User talk:Multichill/Archives/2022/November

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

great work on structured data in wikimedia

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.65.36.14 (talk) 18:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		great work on structured data in wikimedia

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ouzo 2ltr.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 16:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Mesdag / Utrecht

Hi Multichill, bij circa 63 foto's van het panorama mesdag gebouw staan verkeerde bestandsnamen, ~~foutieve adresbeschrijvingen en ook verkeerde cats~~. Ze betreffen alle zo te zien het wel het panorama Mesdag in Den Haag en hebben dus niets met Utrecht te maken. Hoop van dienst te zijn, hoop dat het opgelost kan worden, groet. Peli (talk) 04:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Het komt neer op een hernoeming van ca. 50 bestanden waarbij de connotatie Utrecht moet worden vervangen door Den Haag. ~~En dan hercategorisatie. En descr. nakijken.~~ Er zijn wat meer ondercats voor dit museum nu. Meeste is aangepast nu, behalve de hernoeming van de bestanden. Kun je dat effeciënt doen? Bedankt. Peli (talk) 13:06, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Dat wordt gewoon met het handje. Ik loop het wel na. Multichill (talk) 10:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Did something change with BotMultichillT?

Hi, I've noticed in the last few days that BotMultichillT isn't visiting my photos as much to add SDC to them - particularly newly uploaded photos, which it used to find quite regularly within 24 hours of them being uploaded. For example, it has yet to find File:Alcazaba de Almería 2022 060.jpg - it has visited File:Alcazaba de Almería 2022 061.jpg, except it only added copyright rather than the rest of the usual data. Not a critical issue, but I thought I'd give a heads-up in case something had gone wrong. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

The tracker category Category:Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 missing SDC copyright license seems to be missing since this change so the bot wasn't picking up the files. I undid it for now and reported at Module talk:SDC tracking.

Code for the bot didn't change for a while, just self missing so it doesn't get picked up as own work. Multichill (talk) 10:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for finding the problem! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:12, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Tag Bot SDC edits

Hi Multichill, I've been asked (Commons:Village_pump#SchlurcherBot) to tag my bot's SDC edits, so they can be easier identified (and filtered out if needed). I've looked into Special:Tags and apparently any admin can generate new tags and technically the tag can be added as a parameter to the wbeditentitiy post-request quite easily. I've tried tags=ACDC succesfully. Overall I am willing to implement this. It would be great, if your bot uses the same tag. So a couple of questions:

Would you agree that a tag is appropriate?
Would you use the same tag for your bot's edits?
If 1. and 2., would you please generate a tag and let me know the code. My suggestion would be something along the lines Tag short name/code: BotSDC (for Api Use) Tag description: Automated SDC edit (with link to the SDC page, an even shorter description would be better).

Best regards, -- Schlurcher (talk) 16:30, 21 November 2022 (UTC)