935, but the page there says it's your "own work". Thanks! Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 19:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was made by my father who was in military service in Dutch East Indies at that time. I inherited that photo archive from him. Unfortunately, I do not have any more information.

Rob K. Pa3ems - beheerder Reliwiki 20:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for choosing to upload his photos—incredible! I've corrected the copyright info on the photo, as we have Template:Heirs-license for this situation. :-) Have a great day! Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 00:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Pa3ems

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Please categorize !!![edit]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Categories moeten wel in het Engels zijn[edit]

Een aantal punten[edit]

File:Jacobiparochie-jakobi.JPG[edit]

Attend the award ceremony of the Dutch Wiki Loves Monuments 2011[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments NL[edit]

Category:Churches_in_Kencot,_Oxfordshire[edit]

Stolpersteine Franeker[edit]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

WLM Barnstar[edit]

Cats[edit]

Category:Medicines_of_Suriname[edit]

Fort Hoogerwerf[edit]

Copyright status: File:IJsselmuiden dorpskerk-9.JPG[edit]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

Category:Kloosterkapel Van De Fraters Van Tilburg[edit]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen![edit]

Request for comment[edit]

Category:O.L._Vrouw_van_Lourdeskerk_(Heerlen)[edit]

dubbele categorie voorgedragen voor verwijdering[edit]

Category:O.L. Vrouw van Lourdeskerk (Heerlen)[edit]

Naamswijziging bestanden Boijl / Wapserveen[edit]

Category:Sint-Lucaskerk (Vlaardingen)[edit]

H. Servatius, Rutten[edit]

Reminder[edit]

File:H.M. Java 1935-5 in Nederlands Indië.jpg[edit]

Navigation menu

User talk:Pa3ems

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Please categorize !!![edit]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Categories moeten wel in het Engels zijn[edit]

Een aantal punten[edit]

File:Jacobiparochie-jakobi.JPG[edit]

Attend the award ceremony of the Dutch Wiki Loves Monuments 2011[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments NL[edit]

Category:Churches_in_Kencot,_Oxfordshire[edit]

Stolpersteine Franeker[edit]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

WLM Barnstar[edit]

Cats[edit]

Category:Medicines_of_Suriname[edit]

Fort Hoogerwerf[edit]

Copyright status: File:IJsselmuiden dorpskerk-9.JPG[edit]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

Category:Kloosterkapel Van De Fraters Van Tilburg[edit]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen![edit]

Request for comment[edit]

Category:O.L._Vrouw_van_Lourdeskerk_(Heerlen)[edit]

dubbele categorie voorgedragen voor verwijdering[edit]

Category:O.L. Vrouw van Lourdeskerk (Heerlen)[edit]

Naamswijziging bestanden Boijl / Wapserveen[edit]

Category:Sint-Lucaskerk (Vlaardingen)[edit]

H. Servatius, Rutten[edit]

Reminder[edit]

File:H.M. Java 1935-5 in Nederlands Indië.jpg[edit]

Navigation menu

Search