User talk:Nat/Archive 2

File:Manuel Merino 2020.jpg

under Legislative Decree N˚822, Sexta Disposición Complementaria, Transitoria y Final de la (Law No 28131) put in place in 2003 and still in effect, "images of government officials or texts (legislative, administrative, executive or judicial) published by the Government of Peru are not subject to copyright protection and are in the public domain

Image taken from flicks, from the account of "Presidencia del Perú" https://www.flickr.com/photos/presidenciaperu/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/presidenciaperu/50594831896/

What is the reason for deletion? I do not understand?--Htz67 (talk) 21:57, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

My reasoning at File:Niraj Singh Wiki.jpg's UDR

While I mostly agree with your !vote on that UDR, I thought I'd explain my reasoning here to be clear. I disagree that all "previously published works" should go to OTRS, because if that were the case, then OTRS volunteers like you would have a really hard time processing all of the emails coming to your system, because everyone would just send evidences of permission to the OTRS. So I thought, what could be an alternative to the heavily backlogged OTRS system? The first thing that came to my mind was the Facebook post. You are correct that the uploader is unlikely to be the subject of the photo, but the subject, which is clearly the same as the Facebook user on the post, could just confirm that Pranav.pgp2013 holds the copyright to the photo, like because they are the one who photographed him. So I was actually trying to make your lives easier here. :)

The copyright issue is also not moot as you thought because although the file was not indeed used at the time of deletion, the uploader clearly is going to use it for their draft on enwiki. So COM:PS, in the context of educational value, not copyright, can't be used as an opposing argument to undeletion here.

Again, I'm just explaining the reason of my comment there so that I could make myself clear, since you pinged me before you closed the UDR. Cheers! pandakekok9 02:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Peruvian constitution and laws

Regarding your comments in Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests about File:Carlos Garcia y Garcia.jpg, I will ask you respect our laws and constitution, this are the explanations:
- The text cited in works of the government, comes from Law 13714 of 1961, this law was repealed by Legislative Decree No. 822, (published on 24 April 1996), implies that what is written in works of the government is not valid. In the current legislative decree nothing is mentioned regarding Works of "legal entities", like Government, municipalities and organizations.
- Law No. 27806.- Law of Transparency and Access to Public Information, allows not only access but also its unlimited use, since said law does not prohibit it. According to the Constitution of Peru (1993): No one is obliged to do what the law does not mandate, nor is they prevented from doing what it does not prohibit.
- What is more, the Peruvian constitution says: Art.151.- Coercion: Anyone who, through threat or violence, forces another to do what the law does not command or prevents him from doing what it does not prohibit will be punished with a prison sentence of no more than 2 years.
-Indeed our laws don't need to tell things like "public access" does not equate public domain. Jjrt (talk) 23:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance

A lot of files being nominated on a DR you closed. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2603:301d:22b2:4000:85fc:a115:30eb:ddef (talk) 03:06, 26 October 2020‎ (UTC)

File:Gilberto Perin em A Pequena Galeria - Lisboa - foto Luís Pereira.jpg|thumb|Gilberto Perin em A Pequena Galeria - Lisboa - foto Luís Pereira

Olá Nat, o documento assinado pelo proprietário da foto, Luís Pereira, autorizando a publicação da foto e renunciando a seus direitos conexos foi encaminhado para o e-mail permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org na data de hoje 13 de dezembro as 18:50. [Ticket#: 2020121310007855]. english Hello Nat, the document signed by the owner of the photo, Luís Pereira, authorizing the publication of the photo and waiving its related rights was forwarded to the email permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org on today, December 13 at 6 pm: 50. [Ticket #: 2020121310007855].--Lucashempa (discussão) 22h10min de 13 de dezembro de 2020 (UTC)

Disrespecful manners

You are performing a clear disrespectful manner because I dismissed mi petition about File:Carlos Garcia y Garcia.jpg, in order to change the errors in COM:Peru, but you wrote that it should not be altered. I don't know where are you from but clearly, you trampling our laws and sovereignty, ignoring the legality of our laws and their derogations. Regarding Peruvian laws, only Peruvians can discuss them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjrt (talk • contribs) 04:05, 24 December 2020‎ (UTC)

File:Surendran Shelini PhD thesis.pdf

Hi Nat, I gave some detail in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Surendran Shelini PhD thesis.pdf. The literature overview part of the document is highly valuable as a basis for a new Wikipedia article and shall be used soon. In case you should disagree: How would you suggest that I may prove that the author has released it's right? Regards --Minihaa (talk) 15:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Minihaa: Copyright is not the issue with the deletion discussion, but more so whether or not the file is in scope. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Nat, thank you for your swift response. Unfortunately, this did not answer my question. --Minihaa (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Бмхүн disruptive overwriting. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Bidgee (talk) 12:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Re: NPS Calhoun discussions

I intend to contact NPS Calhoun over these listings—what justification they have for the PD-USGov listing, &c. Their connection is down at the moment, however, so I won’t be able to produce a response immediately. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC).

Hi @TE(æ)A,ea.: Please do not revert closures. Once you can provide the appropriate evidence as required by COM:EVID, you can start a new request(s). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Can you check email please?

t981130 told me that he confirmed that he has emailed to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org but he doesn't know exactly where the problem is. Can you check his email please?--Kai3952 (talk) 06:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

• There is currently a backlog of emails at OTRS. Once OTRS has determined that received sufficient permission for the files, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding and patience. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Cats

Hi. Many thanks for bringing back File:Belgin Doruk.jpg. Would you mind also bringing back the red cats thereat? (i.e. Category:Belgin Doruk and Category:Ayhan Işık which were deleted afterwards.) Thanks in advance and cheers. --E4024 (talk) 03:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Ah, another question, just for curiosity: Now that the file has been liberated, is it possible to bring back File:Belgin Doruk (cropped).jpg also? Is it covered by FoP/Turkey as well? Thanks for your time. --E4024 (talk) 04:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

¡Una barnstar para ti!

	La Insignia de Diligencia
	Gracias Nat por ayudarme tanto y Besos y hasta pronto ¿ Espero ? EduWiki 01:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Nat

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Nat,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

UwernJong-WTM-London.jpg

Hi there, just following up on the above image. I sent in permission a while ago, but never heard back. Just wondering if there’s anything more I’m required to do. Noted its status is still queued. Thanks in advance. 3SLR (talk) 00:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Explanatory request - undeletion of file: Tota bijagual mamapacha mapa res 1771 2016 x1900.png

Hi, I wonder why this undeletion request could not be done? (official approval for publishing was available). Thank you! --Grasshopper (talk) 15:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

• @FMontecito: To quote the instructions on Undeletion requests: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

File:File:Andy Sophie avec l'AS Sainte-Suzanne.jpg

Bonjour, je suis vraiment scandalisé des règles concernant le retrait de ma photo. Les métadonnés sur cette photo appartiens à l'ancien propriétaire de l'appareil photo qui me l'a vendu en juin 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dadam97490 (talk • contribs) 09:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Dadam97490: Pour la possibilité de restauration, le titulaire du droit d'auteur doit envoyer une autorisation sous license dite «libre» par courriel à l'OTRS (permissions-commonswikimedia.org ou permissions-frwikimedia.org) Une fois que l'OTRS a déterminé qu'ils ont reçu une autorisation suffisante et qu'il n'y a pas d'autre raison de suppression, un(e) agent(e) de l'OTRS effectuera ou demandera la restauration. Merci de votre compréhension. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Undeletion Charles Hoskinson

Hi, You cloed this request: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Charles_Hoskinson_20201031_121532.jpg But OTRS did not determined anything on this image. The email was from 31 okt 2020 (mainly concerning other images rights) and this image was uploaded in december. This is the first request for undeletion on this image. The email is mearly proof on copyright release. Can you undelete it, or is there another proces for undeletion? --FlippyFlink (talk) 20:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

• @FlippyFlink: If permission was sent to OTRS, it would up to them to request undeletion -- To quote the instructions on Undeletion requests: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick reply. I asked permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to undelete the image. Best regards, --FlippyFlink (talk) 08:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Removing photos

Hello Nat

You recently removed photos from wiki commons page.

They are British Museum photos but I have followed the copyright policy of the museum of share them on wiki commons.

Please can you reinstall them?

I spent a lot of time uploading them and am very disappointed they have been taken down.

I raise this issue with another editor when they were first proposed to be deleted but have not had any feedback on this at all

Jononmac46 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jononmac46 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

• Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

• @Jononmac46: Unfortunately, I am prevented from restoring the files by policy. While the objects pictured may be in the public domain, the photos themselves attract new copyright. Furthermore, British Museum licenses their photo under CC-BY-SA-NC, which is a licence incompatible with Commons licensing policy which prohibits non-commercial licences. Regards, Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Re:

Hi Mr. Nat , I would like to let you report that the well-known dodger named a1cb3 is back with this sock, so if you could kindly Global block it in time, you would do me a very welcome favor, thank you --37.182.21.74 12:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)--[[Specia

your assistance please...

You deleted File:Sarah Lohman and Eight Flavors, 2017.JPG with the rationale "Unaccepted or insufficient permission for use on Commons". Subsequently, File:Sarah Lohman Eight Flavors Loganberry Books.jpg has been uploaded, with an acceptable OTRS ticket.

Can you help me out? Was the problem with the first photo that Ms Lohman handed her camera to a passing friendly stranger, who agreed to snap a photo, and someone then challenged that photo claiming the copyright owned by the passing friendly stranger, not Ms Lohman?

So, the 2nd OTRS ticket does not support the first image? Geo Swan (talk) 01:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Geo Swan: Permission for File:Sarah Lohman and Eight Flavors, 2017.JPG under Ticket:2020081910008888 was insufficient as it did not come from the copyright holder (the photographer). The photographer of File:Sarah Lohman Eight Flavors Loganberry Books.jpg subsequently uploaded the photo at the subject's request and sufficient permission was received under Ticket:2020090510004834, supported with evidence provided under Ticket:2020081910008888. In short, the second image's licensing is supported by both Ticket:2020090510004834 and Ticket:2020081910008888, but the first image is supported by neither ticket. Hope that answers your questions. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Received threat from another user

Perhaps you should consider that it is one thing to violate someone's copyright and another to lie about it when challenged. Copyright owners are generally interested in having copyright violations taken down, but someone who continues to claim that they are the copyright owner may be looking at legal action. Since your real life identity is on some of your uploads, you might want to think about that. Mo Billings (talk) 21:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

I received this in my talk page. This the user that was trying to blacklist/block my whole account without investigating each of my contribution. The ongoing discussion is at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Audioboss

I interpret this as threat to my privacy and a form of hounding and harassment. --Audioboss (talk) 02:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Audioboss I am sorry if you interpreted my comments as a threat. I am suggesting that you think about how your copyright violations may have consequences outside of Commons. No threat is intended or implied. I do not understand how this is in any way a "threat to your privacy". Mo Billings (talk) 03:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Mo, I accept your apology. The discussion is getting so heated up that everything gets less constructive. I will speedy delete anything that you deem questionable. The only think that I got upset was that you did not communicate with me before you put me into notice to be blacklisted and blocked. You generalized all my uploads as questionable. I did upload many personal photographs for wikicommons which you judged as fakes right away. It seemed hard to contribute anything but photos. Just like anyone else, I need guidance for projects. I do request to please check each description because some them may not be ambiguous for Wikicommons like the few Philippine politicians whose photos were on Public domain because I took them from government website. Copyrights laws in the Philippines should permit this. Also, the Philippine Generals are from century old photos- if I can update them with the raw scan- it should be ok. Please work with me also- I can definitely make my contributions less ambiguous and within a more clearer scope. You just need to communicate with me. I don't mind being criticized but I am open for suggestions and will always cooperate. In fact, you can definitely help me if I have something to propose in the future, I can get your input. Finally, please keep my File:Pacifichelys urbinai.jpg , I really took a long time drawing that for my Paleontology contribution. --Audioboss (talk) 04:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

You uploaded images that were copyright violations and lied about their origins. When caught, you continued to lie, even creating fake "clippings" to support your lies. You are simply can't be trusted. It's not up to me if your uploads get deleted, your Flickr channel gets blacklisted, and you get blocked, but it is the only sensible result. At this point, you're just wasting people's time. Mo Billings (talk) 14:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

File:TOPsport logo (1).png

Cher Nat,

merci pour la restauration et pour tes commentaires. Je ne comprends pas : pourquoi trouves-tu l'allégation {{own}} inappropriée ?

En ce qui concerne le niveau de création des logos, je trouve que l'opinion dominante ici est problématique, et selon mon impression, obscurcie par peu de professionnalisme. Parfois, il y a une profonde originalité dans le simple. Par exemple, je considère que le marquage des logos DB et coop, tous deux créés par Kurt Weidemann, est une erreur grotesque. J'ai travaillé dans une maison d'édition jusqu'en 2011 et j'ai eu l'occasion de rencontrer Weidemann lors d'une demi-journée de conférence-débat. - Je suis très heureux à chaque fois que les détenteurs de droits accordent un cc-by-sa et que l'on nous épargne l'évaluation du niveau de création.

Salutations du pays de Neckar, passe un bon week-end de Pâques, --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:18, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

• Bonjour, bonsoir @Mussklprozz: Merci pour ton message. Ankry est l'administrateur qui a restauré le fichier et de l'avis que l'utilisation de {{Own}} est inappropriée. J'ai seulement fermé la demande comme {{Done}}. En te souhaitant une bonne fin-de-semaine et de bonne fête de Pâques, bien cordialement. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Behruzhesari

Hello, the above user is Abolfazlebrahimi64 socks.--MADdi0X (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

And this Hoosinaghili is another of his socks.--MADdi0X (talk) 00:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Undeletion Request File:Angelo Vermeulen at KAdE Amersfoort.jpg

Hi Nat,

You have deleted my 'Undeletion Request' for 'File:Angelo Vermeulen at KAdE Amersfoort.jpg' without very clear reasons. I have now added the EXIF back to the image and would like to upload it again. Also, Angelo Vermeulen has credited me officially on his Facebook page for the image that he has used from me. So I would like to know whether it is possible for me to re-upload the image, but now with the EXIF and statement from Angelo Vermeulen himself. And if not, what else can I do to have the image succesfully uploaded again? Thank you in advance.

Warm regards, --YourBestFriend3000 (talk) 10:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

PS. Great sandwiches — Preceding unsigned comment added by YourBestFriend3000 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Ticket:2021040510008374

Bonjour Nat,

suite à ton commentaire dans le billet - pourrais-tu prendre le relais ? Je me sens partial à cause de la discussion.

Je t'en serais reconnaissant, amitiés --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

P. S.: Voir aussi --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Farewell letter of Leopold von Plessen.jpg

Hallo Nat, vielen Dank für den Ping in der Wiederherstellungsdiskussion. Leider habe ich die Nachricht erst heute gesehen, sonst hätte ich mich in der Diskussion geäußert. Allerdings muss ich die Behauptung einer vorgetäuschten Begründung (a pretended rationale as the requester ThT is known to be in feud with the uploader) zurückweisen. @Achim55  kennt meine Löschanträge und die Begründungen von Anfang an, denn ich hatte ihn im September 2020 um Rat gebeten. Leider kann ich anhand der Diskussionen mit Gordito1869 nicht mehr nachweisen, dass ich mich meinerseits keinesfalls in Fehde mit diesem Benutzer befunden habe oder befinde, da Achim55 sowohl die Versionsgeschichte der Benutzerseite als auch die der Benutzerdiskussionsseite am 24.09.2020 gelöscht hat (auf Bitten von Gordito1869). So wird lediglich aus einer Diskussion mit Jeff G. und meinen Angaben in der Löschdiskussion deutlich, dass es mir ausschließlich um die Einhaltung von Commons:Project scope ging. Mit der offenbar innerfamiliären Auseinandersetzung hatte und habe ich nichts zu tun. Gruß, --ThT (talk) 16:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Report

Hello, please take a look at this report: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Files named with meaningless/disruptive names (motivated renaming was reverted without any valid reason) as these are serious everyday violations of the Commons rules and protection of meaningless names (in this case, Kalumny which translates as Columns). User Kazimier Lachnovič with filemover rights constantly performs violations of the Commons rules, creates instability issues and protects meaningless names, thus creates confusion. His Commons admin rights previously were lifted, but it is clear that it is not enough. -- Pofka (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

User:ABCozyOfficial unblocked

FYI, I unblocked ABCozyOfficial. I looked at both the user talk page on ja-WP and the author's own website (there's a small link at the bottom of the page) and I am satisfied that this user account represents the author. Do you want them to verify their identify in OTRS as well? Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 01:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

That is the normal and standard process for this project. As such, it is preferable. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

@Howcheng: Furthermore, the username clearly violates the username policy as it is explicitly promotional in nature. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

I disagree that this is a promotional username. This editor is a representative of the author named Abe Koji (surname first in Japanese), who uses the pen name ABCozy (the pronunciation is similar). It is permissible for users to have usernames of notable people or organizations when they are the official representatives. Would you be happier if the username was just ABCozy? That would fit within the letter of the law. —howcheng {chat} 00:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

@Howcheng: Whether I'm happy with the username or not is irrelevant. If you feel.that it is sufficient, then I have no further issues with the username itself. However, as a matter of procedure and process, either VRT verification is needed or a link to the notice from the userpage and a link on the notice to the userpage is required. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Great, thanks, I'll be sure to let them know. —howcheng {chat} 18:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

COM:UDR#File:Nakamura Ganjiro as Tojuro, 1925.jpg

Please, make your final decision consistent with your summary comment: one way or the other. Ankry (talk) 00:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

@Ankry: Sorry, the closing script sometimes glitches, and does the opposite of what was intended. The decision has been corrected. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

(Adding here because this is about the same UDR.) Hi, I have a comment to make that might change the outcome of that UDR you closed a few hours ago. My argument is that, in response to the request for the publication date, it was published in 1927 and "Published without compliance with US formalities, and in the public domain in its source country as of URAA date" in Commons:Hirtle_chart should apply. (This is a short version, and I might expand more if needed.) I guess I could open a new request, but because the closure was so recent, I wanted to see if you are willing to reopen it. Thank you. whym (talk) 07:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

@Whym: Thanks for your comment. If the initial publication was in 1927, that it is irrelevant whether it was published with or without US formalities (as URAA applies then). This means that the image can be undeleted in 2023. Ankry (talk) 08:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

You are right, I somehow thought the artist died earlier than 1946, not 1960. Sorry for the confusion. whym (talk) 10:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alsatian_definite_articles.svg

Thanks for that file. Please correct these:

Die bestimmten Artikels in Elsässisch =>

Die bestimmten Artikel im Elsässischen

Definite articles in Alsatian => The definite ...

And according to http://www.alsa-immer.eu/Elsassischa_Grammatik.xml apparently

D'bschtemmt Àrtìkel ùf Elsässisch =>

D'bschtemmta Àrtìkel ùf Elsässisch

Thanks! --Espoo (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

De-adminship warning (Feb 2022)

Dear Nat. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your admin rights and also additional permissions (bureaucrat/oversighter/checkuser/interface-admin), if any, on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2022 before 11th March, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose their rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you! -- 4nn1l2 14:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Sound Logo

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

De-admin warning

Dear Nat. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your admin rights on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2023 before 13 March, and also to make at least 5 further admin actions in the following 6 months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose their rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you! -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Emerging Superpowers.png

Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 19:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Thornhill map

On the map you made for the Toronto suburb of Thornhill, the place names are angled with the street grid. I wonder if you could rotate them to be level with the overall image for appearance? Transportfan70 (talk) 16:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)