User talk:Nightflyer/Archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Schleswig-Holstein, Wedel, Stadtmuseum NIK 1175.jpg

File:Schleswig-Holstein, Wedel, Stadtmuseum NIK 1175.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Schleswig-Holstein, Wedel, Stadtmuseum NIK 1251.jpg

File:Schleswig-Holstein, Wedel, Stadtmuseum NIK 1251.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Hamburg, Hotel Deutsches Seemannsheim Hamburg DSC03782.JPG

File:Hamburg, Hotel Deutsches Seemannsheim Hamburg DSC03782.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Test test test test.jpg

Copyright status: File:Test test test test.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Test test test test.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderlügumer Binnendünen NIK 2073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:05, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Ostermoor, Nord-Ostsee-Kanal NIK 2746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quite good, but the shadows could be lighter and I'd consider cropping out the sign on the left. --Nefronus 06:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 Support Weak support. --Nefronus 14:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Bark, Wittenborner Heide NIK 6053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayern, Würzburg, Jüdischer Friedhof (Heidingsfeld) NIK 5045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huje, Kanuanlegeplatz an der Bekau NIK 0949.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Rostock, Skulptur am IGA-Park-Ufer NIK 7963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brokstedt, Bahnhof NIK 7822.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr Kleinbogen 1636-1643.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr Kleinbogen 1636-1643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Goodquality --Llez 05:40, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Albersdorf, Friedhof NIK 8538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Rosdorf, Landschaftschutzgebiet Waldfläche Wulfshorst NIK 6404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faehre Hohenhoern DSC01933.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenhörn, Fähranleger mit SchaBenHo-Stein NIK 2595.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo Nightflyer,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 18:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehrenhain der schleswig-holsteinischen Artillerie in Kellinghusen, ohne Gedenktafel NIK 2329.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Hochdonn, neue Fähre für den Nord-Ostsee-Kanal NIK 1813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Stepro 22:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordrhein-Westfalen, Xanten, LVR-Archäologischer Park Xanten NIK 4826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5496.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Velvet 06:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dithmarschen, Schrum, Ehrenmal NIK 6962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Albersdorf, Friedhof NIK 1723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Schmedeswurth, Ehrenmal NIK 2209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elsterheide, Ortsteil Bluno, Kirche NIK 5897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kuden, Ehrenmal NIK 1862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Frestedt, Ehrenmal NIK 2535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Friedrichskoog, Ehrenmal NIK 2228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Tellingstedt, Ehrenmal NIK 2059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
The left table is overexposed. --Steindy 20:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Neue Version. Gruss --Nightflyer 11:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hafen Hamburg, Flugzeug vor Elbphilharmonie IMG 3653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5518.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg, Elbphilharmonie IMG 3690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Barlt, Ehrenmal NIK 3181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 23:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rettungsmittel NIK 0838.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 22:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Reher, Kratt NIK 0330.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 13:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Pinneberg, Helgoland im Juli 2019 NIK 7613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 20:10, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nightflyer/Archive_9&oldid=659202707"